The Opal Experiment That Debunks Millions of Years

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 29 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 298

  • @TickedOffPriest
    @TickedOffPriest 8 วันที่ผ่านมา +61

    The stones cry out to The Glory of God!

  • @manuelteixeira2496
    @manuelteixeira2496 8 วันที่ผ่านมา +23

    He discovered that opal gems do not form in cracks inside silica rock formations, but when silica mixes with certain organic compounds, opal gems form by replacing the previously existent sand.

    • @charlesdeliberis239
      @charlesdeliberis239 7 วันที่ผ่านมา

      You have to be lucky to find them I use to have a rock collection from my grandparents

    • @standingbear998
      @standingbear998 7 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      they are colonizers. lol

  • @toosiyabrandt8676
    @toosiyabrandt8676 8 วันที่ผ่านมา +15

    Hi
    The rapid formation time for opals proved by the jar experiments and later at Lightning Ridge dispel the millions of years hypothesis needed for opal formation, and could include opals formed during Noah’s Flood, but the takeaway from the ‘Rapid Formation’ proof is that opals are being formed as we speak!😮

  • @inthelightofhisglory9614
    @inthelightofhisglory9614 8 วันที่ผ่านมา +28

    For a long time, the prevalent thinking was that normal weathering formed opal. That is, rainfall, groundwater, and chemistry over hundreds of thousands of years. However, research has demonstrated that opals form much, much faster. There are multiple lines of evidence not only that they formed quickly, but also that they formed during Noah’s Flood..... CMI from the article "Fiery opals from the Flood"

    • @anttisalminen1110
      @anttisalminen1110 5 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@inthelightofhisglory9614 what did God try to cover, or comfort after the flood, by generating these gems for remaining people to find???

    • @inthelightofhisglory9614
      @inthelightofhisglory9614 4 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      @anttisalminen1110 what gems are being uncovered? God has nothing to hide. The problem is that you will listen to man before God. Or only man and not listen to God at all.

  • @tentamalaska
    @tentamalaska 9 วันที่ผ่านมา +37

    And the rainbow appeared after the flood declaring God's promise to never destroy the world with water again.
    Opals are like rainbows in color.
    And often called the rainbow gem!

    • @BmoreGrrrrl
      @BmoreGrrrrl 9 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      Rainbows form from light being refracted through water droplets in the air. Why did the laws of physics producing this effect not work for the 1600 years before the supposed Noah's Flood?

    • @sabhishek9289
      @sabhishek9289 9 วันที่ผ่านมา +5

      ​​@@BmoreGrrrrl I don't really know. However, it could be because God changed the way light behaves after the flood so that it can form rainbows. Or it could have something to do with the fact that God didn't make the water cycle work the same way before the flood.

    • @georg7120
      @georg7120 9 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Sounds like a threat to me.

    • @intentionally-blank
      @intentionally-blank 9 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@BmoreGrrrrl Who's to say it wouldn't have? In the account it also states that it hadn't yet rained and the water would rise up in a mist to water the garden.
      These are the generations of the heavens and of the earth when they were created, in the day that the LORD God made the earth and the heavens, And every plant of the field before it was in the earth, and every herb of the field before it grew: for the LORD God had not caused it to rain upon the earth, and there was not a man to till the ground. But there went up a mist from the earth, and watered the whole face of the ground. - Genesis 2:4-6

    • @intentionally-blank
      @intentionally-blank 9 วันที่ผ่านมา +5

      @@georg7120 It's smart to not ignore warnings and to consider them seriously. What will happen to you when you exit this realm?

  • @inthelightofhisglory9614
    @inthelightofhisglory9614 8 วันที่ผ่านมา +14

    The naysayers worship man over God. This is truly sad to see.

  • @newcreationinchrist1423
    @newcreationinchrist1423 8 วันที่ผ่านมา +32

    Praise God 🙌🙌🙌 God's word being proven every day! Appreciate you CMI and you are in my prayers

    • @iam7712
      @iam7712 8 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      Wrong, The furtherest galaxies we can currently see are 14,000,000,000 light years away. That means the light took 14,000,000,000 years to get here. That means the universe is 14,000,000,000 years old. You have been debunked.

    • @donchristie420
      @donchristie420 8 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      @@newcreationinchrist1423 he doesn’t need your prayers-maybe a child with cancer,no,never mind,send the child some money

    • @anttisalminen1110
      @anttisalminen1110 5 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@newcreationinchrist1423 not proven, only written in one book, is the impossible story

  • @inthelightofhisglory9614
    @inthelightofhisglory9614 8 วันที่ผ่านมา +19

    For those who doubt God and are stubborn, no explanation will be good enough for them. Humanity is in rebellion against God and until Christ returns, this world will only become more and more evil.
    That means that we as Christians should shine the light brighter and brighter.

