First Law of Thermodynamics: History of the Concept of Energy

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 20 ก.ย. 2024
  • Where did the first law of thermodynamics come from? Why is energy called energy and what has that to do with heat? Where did the 1/2 in kinetic energy come from? Watch this video to find out the real people behind the science!
    My Patreon Page (thanks!):
    www.patreon.co...
    The music is from the awesome Kim Nalley of course www.KimNalley.com
    The Video of Emilie du Chatelet showing Voltaire the damage of dropping lead balls is from Nova, "Einstein's Big Idea" : • Video

ความคิดเห็น • 335

  • @hiimspee828
    @hiimspee828 5 ปีที่แล้ว +83

    Really well put together, and engaging. Feels approachable, even to a carpenter such as myself! First video of yours I've found, so got some catch-up to do.

    • @Kathy_Loves_Physics
      @Kathy_Loves_Physics  5 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      I am so glad you liked it and that it made sense to you (I was a little concerned with covering so many people and so much time).

    • @hiimspee828
      @hiimspee828 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Kathy_Loves_Physics your proper use of the video essay format helped a visual person like me, at least, keep hold of the thread. Great stuff!

  • @Asolo137
    @Asolo137 3 ปีที่แล้ว +90

    As a retired high school physics teacher, I felt like I had struck gold finding your TH-cam channel. For my entire career, I had taught all these concepts and equations about energy, work, heat, thermodynamics, etc. but always wanted to know more about the history. Thank you so much for filling in the gaps. I, too, love physics and history, and now that I am retired, I have the time to pursue both at my leisure. Your love and passion shine through. Keep up the excellent work.

    • @philipslaulia
      @philipslaulia 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      me too

    • @keybawd4023
      @keybawd4023 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      I couldn't agree more. I graduated with a masters with a largely theoretical thesis on free radicals. I know and am fascinated by the story of how our knowledge of the subatomic world developed in the first half of the last century. These videos have brought the whole period to life, science is 'humanised' ! And as a teacher I am sure you will agree she explains things so well.

    • @miguelmouta5372
      @miguelmouta5372 ปีที่แล้ว

      Indeed an excellent job.

    • @Loots1
      @Loots1 ปีที่แล้ว

      I dont know if you guys know this or not but you can learn history in these things called books...

    • @TravisTellsTruths
      @TravisTellsTruths 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Excellent. I'm not waiting until retirement. We don't have much time

  • @ramonescaba4293
    @ramonescaba4293 2 ปีที่แล้ว +34

    i'm a mechanical engineer and worked for 25 plus years in a nuclear power plant have substantial training in steam power engineering but it still fascinates me knowing the history and the scientists who started all these, thanks for the video

  • @bobbymcgeorge
    @bobbymcgeorge 4 ปีที่แล้ว +62

    Thanks for introducing me to Emilie du Chatelet - what an incredible scientist she was!

    • @Kathy_Loves_Physics
      @Kathy_Loves_Physics  4 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      It was so nice that she was famous enough that all of her work (and many letters) were translated into English for me. I really like her too.

    • @aniksamiurrahman6365
      @aniksamiurrahman6365 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Sadly she left out another remarkable woman who finally figured out what it is that's actually constant. This woman is mathematician Frau Noether. Go check her work if you are really interested.

    • @aniksamiurrahman6365
      @aniksamiurrahman6365 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Kathy_Loves_Physics But I didn't like that you left out mathematician Emmy Noether. Her contribution about what energy is and what it is that's remaining constant overshadows Einstein and Feynman combined.

    • @lawrencedoliveiro9104
      @lawrencedoliveiro9104 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I don’t think Nöther’s theorem would have made sense to any 19th century physicist. It only comes into its own after you look at all the other conserved (or seemingly conserved) quantities particle physicists were discovering in the 20th century.
      So yes, there is a place for talking about the amazing depth of her finding, but not here.

