How Unhealthy Are Your AirPods? | Bluetooth & EMF

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 25 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 2.8K

  • @TheCronedoggy
    @TheCronedoggy 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +9047

    We spend many hours a day bombarded by non ionizing radiation from light bulbs. That's higher energy than radio waves.

    • @Olivia_Dreamrider
      @Olivia_Dreamrider 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1482

      how dare you use logical thinking skills

    • @ayeshasumayya1866
      @ayeshasumayya1866 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +284

      This is exactly what i was thinking.....

    • @michasokoowski6651
      @michasokoowski6651 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      There is an even worse thing... UV radiation from THE SUN.
      Sun is a deadly laser

    • @atomgutan8064
      @atomgutan8064 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +80

      Exactly

    • @iTzTimmmy
      @iTzTimmmy 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +281

      sir, don't make it obvious people will start to panick. lol

  • @UnavoidableGarbage
    @UnavoidableGarbage 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2865

    I work in the tech department at Target. It’s mostly old people who hear these rumors and are deeply concerned about brain, cancer or brain tumors from AirPods. One of them lectured me for a good minute or two. I’m trying to be nice and not condescending and I understand their fears but sometimes misinformation gets out of control a little bit.

    • @ronnie-lynn
      @ronnie-lynn 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +121

      So true! When I got diagnosed with a brain tumor all I heard was my constant use of AirPods gave me the tumor 😂

    • @killertruth186
      @killertruth186 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +46

      It's mainly people are being gullible with the things. Although now you do have a video to prove your point.

    • @KBRoller
      @KBRoller 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      When I worked as a bagger at a supermarket, an older lady came through my line buying a ton of organic produce, and complaining that it was so expensive. "It is," I agreed, "the conventional produce is much cheaper, if you'd like me to go exchange those for you?" "No no," she said. She insisted she *couldn't* buy conventional, because "they have GMOs and I'm allergic to GMOs."
      Now, I had just graduated from uni at that point (hadn't gotten my first full-time job yet), and though my degree is in computer science, I'd switched to that from studying biomedical engineering with a focus on researching gene therapies for cancers. So I know a little bit more than non-sciency people about GMOs, and knew being "allergic to GMOs" isn't really a thing, because GMOs aren't really one thing. So I asked politely, "Oh, I'm sorry to hear that. Which GMOs are you allergic to?" Her response, as you can imagine, was, "All of them! I get very sick if I eat any GMOs!"
      I didn't continue the conversation, because I decided there was no way she'd listen anyway, but... it made me sad. Someone, somewhere had manipulated this poor old lady into spending money she didn't have -- money that likely went straight into the pockets of the organic producers who perpetuate such myths -- by making her afraid that any and all fruits and vegetables that aren't made by them will make her ill. They scared an old woman out of her money with modern-day Frankenstein stories. That should be illegal.
      So I know the feeling of having customers think they know what they're talking about, but really don't, trying to justify their purchasing habits to themselves and to you.

    • @laurahubbard6906
      @laurahubbard6906 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      Stop making ageist assumptions. I'm what you'd probably call old-as are many of my friends-and we don't harbor these fears at all.

    • @tmore7364
      @tmore7364 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@laurahubbard6906Nobody said it applied all old people, stop looking for reasons to be offended

  • @DontBeUpsettiHaveSumSpaghetti
    @DontBeUpsettiHaveSumSpaghetti 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +4511

    “Is Bluetooth actually toxic?”
    *me getting the notification while literally using Bluetooth headphones 💀*

    • @dredayetheridge
      @dredayetheridge 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +26

      Same!

    • @Rub1xStudios
      @Rub1xStudios 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

      Me too!

    • @eziitis8
      @eziitis8 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +34

      That delay between pressing the play button and it actually playing? Definitely toxic.

    • @jacobanthonysimmons
      @jacobanthonysimmons 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Lol I didn't get the Nofication for some reason when I have it turn on. But I just see this video being uploading today just now while I have my phone bluetooth connect to a soundbar and subwoofer and the subwoofer is connect to the soundbar wireless. So I am using two things that dangerous. Lol.

    • @That_cutegirl-g5n
      @That_cutegirl-g5n 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Same

  • @ITSecurityFTW
    @ITSecurityFTW 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +261

    GASP!!! A doctor who stuck to the research without going all the way over to one side or the other and denigrating the other side just clearing stating the pros and cons of each side? Well color me impressed. Well done.

    • @keiweiful
      @keiweiful 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Speak for yourself. If that were true and he were really open to having a more nuanced conversation, he would have given it a "5" rather than 3.5

    • @ClayMastah344
      @ClayMastah344 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Seriously this is what helps teach and convert people

    • @RobertBoston-n4d
      @RobertBoston-n4d หลายเดือนก่อน

      Whatever dude, its one guys opinion. He's a person just like all of us. Stop hyping him.

  • @sky.abstract
    @sky.abstract 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +552

    Please, please do a video about laundry and dishwasher detergents! I've heard so many claims that make it sound like their impact on hormones could be serious due to the fact these are used so often in our daily lives! Would love to know the truth! Thank you for doing this series, it's been awesome 😊

    • @mattyv6605
      @mattyv6605 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +36

      100% it will you’re wearing it on your skin and washing your body. Endocrine disruption is legit concern

    • @Char-Wilkie
      @Char-Wilkie 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      I agree I would love to see a video about this as well

    • @Eel-on_Musk
      @Eel-on_Musk 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

      Esp indirect effect of dishwasher detergent on our gut health..
      Also PFAS in swim suits and period panty products

    • @videovideoyeah
      @videovideoyeah 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      This would be very interesting to look into

    • @prosandcons-fl2cc
      @prosandcons-fl2cc 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

      an episode on endocrine disrupters as a whole would be very useful to me

  • @labrosts2435
    @labrosts2435 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1391

    As an Electronics Engineer with background on RF and a human with common sense I can say that high volume on headphones and lifestyle changes that come usually with cellphone addiction will have a much bigger impact on your health.

    • @antecboy
      @antecboy 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Another embedded systems engineer here. If you can believe that bluetooth power level devices can give you cancer, then you probably believe that microwaving your food makes it radioactive ☢️

    • @FlammableElectronics
      @FlammableElectronics 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

      Fr💯

    • @imperfectimp
      @imperfectimp 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +44

      Not only that, but I'm sure more lives get saved by having a cell phone than people die from having a cell phone.
      It's just risk vs reward.

    • @TorquemadaTwist
      @TorquemadaTwist 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +34

      Yeah, I'm an electrician and I'm in high RF areas regularly so you'd think if this were close to true sparkys would have higher cancer rates. And people working in television and radio. Thinking this through as I write, people living next to a cell tower or radio station should have clusters of cancer diagnosis.

    • @Masterr59
      @Masterr59 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

      This was my first thought - association. Maybe people who use phones more are also more likely to have a sedentary life, or eat an entire bag of Cheetos each night.