    • @solasauto
      @solasauto 8 วันที่ผ่านมา

      I don't get that. I'm not religious and I'm a better person than most christians.

    • @colinmeehan791
      @colinmeehan791 7 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@solasauto SO

    • @StephenPickells-bi2ii
      @StephenPickells-bi2ii 7 วันที่ผ่านมา

      I think everybody should shine the light brighter, but for those who refuse to consider a scientific explanation for reality, then no reasonable explanation will be good enough for them. So they continue to warn other people about their sins

    • @armbarfan
      @armbarfan 23 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา +2

      @@solasauto Not one person is good, only God alone.

  • @newcreationinchrist1423
    @newcreationinchrist1423 8 วันที่ผ่านมา +13

    God bless you CMI 🙏🙏🙏✝️

  • @poliincredible770
    @poliincredible770 8 วันที่ผ่านมา +58

    Biblical timelines are accurate historical descriptions. Asserting billions of years is mythology.

    • @georg7120
      @georg7120 8 วันที่ผ่านมา +5

      Biblical timelines are just mythology.

    • @poliincredible770
      @poliincredible770 8 วันที่ผ่านมา +5

      @@georg7120 you said Biblical timelines are just mythology???
      Our entire method of dating is based on events recorded in the Bible. Please accept accurate historical descriptions; accept Christ.

    • @georg7120
      @georg7120 8 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      @poliincredible770 Just a few datings from a small area and a short period are based on events reported in the bible.

    • @poliincredible770
      @poliincredible770 8 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

      @@georg7120 the designations BC and AD (BCE and CE) are based on events documented in scripture. Therefore EVERY reliable date in existence is based on the Bible. Please accept accurate historical descriptions; please accept Christ.

    • @BmoreGrrrrl
      @BmoreGrrrrl 8 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      @ *Our entire method of dating is based on events recorded in the Bible.* That's why it is not scientific and not accepted by anyone except a narrow group of Fundy creationists.

  • @Toadzx
    @Toadzx 9 วันที่ผ่านมา +5

    Could have used some pictures of opals or opal formation during the explanation, because watching this made me realize that I have no idea what an opal actually is. The only picture in my head is a black pearl.

    • @intentionally-blank
      @intentionally-blank 9 วันที่ผ่านมา

      You mean like the Pirate Ship? Arrrr ...

    • @scottcaley6555
      @scottcaley6555 8 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@Toadzx I agree. For your own mental image, search for “lightning ridge opal”. Be prepared to be blown away!

  • @Vernon-Chitlen
    @Vernon-Chitlen 9 วันที่ผ่านมา +42

    I'd like to see atheists demonstrate a protein or gene forming in a warm little pond prebioticly. Or gravity isn't related to mass.

    • @hectorhernandez215
      @hectorhernandez215 9 วันที่ผ่านมา +6

      They can... Using Imagination...😎

    • @BmoreGrrrrl
      @BmoreGrrrrl 9 วันที่ผ่านมา +12

      I'd like to see creationists demonstrate a supernatural entity using magic to form a protein or gene.

    • @williamgreenfield9991
      @williamgreenfield9991 9 วันที่ผ่านมา +5

      Atheists aren't all scientists, so this is a silly challenge. Just because we don't know (yet) how life began on Earth doesn't mean that "God did it". The Earth is about 4.5 billion years old whether you like it or not. Single cell life began about 3.5 billion years ago and for about 80% of that time there was nothing but single celled life on Earth. Then things started to change when enough oxygen was available. Eventually we evolved, and here we are to figure it all out.

    • @williamgreenfield9991
      @williamgreenfield9991 9 วันที่ผ่านมา +6

      @@hectorhernandez215 You mean the same way theists use their imaginations to invent gods?

    • @jimmiewomble416
      @jimmiewomble416 9 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      Miller and Urey. Watson and Crick. Google is your friend.

  • @soldtobediers
    @soldtobediers 8 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    '' Why The Creator Came First''
    He came 1st.His rooster came 2nd. His hen came 3rd.
    For: she had to be laid before all 3 entity's eggs ever could.

  • @avafury4584
    @avafury4584 8 วันที่ผ่านมา +13

    Without God none of us would even be alive. Thoughts to ponder

    • @panoslymperidis6748
      @panoslymperidis6748 7 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      Gods/Goddesses*

    • @avafury4584
      @avafury4584 7 วันที่ผ่านมา +3

      @panoslymperidis6748 only one God and there is only one way to that God- Jesus

    • @panoslymperidis6748
      @panoslymperidis6748 7 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      @@avafury4584 tell that to every non-christian

    • @I_renounce_satan
      @I_renounce_satan 6 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@panoslymperidis6748 ?

    • @panoslymperidis6748
      @panoslymperidis6748 6 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@I_renounce_satan !

