or better yet a BF1 style Battlefield game set during the civil war th-cam.com/video/9aIvFO-JY80/w-d-xo.html Confederate victory: "At the time of the Gettysburg battle, Confederate Vice President Alexander H. Stephens was travelling towards Washington DC intending to negotiate peace between the Confederacy and the United States. With a confederate victory at Gettysburg and Washington DC under the threat of General Lee's Army. It is possible that President Lincoln would welcome Stephens into the city to negotiate peace, ending the war on Confederate terms. Upon General Lee's defeat at Gettysburg, President Lincoln rejected this meeting. Opting to continue the war until its bloody end." Union Victory: "The Battle of Gettysburg was the bloodiest battle of the entire war with combined casualties of over 40,000 soldiers. The defeat of General Lee came as a great relief to Union soldiers who bore the brunt of General Lee's seemingly endless victories. The Battle of Gettysburg is marked as a turning point in the American Civil War. Ending the Confederate invasion of the North and forcing the Confederate Armies to retreat back to Virginia, with a reinvigorated Union Army not far behind."
I thought there was a Call Of Duty game about American Civil War released in PS2 back in 04 or 05, I remember playing it but not sure if it was really a COD spinoff like COD: Big Red One
unfortunately it wouldn't just fit the fast pace of cod people know and are use too. they would be pissed if that were to happened and with a lack of guns in during the civil war if you minus out the impractical designs it wouldn't really fit well
I genuinly love games like these where you get to play as the losing side in a conflict. I only wish the WW2 games occasionally gave us full Wehrmacht campaigns, seeing as how 'The Last Tiger' was arguably one of the best missions in the last one.
The modern left will interpret any chance of allowing the Wehrmacht to either succeed in battle or show any semblance of humanity as being "on the wrong side of history"...... even though it could very well have been one of the many historical battles which they won (like Crete, Market Garden, Kasserine Pass, Norwegian Campaign, etc) LOL.
I feel like this game incompassed almost everything of the Western zeitgeist. Civil War, Pinkertons, corrupt lawmen, bandit posses, Apache, Navajo, the exotic Mexico, mining corporations, the archetypal cowboy, the archetypal vigilante... you name it!
they kind of did with the history channel games but you have to sacrifice so much historical accuracy to make these kinda of games fun, that you might as well just make your own steampunk war instead and avoid the controversy.
The Civil War is a game thats barely touched on by AAA video games, I'd like to see that expanded upon. Maybe someone would make an alternate history game where the Confederacy held out and the Union signed a white peace with them, thus allowing to CSA to exist into the 1900's (until either of the world wars, where I feel like the USA and the CSA would use the chaos in Europe as an excuse to declare war on one another)
this game was cool, although a bit simple and repetitive, the story and voice acting was very good. There is so much potential for development, I really hope they bring these sorts of historical games back.
If there’s ever a civil war game: 1. The brutality has to be there. Remember getting shot with a 55 cal mini ball is going to rip you and your horse apart. 2. Slavery can’t be wishy washed like it is here. McCalls have an industrial plantation with its own river docks. It’s not a family farm. 3. Historical accuracy should be the spotlight over gameplay like the OG CoD and MoH games. They should cover all “4” theaters. Far West out in Texas, mid west ie shilo, East - Gettysburg, and the oceanic theatre with iron clads. Civil war would be so fun to explore through a games medium. There was so many innovations, battle trains, proto battleships, railroad cannons, repeating weapons, and Gatling guns albeit in the final days of the war, submarines, and the first every tank. That’s right in the siege of Richmond the CSA unveiled a prototype for a steam powered “tent” like tank that could be delivered on by train tracks or self propelled. Like that would be the dopest ending to a civil war game. Playing as USCT in Richmond and bamb off loads a fucking tank from a rail road.
When southern soldiers donned their uniforms, "I'm doing this for slavery" would have been the LEAST thing on their minds. The interpretation of the southern cause is a total lie from the mainstream media narrative.
@Edgelord Priestess Of Waifustan, came here to say this. The north had slaves too and were just as racist as the south. Lincoln waged a war without congressional approval to keep the economic and territorial interests of the south under federal control. The fact that people actually think that every time union soldiers dawned their blue outfits they thought to themselves "im doing this to free black people" is laughable. So much history has been falsified
@@smokingcrab2290 The North had effectively abolished slavery by 1805, it most certainly did not have any by the time of the American Civil War. As far as Lincoln was concerned this was the suppression of a rebellion which endangered the integrity of the United States, and seeing how the rest of the government actively increased the strength of the Army and Navy along with suspending habeas corpus It's fair to say they were willing to work with Lincoln on this. I highly doubt there are people who genuinely think every man in the Union military put their life on the line to free slaves or every Confederate to defend the practice. What is obvious is that the actions of both sides ultimately furthered their respective goals. The actions of the Union led to their victory and the subsequent end to slavery where the South sought to preserve it and ultimately lost.
