I coach a U13 team and switched from a 4-3-3 to a 3-4-1-2 last season when I saw how effective Tuchel’s back three was. Having a double pivot sitting in front of my back three gave me so much more defensive stability. And having two strikers (one who likes to run in behind and the other who likes to come short and have balls played to his feet) made life much difficult for other teams’ CBs than our prior single striker setup. It helped that i have a couple of wingbacks who can run all day.
something to add is in these formations, wide diamonds with positional interchanges are also adapted by teams like Tuchel's Chelsea and Atalanta, bringing more attacking possibilities.
This is a great channel, I have run a boys team from them being aged 6 to now at 15, we have won series unbeaten (until Covid put a stop to things), I prefer 3-5-2 but I also find you can’t be tied down to one formation that you like to play but rather concentrate on the players abilities that you have available to you for each match!
Thank you! Yes I agree, I feel a lot of managers fail trying to do that, they had one system work really well for them at one club and just assume it will work perfectly for every other club. Knowing your players is the most important thing!
@@nofurtherwest3474 in Sweden it begins with 3v3,then progresses to 5v5, 7v7,9v9, 11v11 but I always used the same principle from 7 a side onwards that choose a formation that suits the players I had available for each match. Especially as the younger they are the more equal time you must give them regardless of ability.
@@mickgarrett4809 Can i ask, since you have worked with youth - do you rotate all players through positions? do some stay in one position if they really are a natural fit for it?
I think 352 has advantages and disadvantages as other sistema have them. But the preeminent difficult when using this, Is That you need ti have at least 3/4 particular players of you want to use it at the full potential. The libero, the 2 wings and for me at least 1 other player between defensor and midfielder. They must have a lot of skills, They must be multipurpose. If you don't have these players you will have a lot of problems in the game. For example Inter with perisic. In last season the gave him on loan because Conte didn't see him ready for this role (but not for me). During the Summer they bought hakimi (a Specialist of the role) and worked hard for reuse perisic. And as libero they use de vrij, That play in this position since he was a baby 😂 (Lazio, Holland, Feyenoord). Another interesting point Is That this system Is frequently used only as an offensive system by a lot of teams, drawing back a midfielder in the center or side (in la salida lavolpiana). Beautiful video! ❤️ I Need to recover the lasts
Antonio Conte is definitely a master with a back three. What he's done with Inter this season is fantastic to see! I remember how he completely changed the premier League when he was at Chelsea
I predicted in 19/20 season that the back 3 formation is soon going to be the new META and I’m happy it is starting to happen, it’s such an effective formation.
It's how our national team (Denmark) does aswell, which everyone saw during the Euro's. However when the opposition presses high and disrupt our play out of defence, Like Russia and Wales tried to do, we opt out of the long ball to the attacker, as the attackers we normally use, aren't good enough in that aspect. Thankfully we have Andreas Christensen from Chelsea, whom we instead push up as a defensive mid and drag our wingbacks further back a bit, which essentially make us go from 3-4-3 to 4-3-3, which opens up new spaces for our passing game. And if they react to that we just change back again if need be. But good video. You've gotten another follower :)
Well done mate brilliant analysis. For the next video could you do the 3-3-1-3 often used by Marcelo Bielsa who was inspired by the Chilean team Colo Colo's 1991 Copa Libertadores winning season coach Croatian Mirko Jozic?
Best football tactic videos on TH-cam. I run an U14 team and, looking at my squad, have been thinking that 1-3-4-3 or 1-3-5-2 is their future. This has been really helpful in developing my thoughts.
I am the assistant to a 16u boys team in the Heartland League. We run a 3-1-4-2 with the holding mid having more of a defensive role and one of the center mids running the false 9 in attack. We have had tremendous success with it. It's all about the personnel and knowing their roles and everyone else's roles. The width and depth of the formations makes several options for trailing and attacking. Can be vulnerable to quick transitions.
It doesnt't matter what sport it is, you shouldn't tie yourself to any one single scheme or system because while you'll live by it, you'll also die by it. The best advice I ever got from a coach was: unless you're coaching college or higher and have your pick of the lot; fit your system to your personnel and not your personnel to your system.
