New Ram 3500 Cummins Takes On Our 30,000 Lbs MPG Challenge Against GMC & Ford Diesels!

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 2 มี.ค. 2020
  • ( www.norstarcompany.com ) New 2020 Ram 3500 Cummins Diesel Takes On Our 30,000 Lbs Towing MPG Challenge Against GMC 3500 Duramax & Ford F-350 Power Stroke Diesels!
    ( / tflcar ) Please visit to support TFLcar & TFLtruck.
    Check us out on:
    Facebook: ( / tfltruck )
    Twitter: ( / tfltruck )
    The Fast Lane Car: ( / tflcar )
    and classic cars as well at:
    TFLClassics: ( / classicsunleashed )
    #ram #cummins #towing
  • ยานยนต์และพาหนะ

ความคิดเห็น • 1K

  • @dennisdolecheck6721
    @dennisdolecheck6721 4 ปีที่แล้ว +69

    It has an alarm if you overload the air system.

    • @hellkitty1014
      @hellkitty1014 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Yup. Even the 2015-18 had that

    • @tanbuddy100
      @tanbuddy100 4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      it should have a gauge like a big truck to know your weight or at least air pressure

  • @justinhommel8556
    @justinhommel8556 4 ปีที่แล้ว +53

    Putting your straps outside the rail can get you a DOT ticket. When I was a truck driver got pulled over as such. You have to put your straps between the side and rail.

    • @wbball15
      @wbball15 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Then you were cited by misinformed Diesel Bears. That's not a violation.

    • @Justin-ww5ru
      @Justin-ww5ru 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@wbball15 Wrong. It is a violation. Not to mention, it's common sense. What do you think the rub rail is for.....looks?

    • @Steven-gv1ke
      @Steven-gv1ke 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@wbball15 I am a truck driver as well, and this is common knowledge that it is a violation to put your straps over the outside of the rub rail. We even had a Texas state trooper who was the director of that region come to our company when we were in the oil field and tell us that it is probably the number one violation they nailed people for.

    • @marcinjakubowski6010
      @marcinjakubowski6010 ปีที่แล้ว

      Good catch, interesting point. That's because they can break if the trailer rubs against something, right?

  • @spartass
    @spartass 4 ปีที่แล้ว +82

    Wind wont effect a trailer I tow over 20k all the time. You bet wind changes everything.

    • @TheHuckHD
      @TheHuckHD 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      exactly what is this old dood in the video even saying

    • @98Pete
      @98Pete 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Exactly! Wtf! May not effect the trailer but whats on it will and how much wind there is during a given time

    • @tortue71
      @tortue71 3 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      Wind will affect your MPG's , in fact it's the biggest factor lol

    • @G53X0Y0Z0
      @G53X0Y0Z0 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Wind will affect that flat bed and excavator, though probably not as much as a enclosed trailer. One time I was pulling a small travel trailer going west in the Columbia river gorge. We met a very strong headwind and although we would have had plenty of fuel if not for that, the fuel mileage dropped a huge amount and we would have run out of fuel a 100 miles sooner than anticipated. We had extra fuel cans in the truck bed thankfully, because we had to stop and add it. The strong wind made a huge difference, but any wind affects mileage, especially a head or tail wind.

  • @gregparrott
    @gregparrott 4 ปีที่แล้ว +43

    Running all three manufacturers Diesels on the same loop = A Great test! I agree that the 6 speed might be hurting the Ram's mileage. If I remember right, the Chevy and Ford ran at lower RPM than the ~2000 RPM@70mph that Ram ran. With the longest stroke of the three engines, I would think the optimal RPM for the Cummins would be lower than it was for the V-8 engines.

    • @carolinagoldbug983
      @carolinagoldbug983 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It is. Peak is about 1600 for the Cummins.

    • @CarbonPower
      @CarbonPower 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Because the Ram was running in 5th gear. Tow/haul mode locks out 6th gear. Put that Ram in 6th and it would’ve gotten much better mileage

    • @WilliamStewart1
      @WilliamStewart1 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@CarbonPower Tow haul doesn't lock out the overdrive on my Ram?

    • @joshpodolsky7740
      @joshpodolsky7740 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@CarbonPower it does not lockout top gear. It's adaptive computer learning as you go. On my 15' and 20' 5500's it will go into 6th gear while in tow haul mode, but thats maybe cause the engine knows its working a lot less since the trucks are equipped with 4.88 gears.

    • @marvinblock4913
      @marvinblock4913 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@joshpodolsky7740 how much mpg do you get with your 5500 when towing?

  • @christopherjilek5467
    @christopherjilek5467 4 ปีที่แล้ว +27

    I have a 17 Ram 3500 with 4.10’s and it does not get great mpgs. Combine that with the small fuel tank and you are constantly pulling over for fuel which adds a lot of time to a trip. Not surprised at the mpg of this test. Great work TFL as always showing what to expect in the real world!

    • @christopherjilek5467
      @christopherjilek5467 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      yfz450rx I have a transfer tank in the bed for fueling equipment so I dont have room for one. I think my only option is to try and get a larger aftermarket fuel tank that would replace the stock fuel tank.

    • @lynchinjesus
      @lynchinjesus ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Should have opted for the 55 gal tank. Only $550 more.

    • @TheGenerationX894
      @TheGenerationX894 ปีที่แล้ว

      You have the gas engine with the 4.10 gears?

  • @Sikh1.5Accord
    @Sikh1.5Accord 4 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Love watching your guys videos in the morning it really makes my day

  • @Marathon13240
    @Marathon13240 4 ปีที่แล้ว +23

    I absolutely love the effort you all put into these videos, its invaluable and is unparalleled. Thank you guys!

