Really good looking car in an outside. When you drive a car for the first time it always feel a bit weird untill you get used to it. We are getting ripped off by the major manufacturers.
Think your getting clouded judgement by electronic gadgets. Toyota tax is very high with low tech but reliability is very high and parts network all over Australia. A 3T vehicle with 400kg payload is poor compared to Prado with 760kg payload. Take 300kg off for ball weight you may not even fit driver in Tank. Fuel tank, you can’t get long range because battery is in back under rear, Prado has 150L & L300 has 130L.
Made in China crap is a total ripped off when after 3yrs of daily use it will breakdown while the paint looks fairly new. So for me no to this made in china suv
@@bushmagpie3312 Kerb weight for the GWM Tank 500 Hybrid in Australia is 2,605kg. GVM is 3,395kg. So payload (including driver) is 790kg. Prado VX (what you need to have similar inclusions to the Tank 500) kerb weight is 2,305kg (with tyre on the back like the Tank 500). GVM is 2,990kg. So payload is 685kg. So you're incorrect on payload. Re fuel tank you're right but then the extra weight comes off the payload as the Toyota kerb weight is only with the main tank full. Re dealerships am pretty sure GWM now have over 100 dealers. Isn't an issue unless you're in the middle of nowhere.
@@oliviercoulon5196 kerb weight of our VX Prado all full fuel is 2260kg stock (kerb weight with 150L fuel) with tyre on back as measured 2years ago. Toyota website was 2280kg at time purchase. GVM is 2990kg. Towing is 3000kg.GCM 6000kg. Toyota don’t go in gadget mode, just great engineering with reliability and service backup. No go-go gadgets. Think your Tank maybe a Land Rover in disguise. Time will tell. May want to check you maths on numbers you explained for payload. Would like see the full spec numbers, fuel, range, GVM, GCM etc to make an informed better comparison. These Chinese claims as per Tank 300 fall down with GCM value when working all out.
it has been on other markets for ages. but the HEV powertrain is added on in recent years and the way they release HEV only simply because of the production scale advantage due to HEV is the main demand in the Chinese market and by mass producing one power variant allows them to keep their pricing sharp.
I like how people in Aus are extra critical towards Chinese cars, it keeps the Chinese companies from being complacent and helps them to improve their products quickly.
For any newcomer there is always skepticism. Japanese car brands have had their own share of skeptisim in 70s snd 80s until they proved their quality to the western customers. Korean brands in 90s and 2000s and now same goes with Chinese brands.
LOL chinese car makers aren't paying much attention to these paid journos, china itself is the most competitive car market in the world. That itself drives competition, within the last 2 years, foreign brands sale numbers have fallen off a cliff in china, simply because the chinese brands have caught up / exceeded them in mainstream offerings.
As someone who currently owns a GWM Cannonx-X, and another Cannon L-CC I can confidently say GWM have impressed me massively! I was cautious at first, having my first 'cheaper Chinese vehicle' however after putting 40,000kms on my Cannon-X, and 5000kms on the Cannon L-CC I can confidently say that I have trust with GWM that they are here to stay in the Australian market! I will be taking one of these for a test drive in the near distant future and looking to upgrade my Cannon X whilst keeping the L-CC for work purposes Fantastic Review, and thank you for not having the reviewer mindset of "it's not a Toyota so it's trash" like you see on so many other channels! People need to realise the Value these cars bring to Australia and how they let families with less income that couldn't afford a $70,000+ Toyota to gain space in the large SUV / Ute market
@@Drivecomau Chinese auto market is the most competitive in the world. The traditional brands are losing quickly not just for spec and price but a complete package. The Chinese car brands available in Australia are not even considered to be the top tier brand (except for BYD)from China. Wait until you see those top tier Chinese brand can offer at the and the price
With Australian consumer Law, the warranty doesn't really matter i.e. all cars of this type and price range, and looked after e.g. serviced etc, will legally need to be "covered by manufacturers warranty" anyway.
Founded in 1984, Great Wall Motor has always specialized in SUVs. In the field of SUVs, the technical strength has already surpassed that of Toyota, but it is still not as well known as Toyota.
This is on my to get list if it ever comes to Europe. Just imagine how good the Chinese vehicles will be some 10 / 15 yrs down the road. This Tank 500 is already very impressive spec wise. Reliability is something that the car has to be proven on. But design and spec wise, this is a winner. And the overall winners will be the car buyers. As Chinese brands will put pressure on the existing European, Asian and US automotive brands to really start innovating, too start offering better design and tech, better overall value at a better price point.
@@luke9576at that present price it’s worth it and remember the Chinese are manufacturing most if not all batteries for major cars companies around the world 👍🏼
Pays to know the features of a car before reviewing , there is a volume control with just one swipe on the main screen but passenger can just say turn up volume or open window etc
You can turn the drop down side steps off so if you’re hung up on a rock they don’t drop down when you open the door, you can also set them to stay down if your unloading gear off the roof rack.