I mean, kinda hard to take a neutral stance on the Civil War. There was very clearly a wrong side and you can’t just side-step the whole slavery thing. It was kinda a big deal at the time.
@colin plocinski Also the uniforms are quite wrong: Confederates didn't used shoulder rank insigna, it was only used in the Union uniforms, and for officiers.. Officers in the south used collars rank insignas (1 bar for 2nd Lieutenants, 2 for 1st Lieutenants, 3 for Captains, 1 star for Majors, 2 for Lieutenant-Colonels, 3 for Colonels..) and both camps used large rank insignas on the arms for Corporals, Sargents etc.. (much like in WW2, but with insignas pointing downwards instead of upwards) ;)
@@jamesritter1113 Well.. "artistic license - history". Akin to how Call of Duty Black Ops gets 1977 Steyr AUG Austrian bullpup assault rifle for a game that is set on 1968-1969. They took liberty in history accuracy just to make the game fun.
Because the Gettysburg Address is the biggest propaganda coup in history, people say "propaganda like Goebbels" but really they should say "propaganda like Lincoln". A confederacy isn't unique to America, it's basically a stronger form of alliance and mutual interest with states. It's just that people, thanks to Lincoln's propaganda, like to link slavery to any ideal of a Confederacy of states that decentralizes power.
@@AFGuidesHD America intially was a true confederacy which failed to function since the states would not support the legislation and requests of the federal government on basic things such as paying off the nation's debts and making good on taxes, hence why America became more centralized as time went on. What Hood referred to explicitly as "The Confederacy" refers to the 1861 Confederate States of America which was a traitorous movement and remains as such because Lincoln was correct. The documented and proven reason for the Confederates States of America's attempted succession was to preserve the institution of slavery, not to form a book-definition confederacy as the structure remained as centralized as its northern counterpart in comparison. There was no "propaganda" when the C.S.A. was, by definition, an insurrection led by the wealthy to secure the right to enslave of African Americans, as was their method of industry over widescale mechanization like in the North. The C.S.A. was nothing but a legion of traitors who we hold no heritage to, no more no less.
@@BDubH22 Yes and George Washington and his supporters were traitors and nothing more than rebels. Difference is the British Empire didn't make a big thing about slavery despite banning it a mere 20 years later (and about 60 before Lincoln thought anything about it). "There was no "propaganda"" There was because there is documented and proven reason that Lincoln didn't care about slavery until the southern states refused to re-join the Union and rejected proposals that would have seen slavery protected.
@@AFGuidesHD George Washington held a commission in the British military, he betrayed the British Empire and gave up all he knew to form a new government that safeguarded the rights of the individual, in a highly paraphrased statement. Much more noble than rebelling against the government because Lincoln planned on phasing out slavery (Thus making cotton and other crops much less profitable to produce) in my own opinion. Lincoln initially wanted to completely ban the institution of slavery but withheld on such action as to appease the C.S.A. It was convenient then that, with the war dragging on and morale dropping, that he held onto his true intentions to give the Gettysburg Address to hone in on the moral purpose of the war. After the address morale was through the roof and the North fought with renewed vigor since "We need to reunite the country!" wasn't enough alone to justify the brutal attrition suffered. It was good political maneuvering, morale is hard to keep high and he held onto a trump card until the time was right. The South would had been compensated over a multi-year plan to phase out slavery with the federal buy-out of current slave contracts. The war was purely over the institution of slavery and the C.S.A. attempting to preserve it. I'm a Southerner, it's criminal that people in my region hold reverence to traitors. There is no justification or vindication for the actions of the greedy, treasonous, and inhumane.
@@BDubH22 "that safeguarded the rights of the individual" certain wealthy individuals at least. What do you think about Washington being a slave owner ? "it's criminal that people in my region hold reverence to traitors" i'm british and i agree ;)
I still play the history channel civil war game from 06 every blue moon. Pretty fun to me. Not the best but not trash either imo. Worth pulling out the 360 for 😂
@@adolfgaming1761 strangely enough the Gatling gun did exist during the civil war, but only a handful of them were used by the Union. But, it doesn’t look like that thing in the game. It wasn’t automatic, it was manually cranked.