  • @Tman001100
    @Tman001100 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1928

    The overuse of devices like cell phones and PCs...particularly for social media, one can argue, is FAR more unhealthy and damaging to our mental/emotional health compared to risks to our physical health.

    • @kathleenking47
      @kathleenking47 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +24

      Also tattoos and energy drinks?
      I rarely use Bluetooth
      I'm 65 and my BP is 120/80

    • @kingpuppet5881
      @kingpuppet5881 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      Well said.

    • @kathleenmoore9534
      @kathleenmoore9534 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      ​@@kathleenking47Jesus is coming back. God is going to judge. Please accept Jesus as your savior.

    • @kathleenmoore9534
      @kathleenmoore9534 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      ​@@kingpuppet5881Jesus is coming back. God is going to judge. Please accept Jesus as your savior.

    • @tychovw
      @tychovw 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@kathleenmoore9534 Jesus already came back.

  • @divjotdebense
    @divjotdebense 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +4675

    me watchin with bluethooth head phones : 👁👄👁

    • @Boki_7
      @Boki_7 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +69

      BRO SAME 😭✋🏻

    • @MarissaFaith_137
      @MarissaFaith_137 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +43

      SAME😭✌️

    • @jingwei1
      @jingwei1 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +77

      did not expect to see "👁️👄👁️" in 2024

    • @ragingdid
      @ragingdid 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      NAUR CUZ SAMMMMMME😂

    • @PIZZAdayisback
      @PIZZAdayisback 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +30

      Ironically, you're actually safer wearing headphones than directly facing your screen

  • @Reason_To_Heal
    @Reason_To_Heal 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +27

    I just love the way Dr. Mike explains the whole truth and tries to be unbiased so you can make your own decision on the matter.

  • @venera13
    @venera13 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    I randomly found your channel some time ago and found your videos entertaining. And I appreciate you touching on topics like this and potentially harmful health trends. Medical misinformation and sensationalism is really bad on social media right now.

  • @valstracuga
    @valstracuga 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +749

    I just had a conversation last week with my mom who kept saying airpods put you at risk of radiation
    not to dunk on my mom but she believes a lot of things with very little research, so thank you for being able to clear things up for me at least

    • @HypocritesExposd
      @HypocritesExposd 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +59

      Show her this video. Please let us know if she says something like “I don’t know if I can trust a doctor” 🤦‍♂️

    • @kallmekaveen6060
      @kallmekaveen6060 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

      ​@@HypocritesExposdI second this suggestion 😂

    • @dollzo
      @dollzo 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +39

      ​@HypocritesExposd those kinds of people will say he's wrong anyway. Once someone is convinced of something it's hard to convince them otherwise

    • @mast3rbang
      @mast3rbang 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      ​@@HypocritesExposd so naive to think a proof from her intellectual rival(her offspring) will convince her.

    • @maryjane4432
      @maryjane4432 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

      Young people listen to dumb tiktoks and believe it and older people listen to Facebook and believe it.

  • @novatwist5816
    @novatwist5816 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +993

    Did he just do a thesis presentation in a TH-cam video. This is extremely high quality

    • @BotDetector-44
      @BotDetector-44 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +66

      I think you have no idea how a thesis looks like lol

    • @Noah-e9k
      @Noah-e9k 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I think so

    • @alveolate
      @alveolate 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +21

      this really only takes at most an hour of research for most doctors who know where to look for the evidence they want.
      i doubt dr mike read thru entire papers and probably just scanned the abstracts of some of the more highly regarded papers, then maybe looked at the "findings" section if it wasn't clear enough.

    • @tonymouannes
      @tonymouannes 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      You seem to watch the crappy channels. Thia format is actually very common on TH-cam in all fields. You just need to know who to watch.

    • @gnarlywagner8171
      @gnarlywagner8171 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      People put dissertation and thesis presentations on youtube all the time goofball

  • @coltonroark
    @coltonroark 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +397

    I said it in the first video. This is a very important series for him to make
    "Doc Mike is the perfect person to make a series like this. He's educated, reputable, and he has good common sense and don't scare monger. He uses facts paird with nuance."

    • @ross-carlson
      @ross-carlson 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

      Sadly read the comments - MANY are totally clueless and would rather believe in bullshit conspiracy theories.

    • @pavlovs-wug
      @pavlovs-wug 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      ​@@ross-carlson I reckon this is a paradox of science-and-related communicators - the more popular they grow, a higher portion of the audience is going to be anti-science and critical thinking and sail through the content on confirmation bias. Leading to high quality, high reach content, with a comment section split between thoughtful discussion and Internet tripe!
      My hope is that little bits of sensible & critical thinking are getting through to a few people - heck at least they're exposing themselves to content they might not agree with, I guess!

    • @alveolate
      @alveolate 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      those who are too far gone will probably believe whatever the conspiracy theorists tell them; this series is for those who are _adjacent_ to the nutjobs, who sometimes get sent these facebook misinfo stuff and are too busy to look up the facts themselves. for them, being subbed to dr mike and getting the debunks in bite-sized chunks sent straight into their notifs might be the way to go.

    • @silverlve70
      @silverlve70 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@ross-carlsonSome people choose being uneducated. It's sad but true.

    • @Hy-BridAbroad
      @Hy-BridAbroad 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Did you just quote yourself in a TH-cam comment?

  • @nicolasbertin8552
    @nicolasbertin8552 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +109

    As a physicist, I have to make an important clarification. Yes, the energy of an electromagnetic wave is proportional to its frequency. But that doesn't mean low frequency waves can't be energetic : you just got to raise the amplitude of the wave. For example, infrared waves are low frequency compared to UVs. Yet an oven is infrared, so is a CO2 laser capable of cutting through wood or metal. Even lower frequency you're gonna have microwaves, which cook your meals... This is why there was regulation put into place for 4G/5G towers, because their energy is quite high despite the low frequency. The low frequency is used because the lower the frequency, the easier it can penetrate things like walls, cars, etc... This is why radiowaves are so good at being transmitted very far and through various objects, and why longer radiowaves such as AM stations will go through a tunnel and you can keep listening to them in your car, but shorter radiowaves such as FM stations won't.
    And at the core of the reason why it's so hard to predict cancers from EM waves : we simply cannot predict how they interact with individual cells. There is simply too much stuff we don't know yet about our own biology. We don't even know why cells produce extracellular vesicles for example. Yet if you tickle cells with EM waves or acoustic waves with sufficient energy, they're gonna produce vesicles...
    All we can do is have good practice with cell phones which have been recommanded for years: do not put them to your ears for a long time, especially for young children. Use speaker phone instead. For headphones and headsets, maybe don't buy bluetooth for children but wired devices, with an audio cable. Adults have a thicker cranium that usually protects them more efficiently from waves. But still, if you're gonna use them for like 10+ hours a day, maybe buy wired not wireless...