I feel the level of luxury is understated by this review and not enough credit is being given. Perhaps a little disappointing in regard to driving dynamics and powertrain, but, the level of luxury, features, offroad capability and pure size is immense for sub 80k. I feel there are a number of areas where this outdoes even a 160k 300 series.
Yes it's, normal for a Chinese made car,but it doesn't matter how good it is. You will hear all the negative stuff. But people will keep on buying it. Until the US government says it's spying on us and has to ban it, and eventually Australia is going to follow.
Considering most of your comments are crapping on Indian made cars and heaping praise on Chinese made garbage that is infesting international markets, I think it is safe to say that you are most definitely a wumao. I hope the CCP is paying you well.
@@fengy9379I'd happily pay the extra 10k especially if you then got the FBT exemption on the lease (for EVs and PHEVs until April 2025)..... Would end up saving a lot more than 10k. GWM have missed a trick here
Sam, I searched the entire internet but couldn't find anyone who has done a real world towing test on this vehicle. Very keen to see how the hybrid powertrain performs when it comes to towing a 2.5 tare weight van cruising on the highway. It's gonna add to its strong value proposition if it handles real world towing well too.
Even if you're trying to say bad things about this (coz you are on the anti-chinese bandwagon now for years), even if it was 13 litres/ 100 km that is still on par or better than any Land Cruiser 300, Patrol or Prado can yield. And note, it isn't GWM calim but it is an ADR claim of fuel consumption, which is pretty darn good at 8.5 litres. No Everest/ranger will ever yield you the 9.0L fuer consumption they calim. You'd be lucky to see 12 litres from a Ford if you're lucky. And that is Diesel. This one is petrol. That's another 20 cents per litre saved at the bowser.....
2.0 Everest owner here - I usually get 10 litres per hundred give or take, just standard suburbia driving without hypermiling or trying to race the thing. Also it usually gets about 15 when towing 2.7 tonnes which is a lot better than what I'd expect the Tank to do
@@craigpodsprojames2500yeah that's not bad, it's unfortunate the reviewer said they included mileage for 4wd in the fuel assessment. When your 4wding, fuel economy goes through the roof. If they wanted to give an accurate idea it should have just been city driving and open road. Then the figure would presumably be somewhere around 9.5-10.5
Do you own a Ford, clearly not as your comment about the Ranger and Everest fuel consumption is way off champ. The GWM Tank has yet to prove its reliability which already has a big ? plus any crash testing done on this cheap Chinese junk?
Gotta say, I like it much more than I thought I would. Pity I can’t even afford the Tank 300. Btw, I’m pretty sure I saw in another review that you can switch that retractable sidestep from coming out in rough conditions through the menu.
Just curious why couldn't we get the V6 twin turbo PHEV version into Australia? It suits our daily life the best, I feel the massive 4WD would be underpowered by its 2.0T Hi4T powertrain, haven't done my test drive yet though. figures on the paper are amazing, but performance in real life is another thing.
I'm very impressed. Although the review mentions dynamics my belief is that you wouldn't buy a Tank 500 as a corner carver. As a family truckster to cart 3 kids and adults around in it looks the goods. I never imagine I'd ever need or want a 4wd that mimics a mountain goat but the fact it has some 4wd clout is enticing. Definitely will test drive one in the near future.
Matt Campbell at Right Car channel achieved just above 11 litres across a mix of driving. I think hyper miling in urban setting can achieve circa 9L/100
@@DrivecomauSam, I owned a RAV4 Cruiser Hybrid. Over 4 years, I think I've averaged around 6L/100K and I hyper mile as a matter of religious habit. I think Toyota's advertised 4.8L/100km is achievable in pure urban driving with a very light foot, empty car - no passenger or load in the boot with say carrying only 10 litre of fuel on average and driven in the warmer months. In the winter, I get 7L + especially on short trips.
@@nostradamus2642GWM hybrid system is combining the internal combustion engine with an electric motor for performance, Toyota's system is for efficiency. Can't really compare the two.
You showed how far the middle seat slide forward, then you showed how cramped it was in the back, was the seat forward or back? looks like you were trying to make it look cramped
Thanks Sam. what a fantastic review. This SUV looks really amazing. It's interior looks grand. Did you check the cabin noice of this car in terms of decibels? I believe it's cabin is queiter than others due to double pane windows. Do you have any objective measurement by any chance? Lot of people are speculating it's fuel consumption. Another reviewer on youtube claimed 11 ltrs/100 km.
I love how toyota buyers are going china bad while they sit in their 100k landcruisers with engines and tech that date back to the 90s. Oh and the measly 5 Yr warranty
Can you add a chrome bullbar/ nudge bar/driving lights to the tank500, as you can to a landcruiser or prado? Haven't seen these accessories anywhere as yet!