    • @MrTruckTV
      @MrTruckTV 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      You're welcome

  • @nm-qt2hb
    @nm-qt2hb 4 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Good information as usual. Nice job.

  • @LongDistanceMotorcycleFans
    @LongDistanceMotorcycleFans 4 ปีที่แล้ว +74

    Having a 31 gallon tank would get annoying hauling heavy loads. My F-150 even has a 36 gallon tank.

    • @PsalmFourteenOne
      @PsalmFourteenOne 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Gunnar Johnson
      I got the big tank in my F-150
      It costs over $100 to fill with 87 octane.
      but it also goes about 600 miles on that tank.

    • @MyTubeUser321
      @MyTubeUser321 4 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      Agreed. The 50 gallon tank should be standard

    • @richfarfugnuven6308
      @richfarfugnuven6308 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      I upped my main tank in my old F350 to 67 gallons. The range is awesome...

    • @atomictyler
      @atomictyler 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@richfarfugnuven6308 Long bed or short bed? I'm looking to up mine to more in an F350 short bed.

    • @gorybonghit3211
      @gorybonghit3211 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Lol my tank is 200 to fill... Sucks ass

  • @brentvance3958
    @brentvance3958 4 ปีที่แล้ว +66

    Your straps are supposed to be inside the rail not outside to protect the straps.

    • @casper3380
      @casper3380 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      The accessory chain is loose, that is an automatic OOS as it is not secured as required as well.

  • @jonluchessi1643
    @jonluchessi1643 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I have a 2022 basically same truck, I run mine in tow haul mode around town and on back roads with lots of elevation change but On flat highways I run the transmission in standard mode which gives me better fuel mileage and that’s towing over 15,000 pounds on a daily basis, Thanks for the great review I really enjoyed all your reviews

  • @shanebeylund945
    @shanebeylund945 4 ปีที่แล้ว +58

    Do a shoot out with the Ram 5500 and the new Chevy 5500.

    • @brentvance3958
      @brentvance3958 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Shane Beylund and F550

    • @rjterry21
      @rjterry21 4 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      @@icare7151 No need for a 10 speed with the Cummins. 8 or 9 speed with good gear splits would be perfect.

    • @justinmartin8887
      @justinmartin8887 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@icare7151 what’s the point? With the outstanding energy curve of the Cummins there’s no need. Energy from bottom to top

    • @whitebison6.749
      @whitebison6.749 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@rjterry21 even better with the g56 when it comes to towing

    • @WilliamStewart1
      @WilliamStewart1 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@whitebison6.749 There's no benefit to the manauls when it comes to towing these days, that's why they're all gone on the pickups and just about gone on Semi's. They're less efficient and causes more driver fatigue.

  • @razorsedgeadventures6599
    @razorsedgeadventures6599 4 ปีที่แล้ว +60

    I think 70 mph for any of these pickups towing 30,000 lbs is too fast. They may be able to move the weight, but controlling the weight in an emergency situation is another thing. As for the mileage while towing that much weight, I don’t really care which is better. For me and my use pulling a 10,000 to 15,000 lb RV, it’s about the environment I’m sitting in, and Ram has that nailed. In my opinion, the interior of the Ram is far and away better than the bland interior in either of the others. They can all haul dramatically more weight than most of us will ever attempt, and for more miles than most will ever keep the truck, but it’s the quality of the experience from inside the truck that matters to me.

    • @GroovesAndLands
      @GroovesAndLands 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Nice spin!

    • @dchawk81
      @dchawk81 4 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      I've pulled my little car hauler at 70mph but if I'm trying to make money I'm comfortable with the MPG at 62 and letting everyone blow by and keep me out of the clusters.
      You gotta do the math for yourself but in my particular case it saves about 10 grand in fuel over a year with minimal productivity loss.
      Slow and steady and easier on the brakes and tires.

    • @razorsedgeadventures6599
      @razorsedgeadventures6599 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Fortz DR Ram fan boy?

    • @michaelglaspir3654
      @michaelglaspir3654 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Ford Has Always Had The Best Interior of All Big 3 Manufacturers. Lets Just Be Honest!

    • @rileytatum8592
      @rileytatum8592 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      I really want to see the Ike challenge and this one with a deleted truck to actually see if the emission equipment really kills mpg like everyone says

  • @earlycuyler8719
    @earlycuyler8719 4 ปีที่แล้ว +73

    I’m like all three but my biggest expectation is dependability and warranty coverage.

    • @therapgame1091
      @therapgame1091 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Dont get a dodge if youre looking for reliablity

    • @luketurner384
      @luketurner384 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      The Rap Game that’s true, you can always rely on it sitting in the drive bc it won’t start

    • @therapgame1091
      @therapgame1091 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@luketurner384 chevy isnt reliable either... we have a winner... FORD
      I prefer the old models that lasted lifetime dont you agree?

    • @luketurner384
      @luketurner384 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The Rap Game all day every day, OBS 7.3’s are badass, I drive a 2012 5.0 F-150 rn and love every second of it

    • @dannysan1272
      @dannysan1272 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      @@therapgame1091 Are you sure that's the case with the Cummins + Aisin transmission?

  • @markegan1690
    @markegan1690 4 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    Temp tag on the trailer about to fly off

  • @Durango280zx
    @Durango280zx 4 ปีที่แล้ว +28

    Fewer gears didn't help the other trucks had a lot more to work with still impressive that the truck did that well with only a 6 speed!

  • @stevechesney8809
    @stevechesney8809 4 ปีที่แล้ว +28

    If I close my eyes and listen to Mr. Truck speaking it's like having Tommy Lee Jones narrating the story. Gotta love Mr. Truck!

