Why Heisenberg Worked for Hitler

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 27 ก.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 959

  • @fernandoneugart
    @fernandoneugart 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1148

    This is the exact moment Walter became Himmlerberg

  • @vonastronomia9298
    @vonastronomia9298 ปีที่แล้ว +317

    I just got home from the Oppenheimer film and i was curious about life and decisions of Heisenberg in the events of WW2. Thank you for this video!! It is only just now that i have discovered this channel and as a student of physics and a history geek myself, this channel is perfect❤❤

    • @burningknight7
      @burningknight7 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      same here haha

    • @GizmoMaltese
      @GizmoMaltese ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Same here but I didn't see the movie and I'm not really interested in it to be honest. I feel they're just going to holywoodize the events. Was it an accurate movie? Anyway, I love history and physics so I also subscribed. I'm a bit saddened to learn that men who were like heroes to me were either indifferent or sympathetic to Nazis.

    • @aamirrazak3467
      @aamirrazak3467 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Same I watched the movie and now want to learn more about the physicist involved in the Manhattan project

    • @daren7889
      @daren7889 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I decided not to see the movie Oppenheimer! Baby Boomer here! I feel like I know all too much about the threat of Nuclear War! I remember jumping under my school desk , wearing Dog Tags in October 1962 / Cuban Missile Crisis! My father was a former US Naval officer and scientist. Dad help build the very first Atomic Reactors for Submarines/Admiral Rickover's program! Dad wore a RADIATION BADGE to work every single day! Even as a little child , I knew how DANGEROUS Nuclear war would be if it ever happened! I vowed to NEVER have any children because "Nobody will ever FRY my children "! No regrets! Absolutely no regrets! Instead I worked to help educate people on the dangers of Nuclear War/ Nuclear Weapons Freeze Campaign 1980's! I also read the excellent book Killing Our Own by Harvey Wasserman! I remember Three Mile Island , Chernobyl and Fukushima! 🤔🤔🤯🤯🤯🤯🇩🇪🇨🇭🇺🇸🌊💙🌊💙🌊💙🌊💙🌊💙🌊

    • @nunkatsu
      @nunkatsu ปีที่แล้ว +5

      ​​@@GizmoMaltese I'm not an expert about Oppenheimer's life, but from what I've read, the only inaccurate thing about the movie is that it portrayed Oppenheimer as more regretful of having contributed to the creation of the nuclear bomb than he actually was

  • @UnisRapper
    @UnisRapper 2 ปีที่แล้ว +233

    This is the exact moment Walter White became german

  • @T-Rex-nm1se
    @T-Rex-nm1se 2 ปีที่แล้ว +94

    Wait so Walter White worked for Hitler and gave him his meth? I had no idea! So I guess Hitler would be Gus then. Since both Gus and Hitler were both pure evil

    • @Castragroup
      @Castragroup ปีที่แล้ว +2

      You have never done drugs?

    • @squidsbizarreadventure
      @squidsbizarreadventure ปีที่แล้ว +4

      I guess Walter was a LOT like his namesake, in that he was willing to collaborate with evil people to further his own achievements... he saw it a necessity to work with Gus the way Werner Heisenberg saw it a necessity to work with Nazis to further physics in Germany. They both thought they would come out on top anyways, even if the drug kingpin or dictatorial regime changes, because they believed in the value of their "work". Well in the series we discover that it's not the case, and Heisen-uhh Walter was betrayed by the Nazis, leading to his ultimate downfall, because he wasn't as irreplaceable as he thought, and his legacy would be forever tarnished for associating with evil.
      (Obligatory "Bravo Vince" for choosing Heisenberg as Walter's alter ego)

    • @walterevans2118
      @walterevans2118 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@squidsbizarreadventure Who's 'Vince' ?

    • @madhavsharma5297
      @madhavsharma5297 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@walterevans2118Vince gilligan the creator of the show

  • @felizkemal
    @felizkemal 4 ปีที่แล้ว +207

    Kathy, you produce one of the bestest (history of) physics (science) contents on TH-cam! Please keep up with this amazing work!

    • @Kathy_Loves_Physics
      @Kathy_Loves_Physics  4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Wow, thank you!

    • @bobshenix
      @bobshenix 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@Kathy_Loves_Physics It's a rather simple answer. He wasn't a rabid antisemite, most Germans weren't, but he was a German nationalist and anticommunist who had even helped the Freikorps put down the opportunistic Bolshevik uprisings in the aftermath of WW1. He viewed Stalin's regime is an evil which necessitated a strong Germany. It doesn't make him insane or racist by default.

    • @pjaypender1009
      @pjaypender1009 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@bobshenix It most assuredly does make him racist. Racism is about effect, not intent.

    • @Zurvanox
      @Zurvanox ปีที่แล้ว

      @@pjaypender1009then everybody is a racist.

    • @Kathy_Loves_Physics
      @Kathy_Loves_Physics  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Ahh the whole everybody is racist so no one is racist defense. I never said he was an antiSemite. I said that the slaughter of most of his friends and their families wasn’t a deal breaker as long as he got to be a 1st class citizen.
      And he wasn’t worried about the Russians getting a bomb, in fact he debated with Weisacker after the war whether the Russians would be better for him or English/Americans. So he was no brave fighter against Stalin.

  • @markolson2466
    @markolson2466 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    Thank you Kathy, clarifying known events and limiting speculations! I consider this high quality!

  • @notablemind
    @notablemind ปีที่แล้ว +45

    I just discovered this channel and it's my favourite history channel because the narrator really knows how to put together a gripping story. AND, she's offering some of her own insight instead of just regurgitating facts. She's trying to explain what's going on through the heads of each individual during these pivotal moment sin history. What a great channel!!!