  • @jasonkennedy1670
    @jasonkennedy1670 6 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

    Diamonds can be made in a laboratory/ factory 💎

    • @BmoreGrrrrl
      @BmoreGrrrrl 6 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Humans can make fire in a lab too. Do you think that shows all forest fires started by lightning strikes are intelligently created? 🤪

  • @MarcelinhoTheRock
    @MarcelinhoTheRock 8 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Opal in one week. Yeah, the Flood is here.

  • @normanappleton3627
    @normanappleton3627 4 วันที่ผ่านมา

    G/day Tasman Great to hear you again

  • @arifsoetanto7533
    @arifsoetanto7533 7 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    So, where are the beaches? I want to mine those opals

  • @j_lo8916
    @j_lo8916 22 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา

    So where are these Opals? Show the experiment.

  • @trustenbaker8766
    @trustenbaker8766 วันที่ผ่านมา

    "Even if someone one rose from the dead, the still wouldn't believe"

  • @Dulc3B00kbyBrant0n
    @Dulc3B00kbyBrant0n 9 วันที่ผ่านมา +15

    love it

  • @meathead2676
    @meathead2676 3 วันที่ผ่านมา +3

    I didn't know Jay Leno become a philosopher of science and history 😅

  • @ji8044
    @ji8044 16 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา

    No such experiment ever took place. That's why he doesn't give the name, place and time.

  • @bmsbiblestudies2088
    @bmsbiblestudies2088 วันที่ผ่านมา

    This is great irrefutable evidence for a young earth and the fact that there was indeed a flood.

  • @wms72
    @wms72 7 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Thanks for showing me I may own a jewel formed during the Great Flood. ❤

  • @staben22
    @staben22 3 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Great video!

  • @DavidDrew-n6z
    @DavidDrew-n6z 7 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    So, is anyone manufacturing opals?? And why not?

    • @lessonman_3961
      @lessonman_3961 6 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@DavidDrew-n6z same reason gold isn't manufactured. The cost to create it exceeds the value.

    • @morefiction3264
      @morefiction3264 4 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Yes, there are manufactured opals. IDK if it's the same process described here. It's real opal but the matrix, being constructed doesn't look quite the same as the natural opals.

    • @morefiction3264
      @morefiction3264 4 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      @lessonman_3961 Gold cannot be manufactured because it's an element.

    • @lessonman_3961
      @lessonman_3961 14 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา

      @@morefiction3264 you should brush up on your physics.

    • @lessonman_3961
      @lessonman_3961 14 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา

      @@morefiction3264 cern claim: You can certainly produce gold and there are experiments that do - but you have to realise that the amount being produced is very, very small. Typically you’ll produce a beam that might have a million, or maybe a billion atoms of gold per second. But the number of atoms in a gram of gold is something like one to the power of twenty-three. So if you divide those two numbers you’ll find the amount of gold you’re producing is tiny, tiny fractions. Approximately 0.0000000000000001g.

  • @lethalschannel2759
    @lethalschannel2759 7 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Crayfish are not made of sand.... I've seen opalised crayfish and molluscs. I've also seen opal in petrified wood. That fits if it requires silica, petrified wood is high silica

  • @joanneg7646
    @joanneg7646 6 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Diamonds too.. they don't take millions of years.. ppl are soo gullable.

  • @ragnapodewski4694
    @ragnapodewski4694 7 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Sorry, Opal is growing in silica rich waters to this day.

  • @reubentompkins8041
    @reubentompkins8041 8 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

    Watch the programs ,Is Genesis History!

  • @theGuideMarkII
    @theGuideMarkII 7 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Congrats! You’ve grown your own opal with a kit from Amazon-bravo! Now for the next challenge: make an entire human in one day (yay!). It’s a bit tricky, but don’t worry, you’ll be so proud when you’re done. Let’s get started!
    Step 1: Gather all the rare ingredients. Don’t spill anything-you’ll need everything. A lab would be handy, but hey, maybe a big kitchen table will do.
    Step 2: Assemble your first cell. We’ll start with the DNA strand. Grab some really good pliers, a high-powered microscope (maybe borrow an electron one from NASA), and carefully put together the first base pair. Don’t drop it! Now do the next one... and the next... but make sure you pick the right letters-errors will ruin everything. Only 3 billion more to go for one cell. Done? Take a well-deserved break-you’ve got 33 trillion cells left!
    Step 3: Don’t forget mitochondrial DNA! You’ll need 16,000 base pairs per cell. Times 33 trillion cells. Fun fact: when you’re done, you’ll have woven enough DNA to stretch from Earth to the Sun 64 times. Better not mess up a single sequence, though, or... well, back to the drawing board!
    Step 4: Start building the cells themselves-good luck coordinating 37.2 trillion of them into a single functioning human. Having trouble? Oh, come on-God did it in one day without a kit! You should be fine. Just keep going, soldier.
    Now, jokes aside, let’s get real. Growing opals in a lab in a few weeks doesn’t “prove” God created the universe in a week or humans in a day. Who are you kidding? Opals are fascinating and complex, but they’re nowhere near as intricate as the systems that make up life, let alone an entire cosmos. This kind of argument might sound impressive on the surface, but it’s just another leap of logic that falls apart under scrutiny.