How can this channel not have millions of views? Is it just not that old?? Anyway, thanks for the content. I will implement this free knowledge in our amateur level club.
Personally love back 3 formations.. But choosing a formation/system always starts with the player personnel available and what their individual as well as collective strengths (and weaknesses) are.. This may be easier to achieve flexibility with, the higher up in competition level one is working (especially the professional level), but even there it can sometimes come to certain restrictions... As a lower competition level youth coach, I have played in a back 4 at times primarily because I didn't have three healthy CBs available or a back 3 because I had no proper FB/WBs available 😅
Dude.. i loved it. They way you easily explain and present things. Maybe oneday you will reach millions of subs.. keep up🤗 And would love to analyse big matches tactics.
the biggest advantage this gives against a 4231 or a 433 is that it reduces the possibilities of the opposition dominating half-spaces or getting space between the lines. Both concepts were popularized by Guardiola and for 2 years nobody had an answer to it. With the pivots and back 3 very narrow, and the front 3 fluid allowing more people on the midfield, it takes away guardiola's aforementioned strengths and his biggest asset- numerical advantage in the midfield. it also allows an outlet with the fluid and clever readers of game in wing-backs and inside forwards.
I was in love with this type of formation in Roma's scudetto season (3-4-1-2/3-4-2-1 variation). This formation would work wonder if you have extraordinary wingbacks (like in Candela/Cafu partnership), who are good at both defensive & offensive. I wish Madrid has a bit more guts to field this formation, since historically they like the aggressive type of wingbacks much more than the defensive ones.
Fantastic! Could you do one like this for a 3-5-2? I know you kind of mentioned it already but I imagine it has its own details and intricacies to explore as well.
0:26 Isn't the 3-4-3 formation the one Rinus Michels uses? It shifts, starting with 4-3-3 as the libero moves up into the midfield. The total football (the revolution with the most significant worldwide impact) was around late 60's and early 70's.
Roma and Marseille are also good examples of these tactics, I also remember Dortmund using this formation at one point and the Belgium national team specializes at this
I just discover your channel and I'm impressed by your very easy to understand and thorough explanations of tactics. This channel is priceless for football fans. Great job 👍
You might consider numbering the player counters when you're jump-cutting between configurations within a formation. In this instance you might also have given more emphasis to the close connection (via Johan Cruyff) between the 4-3-3 and the 3-4-3. For me they can be almost different phases of the same formation. Good channel though.
Could you please do a video on the 3-4-2-1 formation? Conte and Tuchel use it and it’s a popular formation at all levels of 11v11 football. Love your content! Super helpful and informative
Men i was looking exactly for this, really good content, you should do a review on sporting clube de portugal season comanded by Ruben amorim, they played all season on a 3-4-3 formation and became champions after 19 years. Keep up with the good work.
I think 3-4-3 is a way to beat a stronger team. Because then you can use the width most effectively and that always creates problems for the opponent no matter how good they are. Or you can attack direct.
This formation was very hard for Arteta break…Arsenal press Chelsea from the right side of their own half then mount or Kovacic will play a long pass to Reece James to break arsenal defense. That’s were all their two goals come from ❤️💕 You good bro 😎
Watching Conte's 343 in tottenham, all you have to do is sit back and overload the midfield to completely nullify all attacks. Hopefully we can get some quality wingbacks.
Thanks for the video , one of the best channels and your analysis and explanation is amazing, am a soccer player and a grassroot coach , I think this formation has a tactics applied differently by teams like for example Real Madrid , I think formation and tactics two things that will make soccer developed thanks again ,
Forgetting Sporting Clube de Portugal tittle after 20 years with 3 at the back is such a shame! Every single game, either winning or loosing they played with the same 3-4-3
you can already see the perfect players to play this formation at united Rashford Rasmus Garna Malacia Bruno Ugarte Mazzraoui Martinez De Light Yoro Onana its as if ten hag wanted to transform the players to this formation at some point Mount for Bruno kobbie for ugarte dalot for mazzraoui zirkzee for Rasmus amad for garna and then you got 4 positions to fill next summer truly needed time
I am learning that Italian and English have some tactical false friends words: Italian centravanti is not centreforward (literal translation) but striker (attaccante, generic name for a forward) english centerforward may be translated with "seconda punta" (second striker)
Ciao, complimentissimi per il canale che trovo veramente fatto bene, a titolo di curiosità...mi piacerebbe saperne di più sul 343 di Zaccheroni. Non è che potresti fare un video?