    • @djaftermath4313
      @djaftermath4313 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      SPOT ON observation. I was thinking the same exact thing LOL!

    • @djaftermath4313
      @djaftermath4313 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @R AJ Reefer

    • @MrTruckTV
      @MrTruckTV 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Thanks, I thought I sound like Elvis

  • @killerb5726
    @killerb5726 4 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    Nice job on the cutaways to the Ford and GMC.

  • @loganely5824
    @loganely5824 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    We have a 17 tradesman 3500 and when you have a trailer on and you turn the exhaust break and shut the truck off and turn it back on the exhaust break will come back on as well.

  • @dillonkischuk6841
    @dillonkischuk6841 4 ปีที่แล้ว +29

    I would reeeeally love to see a RAM VS RAM comparison. 3500 with the HO vs 3500 with the non HO Cummins. Drag race, mpg, Ike or any towing test. Just a full on powertrain comparison

    • @sHoRtBuSseR
      @sHoRtBuSseR 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      HO has an impressive jump in power, even more than advertised.

    • @razorsedgeadventures6599
      @razorsedgeadventures6599 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@sHoRtBuSseR It would be cool to see if it really translates to any difference on the road!

    • @WilliamStewart1
      @WilliamStewart1 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@razorsedgeadventures6599 They pull better going off personal experience. A similar load of 34 foot beavertail hauling an 8 ton excavator I noticed the HO right away after the switch.

  • @redtitan29
    @redtitan29 4 ปีที่แล้ว +124

    Bring them all back with 20,000 miles on them then see what the mpg’s are.

    • @joshszydel8202
      @joshszydel8202 4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Out of the 15 new trucks off all brands my mileage doesnt change.

    • @rgrhrm1959
      @rgrhrm1959 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      AMURIKA

    • @jorgeosorio8459
      @jorgeosorio8459 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Josh Szydel cummins ALWAYS changes

    • @joshszydel8202
      @joshszydel8202 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@jorgeosorio8459 I've owned 16 cummins trucks.

    • @redtitan29
      @redtitan29 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Wheel bearing Looks like TFL found the next test they need to perform.

  • @chrism2042
    @chrism2042 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I have a 2018 Ram 3500 dually limited with HO 6.7 and aisin trans, crew cab long bed. The fuel tank size is one of my only complaints, glad to see they now have larger tank option. I don't do many long trips but towing my 24' boat with trailer tongue to outboard engine 33'-6" from NC to Fl keys approx 900 miles, GA and FL don't seem to have many truck stops on I95. Even though the truck gets decent mileage, most of my trip is getting that truck/trailer combo into convenient stores for fuel. If Ram comes out with the HO6.7 with allison trans, I will be one of the first to order a 3500 dually limited, and of course with the 50 gal fuel tank option. They should make the 50 gal tank standard.

  • @CGCampUT
    @CGCampUT 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    For the air system it does let you know if you are over payload. The bags will only air up to certain point and should notify on dash. Could be different in the 3500 models. It for sure on the 2500 air system

  • @kain4645
    @kain4645 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Great job guys alway entertaining

  • @paulherring8208
    @paulherring8208 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Not bad considering the load Keep On Truckin tfl👍

  • @jaydengerber15
    @jaydengerber15 4 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    Tow haul has always done that on rams

    • @nicmonson6466
      @nicmonson6466 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Their point is that the other manufacturers are adding that feature so people don’t have to turn it back on when they are towing long distance.

  • @oobiegoobie940
    @oobiegoobie940 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Here it comes!!!

  • @kanaletumlinson
    @kanaletumlinson ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I am thinking the 6 speed VS 10 speed using more mpg, also Laramie trim level with all the bells and whistles and the fact Ram is the nicest interiors in the game. Great video TFL

  • @brakel8r
    @brakel8r 4 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    I miss the days when ya got excited because your truck had power windows , power locks and A/C.

    • @bigjohn5104
      @bigjohn5104 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I agree 100% now days I truly believe all the tech in these trucks makes the roads way more dangerous! Now any Joe smoe can latch onto almost anything and act like he knows what he's doing, until all that tech goes out and have to rely on experience and talent for driving and it won't be there!

    • @brakel8r
      @brakel8r 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@@bigjohn5104 that goes for cars too...lol

    • @CasualPooper
      @CasualPooper 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It was fancy if it came with a tape deck

  • @Staki6908
    @Staki6908 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    The fuel mileage increasing as the diesels break in I always thought was a myth, but i've only bought used diesels until this year and it's crazy how much better the fuel mileage gets the more miles I put on it. So yeah test this sucker again with more miles on it.

  • @hamwallet7069
    @hamwallet7069 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Everyone In here forgetting most important part. Look at the ambient temps on dash’s when doing these tests. Makes a HUGE difference. They should’ve all been done same day, same time.

  • @leeluchette6049
    @leeluchette6049 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I have a question as you drive the heavy duty trucks in all conditions, especially snow and ice. I have driven the Ram 3500 dually Mega cabs since 2012. Summer pulling mini excavators, skid steers, but mainly our 5th wheel toy hauler to races. I purchased a 2019 F-450 for the better turning radius, brakes, (at the time) 48 gallon fuel tank over the Ram. Like the truck, but on snow/ice covered roads I have found myself fighting it and stressed. I have Toyo m655 tires on it currently. On the icy, snow roads I am only pulling a box trailer bumper pull. To the point, in winter driving do you still prefer the turning radius of the wide track f450, or the normal stance of a Ram 350, both long bed crew cabs. Just trying to be clear and direct in comparison. Sincerely, Lee

  • @usmcvet0313
    @usmcvet0313 4 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    Dang, the Ford pulled the hardest on the Ike gauntlet, AND got the best fuel mileage! Ford's on a roll. 👏

    • @bigjohn5104
      @bigjohn5104 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I personally have always been a Ford fan just what I grew up around and its nice to see them still putting the work in to make a good truck.