    • @mike300rum
      @mike300rum 7 วันที่ผ่านมา +3

      You literally just explained why special creation by God is the best explaination for life.

    • @theGuideMarkII
      @theGuideMarkII 7 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@mike300rum @mike300rum: did you actually read my reaction? You seriously think a human being of over 33 trillion unique cells, with DNA spanning the distance of the earth to the sun 64 times - not to mention the even bigger number of bacteria in your body- is actually made from a figurine of clay where some deity puffed breath in? Especially since we're not made of silicon but of carbon.. Go on, keep believing in Fairy Tales, apparently you're inclined to do so.

  • @kjata77
    @kjata77 4 วันที่ผ่านมา

    He was doing a great job until @06:40 ...using "global". The Earth is not, never has been, never will be a globular system or object.

  • @soldtobediers
    @soldtobediers 8 วันที่ผ่านมา

    ''When the solution is simple God is answering.'' A.E. not A.I.

  • @standingbear998
    @standingbear998 7 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    mt st helens proved the rocks can for in a short time. the human body can make stones in a short time, pearls are made in a few years. and so on. coal and othere things formation stories are a crock.

    • @theGuideMarkII
      @theGuideMarkII 6 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Mt. St. Helens showed that rocks can form quickly under the right conditions. Sure, the human body can produce stones (kidney or gallstones) rapidly, pearls take a few years, and coal has its own unique formation process. But none of these examples prove what you’re implying-that the Earth is young or that complex systems like the human body can be created in an instant.
      Now here’s a challenge for you: prove that a human body of 33 trillion cells, each containing DNA with a combined length of 64 times the distance from Earth to the sun, can be made from a figurine of clay with just a puff of breath-in one single day.
      This reminds me of something I’ve observed:
      "When I went outside in nature and looked at the amazing world-the sun, moon, stars, and all its beauty-I started to believe in a god who must have made it all. But when I started studying nature, digging, exploring, probing, gazing through microscopes and telescopes, I rejected the idea and lost my faith. The universe is far too vast, too old, and life far too complex to be made by anyone, however intelligent, powerful, or long-lived they might be."

  • @toothnail605
    @toothnail605 8 วันที่ผ่านมา +3

    Imagine having such an over the top faith and belief that a meth lab blew up or 36 sticks of dynamite and HERE WE ARE! Big ah Bang!!

    • @Mark-h2s
      @Mark-h2s 6 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Wow, okay.
      The Big Bang is just an unfortunate nickname that was slapped onto the cosmological model. The Big Bang was not big, and did not make a 'bang' sound. It's simply refers to the initial expansion of the observable universe, an expansion scientists can measure today, along with the cosmic microwave background and other evidence.
      All relevant observable evidence, mathematics, and physics, demonstrate that the Universe once existed in a hot, dense state, then expanded.
      That's what the evidence demonstrates, so that's what scientists must go with. There are problems with the big bang model, as there are with many scientific models, but it is the model with the most supporting evidence so far.
      Back in the day, when the model was first proposed by a Christian physicist, a lot of atheists were opposed to it because it implies the universe had a beginning, rather than existing eternally.
      There you go:-). The Big Bang cosmological model is not your enemy, many Christians are really into it, and who knows, maybe a god caused the Big Bang.

  • @themeek351
    @themeek351 7 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

    It would annoy me every time when the Discovery channel would cram a "millions of years to make opals" false statement in every scene of their "Outback Opals" show! Totally trying hard to brainwash their audience! I don't agree with the tactic!

    • @stevelever83
      @stevelever83 3 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Have you seen how the opals are found in seams, rather than in sand?

  • @dallasburnworth
    @dallasburnworth 8 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Interesting information, but completely annoying that the professor's or his daughter's name are not mentioned. Also annoying that their collective work is not linked or cited by name. Is buying "Creation Magazine" a requirement for knowing something that could have just been mentioned by name on a video?

    • @stevelever83
      @stevelever83 3 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      Welcome to God bothering 101. Pay us, and we'll pray for you, God will heal you, and if you are naughty, you will be forgiven.
      The whole God thing is a scam to seperate idiots from their money

  • @polibm6510
    @polibm6510 5 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Did I found a comedy channel?

