I've waited 4 years for this... Canon RF 35/1.4 L VCM Review
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 6 ก.ค. 2024
- Canon RF 35/1.4 L VCM
┕ B&H Photo US/CA ▸ bhpho.to/3L00JhI
┕ Adorama US/CA ▸ bit.ly/3VH2PI5
┕ CVP UK ▸ bit.ly/4eIZ9hD
┕ WEX UK ▸ bit.ly/3XH98xU
┕ Foto Koch GER (*) ▸ bit.ly/3z7fVXy
Discord Server:
┕ ▸ bit.ly/3vL4L5D
All Animations in the Video are made by businessmedia.bm
┕ Instagram bit.ly/3thGyne
--------------------------------------------------------
The Lens was lend to me from Canon Germany, no money changed hand and I had to return the lens. It's a final Lens sample.
--------------------------------------------------------
Chapters
00:00 - Intro
01:42 - The Price
02:49 - Spec Check
05:37 - a ratteling lens?
07:53 - Sharpness
09:25 - CAs
11:29 - Bokeh
14:04 - Distortion and Vignetting
17:44 - Coma
17:52 - Sunstars
18:05 - Ghosting and Flares
19:08 - Autofokus
19:42 - Video Use
21:13 - Conclusion - วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี
Perfectly honest reviewers are rare these days, thank you from the bottom of my heart, looking forward to more reviews from you sir .❤
This is unacceptable for 1900 euro. What a lemon.
Gonna have to cancel my pre order too. Thank you for this review. Saved me lots of money.
A much appreciated unbised review. I've been waiting for the 35 for quite some time.
Great, detailed review that pointed out the fairly significant flaws (for some) that a lot of other reviews haven't put as much weight on.
Also, kudos for the English channel. Talking tech in another language isn't easy!
Warping is horrible, flares are a pain. It’s really not a good lens
This lens is not intended to be used without the correction profile. As well as RF14-35. It's the modern approach, you like it or not.
Distortion is a stupid thing to complain about. I cannot believe the reviewer wasted even one second complaining about it. Let the software fix it and you will never see a problem. Since they let the software fix it, it's far smaller, cheaper, sharper, less breathing, less coma, and so on, things that can NOT be fixed in software.
There's nothing wrong with keeping my old EF 35mm f/1.4L II with an adapter on my R5. I can't see any reason to "upgrade". Thanks for the honest review.
€1900 is crazy 😵💫🤯.
Thanks for the honest review. I'm an old Sony shooter but I really like my Canon RF 1.2 glass. The 85/1.2 DS is an absolute marvel. I was expecting a continuation of the f/1.2 lineup in a 35mm model (and I would be absolutely drooling over a 35/1.2 DS LOL). Unfortunately this lens looks nothing like what I was expecting. I'm tired of waiting and will be getting the Sigma 35/1.2 instead. I know it would suck in terms of fps on the A1/A9 III but I'm getting it for the 1.2 look and nothing else.
Regarding rattling - some of my Sony lenses rattle. The 50/1.2 and 400/2.8 are probably the worst. The 600/4 also rattles but not as much as the 400/2.8. I wouldn't pay much attention to this issue. Distortions, severe vignetting, flare and CA are real problems though.
Hope you'll keep posting videos in English.
DS -🔥🔥🔥!
Cancelled my pre-order on this lens and bought the RF 15-35mm instead. Not disappointed.
Wowch! Thank you for the honest review.
Wooo good to have this review in English, thanks for this and it's an honest and refreshing view.
The RF 35mm f1.8 isn't an L-lens but it's actually a great little prime for the price. I'm happy with it and my RF 50mm f1.8.
Thanks for the honest review, glad I waited before purchasing 👍👍
I have a copy of the lens and I must say you are exaggerating the sound it makes when powered off. Beyond that though, it does have significant chromatic abbreviation without a lens profile applied. I had to add an extra +4 in Adobe Camera Raw to get rid of the last bit of purple fringing. That is disappointing in a lens of this quality. I typically run Canon raw files through DXO PureRAW and output corrected DNG files to use in Adobe software but DXO doesn’t have a lens profile for it yet. Hopefully they are working on it.
great honest review! wish you the best on the growth of your channel
Save us Sigma (with new RF mount) you're our only hope!!