    • @harleyjackson5513
      @harleyjackson5513 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Ford giving a smackdown!

  • @jadebylund7061
    @jadebylund7061 4 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    I really like how ram gives you a sunny D pull-top to stuff in the tank fill. is that an option?

    • @lw6735
      @lw6735 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Jade bylund Lol good 1 😆

    • @dchawk81
      @dchawk81 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I think that's just a transport plug you're supposed to throw away. My welder came with those. Lol.

    • @jamesearnhardt8497
      @jamesearnhardt8497 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It's a "limited edition, special option" dealer add-on. The sunny d cap adds an extra $1,200 to the sticker price. Lol

  • @ottomaguire2443
    @ottomaguire2443 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Very instrumental test

  • @cjzx325
    @cjzx325 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Can you load it with the engine and key off to check for squat and then turn it on and allow it to level out?

    • @colinmatlock2164
      @colinmatlock2164 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      There would really be no point to that, it has an overload warning that tells you if you're overloaded

  • @joerivs80
    @joerivs80 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Your strap isn’t supposed to go on the outside of the rub rail. It’s a rub rail for safety if ever you sideswipe something or flip the trailer, then the rail rubs and protects your strap. The rub rail isn’t for attaching the strap nor should the strap be on the outside. Putting the strap on the outside give no safety to your strap in an accident, then a rubbed or cut strap will release the load and you’d lose the load. Same for chains. Behind the rub rails. Love you guys and love the channel, I’m not trying to come off as an ass but to help you improve your safety and knowledge.

  • @timbowhite3159
    @timbowhite3159 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Yes All Three Of Them Are Very Good Trucks

  • @amirs365
    @amirs365 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    In Canada we cover grills at that weather - you don’t want your EPG not to regen

  • @theoiv
    @theoiv 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I like Mr truck but Andre is a just cool dude. I have a lot of respect him and his genuine info presentation. keep up the good work Andre.

    • @MrTruckTV
      @MrTruckTV 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      He's the professor, great memory and he likes details

    • @theoiv
      @theoiv 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@MrTruckTV he's the man. BTW, I purchased my 2018 High output Ram because of you guys. Thanks for the honest reviews and the genuine approach to it all.

    • @MrTruckTV
      @MrTruckTV 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@theoiv You're welcome

    • @theoiv
      @theoiv 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      MrTruckTV 👍😀

  • @the_ghee_spot
    @the_ghee_spot 4 ปีที่แล้ว +23

    My 19’ 3500 has the 4.10 and it’s happy place is 65-68 mph for fuel mileage. If the truck in the video has a 4.10, the observed 6 mpg at 70 mpg with 30k lbs behind it seems par for the course, even with only 1,200 miles on the clock.

    • @LightningRich00
      @LightningRich00 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Should be the same for all the diesels. the same was true for my 6.7 Powerstroke. I would like to see them do this test for 100 miles or more at 60mph....that a more realistic daily speed for that much weight.

    • @guardrail2897
      @guardrail2897 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      My 2018 3500 also has the 4.10 and you're spot on with the 65-68 mph sweet spot.

  • @billmcewen8354
    @billmcewen8354 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    When are you going to release the Tremor review? I thought it was January 21st, but I am not able to locate.

    • @supadoopa926
      @supadoopa926 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      It's on the TFLoffroad channel.

    • @billmcewen8354
      @billmcewen8354 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Supa Doopa, I do not find the review that they advised was to deliver on January 21st once the Tremor was delivered and again referenced when they compare diesel vs. gas Tremor they mention to stay tuned and see the full review first thing morning of the 21st and I’m searching all of their channels I am still not able to locate

  • @darkelement8953
    @darkelement8953 ปีที่แล้ว

    Yup if I had the budget I would put everything to the rest thank you so much

  • @DolphinDivingChamp
    @DolphinDivingChamp 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Does diesel #1 vs #2 make a big difference in fuel economy?

  • @bretmarstellar603
    @bretmarstellar603 4 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    All Ram trucks equipped with factory air ride suspension will tell you when they are overloaded (1500, 2500, 3500, etc.).

  • @mr.darrelltrunnell644
    @mr.darrelltrunnell644 4 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    Guys when you hook up your yellow straps please run them inside the rub rail coming from the ratchet spools. Yes it works but the DOT would tell you different. Yes I’m a Class A over the road professional truck driver. So please watch that in your future test. Please verify that fact if you like. I’m for the GMC 3500 HD. Liked & Subscribed

  • @bartman8876
    @bartman8876 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Getting 15.4 just driving around with nothing right now in my newly built 2022 ram 3500 very curious to know full load mpg

  • @ericnasset47
    @ericnasset47 ปีที่แล้ว

    I’m amazed how much DEF tucks use. The only diesel I have that’s new enough to use it is my VW. It uses about 3 gallons every 5k miles.

  • @toofastnobrakes
    @toofastnobrakes 4 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    Could you guys pleeeease do a towing test comparing the same truck “ram, ford or Chevy heavy duty”, but with different axle ratios side by side? Like 3.55 or 3.73 vs 4.10 or 4.30. I hear aaaall the time which is better for different reasons. But I want to seeee the difference!!! Fuel economy, 0-60 empty and towing, and the time difference running up the Ike gauntlet 👍

    • @disophisis
      @disophisis 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Especially with these new 9 and 10 speed transmissions, I would think you could run 4.10s and gear the transmission ratios to take advantage of that from gears 1-7 but still have a couple high overdrive gears so it still handles the highway well.