"Damn bro, they fought so well! No way they'll lose Atlanta!" "Even if they do lose, I bet the capture of Atlanta would be treated like any other city's capture and involve no controversial events!"
Well since EA hired new DICE developers which are mostly left people, they will most likely take everything out like slaves or just in general make the game for kids sorta like 2042
Uhmmm, dynamite in 1864?! It would be patented in 1867 in England. What they used during the Civil War was powder, it took almost 4 metric tonnes of powder to make that great boom during the Battle of the Crater.
I remember this game and I kept on yelling "COME AT ME YOU YANKEE SONS OF BITCHES!." just laughing my ass of while killing every federal who came.... It was glorious
I bet those soldiers wished they had level actions in real life - but by far the most common weapon on both sides were rifled percussion lock muskets I can see why they wouldn't make you use one of those in a game like this though
@@SStupendous yeah, but what's that number compared to the north of 2 million soldiers that participated in the war? (also that vast majority of that number were on the union side)
One thing I find interesting about this is that the narration calls the battle of Sharpsburg Antietam, to the South it was called the Battle of Sharpsburg not Antietam creek.
I guess its because the CSA lost and that Antietam is more widely known. Its like anything in history in modern media. Imagine calling "Stalingrad" the "Battle of the Volga". People wouldn't know what you're talking about.
I find it hilarious in the beginning of the video he says they defend the family "farm." Lmfao They didn't wanna use the word plantation when your playing as the southerners 🤣
The uniforms are wrong. The flags are wrong. The way they reload black powder revolvers is wrong. But besides those things this looks like it could be a good game.
Wars that could be used to be make a good COD game The Civil War Franco-Prussian War World War I Napoleonic Wars Seven Years War American Revolution Mexican-American War Etc. I could go on & on guys. Yet companies are milking WW2 drier than a camels asshole
They’re using a Winchester repeater that was developed after the war. The closest thing to whats in the game is a Henry repeater which looks drastically different.
@@SStupendous No. The receivers are very different, Henry receiver it longer. It’s method of loading is drastically different. Henry is much longer. The way it ejects spent casings is different.
@@cadeallan7139 I seen it but I mean battlefield should actually dedicate time into a realistic civil war battlefield. Like that's mainly where the war took place was fields lol. And it'd be nice to not get carpet bombed by an aircraft or helicopter mged every second. I wanna defend something and have someone try to get in my face to win. Not get sweeped up from a one click button method.
@@michaelmain6319 If you've seen it, you know it's a game battlefield wouldn't have any business being in. Have you seen the historical accuracy of their games? It's horrendous. War of Rights actually provides a realistic experience and is historically accurate in 99% of it's content. Accurate battlefields, accurate uniforms, accurate weapons, etc. We all know EA could never make a game like that, simply because it would never sell.
@@cadeallan7139 I have seen the game, and I love it. But even with historical inaccuracy I think battlefield could make a really good civil war game. Based of the larger player and map scales. I really don't get why players get angry with historical accuracy, you can't make a widely played game with historical accuracy. I'm sorry you just don't especially if it's only on one Console/PC.
No they would mess it up like 2042. You see EA has hired new DICE devs that are the biggest snowflakes on the planet. They would make a civil hero shooter game
@@AFGuidesHD Just done some research and yup your right. But some parts of it stared in 1607 with the founding of Jamestown and with it’s expansion and golden age between 1865-1890 with most of it falling in 1912 but most of it did’nt fall until the capture of pancho villa in 1920.
With gameplay this good…I wonder why there hasn’t been a CoD game about the civil war.
or better yet a BF1 style Battlefield game set during the civil war
th-cam.com/video/9aIvFO-JY80/w-d-xo.html
Confederate victory:
"At the time of the Gettysburg battle, Confederate Vice President Alexander H. Stephens was travelling towards Washington DC intending to negotiate peace between the Confederacy and the United States. With a confederate victory at Gettysburg and Washington DC under the threat of General Lee's Army. It is possible that President Lincoln would welcome Stephens into the city to negotiate peace, ending the war on Confederate terms. Upon General Lee's defeat at Gettysburg, President Lincoln rejected this meeting. Opting to continue the war until its bloody end."
Union Victory:
"The Battle of Gettysburg was the bloodiest battle of the entire war with combined casualties of over 40,000 soldiers. The defeat of General Lee came as a great relief to Union soldiers who bore the brunt of General Lee's seemingly endless victories. The Battle of Gettysburg is marked as a turning point in the American Civil War. Ending the Confederate invasion of the North and forcing the Confederate Armies to retreat back to Virginia, with a reinvigorated Union Army not far behind."
