Following the outbreak of the war in Gaza, TH-cam updated its community guidelines, and as a result, the previous version of this video was age-restricted a day after we released it. We decided to edit and upload a less graphic version in the hopes that an unrestricted video will be viewed and shared by the widest possible audience. Please continue to share your comments and thanks for your support!
@@practice4523 23, You may wish to first look-up the definition of the word apartheid and then, go sit with an Israeli Arab in Jerusalem's Arab quarter and ask him what he thinks of your version of apartheid.
@@AccordionandViolinlife Thank you. If by now you don't know how the algorythm favors you and censors us, then you have no clue about the degree of powerful support you enjoy.
The unholy alliance between the terrorist Islamists and the left-leaning ignorant folks chanting things they don't understand and do not want to understand is really mind-boggling. I already see comments here saying that "stop arguing about semantics". It is too late for the brainwashed Islamism-sympathizing leftists.
@@smithiscoming they even rejected the term "palestinian" as a zionist label. until the founding of the PLO the arabs in the region considerd themselves southern syrians
@@smithiscomingyes really. 1st time in history a nation of pstine was claimed in wb/aza was 1968. Year AFTER Yiz liberated them from jordan and egyot respectively.
@useyourdelusion6807 Well... Most Arabs in the 1930s and 1940s were transient migrants who came for British jobs. British landownership records show Arabs living in the area owned only 3.3% of the land allotted to Israel by the UN. The grandparents of Palestinians squatted or rented.
Nonsense, this is not about Arabs, this is about Arabs and Africans who call themselves Palestinian who live in N.E. Africa. You are being disingenuous by including all Arabs. There are Arabs in Yemen, Iraq, Jordan etc, do you mean them too ? Golda Meir called herself a Palestinian, Ariel Sharon was born in 1928 with a Palestinian birth certificate. You people need to stop reading books form middle, and start from the beginning, intelligent people do that.
Omgggggg you need to be educated. Is it hamas who was given refuge by palestinians when they were being killed and being kicked out of every country ????? No Palestinians gave refuge to JEWS who illegally took over palestine taking advantage of poor Palestinians. Ok so brutally murdering infants and women is ok???? Raping them is ok ??? Oh I forgot Israel is just defending its people ohhhhh.
@@esther7867 look up black September 1970. When Arab countries in the region accepted Palestinian "refugees" they tried to overthrow their government and take over.
Chanting slogans like "From the River to the Sea" and "Globalize the Intifada" without knowing what it means and what it can imply to different people is just irresponsible. Educate yourselves, kids. Stop repeating slogans you really don't understand.
@@Bengalinationalistthe Canaanite people disappeared from the historical record approximately 2500 years ago. But hey, today’s self identified Palestinians - the majority of whom are descendants of 19th/20th century immigrants from surrounding countries - will claim any ancestry to try to solidify their ahistorical claims. Do, first they claim to be canaanites, then philistines. And did you know Jesus was a Palestinian? Repeat lies often enough and they are accepted as truth, as Goebbels taught.
@@tomasandersson2182 relearn yours, because it did. The romans got pissed and renamed this place. You could argue that beforehand it was israel, but then theres no end to this thing. One could argue this should be canaan, but the thing that matters is not who existed back in the day, or who originally was here. It is who's already here. And currently, there are both israelis and palestinians. They're here, and you can't ignore it.
If the world really believes in truth, justice, they read the actions of bothe Palestinians and Israelites 🇮🇱. One group longs to wipe out the other for long time even sending their own kids to die. whereas other group defended, has built a nation beautiful and has become super power in 70 years. Also many different religious people are living peacefully within it's boundaries. Judge for yourself and stand with justice
"History is very clear about what happens when you smash together a bunch of hostile populations into one country and tell them to play nice." I think most of us can agree that the British made a colossal mess of things. At any rate, both the Israelis and the Palestinians are here to stay. Somehow, a way to live in peace must be found.
For that racist settlers and the majority of "Palestineans" have to be pretty much "reeducated". I don't mean that in the way of "reeducation" camps, I mean that by transforming the educational system. Right now Israel can't change the "Palestinean" system, but they can adjust their own. With that I mean that there should be less of a split between Arab Israelis and everyone else, there should be mainly mixed schools. Maybe excluding the Druze. Another point is that all the dirty parts of Israeli history should not be neglected. The ugly truths should always be taught. Of course I don't ask for an anti-Israel curriculum, but for example Jewish terrorism prior to the founding of Israel and in general the conflicts should be explored. I can't say how they could fix the "Palestinean" system. Maybe funding and helping "Palestineans" who promote peace and dialogue could help. The best way would be to integrate them into the Israeli education system though. But that would be _very_ hard to pull off, considering many "Palestineans" get taught to hate pretty much as soon as they can grasp this concept. And it would require international support instead of mindless promotion of Palestinean statehood. A huge problem is also Islam. It either needs to be dropped (preferable, but next to impossible), or they need to be taught the "cafeteria" version, which ignores all the hatred and oppression of Jews mentioned in Islamic texts. The divide is harder than ever, but there is a way towards peace. And while it is not a quick solution, taking steps now could both strengthen Israel, especially the connection between Arab Israelis and Jews, and be a step onto a path towards peace, not just survival.
@@ThePandafriend "racist settlers" oh you mean the biggest slavers in history who castrated millions of "abeeds" for milleniums? you mean Muhhamed Rida who claimed that "selling land to jews is a sin" and thus starting the war? you mean the arabs who attacked the semitic canaanites and stole their lands? the people who still trade the most amount of "bacha bazi"?
شكراً يا حابيتي!! Agree so much, Israel is the best country in the Middle East and such a great home. May we (all Israelies) finally get to live here peacefully 🙏🙏
That’s true. The original 1964 PLO charter even renounced claim to Gaza which was ruled by Egypt, and the West Bank which was ruled by Jordan. The creation of a Palestinian Arab identity was to destroy Israel and then an attempt at pan-Arabism
There was no Israel before 1948, and the whole Jewish nation was created after a promise by UK, a colonial power that occupied the land. This was one colonizer handing the land to another colonizer, and even if no national identity as Palestinian existed for the local population, no body has the right to force them off their land where they have lived for centuries.
@@MbekAla The Jews were slaughtered by the Romans and exiled. They never forget their ancient homeland. Even in exile at Passover they say ‘ next year in Jerusalem’. King David made Jerusalem Israel’s capital 3000 years ago. There has never been a Palestine. It is a British colonial creation. Several hundred years ago, a Dutch explorer explored the Holy Land. The villages all had Hebrew, Greek, or Latin names - nine Arab in origin. Can you even name one Arab village there from 2000 years ago ? Archaeology is filled with evidence of Jewish existence there. And yes, Jesus has even used the word Israel
@@MbekAla Actually, the Jewish nation was re-created after a promise by UK (Balfour Declaration). And who were the colonizers after the Romans? The muslim Arabs and then the muslim Turks until 1920, after many many CENTURIES without even a 'Palestinian' living there but Jewish and Christian settlers. The English were there not even 30 years.
@@edus9636 So you are telling me that you are getting back the land after it was conquered by Romans, muslim arabs and Turks? , let me tell you that you are leaving behind a big chunk of land since parts of Egypt, Lebanon, Jordan and Iraq were all under the jewish kingdom in the past. And according to the Taurah at least jews were not the first residents of that region but they were chosen by god to live there, so people existed in that area before jews. With your logic, the whole map of the world would need to be recreated and Roman/Persian Empire would reconquer the entire world.
When we ask them which river and which sea, and they can’t answer those same people will try to deflect or get angry. We are showing them they know nothing and are just obsessed. I find those are so angry and hate-filled.
@@ivanj.conway9919 You do all, Don't run away. You hate when Palestinians say from the river to the sea don't be hypocrites. Palestinians don't say Greater Israel nor do they wanna conquer the world as your Zionist ideology. You wanted to wipe out Palestinian Christians and Muslims so you came up with this Oct 7 thing like you've been doing since 1948.
Now show the video on the persecution of Jews and Christians in the 1000 years that Islam conquered the area. Where did the large Jewish and Christian communities in the Arab countries go?
Yep, we have videos about a lot of that: What Happened to Mizrachi Jews of Arab Countries? th-cam.com/video/Y4NjZBD9fW4/w-d-xo.html What Happened to Iraq's Jews? th-cam.com/video/DnXSOQqzaKA/w-d-xo.html The Rise and Fall of Jews in the Ottoman Empire: th-cam.com/video/UMFYBNMR3pg/w-d-xo.html Let us know if you'd like more recommendations!
It's not greed...it's' radical Islamic fundamentalism that is keeping this region in turmoil. These Muslims are still living like it's the 8th Century.
@@hello6437 "uprising" like the communists against the starving farmers "antifa" that uses quotes from Mein Kampf "resistance" that enslaves their own people for pleasure, like "bacha bazi"
Mossab Hassan Youssef said that Palestine only existed less than 30 years, in the Mandate period. Fully agree with him and almost everything else he says!!
There's no name of a lybia in history yet it's exist right now. We can't claim anything on the name of 4000 years of history. And if we then Europeans hasn't right to live on north American Oceanian and south american continent because it's not belongs to them according Bible and history
@@abbotsful kingdom of israel/Judea/Land of Canaan existed for a few centuries before the arabs and romans attacked. it then was occupied, taken back by the semitic canaanites and eventually lost to romans who renamed it to "syria philistina" by Hadrian
Hey, NY mom: IT’S NOT “the Jordanian River”. It’s the River Jordan. Rivers OFTEN form or denote INTERNATIONAL BOUNDARIES, & that’s true here. “Administrative Control” is USUALLY SHARED JOINTLY by Both or All parties affected.
@@michaelshapiro1543 ok, whatever you say. I apologize for a spell check error. I am sorry offended thee. But my friend who works for the Jordanian government along with his family has called it that. He’s really not ignorant, and from the actual area. So, I probably am correct that they can be used interchangeably But if that little critique of using the -Ian made you feel smart, then enjoy Either way, they don’t act like they care about actual people or they’d help get them food and collect donations to do so. I am doubtful that beating up a university janitor in NY and making people not be able to get home on the subway has saved 1 life. They are truly ignorant as they told me that Gazans don’t need food, they need awareness. Everyone over a certain age in childhood is aware of this conflict. It’s not Sudan where most people are clueless. As someone who had family and friends in Syria under ISIS, I know that they can get actual life saving supplies to innocent civilians if they actually cared; we did in Syria
@@NYmomAdrienne3915 Well, you're pre-occupied with many issues. Fine. But claiming a river, that serves also as an international boundary, as the property of any ONE country is an error of law & logic, not a "spell check error". Cheers!