    • @pjaypender1009
      @pjaypender1009 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      You will take my Bluetooth earbuds from my cold dead ears. I wear them 24/7 and will not stop.
      Y'all are ridiculous.

    • @a-terrible-fate532
      @a-terrible-fate532 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@pjaypender1009exactly, who uses wired anymore?!

    • @doctor_puff
      @doctor_puff 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Shut up nerd

    • @steelclackers2611
      @steelclackers2611 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      ​@@a-terrible-fate532meee, I'm too lazy to charge 😂
      I have both types depending on what i need to do tho.

    • @a_tad_rad
      @a_tad_rad 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Well put

  • @nathanhodge123
    @nathanhodge123 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +31

    As a graduate researcher in Life Sciences, I love how you go in depth with the studies performed and discuss much of the nuance. When I hear these kinds of claims it's easy for me to want to just say "you're wrong". But these videos help me to understand more fully the claims, why they exist, and the evidence for and against and it also helps me to be better equipped to have an informed discussion with others. I look forward to watching more of these!

  • @vanessab5063
    @vanessab5063 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +90

    If bluetooth in general is potentially dangerous, I'll take it. My medical devices use it and to have better control of my diabetes and not have burn out, it's worth it as the amount of time I have to focus on my bloodsugar and giving insulin is waaaaaaaay less time consuming after nearly 30 years of dealing with it.

    • @bryant475
      @bryant475 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You can reverse your T2D with Whole Food Plant Based Nutrition. Please look into it!

  • @kaspedkk
    @kaspedkk 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +790

    All visible light contains more energy than 3g, 4g and 5g waves. So if your phones wifi is killing you, make sure to also throw away all your light bulbs and block your windows xD.

    • @chillphill13
      @chillphill13 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

      Mole life is for them😆😆😆

    • @jjohansen86
      @jjohansen86 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +32

      You forgot about blackbody radiation, things that are just at room temperature are emitting infrared radiation with 100,000x greater energy per photon than typical cell phone and Bluetooth emission. That includes yourself, including the individual molecules, cells, and organs inside your body. The inside of your skull is emitting electromagnetic radiation that runs into your brain, one part of your brain is emitting electromagnetic radiation that runs into another part of your brain, even the nuclear membrane inside every cell is emitting electromagnetic radiation that runs into your DNA.

    • @kaspedkk
      @kaspedkk 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@jjohansen86 tru

    • @sleeptodreamx
      @sleeptodreamx 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      ​@LordEide electromagnetic radiation in the visible light spectrum can't penetrate your skin though, so isn't reaching your brain, whereas longer wavelengths penetrate more deeply into tissues or pass completely through the body. bluetooth is most definitely safe as it's so low powered, it's the cell phone use over years that i'm more worried about. i try to use speakerphone or bt earbuds when i can so the phone isn't right next to my head much

    • @allenseeallendo5844
      @allenseeallendo5844 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I used to like this guy until this exact video. He’s a moron. He has no idea what he’s sputtering out of his mouth. Zero education in this area and he’s just done so much harm it’s laughable. One of possibly the safest technologies in cell phones he’s a proponent to block. Zero evidence backing up it’s dangerous. He claims he’s anti this exact thing in the medical field. Lmfao

  • @RagnarokLoW
    @RagnarokLoW 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +79

    Btw even wires emit emf. It's just narrower because of the shielding around it

    • @thesinghzingkid
      @thesinghzingkid 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      the shielding around the wires is to stop that emf from interfering with other cables. Especially if the cables are transmitting data

    • @kathleenking47
      @kathleenking47 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      We've had wires since 📻 radio
      I think, energy drinks and tattoos may be more dangerous

    • @aspecreviews
      @aspecreviews 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I bought a 2002 Prius in 2020, and one day I started it up while my grandpa was on a phone call nearby. The moment I turned the key, the engine spooled up and the call dropped simultaneously.

    • @I.no.ah.guy57
      @I.no.ah.guy57 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@aspecreviews that may be because it's a hybrid. So it has a dynamo or alternator specifically for generating electricity to charge the battery. It's bigger than your normal alternator so it will put out more EMF. I'm a mechanic but I don't really work on hybrids much, so I may be wrong. But electric motors are basically alternators but instead of generating electricity by being turned, they're turned using electricity and magnets. They generate frequencies as well when they're on and turning

  • @minimumwagemillionaire
    @minimumwagemillionaire 21 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

    If you're going on TH-cam for medical advice you deserve everything you get

    • @nixonmalasi8982
      @nixonmalasi8982 20 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      The doctor's a mainstream pushed weasel. How the people believe in these idiots staggers me

  • @jguo
    @jguo 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Love your content! Small correction - 1:16 most of the Sun’s UV radiation that reaches the Earth is non-ionising as the ionising far-UV is filtered out by the atmosphere.

    • @tawhid8125
      @tawhid8125 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      But what about ozone sphere damage, it means less filtering of UV

    • @Wahba.
      @Wahba. หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@tawhid8125fortunately thanks to regulations the ozone layer is actually recovering so UV is getting filtered out

  • @KaijuKim
    @KaijuKim 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +260

    If I heeded every article that presented a new study that something is bad for you I would die from either starvation, dehydration, or boredom. 😂

    • @pavlovs-wug
      @pavlovs-wug 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      I'm sure there's a paper floating around somewhere that sets out how anything can be considered harmful by one metric or another! Too much of anything is a bad thing, it's all about moderation. But unfortunately moderation does not engaging headlines make 😂

    • @TheGoddamnBacon
      @TheGoddamnBacon 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Or sobriety. But that's just me. Same with the other three.

    • @Esperologist
      @Esperologist 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Remember to sign the petition to ban dihydrogen-monoxide. High levels of it can be toxic, or result in oxygen deprivation. It's known to be among the most lethal substances on the planet.
      ^_^

    • @Dominik-vn6lo
      @Dominik-vn6lo 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Too much water can kill you. And we're not talking about drinking a bathtub, but just an amount you could easily have too much of on a hot day with too much physical activity.

    • @bsmlbn
      @bsmlbn 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      A new study shows: that continued belief in new studies can cause aids... It's true , a doctor on TH-cam said so (this is not a dig at Mike)

  • @rickyyt7305
    @rickyyt7305 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +22

    This is a topic regularly on my mind. I can’t express how appreciative I am to have dr Mike (and team) to have the expertise, reputation, and awareness to address this topic that is so relevant to millions of us. Dude, thank you!

  • @kaylaloris3228
    @kaylaloris3228 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +32

    The amount of time and effort that must have been put in to make this video is INSANE. I work in research and I cannot believe how fluidly he analyzes research and is able to explain it in such simple terms. It would take WEEKS for me to compile and analyze sources for a video like this. You’re awesome and thanks for inspiring me Dr. Mike!!

    • @MassiveGarbage
      @MassiveGarbage 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      He probably didn't research it. He probably had someone compile some lobbyists paid articles that got spoonfed to him.