Too sensitive and controversial
I thought there was a Call Of Duty game about American Civil War released in PS2 back in 04 or 05, I remember playing it but not sure if it was really a COD spinoff like COD: Big Red One
Because a majority of the weapons would take a long time to reload lol
unfortunately it wouldn't just fit the fast pace of cod people know and are use too. they would be pissed if that were to happened and with a lack of guns in during the civil war if you minus out the impractical designs it wouldn't really fit well
I genuinly love games like these where you get to play as the losing side in a conflict. I only wish the WW2 games occasionally gave us full Wehrmacht campaigns, seeing as how 'The Last Tiger' was arguably one of the best missions in the last one.
I mean, there's plenty of games where you play as britain during ww2
@@AFGuidesHD insert "he's out of line, but he's right" meme here
The modern left will interpret any chance of allowing the Wehrmacht to either succeed in battle or show any semblance of humanity as being "on the wrong side of history"...... even though it could very well have been one of the many historical battles which they won (like Crete, Market Garden, Kasserine Pass, Norwegian Campaign, etc) LOL.
SuS
I don't know why you would want to play as a soldier of the Third Reich even they didn't want to be there
I feel like this game incompassed almost everything of the Western zeitgeist. Civil War, Pinkertons, corrupt lawmen, bandit posses, Apache, Navajo, the exotic Mexico, mining corporations, the archetypal cowboy, the archetypal vigilante... you name it!
@@bernard8793 Well, I did write _almost..._
@@bernard8793 Did you miss the first sentence? I think you need to rethink yours..
@@Allegiancy Did i trigger you?
@@bernard8793 Nope but you were clearly triggered by him 🤣
@@bernard8793 The Union didn't ban slavery until later in the war lmao check yourself.
Feels like a cod mission, but in the civil war.
I wonder why they never made something like this
Civil war is a touchy subject. It'd be hard to do without pissing off a lot of people
@@naverilllang they already pissed off some countries tho
Because there would be like 5 gums
Because they’re woke now.
they kind of did with the history channel games but you have to sacrifice so much historical accuracy to make these kinda of games fun, that you might as well just make your own steampunk war instead and avoid the controversy.
So this game has a pair of Confederate main characters?
Ballsy move, whoever made this game. They should have made more of this kind of game
This game is over 14 years old.. that's why.. people didn't care so much about this stuff back then
Wild west themed things seemed to use alot of former confederates as main characters weather as the main protagonist or some side antagonists.
It was developed by Techland (same guys who developed Dying Light and Dead Island)
Why, so we can have more pro slavery losers as heroes in media?
@@jordanschoenenberger4397 so you call people who die on the war "loser"
This game aged much better than I thought it would
The background trumpets create a huge core memory in my brain. Sometimes I catch myself humming it.
The Civil War is a game thats barely touched on by AAA video games, I'd like to see that expanded upon. Maybe someone would make an alternate history game where the Confederacy held out and the Union signed a white peace with them, thus allowing to CSA to exist into the 1900's (until either of the world wars, where I feel like the USA and the CSA would use the chaos in Europe as an excuse to declare war on one another)
Lmao sorry, I meant "The Civil War is a war". My bad. I would edit my comment but I don't want to lose the Heart 😭
Are you familiar with timeline 191?
Great Harry Turtledove reference
@@mcwildstyle9106 thanks lol, id love to see some of his books get turned into games
There was a planned HBO series about that, but snowflakes cancelled it
this game was cool, although a bit simple and repetitive, the story and voice acting was very good. There is so much potential for development, I really hope they bring these sorts of historical games back.
"Historical" hahahahaha
@@Omertahun I can name games that broke the historical value.
Call of duty vanguard
Battlefield 5
Red dead redemption 2
If there’s ever a civil war game:
1. The brutality has to be there. Remember getting shot with a 55 cal mini ball is going to rip you and your horse apart.
2. Slavery can’t be wishy washed like it is here. McCalls have an industrial plantation with its own river docks. It’s not a family farm.
3. Historical accuracy should be the spotlight over gameplay like the OG CoD and MoH games. They should cover all “4” theaters. Far West out in Texas, mid west ie shilo, East - Gettysburg, and the oceanic theatre with iron clads.