Nice effort juggling words not to say the blunt truth and being "cancelled" , the fact that no Arabic nations want to accept any refugees from Gaza already tells the story. Also, Israel has many Arab people living their lives in its territory, but how many Jews live in Gaza, Iran, Lebanon, etc... ? That shows how compassionate those neighbour Arab countries are towards anyone that is not Arab ... or even towards their Arab Gaza neighbours...
Yup. There's a reason population of Jews in most Muslim countries dropped so hard that ethnic cleansing is a term that should be used to describe what happened.
right around 1903 jews started dissapearing. even more started dissapearing once the grand mufti visited germany in 1937, and met the painter in 1941 as the pictures show wonder where they "dissapeared", with trucks heading to Auschwitz.. surely it was supply trucks right?
Every Middle Eastern country that has accepted Palestinian refugees in the past was given ample reason never to do so again, from civil wars to assassinations to siding with the Iraqis when they invaded Kuwait.
It's a very problematic slogan. What about the jews who bought the lands and the ones who farmed in it? Hamas is the one stalling the peace, and who is supported by hamas? Iran, who's ironically also destablizing the whole region
@@ABBCoffical Palestinian oppression: No elections No free speech No civil rights No women's rights No LGBTQ rights State sponsored murder of hamass and fatah by their elected governments. All of this daily oppression is ftom PA and hamass. Bonus round: hamass has morality police to force women's to dress as hamass dictates. Married women need a note to leave their homes. There's your oppression.
@@aaronlol6703 no? Unjustified, unprovoked, systematic oppression started by Britain. This started when they decided they wanted the land and they took it. But no, when they fight back it’s violence.
The big question is why don't the Arab countries help the Palastine people. Egypt, Lebanon and Jordan do not help because they have wlways tried to overthrow there governments.
Before the State of Israel was established. The Arabs chose to live in the lowlands. and neglected the mountains. But Jews who were already living in Israel, and Jews who came from Europe because of the Nazis. They settled in the mountains and in places the Arabs did not want to live. The Arabs saw the success of the Jews. And they started with terror, burned settlements, slaughtered Jews. and did pogroms. It was difficult for the Arabs to see the Jews succeed in places where they did not. Israel was under the control of the British. who ignored the attacks of the Arabs. But they persecuted Jews... and even hanged Jews who hurt the British. In the end the British had to leave Israel... and the rest is history. Slowly the establishment of the State of Israel began. But this still did not stop the Arabs from harming the Jews. Palestine is a definition that the British chose to define on the map an area in the Middle East. When the British left. The state was established. Israel. But suddenly the Arabs realized that they were losing their power. But this was not their country. They were laborers brought by the Turks. How could there be a state of Palestine. What president or prime minister did they have, or what currency did they have...
Man in one of the Montreal protests the speaker was chanting “Palestine arabiye, Palestine will be there.” Blatantly misleading all the non Arab speakers into thinking he’s making a translation.
@@davidshapiro5616 I am very much aware of the Mizrahi. That's why I said the Europeans will go back to Europe. The true Middle Easterners will remain behind. Remember that 500000 Israelis left after Octo 7, so it has already begun. Those who belong will stay, and those who don't will return to where they actually came from
@@practice4523 While there was a dip in migration from Israel with more leaving that coming the tide has now turned the other way. Unfortunately, many that arrive seem to be from the the US with extreme nationalist views following the religious ideology of Rabbi Meir Kahane. I probably don't need to tell you about Rabbi Kahane.
@@davidshapiro5616 I know all about Kahane. My point remains unchanged, the transformation of Israel into anti-democratic repressive state began long before Oct 7. It was cemented by the election of Ben Gvir and Smotrich. Those people are incompatible with the West yet fit perfectly well in the Middle East. Whether or not Hamas loses, the extremists have taken over and will drive out the sane Israelis. If Hamas doesn't destroy Israel, it will either implode or be pariah-ed into oblivion. Either ways Ashkenazim will not stay and find out
If the Arabs of Palestine were truly interested in peaceful coexistence they would have accepted one of the many offers for their own state next to Israel over the past 80 years.
We just don't want jewish state in our Muslim's land. Middle East is for muslims right now. It's not belongs to Jews and Christian if both religion was originated there in history it does not matters and if you impose jewish state and Christianity on Muslim middle East then we know according history history Christianity doesn't belongs to Europe. We impose Islam on Europe. So decide your self you want to impose jewish state on Muslim's middle East or you want a Islamic Europe
So when land is unused by its original people, European settlers could come and take it ? I think that sounds a bit like what colonialism is O_O Europeans did not believe Africans were using the continent properly, came might white man to properly use the resources and claim the land for their own.
@@MbekAla The Jews made the desert flourish. Look at the Saudis: still surrounded by sand, although they have more than enough money to green their whole country. But extravagant palaces, expensive private orgies, mega yachts, training of terrorists and building thousands of mosques and "cultural centers" worldwide are more important. The result of marrying their cousins for 1400 years...
"many students walked back after realizing their mistake" is that a fact? i wish it was, but those students dont seem to be going away, even after learning taht they are standing in support of terrorism and genocide. if they had the mental capacity to actually learn and be inquisitive they would be on the side of israel..
Resistance is not terrorism and only the blind will not see that a genocide is going on. These students have the mental capacity to learn and be inquisitive and with the correct knowledge acquired they are not standing on the side of Israel.
The ignorance and hypocrisy of these demonstrators runs deep knowing nothing about a conflict even less about the history of the region yet to think you got it figured out how we should live is astounding,would they live peacefully in the same country with someone who says they want you dead and gone any way possible?
Three times.. Three times the Palestinians were given the opportunity for their own state and to live alongside Israel in peace - but chose violence. 1. UN Partition Plan (1947) 2. Camp David Summit (2000) 3. Annapolis Conference (2007) And another time when Israel disengaged from the Gaza strip in 2005, when Gaza’s people democratically chose Hamas - a terror organization to rule, and by that - doomed them to be so called “refugees” forever, while Israeli people chose peace and prosperity over and over again. That's the only thing I was missing in the video. Other than that, great video.
I refuse to believe people will choose the harm of another people when offered freedom from their injury, starvation and death of their people. Because the outcome of that thought are that entire people should be ruled by another people like dictators, a regime that leads to greater amounts of suffering than any other type of system. Jews and Black people had become beholden to the will of white Gentiles for white Gentiles to enact their barbarous atrocities. Palestinians are beholden to the will of Israeli people because of this mindset.
No... because it doesn't call to REPLACE anyone that's already between that river and that sea. Just calls for Eretz Yisrael to remain in existence. See the difference?
No one I know says that so it's a moot question. Greater Israel proponents are just as crazy and dangerous as Greater Palestine ones. Two states, two people, the only viable solution. We're just not ready for it now.
@@Nom1fan this can be applied to both chants, logically you cannot say this is different than the other when it uses the same words. However, there is a difference, Israel is already free and individuals are living under civil law. While, many palestinians live under military israeli law. Making israel rule over what the other state is able to conduct or not conduct, this means FREEING people. Being free means being able to study, work, move freely, like all others are.
@@krinzey3090 No palestinians live under Israeli military law. That is a propagandist lie. Gaza is completely self governed. The only intervention Israel has is due to terrorism. In both West Bank and Gaza there is a sea of endless terrorism from land, underground, and sea. A bit from the air too. If you call any nation defending its border from terrorism "controlling under military law" it is impossible to defend borders. Palestinians have their own zoos, hotels, universities, restaurants and anything else they wish to have. As long as it's not terror Israel doesn't get involved in any of that. This is easy google maps search away for any to see, including pictures and videos. Please stop spreading lies and propaganda and stop supporting horrible terrorists.
@@krinzey3090 is palestine currently from the river to the sea? no. israel is, so it means for israel to remain. does israel currently rule the palestinians? also no
Thank you for using the correct map of Israel throughout this video, since it's so rare to see it used - an Israel that includes the Golan Heights but does not include Gaza or the West Bank. Also, I would add that if the slogan is truly a call for freedom for all people living in Israel/Palestine, it would be "From the river to the sea Israel AND Palestine will be free". It's simply inaccurate to say that "both sides use the slogan", when in Israel it's a minority opinion of the far right parties and in the Pro-Palestinian circles it's the most prevalent slogan out there. If you're not you jewish you might want to try to understand why we would assume the worst when hearing this. We have a certain history. And you will never hear any slogan even remotely similar to this one at a pro-Israel demonstration.
It is impossible to free a land by removing another ethnic group which also resides on that land. It did not work in Rwanda, and it cannot work anywhere.
I would recommend looking for what Israeli far right (ruling party now) say about two state solution, you will see that not only Palestinians are the obstacle here. Some Israelis are even calling for building settlements in Gaza
"never" is a strong word, there's peace today between Japan and the West, and Germany and everyone else. But a direction change will definitely need to happen.
It's pretty obvious that the majority of student's do understand the chant, and really it's pretty obvious what it means too. How can you say that they don't know what they're protesting for when they have actively chosen to put themselves at risk for it...