    • @tomc642
      @tomc642 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Kathy_Loves_Physics @5:11 when referring to Leibnitz and his living force, can’t understand one of the words “.. when objects found ( ? ) each other”. The word is muffled, what does it say?

  • @robertrogers7331
    @robertrogers7331 4 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    Emilie du Chatelet translated Newton not only into French, but more importantly, into human. Her mastery of The Calculus allowed her to modulate Newton's notation into a form that fundamentally enhanced its acquisition. Too many women are known as so and so's girlfriend. When I think of Voltaire I consider him to be 'that guy' who was Emilie du Chatelet's boyfriend. Excellent content, superior presentation, concisely presented.

    • @dahawk8574
      @dahawk8574 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Voltaire was Emilie’s boyfriend.
      That’s a brilliant line. I can imagine Kathy wishing she came up with that herself for this video.

  • @robertrogers7331
    @robertrogers7331 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    I am a physics guy and a spoken word broadcaster. Thank Goddess that TH-cam exists and that you are the madwoman that you are. Clearly you are driven as you dig out the details of the lives and times of the discoverers and then beautifully blend it with their original writing. My education was painful, the material drab and flat. Your productions are the work of an enthusiastic communications angel and will surely be an ongoing basic resource for generations of students. P.S. Emilie is my hero.... that scribbler was lucky to be her boyfriend.

    • @Kathy_Loves_Physics
      @Kathy_Loves_Physics  9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      “ that scribbler was lucky to be her boyfriend” is the best description of Voltaire EVER!!! ❤️

  • @tfragia1
    @tfragia1 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Physics books make it seem like energy is this very simple and obvious concept, but it's clear from the history that it wasn't. 🙂 Thanks Kathy. I'm a new subscriber. 👍

    • @V7B817
      @V7B817 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      They also made the Newton's three laws of motion looks so obvious but completely failed to describe how it was a revolutionary idea

  • @dnaphysics
    @dnaphysics 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Wonderful history! Thank you, Kathy.
    I wish we could add just a bit more to the video to say how the brilliant Emmy Noether came along in 1918 and reconnected energy and momentum into something remarkably simple. She showed that the conservation of energy is just another way of saying that physical laws don’t change over time, and that conservation of momentum is just another way of saying that physical laws don’t change with position in space. Then we could have started and ended with two brilliant women, Emilie Chatelet and Emmy Noether!

  • @chrohcl
    @chrohcl 3 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    I absolutely love this. It must take a lot of thoughts to be able to chain so many names and discoveries together in such a clear and smooth manner. No, I wouldn't find this too long to listen to. Thanks a lot for the video. Liked and subscribed.

  • @Zamicol
    @Zamicol 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I'm re-watching some of your older videos. I love your presentation! You're excellent at what you do. Thank you Kathy!

  • @GoCoyote
    @GoCoyote 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I wish I had had this in school as I grew up! I hope many teachers are using these to teach with. Fun, engaging, and instructive. Seeing how ideas and discoveries are interwoven with the people and knowledge of their times is one of the most important parts of history.

  • @keacoq
    @keacoq 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Oh no, the others are shorter. But this was soooo good. Amazing that you identified all these connections, worked out the important bits, explained it all, and added some human interest background, all in so short a video.

  • @johngough2958
    @johngough2958 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I used to work in the midlands of England where people used to talk about Joule's beer - except they always pronounced it as "~Jowl's beer". Some of these were physicists and never made the connection between Joule's beer and James Joule (despite knowing he did his experiments in a brewery) until I pointed it out. The webpage you showed of Joule Brewery confirms this. So we're probably all saying it wrong - it's Joule but pronounced as jowl.

  • @hankcohen3419
    @hankcohen3419 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    I loved this. There is a problem in the way we teach mathematics and physics these days. It is that we are taught the standard results without any of the context. What you have presented is the train of thought that brought us to the standard model. This is immensely useful to students because it builds on ideas one by one in the order that they were discovered. This allows the understanding of the student to be built up in the same way that the knowledge was discovered.
    When I was a student I had one professor who presented mathematics in this way. It was a revelation to me. That subject was mathematical logic and he talked about how one discovery raised a new question and how that question was resolved.
    Perhaps modern teachers don't think that they have the time to present the background but if they take the time the students will find the subject vastly more interesting and integrate the knowledge far better than simply presenting the final result.