Everyone who wanna buy it, pls check your pocket when putting fuel as i owns tank 300 and it is not an city or ecnomical car, fuel consumption is high so be carwful and be mindful beforw buying it
What you said is correct. In China, these tanks have been widely used for many years in the Xizang Plateau, the roof of the world, and in the deserts of Xinjiang, Inner Mongolia.
In China, these tanks have been widely used for many years in the Xizang Plateau, the roof of the world, and in the deserts of Xinjiang, Inner Mongolia. The quality of this tank brand is absolutely reliable!
I just came from watching your tank 300 long term review... Now I'm interested in the tank 500's payload. Did it do any better? is this the GWM i can load up and go camping??
The Tank 500 has a 790kg payload, so you have more to play with. It could be the better choice to load up and take camping, and you can read more here: www.drive.com.au/reviews/2024-gwm-tank-500-australian-first-drive/ and keep an eye out as we'll have a more in-depth video review coming soon.
My only concern with this car will be its long term reliability. I know there is a 7yr(or maybe 10yr) warranty on offer, but I'm interested to know if after 150000 km this car still functions flawlessly or not. And remember a landcruser holds a reasonable value even after 15 years. I doubt this car will have any value after 10 yrs.
Agreed, still unproven in Australia. What is local support and servicing like in Australia for GWM cars? What about spare parts if needed, what's the lead time?
I would be nice if journalists would use the METRIC measurement system Australia adopted in 1974 and stop using the Imperial measurement system when describing size like height! After all, it's been more than 50 years now!!!
The great thing about Aussies is, we're adaptable - and while we've been using the metric system for some time now, we're pretty good at both casually describing our height in feet and inches, as well as being able to convert that into scale that's easy to picture. 😉
a bit old news mate, GWM alone sells now well over 30.000 vehicles a year and growing. Since they relaunched in 2019, they have gone from a few thousand to over 100,000 in 3 years. Add to that MG, LDV, BYD and Chery, that is some 100,000 plus cars sold a year, So, if that aint popular for you I don't know what is....
Lots of money indeed but the fuel consumption 😢... Those savings gained financially will be directed there. In South Africa it's coming soon as well. Should sell well but I can see the owners complaining about fuel consumption
I will definitely buy one but I will wait a few more years. These Chinese vehicles have been improving very well and a few years from now this will be great quality and value for money than Toyotas
2L turbo is very small for a mid-size SUV like the GWM Tank 500. It will work that 2L hard enough to use as much, or more, fuel as a 3.5L. Toyota should offer the Sequoia in Australia. It sells for significantly less than the LC300 and has more interior space.
@@Mayson568 I have a Wrangler 4xe (2L turbo + electric). It is enough for a vehicle that weighs 400 lbs less than the Tank 500, but the Tank has a more seats, more payload, and almost twice the tow rating.
@@rich7447well, maybe It depends on what you need a car for. I use this version of Tank for 2 months already, mostly at the city. Power is enough, even if you have 7 people on board. Of course it doesn’t go like a Raptor, but it’s not like a LC Prado 2.7 also.
@@Mayson568 We tend to have larger engines than many places in the world. My wife has the Lexus (GX460) version of the Prado and has about the same acceleration as the Tank 500. It just doesn't have to work very hard to do it (detuned 4.6L v8). Our Wrangler sounds like it is going to explode when you get on the throttle very hard.
This thing will sell really well once Toyota drop the pretty boy Prado for the new plain Jane look. Watch this become the soccer mums choice when that occurs.
In the real life, V8 landcruiser are still the king, you just can’t disagree! Most people driving a Tank 300 or 500 are not really a 4*4 person, they are either a 50 years old Chinese lady who don’t even have a license; or some “professional car dudes” that trying to promote you the parts they’re selling😂.
Was thinking of buying Tank 500 or the new GWM ute coming with V6 3.0L but won't even go to look at one if only hybrid available. Too underpowered with tiny 2.0L and not great towing capacity. For a vehicle this size a 2.0 litre just doesn't cut it. Better off paying more for a Ranger with much bigger engine, considerably more power and 3.5T towing capacity. Or even the new Triton with much more power and also 3.5T towing capacity for not that much more and you are buying vehicle with great reputation and re-sale value.
My Prado is 15 years old, has 180,000k on the clock and is still like a new car. So far, it has been batteries, tyres and a set of brake pads. I wonder what a Tank will be like in 15 years?
lol $2.30/L where r u? $1.80 currently in Victoria . Most reviewers have been getting 11L/100kms not 16L, u can’t go by this review there going by there few hours of trashing it and flooring it
They need to draw a line in the sand with driver assistance tech. All manufacturers do, fark chasing 5 stars from ANCAP if it requires the intervention styled tech I’m interested in the Tank500 ute version if it comes out in Aus with the V6 twin turbo- BUT not if it’s got that driver fatigue, lane keeping, auto stop start sort of rubbish permanently switched on
my jaw dropped the moment you showed the interior of this car. wow
Yeah it's good. What do you think of the exterior? -Sam
yeah it looks good now, but they rattle around and stuff falls to bits. Basically theres a reason why cheap is cheap.