    • @jnk26
      @jnk26 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Axle ratios have less importance when paired with wide range transmissions(these 10 speeds) the fact that the Duramax with the least torque and the "worst" axle ratio kept up with the Ram. My semi truck has a 3.25 and I'm keeping up with trucks that have 4.10s and I always run 140k (b-train fuel tanker) consequence is, I get way better mileage on the flat than they do.

    • @disophisis
      @disophisis 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@jnk26 interesting. But does it struggle a little more on steeper grades? I don't know how much of a problem steep grades are for you actual truckers. Probably more of a problem here in the west.

    • @toofastnobrakes
      @toofastnobrakes 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      jnk26 it’s more about knowing just how much “however little” it does make. I want to see mpg to mpg and time to time, both empty and towing. side by side with the same truck and two different ratios. Same day, trailer, and amount of gears. It’s a test I never see done and I’m tired of just hearing and reading what the difference is. I want to see exactly how much it changes

    • @kennethobando5755
      @kennethobando5755 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I vote 3:73 truck will tow very well (not the Max tow). And the truck will cruise nicely. Ive had two diesels one had 3:55,other 3:73 and drove my dads f350 with 4:10. All around the 3:73 is nicest doesn’t have to hunt gears to shift. But doesn’t scream very loudly going down the road like a truck with 4:10 will going 70mph.

  • @junehhan
    @junehhan 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Any chance that this truck entered regen during the loop? Regen will murder your fuel economy. Other than that, this engine is still 9k miles from being broken in.

  • @tradingmachine65
    @tradingmachine65 ปีที่แล้ว

    i wonder which one was the most comfortable to sit in for a long haul

  • @Big_Papi_78
    @Big_Papi_78 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Mr. Truck, not sure if you know this but straps are suppose to be run inside the rub rails not outside. If you rub up against something you can cut the strap the way you have it. DOT could give you a warning or improper load securement violation

  • @theworldaccordingtochris4370
    @theworldaccordingtochris4370 4 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    What I find in trucks in Europe is that the ones that use very little DEF they are heavy on diesel but the ones that use more DEF are better on fuel. I kinda knew where the fuel mileage was going from the DEF use. RAM need more gears and a better final drive to get the mileage.

    • @BradChadley
      @BradChadley 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      I really think the lack of a 10 speed is the biggest difference though. 4 extra ratios to keep the truck at the most efficient part of the powerband for towing that weight is huge

    • @theworldaccordingtochris4370
      @theworldaccordingtochris4370 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@BradChadley or a manual with a range change, 6 over 6

    • @BradChadley
      @BradChadley 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@theworldaccordingtochris4370 Yea, that too. I don't believe that will ever make its way into American 1 ton dually pickups, but it would certainly be interesting.

    • @theworldaccordingtochris4370
      @theworldaccordingtochris4370 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@BradChadley I don't see why some clever engineering type couldn't build one from a RAM with manual gearbox. A friend of mine use to add overdrive gears to manual gearboxes years ago.

  • @toofastnobrakes
    @toofastnobrakes 4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Sweet! 💪 now you need to test the 6.4 hemi with the new 8speed “non-power wagon”

  • @awesomebase
    @awesomebase 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent job as always guys, love your videos! So, it seems like the best HD truck is a GMC exterior, cameras and bed, a Ford drivetrain and gas tank, and a RAM interior and tech...

  • @johnayer7326
    @johnayer7326 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I have to ask about the rear gear ratio of all 3 of these trucks, were they all the same?

  • @seagullsbtn
    @seagullsbtn 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    How about a SRW v DRW towing test? Chevy v Chevy Ram v Ram.... etc

  • @Js16108
    @Js16108 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    My 2001 Ram 1500 gets 0mpg with 20,000lbs and 6 mpg unloaded

  • @duggydo
    @duggydo 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very surprising on the mpg.

  • @LozzyTheTransporter
    @LozzyTheTransporter 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Im from the uk and wish we could run these configurations

  • @Roger-to2mn
    @Roger-to2mn 4 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    Ford is killing these other trucks! Minutes ahead in an 8 mile race pulling 30,000 lbs. Using only 12 ounces more fuel but going much faster under load. Then when going the same speed 1.8 miles per gallon better than the Ram = 38 gallons of savings every 1,000 miles. 38 gallons x $3 per gal = $114.00 over 100,000 miles is $11,400.00 in fuel alone. Way to go FORD!

    • @andrewshipley7660
      @andrewshipley7660 ปีที่แล้ว

      I’m interested to see what happens with a 10-speed behind a Cummins.

  • @nunu_21
    @nunu_21 4 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Please try the ram 5500 and ford F550 or even 2020 Ford F600

    • @SMiller5488
      @SMiller5488 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      No difference between F-550 and F-600

    • @jorgelujan4848
      @jorgelujan4848 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Well apparently the f600 is only available with a gas engine

  • @Steven-gv1ke
    @Steven-gv1ke 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I would like to see this test redone with the new RAM that has the eight speed transmission

  • @DMAXLML2012
    @DMAXLML2012 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wind 💯 completely effects these trucks. With or without a trailer!

  • @matthewswanson8577
    @matthewswanson8577 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Need to retry with a 50 gallon tank cause that may also add more weight to the over all weight and affect the mpg on the truck as well

    • @SMiller5488
      @SMiller5488 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      150lbs of fuel makes ZERO difference...

  • @jcnun3930
    @jcnun3930 4 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    Ford has run the table with the 2020 superduty

  • @rickm0208
    @rickm0208 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sorry if I missed it somewhere, but did all three trucks have the same rear ends? Also, I am thinking the Cummins HO should have better MPGs due to the increased HP and Torq?