Could you suggest the counter formation to the 343? This formation has a lot of cover all over the pitch and the team using it can quickly overload the wide area. Besides that, the space between the lines can be closed down quickly as the wingers can move narrow or the extra defender can move up to join the press.
Could you do a video 3-4-3 vs 4-3-3? I see the back 3 formation trend a bit over rated. To have the extra central defender, you are sacrificing either a defensive midfielder in the 4-3-3 or central playmaker in 4-2-3-1 resulting in a 2v3 center midfield leaving your defensive back line more exposed. The back 3 is more complicated due needing to work with the 2 wingbacks to rotate marking the opposing AMR/AML
Formation is not the only aspect that wins you games, plus it's not always rigid one from the start to final whistle. In many cases, those 3 CDs are more likely "sacrificing" the wings (in 3421/3412) or AM/Striker (in pure 343 or 343 with false 9 striker), not the DM. Since the double center pivots are usually MCs with strong defensive capabilities, or even DMs.
Now i realize how most perfect 343 is... Chelsea with the Last puzzle of the tactic, Lukaku, Will dominate the whole competition this year even so on... I can't see the best tactic other this can beat chelsea.... Only hans flick's munchen can beat chelsea with his overload players on front... But flick isn't at bayer now... I dont know for sure about the successor with his tactic, nagelsman, is it more than flick tactic or no...i dont know... I cant wait for that big match... They are, chelsea and munchen, ideal for the champions final
the only reason to play 3 at the back is cause you dont trust the defensive ability of your team. especially the defenders nowadays. Look at Conte, at juventus he had to play 3 CB's and three in the middle to make some balance and assure a great defending structure, while on his chelsea tenure, cause of Kante, he ditched the midfield trio for a duo.
No. From what I saw, teams with 343 and its variations are very offensive. Contrast to what we often see on drawing board, they often defend with those DMs to act as a screen/first responders, not with those 3 CDs, who act as more like last resort defense. So contrary to what you're saying, using 3 CDs usually means that the team trusts their defence, so much that they think 4 defenders is "waste of talent", and prefer that the extra man can be used on more forward up on the field role instead.
the back three defense leaves open space at the rear. I don't like also that 2 / 4 midfielders must be left and right back defenders. For me the midfield era should be covered with a clear 6, a 6-8 and an 8-10 player. So i prefer the 4-3-3
you didn't talk about it's transformation & its relationship in a 4-3-3 formation, as Real Madrid does, & as Argentina did in the last World Cup in Qatar 2022
I coach a U13 team and switched from a 4-3-3 to a 3-4-1-2 last season when I saw how effective Tuchel’s back three was. Having a double pivot sitting in front of my back three gave me so much more defensive stability. And having two strikers (one who likes to run in behind and the other who likes to come short and have balls played to his feet) made life much difficult for other teams’ CBs than our prior single striker setup. It helped that i have a couple of wingbacks who can run all day.
nice. did you win the title? play in some tournaments?
something to add is in these formations, wide diamonds with positional interchanges are also adapted by teams like Tuchel's Chelsea and Atalanta, bringing more attacking possibilities.
he said that
Like Johan Cruyff?
This is a great channel, I have run a boys team from them being aged 6 to now at 15, we have won series unbeaten (until Covid put a stop to things), I prefer 3-5-2 but I also find you can’t be tied down to one formation that you like to play but rather concentrate on the players abilities that you have available to you for each match!