    • @yeetmaster6986
      @yeetmaster6986 ปีที่แล้ว

      I recommend bobbybroccoli too, his storytelling is really unique and gripping too. Feels like watching a detective show.

  • @eigenchris
    @eigenchris 2 ปีที่แล้ว +147

    It's hard to believe this is my first time hearing about this side of Heisenberg. Previously when I heard his name, I always thought of QM in the 1920s. I never bothered to research what his life was like in the following decades. That letter from Schrodinger is also very disappointing. I thought he was opposed to the nazi regime.

    • @Kathy_Loves_Physics
      @Kathy_Loves_Physics  2 ปีที่แล้ว +43

      Me too. So much disappointment. Max Planck, however, was not a disappointment and Bohr was amazing.

    • @richardlinter4111
      @richardlinter4111 2 ปีที่แล้ว +37

      ​@@Kathy_Loves_Physics : Of course Schrodinger wrote that note to the Senate of the University. It was supposed to be private. The Nazis installed a new Rector (Reichelt) at his University who warned him of the fate ('cleansing') that awaited politically unreliable academics and advised him to put his excuses in writing.
      Bear in mind Schrodinger faced a more general threat. Von Laue was protected by senior Generals in the Heer, and Heisenberg by his family connections with Himmler; Schrodinger had no such insurance; at that time he was surveilled by the Gestapo. Also his house in Graz was searched.
      Little did poor little Erwin know that his 'confession' would be leaked to the papers! The Graz Tagespost in particular made a meal of it. But as Schrodinger's American biographer observed, Schrodinger did NOT - as was normal - end with 'Heil Hitler'.

    • @richardlinter4111
      @richardlinter4111 2 ปีที่แล้ว +25

      The 'Confession" shown eight minutes into the clip shows (at 8:00) only that the man was under threat of life and livelihood. Now, one could justly accuse Schrodinger - and Heisenberg - of cowardice. Schrodinger even admitted it in a letter to Einstein dated July 19th, 1939; hoping Einstein would not judge him too harshly. He also remarked, "I wanted to remain free - and could not do so without great duplicity', so can legitimately be accused of lying. That said, I don't know that my moral courage would have been up to the test either.

    • @nathanjasper512
      @nathanjasper512 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      ​@@richardlinter4111It's true. You might do a lot to stay alive when you're surrounded by Nazis.

    • @nathanjasper512
      @nathanjasper512 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      You think the letter from Schrodinger is disappointing? Just wait till you hear how he treated cats.

  • @indescribablecardinal6571
    @indescribablecardinal6571 ปีที่แล้ว +34

    I know that Heisenberg always wanted to live and work in his homeland Munich, and he achieved it after WWII. There is people that just can't abandon their land.

    • @Joseph-fw6xx
      @Joseph-fw6xx ปีที่แล้ว +4

      U can't blame him for loving his country no more then u can blame Americans for loving America

    • @emperorpalpatine6239
      @emperorpalpatine6239 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@Joseph-fw6xxThe video itself sites sources where it is clearly stated that Heisenberg was pretty much Nazified during WW2 and did share many of the Third Reich’s ideas. He wasn’t just a patriot who stayed out of his love for Germany.

    • @sandisteinberg731
      @sandisteinberg731 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Munich is a city, not a 'homeland.'

    • @Hardik7024
      @Hardik7024 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@sandisteinberg731 my ni**a he means to say Munich is the location of Heisenberg's home

  • @danielstingi6572
    @danielstingi6572 ปีที่แล้ว +22

    Such a great combo of learning science + the history behind it. New subscriber and loving all of your videos!

  • @josephpadula2283
    @josephpadula2283 2 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    During the height of the Cold War, how did American rocket scientists speak to top Russian scientists?
    They spoke in their native language, German!

    • @Kathy_Loves_Physics
      @Kathy_Loves_Physics  2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      “Once the rockets go up, who cares where they go down that’s someone else’s department,” said Werner con Braun.

    • @bootstrapperwilson7687
      @bootstrapperwilson7687 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Is "con Braun" a deliberate joke? If so, lol. BTW, loved this vid; please don't stop (and consider publishing a book. Please)

    • @gpwgpw555
      @gpwgpw555 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@bootstrapperwilson7687 She Is

    • @givenfirstnamefamilyfirstn3935
      @givenfirstnamefamilyfirstn3935 ปีที่แล้ว

      Was it written in the ‘Right Stuff’ where Americans caustically referred to ‘Rocket City’, Alabama as _Hunsville?_

    • @deanschulze3129
      @deanschulze3129 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Ha!
      That reminds me of the line in "The Right Stuff" where someone says that the Russians have German scientists working on their rocket program. Werner Von Braun replies 'Our Germans are better than their Germans.'

  • @chriscampbell2235
    @chriscampbell2235 4 ปีที่แล้ว +39

    Great video! Well researched and put together. And you’re very comfortable in camera. You just earned a subscriber, and I look forward to your future videos!

  • @MichaelSmith-ht7mw
    @MichaelSmith-ht7mw ปีที่แล้ว +8

    To be fair to Schrödinger he was in a very difficult position and was in danger of getting killed by the regime. He did later privately apologise to his friend Einstein for what he said.

  • @x000s2
    @x000s2 4 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    They really need to make a TV or something about 20th century physicists. It's a TV drama show or something that wrote itself already.