@@Drivecomau not sure about the exterior. Somehow can’t seem to love the exterior design language of most suvs from china.
@@SteveBbb-y6dhow long had you been driving yours before this happened ? That’s concerning.
@@SteveBbb-y6d Are you sure you know what you are talking about? I doubt you could even afford 1 of these.
Really good looking car in an outside. When you drive a car for the first time it always feel a bit weird untill you get used to it. We are getting ripped off by the major manufacturers.
Think your getting clouded judgement by electronic gadgets.
Toyota tax is very high with low tech but reliability is very high and parts network all over Australia.
A 3T vehicle with 400kg payload is poor compared to Prado with 760kg payload. Take 300kg off for ball weight you may not even fit driver in Tank.
Fuel tank, you can’t get long range because battery is in back under rear, Prado has 150L & L300 has 130L.
Made in China crap is a total ripped off when after 3yrs of daily use it will breakdown while the paint looks fairly new. So for me no to this made in china suv
@@bushmagpie3312Well said👍🏽
@@bushmagpie3312 Kerb weight for the GWM Tank 500 Hybrid in Australia is 2,605kg. GVM is 3,395kg. So payload (including driver) is 790kg. Prado VX (what you need to have similar inclusions to the Tank 500) kerb weight is 2,305kg (with tyre on the back like the Tank 500). GVM is 2,990kg. So payload is 685kg.
So you're incorrect on payload.
Re fuel tank you're right but then the extra weight comes off the payload as the Toyota kerb weight is only with the main tank full.
Re dealerships am pretty sure GWM now have over 100 dealers. Isn't an issue unless you're in the middle of nowhere.
@@oliviercoulon5196 kerb weight of our VX Prado all full fuel is 2260kg stock (kerb weight with 150L fuel) with tyre on back as measured 2years ago. Toyota website was 2280kg at time purchase.
GVM is 2990kg. Towing is 3000kg.GCM 6000kg.
Toyota don’t go in gadget mode, just great engineering with reliability and service backup. No go-go gadgets.
Think your Tank maybe a Land Rover in disguise. Time will tell.
May want to check you maths on numbers you explained for payload.
Would like see the full spec numbers, fuel, range, GVM, GCM etc to make an informed better comparison. These Chinese claims as per Tank 300 fall down with GCM value when working all out.
Did NOT expect the interior to be this nice. 👍🏻
It is impressive! -Sam
it has been on other markets for ages. but the HEV powertrain is added on in recent years and the way they release HEV only simply because of the production scale advantage due to HEV is the main demand in the Chinese market and by mass producing one power variant allows them to keep their pricing sharp.
The phev one would be the go if you want efficiency
7 years with unlimited km warranty, it is very good for long range drive.
We have a 10 year or 1 million km warranty however we don't have the hybrid version only 3.0 turbo gasoline version.
Took one for a drive today.. absolutely sold on an ultra model
I like how people in Aus are extra critical towards Chinese cars, it keeps the Chinese companies from being complacent and helps them to improve their products quickly.
For any newcomer there is always skepticism. Japanese car brands have had their own share of skeptisim in 70s snd 80s until they proved their quality to the western customers. Korean brands in 90s and 2000s and now same goes with Chinese brands.
LOL chinese car makers aren't paying much attention to these paid journos, china itself is the most competitive car market in the world. That itself drives competition, within the last 2 years, foreign brands sale numbers have fallen off a cliff in china, simply because the chinese brands have caught up / exceeded them in mainstream offerings.
For example this tank 500 has competitors from BYD, Jetour, Dongfeng in addition to Toyota, Nissan, Jeep in the chinese market.
As someone who currently owns a GWM Cannonx-X, and another Cannon L-CC I can confidently say GWM have impressed me massively!
I was cautious at first, having my first 'cheaper Chinese vehicle' however after putting 40,000kms on my Cannon-X, and 5000kms on the Cannon L-CC I can confidently say that I have trust with GWM that they are here to stay in the Australian market!
I will be taking one of these for a test drive in the near distant future and looking to upgrade my Cannon X whilst keeping the L-CC for work purposes
Fantastic Review, and thank you for not having the reviewer mindset of "it's not a Toyota so it's trash" like you see on so many other channels! People need to realise the Value these cars bring to Australia and how they let families with less income that couldn't afford a $70,000+ Toyota to gain space in the large SUV / Ute market
The quality of GWM offerings is improving at a very fast rate -Sam
I bought a cannon L for my business and love it for everything, and just wait for the Alpha cannon.