Thank you! Yes I agree, I feel a lot of managers fail trying to do that, they had one system work really well for them at one club and just assume it will work perfectly for every other club. Knowing your players is the most important thing!
You must have added players over the years since at youngest age you play 4v4 or 5v5, then 7v7 usually for U9/U10, then 9v9, then 11v11.
@@nofurtherwest3474 in Sweden it begins with 3v3,then progresses to 5v5, 7v7,9v9, 11v11 but I always used the same principle from 7 a side onwards that choose a formation that suits the players I had available for each match.
Especially as the younger they are the more equal time you must give them regardless of ability.
@@mickgarrett4809 Oh you are in Sweden; very nice.
Good point.
@@mickgarrett4809 Can i ask, since you have worked with youth - do you rotate all players through positions? do some stay in one position if they really are a natural fit for it?
Such an underrated channel, you deserve 900K minimum, such quality content
Thank you so much man, maybe one day lol
@@FootballMeta can you uploading the Belgian national team formation soon ?
@@lexkanyima2195 isnt that 3 at the back?
@@f1-morgan a 3-4-3 formation.
Yes
totally agree
Most underrated football channel on TH-cam 💯
I think 352 has advantages and disadvantages as other sistema have them. But the preeminent difficult when using this, Is That you need ti have at least 3/4 particular players of you want to use it at the full potential. The libero, the 2 wings and for me at least 1 other player between defensor and midfielder. They must have a lot of skills, They must be multipurpose. If you don't have these players you will have a lot of problems in the game. For example Inter with perisic. In last season the gave him on loan because Conte didn't see him ready for this role (but not for me). During the Summer they bought hakimi (a Specialist of the role) and worked hard for reuse perisic. And as libero they use de vrij, That play in this position since he was a baby 😂 (Lazio, Holland, Feyenoord).
Another interesting point Is That this system Is frequently used only as an offensive system by a lot of teams, drawing back a midfielder in the center or side (in la salida lavolpiana).
Beautiful video! ❤️
I Need to recover the lasts
Antonio Conte is definitely a master with a back three. What he's done with Inter this season is fantastic to see! I remember how he completely changed the premier League when he was at Chelsea
It’s very difficult to press effectively with 352
I predicted in 19/20 season that the back 3 formation is soon going to be the new META and I’m happy it is starting to happen, it’s such an effective formation.
It's how our national team (Denmark) does aswell, which everyone saw during the Euro's. However when the opposition presses high and disrupt our play out of defence, Like Russia and Wales tried to do, we opt out of the long ball to the attacker, as the attackers we normally use, aren't good enough in that aspect. Thankfully we have Andreas Christensen from Chelsea, whom we instead push up as a defensive mid and drag our wingbacks further back a bit, which essentially make us go from 3-4-3 to 4-3-3, which opens up new spaces for our passing game. And if they react to that we just change back again if need be. But good video. You've gotten another follower :)
Well done mate brilliant analysis. For the next video could you do the 3-3-1-3 often used by Marcelo Bielsa who was inspired by the Chilean team Colo Colo's 1991 Copa Libertadores winning season coach Croatian Mirko Jozic?
Thank you! That's a good idea, I have a few other videos to get through but I'll add it to the list 👍🏻
Best football tactic videos on TH-cam. I run an U14 team and, looking at my squad, have been thinking that 1-3-4-3 or 1-3-5-2 is their future. This has been really helpful in developing my thoughts.
I am the assistant to a 16u boys team in the Heartland League. We run a 3-1-4-2 with the holding mid having more of a defensive role and one of the center mids running the false 9 in attack. We have had tremendous success with it. It's all about the personnel and knowing their roles and everyone else's roles. The width and depth of the formations makes several options for trailing and attacking. Can be vulnerable to quick transitions.
It doesnt't matter what sport it is, you shouldn't tie yourself to any one single scheme or system because while you'll live by it, you'll also die by it. The best advice I ever got from a coach was: unless you're coaching college or higher and have your pick of the lot; fit your system to your personnel and not your personnel to your system.
How can this channel not have millions of views? Is it just not that old??