Language enthusiast here. I'm pretty sure that the river in question is the Jordan, and the sea is the Mediterranean. Stop me right now if I'm wrong, otherwise, please indulge me in a detour. I like to see languages thrive, and I'm always enthusiastic to see moribund language groups pull themselves out of a hole -- one usually inflicted by hostile enemies in pursuit of territory. I root for Irish, Navajo, Cherokee, Nahuatl, Guarani, and the countless other languages that define ethnic groups even more than their creation myths and whatnot. In my own country of America, there was a popular expression that said "The only good Indian is a dead Indian". At some time in history, the perpetrators of that idea began to notice that it wasn't very nice -- "unchristian", you could say. So they changed the phrase to "Save the boy, kill the Indian." Not much better, IMHO. Even though most of the original Americans are now Christian speakers of European languages, they still live at a clear social and economic disadvantage. Are we, as modern Americans, willing to say that we must be Euro-Christian "From sea to shining sea"? Is there NO room for ANYBODY ELSE, even if they were here a long time ago? Now, right before I return to the topic at hand, let's put this in the back of our minds: Anglophones have always had an affinity for one another, more or less. However, people in The US, Canada, Australia, New Zealand or other part-English speaking places like South Africa, India and Nigeria never call ourselves English, or "Englishmen". We acknowledge our kinship with Britain and its offspring, but we don't call ourselves a group -- except "Anglophones." Arabic speakers, on the other hand, DO indeed call themselves Arabs, regardless of their genetic makeup or what state issues their passport. I remember Nasser's call for pan-Arabism. It didn't come to pass, but the concept IS a thing, and there IS an affinity between, for example, Algerians and Iraqis -- of a different sort than exists between Americans and Scots -- neither of whom is "English". That special affinity comes up often. (There's even an extended affinity with non-Arab coreligionists, but we'll skip that for now.) So, let's get back to "The river to the sea". Arabic culture already exists from the Atlantic ocean (Mauritania and Morocco) to the border of Iran. While there are normal linguistic differences over a three-thousand mile span, there's an "official" Arabic dialect (based on classical language) that is mutually intelligible over the whole swath of land.* It's pretty clear that the byword a long time ago was "The only good non-Muslim is a dead non-Muslim." Maybe the conquerors, a bit apprehensive about participating in genocide, chose to relax things and say "Well, if you recognize God as Abraham did, then you can still live here -- as long as you pay a special infidel tax." I suppose there was redlining too. So everybody from the old school is gone. Nobody in Egypt speaks Coptic, except a few Christians in church -- and even they're on the way out just as surely as Jews were pushed out. ALAS, there's a fly in the ointment. Those pesky Hebrews on the eastern shore of the Mediterranean keep inviting their coreligionists in diaspora to come back! WHAT A HORROR. There's no place for THOSE PEOPLE -- ANYWHERE FROM MOROCCO TO PERSIA, or South Asia, or Xingang, or the 'stans. NO PLACE WHATSOEVER. REMOVE THEM! This is a matter of religion, specifically supernatural religion, even more specifically among frightened people in parochial and provincial places who depend on the approval of neighbors as much as they depend on air and water. To say it's not a matter of religion is like saying the American Civil War wasn't about slavery. So there you go. Depending on the scope you choose, you can make any group a majority or a minority. (After all, pale Caucasian people form a minority in the world, but in America we call them the majority.) You can call the Arabs of Palestine "an oppressed minority" if you have severe myopia, but the Jews of the area are the real minority. Unlike Kurds, Yazidis, Roma, and other stateless people, Jews DID have a state that got put out of business about 2000 years ago. They returned and rebuilt the language. The basic laws and customs had been kept largely intact, even in diaspora. They integrated skills they had learned elsewhere and put it all to good use. But those small-time, small-town gossips of Arab Palestine can't stand them. (Although Israeli Arabs might see things differently.) So, if you think about the phrase "river to sea", and expand your view a little, you get to see how stupid a sampling it is. If all you see of a hand is the fingernail, you won't get a very good picture of the whole thing. Finally (at last), let me continue to wear out my welcome with this parting thought on language, this time regarding the word "genocide". There are 4 million native Hebrew speakers. There are 350 million native Arabic speakers. If you kill 4 million Hebrew speakers, that's a genocide. The language, thus its people, will be dead. If you kill 4 million native Arabic speakers, -- no let's make that 40 million, or 1/2 the population of Egypt -- you'll only have 300 million left. That would be a disaster and a crime, but not a genocide. So please, people, open your scope of view and use words that mean something. End of rant. *The history of how that happened is not known to me, but I find it difficult to believe that the indigenous people from Morocco to Egypt deliberately abandoned their languages, cultures and mythologies simply because they were impressed by the Arab businessmen who were expanding their trade routes to Spain. I suspect coercion and violence were involved -- just like in the Americas -- but it was a long time ago, so we can let is slide for now.
As a non Jew in fact I am simply not religious. I am a man who believes extremism is rife globally and the Jewish fight centuries old deserves full support. Thanks for such an insightful summary. You have my thoughts Jewish community
Jews indeed have been facing lots of difficult times in Europe, but isn't it problematic that Europeans threw their failure of accepting the jews as their own citizens at Palestinians who have lost their land ? Isn't a Jew born in Poland same as Christian born in Poland? if so, why would Europeans promise them a land to establish an ethnicity while they all come from various etnicities in Europe ; religion is not an ethnicity, you can find Arab Jews, Black African Jews, European jews ; they share the same religion but they do not share an ethnicity.
no one has a problem with Jewish people having peace, its a problem when they unlawfully colonize the land thats not theirs and deliberately cause instability in the region. Jewish people were living peacefully before the creation of Israel.
@@MbekAla Sounds amazing the fact you just described the holocaust as "their failure of accepting the Jews"....There is no such thing as Arab Jews! With the British conquest, Jews who had been expelled by the Ottomans were able to return after 1917, making your whole paragraph incorrect. A homeland for the Jewish people is an idea rooted in Jewish history, religion, and culture. The Jewish aspiration to return to Zion. No matter where the Jewish community was from, we were wishing to get back to our land .Maybe you should check Ethnoreligious group online.
First you have to understand that in the region of the British and French mandatory occupied land, all the people that were living there were ARABS Jews, Christian, Muslims, Druz, Beduin, Samaritan, Bahis, falahin and travelers. ALL WERE CALLED ARABS, the British mandate, called thier area palestina to differentiate their part from the French mandatory. So if you want to call those ARABS "palastinian" then you have to know palastinian is just a name of a rigen, which includes all the above religions not only Muslims. And therefore it does not indicate nationality, or a Gavernment, or money, or identity, the purpose of the French and British mandate was to devide the land in to individual countries with government in to an independent identity. From 1942 to 1948 this region under the British and French mandatory was divided Farley with setting borders for each country. During those years: the countries that got their independence were; Lebanon 🇱🇧 Syria 🇸🇾 Iraq 🇮🇶 Egypt 🇪🇬 Jordan 🇯🇴 Israel 🇮🇱 and the golf, The ARABS OF So called "palastinian" has a state called Jordan 🇯🇴 since 1946 the British mandate gave the "palastinian" 75% from the land that was occupied by the British mandate. 75% for the "palastinian" who lived in the East Bank of the Jordan River. and 25% for the Jews who lived in Israel west of the Jordan River to the sea. Now they want the 25% of the Jewish state Israel this is the problem. They want to invade and take over the holy land, the promised land, Isreal. Israel ebsorbed all the people who lived in Israel Jews, Christian, Muslims, Druz, Beduin, Samaritan, Bahis, falahin and travelers all were living in this region called "Palestina" for the sake of argument, you can call all the above mentioned "palastinian". The people of Gaza are Egyptians' falahin and travelers. The people of Judia and Samaria are Jordanians' falahin and travelers. The people of Gaza had Egyptions passports and netionality, which was taking away from them by Anwar Sadat and they were thrown away and abandoned. Like an orphan child by their own peoples. The same has happened to the Jordanians in Judia and Samaria who had their passports and netionality taking away from them by King Hussain and they were thrown away and abandoned. Like an orphan child by their own peoples. Egypt 🇪🇬 and Jordan 🇯🇴 needs to take responsibility over their citizens. In the holy land there were living; Jews Christians and Muslims and falahin and Druz and Bedouin and Shomronim, and Bahis and travelers, who integrated in to the Israeli society since the 1948 no one left by force all stayed and lived their life in their own homes. Those who left, they left to join their family in Jordan out of free will, those who left overseas are those who could effort to move and explore opportunities after they sold their land and properties for a heftier price. The Arabs who lives in Israel today are the descendents of the arabs who lived in Israel during the British mandate so were called "Palestain" for 18 years. This claim of being palastinian is the most ridiculous identity that exists in this world. As all of them are arabs falahin and travelers. There never were a palastinian nationality no palastinian money, no palastinian government, no palastinian country. There was the middle east occupied under different empires the latent was the ottoman empire for 401 years collecting taxes from the people who lived in the region. Jews stayed living in the holy land and payed thier taxes. Lots of arabs chose to travel not to own property to avoid paying taxes. During the 401 years of the Ottoman empire and the thousands years before we did not hear about palastinian but we heard about jews and Muslims and Christians and Druz and Bedouin and Shomronim and travelers andfalahin who livedinIsrael theholylandthepromisedland. Then the British and French mandatory occupied the middle east. To deference it from the French mandatory the British called their part Palestine for 18 years. During 1942 and 1948 the middle east Was divided to countries with Gavernment with significance borders with the United Nations agreements. Then , Lebanon 🇱🇧 was born and Syria 🇸🇾, and Jordan 🇯🇴 and Iraq 🇮🇶 and Israel 🇮🇱 and Egypt 🇪🇬 ( though we know that Egypt and Israel were existed before, during Biblical time and during occupation of other empires, the Egyptions and the jews remain on their lands for generations.) THE PEOPLES OF GAZA ARE EGYPTIONS AND THE PEOPLES OF JUDIA AND SAMARIA ARE JORDANIANS. MAY PEACE WILL COME DOWN FROM HEAVEN ON ISRAEL 🇮🇱 AND ALL HUMANITY 🕊🕊🕊🕊🕊🕊
I had family that served in both world wars and I lived next to several veterans. They had to sacrifice so much for peace their innocence there best years there conscience. All they wanted for us in return was for us to think for ourselves to show kindness and live good and peaceful life. It makes me sick seeing ignorant people advocate for violence and genocide. Anti-semitism is disgusting.
Israel captured the Gaza from Egypt and the West Bank from Jordan in the 1967 Six Day War. They both refused to take them back leaving the land and the war refugees to Israel's discretion. The solution is as simple as all other wars in the 20th century, the refugees must be allowed to migrate back to their home nations who have forsaken these lands and their own people.
Actually it's because there was no peace agreement. The Khartoum Resolution in 1967 was "No peace with Israel, No negotiation with Israel, No recognition of Israel" also known as "The Three Noes".
@unpacked Please don't continue using the fake, propaganda term "palestinian". There's never been a palestinian state or people. Palestina (or philistine in arabic) was a region, kinda like saying Middle East, or North America, or New England. I do feel compassion for the arab/jordanian people living in Israel. Their arab brothers have forsaken them and use them as fodder for their jihad and political aspirations.
What you think is irrelevant since they openly declare that it is a call to exterminate Jews, then Christians, then everybody else. Learn what apartheid mean because there is no such thing in Israel, Arabs and Christians have full rights in Israel but not in any Muslim country. And Israel is a country, the only occupation was Egypt in Gaza and Jordan in the West Bank.
…. Facts on palestinian leadership. For all of you out there praising the palestinian authority please note they have been on the wrong side of every issue - During the 1940’s they chose nazis over making peace with the Jews. In 1948 they chose war over recognizing Israel. In 1967 they chose war again and got a humiliating defeat, 1970’s and 80’s they chose IRA terrorists over England and the red army faction over democratic Europe. Cold war; They chose the USSR over democracies. Since the 1940’s through to today they chose violence over accepting not less than seven different offers for statehood. 1990’s they chose Saddam Hussein’s Iraq over Kuwait. Now they choose Iran over fellow Arab states, China over Taiwan and Russia over Ukraine. It’s clear: the palestinians never miss out on an opportunity to miss an opportunity! Understandable that no other Arab country in the world supports them.