    • @zray2937
      @zray2937 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Strong disagree. Physics is taught with a modern (refined and distilled) train of thought based on general principles that can be inferred from observable facts the students can replicate in their lab classes. The historical train of thought of any field in physics is convoluted, extremely messy. Learning Carnot's original formulation of the theory does not bring any insight into the know well-confirmed theory of thermodynamics.

  • @mateuszbaszczyk9582
    @mateuszbaszczyk9582 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    It is an astonishingly great chanel - as a person who has little to do with science of physics in day-to-day life - I am delighted with the clarity and intelligibility of these videos. I'm impressed. Please keep up the good work! :) Greetings from Poland!

    • @Kathy_Loves_Physics
      @Kathy_Loves_Physics  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thank you so much for your lovely words, you made my day!
      Cheers,
      Kathy
      (from San Francisco)
      ps. have you seen my video about Marie Sklodowska Curie? As a person living in Poland thought it might interest you:
      th-cam.com/video/64q1R56hFjY/w-d-xo.html

    • @mateuszbaszczyk9582
      @mateuszbaszczyk9582 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Happy to hear this! :)
      I have not seen your video about Maria Skłodowska-Curie - but I will for sure (a great woman)! To be honest - I found your channel by accident when I was searching information about Edison, Westinghouse and Tesla after watching "Current War" (great movie in my opinion) - and now I love it! :)
      Waiting for your video about Entropy.
      Cheers,
      Mateusz

  • @devamjani8041
    @devamjani8041 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    You forgot to mention that Emilie was also the first to arrive at the almost complete equation of kinetic energy. She arrived at K directly proportional to mv².

  • @xyachtie
    @xyachtie ปีที่แล้ว +1

    So good Kathy that I've watched this several times over the last 3 years. A great refresher for me on my engineering education 50 years ago. Fun to retain some understanding many years later. Love your channel!

  • @argcargv
    @argcargv 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Wonderful. You know that we should include history of science in grade school history. I think it would help to improve the approach-ability of science if we all knew these back stories. I have been binge watching your series after discovering you. You are a great storyteller!

  • @danielreschke2312
    @danielreschke2312 ปีที่แล้ว

    I'm a Johnny come lately to this channel. However I love everything about this presentation and information. In my young life I choose medical over engineering, and I only wish I could have had this speaker as a teacher back then.

  • @susbedoo
    @susbedoo 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    You are doing a great work. Thanks for sharing this

  • @ordinary_gmail_user1834
    @ordinary_gmail_user1834 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    This kind of things should be taught to all future engineers and scientists. People may think the laws of thermodynamics are easy but in fact, they are really the epitome of physical and philosophical thinking beyond the simple mathematical expression. Love this.

  • @feraudyh
    @feraudyh 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This is addictive. But more importantly it really shines a lot of light on my understanding of physics.

  • @NME10E
    @NME10E 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Amazing video Kathy! I’m self learning mathematics and although my initial intention for learning was for design and mechanical engineering, I find myself falling in love with the endless depths of exploration the ocean of mathematics possesses.
    Thank you for creating!!

  • @MMKamell
    @MMKamell 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I am so glad that I finally found a TH-cam channel that discusses history of physics. Thanks a million!!

  • @NathanOkun
    @NathanOkun 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great!! I particularly enjoy the fact that you give the REAL inventors of things their "place in the sun" instead of only the later people who may have used the information and were incorrectly thought to have developed the first ideas about it. Again, great!