Anyway, thanks for the content. I will implement this free knowledge in our amateur level club.
Haha thank you! I only started the channel in November, but I'm very happy with how it's been growing lately
Personally love back 3 formations.. But choosing a formation/system always starts with the player personnel available and what their individual as well as collective strengths (and weaknesses) are.. This may be easier to achieve flexibility with, the higher up in competition level one is working (especially the professional level), but even there it can sometimes come to certain restrictions...
As a lower competition level youth coach, I have played in a back 4 at times primarily because I didn't have three healthy CBs available or a back 3 because I had no proper FB/WBs available 😅
Dude.. i loved it. They way you easily explain and present things.
Maybe oneday you will reach millions of subs.. keep up🤗
And would love to analyse big matches tactics.
Thank you so much! And I will definitely try and do some breakdowns of big matches, it's a good idea 👍🏻
Tuchel and Conte have entered the chat. I hope Chelsea keep this formation in the 21/22 season. Up Blues.
It won them the Champions league and there havent been any big changes in the team so why would they change it lol
Your passion for the game shines through. And is contagious😅. I find myself engrossed in your in depth analysis while simultaneously learning. 👏🏼
Your explanations are clear and to the point. Well done on this and other videos as well.
the biggest advantage this gives against a 4231 or a 433 is that it reduces the possibilities of the opposition dominating half-spaces or getting space between the lines. Both concepts were popularized by Guardiola and for 2 years nobody had an answer to it. With the pivots and back 3 very narrow, and the front 3 fluid allowing more people on the midfield, it takes away guardiola's aforementioned strengths and his biggest asset- numerical advantage in the midfield. it also allows an outlet with the fluid and clever readers of game in wing-backs and inside forwards.
I was in love with this type of formation in Roma's scudetto season (3-4-1-2/3-4-2-1 variation). This formation would work wonder if you have extraordinary wingbacks (like in Candela/Cafu partnership), who are good at both defensive & offensive.
I wish Madrid has a bit more guts to field this formation, since historically they like the aggressive type of wingbacks much more than the defensive ones.
Fantastic! Could you do one like this for a 3-5-2? I know you kind of mentioned it already but I imagine it has its own details and intricacies to explore as well.
Once the games starts the 3-4-3 and 3-5-2 are not that different, it's basically same but with a false 9.
@@nofurtherwest3474 u mean attacking midfielder
@@aleksandarpleskonjic6841 yeah i guess that's right, i'm not an expert
@@nofurtherwest3474 firmino and messi in 2009-2012 are false 9, but zidane and maradona are attacking midfielder, or simply 10
@@aleksandarpleskonjic6841 but doesn't messi play the 10 sometimes? or is he always false 9 or winger?
Very interesting and informative content. Keep it up bro 👍
0:26 Isn't the 3-4-3 formation the one Rinus Michels uses? It shifts, starting with 4-3-3 as the libero moves up into the midfield. The total football (the revolution with the most significant worldwide impact) was around late 60's and early 70's.
Press resistant and defensively strong, with pressing teams increasing, this formation is the sort of default for teams that used to play 4-4-2
I like the 3-4-3 the best. It's provides the best coverage over the pitch. And you can attack wide or centrally.
I think the 3-5-2 is a bit better.
But the 4-3-3... is great too, esp for buildup.
Prob best is a 4-3-3 that transitions into a 3-5-2 in attack.
I've just discovered your channel, and it's great!
Roma and Marseille are also good examples of these tactics, I also remember Dortmund using this formation at one point and the Belgium national team specializes at this
And soon, Paris avec Galtier
@@lucasfreire8360 oui naturellement
I just discover your channel and I'm impressed by your very easy to understand and thorough explanations of tactics. This channel is priceless for football fans. Great job 👍
Hell yes, thanks for this!
Thank you!
Jeez this channel has really awesome contents.love it man keep going
Thank you!!
You might consider numbering the player counters when you're jump-cutting between configurations within a formation. In this instance you might also have given more emphasis to the close connection (via Johan Cruyff) between the 4-3-3 and the 3-4-3. For me they can be almost different phases of the same formation. Good channel though.