Civil war would be so fun to explore through a games medium. There was so many innovations, battle trains, proto battleships, railroad cannons, repeating weapons, and Gatling guns albeit in the final days of the war, submarines, and the first every tank. That’s right in the siege of Richmond the CSA unveiled a prototype for a steam powered “tent” like tank that could be delivered on by train tracks or self propelled. Like that would be the dopest ending to a civil war game. Playing as USCT in Richmond and bamb off loads a fucking tank from a rail road.
When southern soldiers donned their uniforms, "I'm doing this for slavery" would have been the LEAST thing on their minds. The interpretation of the southern cause is a total lie from the mainstream media narrative.
@Edgelord Priestess Of Waifustan, came here to say this. The north had slaves too and were just as racist as the south. Lincoln waged a war without congressional approval to keep the economic and territorial interests of the south under federal control. The fact that people actually think that every time union soldiers dawned their blue outfits they thought to themselves "im doing this to free black people" is laughable. So much history has been falsified
not about slavery cry harder
@@edgelordpriestessofwaifust6434 States rights to what?
@@smokingcrab2290 The North had effectively abolished slavery by 1805, it most certainly did not have any by the time of the American Civil War. As far as Lincoln was concerned this was the suppression of a rebellion which endangered the integrity of the United States, and seeing how the rest of the government actively increased the strength of the Army and Navy along with suspending habeas corpus It's fair to say they were willing to work with Lincoln on this. I highly doubt there are people who genuinely think every man in the Union military put their life on the line to free slaves or every Confederate to defend the practice. What is obvious is that the actions of both sides ultimately furthered their respective goals. The actions of the Union led to their victory and the subsequent end to slavery where the South sought to preserve it and ultimately lost.
"I'm here to defend States' Rights and pregnant Anne Frank."
-Private AFGuidesHD, 420th Georgia, Company A, June 12, 1864
I'm here to defend the innocent and protect those who can't protect themselves ;)
I know the exact image you're referencing.
I wish there was a game about the civil war like this
yeah this would have been good if it was all civil war
sadly techland's generic zombie games sell about 20x more games than juarez did lol
Can't wait for activision's take on the civil war
Those colt army with apache foregrip and red dot sight will be meta since day one
They tried...
Me and my cousin played this game for hours some of the best times
I mean, kinda hard to take a neutral stance on the Civil War. There was very clearly a wrong side and you can’t just side-step the whole slavery thing. It was kinda a big deal at the time.
I played all the Call of Juarez games and liked them all, each game has a unique gameplay.
3:21 "Sir, yes, Sir! We are the main characters!"
All Confederates using Repeating rifles & cartridge firing revolvers, uhhhhh no.
@colin plocinski Also the uniforms are quite wrong: Confederates didn't used shoulder rank insigna, it was only used in the Union uniforms, and for officiers.. Officers in the south used collars rank insignas (1 bar for 2nd Lieutenants, 2 for 1st Lieutenants, 3 for Captains, 1 star for Majors, 2 for Lieutenant-Colonels, 3 for Colonels..) and both camps used large rank insignas on the arms for Corporals, Sargents etc.. (much like in WW2, but with insignas pointing downwards instead of upwards) ;)
Not just reaping rifle somehow they where able to get 1866 Winchester in 1864
go read a history book, it seems you will have more fun that way
@@jamesritter1113 Well.. "artistic license - history". Akin to how Call of Duty Black Ops gets 1977 Steyr AUG Austrian bullpup assault rifle for a game that is set on 1968-1969. They took liberty in history accuracy just to make the game fun.
@colin plocinski the henry rifle that had to be loaded at the top of the magazine tube the side loading gat was not invented yet
Everyone loves talking about being anti-fed, but as soon as you say the confederacy, they roam at the mouth and lash out.
Because the Gettysburg Address is the biggest propaganda coup in history, people say "propaganda like Goebbels" but really they should say "propaganda like Lincoln".
A confederacy isn't unique to America, it's basically a stronger form of alliance and mutual interest with states.
It's just that people, thanks to Lincoln's propaganda, like to link slavery to any ideal of a Confederacy of states that decentralizes power.
@@AFGuidesHD America intially was a true confederacy which failed to function since the states would not support the legislation and requests of the federal government on basic things such as paying off the nation's debts and making good on taxes, hence why America became more centralized as time went on. What Hood referred to explicitly as "The Confederacy" refers to the 1861 Confederate States of America which was a traitorous movement and remains as such because Lincoln was correct. The documented and proven reason for the Confederates States of America's attempted succession was to preserve the institution of slavery, not to form a book-definition confederacy as the structure remained as centralized as its northern counterpart in comparison.