The one state solution is quite possible. It already happened after 1948 nakba/war of independence. Although the arabs and the jews were at each other's throats (many died and many were expelled from their homes). The remaining arab population in Israel lives largely peacefully with the jews in Israel, even though they were subjected to military rule for the first 20 years of the establishment of Israel. This is really what this slogan should mean. The 2 state solution was possible in the 70s or 80s, now its dead. the only alternative is the one state.
The UN ** suggested ** division of land in 1947 was one of the many times that the Arabs have rejected a two-state solution. The boundaries of Israel at independence included Gaza and Judaea/Sumeria (the West Bank). Jordan (Arab Palestine) took the West Bank in the 1948 war and Israel recovered it in 1967. It should not be represented as “Palestinian” and / or “occupied territory”.
@@carrier411 Ottoman Empire conquered the entire region for centuries, like Roman empire there was no single state there, most of the middle east if not all of it was part of the empire. Even though the states did not exist, people lived there for centuries and they had right to that land as opposed to refugees coming from Europe and taking the land.
@@MbekAla The Ottoman Empire was the actual Colonizer that everyone points out about any European country. I always find it weird when other nations aren’t judged by the same standards. Pan-Turkism at the end, definitely established a certain way of thinking and was very relevant
According to the Jewish Virtual Library, the party’s original party manifesto in 1977 stated that “between the Sea and the Jordan there will only be Israeli sovereignty”.
122 I was glad when they said unto me, Let us go into the house of the Lord. 2 Our feet shall stand within thy gates, O Jerusalem. 3 Jerusalem is builded as a city that is compact together: 4 Whither the tribes go up, the tribes of the Lord, unto the testimony of Israel, to give thanks unto the name of the Lord. 5 For there are set thrones of judgment, the thrones of the house of David. 6 Pray for the peace of Jerusalem: they shall prosper that love thee. 7 Peace be within thy walls, and prosperity within thy palaces. 8 For my brethren and companions' sakes, I will now say, Peace be within thee. 9 Because of the house of the Lord our God I will seek thy good. Psalm 122
Hamas and their fans do not want a state. Listen to them selves. Even when palestine will become a staye from river to sea, palestinians will not be free. The freeëst arabs live in israel
As far as I understand it, technically the UN didn't give anything to anyone. They had no ownership or jurisdiction over the land. The British Mandate was coming to a close and the Jews and the Arabs were still fighting over the land, so the UN *proposed* a partition plan that in their views would be the best way to resolve the conflict. As for the "half the land to a third of the population", my understanding is that the borders were drawn based on where the majority of the Arab and Jewish populations were settled, which coincided with the idea that the Jews would get more of the less valuable land, such as deserts, swamps, and areas with outbreaks of diseases.
@@AndreyKrichevsky Alas, the info you have is incorrect - There would've been something like 400 thousand Arabs in what was deemed to become Israel as opposed to 500 settlers. The other part was 99% Arab
@@ZS-rw4qq That doesn't really contradict what i said... There were about 1.2 million Arabs in Palestine at the time. So as you say, most of the Arabs, about 800,000 of them, lived in the parts the UN proposed for the Arabs, and practically no Jews lived there. Pretty much all the Jews lived in the part allocated for the Jews, and of course many Arabs lived there too, but 400,000 is about a third of 1.2 million, so it was a relative minority. So a different partition would give Jews more land that they didn't even settle in, where Arabs lived, and would also put more Jews under Arab sovereignty, where they were viewed as foreign invaders and wouldn't be tolerated.
@@AndreyKrichevsky The line was intentionally drawn to make the settlers a majority, yes. I mean it doesn't really matter because they expelled over 700 thousand of them in the Nakba
@@ZS-rw4qq Its very funny that Hamas supporters are trying to bring any topic to some pseudo-historical discussion of 1948 thing. It's like to describe all history of German 20-21 century as a "Nakba" of Germany in 1945-48 and count only how many Germans were expelled in that period from Czechia Poland and Russia. Out of any context. I am also curious if germans will stab rape and burn people in Liberec and Wroclaw in 2024, woud you excuse them by Nakba they faced in 1947? Obviously none of them are even born that time.
![[TH] JFT vs RLF - VCT Ascension Pacific - Day 2](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/PuIH7w_jO6c/mqdefault.jpg)
Following the outbreak of the war in Gaza, TH-cam updated its community guidelines, and as a result, the previous version of this video was age-restricted a day after we released it. We decided to edit and upload a less graphic version in the hopes that an unrestricted video will be viewed and shared by the widest possible audience. Please continue to share your comments and thanks for your support!
@@practice4523Facts over feelings.
@@practice4523 23, You may wish to first look-up the definition of the word apartheid and then, go sit with an Israeli Arab in Jerusalem's Arab quarter and ask him what he thinks of your version of apartheid.
@@practice4523at least your spelling is perfect.....
@@AccordionandViolinlife Thank you. If by now you don't know how the algorythm favors you and censors us, then you have no clue about the degree of powerful support you enjoy.
@@practice4523I guess you missed who colonized the region. Hamas could release some hostages. They have not assisted in the situation either.
You cannot chant something, you don’t understand. It’s your responsibility to get educated.
The unholy alliance between the terrorist Islamists and the left-leaning ignorant folks chanting things they don't understand and do not want to understand is really mind-boggling. I already see comments here saying that "stop arguing about semantics". It is too late for the brainwashed Islamism-sympathizing leftists.
I can and I will.
Palestine supporters and education in the same sentence is an oxymoron!
Freedom of speech?
@@oosmanbeekawoo so you dont understand and admit to being uneducated ?! what?
Before 1964 Arabs in the region did not call themselves Palestinians.
@@smithiscoming they even rejected the term "palestinian" as a zionist label. until the founding of the PLO the arabs in the region considerd themselves southern syrians
@@smithiscomingyes really. 1st time in history a nation of pstine was claimed in wb/aza was 1968. Year AFTER Yiz liberated them from jordan and egyot respectively.
@@the_general7393
That's so interesting.
@useyourdelusion6807
Well...
Most Arabs in the 1930s and 1940s were transient migrants who came for British jobs.
British landownership records show Arabs living in the area owned only 3.3% of the land allotted to Israel by the UN.
The grandparents of Palestinians squatted or rented.
Nonsense, this is not about Arabs, this is about Arabs and Africans who call themselves Palestinian who live in N.E. Africa. You are being disingenuous by including all Arabs. There are Arabs in Yemen, Iraq, Jordan etc, do you mean them too ? Golda Meir called herself a Palestinian, Ariel Sharon was born in 1928 with a Palestinian birth certificate. You people need to stop reading books form middle, and start from the beginning, intelligent people do that.
"Israel uses rockets to defend it's people, hamas uses people to defend it's rockets." - Bassem Eid
Omgggggg you need to be educated. Is it hamas who was given refuge by palestinians when they were being killed and being kicked out of every country ????? No Palestinians gave refuge to JEWS who illegally took over palestine taking advantage of poor Palestinians.
Ok so brutally murdering infants and women is ok???? Raping them is ok ???
Oh I forgot Israel is just defending its people ohhhhh.
😆
Egypt , Kuwait, Jordan and Lebanon all expelled the Palestinians from their countries and you won't believe the reason why .. it will shock you.
What is the reason why?
All expelled ? Recheck your informations please
@@marianbarree feel free to explain what actually happened according to you then
@@esther7867 They tried to take over
@@esther7867 look up black September 1970. When Arab countries in the region accepted Palestinian "refugees" they tried to overthrow their government and take over.
Israeli truly wanted to live with their neighbors. The most peace loving israeli were the victims on oktober 7
Chanting slogans like "From the River to the Sea" and "Globalize the Intifada" without knowing what it means and what it can imply to different people is just irresponsible. Educate yourselves, kids. Stop repeating slogans you really don't understand.
Most of them are paid y the very rich puppeteers, they don't have to understand or educate themselves.
they all know what it means
@@jayreynolds4900 they clearly don't
From the river to the sea Palestine is illegally occupied over 78 years from illegal invasion of European unwanted Jewish zionist rejects
I'd very much like to think they don't understand. I wonder how they'd react to something like "Bring the Nova to Harvard".
College students chanting something they didn't know it's meaning? how do they even achieve to go to a college?
they're rich. it costs over 300k for that education. And not one penny donated to suffering people.
reservation and others money
money!!!
Very common for them to waste their education screaming at windmills.
CHEAT ... Like most people from any fields 🤣
They are Arabs not Palestinians who came from Egypt and Jordan
Correct ✅
@@richierich440007they are canaanites, speaking arabic
@@Bengalinationalistthe Canaanite people disappeared from the historical record approximately 2500 years ago. But hey, today’s self identified Palestinians - the majority of whom are descendants of 19th/20th century immigrants from surrounding countries - will claim any ancestry to try to solidify their ahistorical claims. Do, first they claim to be canaanites, then philistines. And did you know Jesus was a Palestinian? Repeat lies often enough and they are accepted as truth, as Goebbels taught.
@@Bengalinationalist how many tribes lived in Canaan when the Hebrews came?
@@Baruch2109lots - read the Bible
One thing not mentioned, the fact that its never hade existed a nation called "palestina" in the world history.
Indeed..claiming "both identities are deeply rooted"is a load of BS.
Buddy, nothing existed before it did. At one point this was palestina. I am israeli, but people should stop pretending that others don't exist
@@naattxxnaattxx7055 learn your history, there has NEVER existed a nation called or named "palestina" in the worlds history.
@@tomasandersson2182 relearn yours, because it did. The romans got pissed and renamed this place. You could argue that beforehand it was israel, but then theres no end to this thing. One could argue this should be canaan, but the thing that matters is not who existed back in the day, or who originally was here.
It is who's already here. And currently, there are both israelis and palestinians. They're here, and you can't ignore it.
@@naattxxnaattxx7055 What i can?t ignore, is historical facts.
If the world really believes in truth, justice, they read the actions of bothe Palestinians and Israelites 🇮🇱. One group longs to wipe out the other for long time even sending their own kids to die. whereas other group defended, has built a nation beautiful and has become super power in 70 years. Also many different religious people are living peacefully within it's boundaries. Judge for yourself and stand with justice
you say as your rockets continue to kill civilians, a third of whom are childeren
Only one "small" correction: the PLO decree is from 1964. Prior to the six day war.