  • @TheSpot200
    @TheSpot200 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +53

    0:58 my sound design brain thought he was talking about FM Modulation for a minute 🤣

    • @complexivetunes
      @complexivetunes 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You’re not alone 😂

  • @josiahpaez4601
    @josiahpaez4601 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Well done doctor Mike! This video was so well done! I can't tell you how many concerned mothers and aunts I've had to give this exact mini lesson to. I graduated tech school with a degree in electronics and worked with industrial machines that emitted x-rays and high level RF for a decade and your explanations and graphics were on point.
    The part that really helps click for them I've found is to be honest and admit that there may be danger there, but as you stated, the fact that there have been dozens if not hundreds of studies looking for danger but cannot establish a clear link suggests that it's probably not worth worrying about, there are so many other things to be more worried about first. In fact, I have a Geiger counter at home to play with as a hobby, most people are surprised to see that cell phones emit no ionizing radiation, but their granite countertops and ceramic dishes do (low/safe levels to be clear).
    Another thing that I find so cool and mind-blowing is that radio waves and infra red and uv and x-rays are literally the exact same thing as visible light. Uv and x-rays are dangerous because they are a high enough energy (frequency) above visible light (especially x-rays since they are ionizing). But radio (including cell phones) and IR are less energy than visible light, and nobody is running around freaking out about visible light being dangerous (unless you are a vampire).
    Also, to be clear, low energy light radiation (visible light and below, like IR, microwave, and radio) can still be harmful if it's wattage or your proximity to the source is close enough. For example, is the light emitting from a 60w lightbulb harmful? Most people would say no, but now hold your hand an inch away from the bulb and see how long you can keep it there before your hand heats up enough to start burning. And that effect would happen faster or from further away if you used a brighter/higher wattage bulb. For context, the wattage of a cell phone transmitter (think of it literally as a light bulb) is 3w at most during a pulse of transmission, only equivalent to 0.25w when averaged.

  • @LordEide
    @LordEide 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +242

    Just wait till they figure out that visible light is EMF with higher energy.

    • @jm-xh4yz
      @jm-xh4yz 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +32

      Lol facts .. people hear 'radiation' and freak out. Better get rid of my light bulbs and microwave while we're at it 😂

    • @undefinederror40404
      @undefinederror40404 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      Wait, it is? 😅
      I feel very failed by my biology and chemistry classes in highschool.

    • @LordEide
      @LordEide 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

      @@undefinederror40404 yes, higher frequency/wavelength means higher energy. Visible light is around 400nm(nanometers) to 700nm.
      Infrared/heat is about 780nm and 1mm
      microwaves are from around 1mm to 1m.
      And radio waves are 1m to hundreds of km.
      X-ray is 10nm to 0.01nm
      And gamma rays is everything smaller.
      Take this with a grain of salt. I am only a science enthusiast and don’t really know that much. This might also be very simplified.

    • @instant_mint
      @instant_mint 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Oh... you're right...! 😅 hmmm

    • @Jack-la
      @Jack-la 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@undefinederror40404 Yeah! Think about the phrase "electromagnetic spectrum". Electricity, magnetism, and light are all pretty much the same thing. Radio waves are light that falls outside of our vision. So are x-rays and UV rays.
      When they say "waves" they mean it literally. Big waves, like radio waves and visible light, are mostly harmless. Small waves, like ultraviolet (UV) and gamma, are tighter and have more energy, which are small enough to vibrate and damage things like cells and DNA.
      That's why we need to wear sunblock outdoors, but not indoors. Lightbulbs don't emit highly energetic UV light, but the sun does!

  • @ErusPhoebus
    @ErusPhoebus 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +109

    From a physics standpoint you can not exclude background radiation from man made and natural sources from any studies like it because it far out scale the energy and amount than the low range radiation from Bluetooth. Basically if RF is a cancer threat than i would be more worried about the living to close to a radio tower than my Bluetooth headset.

    • @thesinghzingkid
      @thesinghzingkid 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      and also from a physics standpoint, if the em radiation emitted from phones and bluetooth devices, caused cancer, then we should be living like vampires because visible light is higher frequency therefore higher energy therefore MORE ionizing.

    • @TheJohn8765
      @TheJohn8765 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I'd be more worried if I didn't live in a cave away from the Sun (jk, I don't). Radio waves go right thru windows and the Sun is a giant thermonuclear bomb constantly bombarding us with RF in levels *far* higher than some piddly BT radio. It's concerning that many people have so little scientific literacy they can't adequately weigh risks.

    • @vidal9747
      @vidal9747 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Your lamp is more dangerous if EMF is a problem. You should avoid electrical lamps. This is totally anti-scientific ridiculous fear mongering one step above flat earthers.

    • @jayerscios
      @jayerscios 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      What about living / working really close to or under a Cellphone Tower?

    • @riripebby
      @riripebby 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      @@jayersciossame thing, safe(r than even more plentiful things like artificial light)

  • @aguythatsagoosebutreallyis8970
    @aguythatsagoosebutreallyis8970 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +55

    Nothing like a Fresh Doctor Mike Video to start off my day!

  • @mallorypettersen7686
    @mallorypettersen7686 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    I love the idea of this series!!! So much misinformation out there from many sides!

  • @jairomejia616
    @jairomejia616 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +47

    The real danger of Bluetooth headphones or any headphones whatsoever is the risk of losing your hearing. We are the generation with highest risk of having lost hearing at a young age. The only reason are the heavily use of headphones with high volume.
    If you want to know more about it, Vox has a very well explained video.

    • @AZITHEMLGPRO
      @AZITHEMLGPRO 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      People don’t care

    • @ghostflame9211
      @ghostflame9211 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      we've known about this for years. i, and many of my friends in high school, were taken to the doctor for potential hearing loss due to how much we used headphones back then (06-10). its just that on a mass scale, no one cares. we have beats to bump ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

    • @StarCheesy
      @StarCheesy 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That’s why I keep the volume down as low as I can hear without issues

  • @AddisonShirely
    @AddisonShirely 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +113

    Video summarized
    Not really. It may do a little bit but it is so small that it doesn’t matter. We need more research on the topic

    • @PIZZAdayisback
      @PIZZAdayisback 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      This comment is actually on point!
      10/10

    • @immortalnub
      @immortalnub 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      It's most likely that it doesn't do anything at all. If we weren't exposed to it as much as we are today, then I doubt further studies would be conducted.

    • @Smoothbrain-nvrm
      @Smoothbrain-nvrm 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Thanks

    • @4paapii
      @4paapii 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thanks

  • @JJellMeister
    @JJellMeister 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +72

    It's still a crazy thing to research. We are bombarded with non ionizing radio waves literally every day. The intriguing thing about radio waves is that they can not touch our cells at all. They are either too big or do not have the crazy energy ultraviolet, xrays, and gamma rays contain to damage our cells. Some radiowaves are the size of a skyscraper.