@@rogersliu1200Alpha for my nx Ute, currently own Haval H6 hybrid great vehicle better than i expected ❤
在中国西部地区，现在越来越多的坦克300车了。一个车企的声誉、品牌信任度是慢慢积累的，中国汽车还有很长的路要走，但技术创新的提高速度很快。推荐你看看Tank700 th-cam.com/video/2idmCFrqci0/w-d-xo.html
@@Drivecomau Chinese auto market is the most competitive in the world. The traditional brands are losing quickly not just for spec and price but a complete package. The Chinese car brands available in Australia are not even considered to be the top tier brand (except for BYD)from China. Wait until you see those top tier Chinese brand can offer at the and the price
Chinese brands seem to all have amazing interior and kit. Beautiful and looks very comfortable.
My concern was reliability, but having a seven years unlimited km warranty. It's supper.
It can't be worse than range rovers
in case if broke something you will drive it in China in jungwangwangabang mechanic warehouse for repair
With Australian consumer Law, the warranty doesn't really matter i.e. all cars of this type and price range, and looked after e.g. serviced etc, will legally need to be "covered by manufacturers warranty" anyway.
Founded in 1984, Great Wall Motor has always specialized in SUVs. In the field of SUVs, the technical strength has already surpassed that of Toyota, but it is still not as well known as Toyota.
Can't be any worse than Ford Rangers, you mean. I think they have passed the Range Rover's unreliability benchmark.
@@ChinaStats great wall are 2200 years old
This is on my to get list if it ever comes to Europe. Just imagine how good the Chinese vehicles will be some 10 / 15 yrs down the road. This Tank 500 is already very impressive spec wise. Reliability is something that the car has to be proven on. But design and spec wise, this is a winner. And the overall winners will be the car buyers. As Chinese brands will put pressure on the existing European, Asian and US automotive brands to really start innovating, too start offering better design and tech, better overall value at a better price point.
Great Wall Motors was founded in 1984 and has been specializing in SUV cars.
LOL. what a joke. go ahead. buy one for yourself. you will have to spend +$10,000 ~ $15,000 to replace the battery in 3~5 yrs. good luck.
@@luke9576like with western hybrids
@@luke9576at that present price it’s worth it and remember the Chinese are manufacturing most if not all batteries for major cars companies around the world 👍🏼
The best reviewer for Drive bar none.
Tank 500 is very interesting indeed...
Thanks for watching!
Pays to know the features of a car before reviewing , there is a volume control with just one swipe on the main screen but passenger can just say turn up volume or open window etc
I stand corrected, in my defence it took a while to find basic functions in the infotainment
You can turn the drop down side steps off so if you’re hung up on a rock they don’t drop down when you open the door, you can also set them to stay down if your unloading gear off the roof rack.
I feel the level of luxury is understated by this review and not enough credit is being given. Perhaps a little disappointing in regard to driving dynamics and powertrain, but, the level of luxury, features, offroad capability and pure size is immense for sub 80k. I feel there are a number of areas where this outdoes even a 160k 300 series.
Yes, you could be right. But the pictures tell the story here. I was more interested in build quality, which does seem quite good
Yes it's, normal for a Chinese made car,but it doesn't matter how good it is. You will hear all the negative stuff. But people will keep on buying it. Until the US government says it's spying on us and has to ban it, and eventually Australia is going to follow.
Considering most of your comments are crapping on Indian made cars and heaping praise on Chinese made garbage that is infesting international markets, I think it is safe to say that you are most definitely a wumao. I hope the CCP is paying you well.
It's really nice
An Everest V6 sport is a better bet and capable and time tested.
Just wish they brought the PHEV version to Australia
phev might cost extra 10K, perhaps that's why GWM didnt bring it at the start
@@fengy9379
Just bought one the PHEV version and it is really really awesome. *** From southeast asia.
@@fengy9379I'd happily pay the extra 10k especially if you then got the FBT exemption on the lease (for EVs and PHEVs until April 2025)..... Would end up saving a lot more than 10k. GWM have missed a trick here
@@fengy9379 Add 10K for a PHEV would be still a bargain, best would be to get the V6 PHEV, and the 700 as well.
Sam, I searched the entire internet but couldn't find anyone who has done a real world towing test on this vehicle. Very keen to see how the hybrid powertrain performs when it comes to towing a 2.5 tare weight van cruising on the highway. It's gonna add to its strong value proposition if it handles real world towing well too.
you can find many test of tank 300 in chinese youtube bilibili
It's only 2 litre .. who'd risk towing 2.5 tonne van?
It's not "just" a 2L it has the electric motor too. It's leak torque is 648Nm
Even if you're trying to say bad things about this (coz you are on the anti-chinese bandwagon now for years), even if it was 13 litres/ 100 km that is still on par or better than any Land Cruiser 300, Patrol or Prado can yield. And note, it isn't GWM calim but it is an ADR claim of fuel consumption, which is pretty darn good at 8.5 litres. No Everest/ranger will ever yield you the 9.0L fuer consumption they calim. You'd be lucky to see 12 litres from a Ford if you're lucky. And that is Diesel. This one is petrol. That's another 20 cents per litre saved at the bowser.....