  • @BmoreGrrrrl
    @BmoreGrrrrl 8 วันที่ผ่านมา +8

    If anyone wants to know the real science, here is a good description from Opal Galaxy
    *Australian Opal*
    Australian Opal forms through a chemical reaction involving silicon dioxide and water. As water runs down through the Earth, it picks up silica from sandstone and carries this silica-rich solution into cracks and voids caused by natural faults or decomposing fossils. As the water evaporates, it leaves behind a silica deposit. These deposits have formed a shiny rock appearance with different colors and patterns that people refer to as Opals. They are found in ironstone rocks, sandstone rocks, and sometimes in fossils of pre-historic animals such as dinosaurs, bugs, wood (tree roots, etc.), and even in shells. It takes about 5 to 6 million years to make a 1 cm opal to mature. Opals were formed in Australia from a giant inland lake that once covered what is now the Australian desert.
    *Hydrophane Opals*
    Many opals mined in Ethiopia, especially from the Welo deposits, are hydrophane. The term “Hydrophane” describes a porous opal with the ability to absorb water. A change in color or transparency often accompanies the water absorption. This reaction occurs due to volcanic rock deposits and lava within the volcanic region of Ethiopia, differing significantly from the formation process of Australian Opals

    • @anaquaduck5252
      @anaquaduck5252 8 วันที่ผ่านมา

      And yet one man was able to create opals via a rapid process.

    • @BmoreGrrrrl
      @BmoreGrrrrl 8 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

      @@anaquaduck5252 So? Why would anyone be slow enough to think that means all opals were created that way?

    • @mmaimmortals
      @mmaimmortals 8 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      @@BmoreGrrrrl
      "It takes about 5 to 6 million years to make a 1cm opal to mature."
      That isn't science, it's mythology.
      There is no way to experimentally demonstrate that is how much time it actually takes.
      That mythology defies natural laws of physics.
      5 to 6 million years would (at a minimum) completely vanquish coast lines with erosion.

    • @anaquaduck5252
      @anaquaduck5252 7 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@BmoreGrrrrl " It takes about 5 to 6 million years to make a 1 cm opal to mature" is not so simple or just so, all of a sudden. Just like diamonds and so on.

  • @Pay-It_Forward
    @Pay-It_Forward 8 วันที่ผ่านมา +3

    *Even if you could synthetically manufacture opals quickly, doesn't prove they happened quickly in Nature. And even is they happened quickly in nature, it doesn't prove a worldwide flood did it. 95% percent of Opal is in very small isolated areas of 4 countries, Australia, Ethiopia, Brazil and Mexico. If a flood did it they would be prolific. And Opal being able to happen quickly doesn't disprove radiometric dating!*

  • @pekde
    @pekde 7 วันที่ผ่านมา

    We need to remember that of course it would be possible to God to create opals and diamonds and coal without process. Just like human is created from scratch. From sand...

    • @theGuideMarkII
      @theGuideMarkII 6 วันที่ผ่านมา

      What you need to do is question this nonsense, these fairy tales (and one day you will...). A human body of 33 trillion cells, each containing DNA with a combined length of 64 times the distance from Earth to the sun, can be made from a figurine of clay with just a puff of breath-in one single day. Yeah right.
      "When I went outside in nature and looked at the amazing world-the sun, moon, stars, and all its beauty-I started to believe in a god who must have made it all. But when I started studying nature, digging, exploring, probing, gazing through microscopes and telescopes, I rejected the idea and lost my faith. The universe is far too vast, too old, and life far too complex to be made by anyone, however intelligent, powerful, or long-lived they might be."

    • @pekde
      @pekde 4 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @theGuideMarkII so you think randomness and coincidence is a better solution?

    • @theGuideMarkII
      @theGuideMarkII 4 วันที่ผ่านมา

      I'm not entirely sure what your question implies or the motivation behind it, but the idea of choosing belief isn't something I find feasible. Belief, after all, isn’t a matter of choice-it's the result of evidence, reasoning, and personal conviction.
      Having been a Christian for most of my life, I came to the conclusion that not only does God not exist, but logically, He cannot exist. This realization allowed me to reassess the Bible more objectively, and I can now say with conviction: even if the God of the Bible were real, I would never serve such a being. The character depicted in its pages doesn't align with any conception of justice, love, or morality I could respect-even if rejecting Him would mean eternal consequences.

    • @pekde
      @pekde 4 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @theGuideMarkII or then you understand only later. Best of luck!

    • @theGuideMarkII
      @theGuideMarkII 4 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@pekde same to you! And remember, if you (think you) need a god in your life to cope with life and life's challenges, so be it. As long as it is your choice and your choice alone, and not based on false information and false assumptions. My only advise: read the Bible really, really well. Or better yet, don't, if you want to stay in the faith. When I started doing that I lost my faith, since what I was reading was not what I was taught.

  • @Bluets023
    @Bluets023 7 วันที่ผ่านมา

    I just want to know when Jesus was born .

  • @georg7120
    @georg7120 9 วันที่ผ่านมา +3

    Where is this published?