  • @improvemento
    @improvemento 4 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    nobody:
    not a single living cell:
    Kathy: *reinventing science*

  • @lifewalk244
    @lifewalk244 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    As a student of physics and history myself I think it is important to say that Heisenberg did exactly what he said was the reason he did not leave Germany. He said " after all this war and tragedy is over, there still should be science in Germany and how could this be if everyone left" He was not blaming people that left and contemplated it himself (see his talk with Planck).
    After the war he was one of the founding fathers of what is now known as the Max Planck society.
    We never know if his intentions of the uran club were bad (trying to develop the bomb) or good (trying to derail or slow down all efforts).

    • @koolaidblack7697
      @koolaidblack7697 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Why would developing the bomb be bad? Were the people who developed the bombs in the US and Soviet Union respectively bad people? Were they operating under different motivations from him?

    • @Kathy_Loves_Physics
      @Kathy_Loves_Physics  ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Why would being the first to develop a bomb slow down making a bomb? The Americans only put money into it when they realized 2 years after Heisenberg started that they were stockpiling Uranium and Plutonium.
      If Heisenberg was forced to work on the bomb (which he never claimed instead saying he volunteered) and wanted to derail it, why not just ask for a lot less Uranium? He could have single-handedly stopped the Manhattan Project before it started. And still been treated like a rock star by the Nazi’s (trips to Switzerland and Paris and used as PR in occupied counties.)
      Planck kept science in Germany. And didn’t lose his humanity in the process. That is why Lise Meitner said that “no one did more to fight Hitler than this 80 year old man” and that “they should force Heisenberg and people like him to see what they have done [in the camps] for themselves. What Heisenberg did in Copenhagen is unforgivable” (mind you, that letter was before the bomb, she was talking about Heisenberg promoting the Nazis publicly in 1941.

    • @Kathy_Loves_Physics
      @Kathy_Loves_Physics  ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Yes they were. The US scientists were trying to build a bomb before Hitler got one and became ruler of the world. Heisenberg was trying to make a bomb so he could be a 1st class citizen in Nazi Germany (and he would have been fine if he had refused by saying it wasn’t possible- Otto Hahn didn’t work on the bomb and he was totally fine).

    • @lifewalk244
      @lifewalk244 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Kathy_Loves_Physics wow you claim that all this is proven? What happened in Copenhagen was never totally clear. I am not saying that Heisenberg did not have the intention to build a bomb. I am just saying we just do not know the facts are not clear.

    • @derekp2674
      @derekp2674 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@Kathy_Loves_Physics The Germans were definitely not stockpiling plutonium in WW2 - they had no means of producing it.
      They did do their best to stockpile natural uranium and to chemically and metallurgically purify it into reactor grade material.
      But, due to the division of their limited stocks of reactor grade uranium and heavy water between different competing research groups, I don't think they could ever have made a working atomic pile

  • @howardturner4939
    @howardturner4939 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Just discovered this channel as I wanted to know more about Heisenberg. Just subscribed! Your presentation is engaging, fun and full of information! Hoping you've done loads of these!

  • @FarhanAmin1994
    @FarhanAmin1994 2 ปีที่แล้ว +23

    Kathy, your videos are amazing and this one, especially awesome! My one request to you is if you could provide a list of references/bibliography for the information you used for the video

  • @mrsrjlupin3650
    @mrsrjlupin3650 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Here's one for you, Wilhelm Lenz (born 1888 in Frankfurt to an Annie Wecklein, herself born in 1871) worked under Arnold Sommerfeld and came up with a theory regarding spin number and ferromagnetism.
    All that would just be a fact, however Annie Wecklein was also Erwin and Werner Heisenberg's mother and married to August Heisenberg, Werner Heisenberg also studied physics under Sommerfeld having transferred to him from mathematics, plus later research was applying matrix mechanics to ferromagnetism
    I have only found one reference to Wilhelm Lenz being related to the Heisenberg family but it struck me as interesting that two research areas linked both men, which caused me to search for Wilhelm Lenz, only to discover his mom is Heisenberg's mom!

  • @theklaus7436
    @theklaus7436 3 ปีที่แล้ว +34

    It is perhaps the most hard of your stories to watch. You are so good I in a sense felt I was in Germany at this time. I knew some of this before but it is not his finest hour and I can’t deny his genius but his legacy will always be entangled with his lack of empathy that is certain. Retrospect it’s easy for me to judge him. But as mentioned the uncertainty principle father is a truly paradox of uncertainty. Nice comments. At in my part of the world we could use more of that.

    • @goedelite
      @goedelite 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Like many physicists of his time and after, he was a political fool! Some comfort may lie in the fact that many bright people are politically idealistic. They let themselves be tools of their governments. Some do it for prestige; some do it because they were raised in the mythologies that governments propagate in schools.

    • @daren7889
      @daren7889 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      German - Swiss American here ! Teacher, 37 years! It is always a good idea to Question Authority! ALWAYS! FASCISTS just want you to blindly follow and obey ! IMHO! 🤔🤯🇩🇪🇨🇭🇺🇸🌊💙🌊💙🌊💙🌊💙🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊

    • @indescribablecardinal6571
      @indescribablecardinal6571 ปีที่แล้ว

      Keep in mind that he founded a marriage and a familiy in the WWII gap. He did the bare minimum for staying fine, and yes, Heisenberg lacked of empathy to thirds apart from his family, but he was also a victim of a dictatorship, playing a role he didn't want for survival (the proof is that he got depressed the rest of his life after WWII, not proud of his actions certainly). His patriotism and love for his homeland led him to this defensive status.

  • @49commander
    @49commander 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Wow, great work! I like your combo of Physics and History.

  • @liberalaccidental
    @liberalaccidental 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Great video as always. Minor point: I believe Leipzig is pronounced “laipzig”

    • @bullhaddha
      @bullhaddha 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes, well, it's even harder for native english speakers, there's a hard 'ts' after the 'p'. I did not immediately recognize what she meant. Though, fun fact, in the old books Leipzig is referenced in latin as 'Lipsia'.