2.0 Everest owner here - I usually get 10 litres per hundred give or take, just standard suburbia driving without hypermiling or trying to race the thing. Also it usually gets about 15 when towing 2.7 tonnes which is a lot better than what I'd expect the Tank to do
I would buy one of these over a Ford, I have seen so many engine fails
@@aussiegruber86Ford 😂😂
@@craigpodsprojames2500yeah that's not bad, it's unfortunate the reviewer said they included mileage for 4wd in the fuel assessment.
When your 4wding, fuel economy goes through the roof.
If they wanted to give an accurate idea it should have just been city driving and open road.
Then the figure would presumably be somewhere around 9.5-10.5
Do you own a Ford, clearly not as your comment about the Ranger and Everest fuel consumption is way off champ. The GWM Tank has yet to prove its reliability which already has a big ? plus any crash testing done on this cheap Chinese junk?
Well done GWM. This is precisely what Australian motoring customers want. Loads of tech and great value for money. GWM vs the world. Bring it on…..
Tank 400 is the one to wait for and get
You won’t trash the side steps as you can turn off the auto function when off roading
What happens when you slide over some rocks
Gotta say, I like it much more than I thought I would. Pity I can’t even afford the Tank 300. Btw, I’m pretty sure I saw in another review that you can switch that retractable sidestep from coming out in rough conditions through the menu.
You guys should see this thing in action at the 4x4 park!!! super impressive too
Just curious why couldn't we get the V6 twin turbo PHEV version into Australia? It suits our daily life the best, I feel the massive 4WD would be underpowered by its 2.0T Hi4T powertrain, haven't done my test drive yet though. figures on the paper are amazing, but performance in real life is another thing.
exactly!...the stupidity of towing in 40 degree heat with a 2 litre?
Super interested in seeing a review of towing a 3 tonne hybrid van off road and specifically up a long hill.
haha!
Really good review! Keen to see tank 500 towing capability 🎉
How much of the driver attention warning is because you were looking at the camera ? Was it as enthusiastic when you weren’t recording ?
Thought exactly the same thing.
They need to bring the 700 Tank , aussies will go bananas for it
I'm very impressed. Although the review mentions dynamics my belief is that you wouldn't buy a Tank 500 as a corner carver. As a family truckster to cart 3 kids and adults around in it looks the goods. I never imagine I'd ever need or want a 4wd that mimics a mountain goat but the fact it has some 4wd clout is enticing. Definitely will test drive one in the near future.
Excellent Mums taxi for safety and emissions in the city. All the kit is a bonus. Much better than a dirty diesel
Matt Campbell at Right Car channel achieved just above 11 litres across a mix of driving. I think hyper miling in urban setting can achieve circa 9L/100
We will find out more about efficiency in future tests-Sam
@@DrivecomauSam, I owned a RAV4 Cruiser Hybrid. Over 4 years, I think I've averaged around 6L/100K and I hyper mile as a matter of religious habit. I think Toyota's advertised 4.8L/100km is achievable in pure urban driving with a very light foot, empty car - no passenger or load in the boot with say carrying only 10 litre of fuel on average and driven in the warmer months. In the winter, I get 7L + especially on short trips.
@@nostradamus2642that is a bit dissapponting...... My bmw x1 petrol has similar numbers...
@@nostradamus2642GWM hybrid system is combining the internal combustion engine with an electric motor for performance, Toyota's system is for efficiency. Can't really compare the two.
Not even equal to Prado they keep comparing with.
9.6L around town, 8.2 to 8.6L/100.
You showed how far the middle seat slide forward, then you showed how cramped it was in the back, was the seat forward or back? looks like you were trying to make it look cramped
Thanks Sam. what a fantastic review. This SUV looks really amazing. It's interior looks grand.
Did you check the cabin noice of this car in terms of decibels? I believe it's cabin is queiter than others due to double pane windows. Do you have any objective measurement by any chance? Lot of people are speculating it's fuel consumption. Another reviewer on youtube claimed 11 ltrs/100 km.
we need the PHEV Hi4T version in Australia!
In terms of second row comfort how is it when comparing with ford everest v6 second row ?
Bring a bloody v6 here
not a chance. PHEV is coming. Much more powerful and direct.
@@liuyangyangbut..but it’s a V6
@@cocoaiscool2709 so what? The PHEV version outperforme the V6 in every way. The only drawback is absence of 3rd row.
GWM need to bring that tank 400, as well as the PHEV
I love how toyota buyers are going china bad while they sit in their 100k landcruisers with engines and tech that date back to the 90s.
Oh and the measly 5 Yr warranty
Drink some more
Hopefully the payload is better than the abysmal Tank 300’s 450kg
It is better, 790kg for Ultra - Sam
How does it perform when fully loaded? That would be a good extra info.
Our drive was two-up with a couple of bags, we can do a full family test in the future -Sam
Y62 patrol owner here.. yes this will be the wife’s next shopping bus
Hyundai 20 years ago were average. Now they are relaible. GWM is following the same path.
need to know that GWM is in the 2nd or 3rd line in Chinese car makers.