"History is very clear about what happens when you smash together a bunch of hostile populations into one country and tell them to play nice." I think most of us can agree that the British made a colossal mess of things. At any rate, both the Israelis and the Palestinians are here to stay. Somehow, a way to live in peace must be found.
For that racist settlers and the majority of "Palestineans" have to be pretty much "reeducated".
I don't mean that in the way of "reeducation" camps, I mean that by transforming the educational system. Right now Israel can't change the "Palestinean" system, but they can adjust their own.
With that I mean that there should be less of a split between Arab Israelis and everyone else, there should be mainly mixed schools. Maybe excluding the Druze.
Another point is that all the dirty parts of Israeli history should not be neglected. The ugly truths should always be taught. Of course I don't ask for an anti-Israel curriculum, but for example Jewish terrorism prior to the founding of Israel and in general the conflicts should be explored.
I can't say how they could fix the "Palestinean" system. Maybe funding and helping "Palestineans" who promote peace and dialogue could help.
The best way would be to integrate them into the Israeli education system though. But that would be _very_ hard to pull off, considering many "Palestineans" get taught to hate pretty much as soon as they can grasp this concept. And it would require international support instead of mindless promotion of Palestinean statehood.
A huge problem is also Islam. It either needs to be dropped (preferable, but next to impossible), or they need to be taught the "cafeteria" version, which ignores all the hatred and oppression of Jews mentioned in Islamic texts.
The divide is harder than ever, but there is a way towards peace. And while it is not a quick solution, taking steps now could both strengthen Israel, especially the connection between Arab Israelis and Jews, and be a step onto a path towards peace, not just survival.
Yes! I am pro-P4lestine, but Yes, only if everyone would play nice. No mass murders for one.
Chanting "From the river to the sea" is violent to you but "From the Euphrates to the Nile" is peaceful ?
@@ThePandafriend "racist settlers"
oh you mean the biggest slavers in history who castrated millions of "abeeds" for milleniums? you mean Muhhamed Rida who claimed that "selling land to jews is a sin" and thus starting the war?
you mean the arabs who attacked the semitic canaanites and stole their lands? the people who still trade the most amount of "bacha bazi"?
@@ThePandafriendReading your comment...you sound mental.
They’re too busy protesting they don’t have time to do research
weird this has so few views. maybe people reported this for being too peaceful or for shining light on their ignorance
This is because the world, generally, does not care about truth. (Jeshua said: I am the truth)
@@yaakovbendovid3253 because its just zionist propaganda full of half truths
@@yaakovbendovid3253 Quoting that out of context is not "truth"
True, but everyone knows Amber Rose 😅😂
شكراً يا حابيتي!!
Agree so much, Israel is the best country in the Middle East and such a great home. May we (all Israelies) finally get to live here peacefully 🙏🙏
If you want peace, why do not you return home? Be it Poland, Ukraine, Germany. In Ukraine there are already tens of thousand of Jews coming to settle.
@@Lukey-o9m Jews are already home
@@Lukey-o9mJews are the indigenous inhabitants of Israel, keep crying, little boy.
@@Lukey-o9m we DON'T welcome them here.
@@Lukey-o9maccording to dna tests and Jewish archeology, this is their home.
That’s true. The original 1964 PLO charter even renounced claim to Gaza which was ruled by Egypt, and the West Bank which was ruled by Jordan. The creation of a Palestinian Arab identity was to destroy Israel and then an attempt at pan-Arabism
There was no Israel before 1948, and the whole Jewish nation was created after a promise by UK, a colonial power that occupied the land. This was one colonizer handing the land to another colonizer, and even if no national identity as Palestinian existed for the local population, no body has the right to force them off their land where they have lived for centuries.
@@MbekAla The Jews were slaughtered by the Romans and exiled. They never forget their ancient homeland. Even in exile at Passover they say ‘ next year in Jerusalem’. King David made Jerusalem Israel’s capital 3000 years ago. There has never been a Palestine. It is a British colonial creation. Several hundred years ago, a Dutch explorer explored the Holy Land. The villages all had Hebrew, Greek, or Latin names - nine Arab in origin. Can you even name one Arab village there from 2000 years ago ? Archaeology is filled with evidence of Jewish existence there. And yes, Jesus has even used the word Israel
@@MbekAlaarabs are the colonizers... they come from arabia not the levant. Islam was impossed on the whole middle east by colonizers
@@MbekAla Actually, the Jewish nation was re-created after a promise by UK (Balfour Declaration). And who were the colonizers after the Romans? The muslim Arabs and then the muslim Turks until 1920, after many many CENTURIES without even a 'Palestinian' living there but Jewish and Christian settlers. The English were there not even 30 years.
@@edus9636 So you are telling me that you are getting back the land after it was conquered by Romans, muslim arabs and Turks? , let me tell you that you are leaving behind a big chunk of land since parts of Egypt, Lebanon, Jordan and Iraq were all under the jewish kingdom in the past.
And according to the Taurah at least jews were not the first residents of that region but they were chosen by god to live there, so people existed in that area before jews.
With your logic, the whole map of the world would need to be recreated and Roman/Persian Empire would reconquer the entire world.
When we ask them which river and which sea, and they can’t answer those same people will try to deflect or get angry. We are showing them they know nothing and are just obsessed. I find those are so angry and hate-filled.
Chanting "From the river to the sea" is violent to you but "From the Euphrates to the Nile" peaceful ?
@@themuhammadalifan8693 : We know what it really means. Why are you bringing up nonsense no one knows about and is not part of this conflict?
What's on the Likud charter is peaceful?
@@ivanj.conway9919 You do all, Don't run away. You hate when Palestinians say from the river to the sea don't be hypocrites. Palestinians don't say Greater Israel nor do they wanna conquer the world as your Zionist ideology. You wanted to wipe out Palestinian Christians and Muslims so you came up with this Oct 7 thing like you've been doing since 1948.
From the Jordanian river to the Mediterranean sea 🇵🇸
Now show the video on the persecution of Jews and Christians in the 1000 years that Islam conquered the area.
Where did the large Jewish and Christian communities in the Arab countries go?
Yep, we have videos about a lot of that:
What Happened to Mizrachi Jews of Arab Countries? th-cam.com/video/Y4NjZBD9fW4/w-d-xo.html
What Happened to Iraq's Jews? th-cam.com/video/DnXSOQqzaKA/w-d-xo.html
The Rise and Fall of Jews in the Ottoman Empire: th-cam.com/video/UMFYBNMR3pg/w-d-xo.html
Let us know if you'd like more recommendations!
no way you got dunked on by a news channel
Have you ever heard of conversion???? Interesting cocept, I recommend reading about it!!!!!
@@imaneechahir8329 the "choice" of death, dhimmitude, or converting is NOT much of a choice...
@@dehe82 This.
Israel is the freest country in the region already
if only the Palestinians agreed to the UN resolution...but instead, they got greedy.😑
Correct
The "Palestinians" didn't get greedy. Land or a state was never the goal. It was always that Israel should cease to exist.
It's not greed...it's' radical Islamic fundamentalism that is keeping this region in turmoil. These Muslims are still living like it's the 8th Century.
"If only the Blacks and Jews were grateful of reparations and free stuff they got, but they got greedy"-Nazis
You're a disgusting person.
yeah how dare they want their ancestral homeland back from colonizers
Good to know what INTIFADA really means
I always think of Taylor Swift when I think about what INTIFADA really means
We all know in means shaking off but it is the means by which you implement the shaking off. INTIFADA in implementation means killing Jews.
Intifada simply means uprising
@@hello6437 "uprising" like the communists against the starving farmers
"antifa" that uses quotes from Mein Kampf
"resistance" that enslaves their own people for pleasure, like "bacha bazi"
@@hello6437 , well... not any more.
Thank you for explaining this in a way that diverse people can understand. Thank you again for furthering my knowledge.
It’s going to need to be furthered more than this, personally, this does a horrible job of education anyone.
@@ABBCoffical what would you want people to know that was not mentioned m?
@@ABBCoffical😂 nice try but fail
It's really a very sympathetic video. That's what all videos on the conflict should be like
@@Butterfly-ADHD : Apparently, if it does not fit in with their M brainwashing agenda, it is not proper information and education.
Mossab Hassan Youssef said that Palestine only existed less than 30 years, in the Mandate period.
Fully agree with him and almost everything else he says!!
The Israeli spy? Yeah very trustworthy unbiased source
There's no name of a lybia in history yet it's exist right now.
We can't claim anything on the name of 4000 years of history. And if we then Europeans hasn't right to live on north American Oceanian and south american continent because it's not belongs to them according Bible and history
how long did the kingdom of Israel last for?
@@abbotsful kingdom of israel/Judea/Land of Canaan existed for a few centuries before the arabs and romans attacked. it then was occupied, taken back by the semitic canaanites and eventually lost to romans who renamed it to "syria philistina" by Hadrian
Mossab is crazy traitor hhhh read history babe u are ignorant
How anyone thinks that this conflict is a simple matter is beyond me.
As simple as quantum entanglement and mechanics. You only need a couple of PhDs to understand it. Easy as pie.
From the chip shop at the sea, fish and chips should be free😂
They don’t know the Jordan River but claim enough knowledge to make a judgment..interesting
It's the Jordan River.
@@unclesteveE people use both terms, these idiots don’t know either term nor where it is
Hey, NY mom: IT’S NOT “the Jordanian River”. It’s the River Jordan. Rivers OFTEN form or denote INTERNATIONAL BOUNDARIES, & that’s true here. “Administrative Control” is USUALLY SHARED JOINTLY by Both or All parties affected.
@@michaelshapiro1543 ok, whatever you say. I apologize for a spell check error. I am sorry offended thee. But my friend who works for the Jordanian government along with his family has called it that. He’s really not ignorant, and from the actual area.
So, I probably am correct that they can be used interchangeably
But if that little critique of using the -Ian made you feel smart, then enjoy
Either way, they don’t act like they care about actual people or they’d help get them food and collect donations to do so. I am doubtful that beating up a university janitor in NY and making people not be able to get home on the subway has saved 1 life. They are truly ignorant as they told me that Gazans don’t need food, they need awareness. Everyone over a certain age in childhood is aware of this conflict. It’s not Sudan where most people are clueless. As someone who had family and friends in Syria under ISIS, I know that they can get actual life saving supplies to innocent civilians if they actually cared; we did in Syria
@@NYmomAdrienne3915 Well, you're pre-occupied with many issues. Fine. But claiming a river, that serves also as an international boundary, as the property of any ONE country is an error of law & logic, not a "spell check error". Cheers!
As always I appreciate the fact that you present an honest and objective viewpoint.