Terrific review, I have the lens as well and on day 1 I have not been impressed. I'm in a position to return the lens and just go for the RF 28-70 which is such a higher quality lens even though it is F2. The rattling is already annoying me and I haven't even shot with it yet. Would you say the 28-70 blows this thing out of the water?
The 28-70 is useless for video but overall a way better lens thats far more worth the money
Thanks for pointing out all the potential flaws. I hope that the price will drop to the levels that justify the performance. I don't mind some of the characteristics, however work against bright light is mind boggling , as Canon is typically quite strong in this department. Also the rattling was something I was quite ok with until you pointed out how annoying it is in practice.
Great honest review
Staying away from this lens, sticking to the rf28-70 f2. I also have the rf 35 1.8. I usually shoot it at 3.5 or so.
Thanks a lot, this video saved money and delivered many smiles !
🙏 Thank you for your thorough honest review. I shoot w an R5C in RAW most of the time, so it’s very helpful to see the distortion issue 🤯
Thank you for this honest review. This video convinced me to get the older sigma 35mm for my r6 😊
Same!
Good points in your review! I myself is waiting to try out this lens at my local store. I think people are forgetting about the unique feature of RF lenses which is the clickable control ring. IMO Canon released it with the aperture ring for added flexibility & "unclickability" strictly for videos, and one can easily use the control ring as an aperture ring for stills if you wish to. I just thought it'll be redundant if the aperture ring would be useable for stills then knowing that you also have a control ring to use it for.
But you can use the control ring for anything else and don’t want it as clickable aperture ring. I use is for exposure comp.
Damn was so excited to get this lens but after seeing the review definitely going to pass on this one.
You’d love it if you got it. But yes if you inhabit the perspective in this video you will not appreciate this piece of glass they made. To each their own! At least rent it sometime.
@@LukeSchaeferFilms it's more the football shaped Bokeh that turns me off as during Christmas I do lots of photography that includes lights. The backlight outdoors photos were big turn off to.
Very, very good reviews.
As much as I want this lens because I want a fast 35mm prime for my r6 it seems like canon was a little lazy with this lens. Knowing everyone has been wanting this since they first announced rf lenses. I was really hoping for a f1.2 especially with how much they’ve made us wait. Will I buy this? Probably because I really need a lens like this but it’s unfortunate they didn’t put their all into this lens
raw video thing was pretty wild, how do you suppose to correct that distortion in video editors?
You can, there are ways to do it buts a additional pain in the …
@@davision-en Bizarre lens design choice and price to match by Canon in that case... I know you don't shoot Nikon Z system, but it would be interesting to see how good/bad the new 35mm f/1.4 does under your same testing criteria for 1000 euros less.
Just got a Z6 III
Great review! FYI, Canon confirmed that the iris ring will function in photo mode in future bodies. I also received my copy yesterday and it is quite a beautiful lens that is super light and renders beautifully, much better than my EF copy. As an amateur photographer most of the drawbacks pointed out are not deal breakers for me, nor have I experienced them in my limited use. I can see how the rattling may annoy people, but I don’t think that it is bad at all, and I’m a major neurotic misophoniac! I would say order or rent it and try it out before deciding based on one person’s experience. To me, this lens is totally worth it.
This rattling thing is not acceptable for a Lseries prime without IS built in - I really hope they will also release a more photo-centric 35 1.2 to complement the 85 1.2 and 50 1.2.
That’s also what I hope for
There is no manufacturers except 3rd parties who made 35mm f1.2
more photo-oriented 1.2. another witness to the big hole, who thinks that the world of professional photography is 1.2...god...
@@abercrombie2684 The 50 1.2 is a great lens for low light events, and a 35 1.2 would complement it nicely. That said, a 35 1.4 without rattling noise and distortion would do it for me, too.