Thanks for the tip, I'll make sure to include it next time
Could you please do a video on the 3-4-2-1 formation? Conte and Tuchel use it and it’s a popular formation at all levels of 11v11 football.
Love your content! Super helpful and informative
Men i was looking exactly for this, really good content, you should do a review on sporting clube de portugal season comanded by Ruben amorim, they played all season on a 3-4-3 formation and became champions after 19 years. Keep up with the good work.
I think 3-4-3 is a way to beat a stronger team. Because then you can use the width most effectively and that always creates problems for the opponent no matter how good they are. Or you can attack direct.
This formation was very hard for Arteta break…Arsenal press Chelsea from the right side of their own half then mount or Kovacic will play a long pass to Reece James to break arsenal defense. That’s were all their two goals come from ❤️💕
You good bro 😎
This channel is awesome! Exactly what I wanted to know.
Thanks for informations❤️👍🏼
Watching Conte's 343 in tottenham, all you have to do is sit back and overload the midfield to completely nullify all attacks. Hopefully we can get some quality wingbacks.
Great analysis 🔥🔥🔥
Brilliantly explained,. Subscribed immediately
Seen this in the Germany x Portugal match in Euro 2020. Everything you discussed happened offensively and defensively, the pros and weaknesses.
Exactly the page we needed
Cheers
Great work enjoyed this
Very good, objectively analysis of the formation, with excellent illustration i really enjoyed this video. ⚽💪
subscribed good content keep it up
Thanks for the video , one of the best channels and your analysis and explanation is amazing, am a soccer player and a grassroot coach , I think this formation has a tactics applied differently by teams like for example Real Madrid , I think formation and tactics two things that will make soccer developed thanks again ,
Here to learn wtf Tuchel is trying to do
I love how all of us r just so dedicated to the cause haha
Forgetting Sporting Clube de Portugal tittle after 20 years with 3 at the back is such a shame! Every single game, either winning or loosing they played with the same 3-4-3
It nice how football have gone to the next level with good tactics. I hope to past all this in my local church.
you can already see the perfect players to play this formation at united
Rashford Rasmus Garna
Malacia Bruno Ugarte Mazzraoui
Martinez De Light Yoro
Onana
its as if ten hag wanted to transform the players to this formation at some point
Mount for Bruno kobbie for ugarte dalot for mazzraoui zirkzee for Rasmus amad for garna and then you got 4 positions to fill next summer truly needed time
Ive always been a huge fan of the back 3 as much as I am of a front 3 funny enough. But I love more the diamond midfield 3 4 3/3 3 1 3.
I am learning that Italian and English have some tactical false friends words:
Italian centravanti is not centreforward (literal translation) but striker (attaccante, generic name for a forward)
english centerforward may be translated with "seconda punta" (second striker)
Very insightful
Really great video and cool channel.
Only thing is you are speaking a little fast, which is sometimes to much for my little head.
Great video, here’s a comment for the YT algorithm
Good work with the channel mate, any chance you could do a 3-1-4-2 or 3-1-2-4 video next?
Awesome content!
Great vid!
Now I am part of your yt channel
Subscribed ❤️
New subscriber
I'm impressed.
Great video
Very interesting and informational, thank you very much
Ciao, complimentissimi per il canale che trovo veramente fatto bene, a titolo di curiosità...mi piacerebbe saperne di più sul 343 di Zaccheroni. Non è che potresti fare un video?
Feel like a tactical genius, England used this against Italy besides losing it was very effective
I hated it when Southgate switched to a 4-3-3 when they conceded. It made them weaker
So back 3 got a buff and it's META Now!
Good explain 👍😍
Hi Football Meta, thumbs up for the great content! Could you analyze the 4-4-2 diamond formation, since it was used by Ferguson and Ancelloti's Milan?
Could you suggest the counter formation to the 343? This formation has a lot of cover all over the pitch and the team using it can quickly overload the wide area. Besides that, the space between the lines can be closed down quickly as the wingers can move narrow or the extra defender can move up to join the press.