  • @q_kun1494
    @q_kun1494 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Getting to know about the trials and errors of ideas of brilliant minds and their development into robust theories as we recognise today, is in a way like filling a gap that was always there and could never be filled by conventional sources. As a physics nerd i find it so wholesome. And the little facts about the lives of these scientists sprinkled occasionally make even more interesting and engaging. Glad to have found this channel🙌

  • @artdonovandesign
    @artdonovandesign 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you, Kathy! I was waiting for one of the important science communicators to FINALLY devote a comprehensive episode on Emile du Chatelet! I'm glad this was done on your channel :)

    • @artdonovandesign
      @artdonovandesign 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      P.S. I want to memorize every word of your script so I can, at last, have the sciences, important figures and their theories accurately attributed, described and in perfect historical sequence. Again, Thank you Professor!

  • @franciscoferreiracarmo4397
    @franciscoferreiracarmo4397 ปีที่แล้ว

    Amazing and delightful! It’s always a pleasure to watch your videos. Thanks a lot!

  • @dimitriosharisis
    @dimitriosharisis 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very instructing! I also liked the Kazantzakis book behind.

  • @coldfinger459sub0
    @coldfinger459sub0 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wow so much more then what I learned in grammar and High school. I love your videos

  • @ruanlslima
    @ruanlslima 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    omg your channel is everything I wanted to find! You are a fantastic story teller! Thank you!

  • @Marce159951
    @Marce159951 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    What a great video! I saved it in my lists, thank you!!

  • @humbertoramos2265
    @humbertoramos2265 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Wow, thanks Kathy for such high quality content.
    I think the video has the exactly the right amount of time needed to cover all those incredible thinkers.

  • @howardfabio
    @howardfabio 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Wow, It took 100+ years for the "energy" concept to evolve and converge to the scientific community's consensus - such an evolution process is quite inspirational.

  • @ericdew2021
    @ericdew2021 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    You are the Scheherazade of scientific exposition. 1,001 nights later, we'll figure it all out.
    But this episode, in particular, is a wonderful one. Today, we all learn about energy, momentum, force, power, etc., in high school physics. But one can imagine how back in the beginnings of the Enlightenment Era, people (scientists in particular) were blindly groping trying to find out what useful measure, what proper metric, can be used to quantify... what? What were they looking at that needed quantifying? Everything back then was a miasma of confusing concepts. Top all that off with tools and measuring devices with large intrinsic margins of errors (especially for time). Heck, even the concept of time back then was (at least, societally) fundamentally inaccurate.
    And it's wonderful to highlight women who participated in the progress of science. She was, at least to me, a hidden figure among scientists.

    • @Kathy_Loves_Physics
      @Kathy_Loves_Physics  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      That was the most poetic compliment I have ever heard in my life. I took a screenshot so that I could send it to friends and family. Thank you.

    • @ericdew2021
      @ericdew2021 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Kathy_Loves_Physics You're forcing me to binge on your videos!

  • @onlyeyeno
    @onlyeyeno 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Mdme du Chatelet appears to have been one of the truly great minds, just imagine what more she could have accomplished had she not so tragically died "before her time".
    Thanks for a great video on an interesting subject that I knew all too little of.
    Best regards.

    • @fafner1
      @fafner1 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Realize Kathy was already dealing with a lot of personalities, but disappointed the Benjamin Thompson, Count Rumford, was left out. Rumford, born in America but considered British, while living in Bavaria came up with the equivalence of work and heat after observing the boring cannon with dull tools took more work and resulted in more heat. Thompson married Marie-Anne Lavoisier, the widow of the great French chemist Antoine Lavoisier. Madam Lavoisier was brilliant in her own right, and it is thought much of Antoine's work was done in collaboration with her.

  • @seanmeehan5955
    @seanmeehan5955 ปีที่แล้ว

    It most definitely didn't run too long. Great video!