  • @loboxx337
    @loboxx337 8 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

    Oh look there is water on the earth brought by an asteroid billions of years ago I know I was there.

    • @I_renounce_satan
      @I_renounce_satan 6 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Absolutely love this! "...I know I was there". 🤣🤣🤣

  • @blank-964
    @blank-964 8 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

    👍

  • @georg7120
    @georg7120 8 วันที่ผ่านมา +3

    Prove that there was a flood, prove that it was "Noah's flood", or stop spreading this nonsense.

    • @intentionally-blank
      @intentionally-blank 8 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Really very few deny there was a flood. It's usually claimed that it wasn't global and catastrophic and certainly that it wasn't at the 'hand' of God. What kind of proof would you require? What is your understanding of the reasons given for the flood from scripture?

    • @BmoreGrrrrl
      @BmoreGrrrrl 8 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@intentionally-blank There have been plenty of local floods all over the planet in the last 500 million years. There is no evidence for a single one-year global flood only 4400 years ago.

    • @georg7120
      @georg7120 7 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @intentionally-blank It is mythology, maybe inspired by a real flood.

    • @intentionally-blank
      @intentionally-blank 7 วันที่ผ่านมา

      ​@@georg7120 Explain the flood accounts from around the world, in various cultures and locations. Mythology spreading?
      What is your understanding of the reasons given for the flood from scripture?

    • @georg7120
      @georg7120 7 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      @@intentionally-blank Maybe there was a flood, so people tried to explain it and made up some mythological stories.

  • @anttisalminen1110
    @anttisalminen1110 8 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    All the believers generate these fairytails, because of their belief in the bible? already noahs ark was an impossibility, so much for that

    • @FatBellyChemist1234
      @FatBellyChemist1234 5 วันที่ผ่านมา

      You shall not tempt the LORD your God, and only Him you shall serve.

  • @FatBellyChemist1234
    @FatBellyChemist1234 5 วันที่ผ่านมา

    No wonder God told me a simplified version of this, the Holy Spirit gave me an impression that He made these. It makes sense why Jesus told the hypocrites that if the disciples wre silent the stones will shout to glorify Him

  • @redant6065
    @redant6065 วันที่ผ่านมา

    💩✔

  • @John3.3
    @John3.3 9 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Not many humans made the epic voyage ? Lets not get too carried away now.

    • @Vernon-Chitlen
      @Vernon-Chitlen 9 วันที่ผ่านมา +4

      You mean: given enough time, the impossible becomes possible, the possible probable and the probable virtually certain? Like non living matter became living 3.7 billion years ago? But the eternal transcendent God is impossible?

    • @intentionally-blank
      @intentionally-blank 8 วันที่ผ่านมา

      How many made it into the ark?

    • @Vernon-Chitlen
      @Vernon-Chitlen 8 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@intentionally-blank 8

    • @intentionally-blank
      @intentionally-blank 8 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@Vernon-Chitlen Are they claiming 3.7 billion now? Seems that number keeps changing. I think this beautiful earth doesn't look a day over 6,058 years old. And I know it's gone through some tough times and groans about it as it ages but it's close to getting a complete makeover. 😇
      But the day of the Lord will come like a thief, and then the heavens will pass away with a roar, and the heavenly bodies will be burned up and dissolved, and the earth and the works that are done on it will be exposed. Since all these things are thus to be dissolved, what sort of people ought you to be in lives of holiness and godliness, waiting for and hastening the coming of the day of God, because of which the heavens will be set on fire and dissolved, and the heavenly bodies will melt as they burn! But according to his promise we are waiting for new heavens and a new earth in which righteousness dwells. - 2 Peter 3:10-13
      Hallelu Yah!

  • @mindfornication4funn
    @mindfornication4funn 7 วันที่ผ่านมา

    The Easter Bunny is from flood also.... !!!
    God, is actually Luci (fer)

    • @I_renounce_satan
      @I_renounce_satan 6 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Nope. Jesus said: "I saw Satan thrown from heaven like lightning" You are gullible.

    • @FatBellyChemist1234
      @FatBellyChemist1234 5 วันที่ผ่านมา

      To the original comment: you shall not tenpt the LORD your God and only Him you shall serve. Get behind Me satan for you are a stumbling block.

  • @BmoreGrrrrl
    @BmoreGrrrrl 9 วันที่ผ่านมา +5

    More brilliant creationist logic. Some bloke managed to create an opal in a lab therefore all naturally occurring opals were created in a giant flood only 4400 years ago. 🤔

    • @Watch470
      @Watch470 9 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      This video only said that opal is possible to be formed within short time or during catastrophic flood. Unlike delusional secular scientist and atheist that believe it need million of years to form opal.