You just got a new subscriber
Amazing content
Football in cycles? The return of the sweeper?
Could you do a video 3-4-3 vs 4-3-3? I see the back 3 formation trend a bit over rated. To have the extra central defender, you are sacrificing either a defensive midfielder in the 4-3-3 or central playmaker in 4-2-3-1 resulting in a 2v3 center midfield leaving your defensive back line more exposed. The back 3 is more complicated due needing to work with the 2 wingbacks to rotate marking the opposing AMR/AML
A versus scenario series is honestly a great idea
Formation is not the only aspect that wins you games, plus it's not always rigid one from the start to final whistle.
In many cases, those 3 CDs are more likely "sacrificing" the wings (in 3421/3412) or AM/Striker (in pure 343 or 343 with false 9 striker), not the DM. Since the double center pivots are usually MCs with strong defensive capabilities, or even DMs.
These tactic videos are very interesting
Thank you 🙏
can we see 433 !?? thank you very much for the excellent and instructive video
Of course, keep your eye on the channel for any updates 👍🏻
Can you recommend a book that explains the advantages and disadvantages of these various systems.
Very difficult to win the Prem with 3 central defenders.
Question is what could break the meta of a back 3 next...
Maybe something even more midfield centric?
Well explained
Now i realize how most perfect 343 is...
Chelsea with the Last puzzle of the tactic, Lukaku, Will dominate the whole competition this year even so on...
I can't see the best tactic other this can beat chelsea....
Only hans flick's munchen can beat chelsea with his overload players on front...
But flick isn't at bayer now...
I dont know for sure about the successor with his tactic, nagelsman, is it more than flick tactic or no...i dont know...
I cant wait for that big match... They are, chelsea and munchen, ideal for the champions final
thanks
I didn't see how old this video was at first, and then I heard the phrase "Antonio Conte's inter Milan"
the only reason to play 3 at the back is cause you dont trust the defensive ability of your team. especially the defenders nowadays. Look at Conte, at juventus he had to play 3 CB's and three in the middle to make some balance and assure a great defending structure, while on his chelsea tenure, cause of Kante, he ditched the midfield trio for a duo.
No.
No. From what I saw, teams with 343 and its variations are very offensive. Contrast to what we often see on drawing board, they often defend with those DMs to act as a screen/first responders, not with those 3 CDs, who act as more like last resort defense.
So contrary to what you're saying, using 3 CDs usually means that the team trusts their defence, so much that they think 4 defenders is "waste of talent", and prefer that the extra man can be used on more forward up on the field role instead.
Hii,
Please tell me which type of passing style using for this formation (3-4-3)?
the back three defense leaves open space at the rear. I don't like also that 2 / 4 midfielders must be left and right back defenders. For me the midfield era should be covered with a clear 6, a 6-8 and an 8-10 player. So i prefer the 4-3-3
How do you effectively counter this formation..?
you didn't talk about it's transformation & its relationship in a 4-3-3 formation, as Real Madrid does, & as Argentina did in the last World Cup in Qatar 2022
You can't high press with 3-4-3. When you press with you wingers you left so much space for opposite wingers to exploit.
3-4-3 provided more triangles to play tiki taka
Where can you get that tactics board and pieces?
Next video on 352 formation
Incresing in popularity? Maybe in 2016 or something, it's pretty common today.
What role will we give to fonte🇵🇹 in back in this formation?
I would use a back 3 but not the biggest fan of it
1) interesting video
2) where is that tactical board from😍
What's a possibility of playing a false-9 in a 3-men defense?
Do a video on baca formation of 3412
Sir u made euro 2021 tactics plz
You should include real match now and then
what software you use for the animation?
I use davinci resolve. It's free and the amount of features you get is incredible
@@FootballMeta Thank you
I have a request in you - could you let me know the software you use to animate this formation ?
Hey man, so the arrows and graphics are done with nacsport and klipdraw, while the editing with text is done with DavinciResolve, hope that helps