    • @MonkeyJedi99
      @MonkeyJedi99 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Sometimes, the most harmful thing that gets into our skull is misinformation.
      Sure, a high-velocity piece of rebar is bad for the skull it hits, but misinformation can be contagious.

    • @TheJohn8765
      @TheJohn8765 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yah, there's at most mild heating at the site of impact but they don't go farther in than maybe an inch. If surface heating was enough to secondarily cause brain cancers, we'd all have already died from baseboard heaters or furnaces. You *can* get burns from malfunctioning radio towers (if you're a worker standing right next to it) or from idiots that pull out the magnetron from a microwave and use it unshielded. But that's levels several orders of magnitude higher than anything normal.

  • @voltage7498
    @voltage7498 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +388

    Wait till they find out UV rays

    • @immortalnub
      @immortalnub 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +57

      For real. If the Karens are so afraid of these devices, they should be wearing sunscreen whenever they go outside for anything.

    • @danamcgraw8777
      @danamcgraw8777 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +53

      They’re the same people who think uv light is actually good and sunblock bad

    • @MonkeyJedi99
      @MonkeyJedi99 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

      @@immortalnub Many Karens would improve life for others by staying in their homes.

    • @joes.4149
      @joes.4149 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@danamcgraw8777the only two people I know who say this are shredded and very healthy

    • @elapt1c
      @elapt1c 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      wait until they realize that the dirt they walk on is full of naturally radioactive materials

  • @eelnedroj
    @eelnedroj 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    Whenever I use bluetooth headsets or AirPods nonstop for a while I always get massive headaches and have to take a few weeks break. I'm back to using wired again and it feels better imo, unless for certain exercise or pooping then I crack and throw in the bluetooth again.

    • @oshunbleu6511
      @oshunbleu6511 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      I get pain in my ear and head shortly after wearing ear buds.
      I think it's related so not using bt anymore.

  • @danielclv97
    @danielclv97 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +28

    I mean, the longer you spend time with your phone, the less likely you are to have an active life, and usually people who use their phones too much ends up having their motivation and decision-making affected, leading to eating less healthy and more isolation, so I'd say EMF is one of the last thing we need to worry regarding long smart-phone use.

    • @steelclackers2611
      @steelclackers2611 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      To be honest the way you described it phones aren't the reason for this. They are a symptom of something else. If this something else be it dissatisfaction with life or perhaps loneliness, insecurity or mental health issues, won't be dealt with people will try to fill the hole with something else.

  • @suoretaw
    @suoretaw 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +33

    Dr. Mike, I’ve been watching your channel for years, and just want to say that I wholeheartedly support your efforts to fight misinformation. And I love how you approach these subjects: clearly, in an easy-to-understand manner, and with respect of your viewers and those you care for. Keep up the great work.

  • @SuiLagadema
    @SuiLagadema 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

    Read the difference between ionizing and non-ionizing radiation. That grandpa that we know, who smoke all his life and lived besides the radio died at 102; really doubt the radiation of the radio was the cause. The main danger is for people who hear at a way too high of a volume, damaging the tympanic membrane. Maybe something relating with cerumen but that's more for an ENT doc to explain more.

  • @jhaimes
    @jhaimes 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +22

    Thanks doc for this. A lot of people are confused by this and now we got an explanation, we won’t be confused anymore.

    • @ross-carlson
      @ross-carlson 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Oh how untrue that is - just read through the comments, you'll lose brain cells doing so...

    • @UlexiteTVStoneLexite
      @UlexiteTVStoneLexite 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Lol you have way too much hope if you think this will stop people from being confused

    • @chillphill13
      @chillphill13 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The age of information is truly the time to be least informed. If some people still believe the earth is flat, you bet your bum more people will believe the hoaxes

  • @rwfthesr
    @rwfthesr 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    You've done a great job!!! There were complaints about magnets in telephones in the 50s through 70. The greatest danger for most children and young adults is listening to music at 100% volume for hours and not needing surgery or hearing devices before they're 40. Keep up the good work!!!👍🏾

  • @FloatMan84
    @FloatMan84 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +40

    Imagine if these low frequency EMFs actually harmed us, and the moment we step out into the sun we’re like SpongeBob and Patrick looking up at the light in the nicknack shop.

    • @bjholland8322
      @bjholland8322 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That would be crazy😭

  • @Anthony-ib6cq
    @Anthony-ib6cq 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +877

    Short answer: No.
    Long answer:
    NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO.

    • @Mrannominmys129
      @Mrannominmys129 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

      Yes mobile is harmful than airpods😂😂

    • @19LG99
      @19LG99 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@valitsaki1924watch the video

    • @leroyj62
      @leroyj62 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@valitsaki1924 proves this is true by how stupid his comment is! Brain cancer in full form!

    • @jordangramer2145
      @jordangramer2145 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@valitsaki1924the chemical makeup of our food, lotions and ointments, soaps, scents, and just about everything is also brand new.

    • @AlexGraves-em5mt
      @AlexGraves-em5mt 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +30

      @@valitsaki1924ur just wrong and u don’t know how cancer works

  • @kmpkmt
    @kmpkmt 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    My Mom tells me this constantly so I'm so excited to hear this one!

  • @Mystery041
    @Mystery041 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    I've known this forever and have been trying to tell people about this. It's annoying that they don't listen when I only try to help them. Thank you for finally bringing light to this!

    • @DuskyDaily
      @DuskyDaily 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Ask them to live in the dark then, Visible light is exactly the same radiation just with millions times more energy. Living beings emit higher energy and amounts of radiation all the time, that's how a lot of thermometers work

  • @Fazelcp
    @Fazelcp 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This is one of the first things our professors explained to us while I was studying for my Telecommunication engineering degree. There are regulations for antennas about the radiation levels based on tons of studies and the levels are fractions of what was found as even slightly dangerous. On top of this there is a whole category of studies for everything that is in close contact with human bodies and the engineering is always around blasting as few radiation as possible towards us (even while inside those boundaries from the regulations). Phones for example reduce the radiations towards our faces (so through the screens).
    I'm happy to see someone with a big community sharing this knowledge and debunking these fears :)

  • @4RILDIGITAL
    @4RILDIGITAL 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    This dispels many misconceptions about Bluetooth headphones. As with many things, moderation is key. Awareness about the potential risks and taking preemptive actions should be done.

  • @ptrinch
    @ptrinch 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +70

    A single phone is probably fine, but a neighbor of mine used to carry three cell phones when at work and ended up getting cancer. I always thought it was weird, but apparently, the safety measured at the uranium plant where he worked required him to carry multiple phones.