    • @malcolmlugg9843
      @malcolmlugg9843 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Lype-tz-ik

  • @fredsottile528
    @fredsottile528 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Forgiving her biases and editorial commentary, this lady is an excellent storyteller. She has helped me learn. Brava.

  • @BrunoRegno
    @BrunoRegno 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I know the history... Yet you managed to pull a riveting cliffhanger. Hats off to you and your wonderful storytelling powers.

  • @alainbellemare2168
    @alainbellemare2168 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    never get tired of listening to 19 and 20 th century history of physics , these guys and gals , were genius , and all that without computers

    • @gpwgpw555
      @gpwgpw555 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      They were playing pool with the lights off.

    • @lembkamb
      @lembkamb ปีที่แล้ว

      They were basically building atomic bomb with just calculator

  • @anehakansson7771
    @anehakansson7771 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Excellent video. Just a margin note, the fact that Lise Meitner did not receive the Nobel Prize is a disgrace of rank. An example of the policy of appeasement in Sweden.

    • @gpwgpw555
      @gpwgpw555 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I do not have a source and I am not sure that it is completely true, but during the Nazi regime, only Germans won the Nobel Prize.

    • @anehakansson7771
      @anehakansson7771 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@gpwgpw555 this is not entirely correct, although several german physicists won the prize during that period and for good reasons. No prizes were awarded between 1940-1942.

    • @richardlinter4111
      @richardlinter4111 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Meitner's American biographer looked into this with other experts, when the Nobel archives were unsealed. Their joint verdict: "Meitner's exclusion from the chemistry award may well be summarized as a mixture of disciplinary bias, political obtuseness, ignorance, and haste." Appeasement, if any, was not a substantial contribution.

  • @charlesdavis7940
    @charlesdavis7940 ปีที่แล้ว +37

    Excellent video. Science would appeal to so many more young students if it were taught from a historic perspective. Great work, as usual. 👍

    • @RobertoCarlos-tn1iq
      @RobertoCarlos-tn1iq ปีที่แล้ว

      remember that the winners write history.

    • @Kathy_Loves_Physics
      @Kathy_Loves_Physics  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @RobertoCarlos-tn1iq Germany lost so why do we let the people who willingly worked for Hitler write the narrative?

    • @karmiliaandrade9508
      @karmiliaandrade9508 ปีที่แล้ว

      I never thought about it like this but that makes so much sense

  • @chyldstudios
    @chyldstudios ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I stumbled upon your video after reading "The Making of the Atomic Bomb". I too love physics and history and the history of physics.

  • @stevesurprenant1005
    @stevesurprenant1005 ปีที่แล้ว

    Love your research, your condensed version, and your presentation in these videos. Always helpful and insightful and enjoyable! Thanks Kathy!!

  • @Tacos_Mx
    @Tacos_Mx 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Waltuh

  • @snitox
    @snitox ปีที่แล้ว +2

    This is one of the top 3 channels I've discovered. Thank you for your hard work.

  • @yves2348
    @yves2348 2 ปีที่แล้ว +41

    This was told to me by the son of one of the people that kept an eye on Heisenberg and his team in captivity in Britain back then. I don´t know if this story is true. Just telling you what I learned.
    During their time in England, Heisenberg and his colleagues were monitored very very closely, there were hidden microphones everywere am every word they said was recorded. When news broke on the atomic bombs on Japan, they exclaimed something like "How on Earth did they do that ?" ... One testimony said that Heidelberg answered : "Not that hard, look.." After which he make notes on a piece of paper (which was retrieved from the trash of course) supposedly explaining how the Americans did the job... It seemed Heisenberg had changed his mind during the war after all, and deliberately slowed down the research on the German A bomb.

    • @Kathy_Loves_Physics
      @Kathy_Loves_Physics  2 ปีที่แล้ว +24

      This is how the story has been told, especially by Heisenberg, but you can actually read the transcripts from the farmhouse yourself and see what he actually said which was basically “I can’t believe the people who discovered this in the first place cannot figure out how the Americans made the bomb”.
      The farmhouse by the way had plenty of paper and they actually held colloquia to discuss their research.

    • @fredcollins8919
      @fredcollins8919 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Good

    • @derekp2674
      @derekp2674 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      After the war, Heisenberg hinted that he had worked to slow the pace of the German research programme. He was a smart guy, so he would have probably have said that, even if it was not true.
      I think the Farm Hall transcripts show that the Germans interned there were quite surprised by the revelation of the allied atom bomb. They had been hoping to sell their valuable skills and knowledge to the allied victors and then suddenly discovered that they weren't so unique and valuable after all.

    • @derekp2674
      @derekp2674 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@ravanpee1325 Once they knew it was possible, the interned Germans scientists would have easily been able to figure out how it was done.
      But nothing in the Farm Hall transcripts suggests that, before that, the Germans had well developed concept designs for atom bombs.
      I've also read the redacted and published version of LA-1, the Los Alamos Primer. That shows how the required physics is really fairly simple.
      The technical and industrial capacities required to turn those ideas into a working bomb were another matter though.

  • @debjithoreroy1769
    @debjithoreroy1769 ปีที่แล้ว

    Miss these kinds of genuine detailed videos nowadays...
    Thank you 💯

  • @OddHominum
    @OddHominum ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Perfect for post-Oppenheimer,
    Great coverage ❤

  • @jaypesca8752
    @jaypesca8752 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    I just discovered your channel. A great channel. I have not watched the next video yet (it's past midnight here), but Teller suggested in an interview that Heisenberg was dragging his feet on German bomb development. Perhaps this is an indication that Heisenberg was warning Bohr and the rest of the world (to motivate them to hurry up) in what he said at the meeting in Denmark.