@@liuyangyang 不，长城汽车也是一线品牌
Can you add a chrome bullbar/ nudge bar/driving lights to the tank500, as you can to a landcruiser or prado?
Haven't seen these accessories anywhere as yet!
Everyone who wanna buy it, pls check your pocket when putting fuel as i owns tank 300 and it is not an city or ecnomical car, fuel consumption is high so be carwful and be mindful beforw buying it
How is the car soundproofing?
Is the tank 300 a hybrid ?
If not, it will guzzle fuel
would be good if GWM can get a Australian local team to fine-tune the car
I read the other day they did.
Definitely more solid than any Toyota!
What you said is correct. In China, these tanks have been widely used for many years in the Xizang Plateau, the roof of the world, and in the deserts of Xinjiang, Inner Mongolia.
Can't wait for a review of the cannon Alpha
In China, these tanks have been widely used for many years in the Xizang Plateau, the roof of the world, and in the deserts of Xinjiang, Inner Mongolia. The quality of this tank brand is absolutely reliable!
I just came from watching your tank 300 long term review... Now I'm interested in the tank 500's payload. Did it do any better? is this the GWM i can load up and go camping??
The Tank 500 has a 790kg payload, so you have more to play with. It could be the better choice to load up and take camping, and you can read more here: www.drive.com.au/reviews/2024-gwm-tank-500-australian-first-drive/ and keep an eye out as we'll have a more in-depth video review coming soon.
My only concern with this car will be its long term reliability. I know there is a 7yr(or maybe 10yr) warranty on offer, but I'm interested to know if after 150000 km this car still functions flawlessly or not. And remember a landcruser holds a reasonable value even after 15 years. I doubt this car will have any value after 10 yrs.
Agreed, still unproven in Australia.
What is local support and servicing like in Australia for GWM cars? What about spare parts if needed, what's the lead time?
@@wcrash9361 Toyota Landcruiser has been in Australia for over 50 years, well proven.
Well you have to start somewhere and remember the Chinese brand has improved faster than other brands when they were introduced into the market.
That front end, Toyota Sequoia circa 2011. Which is a good thing
Lof of metal for the money
What’s the towing weights?
3000kg braked -Sam
Did he just do an entire review without mentioning tow capacity?
I would be nice if journalists would use the METRIC measurement system Australia adopted in 1974 and stop using the Imperial measurement system when describing size like height!
After all, it's been more than 50 years now!!!
The great thing about Aussies is, we're adaptable - and while we've been using the metric system for some time now, we're pretty good at both casually describing our height in feet and inches, as well as being able to convert that into scale that's easy to picture. 😉
Nice one
How's 70g value for money
the only concern I have probably is the resell value as GWM is not one of the most popular brand in Australia, but I assume it will gets better soon
a bit old news mate, GWM alone sells now well over 30.000 vehicles a year and growing. Since they relaunched in 2019, they have gone from a few thousand to over 100,000 in 3 years. Add to that MG, LDV, BYD and Chery, that is some 100,000 plus cars sold a year, So, if that aint popular for you I don't know what is....
Bring the Tank 400
Lots of money indeed but the fuel consumption 😢... Those savings gained financially will be directed there. In South Africa it's coming soon as well. Should sell well but I can see the owners complaining about fuel consumption
9-10L/100km is NOTHING for a car of this size and torque against its competitors.
My question is, for the same price, is there any other car that is better？
Yes. A low spec prado.
@@masoudj1185lol but a low spec prado is not better than this
Volume control in screen as well?
What’s the wading depth and will there be updates to prevent all the warning bings and bongs?
Don't quote me but I'm sure I read the other day it's 800mm
GWM should introduce the v6 or phev...
What is the fuel tank capacity
Curious what range it has
80L.
If you have big family, this car is the best budget and best bargains in current Ausyralia 4X4 market.
where does the front passenger airbag deploy? Would be great if the passenger had a tray just above the glovebox like defender
It deploys from the panel in front of dash shelf
If you want a Defender, pay for a Defender !
Full black trim, on my list
What is your pick tank 300 or 500?
Question : Can you actually fold down the rear and second rear down flat so you could fit a mattress or longer objects ?
Yes
Tank 700 makes this look like a baby!!
I will definitely buy one but I will wait a few more years. These Chinese vehicles have been improving very well and a few years from now this will be great quality and value for money than Toyotas
I think the economy is pretty good considering you too it off road as well
It’s not the highest version for the australia market . Leather Colours only in Black ?
it comes in cream/blue also as i have ordered one
@@wcrash9361 nope crem/blue also
So what mileage does a petrol Toyota 300 get?
Can you change the indicator tone?
Sane as all cars no you can’t and no need to
Where is the bullbar ?
Little buddy thinks a 300 series is a fancy shell with dodgy chinese components underneath 😅 needed a laugh lil buddo.
"..and acceleration, it's not too bad either...its good enough..."