    • @FirstSynapse
      @FirstSynapse 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

      😂

    • @augustuslunasol10thapostle
      @augustuslunasol10thapostle 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Well ill be

    • @Ericericericericericeric
      @Ericericericericericeric 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

      I don’t think it was the cell phone that gave him cancer. I think it was the uranium😂

    • @spicybaguette7706
      @spicybaguette7706 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      ​@@Ericericericericericericthat's the joke ;P

  • @NhatNguyen-577
    @NhatNguyen-577 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +218

    Was ready to put my phone away and enjoy a peaceful lunch break.
    Dr Mike uploaded.
    -> Phone back on + airpods in. 🤣

    • @LoganT547
      @LoganT547 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I guess I'm cooked then, literally. I use Bluetooth headphones/earbuds almost every day and wear a smartwatch.

  • @mythgamerr
    @mythgamerr 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +468

    Everything's toxic nowadays, we're not living but surviving I guess..

    • @breakingbadest9772
      @breakingbadest9772 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +37

      Everything being toxic is quite true in America.

    • @Wintergatanaddict
      @Wintergatanaddict 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      thats just your little funny country

    • @lilcoffee6528
      @lilcoffee6528 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      that’s just silly little America putting too much money on the military :3 🌸🌿🍄

    • @Alton7771
      @Alton7771 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      This is like the same thing that happened when microwave were invented.

    • @ross-carlson
      @ross-carlson 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      No, "everything" is NOT toxic, this is the kind of bullshit that scares people for NO REASON. Very little of what is around us is actually toxic and the things that are we KNOW ABOUT - and bluetooth is NOT one of those things.
      Please stop making such bullshit sweeping statements like that - YOU are the problem here. YOU.

  • @Garr3tth
    @Garr3tth 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Excellent video, Dr Mike!
    One thing to add would be that if you look at the light (RF) spectrum, from low energy to high energy, it goes:
    - non-ionizing: radio waves, mirowaves, infrared, visible, UV
    - ionizing: UV, X-Rays, Gamma-Rays
    Hence, radiowaves and microwaves have lower energy than visible light! Yet, somehow, no one is afraid to turn on a lightbulb at night and i have seen no studies checking the effect of visible light on cancers.
    While they cannot bump electrons from atoms at these wavelengths (wavelength (m) or frequency (Hz) ~ energy; different from emission power (W) ), the thing that they can do is heat tissue (think microwaves at 1000W or ~10000x the power of a cell phone; or think a magnifying glass concentrating visible light to heat something and burn it). This is why we have VERY conservative power limits with built in safety margins (cellphones max is about 0.3W; cell towers max ~20W; microwave heats at about 1000W for 1-2mins in a cavity designed to keep everything bouncing around so as to use the waves multiple times until they dissipate; think cats' eyes).
    The last thing is that we typically have the emission power (power emitted at the source) and also have a formula to calculate the power at a certain point and distance away (reception power), with the emission power being the maximum, and decreasing with distance and directivity. This makes it so it wouldn't matter if the source is right next to your ear (airpods) or in your pocket (cellphones). 1W of received power next to your ear is 1W of received power no matter if the power was greater when it left the cell phone in your pocket, the cell tower down the street or your neighbour's the wifi router.

    • @ShadowofManda
      @ShadowofManda 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      This is the reply I wanted to write, but couldn't figure out the wording. Thank you! So many people forget how the EMF spectrum actually works and just shout bullshit into the ether.

  • @bourjeee
    @bourjeee 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

    Most phones dont even have mini jack ports anymore and you will have a job finding a nice set of headphones or plugs with a wire

    • @pavlovs-wug
      @pavlovs-wug 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Tho you can get a Bluetooth adaptor with a headphone jack 🤣 improvise adapt overcome haha!

    • @Farathus
      @Farathus 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Just use wired headphones? Instead of the 3.5mm plug they now come with USB-C

    • @dakotawilliams4337
      @dakotawilliams4337 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Or just use a adapter if you still have a working 3.5 wired headphone that you use

  • @shriramsreejith7299
    @shriramsreejith7299 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Doctors like u should be more in this world

  • @Rilesthegamergeek
    @Rilesthegamergeek 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

    We have been surrounded by radio waves since the 20s. Visible light has many times more energy than radio waves. A TV remote emits higher frequency radiation than a cell phone. Radio wavelength is measured in kilometers. Way too long to do anything to a tiny human.

    • @socire72
      @socire72 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Pretty sure the Soviet over the horizon radar (i forget the name) was so strong that it interfered with radios all over the world (wookpecker frequency??). Yet we’re all still alive.

  • @zombeaver69
    @zombeaver69 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    It's good that we have studies on this. Tech often evolves before our medical understanding of it.

  • @muthonihellen8530
    @muthonihellen8530 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    I admit I have learnt a lot from the cute Doc. 90% learning 10% gawking at how adorable he is. Totally makes my day especially when playing with Bear & Ribby.

  • @darkwinter6028
    @darkwinter6028 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +28

    Cell phones are not a cancer risk, and we know this because before about 1980 there were no cell phones, and by 2000 everyone had one. Cancer rates did not rise.

    • @SugerSprinkledFun
      @SugerSprinkledFun 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

      Cancer rates have most definitely risen. A simple google search will show this. But not from cell phones. Mostly likely from food and environmental factors. Bowels cancers especially are rising every year, particularly among younger people.

    • @MassiveGarbage
      @MassiveGarbage 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@SugerSprinkledFun Probably from chemicals used in food approved by the same government that says this radiation is safe lol

    • @mcrchickenluvr
      @mcrchickenluvr 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      Yes they have risen just not from cell phone use. It’s all of the stuff we do to and put in our bodies. Even the foods and drinks that should be safe like veggies and such. You step outside and you expose yourself to carcinogens.

    • @anthonyanderson9326
      @anthonyanderson9326 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      They have risen astronomically

  • @Atsumari
    @Atsumari 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    Back in my community health classes when I was finishing my bachelors degree someone had mentioned this in the preventative medicine class. The Doctor Who teaches the class who was an MD who specifically researches health trends said that there are so many other carcinogens that are much more dangerous that we’re exposed to on a daily basis, and that for the average person, the connection between severity and potential for actual cause of cancer is so low that there are other things that should be focused on like stopping smoking, decreasing pollution levels in the air, dealing with micro plastics and chemicals that are in hygiene and personal care products as well as chemicals in cosmetics. In addition, there is the problem related to antibiotics in the food we eat. There’s a lot to unpack here, but basically there’s other things we should be worrying about.

    • @spazzyshortgirl23
      @spazzyshortgirl23 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Which is hilarious bc farmers don’t sell antibiotic filled meat and animal products: they literally get in trouble for detectable levels. A test that reveals antibiotics in a truck of milk the ENTIRE TRUCK goes down the drain

    • @Atsumari
      @Atsumari 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@spazzyshortgirl23 Yeah, but it still doesn't change the fact that people believe it exists. Even if something is wrong, if the public believes it is true, it is public health's job to combat that misinformation and ensure people know the facts.

    • @bryant475
      @bryant475 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Yeah, but we could decrease risk of ALL of them. I'll stick to wired earphones, turning off WiFi at night, using 4G, minimizing use of plastics, natural shampoo and body wash, Whole Food Plant Based Nutrition, and so on.