  • @Lucasbutnotoil
    @Lucasbutnotoil ปีที่แล้ว

    Man that 3.04 diesel 😅🥲😪😪😪

  • @johndeerefarmer4483
    @johndeerefarmer4483 4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Ford for the win! It's nice to see Ford win in fuel economy for once. The Ford engineers really got it right this time.

  • @Deere-uh4go
    @Deere-uh4go 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    After owning a third gen cummins I said I’d never buy a Chrysler product again. But that is nice.

    • @joegeorgia8989
      @joegeorgia8989 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Haha yeah I agree. I have a '14 3500 ram with the Cummins. The engine is great, but everything else broke. I learned my lesson.

    • @jasonwilliams3223
      @jasonwilliams3223 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I've had zero issues with my 2nd 3rd or 4th gens....

    • @JohnDoe-nz6bk
      @JohnDoe-nz6bk 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Joe Georgia had zero issues with my 2016 Cummins!

    • @lw6735
      @lw6735 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You guys having good success with Ram trucks obviously don’t pull much n have your truck at bone stock power if you have had zero transmission and head gasket issues and haven’t done head studs and built transmission lol or are still at low mileage n drive like a grandpa

    • @lw6735
      @lw6735 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      John Doe If you have a HO Cummins with an Aisin Transmission and bone stock power I’m not surprised if you don’t have issues but add any power and ur toast

  • @joesalazar770
    @joesalazar770 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Well it's a great truck period I have hauled 50k total with my ram 2500. It handled it fine
    No heat issues or other issues I could easily get it up to 80 mph if I wanted I kept it down around 65. With that much weight touch speed will be a handful Incase a blow out or other issues have fun guys. Keep them frames straight

  • @SnowdEnTexas
    @SnowdEnTexas 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Honestly Ford has come along way but we as consumers need to start putting pressure on our favorite brands and on the big three to really push the envelope and provide us with efficient reliable machines especially if we are depending bon them for a business and paying almost the price of a small house for it. Videos like this are great and hopefully the brands use them to improve and also hopefully the competition forces each to improve.

    • @bigjohn5104
      @bigjohn5104 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      I think they should offer a purpose built work truck, each brand. And by that I don't mean the regular trucks just stripped of all the cool tech inside I mean one that has bigger or better key were items ball joints u joints suspension ect while at the same time not having plastic inside so cheap that it doesn't even fit right new, I guess a line of work trucks not cheap trucks if that makes sense.

  • @ORIGINAL__ONE
    @ORIGINAL__ONE 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Should I get a single axle Semi because it's about the same Mpg
    for hauling 5 cars

    • @TFLtruck
      @TFLtruck  4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      You could, but you should consider maintenance cost for each. Maintaining a Class 6 or 7 truck is a different game. We do not have an exact cost analysis for this right now.

    • @Random12231
      @Random12231 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I hauled cars with a 6/7 car Kaufman for a few years. I would say even for a 5 car trailer it is worth getting the class A truck. MPG will be near identical, but you will be MUCH more comfortable in the class A. And this Ram is probably 80 thousand out the door. A VERY well maintained modern class A can be had for 40-50k. And in the long run a class A will be more durable and cheaper to run. They are built to work all day every day under heavy loads. If you read forums for car haulers, people using non commercial trucks are replacing transmissions and differentials as frequently as every 40k miles or less. Whereas a class A is built to run 500K plus miles between major services. And servicing one of these new diesel trucks is honestly not much cheaper than servicing a big class A. Unless you really don't want to deal with the size, the class A is the better choice all around. Hope this helps somewhat. Best of luck whichever way you go 👍

    • @dchawk81
      @dchawk81 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Get a dual axle and haul 8 for more money.

  • @ricwestdoesitwork
    @ricwestdoesitwork 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I'm not surprised to see that the Ram came in 3rd on the mileage as Dodge isn't known for fuel mileage in many of its vehicles. I will say in a HD truck it isn't always about the mileage as how much you can tow or haul.

    • @doddgarger6806
      @doddgarger6806 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Has absolutely nothing to do with Cummins

    • @ricwestdoesitwork
      @ricwestdoesitwork 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@doddgarger6806 I never said it did.

  • @abrahamrivera3291
    @abrahamrivera3291 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Can you guy's test some nolder trucks and see how they compare, like maybe 10 years old.

  • @xhawkeye8717
    @xhawkeye8717 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    The straps aren’t needed since the chains are present. Not sure what the straps are for?

  • @BannedOnMain
    @BannedOnMain 4 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    Can you do a 7.3 gas vs power stroke tow comparison? I’m currently trying to decide between the two

    • @BannedOnMain
      @BannedOnMain 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Biel Mèlich Artés 25,000 GVWR. It’s a toy hauler and I’m thinking about service intervals as well as the tow capacity. Don’t wanna over stress a gas motor towing that pretty much everyday.

    • @Datsun7705
      @Datsun7705 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Joshua Finke get a diesel because the 7.3 gas is rated at 15,000 lbs

    • @armonefoulon4568
      @armonefoulon4568 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Diesel will get 50% better fuel mileage empty or towing than the 7.3 gas.

    • @APGJuggernaut
      @APGJuggernaut 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      In the case of 3/4 tons in general, is it even worth it to buy a diesel? The 7.3 pretty much maxes out most of the trucks capacity. I could see a diesel being worth it if there is a significant mpg difference loaded and unloaded. Otherwise the power is there at least for the 7.3.

    • @APGJuggernaut
      @APGJuggernaut 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Datsun7705 What trim and what rear gear? TFL just smoked the ike gauntlet with a 7.3 towing a 16,000 lb trailer. Made it up the pass at 8 minutes and some change. Way faster than the Gas Chevy.