What a joke😂
@@ABBCoffical wow. How insightful.
@@LapinDebogues if you want an honest viewpoint might I suggest Al jazzeera for news and Norman finklestine for history
Honest. If this video is honest then I'm fucking Joe Biden.
I would recommend doing more research into this, this is really not totally honest and not objective Ilan Pappé would say on this
Free from Hamas.
From the Ganges to the Tigris, India shall be free! Anyone can play that game.
Nice effort juggling words not to say the blunt truth and being "cancelled" , the fact that no Arabic nations want to accept any refugees from Gaza already tells the story. Also, Israel has many Arab people living their lives in its territory, but how many Jews live in Gaza, Iran, Lebanon, etc... ?
That shows how compassionate those neighbour Arab countries are towards anyone that is not Arab ... or even towards their Arab Gaza neighbours...
Yup. There's a reason population of Jews in most Muslim countries dropped so hard that ethnic cleansing is a term that should be used to describe what happened.
right around 1903 jews started dissapearing. even more started dissapearing once the grand mufti visited germany in 1937, and met the painter in 1941 as the pictures show
wonder where they "dissapeared", with trucks heading to Auschwitz.. surely it was supply trucks right?
Every Middle Eastern country that has accepted Palestinian refugees in the past was given ample reason never to do so again, from civil wars to assassinations to siding with the Iraqis when they invaded Kuwait.
It's a very problematic slogan. What about the jews who bought the lands and the ones who farmed in it?
Hamas is the one stalling the peace, and who is supported by hamas? Iran, who's ironically also destablizing the whole region
You’re going to ignore the decades of oppression? Thought so.
@@ABBCofficalnope. Plo been oppressing its owm since 1964 when fake nation of pstine was invenred. Thats the only oppression by their own leaders
@@ABBCoffical
Palestinian oppression:
No elections
No free speech
No civil rights
No women's rights
No LGBTQ rights
State sponsored murder of hamass and fatah by their elected governments.
All of this daily oppression is ftom PA and hamass.
Bonus round: hamass has morality police to force women's to dress as hamass dictates.
Married women need a note to leave their homes.
There's your oppression.
@@ABBCofficaloppression brought on by themselves by being violent?
@@aaronlol6703 no? Unjustified, unprovoked, systematic oppression started by Britain. This started when they decided they wanted the land and they took it. But no, when they fight back it’s violence.
The big question is why don't the Arab countries help the Palastine people.
Egypt, Lebanon and Jordan do not help because they have wlways tried to overthrow there governments.
Why Europe don't make Israel in Europe or their stolen 3 continent (n-s America and Oceanian) ?
Because they do not want to deal with terrorists.
Well, if this happened before arab spring pretty sure everything would be different
From what I know, Lebanon was a Christian state and today it is controlled by Hezbollah
@@nurulhudavijapurwala4936 Because Isreal is the holy land of the Jewish faith?
There is no place called Palestine, it is either the west bank or gaza
Before the State of Israel was established. The Arabs chose to live in the lowlands. and neglected the mountains. But Jews who were already living in Israel, and Jews who came from Europe because of the Nazis. They settled in the mountains and in places the Arabs did not want to live. The Arabs saw the success of the Jews. And they started with terror, burned settlements, slaughtered Jews. and did pogroms. It was difficult for the Arabs to see the Jews succeed in places where they did not. Israel was under the control of the British. who ignored the attacks of the Arabs. But they persecuted Jews... and even hanged Jews who hurt the British. In the end the British had to leave Israel... and the rest is history. Slowly the establishment of the State of Israel began. But this still did not stop the Arabs from harming the Jews. Palestine is a definition that the British chose to define on the map an area in the Middle East. When the British left. The state was established. Israel. But suddenly the Arabs realized that they were losing their power. But this was not their country. They were laborers brought by the Turks. How could there be a state of Palestine. What president or prime minister did they have, or what currency did they have...
Man in one of the Montreal protests the speaker was chanting “Palestine arabiye, Palestine will be there.” Blatantly misleading all the non Arab speakers into thinking he’s making a translation.
The bottom line is that palestine will be free and the europeans will go back to europe
@@practice4523 23, Please, educate yourself on the Misrahi.
@@davidshapiro5616 I am very much aware of the Mizrahi. That's why I said the Europeans will go back to Europe. The true Middle Easterners will remain behind. Remember that 500000 Israelis left after Octo 7, so it has already begun. Those who belong will stay, and those who don't will return to where they actually came from
@@practice4523 While there was a dip in migration from Israel with more leaving that coming the tide has now turned the other way. Unfortunately, many that arrive seem to be from the the US with extreme nationalist views following the religious ideology of Rabbi Meir Kahane. I probably don't need to tell you about Rabbi Kahane.
@@davidshapiro5616 I know all about Kahane. My point remains unchanged, the transformation of Israel into anti-democratic repressive state began long before Oct 7. It was cemented by the election of Ben Gvir and Smotrich. Those people are incompatible with the West yet fit perfectly well in the Middle East. Whether or not Hamas loses, the extremists have taken over and will drive out the sane Israelis. If Hamas doesn't destroy Israel, it will either implode or be pariah-ed into oblivion. Either ways Ashkenazim will not stay and find out
It doesn't matter what they say, Israel is here to stay!
If the Arabs of Palestine were truly interested in peaceful coexistence they would have accepted one of the many offers for their own state next to Israel over the past 80 years.
The PLO and Hamas tend to act as talks get serious.
@@Butterfly-ADHDif by act u mean regusing peace, then sure
@@Butterfly-ADHD😂😂😂 by refusing peace yea
@@useyourdelusion6807 act as in violence
@@Butterfly-ADHD
PlO and hamass tend to act when Iran is doing something they want quiet. PLO and hamass are beards.
They chant "Globalize the Intifada" and surprised that Taylor Swift concerts almost being attacked
which is "Globalize the Intifada"....
57 Muslim countries, among them 22 gargantuan Arab countries chock-full of oil. 1 Jewish state. Seems fair.
Exactly what I said and the land was left as infertile and useless
We just don't want jewish state in our Muslim's land.
Middle East is for muslims right now. It's not belongs to Jews and Christian if both religion was originated there in history it does not matters and if you impose jewish state and Christianity on Muslim middle East then we know according history history Christianity doesn't belongs to Europe. We impose Islam on Europe. So decide your self you want to impose jewish state on Muslim's middle East or you want a Islamic Europe
So when land is unused by its original people, European settlers could come and take it ? I think that sounds a bit like what colonialism is O_O
Europeans did not believe Africans were using the continent properly, came might white man to properly use the resources and claim the land for their own.
@@garimakaya3403 for European settlers to use ?
@@MbekAla The Jews made the desert flourish. Look at the Saudis: still surrounded by sand, although they have more than enough money to green their whole country. But extravagant palaces, expensive private orgies, mega yachts, training of terrorists and building thousands of mosques and "cultural centers" worldwide are more important. The result of marrying their cousins for 1400 years...
Another brilliant video and educational briefing with a responsible and reconciling conclusion. Thank you.
Your analysis truly earned my subscription for your channel. Good job man
Wait! You forgot that we left the Gaza Strip in 2005!
But Gaza was fenced in.
"many students walked back after realizing their mistake" is that a fact? i wish it was, but those students dont seem to be going away, even after learning taht they are standing in support of terrorism and genocide. if they had the mental capacity to actually learn and be inquisitive they would be on the side of israel..
Resistance is not terrorism and only the blind will not see that a genocide is going on. These students have the mental capacity to learn and be inquisitive and with the correct knowledge acquired they are not standing on the side of Israel.
@@khalidalaudin616 keep believing the liers that steal food and build tunnels instead of hospitals...oh, and send aid money to qatar.
@@khalidalaudin616uhh killing citizens is. Stop supporting Terrorism
אחלה גבר הסברה מדוייקת עבודה טובה !
Nice job once again Unpack'd!! Always reliable, quality content one can trust to have been well researched and factual! Thank you!!
95% of Palestine fanboys don't know what river and sea they refer to.
God bless Israel and the IDF.
The ignorance and hypocrisy of these demonstrators runs deep knowing nothing about a conflict even less about the history of the region yet to think you got it figured out how we should live is astounding,would they live peacefully in the same country with someone who says they want you dead and gone any way possible?
Three times..
Three times the Palestinians were given the opportunity for their own state and to live alongside Israel in peace - but chose violence.
1. UN Partition Plan (1947)
2. Camp David Summit (2000)
3. Annapolis Conference (2007)
And another time when Israel disengaged from the Gaza strip in 2005, when Gaza’s people democratically chose Hamas - a terror organization to rule, and by that - doomed them to be so called “refugees” forever, while Israeli people chose peace and prosperity over and over again.
That's the only thing I was missing in the video. Other than that, great video.
Thank you 🙏 And yep we have a whole video just about that (and it’s more than 3!) - th-cam.com/video/1kYWII25cxM/w-d-xo.html
You omitted the Peel plan of 1937.
I refuse to believe people will choose the harm of another people when offered freedom from their injury, starvation and death of their people.
Because the outcome of that thought are that entire people should be ruled by another people like dictators, a regime that leads to greater amounts of suffering than any other type of system.
Jews and Black people had become beholden to the will of white Gentiles for white Gentiles to enact their barbarous atrocities. Palestinians are beholden to the will of Israeli people because of this mindset.
Sunak got it right. Good for the Prime Minister.
Sunak should have said that by looking into a mirror and he will surely see who that idiot is.
sadly he gets a lot of hate for saying this
If someone says from the River to the Sea Eretz Yisrael will be free, does that automatically call for the elimination of all Palestinians?
No... because it doesn't call to REPLACE anyone that's already between that river and that sea. Just calls for Eretz Yisrael to remain in existence. See the difference?
No one I know says that so it's a moot question. Greater Israel proponents are just as crazy and dangerous as Greater Palestine ones. Two states, two people, the only viable solution. We're just not ready for it now.
@@Nom1fan this can be applied to both chants, logically you cannot say this is different than the other when it uses the same words. However, there is a difference, Israel is already free and individuals are living under civil law. While, many palestinians live under military israeli law. Making israel rule over what the other state is able to conduct or not conduct, this means FREEING people. Being free means being able to study, work, move freely, like all others are.
@@krinzey3090 No palestinians live under Israeli military law. That is a propagandist lie.
Gaza is completely self governed. The only intervention Israel has is due to terrorism. In both West Bank and Gaza there is a sea of endless terrorism from land, underground, and sea. A bit from the air too. If you call any nation defending its border from terrorism "controlling under military law" it is impossible to defend borders.