    • @robewalt2
      @robewalt2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I have read this from various sources and came to the same conclusion. Unlike what many of these unread viewers watching this video may suggest "as being disappointed in Heisenberg" for staying in Germany. He was not there for the Nazis or any political movement. He could do more in theoretical physics staying in Germany as the top physicist. He had more power in Germany and could be more of an influence there than outside of it. Heisenberg delaying the bomb is a far more powerful position than being on the outside (with less resources and advancement) racing against the top physics community at the time.

  • @gautamsengupta1553
    @gautamsengupta1553 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Just discovered your amazing video! Thank you very much!

  • @dnaphysics
    @dnaphysics 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Thanks Kathy. Amazing, fascinating, troubling, and disturbing history. These humans are a confusing species. Thanks for shedding some light on them.

  • @jamespowell1442
    @jamespowell1442 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    As always,another first rate video,keep up the great work!!

  • @justanotherguy469
    @justanotherguy469 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Great video. Very informative and very entertaining. Thank you.

  • @atg131000
    @atg131000 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Schrodinger demonstrated equivalence of both methods in his 1926 paper
    “On the Relation between the Quantum Mechanics of Heisenberg, Born, and Jordan, and that of Schrodinger”
    He wrote
    “the very intimate inner connection between Heisenberg’s quantum mechanics and my wave mechanics will be disclosed.
    From the formal mathematical standpoint one might well speak of the identity of the two theories “

  • @WaskiSquirrel
    @WaskiSquirrel 4 ปีที่แล้ว +35

    I've been looking forward to this. I read several books on him that suggested several things about him: maybe he didn't want Germany to get the bomb and undermined the project. Maybe he was just a bad leader of a project. Maybe he was focused on being top dog in German physics after the war and would do anything to get that. I look forward to hearing your conclusions in the next video. I'm still....uncertain!

    • @Kathy_Loves_Physics
      @Kathy_Loves_Physics  4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      WaskiSquirrel I’ve gotten pretty negative on Heisenberg but see if you agree with my next video.

    • @doilyhead
      @doilyhead 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@Kathy_Loves_Physics What if the Americans secretly "recruited" him....

    • @riazhassan6570
      @riazhassan6570 2 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      @@Kathy_Loves_Physics Can’t quite understand the negativity, since both America and the Soviets whisked away many German engineers and scientists after the war to help with their rocket and space programs.

    • @criscrosxxx
      @criscrosxxx ปีที่แล้ว +8

      @@riazhassan6570 yes world ignores this factor

    • @jige1225
      @jige1225 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@criscrosxxx no, world does not

  • @Heisenberg-SayTheName
    @Heisenberg-SayTheName 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I enjoyed every second of the video.
    you earned yourself a new subscriber, Kathy.
    keep up the great work.

  • @alastairchestnutt6416
    @alastairchestnutt6416 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Always interesting to listen to your talks. Thanks

  • @RobertRodgers-r5h
    @RobertRodgers-r5h ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Outstanding Research and Presentation! Thank You!

  • @craigfitzsimmons676
    @craigfitzsimmons676 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    What an enigmatic man. Who ever really knew what was going on in that mind of his. And to me, a great shame that he goes down in history with a question mark over his name.

    • @ondrejsoroka8170
      @ondrejsoroka8170 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      I dont think there is any question mark he was just arrogant german supremist. There is no question about it. He was genuienly suprised that someon secceed where he failed. So there was not any secret code in what he said to Bohr.

    • @niznizam
      @niznizam 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      What do you say to people who are doing the same thing again in today's world in supporting countries like India and ISreal

    • @javierderivero9299
      @javierderivero9299 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@niznizam I haven' seen Israel or India invade 11 countries, like Germany did (and 2 wars)....and kill 50-70 million people (2.5 % of the population at the time)....there are other countries much worse than India or Israel

    • @niznizam
      @niznizam 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@javierderivero9299 so you are saying that Hitler is considered evil bec he invaded 11 countries and not because of his treatment of the Jews in Germany? If he hadnt invaded the other countries, he wouldnt be called such a person as he is considered now?

    • @sreeharie821
      @sreeharie821 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      @@niznizam you clearly forget the attack on minorities in muslim countries like Pakistan , Bangladesh etc.

  • @Yullenator
    @Yullenator ปีที่แล้ว +1

    you could link to the lightning tamers episode T _T can't find it

  • @nicknewell23
    @nicknewell23 4 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    She said blah lulz i died. Perfect.

    • @Kathy_Loves_Physics
      @Kathy_Loves_Physics  4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      At first I thought you were saying that all my words were "blah blah blah" and I was offended. But then I remembered that I did say "blah" and I am glad that you found it so amusing.

    • @kias87
      @kias87 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Same :)

  • @cow429
    @cow429 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Kathy I am spellbound with your effortless flow of information laced with your ethical remonstration of disgusting ideology. Well done.

  • @_skyyskater
    @_skyyskater ปีที่แล้ว +13

    The real paradox is how such logical, deductive, science-minded people can be so irrational in other aspects of life.

    • @Kathy_Loves_Physics
      @Kathy_Loves_Physics  ปีที่แล้ว +5

      That is the real conundrum. And we usually pretend it isn’t true by either denigrating the science (like with Phillip Lenard) or pretending that the person wasn’t really illogical and craven when faced with moral tests like Heisenberg.