  • @raccbc27
    @raccbc27 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    It was probably doing a regen which uses more fuel

    • @trevorschield8195
      @trevorschield8195 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      If it was doing a Regen dont you think that it would of used the most DEF fluid out of all three trucks?

    • @mmmmurphy
      @mmmmurphy 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@trevorschield8195 i don't think def usage changes during a regen

    • @trevorschield8195
      @trevorschield8195 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@mmmmurphy so what is Def fluid used for then?

    • @mmmmurphy
      @mmmmurphy 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      ​@@trevorschield8195 reduces N0x. maybe it does consume more because more fuel is being burned during a regen but i don't know if its enough that you would notice. you definitely can tell you use more fuel during a regen.

    • @colinmatlock2164
      @colinmatlock2164 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@trevorschield8195 def fluid itself has nothing to do with the regen. The regen can happen either actively or passively based on conditions. Passively being under the right conditions exhaust gas tempt can get high enough for long enough to burn anything in the dpf with no action required by the computer. Active regens actually dump raw fuel into the system to help heat the dpf up to temp to burn it all off. According to Cummins the 6.7 uses def at a rate of 2-3% of your fuel usage so in only 66 miles you would notice an active regen on your mpg but you'd be talking about a far less noticeable change in def.

  • @efraiin2744
    @efraiin2744 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    So did the other trucks have 5k miles? I feel like sometimes you give excuses for Ram. I watch all your videos on all the channels so I enjoy them all! Keep kicking butt and Andre good luck on the CDL.

  • @T51B1
    @T51B1 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    What blend of diesel was used? #1 gets less mpg compared to #2.

    • @MrTruckTV
      @MrTruckTV 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      It's winter, the pumps in Colorado always blend the two

  • @ModernCountryLiving
    @ModernCountryLiving 4 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    Nice Job Ford! Home run in my book. Love the competition of the big 3 which benefits us all. Can you really go wrong with any of them? Probably not. But man...the Ford is dominating.

    • @kevinhoffpauir1109
      @kevinhoffpauir1109 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Ford hit a Grand Slam with the mpg loop.

    • @tomlarge8841
      @tomlarge8841 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      they had to limit the test to 66 miles because the Ford couldn't go any farther without a mechanic shop😅

    • @ModernCountryLiving
      @ModernCountryLiving ปีที่แล้ว

      @@tomlarge8841 Haters gonna hate!! :)

    • @piglet7943
      @piglet7943 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ModernCountryLiving it’s true. What’s the point of better mpg on a 66 mile route whenever the truck isn’t reliable on long hauls.

    • @ModernCountryLiving
      @ModernCountryLiving ปีที่แล้ว

      @@piglet7943 I am sorry that was your experience. Ford has regularly topped the consumer reports HD truck reliability ratings. Though, to be fair, none of the HD are super stellar compared to a Toyota.
      I'd buy any of the HD trucks. To say one is worse than the other needs to be based on real data...not a single point data....but tens of thousands of instances of reliability data. I'd put lots of miles of Ford super duty trucks and so has my dad. He has also owned Ram and GM within his construction firm and he's buying Ford vs them based on what he likes and his reliability experiences.

  • @marcksman1990
    @marcksman1990 4 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    With the new diesels there may be some mpg difference depending on Current soot level and Regen

    • @joerapo
      @joerapo 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Good point. Maybe a tuner that has forced regen mode should be used prior to the tests.

    • @THEjasonTDI
      @THEjasonTDI 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Yep. And a regen on the IKE could have caused the RAM to drop off like it did in that test. I've had my older Cummins go into a regen up that grade and it definitely slowed the truck.

    • @marcksman1990
      @marcksman1990 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yea a forced Regen would be nice , it would also be interesting to see what truck has a higher soot level after the test

    • @AkioWasRight
      @AkioWasRight 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@THEjasonTDI With your accelerator to the floor, the truck won't regenerate.

    • @AkioWasRight
      @AkioWasRight 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@joerapo The best thing to do is just drive it for a much longer distant and include your regen process. Regen is a part of how your engine operates, it's not something you should ignore.

  • @JohnSmith-ev1sm
    @JohnSmith-ev1sm 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Guys, you CANNOT use the vin web page. It does not account for the specific features on your truck, despite using your vin. This is the case with the 1500's anyway, you have to double check payload etc on your door jamb.

  • @larsgibsonsmelker1365
    @larsgibsonsmelker1365 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Now do a repair section for when you have to remove/lift the cab of the Ford for anything.

  • @toofastnobrakes
    @toofastnobrakes 4 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    Hopefully this will be incentive for ram to go with Allison to replace the aisin. Ide love to have that 9 speed behind a Cummins 😍

    • @Gantzz321
      @Gantzz321 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      If Ram pulls the trigger and goes to the Allison I think they own the market place

    • @knightwing4
      @knightwing4 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Mike Hunt - or maybe even an actual Allison 10 speed or a ZF 10 speed. Or how about going like a big truck with a 12 or 13 speed. What ever they do I think they need a transmission with a wide enough spread to be able to have a 3.42 rear end. I thing the 3.73 is a big part of what’s hurting their mpg’s. Straight 6’s really do seem to work better at lower rpm’s.