There was no "propaganda" when the C.S.A. was, by definition, an insurrection led by the wealthy to secure the right to enslave of African Americans, as was their method of industry over widescale mechanization like in the North. The C.S.A. was nothing but a legion of traitors who we hold no heritage to, no more no less.
@@BDubH22 Yes and George Washington and his supporters were traitors and nothing more than rebels.
Difference is the British Empire didn't make a big thing about slavery despite banning it a mere 20 years later (and about 60 before Lincoln thought anything about it).
"There was no "propaganda""
There was because there is documented and proven reason that Lincoln didn't care about slavery until the southern states refused to re-join the Union and rejected proposals that would have seen slavery protected.
@@AFGuidesHD George Washington held a commission in the British military, he betrayed the British Empire and gave up all he knew to form a new government that safeguarded the rights of the individual, in a highly paraphrased statement. Much more noble than rebelling against the government because Lincoln planned on phasing out slavery (Thus making cotton and other crops much less profitable to produce) in my own opinion.
Lincoln initially wanted to completely ban the institution of slavery but withheld on such action as to appease the C.S.A. It was convenient then that, with the war dragging on and morale dropping, that he held onto his true intentions to give the Gettysburg Address to hone in on the moral purpose of the war. After the address morale was through the roof and the North fought with renewed vigor since "We need to reunite the country!" wasn't enough alone to justify the brutal attrition suffered. It was good political maneuvering, morale is hard to keep high and he held onto a trump card until the time was right. The South would had been compensated over a multi-year plan to phase out slavery with the federal buy-out of current slave contracts. The war was purely over the institution of slavery and the C.S.A. attempting to preserve it.
I'm a Southerner, it's criminal that people in my region hold reverence to traitors. There is no justification or vindication for the actions of the greedy, treasonous, and inhumane.
@@BDubH22 "that safeguarded the rights of the individual"
certain wealthy individuals at least. What do you think about Washington being a slave owner ?
"it's criminal that people in my region hold reverence to traitors"
i'm british and i agree ;)
Red Dead Redemption Civil War DLC looks amazing.
I used to play this game when I was a child
If I didn't know any better I would have thought this was an alternate history game
why?
@@AFGuidesHD from how modern it looks and the sudden pause in time to shoot each Yankee I had fallout trauma in these parts
I still play the history channel civil war game from 06 every blue moon. Pretty fun to me. Not the best but not trash either imo. Worth pulling out the 360 for 😂
😆 you play custers last stand too right 🤣
This game looks so historically accurate, I can’t wait to see Robert E Lee win the war 😀
Are u being sarcastic
@@lilsaint5087 Yes
That would’ve been glorious indeed
@@adolfgaming1761 bruh
Still more accurate than last CoD. Confederates won some minor battles actually...
a video game made in 2009? holy shit this gameplay is impressive everything about this game is amazing, the graphics and the ragdolls
This is like rdr2 but in my opinion better
"Got a light?"
-William T. Sherman, probably
"You got more Booze?"
-General Grant
"I surrender Yankee"
-Every Confederate soldier in 1865.
"Which enraged his father to punished him severely"
- Oversimplified, probably
@@TheLAGopher “Go ahead honey, I don’t mind being a cuck”
-blkyank1
@@HMSHOOD1920 Don't make me get the Bismarck
Everybody had repeater rifles back then 😂
I mean they kinda had to do that so the gameplay wasn’t boring as hell.
Yes that’s how the confederates won the war 😂
Not to mention cartridge revolvers…
@@SteelHex Automatic Cannons
@@adolfgaming1761 strangely enough the Gatling gun did exist during the civil war, but only a handful of them were used by the Union. But, it doesn’t look like that thing in the game. It wasn’t automatic, it was manually cranked.
"Damn bro, they fought so well! No way they'll lose Atlanta!"
"Even if they do lose, I bet the capture of Atlanta would be treated like any other city's capture and involve no controversial events!"
Oh no what happened after this battle?
@@futurei0oo oh
@@MoldycheeseJr Well they made nice movie in 1939 😆
man i love this game
I love playing this and finish the game
@@sunney4252 yeah i to play this game yes i now i did not play this and i fucking need to 🤣🤣
Finally, playing with the good guys.
You mean losers.
i got addicted to this game back in 2009
i’ve played this game at least 10 times through. it was my favorite game growing up
This is one of my favorite games that I played ❤️
The War of Northern Aggression
More like Second American Revolutionary War or American Confederate War of Independence.