  • @ianmcm5432
    @ianmcm5432 5 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Excellent video as usual -- PLEASE dispense with the musical track under your narration. It's terribly annoying and detracts from your presentation, particularly through headphones. If you do feel music is necessary, please select for something tonal (like spa music) rather than a very annoying loop of ride cymbals and guitar at nearly-imperceptible levels (it's just loud enough to be annoying).
    p.s. if you haven't already, please consider a video on Emy Noether and her mathematical formalization of power laws (re: 21:45)

    • @Kathy_Loves_Physics
      @Kathy_Loves_Physics  5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Sorry about that. I really debated it and thought it added energy but I didn't think about those listening on headphones. I will stop doing it from now on. - Kathy

    • @ianmcm5432
      @ianmcm5432 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Kathy_Loves_Physics Thanks - really applaud your efforts and quality, just a minor piece of feedback to hopefully help you continue making great videos. cheers.

    • @Kathy_Loves_Physics
      @Kathy_Loves_Physics  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ianmcm5432 I appreciate the feedback. This is a me, myself, and I kind of production so it is very hard to get any constructive criticism. Also, I have zero background in film so I am just making things up as I go along. Anyway, it is good to know what I can do to improve my videos, especially when it is such an easy fix. -Kathy

  • @jacobshick3775
    @jacobshick3775 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I have been binge watching your whole library. No youtube channel balances the science and storytelling better. Bravo.
    A little production improvement might go a long way.. Cant wait to see you go viral, just a matter of when.

  • @michaelfoster8929
    @michaelfoster8929 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Yes another great video Kathy

  • @rohanthakur4833
    @rohanthakur4833 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Work and energy have confused me for ages! Brilliant video, thank you Kathy!

  • @erikziak1249
    @erikziak1249 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    This video was long? Have not noticed until the end when Kathy mentioned it. And yes, 22:41. It certainly did not feel that long. It is a pleasure to watch, I completely forgot about time.

    • @Kathy_Loves_Physics
      @Kathy_Loves_Physics  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks. I used to try to keep my video short and I think this was around the video where I gave up on that. Now I commonly make videos 25 even 38 minutes long! I should call myself Kathy loves physics, History and talking.

  • @janetmorgan9782
    @janetmorgan9782 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    A great exposition of the topic. The historical approach enhnced my understanding. I look forward to viewing the next video

  • @cameronmclennan942
    @cameronmclennan942 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    These videos are so good, Kathy!

  • @kevinkasp
    @kevinkasp 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    “An instant of light would destroy all the universe, and therefore light must have no mass.”
    Dang, why didn’t I have that exact same thought when I was learning about Newton’s laws in high school? Now I am keenly disappointed in myself.
    Love your videos so much.

  • @Yotrek
    @Yotrek 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    This is amazing. So important to us and our young people that progress (ie. Continually decreasing local entropy) is a process. That these icons didn’t think of everything at once. That each one developed and refined their theories over years.
    You just inspired me to be kinder to myself.

  • @valentinsolis673
    @valentinsolis673 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Omg im obsessed with your channel since I found it, I've always wanted to know about the history of the topics im learning! This is pure gold, thank u so much from Argentina

  • @_John_Sean_Walker
    @_John_Sean_Walker 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you, Kathy, I love you.
    Nowadays we would add "Charge" to the "Potential" side of the Types of Energy card (20:07), like a capacitor can store electrical charge.
    But I guess there are other things we could squeeze into this card too.
    Keep up the good work, and have a good one, Kathy.

  • @jimdecamp7204
    @jimdecamp7204 ปีที่แล้ว

    I have found that after dimensional analysis, conservation of energy is one of the most useful tricks for testing the validity of an analysis or equation.

  • @XB10001
    @XB10001 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I love the history of scientific discoveries, and you explain it very well.
    Your videos remind me of the TV series "Connections" (with James Burke).

    • @Kathy_Loves_Physics
      @Kathy_Loves_Physics  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thank you! That show was brilliant and influenced me greatly.

  • @ХристомирГеоргиев-у5л
    @ХристомирГеоргиев-у5л 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Admirable! This is a very smooth approach and first step to enter to the endless world of energy in all its forms. Congrats

  • @josesaldivar655
    @josesaldivar655 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hi Kathy.
    You are like that Lady Emily at first. Very educated and smart. Very good account on Thermo.
    Please tell us more about you and your profession surely a Mechanical Engineer and Physicist.