    • @_skyyskater
      @_skyyskater ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Kathy_Loves_Physics so cool that you responded! I'm a huge fan! I've been binge watching all of your videos. I especially enjoyed the ones with George Westinghouse. I've also become a huge Westinghouse fan!

    • @JustNow42
      @JustNow42 ปีที่แล้ว

      Not really, more than 80% of scientists have asberger ( this is the future of mankind) otherwise they cannot sit still sufficiently long time to learn science. Average IQ of asbergers is 120 but social knowledge is emotional not intellectual.

    • @aashiv93
      @aashiv93 ปีที่แล้ว

      Puzzles me too.
      I think we underestimate the fact that scientists are, to a significant extent, susceptible to the same confirmation bias and belief in pseudoscientific gobbledegook as the rest of us.
      Just look at the stuff that Nobel winners like James Watson and William Shockley swore by. Disappointing.

  • @nilucifar
    @nilucifar 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Ma'am you are absolutely wonderful. Thank you so much for sharing your knowledge with us.

  • @CTJ2619
    @CTJ2619 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    When I was a youngster living in Wurzburg , Heisenberg’ a hometown, I read his book - Physics and Beyond - a good intro book into the philosophy and science of early 20th century physics

  • @simongross3122
    @simongross3122 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    This was an absolutely captivating video. Thank you.

  • @erikziak1249
    @erikziak1249 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Why focus solely on Heisenberg when talking about Hitler and the Atomic bomb, without mentioning Erich Schumann and Kurt Diebner? From what I know, I would say Heisenberg delayed the development of the Atomic bomb, managing to dilute scarce resources between two competing approaches when it came to critical scientific research. After the war, Heisenberg was investigated by the allies, them realizing, that despite the war, he had everything to theoretically build a bomb. I believe he had good reasons for not wanting Hitler to be the first to get an atomic bomb. And he managed it accomplish it without turning the Nazis against him. He was clearly more smarter than he made others think and I certainly cannot imagine how he must have felt during those years. Ask yourself: what, how and why would you do to successfully stop Hitler from getting the Atomic bomb, if you were in the position of Heisenberg during the war?

  • @joelashdod7712
    @joelashdod7712 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Heisenberg did not work against a German A Bomb. He told Speer that the bomb could not be ready before the end of the war and the manpower was better used to support the war effort.

  • @robertsamson9708
    @robertsamson9708 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    You have a unique storytelling ability combined with great scientific knowledge.
    I wonder if you are aware of the Princeton graduate and professional baseball player, Moe Berg, who acted as a spy for the U.S . He attended Heisenberg's Zurich lecture, armed with a gun.
    Wikipedia: "At the beginning of December, news about Heisenberg giving a lecture in Zürich reached the OSS. Berg was assigned to attend the lecture and determine "if anything Heisenberg said convinced him the Germans were close to a bomb." If Berg concluded that the Germans were close, he had orders to shoot Heisenberg; Berg determined that the Germans were not close.[45] During his time in Switzerland, Berg became close friends with physicist Paul Scherrer. Berg resigned from the OSS after the war, in January 1946."

  • @kenken0175
    @kenken0175 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    So that's where Walter wants to go back to with a Time Machine when Jimmy asked him.

  • @chun-mailiu4329
    @chun-mailiu4329 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Thank you very much for this clear narrative. Indeed a brilliant man, I still remember attending a full house lecture on "particle zoo" at Kane Hall, UW, Seattle, by Heisenberg fifty years ago ...

  • @asymptoticspatula
    @asymptoticspatula ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great video!!! I've always low-key hated Heisenberg as a luminary of physics because of his link with the Nazis.

  • @inappropriatejohnson
    @inappropriatejohnson ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you once again, Kathy. Your channel is a gem of great value.

  • @charlesw9875
    @charlesw9875 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Heisenbery was clearly an uncertain man who clearly didn't know his actual position on anything.

    • @malcolmlugg9843
      @malcolmlugg9843 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      And if he did, he would t know it's speed

  • @colmgeiran3476
    @colmgeiran3476 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Brilliantly delivered and informative! Many thanks.

  • @robertfallows1054
    @robertfallows1054 2 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    I saw the movie Copenhagen before I saw your video. I got the impression that H could have ( and had the smarts ) to bring the bomb to fruition but was missing a key fact ( that he was trying to get from Bohr ) or he just stalled long enough to prevent the research from coming the awful result. I don’t know but it makes for a scary scenario that one person prevented Germany from having the bomb. Maybe I’m off base here but it does seem possible. Thanks for the video.

    • @richardlinter4111
      @richardlinter4111 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      The Nazis had several uranium projects most of which fought each other. None took the notion of a bomb seriously for long, believing it impossible for either Axis or Allies - not least because isotope separation was so difficult. Heisenberg in particular worked on developing a reactor only, believing this worthwhile in its own right and also being the only way to, long term, developing a (plutonium) bomb. The very brief period when (some of) the Nazi scientists took bomb development seriously included the moment when Heisenberg met Bohr.

  • @normalhuman6260
    @normalhuman6260 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    He went from Heisenberg to Walter very White 💀💀

  • @francescocremante3691
    @francescocremante3691 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    What Are You Talking About??? Heisenberg is a Chemenstry Teacher.

  • @KnezBranimir879
    @KnezBranimir879 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Now, say my name.

  • @onsight1318
    @onsight1318 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    aah, Heisenberg the famous chemistry teacher

  • @montigobear
    @montigobear 2 ปีที่แล้ว +43

    Most enlightening. Thanks for your deep digging and presentation. Heisenberg is no longer the hero I thought him to be. Pragmatism can kill. How does it go? 'When good men turn their back on evil..."

