Pot Odds, Implied Odds And Reverse Implied Odds strategies [Ask Alec]

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 16 ต.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 21

  • @BKWSU
    @BKWSU 8 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    thanks for taking my question Alec :)

    • @McGavel1
      @McGavel1 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      Great question - keep up the good work! GL - never give up!

    • @ConsciousPoker
      @ConsciousPoker  8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Sure Rahuul :)

  • @timhernandez811
    @timhernandez811 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    great vid bud somthing ive been trying to understand more you are the man alec keep doing what you do

  • @migueloliveira5810
    @migueloliveira5810 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hi Alec, i love your videos, your are a inspiration to me, thanks to all the content and time and energy spend to make this videos, your blog,.. you keep me with energy to go for my dream (be a poker player), THANKS!
    You are the man ! ;)

    • @ConsciousPoker
      @ConsciousPoker  8 ปีที่แล้ว

      I'm glad to hear that. Good luck at the tables!

  • @JeffreyYamada
    @JeffreyYamada 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Alec, i think your math is a bit off for pot odds.
    You said that equity needed = Hero's call / Pot + Villain's bet. (33% = 50 / 100 +50)
    Shouldn't it be equity = Hero's call / Pot + Villain's bet + Hero's call? (25% = 50 / 100 +50 +50)
    For example, If Villain bets $100 into a $0 dollar pot, you need to be correct 50% of the time, not 100%

  • @jayhartRIC
    @jayhartRIC 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Any advanced math poker books you all suggest? I pretty much know the poker basics and I took a game theory class in college so I should be able to understand it all.

    • @JeffreyYamada
      @JeffreyYamada 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      mathematics of poker by bill chen

    • @Pokarface7
      @Pokarface7 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Are you sure? Matthew Janda, Applications of No Limit Hold'em

  • @McGavel1
    @McGavel1 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Awesome castle! Great info, thanks!

    • @ConsciousPoker
      @ConsciousPoker  8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yes it is awesome :) Thanks for the feedback!

  • @paulthompson8642
    @paulthompson8642 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks

  • @dubzeeeeh7199
    @dubzeeeeh7199 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Good video, cheers Alec!

  • @20pointer
    @20pointer 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    $100 (in pot) + $50 (villains bet) + $50( hero's call)
    therefore for my $50 in a pot of $200 (total),
    i need 25% equity to justify calling and not 33%.
    can anyone clarify the math if it checks out?

    • @20pointer
      @20pointer 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      so basically, when someone bets pot size, u need at least 33% equity to justify calling via pot odds and if someone bets half pot size, you need at least 25% chance to justify calling via pot odds?

    • @McGavel1
      @McGavel1 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      Exactly. Since equity = "% of time you'll win a spot over time (assuming a certain portion of your outs are good or you're good already)", that's why "narrowing ranges" is so important, because you have different equities with the same hand on the same board vs different ranges. GL!

    • @chieffanLJ27
      @chieffanLJ27 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      He already added in villains bet to the pot, dont count it. If the pot was 50, and villain bet 50, pot is 100 like he said.

  • @areon912
    @areon912 ปีที่แล้ว

    who is this with this incorrect math wth lmaoooo

  • @marveliciouscombos
    @marveliciouscombos 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Bro your math is off.