  • @daemonnice
    @daemonnice 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I wish I could add a like for every time I watch these as I have pretty much watched every video of yours multiple times.

  • @ICHBinCOOLERalsJeman
    @ICHBinCOOLERalsJeman 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    this is great and very informative, I am very happy to have found this channel

  • @vincentpinto1127
    @vincentpinto1127 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Simply fascinating, Kathy!! It's remarkable to know the finer human details that have gone behind all this. Subscribed! I look forward to viewing your other videos, and loving the history, too, behind the physics!

  • @aimardom
    @aimardom 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Amazing explanation. Kudos!

  • @warishell8625
    @warishell8625 ปีที่แล้ว

    Love the details of this history and how it all built, Energy and Discover are my passions, and I could only dream one day of breaking new ground, until then
    i will keep trying to understand it and use it as well as I can, thanks Kathy!

  • @mathdeepak
    @mathdeepak 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    All your videos are really well researched. They give a new way of looking at these concepts. I hope Kathy writes a book compiling all the videos.

    • @Kathy_Loves_Physics
      @Kathy_Loves_Physics  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Funny you mentioned it. I *did* write a book (actually I finished 1 book and wrote part of 2 more). My first one should be available spring of 2022. Join my email list (in about me page) for more information or just subscribe as I will talk about it A Lot.

  • @vatsdimri3675
    @vatsdimri3675 ปีที่แล้ว

    Just found this great channel. Already binge watched a few videos. History is fascinating.

  • @marin4311
    @marin4311 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    What an enjoyable teacher you are. Thank you, Kathy.

  • @garymartin9777
    @garymartin9777 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I really enjoy hearing the true stories of the Who's Who of early physics.

  • @ecospider5
    @ecospider5 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    One of the most enjoyable videos I have seen in a long time. Thanks.

  • @ThomasHaberkorn
    @ThomasHaberkorn 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wow, can't get enough of this channel

  • @peterthepilot4413
    @peterthepilot4413 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Wonderful, I have been in hundreds of lectures yours is incredible!

  • @claude2243
    @claude2243 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Kathy, this is my second lecture of yours that I am watching. It’s really good that you dig into the original materials. And I enjoy your style of presenting the history of physics. Thanks! Concerning the concept of energy, I wonder if the Bernoulli brothers are worth mentioning. Were they not the first ones to use the concept of internal energy and among the first to impose energy conservation? Thanks

  • @benzirosenski9812
    @benzirosenski9812 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Amazing work. Wonderfull research

  • @surendranmk5306
    @surendranmk5306 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    What a fantastic class of physics history! You are so extra ordinary! Touring us through the past centuries, introducing legendary peoples, exactly explaining how things came out. No doubt, you are one of the angels of science!💖

  • @abelquiron2653
    @abelquiron2653 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    What a wonderful video. Thanks.

  • @supermikeb
    @supermikeb 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Loved the video! Thanks Kathy.

  • @Greg_Chase
    @Greg_Chase 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The hydrogen atom is a perpetual motion machine and a closed system. All atoms are like that. At time 19:16 in the video, the wiki page stating 'perpetual motion machines....are impossible'
    Our small group started with the 1798 gravity experiment of Cavendish, which showed that all matter objects create a gravity field, and put to ourselves the question "How does one proton in the nucleus and one orbiting electron - aka the hydrogen atom - create its tiny gravity field?"
    Since our Sun is composed of 75% hydrogen and around 24% helium, and has an immense gravity field, it seemed fair to put to ourselves this question of a single hydrogen atom - which qualifies as an object of matter - how it creates its gravity field.
    Further, the positively-charged proton and the negatively-charged electron is a charge separation.
    In most of our experience, charge separations quench very quickly, but a hydrogen atom never does. The electron-proton dipole is persistent, and the charge separation is persistent. A copper wire if connected across the charge separation created by a battery will quench it very quickly with the result being a dead battery.
    It's quite challenging to look at the most basic atom and ask "why the persistent charge separation, and how does it create its gravity field?"
    The claim that 'no closed system can sustain perpetual motion' is a misleading statement at best. Everything in our existence is 100% reliant on perpetual motion machines at the atomic scale.
    Thank you kindly for the coverage of du Chatelet - wow she was brilliant. She was way, way ahead of her time.