    • @toofastnobrakes
      @toofastnobrakes 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      knightwing4 I honestly think 3.73 is the sweet spot for towing and mpg. Even with more gears. Semis typically run 3.73 or 3.55 at the least even with 18 Speeds. And it would be nice to get the Allison, I see them using there 9 speed since that is what Allison is pushing right now. And if they get a ZF “which is likely” will probably be an 8speed. They already run ZF 8speeds in the 1500 and now the 2500/3500 with the 6.4 hemi. As well as ZF has been testing the new 8speed they developed on a 2015 ram 3500. But we will see 🤷‍♂️

    • @Smooththatsme
      @Smooththatsme 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      knightwing4 I believe Ram has dropped the 3.42 in the 2500 trucks. It’s 3.73 with the option to get 4.10 now

    • @lw6735
      @lw6735 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      knightwing4 used to but not anymore Ford has 1050 ft lb at 1600 whereas Ram High Output only has 880 ft lb at 1600 and 1000 at 1800

  • @NickySull
    @NickySull 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Tighten down that boom chain

    • @robertwillams2225
      @robertwillams2225 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Job search

    • @MrTruckTV
      @MrTruckTV 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      We did several times, it kept driving the hoe into the wood floor

  • @akilghosh
    @akilghosh 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Why no duallys go up cliffhanger 2.0 ?

  • @nrk2of3
    @nrk2of3 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Do a video on how easy each truck is to de-DEF. That's what i want to know. It should be a setting from the menu with a strongly worded warning don't do this unless it zombie are coming or you want better fuel economy. You know like track mode.

  • @Codemanstheman
    @Codemanstheman 4 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    If you were towing 30k for 100,000 miles, the difference between the f350 and the ram is over $11,000 in fuel savings. That’s significant

    • @R.E.L.Asphalt_Sealcoating
      @R.E.L.Asphalt_Sealcoating 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Yep if you only drove the Ram on windy days, and the Ford on calm days.

    • @Gantzz321
      @Gantzz321 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@sonsofliberty3081 that is what he said

  • @Raffles-ng9fs
    @Raffles-ng9fs 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Why do the new HD Rams hood look like its not closed all the way?

    • @dannystrong8127
      @dannystrong8127 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      I would be scared to buy a Ram. Puegot, Fiat, Chrysler does not give me any confidence that they will be getting better.

    • @GroovesAndLands
      @GroovesAndLands 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@dannystrong8127 I worked 5 years for FCA. Despite sizable employee discount - I never bought one...

    • @scottdbsn
      @scottdbsn 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Raffles 2108
      They are saving you a step when look under the hood for those missing ponies!

    • @harleyjackson5513
      @harleyjackson5513 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Exactly why I drive a Ford Superduty!

    • @TheXOoftheRO
      @TheXOoftheRO 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@GroovesAndLands you dont use a truck for work either. Rams are the backbone of real world job sites for a reason.

  • @kennethstrickland477
    @kennethstrickland477 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wish mine had the bigger tank it needs it around 250 or 300 miles you have to get fuel

  • @MrTimbo1997
    @MrTimbo1997 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    That dash blinking would drive me nuts. How turn that off

  • @TyeWills
    @TyeWills 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    My f150 has a bigger fuel tank.

    • @bigjohn5104
      @bigjohn5104 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Haha agreed my sploder and wife's merc mountaineer don't have a much smaller tank lol

  • @robertbaratheon9289
    @robertbaratheon9289 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    If you're rolling on the highway a ten speed won't make any bit of difference over a six. It's all down to axle and overdrive ratios. If you are driving in stop and go then a ten speed would have the advantage, but on the highway, no. A four speed with the same overdrive as a six speed would return damn near the same mpg on a highway run provided you are running on relatively flat ground.

  • @cjj7264
    @cjj7264 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Roman, has tfl been offered to be purchased by a car manufacturer?

  • @chuyjr8
    @chuyjr8 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Love your videos buying a ram

    • @dingleberryxo7623
      @dingleberryxo7623 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Uuh,Ram had the worst fuel mileage.what's there to love?

  • @wd8786
    @wd8786 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Towing at night or when it gets cooler the air is denser you’ll get more oxygen more power, so towing the Ford late gave it a slight advantage?

    • @mattg8116
      @mattg8116 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I don't like inconsistency in testing but if I had to guess I'd say the morning air is cooler than the evening/dusk

    • @AK_Ray
      @AK_Ray 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Cooler air is denser needing MORE fuel for the higher volume of oxygen per given unit in order to maintain a computer controlled fuel mixture.

    • @guyod1
      @guyod1 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Not 1.8 mpg difference

    • @wd8786
      @wd8786 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@AK_Ray Yes, but he is towing heavy, so more power is what he needs. A smaller engine will work harder and get lower gas mileage because it has to work harder. I've seen it and done it. I got much better gas mileage towing with my 8.1 than my 5.3 towing the same trailer. And better in cooler temps than hotter. That's a fact. But I don't know what the conditions were when they towed. I would trust the test more if they did it on the same day and same time of day. But that isn't always possible. Also, another test they did with all three half tons without a trailer, one truck lead the pack most of the time and drafting surely played a role in those results also.

    • @hihaveaniceday9386
      @hihaveaniceday9386 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Jesus christ yall nitpick everything

  • @victorhobson5078
    @victorhobson5078 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    The only thing I don’t like about this test is that it’s on winter diesel. Anyone who has driven semi in the winter, you always lose mpg in the winter

    • @MegaGeorge1948
      @MegaGeorge1948 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Up in Canada the Diesel fuel is #1 to run at very cold temperatures of - 50 C. But that fuel has less BTU per gallon than #2 Diesel. American Diesel runs #2 all year around with 5% - 20% Bio-fuel (plant based) mix that gels like crazy at that same temperature without adding Power Service anti-gel to it.

  • @marthalopez7098
    @marthalopez7098 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    How mpg would get if running with the dame weight at 50-55 mph?

  • @AleksandrZhogan
    @AleksandrZhogan 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    4.10 gears is what killed the mpg. Do the same test of all three trucks at 60 mpg and now Ram with 4.10 will eat Ford and Chevy for breakfast! 😎💪💨💨💨💨