    • @BmoreGrrrrl
      @BmoreGrrrrl 9 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

      @@Watch470 Ok then, show us an example of an opal being formed in a catastrophic flood.

    • @hectorhernandez215
      @hectorhernandez215 9 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Maybe secular science establishment can suggest a Big Dodge theory...outside empiric data...

    • @Vernon-Chitlen
      @Vernon-Chitlen 8 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      @@BmoreGrrrrl Your universe can't even exist without an imaginary 95% dark matter and energy.

    • @BmoreGrrrrl
      @BmoreGrrrrl 8 วันที่ผ่านมา +5

      @@Vernon-Chitlen *You're universe* If you're going to post inane snark at least learn how to spell "your". 😄

  • @JohnNewby-o8d
    @JohnNewby-o8d 8 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

    So a farmer makes opals in a jam jar and this proves the earth is young because .... if the flood caused opals to formed and the whole world was flooded we should not be able to go far without finding them aii over the place

    • @BmoreGrrrrl
      @BmoreGrrrrl 8 วันที่ผ่านมา +3

      Don't spoil the fantasy by bringing in actual science and logic.

    • @intentionally-blank
      @intentionally-blank 8 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      Can you find the likes of the Grand Canyon near you? How about gold? Do you have gold mines near you? Does everyone have just these two features near them?

    • @JohnNewby-o8d
      @JohnNewby-o8d 8 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      @intentionally-blank sorry did not realise that the flood made gold mines as well as opals

  • @Glop1177
    @Glop1177 9 วันที่ผ่านมา +5

    That's nonsense, Opal is a rock that only forms under extreme pressure and the structure of Opal requires thousands of cycles of evaporite to grow.
    It's like this guy doesn't know anything about geology.

    • @intentionally-blank
      @intentionally-blank 8 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      What part of a cataclysmic flood wouldn't present such pressure and conditions for this to have occurred?

    • @Glop1177
      @Glop1177 8 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

      @intentionally-blank were talking about tectonic pressure not water pressure for one. Like 500-1000 times as much pressure as at the bottom of the ocean.
      Also Opal forms when silicate evaporite collects in tiny layers. To form an Opal it takes thousands of cycles of evaporite, not just 1 big cycle.
      I hope that answers your questions in a way that makes sense.

    • @avafury4584
      @avafury4584 8 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      Nonsense is believing there is no God

    • @Glop1177
      @Glop1177 8 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

      @@avafury4584 sure, but that doesn't make this video more true.
      If God really exists he doesn't need people to lie for him. Remember that liars are of the devil.

    • @avafury4584
      @avafury4584 8 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      @Glop1177 your doubt doesn't make it untrue. Nor do your baseless assertions.

  • @galenhaugh3158
    @galenhaugh3158 8 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Noah's flood didn't have time to create opals.

    • @I_renounce_satan
      @I_renounce_satan 6 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Give your reasons. Billions of years where no one can prove it?

  • @BmoreGrrrrl
    @BmoreGrrrrl 8 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

    More creationist "logic": An electric freezer can make ice therefore the North Polar and South Polar icecaps were made by space aliens in a ginormous electric freezer.

    • @intentionally-blank
      @intentionally-blank 8 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Oh hi again. What is this mechanism called?
      False Analogy (also known as Non-Sequitur)
      A false analogy occurs when someone draws an unjustified conclusion by comparing two things that are not similar or relevant.
      The poster is attempting to use a flawed analogy to support their claim, which is a classic example of a non-sequitur. The conclusion does not logically follow from the premise, and the analogy is simply a creative (but incorrect) attempt to justify a fantastical idea.

    • @BmoreGrrrrl
      @BmoreGrrrrl 8 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@intentionally-blank A scientist designed a generator which can produce an electrical discharge in the lab. You think that proves that lightning from rain clouds is Intelligently Designed, right? 😆😆😆

    • @BmoreGrrrrl
      @BmoreGrrrrl 8 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@intentionally-blank LOL! Looks like my analogy showing how silly this latest creationist claim is scored a direct hit on a creationist's ego. 🙂

    • @intentionally-blank
      @intentionally-blank 8 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@BmoreGrrrrl This is another flaw of your thinking that when one offers rebuttal it's "ego". Your analogy is a logical false analogy or Non-Sequitur.
      What's your sense of what will happen to you when you exit this realm? Scripture offers hope. What does science offer you?

    • @BmoreGrrrrl
      @BmoreGrrrrl 7 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@intentionally-blank It's a perfectly fine analogy. You just don't like it because it hits too close to home for you. 🙂

  • @Vinimarshall450
    @Vinimarshall450 8 วันที่ผ่านมา +3

    Nobody told the chinese about the flood or they wouldve started their calender hundreds of years later 😂😂😂

    • @voiceofreason162
      @voiceofreason162 8 วันที่ผ่านมา +4

      Not true. Study the Chinese pictographs. It's loaded with references to it. Literally hundreds of references of the way they are built overlays Genesis. That's from Chinese sources, not western.