    • @Kathy_Loves_Physics
      @Kathy_Loves_Physics  2 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      I was so disappointed in him.

    • @kishoretiwari8141
      @kishoretiwari8141 2 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      You can always accept the good being offered. And not all events in history are pure good vs evil.
      For Ex: People in UK consider Churchill as war hero, while the same individual is seen as mass murderer in Bengal.

    • @marvin2678
      @marvin2678 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      For me He still is mostly even tho im jewish

    • @derimperator3476
      @derimperator3476 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      ​@@kishoretiwari8141Or look at how many people Churchill sent to death at Gallipoli, useless deaths.

    • @Zurvanox
      @Zurvanox ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@Kathy_Loves_PhysicsI think you are viewing him from an American perspective. To leave everyting behind you treasure because your country is ruled by a regime is not an easy decision to make. It seems to me like you paint him in a bad light just for staying and living in Germany, because Germany at the time was „bad“ and in consequence working there must be too. In the end there was no greater ramification and he did indeed help the physics community during those times, even if he had to compromise with the people in power. You in return judge him for not abondoning everything he worked for. It seems like the historic arrogance of those looking back. He himself in the Interviews he gave in german was not a narcissitic person to think himself the center of german science. Please consider a more factual approach.

  • @404-AnimationYT
    @404-AnimationYT ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Wow! Vince really took his writing to the next level!

    • @thomasforster8461
      @thomasforster8461 ปีที่แล้ว

      Bravo vince for turning him into the man we love later from an irredeemable man

  • @ch4zm
    @ch4zm 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    So Gustavo is Hitler, I see

    • @T-Rex-nm1se
      @T-Rex-nm1se 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Makes sense, since they were both pure evil.

  • @bobaldo2339
    @bobaldo2339 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thank you so much for this. Very well done!

  • @kevindave277
    @kevindave277 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Why did you have to end the video in such a manner. Now I am dying to know.

    • @tyharness2527
      @tyharness2527 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Always leave them on a cliffhanger. GREAT vid.

    • @Kathy_Loves_Physics
      @Kathy_Loves_Physics  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Sorry, let us just leave it at: Heisenberg wanted to promote German science and impress Bohr.

    • @Kathy_Loves_Physics
      @Kathy_Loves_Physics  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks Ty

  • @MrAkashvj96
    @MrAkashvj96 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Excellent video. Very well researched

  • @cr1m203
    @cr1m203 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This man reminds me of Robert Lee in the civil war.
    He was for Germany as Robert Lee was for his home state. Both were caught between wars for the wrong reasons but were very strong about their convictions in their home territories. How many today would think Robert Lee was a traitor to the United States? Thank you for your videos because other countries ignore their history.

  • @tanithrosenbaum
    @tanithrosenbaum ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you for the wonderful Video, but a small erratum if I may: at 4:30 you misspelled Schrödinger's name as Shrödinger. As a general rule, the sound represented by "Sh" in English is always spelled "Sch" in German. Don't ask why, no one knows, not even us Germans ourselves :)

  • @kartiksreedhar4219
    @kartiksreedhar4219 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Thank you for this revealing presentation. Heisenberg and Schrodinger don't come out looking very good after it. Being great at physics doesn't imply being smart about politics or ethics.

    • @Kathy_Loves_Physics
      @Kathy_Loves_Physics  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Isn’t that the truth!

    • @ayushdhingra855
      @ayushdhingra855 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      But Earning a noble prize is a big thing!!!!!

    • @kartiksreedhar4219
      @kartiksreedhar4219 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ravanpee1325 He could have left Germany also, like most of the German scientific community, which also included many non-Jewish scientists.

  • @carrickrichards2457
    @carrickrichards2457 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Intelligent, thorough, well structured and deeply interesting, thank you

  • @Keepturbo
    @Keepturbo 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Sadly, scientists selling out to their political and corporate masters despite their agenda is nothing new. It's typical self preservation. Something that has driven me away from an interest/focus in the people behind great ideas/insights and made me focus more on the ideas by themselves. History is still fascinating though, thanks for the video!

  • @MrDsalomon
    @MrDsalomon 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    A very convincing lecture. You mention "a fantastic biography that you can find here", but this link is now private. Can you give us the biography's full title?

  • @kias87
    @kias87 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thank you very much for the informative video. I'm waiting to watch the next one soon 👌

  • @lartylab3391
    @lartylab3391 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    One of the best videos on TH-cam

    • @tpxchallenger
      @tpxchallenger 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      She's done a lot of heavy lifting in order to make a video like this. I know Kathy does excellent science videos, yet I am finding this groove she's on about science, personalities, and mid 20th century world events to be spellbinding. Really liked her one about Ohm, as well.

  • @caesar3346
    @caesar3346 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    *SAY MY NAME*

    • @caesar3346
      @caesar3346 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Leonhard Euler Youre goddamn right

  • @crystalbulldog
    @crystalbulldog ปีที่แล้ว

    Came quickly to comment that loved your channel name 😄... Will surely come back to watch the videos.

  • @malcolmlugg9843
    @malcolmlugg9843 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Niels Bohr escaped from Sweden to Britain (then on to the USA and the Manhattan project) in the bomb bay in a British fighter plane

  • @timdc4972
    @timdc4972 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I AM THE ONE WHO KNOCKS!!!

  • @bhupendersingh8427
    @bhupendersingh8427 ปีที่แล้ว

    Bravo Kathy. Always entertaining and highlighting the behinds the scene mishigas these scientific minds were involved in.

  • @mikecoffee100
    @mikecoffee100 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    subscribed and Liked it alot

  • @parasuraman1155
    @parasuraman1155 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent video - look forward to more such videos.
    Captivating and informing.