The War of [Country] Aggression seems overtly cringe.
@@AFGuidesHD that's what we called it when I was in school
@@thealaskanseparatist6786 what did you call it ?
@@AFGuidesHD The War of Northern Aggression
North remembers!
I wish there was a battlefield Civil War kind of game
@colin plocinski Yeah like how Dice made BF1 which WW1 games are barely made. Maybe theyll do a civil war game
Well since EA hired new DICE developers which are mostly left people, they will most likely take everything out like slaves or just in general make the game for kids sorta like 2042
@@diego_z90 Sadly yes they will
This would be the perfect game for an split screen.. what an chance they lost.
There needs to be a call of duty about the American civil war that would be sick
And the confederates would be black women
don't forget the anime skins
Yeah and they'll have 1870s repeating Henry rifles even though its 1863....
For those saying there should be more AAA Civil War games check out War of Rights!
Some people missing out big time on a game called War of Rights, for the PC only but best civil war game out there rn.
Uhmmm, dynamite in 1864?! It would be patented in 1867 in England. What they used during the Civil War was powder, it took almost 4 metric tonnes of powder to make that great boom during the Battle of the Crater.
Lol, the latest Call of Duty allows you to use STG 44's in 1941. Also off by three years.
Guys form ''Darkest of Days'' left some dynamite in 1862 😅
this is better than I have expected
I remember playing this game long long ago on my old computer
First ever shooter game i played
I remember this game and I kept on yelling "COME AT ME YOU YANKEE SONS OF BITCHES!." just laughing my ass of while killing every federal who came.... It was glorious
holy based
😂
Imagine being this salty for something that you never experienced…
@Japanese Army soldier How am I salty for stating an observation?
@Japanese Army soldier So am I. So leave me alone, right?
incoming 14 years old General Sherman cringe lords
Still mad about your ancestors' defeat
@@degamispoudegamis actually it’s the way this country turned out
@@mrmackey8776 yah i hope it ceases existing, it doesn't deserve to anyway
@@degamispoudegamis it will when the sh*tskins take over
I bet those soldiers wished they had level actions in real life - but by far the most common weapon on both sides were rifled percussion lock muskets
I can see why they wouldn't make you use one of those in a game like this though
@@SStupendous
yeah, but what's that number compared to the north of 2 million soldiers that participated in the war? (also that vast majority of that number were on the union side)
@@SStupendous Not high enough that I would expect to see an *entire* random nondescript company of soldiers using them
One thing I find interesting about this is that the narration calls the battle of Sharpsburg Antietam, to the South it was called the Battle of Sharpsburg not Antietam creek.
I guess its because the CSA lost and that Antietam is more widely known.
Its like anything in history in modern media.
Imagine calling "Stalingrad" the "Battle of the Volga". People wouldn't know what you're talking about.
I find it hilarious in the beginning of the video he says they defend the family "farm." Lmfao They didn't wanna use the word plantation when your playing as the southerners 🤣
do modern americans call their farms "plantations" ?
i don't think many do
You're actually playing as a Confederate? Is that even allowed?
Bound in Blood is so fucking good.
F around and find out, Johnny Reb
"That's a nice city you've got there...shame if something were to happen to it"
General FUCKING Sherman
Jefferson Davis: Don't worry, Lee's counterattack will throw back the Yankees
Confederate Officer: Mr. President... Lee...
Lee surrendered the Army of Northern Virginia. There aren't enough men for the counterattack.
@@AFGuidesHD Davis: luckily we have dr. Loveless! His new explosive... 💥
I loved this game back in the day
I’m getting massive red dead redemption vibes
Man this Character curses like Arthur would of he signed up...
Ah!
An 1860s FPS!!
Awesome!
I didn’t know it existed
This is almost like red dead redemption
For the Confederacy
Bruh
@@matteobrandi7541 what
@@silverpawsiblings Glory Glory Hallelujah
McCall's fighting for Korwin-Mikke 🤣en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confederation_Liberty_and_Independence
110000 percent more accurate than Cod vanguard by far
Just played this 2 weeks ago and this pops up... 😩
Is that a magical self loading cannon? Who the hell is loading the rounds?
I love this game old game i never bored to play
The uniforms are wrong. The flags are wrong. The way they reload black powder revolvers is wrong. But besides those things this looks like it could be a good game.
yes its an arcade game not a simulator
Yep. Surely the Americans will make a more thorough and historical accurate game about the ''January Uprising''.