    • @BmoreGrrrrl
      @BmoreGrrrrl 8 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

      @@voiceofreason162 The Jiahu culture in China dates back to 7000 BC, over 9000 years ago. They had villages of over 500 people, art, musical instruments, even proto-writing. Mighty cheeky of them to live 3000 years before the earth was even created. 🙂

    • @voiceofreason162
      @voiceofreason162 8 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      @BmoreGrrrrl Studies of original and calibrated radiocarbon ages of the Neolithic site at Jiahu show that Jiahu's ancient rice is of 7,800-8,800 years old, mined in 1960-63 found 45 house foundations, 370 cellars, 9 pottery kilns and thousands of artifacts of bone, pottery, stone and other materials. remains in the Huaihe River valley. The site connects the Neolithic cultures of the middle reaches of the Yellow River and those of the middle and lower reaches of the Huaihe River.
      1. The sites were underwater. That messes with carbon dating.
      2. Whatever protowriting was found hasn't been deciphered yet. The assumption of advancement has been made, but the archaeological work is still ongoing.
      3. The Chinese language STILL records and events that tie to Genesis. And that's provable, demonstrable, and documented.
      A little research wouldn't go amiss.

    • @Vinimarshall450
      @Vinimarshall450 8 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@voiceofreason162 and with research the flood was approx 12000 years ago

    • @BmoreGrrrrl
      @BmoreGrrrrl 8 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@voiceofreason162 *Jiahu's ancient rice is of 7,800-8,800 years old,* Is 7800 - 8800 years ago older or younger than 6000 year ago? 🙂

  • @williamparker1644
    @williamparker1644 8 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    It's mythology based on unknown actors thousands of years ago. And your imaginary friend. This has nothing to do with geology or science.

    • @intentionally-blank
      @intentionally-blank 8 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Perhaps unknown to you. Have you yourself studied scripture?

  • @4pharaoh
    @4pharaoh 9 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    You are preaching (badly) to the converted, a critical mind sees deception.
    With such claims evidence, references and credentials should be provided.
    The only undeniable evidence provided is: this was an advertisement for Creation Magazine.
    Please do better.
    And I’m on your side!

    • @intentionally-blank
      @intentionally-blank 8 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      Where's the deception?

    • @Glop1177
      @Glop1177 8 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @intentionally-blank he's lying about how Opal forms.

    • @intentionally-blank
      @intentionally-blank 8 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      @@Glop1177 Lying is a serious accusation. How is it when an atheist states something that is later revised it's a new calculation or something? Are you able to read a person's mind to know their heart?

    • @Vernon-Chitlen
      @Vernon-Chitlen 8 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@Glop1177 And your Materialist Cosmology is missing 95% of the energy and matter required to explain it's existence? Labeled "dark" and that's valid? If there was anything, how could astronomers "see" through 4,950.9 light years @ 5.88 trillion miles per to identify an exoplanet orbiting KOI -847. Pluto's largest moon was first discovered in 1978 and Pluto "only" averages 3.1 billion miles from earth.

    • @4pharaoh
      @4pharaoh 8 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      @@intentionally-blank if you “want to believe” - you cannot see deception.
      If you do NOT want to believe- you will never recognize truth if it doesn’t suit you.
      If you seek truth - you “Test all things”
      the second and third lines of my original post are saying he provided no evidence to test.
      It may be true, it may not. With no evidence to confirm his claims He certainly failed my test.

  • @BmoreGrrrrl
    @BmoreGrrrrl 8 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Here is more information from a company The Opal Dealer which manufactures synthetic opals
    How Lab Created Opal is Made
    Synthetic opal, also known as lab-created or man-made opal, is created through a controlled process that replicates the natural formation of opal. Our Lab created opal is known for its vivid colors and patterns.
    *While synthetic opal may have a similar appearance to natural opal, it's important to note that there are differences in terms of composition, structure, and value.* Synthetic opals can offer an affordable and environmentally friendly alternative to natural opals.
    Also do not forget to consider that not all synthetic opal is created equally and may have different purposes. For example, our lab opal products are stabilized with polymer making it perfect for ring making and jewelry creations because it is less prone to cracking and crazing unlike natural opal. Polymer is a great stabilizer for this reasoning but it cannot be used in projects that require high levels of heat such as glassblowing.
    Please note the sentence in *bold.*

  • @richardyates7280
    @richardyates7280 9 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Where do the Scriptures state the age of the earth?

    • @intentionally-blank
      @intentionally-blank 8 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

      How would that appear? How would it be updated each year? We know by the genealogies from Adam found in scripture so the duration can be calculated from any date. For example we can know the number of years from Adam to Yeshua=Jesus. I can find you examples.