  • @jennikane6815
    @jennikane6815 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    I was just diagnosed with breast cancer, could you do a video on invasive ductal carcinoma? This type of breast cancer is on the rise and it's also the type that affects men as well as women.

    • @anniewall7217
      @anniewall7217 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Dr. I know something is wrong with me I'm very sick. But recent doctor, an Oncologist, examination and CRT showed no sign of cancer. Name of doctor that have EMF patients in DC, Maryland, VA, or any state locations I may contact please advise ASAP. Thanks!!

  • @امنهيان-ج1ن
    @امنهيان-ج1ن 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I been watching you for five years and learned so much thank you dr mike 😊

  • @MacCrunch
    @MacCrunch 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The breakdown of data and studies is impressive. It certainly reduces certain fears and misconceptions about Bluetooth headphones and their radiation emissions.

  • @petitepenguin
    @petitepenguin 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +201

    Me who has my headphones on 24x7 💀

  • @Sports4me7
    @Sports4me7 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Have you ever thought about trying to do an interview with RFK? Seems like you'd be the perfect kind of platform for it

  • @englishtranslator1604
    @englishtranslator1604 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Hey Doctor Mike, your take on AirPods is so informative and engaging! Thanks for keeping us in the loop with your awesome content❤

  • @regalwithbooksinside
    @regalwithbooksinside 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I had a physics teacher in middle school who tried to convince us about this myth and the cherry on top is that he is now my sister's head teacher. Glad you made this video!

  • @Ruchir2008
    @Ruchir2008 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Thank you, bro, it means a lot and helps a lot, may God bless you 😀👍

  • @nbassasin8092
    @nbassasin8092 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +25

    6:48 my early 2000s kids brain immediately went "so the FCC wont let me be, or let me be me, so let me see"

    • @Poyni
      @Poyni 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      They're tryna shut me down on MTV, but it feels so empty without me

    • @DVLVideos
      @DVLVideos 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I continued it but youtube removed my content bruv :)

  • @Swiftbinbag
    @Swiftbinbag 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

    Not everyone wearing bluetooth headpones and airpods watching this

    • @Franzotm
      @Franzotm 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Nah I got wired apple buds on. Because I'm using my laptop.

    • @danibell106
      @danibell106 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@Franzotmu can use Bluetooth on ur laptop too?

    • @Franzotm
      @Franzotm 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@danibell106 Ye but I had wired ones on and some people are saying that this won't give U a brain tumour.

    • @danibell106
      @danibell106 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Franzotm bro wireless ones also won't give u a brain tumor, that's explained in the video

    • @Franzotm
      @Franzotm 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@danibell106 Oh ok and I didn't watch it

  • @theperfectbotsteve4916
    @theperfectbotsteve4916 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

    people really forget that visible light is radiation

    • @LoganT547
      @LoganT547 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Probably the same people who say the earth is flat and 5G causes cancer 💀

  • @hollylockhart9423
    @hollylockhart9423 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    As part of a course I was leading a seminar on, last year I read a recent paper on effect of prolonged EMF from cell phones and headsets being used to make phone calls on stress and cardiac health using a very large British sample: Cell phone use was quantified based on ~2010 levels of use, not present day, to look at the downstream effects of high exposure. And it found headset use to make phone calls 15 years ago (not likely to be Bluetooth) was associated with present day worse health. Specifically usage to make phone calls over 30 hours a week, in people with lower SES. The main flaw (imo) in this study was that it didn't take into account why the cellphone use was so high, and it is more likely that what the study found was that having a JOB where you have to be on the phone all day (e.g. call center, operator, dispatch) is stressful.
    It is really hard to do this kind of population level study and I'm glad they could put the data out for others to see.

  • @iyl78
    @iyl78 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thanks for doing this. I'm an electrical engineer, extremely familiar with the tech using all of these devices, and I can't tell you how often people have asked me about this exact subject. I've debunked it every time, and people have been very appreciative that I've taken the time, but perhaps this video will just be easier and less time consuming for me to send it instead of lecturing the people I meet!

  • @MacyWRLD
    @MacyWRLD 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    2:23 10 to 400 that’s a huge range that could basically mean anything

    • @bodyweightbob8669
      @bodyweightbob8669 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I find it odd when stat ranges are so wide, like I had blood work done recently and the range of normal for one of the items was an 8x from low to high. It would seem like there should be a tighter range. Maybe exponentially diminishing returns or effects? But still seems weird.
      If I had 10x more $$$ or 400x more $$$, I want the 400x or much closer to that lol.

    • @jessepinkman5198
      @jessepinkman5198 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The point is just that it is, even if it’s on the higher end, not in any way dangerous

    • @LiamGervaise
      @LiamGervaise 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      No it could basically mean between 10-400 😽

  • @hendo896
    @hendo896 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +45

    Bro as soon as i put my headphones in this pops up

  • @sprinklednights
    @sprinklednights 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

    Trusting a Medium article is like trusting Goop.

  • @JunkionMarnot2005
    @JunkionMarnot2005 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Another great video from Dr. Mike. Very timely, on a practical subject.
    Great job Mike!

  • @suellenterroso
    @suellenterroso 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    ❤ This is really helpfull to me as a healthcare student. I had to be already a graduated but that is it! Amazing info. 🙏 Much respect to you Dr. Mike.

    • @suellenterroso
      @suellenterroso 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Manufactured foods and Plastic are more like to cause cancer. Unfortunately. 😢

    • @suellenterroso
      @suellenterroso 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Sugar, Carbohidrates and BPA are more likely to be harmful for people.

    • @suellenterroso
      @suellenterroso 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      We're only aware to know if It can cause cancer is when We all get old.

  • @eiennonakama
    @eiennonakama 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    7:52 Now I wonder what SAR my hearing aids have.

    • @jayerscios
      @jayerscios 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I recently got a BT connected HA. I'm super sensitive and have some neck/head pain - cervicogenic headaches. The HA connected to BT was making my headaches worse. When I researched it and contacted the manufacturer, I found out the the BT connection uses even less energy than a BT headset. Unfortunately, I still had no choice but to not use the HA with BT. I can use a cellphone BT headset. go figure!

  • @Hypnos828
    @Hypnos828 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    9:15 You’re welcome🖤

    • @optimised120
      @optimised120 26 วันที่ผ่านมา

      You don’t have a long enough attention span to watch a ten minute video 😂

    • @Hypnos828
      @Hypnos828 26 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@optimised120I obviously did to find the answer kid

  • @featheredskeptic1301
    @featheredskeptic1301 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +22

    The bottom line is that both cell phones and bluetooth headphones are in mass use in years and decades. If there was a cancer risk it would be noticeable by now. The rates of brain cancer would be surging as compare to the rates say 30 years ago. Any electromagnetic wave can be described as radiation. Phones usually emit milliwatts (can go to several watts) of RF power at around 850MHz to 5GHz (for 5G). Those frequencies are orders of magnitude lower than those of sunlight. Yet, conspiracy theorists aren't afraid exposing themselves to a high energy radiation with typical intensity of 1KW/m2 when they go to the beach, but at the same time are terrified of a cell phone or bluetooth headphones that have much lower energy, and they transmit it with much lower intensity.