Miss playing that when I was younger
One of the best games I've ever played.
Frank Underwood would have loved this game
A bound in blood video in 2022? Alright.
Wars that could be used to be make a good COD game
The Civil War
Franco-Prussian War
World War I
Napoleonic Wars
Seven Years War
American Revolution
Mexican-American War
Etc. I could go on & on guys. Yet companies are milking WW2 drier than a camels asshole
Civil war in...Spain?
Isn't the muskets of that time suppose to take A LOT of minutes to reload?
A good soldier could fire 3 rounds a minute
They’re using a Winchester repeater that was developed after the war. The closest thing to whats in the game is a Henry repeater which looks drastically different.
@@waffins7057 Yeah, that’s what I said. They didn’t have trapdoor rifles. Those were after the war.
@@SStupendous No. The receivers are very different, Henry receiver it longer. It’s method of loading is drastically different. Henry is much longer. The way it ejects spent casings is different.
No mention of his slaves or how he was fighting to keep them slaves?
yeah no mention of James Buchanan violating the constitution or anything either.
Did you expect Ray to be like "KILL THEM YANKEES THEY'RE TRYING TO LIBERATE OPPRESSED PERSONS OF COLOR?"
People were much simpler back in those times.
Great game it reminds me about fun in play of games
There should be a civil war battlefield game
There is, it's for computer. Called War of Rights. Sadly console plebs can't play!
@@cadeallan7139 I seen it but I mean battlefield should actually dedicate time into a realistic civil war battlefield. Like that's mainly where the war took place was fields lol. And it'd be nice to not get carpet bombed by an aircraft or helicopter mged every second. I wanna defend something and have someone try to get in my face to win. Not get sweeped up from a one click button method.
@@michaelmain6319 If you've seen it, you know it's a game battlefield wouldn't have any business being in. Have you seen the historical accuracy of their games? It's horrendous. War of Rights actually provides a realistic experience and is historically accurate in 99% of it's content. Accurate battlefields, accurate uniforms, accurate weapons, etc. We all know EA could never make a game like that, simply because it would never sell.
@@cadeallan7139 I have seen the game, and I love it. But even with historical inaccuracy I think battlefield could make a really good civil war game. Based of the larger player and map scales. I really don't get why players get angry with historical accuracy, you can't make a widely played game with historical accuracy. I'm sorry you just don't especially if it's only on one Console/PC.
No they would mess it up like 2042. You see EA has hired new DICE devs that are the biggest snowflakes on the planet. They would make a civil hero shooter game
American civil war (1861-1865)🇺🇸
IF COD and RDR2 had a baby.
We need a remake of this game or better a sequel tecland que ho made this is working actually maybe in a future we can have another call of Juarez
Atlanta doesn’t have hills and mountains like what’s pictured in this game
well this particular part of the battle is set somewhere on the chattahoochee river 55 miles south west of Atlanta city center
Bro I was just thinking about this game
This game just reminds of cod world at war
Alternate universe movie Gone of the Wind in the video game: Sherman Gone with the Wind, Go with the wind to aftermath
Nice
Shame you didn't use Realism mod, gives guns thier actual names, reload and rate of fire
Based video game????
Reminds me of Darkest of Days
Winchester 😁
If the confederates had a company size of those 2 the south would had won XD
Still look good
Did the Wild West exist during the Civil war?
yes, wild west was period from about 1800-1914
@@AFGuidesHD Just done some research and yup your right. But some parts of it stared in 1607 with the founding of Jamestown and with it’s expansion and golden age between 1865-1890 with most of it falling in 1912 but most of it did’nt fall until the capture of pancho villa in 1920.
ok, trench warfare didn't even exists on Civil War and Colt Single Action army was developed until 1873, 8 years later after the end of the war
trench warfare did exist in the "civil war"
Why is he holding it gangster style
Bruh how do they have Winchester rifles?
this dude was probably ramirez great grandfather
RDR mixed with COD
I only ever played this game because my family bought it for me. And why did they buy it? because it has our last name in the title.
Nostalgia AF
Why does this look and sound like CoD WaW
Television-visual arts
I find it funny they are using Henry Rifles but use them as if they are muskets. Also pretty sure they hardly even used Henrys.
lol, they really take some parts from call of duty, but sure it does look cool and comical. Since, COD never makes the American civil war
Much better game I just played it 13days ago and it's masterpiece!!!
i wonder if my 4th grade teacher would see this video :i
The weapons is not accurate, in the real history the lever action in civil war is henry and it’s rare gun