Palestinians have their own zoos, hotels, universities, restaurants and anything else they wish to have. As long as it's not terror Israel doesn't get involved in any of that. This is easy google maps search away for any to see, including pictures and videos. Please stop spreading lies and propaganda and stop supporting horrible terrorists.
@@krinzey3090 is palestine currently from the river to the sea? no. israel is, so it means for israel to remain. does israel currently rule the palestinians? also no
Awesome to my mind very unbiased and well explained content showing both sides. Thanks a lot. It is very much needed in these heated times
Thank you for using the correct map of Israel throughout this video, since it's so rare to see it used - an Israel that includes the Golan Heights but does not include Gaza or the West Bank.
Also, I would add that if the slogan is truly a call for freedom for all people living in Israel/Palestine, it would be "From the river to the sea Israel AND Palestine will be free". It's simply inaccurate to say that "both sides use the slogan", when in Israel it's a minority opinion of the far right parties and in the Pro-Palestinian circles it's the most prevalent slogan out there.
If you're not you jewish you might want to try to understand why we would assume the worst when hearing this. We have a certain history. And you will never hear any slogan even remotely similar to this one at a pro-Israel demonstration.
"The Nazis made me afraid to be a Jew and the Zionists made me ashamed to be a Jew." Israel Shahak, a Holocaust survivor
And Muslim Allah likes Israel
It is impossible to free a land by removing another ethnic group which also resides on that land. It did not work in Rwanda, and it cannot work anywhere.
good job explaining things
Its too far gone to have a two state. They will never play nice.
I would recommend looking for what Israeli far right (ruling party now) say about two state solution, you will see that not only Palestinians are the obstacle here. Some Israelis are even calling for building settlements in Gaza
"never" is a strong word, there's peace today between Japan and the West, and Germany and everyone else. But a direction change will definitely need to happen.
It's pretty obvious that the majority of student's do understand the chant, and really it's pretty obvious what it means too. How can you say that they don't know what they're protesting for when they have actively chosen to put themselves at risk for it...
Very thorough and the least biased review on this topic. Added credibilty using good Arabic or Hebrew language. ممتاز מְעוּלֶה .
Israel will take Gaza back and the Arad Squatters will be free to live in the sea😅
Lets try this:
From the River to the Sea Israel will be free and Prosperous"
Most neutral video I have seen on the conflict. Props to you!
Language enthusiast here.
I'm pretty sure that the river in question is the Jordan, and the sea is the Mediterranean. Stop me right now if I'm wrong, otherwise, please indulge me in a detour.
I like to see languages thrive, and I'm always enthusiastic to see moribund language groups pull themselves out of a hole -- one usually inflicted by hostile enemies in pursuit of territory. I root for Irish, Navajo, Cherokee, Nahuatl, Guarani, and the countless other languages that define ethnic groups even more than their creation myths and whatnot.
In my own country of America, there was a popular expression that said "The only good Indian is a dead Indian". At some time in history, the perpetrators of that idea began to notice that it wasn't very nice -- "unchristian", you could say. So they changed the phrase to "Save the boy, kill the Indian." Not much better, IMHO. Even though most of the original Americans are now Christian speakers of European languages, they still live at a clear social and economic disadvantage. Are we, as modern Americans, willing to say that we must be Euro-Christian "From sea to shining sea"? Is there NO room for ANYBODY ELSE, even if they were here a long time ago?
Now, right before I return to the topic at hand, let's put this in the back of our minds: Anglophones have always had an affinity for one another, more or less. However, people in The US, Canada, Australia, New Zealand or other part-English speaking places like South Africa, India and Nigeria never call ourselves English, or "Englishmen". We acknowledge our kinship with Britain and its offspring, but we don't call ourselves a group -- except "Anglophones." Arabic speakers, on the other hand, DO indeed call themselves Arabs, regardless of their genetic makeup or what state issues their passport. I remember Nasser's call for pan-Arabism. It didn't come to pass, but the concept IS a thing, and there IS an affinity between, for example, Algerians and Iraqis -- of a different sort than exists between Americans and Scots -- neither of whom is "English". That special affinity comes up often. (There's even an extended affinity with non-Arab coreligionists, but we'll skip that for now.)
So, let's get back to "The river to the sea". Arabic culture already exists from the Atlantic ocean (Mauritania and Morocco) to the border of Iran. While there are normal linguistic differences over a three-thousand mile span, there's an "official" Arabic dialect (based on classical language) that is mutually intelligible over the whole swath of land.* It's pretty clear that the byword a long time ago was "The only good non-Muslim is a dead non-Muslim." Maybe the conquerors, a bit apprehensive about participating in genocide, chose to relax things and say "Well, if you recognize God as Abraham did, then you can still live here -- as long as you pay a special infidel tax." I suppose there was redlining too.
So everybody from the old school is gone. Nobody in Egypt speaks Coptic, except a few Christians in church -- and even they're on the way out just as surely as Jews were pushed out. ALAS, there's a fly in the ointment. Those pesky Hebrews on the eastern shore of the Mediterranean keep inviting their coreligionists in diaspora to come back! WHAT A HORROR. There's no place for THOSE PEOPLE -- ANYWHERE FROM MOROCCO TO PERSIA, or South Asia, or Xingang, or the 'stans. NO PLACE WHATSOEVER. REMOVE THEM!
This is a matter of religion, specifically supernatural religion, even more specifically among frightened people in parochial and provincial places who depend on the approval of neighbors as much as they depend on air and water. To say it's not a matter of religion is like saying the American Civil War wasn't about slavery.
So there you go. Depending on the scope you choose, you can make any group a majority or a minority. (After all, pale Caucasian people form a minority in the world, but in America we call them the majority.) You can call the Arabs of Palestine "an oppressed minority" if you have severe myopia, but the Jews of the area are the real minority. Unlike Kurds, Yazidis, Roma, and other stateless people, Jews DID have a state that got put out of business about 2000 years ago. They returned and rebuilt the language. The basic laws and customs had been kept largely intact, even in diaspora. They integrated skills they had learned elsewhere and put it all to good use. But those small-time, small-town gossips of Arab Palestine can't stand them. (Although Israeli Arabs might see things differently.) So, if you think about the phrase "river to sea", and expand your view a little, you get to see how stupid a sampling it is. If all you see of a hand is the fingernail, you won't get a very good picture of the whole thing.
Finally (at last), let me continue to wear out my welcome with this parting thought on language, this time regarding the word "genocide". There are 4 million native Hebrew speakers. There are 350 million native Arabic speakers. If you kill 4 million Hebrew speakers, that's a genocide. The language, thus its people, will be dead. If you kill 4 million native Arabic speakers, -- no let's make that 40 million, or 1/2 the population of Egypt -- you'll only have 300 million left. That would be a disaster and a crime, but not a genocide. So please, people, open your scope of view and use words that mean something.
End of rant.
*The history of how that happened is not known to me, but I find it difficult to believe that the indigenous people from Morocco to Egypt deliberately abandoned their languages, cultures and mythologies simply because they were impressed by the Arab businessmen who were expanding their trade routes to Spain. I suspect coercion and violence were involved -- just like in the Americas -- but it was a long time ago, so we can let is slide for now.
Your channel is awesome. For someone who hardly knew shit about Israel until Oct 7th, channels like yours have really helped open my eyes.
As a non Jew in fact I am simply not religious. I am a man who believes extremism is rife globally and the Jewish fight centuries old deserves full support. Thanks for such an insightful summary. You have my thoughts Jewish community
Jews indeed have been facing lots of difficult times in Europe, but isn't it problematic that Europeans threw their failure of accepting the jews as their own citizens at Palestinians who have lost their land ?
Isn't a Jew born in Poland same as Christian born in Poland? if so, why would Europeans promise them a land to establish an ethnicity while they all come from various etnicities in Europe ; religion is not an ethnicity, you can find Arab Jews, Black African Jews, European jews ; they share the same religion but they do not share an ethnicity.
no one has a problem with Jewish people having peace, its a problem when they unlawfully colonize the land thats not theirs and deliberately cause instability in the region.
Jewish people were living peacefully before the creation of Israel.
@@MbekAla Sounds amazing the fact you just described the holocaust as "their failure of accepting the Jews"....There is no such thing as Arab Jews! With the British conquest, Jews who had been expelled by the Ottomans were able to return after 1917, making your whole paragraph incorrect. A homeland for the Jewish people is an idea rooted in Jewish history, religion, and culture. The Jewish aspiration to return to Zion. No matter where the Jewish community was from, we were wishing to get back to our land .Maybe you should check Ethnoreligious group online.
From the river to the sea is a genocidal saying that is wrong to use, if you are a decent person.
I'm with the peaceful side 🇮🇱❤️
This is not true, have you seen the real videos?
@@saysubhanAllah-qs5fmhave you seen the people damaging holocaust memorials and harassing any Jewish person?
First you have to understand that in the region of the British and French mandatory occupied land, all the people that were living there were ARABS Jews, Christian, Muslims, Druz, Beduin, Samaritan, Bahis, falahin and travelers. ALL WERE CALLED ARABS, the British mandate, called thier area palestina to differentiate their part from the French mandatory. So if you want to call those ARABS "palastinian" then you have to know palastinian is just a name of a rigen, which includes all the above religions not only Muslims. And therefore it does not indicate nationality, or a Gavernment, or money, or identity, the purpose of the French and British mandate was to devide the land in to individual countries with government in to an independent identity.
From 1942 to 1948 this region under the British and French mandatory was divided Farley with setting borders for each country. During those years: the countries that got their independence were;
Lebanon 🇱🇧 Syria 🇸🇾 Iraq 🇮🇶 Egypt 🇪🇬 Jordan 🇯🇴 Israel 🇮🇱 and the golf,
The ARABS OF So called "palastinian" has a state called Jordan 🇯🇴 since 1946 the British mandate gave the "palastinian" 75% from the land that was occupied by the British mandate. 75% for the "palastinian" who lived in the East Bank of the Jordan River. and 25% for the Jews who lived in Israel west of the Jordan River to the sea. Now they want the 25% of the Jewish state Israel this is the problem.
They want to invade and take over the holy land, the promised land, Isreal.
Israel ebsorbed all the people who lived in Israel Jews, Christian, Muslims, Druz, Beduin, Samaritan, Bahis, falahin and travelers all were living in this region called "Palestina" for the sake of argument, you can call all the above mentioned "palastinian".
The people of Gaza are Egyptians' falahin and travelers.
The people of Judia and Samaria are Jordanians' falahin and travelers.