  • @rolfw2336
    @rolfw2336 ปีที่แล้ว

    Awesome history lesson!

  • @jeetanand8407
    @jeetanand8407 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent! ! You are the only person who gave the importance of history to science it deserved.
    What happened to kinetic energy formula how it got accepted by others? Was the idea of kinetic energy rational? How did Coriolis derive it? Which university or text book was the first to accept 1/2mv2 as kinetic energy? What is the story of potential energy.
    When did people started to replace weight with mass times acceleration?
    History of society's acceptance of ideas is much more interesting than those ideas itself becuase it involves realisation, rationalisation & justification to the original radical ideas.
    while standardising the S.I units how did everybody agree to accept joule as the unit of energy. Do they pass any resolution paper? What scientific justification their resolution paper reflect? If you have access to such papers of BIPM please make a series on that.
    Hope you are well. I may write you soon to your mailbox.
    please make More detailed videos about how definition of work got publicly accepted because it was fundametal to understanding energy quantitatively.
    why on earth someone someday out of thin air decide to multiply force with distance to call it work? magic? if not what was the math?
    Magic happened with the defination of momentum.
    Multiply velocity with mass you get momentum! pure magic out of thin air !!
    Understanding the original definer's justification to the definition may give more pleasure to mind.
    was momentum experimentally determined ?
    Please illuminate on this.
    Potential energy equation is based on this force time distace idea as mgh. mg as force and h as distace.

  • @BritishBeachcomber
    @BritishBeachcomber 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Awesome lady. Way ahead of her time.

  • @keybawd4023
    @keybawd4023 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Never too long! I am always sad when they finish. Absolutely fascinating.

  • @ozymandiasking173
    @ozymandiasking173 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Another terrific video. I'm thrilled to have found your channel.

  • @PedroFelipe-pz8vs
    @PedroFelipe-pz8vs 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Greetings from Brasil, keep up with the good work, professor. You simply don't get how you are assisting me with history of physics. And also, sorry if I made any mistake writing, my english isn't the best ones

    • @Kathy_Loves_Physics
      @Kathy_Loves_Physics  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Pedro, so glad you liked the video and it made sense to you even in a second language! Cheers from California

  • @stuartbaker3897
    @stuartbaker3897 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wonderful Kathy. When I ‘learned’ (really only some superficial equations but it was enough for Pharmacy 😀) thermodynamics in the early 1970s the lecturer was really good but he left out all of the slow struggle and history of the very gradual process that you describe so well. He didn’t even mention the crucial role of the Industrial Revolution and steam engines, mores the pity. Just a small unscientific addition - when Thomson was knighted in 1866 he became Sir William Thomson (as shown on the title page of one of the publications you pictured) and he didn’t become Lord Kelvin until his ennoblement in 1892.

  • @IckMotU
    @IckMotU 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I dedicate the term "living force" to you and your channel.

  • @ThomasHaberkorn
    @ThomasHaberkorn 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Didn't know Coriolis was the one defining W=F*s. Very underrated

  • @rachelbrionesbriones8042
    @rachelbrionesbriones8042 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    simply WOW! I´ll watch this 10 times

  • @PurPuss
    @PurPuss 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Beautiful and insightful

  • @eliphasphiri4090
    @eliphasphiri4090 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wow, I think history of science should be part of any science program in college

  • @stauffap
    @stauffap 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I love this video. You must have spent days or even weeks reading their work. It's so interesting to hear all of those familiar names and what they were really writing :)

  • @jonathanpickles2946
    @jonathanpickles2946 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very illuminating. My YT "avatar" is Joule's brewery on the Trent & Mersey canal in Stone 14:35. I'd no idea that Joule was related to the unit of energy Joule!