  • @richardlinter4111
    @richardlinter4111 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    It is drawing a very long bow to tarnish the names of either Heisenberg or Schrodinger with enlisting in the same cause as the Nazis. My touchstone in this regard is Bernstein's book on the Farm Hall transcripts, with some reservations. His view is that Heisenberg - and all the others of the Uranverein - no matter how venal their behaviour, really did not believe Germany capable of building a bomb, nor for that matter the Allies. Heisenberg's behaviour, flailing around in a confusion of untenable positions, rather resembles a man caught in a classic double bind, damned no matter what his choices.

  • @thorstenhansen7216
    @thorstenhansen7216 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    What a fantastic channel! So happy I found it. (He is spelled Niels Bohr.)

  • @bobace83
    @bobace83 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Seeing as how Germany was not close to developing the atomic bomb, as it was later discovered, I opine that Heisenberg may have been looking to recruit Bohrs to change sides or at least find out whatever nuclear secrets he could find. I think Heisenberg was a closet scoundrel. Your videos are very informative and have changed my overall thinking on this topic- thanks!

    • @mariajoseresende321
      @mariajoseresende321 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      So you discredit all his scientific work just because he decided to stay in Germany after the Nazis rose to power? Pathetic.

  • @timloney2251
    @timloney2251 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Very nice presentation of history with some science thrown in! 👏

  • @ashlynnundlall
    @ashlynnundlall 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I stopped watching halfway. Stop presenting your own value judgements on events and just present the facts and let the viewer decide how to interpret the facts.

    • @shaolin89
      @shaolin89 ปีที่แล้ว

      So annoying indeed.

  • @IronElephantProductions
    @IronElephantProductions ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Well researched and well presented. Good job!

  • @garydirkse9900
    @garydirkse9900 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Facinating, we appreciate your hard work, research and presentation. Fighting with too many h'es etc.. Great work.

  • @timdc4972
    @timdc4972 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    JESSEEEEE!!!

  • @faulypi
    @faulypi ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This was a great walk through history. I really think that the Oppenheimer movie missed out by not including this side of the story. It would have given the story a lot more context. Great job of storytelling.

    • @karmiliaandrade9508
      @karmiliaandrade9508 ปีที่แล้ว

      Because the film was about Oppenheimer, not Heisenberg

    • @faulypi
      @faulypi ปีที่แล้ว

      @@karmiliaandrade9508 Their stories are linked. If you know the history the movie is a bit underwhelming.

  • @1DR31N
    @1DR31N ปีที่แล้ว

    How I enjoy your lectures. Great.

  • @ezeebop1866
    @ezeebop1866 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    First of all, thanks for a great video. It definitely filled in some gaps in my knowledge. Second, I don't think it would have mattered how committed WH was, or why he blabbed to Bohr. Compared to Los Alamos, the German effort was puny. Third, I wish you'd work out (if only for your own credibility) how to pronounce European placenames and peoples' names. It's not that hard. Finally, I hope in your follow-up video, you talk about the Farm Hall conversations. I would be interested in your take.

    • @DeltaAssaultGaming
      @DeltaAssaultGaming ปีที่แล้ว

      I thought she pronounced Heisenberg just fine.

    • @derekp2674
      @derekp2674 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@DeltaAssaultGaming But in German, names starting with "W" are pronounced like the English "V"....

  • @Serp_Entine
    @Serp_Entine 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    So it makes sense that Walter worked with Nazis in Season 5

  • @DuardoEh
    @DuardoEh 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Bohr knew that Heisenberg was going to drag his feet until the Nazi defeat.
    However, there were other Nazi efforts to develop the bomb.
    The first culminated in a massive liquid oxygen and coal dust bomb salted with a nuclide 'serum', delivered on a tank body sans-turret. It produced an explosion equivalent to the Hiroshima bomb. One was used against the Soviets. Stalin panicked.
    The second effort produced the first real a-bomb, also demonstrated (near the Baltic coast) to Japanese diplomats. Of course their coded message home was read by the Americans (and the Brits?). Churchill threatened Hitler with a carpet of anthrax bombs recently 'perfected' by the US. In any event Hitler declined to use it as he saw it as an Armageddon bomb.
    Around this time, IMHO, the SS saw their chance to escape the coming defeat by arranging an exchange: Safety for the SS 'machine' plus thousands of elite Nazi scientists (Project Paperclip) in the US for 530 Kg U235 (wrapped in Au) plus the trigger technology that the Americans were unable to develop.
    The A-materiel was delivered by a U-boat (U234) to the US Navy (near the Grand Banks) as soon as the order came for all U-boats to surrender.
    It is said that the Hiroshima bomb was an actual German device used because the Americans had warned the gov't in May 1945 that they wouldn't have enough U235 for even a test device by the date required (because they were putting more effort on their Pu design?).
    FYI: The Imperial Navy had the Japanese A-bomb finished at their N Korean facility just days before their surrender. They unofficially detonated it near a N Korean island just to see if it would actually work. It was 'in the papers; in 1953, since memory-holed?
    Without the Nazis, the Americans get the bronze.

    • @malcolmlugg9843
      @malcolmlugg9843 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Sorry most of that is bunkum. Try educating yourself on the MAUD project

    • @derekp2674
      @derekp2674 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@malcolmlugg9843 I agree.
      I think it is clear that the Germans never developed productions plants capable of enriching natural uranium to military grade.
      They did manage to chemically purify natural uranium to reactor grade.
      If the submarine U234 was carrying a consignment of the latter when it surrendered to the US, it would have been useful to the US program, either a fuel for the Hanford piles or as raw material for enrichment at Oak Ridge.