Seriously? It 0-100 in under 7 seconds!? Honestly this review was terrible.
Steering is adjustable in 3 modes
I seriously loved this car until I read and now heard how fuel inefficient this thing is. 13L/100kms lol!
A bit far off 8.5L/100! Nice marketing GWM!
2L turbo is very small for a mid-size SUV like the GWM Tank 500. It will work that 2L hard enough to use as much, or more, fuel as a 3.5L. Toyota should offer the Sequoia in Australia. It sells for significantly less than the LC300 and has more interior space.
HEV version is 2.0t + electric engine. Same power and torque as a v6t, but more fuel economy
@@Mayson568 I have a Wrangler 4xe (2L turbo + electric). It is enough for a vehicle that weighs 400 lbs less than the Tank 500, but the Tank has a more seats, more payload, and almost twice the tow rating.
@@rich7447well, maybe It depends on what you need a car for. I use this version of Tank for 2 months already, mostly at the city. Power is enough, even if you have 7 people on board. Of course it doesn’t go like a Raptor, but it’s not like a LC Prado 2.7 also.
@@Mayson568 We tend to have larger engines than many places in the world. My wife has the Lexus (GX460) version of the Prado and has about the same acceleration as the Tank 500. It just doesn't have to work very hard to do it (detuned 4.6L v8). Our Wrangler sounds like it is going to explode when you get on the throttle very hard.
@@rich7447in Russia we’ve got several cars, that has a problem with a v6. And also on sale only 5 seats at a v6 version. That’s why I chose a 2.0.
Another thing is when we can expect the 400 and 700 in Australia? 900? Forget about it mate.
Imagine if the Nissan Patrol had that interior.... It would sell more units.
Nowadays if someone still pay more than 100k to buy a Toyota that u can get a better car either tank or patrol for less money, they are stupid.
Just want to say, if toyota could design such a pretty car they will do even better. The 300 is an ugly design in my opinion.
This thing will sell really well once Toyota drop the pretty boy Prado for the new plain Jane look. Watch this become the soccer mums choice when that occurs.
In the real life, V8 landcruiser are still the king, you just can’t disagree! Most people driving a Tank 300 or 500 are not really a 4*4 person, they are either a 50 years old Chinese lady who don’t even have a license; or some “professional car dudes” that trying to promote you the parts they’re selling😂.
Was thinking of buying Tank 500 or the new GWM ute coming with V6 3.0L but won't even go to look at one if only hybrid available. Too underpowered with tiny 2.0L and not great towing capacity. For a vehicle this size a 2.0 litre just doesn't cut it. Better off paying more for a Ranger with much bigger engine, considerably more power and 3.5T towing capacity. Or even the new Triton with much more power and also 3.5T towing capacity for not that much more and you are buying vehicle with great reputation and re-sale value.
Seriously? This does 0-100 in under 7 seconds? What you want it to perform like Golf R or something?
等坦克700 th-cam.com/video/2idmCFrqci0/w-d-xo.html&pp=ygUHdGFuazcwMA%3D%3D
Why would I or the many others who don't tow or tow less than 3t need 3.5t capacity? Please explain.
My Prado is 15 years old, has 180,000k on the clock and is still like a new car. So far, it has been batteries, tyres and a set of brake pads. I wonder what a Tank will be like in 15 years?
Seeing as they already made with better quality steel and more advanced design and engineering goes than an old prado I see them lasting a lot longer
@@wcrash9361 yeah, pull the other one.
@@mmcin719 maybe check the stats yourself. No Toyota has what this has , not an opinion just facts
Scrap heap
@@wcrash9361 I was wondering if my post would attract trolls, and guess what!!!
I think the amount of petrol it uses, I think is too high.
Designed is inspired from Nissan petrol
Rear leaf suspension comment 😂 editors fail.
Safety rating ?
Will be 5 . Not tested yet but no brainer.
Will be 5 like all other GWM vehicles. Bring tested by ancap right now
I saw this car on 3 different channels....😂。。
Give it 5 years
Why would you buy this over a Ford Everest V6 ?? Not a 2 litre turbo.
And those legacy rear doors !!!
2.0 qtr using as much as a V8. Imagine the strain on that shitty tiny motor. Defo will be is the scrap yard in under 10 years
Lets check back in a year. 😂
😂😂 tell it to russian
it already looks 5 yrs old, the interior is amazing tho
14-16L per 100km for a hybrid is bad. At $2.30 per litre that is tough.
lol $2.30/L where r u? $1.80 currently in Victoria . Most reviewers have been getting 11L/100kms not 16L, u can’t go by this review there going by there few hours of trashing it and flooring it
They need to draw a line in the sand with driver assistance tech. All manufacturers do, fark chasing 5 stars from ANCAP if it requires the intervention styled tech
I’m interested in the Tank500 ute version if it comes out in Aus with the V6 twin turbo- BUT not if it’s got that driver fatigue, lane keeping, auto stop start sort of rubbish permanently switched on