  • @SergeCeyral
    @SergeCeyral 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thx for your great video. I think that Emilie du Chatelet's most audacious intuition was that kinetic energy ("vis viva") couln't be lost when a ball hits the ground, but was transformed into another form of energy ("vis mortua"= potential energy). She was the very first one to imagine the concept of energy exchange and conservation, elaborated 100 yrs later by Carnot, Clausius, Helmholtz...
    Btw, E.du C. was a bit ironic about Voltaire: she wrote that, when in Cirey-sur-Blaise castle, Voltaire used to test his theater pieces on the small caste stage : all the castle crew HAD to attend performances and give big applause! If not, they were punished!

  • @evcaliz
    @evcaliz 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    This is amazing. Thank you so very much.

  • @ivanurbina2422
    @ivanurbina2422 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Awesome history of Energy and the origin of E=mc2. I loved it 😊

  • @bradjunes1610
    @bradjunes1610 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    slow it down for us old folks please. As an engineer and at 70 find it hard to follow you---but over all agree. Much thanks from small community of Oregon. west coast..

  • @LadyAnuB
    @LadyAnuB 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Love the pronunciation blooper: It's su•per•flu•ous 😀

  • @grrggrrg
    @grrggrrg 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Brilliant exposé

  • @meteor09
    @meteor09 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    You're videos are truly wonderful! I can't stop watching!

  • @topdog5252
    @topdog5252 ปีที่แล้ว

    I read online that F=ma was originally used in some form by first Jacob Hermann and later Leonhard Euler. Actually Hermann was also a 2nd cousin of Euler’s mother, so the two were distantly related.

  • @jimparsons6803
    @jimparsons6803 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Liked the presentation. I've heard of this French gal before. Read somewhere.... and there were a couple documentaries on PBS a few years back. I think that the questions that Nature often asks are very subtle,, so to speak. There in lies the rub: in some ways, the discovery is typically like being in the right time at the right time... if you get the innuendo. Then you have to be alert enough to be aware that 'something unusual happened,' in a manner of speaking. And you have to have the gumption to do the follow-up. So, in effect, you have to have 3 'ifs' in a row to happen in just the right way. Such a rare set of events. At this point, most of the complaint is self-explanatory. 1) the event 2) the astute observation 3) gumption of the follow-up

  • @seymourfroggs
    @seymourfroggs 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Extraordinary woman. Superb ideas.

  • @nepherpitoato110
    @nepherpitoato110 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    finally i find a channel about physics history and haw equations are found ...thank youuuuu a lot merci beaucoup :)

    • @Kathy_Loves_Physics
      @Kathy_Loves_Physics  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      My pleasure- glad you liked it (notice I am not even including a tiny bit of my high school French, because you can see how well that stuck with me).

  • @deymessilvadeaguiar3301
    @deymessilvadeaguiar3301 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I'm a Physics teacher in Brazil and your videos are helping a lot in my discipline of History of Physics, thanks for sharing knowledge!

    • @Kathy_Loves_Physics
      @Kathy_Loves_Physics  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Glad to help a fellow physics teacher. If I can be of any service, feel free to DM me (link in about me page).

  • @iacobaccci
    @iacobaccci ปีที่แล้ว

    Great work! Just my comment is that work is the negative change in potential energy.

  • @pramodsreedharan318
    @pramodsreedharan318 ปีที่แล้ว

    History and herstory becomes alive 👍👏

  • @LOL-wf1fk
    @LOL-wf1fk 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks a lot ma'am😇😇... Your series has proven very helpful in finally sorting out the messed up history of thermodynamics and energy.

  • @insightfool
    @insightfool 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wow. Fantastic, once again.