The people of Gaza had Egyptions passports and netionality, which was taking away from them by Anwar Sadat and they were thrown away and abandoned. Like an orphan child by their own peoples.
The same has happened to the Jordanians in Judia and Samaria who had their passports and netionality taking away from them by King Hussain and they were thrown away and abandoned. Like an orphan child by their own peoples.
Egypt 🇪🇬 and Jordan 🇯🇴 needs to take responsibility over their citizens.
In the holy land there were living; Jews Christians and Muslims and falahin and Druz and Bedouin and Shomronim, and Bahis and travelers, who integrated in to the Israeli society since the 1948 no one left by force all stayed and lived their life in their own homes. Those who left, they left to join their family in Jordan out of free will, those who left overseas are those who could effort to move and explore opportunities after they sold their land and properties for a heftier price.
The Arabs who lives in Israel today are the descendents of the arabs who lived in Israel during the British mandate so were called "Palestain" for 18 years.
This claim of being palastinian is the most ridiculous identity that exists in this world.
As all of them are arabs falahin and travelers. There never were a palastinian nationality no palastinian money, no palastinian government, no palastinian country. There was the middle east occupied under different empires the latent was the ottoman empire for 401 years collecting taxes from the people who lived in the region. Jews stayed living in the holy land and payed thier taxes. Lots of arabs chose to travel not to own property to avoid paying taxes.
During the 401 years of the Ottoman empire and the thousands years before we did not hear about palastinian but we heard about jews and Muslims and Christians and Druz and Bedouin and Shomronim and travelers andfalahin who livedinIsrael theholylandthepromisedland. Then the British and French mandatory occupied the middle east. To deference it from the French mandatory the British called their part Palestine for 18 years. During 1942 and 1948 the middle east Was divided to countries with Gavernment with significance borders with the United Nations agreements.
Then , Lebanon 🇱🇧 was born and Syria 🇸🇾, and Jordan 🇯🇴 and Iraq 🇮🇶 and Israel 🇮🇱 and Egypt 🇪🇬 ( though we know that Egypt and Israel were existed before, during Biblical time and during occupation of other empires, the Egyptions and the jews remain on their lands for generations.)
THE PEOPLES OF GAZA ARE EGYPTIONS AND THE PEOPLES OF JUDIA AND SAMARIA ARE JORDANIANS.
MAY PEACE WILL COME DOWN FROM HEAVEN ON ISRAEL 🇮🇱
AND ALL HUMANITY 🕊🕊🕊🕊🕊🕊
"Palestinians" is a recent concept coming from the fall of the Ottoman Empire. Jews lived there more than 4000 years ago!
*Israel 🇮🇱 has been in existence long long long before the birth of the Prophet of Islam and from River to Sea, Israel will live forever*
I don't think so. Your time will come. From a Christian that has had enough of Zionists.
Christianity is way before islam and islam is just a copy cat of Christianity period
I had family that served in both world wars and I lived next to several veterans.
They had to sacrifice so much for peace their innocence there best years there conscience.
All they wanted for us in return was for us to think for ourselves to show kindness and live good and peaceful life.
It makes me sick seeing ignorant people advocate for violence and genocide.
Anti-semitism is disgusting.
This means.....Asking them to build Tunnels 🕳from RIVER , which ends at SEA.....🤣
😂😂😂😂😂
Israelis have western values.
Everyone else in the region doesn't.
End of discussion.
Israel captured the Gaza from Egypt and the West Bank from Jordan in the 1967 Six Day War. They both refused to take them back leaving the land and the war refugees to Israel's discretion. The solution is as simple as all other wars in the 20th century, the refugees must be allowed to migrate back to their home nations who have forsaken these lands and their own people.
Actually it's because there was no peace agreement. The Khartoum Resolution in 1967 was "No peace with Israel, No negotiation with Israel, No recognition of Israel" also known as "The Three Noes".
@unpacked Please don't continue using the fake, propaganda term "palestinian". There's never been a palestinian state or people. Palestina (or philistine in arabic) was a region, kinda like saying Middle East, or North America, or New England. I do feel compassion for the arab/jordanian people living in Israel. Their arab brothers have forsaken them and use them as fodder for their jihad and political aspirations.
I think they say that to free themselves from the apartheid/occupation of Israel.
What you think is irrelevant since they openly declare that it is a call to exterminate Jews, then Christians, then everybody else.
Learn what apartheid mean because there is no such thing in Israel, Arabs and Christians have full rights in Israel but not in any Muslim country.
And Israel is a country, the only occupation was Egypt in Gaza and Jordan in the West Bank.
River to sea Israel Always be Be Blessed.❤❤❤🎉
…. Facts on palestinian leadership.
For all of you out there praising the palestinian authority please note they have been on the wrong side of every issue -
During the 1940’s they chose nazis over making peace with the Jews. In 1948 they chose war over recognizing Israel. In 1967 they chose war again and got a humiliating defeat, 1970’s and 80’s they chose IRA terrorists over England and the red army faction over democratic Europe.
Cold war; They chose the USSR over democracies.
Since the 1940’s through to today they chose violence over accepting not less than seven different offers for statehood.
1990’s they chose Saddam Hussein’s Iraq over Kuwait.
Now they choose Iran over fellow Arab states, China over Taiwan and Russia over Ukraine.
It’s clear: the palestinians never miss out on an opportunity to miss an opportunity!
Understandable that no other Arab country in the world supports them.
When u understand arabic and watch arab tv ... sound soo different
I am a zionist from Massachusetts who is 72 years old. In June we are going to Israel for a wedding and to Petra and Eilat.
You unpack things brilliantly. Great video.
The one state solution is quite possible. It already happened after 1948 nakba/war of independence. Although the arabs and the jews were at each other's throats (many died and many were expelled from their homes). The remaining arab population in Israel lives largely peacefully with the jews in Israel, even though they were subjected to military rule for the first 20 years of the establishment of Israel.
This is really what this slogan should mean.
The 2 state solution was possible in the 70s or 80s, now its dead. the only alternative is the one state.
The UN ** suggested ** division of land in 1947 was one of the many times that the Arabs have rejected a two-state solution. The boundaries of Israel at independence included Gaza and Judaea/Sumeria (the West Bank). Jordan (Arab Palestine) took the West Bank in the 1948 war and Israel recovered it in 1967. It should not be represented as “Palestinian” and / or “occupied territory”.
Once again they never bring up 402 years of being colonized by the Ottomans. It is highly relevant
tell us more
@@carrier411 Ottoman Empire conquered the entire region for centuries, like Roman empire there was no single state there, most of the middle east if not all of it was part of the empire.
Even though the states did not exist, people lived there for centuries and they had right to that land as opposed to refugees coming from Europe and taking the land.
@@MbekAla The Ottoman Empire was the actual Colonizer that everyone points out about any European country. I always find it weird when other nations aren’t judged by the same standards. Pan-Turkism at the end, definitely established a certain way of thinking and was very relevant
Keep on unpacking!
I just cannot believe how "educated" people of the west support the Palestinian cause. Unbelievable.
It's about territory, it's about human rights
According to the Jewish Virtual Library, the party’s original party manifesto in 1977 stated that “between the Sea and the Jordan there will only be Israeli sovereignty”.
סרטון ממש מדהים וטוב.
מקווה שברגע שיחלישו את ארגוני הטרור יהיה מקום למשא ומתן
One of the best videos of your channel so far. Good job on this.
AM YISRAEL CHAI!!! ♥️🇮🇱🙏
I’m sure people would look at it differently if they say “from the river to the sea Israel will be free”
122 I was glad when they said unto me, Let us go into the house of the Lord.
2 Our feet shall stand within thy gates, O Jerusalem.
3 Jerusalem is builded as a city that is compact together:
4 Whither the tribes go up, the tribes of the Lord, unto the testimony of Israel, to give thanks unto the name of the Lord.
5 For there are set thrones of judgment, the thrones of the house of David.
6 Pray for the peace of Jerusalem: they shall prosper that love thee.
7 Peace be within thy walls, and prosperity within thy palaces.
8 For my brethren and companions' sakes, I will now say, Peace be within thee.
9 Because of the house of the Lord our God I will seek thy good.
Psalm 122
From the river to the sea means palestinians soon will be living in a sea.
This American generation is a lost cause when they side with the butchers of Hamas.
And being incapable of determining the difference between two sexes..freakin' basic biology even is a mystery to that generation
My slogan is:
"Palestine free without Hamas!
Israel free without hate!"
Hamas and their fans do not want a state. Listen to them selves. Even when palestine will become a staye from river to sea, palestinians will not be free. The freeëst arabs live in israel
Jordan is the Palestinian country!! 85% of the Jordanian population are Palestinians!!
1:53 UN had no business giving over half the land to a group that made up less than a third of its population
As far as I understand it, technically the UN didn't give anything to anyone. They had no ownership or jurisdiction over the land. The British Mandate was coming to a close and the Jews and the Arabs were still fighting over the land, so the UN *proposed* a partition plan that in their views would be the best way to resolve the conflict.
As for the "half the land to a third of the population", my understanding is that the borders were drawn based on where the majority of the Arab and Jewish populations were settled, which coincided with the idea that the Jews would get more of the less valuable land, such as deserts, swamps, and areas with outbreaks of diseases.
@@AndreyKrichevsky Alas, the info you have is incorrect - There would've been something like 400 thousand Arabs in what was deemed to become Israel as opposed to 500 settlers.
The other part was 99% Arab
@@ZS-rw4qq That doesn't really contradict what i said... There were about 1.2 million Arabs in Palestine at the time. So as you say, most of the Arabs, about 800,000 of them, lived in the parts the UN proposed for the Arabs, and practically no Jews lived there. Pretty much all the Jews lived in the part allocated for the Jews, and of course many Arabs lived there too, but 400,000 is about a third of 1.2 million, so it was a relative minority.
So a different partition would give Jews more land that they didn't even settle in, where Arabs lived, and would also put more Jews under Arab sovereignty, where they were viewed as foreign invaders and wouldn't be tolerated.
@@AndreyKrichevsky The line was intentionally drawn to make the settlers a majority, yes.
I mean it doesn't really matter because they expelled over 700 thousand of them in the Nakba
@@ZS-rw4qq Its very funny that Hamas supporters are trying to bring any topic to some pseudo-historical discussion of 1948 thing. It's like to describe all history of German 20-21 century as a "Nakba" of Germany in 1945-48 and count only how many Germans were expelled in that period from Czechia Poland and Russia. Out of any context.
I am also curious if germans will stab rape and burn people in Liberec and Wroclaw in 2024, woud you excuse them by Nakba they faced in 1947?
Obviously none of them are even born that time.