  • @juliejl1179
    @juliejl1179 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Я балдею от ваших видео. Вы такой умный дядька!❤️❤❤

  • @sarahmortimer2860
    @sarahmortimer2860 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I’m really grateful for this research, Dr. Mike. Someone I am somewhat acquainted with believes in the harmful effects of radiation from sleeping with your cell phone by your head, but truth be told, there isn’t enough actual evidence to back this up. As a Christian with a lot of faith behind me, I thrive on evidence based belief (from my own experiences as well as proofs in the world). Keep up the great work!

  • @Treksh
    @Treksh 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +21

    The real shame is so many companies are removing headphone jacks left and right so most people have a extra step of buying a dongle if they want to use wired headphones. Even a small barrier like this turns countless people to the ewaste battery powered wireless earphones.

    • @thorbear
      @thorbear 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      E-waste wireless earphones? As opposed to e-waste wired earphones?
      I know it's popular to complain about planned obsolescence, but the two most recent wireless head/earphones I purchased have lasted longer than any wired set I ever owned. I remember going through many pairs of wired sets, where especially the wire itself was prone to breaking.

  • @jonooo1
    @jonooo1 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Bro you look exactly like Ben Stone from the Manifest series... 😂😂😂

    • @seanevans7636
      @seanevans7636 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I’ve said the same thing…

    • @DontFuckWitDreDay
      @DontFuckWitDreDay 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Bro!!! I WAS GOING TO ASK Ben Stone on his Reddit "ask me anything" if he randomly made a TH-cam video on this topic.

  • @terriwetz6077
    @terriwetz6077 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    At this point in my life I'm simply tired of hearing about this, that, or the other is going to do all these bad things. It all comes down to using tech, eating certain foods, doing or not doing some type of activity, in moderation. If I had listened to even a quarter of all the stuff that was supposed to be bad for me, I'd probably be the most miserable person on earth. Common sense people, common sense.

  • @ceciliainnes2586
    @ceciliainnes2586 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Im so glad to hear! Now I’ll feel so much more comfortable about using my air pods. What a relief!

  • @Hy-wm5bv
    @Hy-wm5bv 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I love how all videos ultimately helps us understand what scientific evidence means, and what it does not!

  • @Peachmain1
    @Peachmain1 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    I think if it was completely true everyone would be suffering from a sickness

    • @marshaltito7369
      @marshaltito7369 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Well we might not necessarily know or connect the dots properly. A lot of people didn't realize Lead was in gasoline and that has caused a lot of problems.

    • @meisterbrother
      @meisterbrother 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@marshaltito7369 They put lead in the gasoline on purpose to act as a stabilizer and the guy who proposed it almost died from lead poisoning. They knew it was not good for you but they did it anyway for the money of the patent. Just be thankful for all of the the safety research that people do now before a product is released to the public.

    • @bensemusx
      @bensemusx 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@marshaltito7369the health issues of lead had been known long before leaded gasoline.

    • @anthonyanderson9326
      @anthonyanderson9326 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Look around

  • @zachmandernach6650
    @zachmandernach6650 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Many people experience sickness being around large levels of EMF. I feel sick if I put my phone to my ear for more than a couple seconds, I’m gonna listen to my body over studies.

    • @sem_skywalker
      @sem_skywalker 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Same here... Brain also functions better out in the forest than in the city "for some strange reason"...

    • @hitmusicworldwide
      @hitmusicworldwide 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      So you should join the Amish.

    • @paulandreasallik
      @paulandreasallik 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Placebo

  • @BunkerSquirrel
    @BunkerSquirrel 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I’m pretty sure my hobby of “touching grass” is gonna kill me faster than Bluetooth.

  • @lelouchlibritannia3771
    @lelouchlibritannia3771 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you Dr Mike for addressing this.

  • @Codes97
    @Codes97 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thanks for translating your videos by yourself!

  • @harshthechampful
    @harshthechampful 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    4:45 Micah from RDR2 reference

  • @kiwivol3
    @kiwivol3 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    not me watching this with bluetooth headphones on 😭😂

  • @DeX9O2
    @DeX9O2 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

    Want to know what’s toxic? Stressing about everything being toxic.

    • @joeNotexotic579
      @joeNotexotic579 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      why even strees about it anymore who cares anymore

    • @Art.and.Hamsters
      @Art.and.Hamsters 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Yeah, the secret to a long life is to reduce stress.

  • @geer2148
    @geer2148 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    i didnt expect i would ever write such a basic comment, but this video is very informative and interesting! u got a new subscriber

  • @CuriosityKitty-j5j
    @CuriosityKitty-j5j 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thanks Dr Mike for this , it puts my mind at rest .

  • @mr.rainbowlovescoffee
    @mr.rainbowlovescoffee 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Dr Mike why are you bored😂😂 0:01

    • @mikey4tkins
      @mikey4tkins 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      enough internet for you

    • @mr.rainbowlovescoffee
      @mr.rainbowlovescoffee 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@mikey4tkins 🤣🤣 love it

  • @PUFFER-nl2wg
    @PUFFER-nl2wg 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +59

    life is getting more screwed up the longer we live

    • @ross-carlson
      @ross-carlson 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      No, it's getting BETTER - if you want to live like healthcare is in the 70's go right ahead but the rest of us will enjoy the benefits of modern society and science.

    • @Sabre613
      @Sabre613 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      Societally we are definitely messed up but technologically & medicinally we’re at the best point we’ve ever been

    • @reformedchinesecommunist
      @reformedchinesecommunist 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Sabre613modern tech requires a lot of money so healthcare will continue to explode in cost as the care gets better and better. We are close to only the rich being able to afford healthcare meaningfully now.

    • @FunkyBananaBear
      @FunkyBananaBear 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      So.... just say you didn't watch the video lmao.

    • @soupofdoom4542
      @soupofdoom4542 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      @@reformedchinesecommunist even for the average person, right now, healthcare is better than it's ever been and it is not going down.

  • @nokitanada7390
    @nokitanada7390 9 วันที่ผ่านมา +3

    Low Tech = Long Life

  • @kihaakui792
    @kihaakui792 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Already knowing the answer just watching for Doctor Mike!

  • @prosandcons-fl2cc
    @prosandcons-fl2cc 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I really appreciate this series

  • @the_doubting_thomas
    @the_doubting_thomas 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I still remember a few years ago - there were concerns/reports that having your phone in your pants pocket caused radiation to your genital regions, in your shirt pocket caused heart problems, and if you held the phone up to your ear and talked a lot it caused brain cancer. Funny how they no longer mention any of that.