@@tom_k_d It's clear. Well. If you need a good 35 1.4 then welcome to Sony) Sigma and G Master are at your service) Canon is a dead platform. even Nikon is doing more interesting things now. the same Nikon ZF. and their new glass is very good and not expensive. I’m already silent about the current mirrorless cameras.
That's a very good and honest review. I was about to throw in the money to acquire this lens but learning about the CA and vignetting and noise after digital correction stops me from buying. Guess to look for another 35mm. Any suggestion?
Wellcome to Nikon and Sony
35mm 1.8 is gold
Compare this with the much cheaper nikon z35 1.8
or the newly announced z 35 1.4
Thank you for this detailed review. You covered all the questions I had. I'm at a crossroad with staying with Canon or moving over. I was eagerly waiting for newer RF 1.4 lenses and if this is the sort of lenses coming next from Canon I might as well look at Nikon or Sony. I just need the typical F1.4 primes. I guess I need to do my homework with Nikon and Sony see their full offering. I have the R5 and R6mk2 and been using Canon for the last 20 years and I have been waiting to see what the upcoming R5Mk2 will be about. I had a Sony A74 and A73 but did not enjoy using it so sold it after 6 months of use. Now with Nikon latest bodys I will check their lens selection for primes.
@@tekguyphoto my work is using Sony at the moment and I use Nikon for everything else, and I can't stand Sony for professional work. Horrible menu system, you need glasses to read the UI elements, tethering to a laptop is second class (sometimes once a day restarts). Lenses on Sony are plentiful and some are really good, but everything else is so far behind what Nikon offers if you shoot professionally, and rely on your camera to deliver images. Canon DSLRs are also great for the same reasons, but as with Nikon I'm sure they will not be made anymore in the future.
I just bought a Z6 III instead of this lens here. Will see how Nikon performs for me.
This lens lags behind the EF 35 1.4 II in certain respects. For example in the previous lens, lateral AC was very low and axial AC was completely non-existent thanks to the blue refractive element. This element was also added to the RF85 1.2 with unquestionable results. So why has it disappeared from this new lens, and why is this lens sold for less than the old flagship? I bet there's an RF 35 1.2 in the drawer, whether it ever comes out remains to be seen, but this 1.4 lens has enough imperfections to make room for a 1.2 version.
I have the same feeling that this is not meant for photographers at all.
The RF 35mm is really cool to me. I finally have a size lens with my RF that makes it feel compact and I can carry it everywhere. Furthermore, the focus breathing and manual aperture are one of a kind for a lens. Certainly, made to capture video. Beautifully sharp, and yes, the compromise for the video side of things is relying more on the editing aspect. The clicking is another compromise. This lens has the fastest autofocus in the market right now. It doesn't bother me. The EF 35mm had a similar click and I loved that lens. The 35mm captures Life from a personal journal perspective. I love this lens.
It is really disappointing. I was ready to get this lens as my go-to lens, with WR, 1.4 aperture, relatively small size...Prime lens are supposed to be optimised for one focal length, and not to rely too much on digital correction.. That distorsion at 35mm is so massive...
Would you use the rf 35 1.8 over this one? I ditched my sigma a while back
Oh no not at all the RF 35/1.8 is a bad joke but a way cheaper one
@@davision-en I’d love to see a comparison video. I don’t really need the better build or extra light but would love improved autofocus and contrast
@@davision-en this is going to be the only game in town for canon users until the open their mount to third parties?
@@EastCoastDigs Adapt EF is your best choice.
Great lens.
But the aperture ring is utter unusable. Only in video mode and no click switch. I think canon missed the mark with these new lenses regarding the aperture ring. It’s like canon doesn’t understand that we all use ND filters for adjusting exposure when shooting video.
Great video, I’ll get the old EF version instead.
TY for the coma/astigmatism test. I will not buy this lens (the EF 35 L mk2 is perfect for my work) but I'll watch the 24mm version closely :)
YOU GOT THE BAD ONE MIND IS FINE !!!
I got a tested press sample from Canon. If thats a „bad one“ it would be really strange since I even asked Canon is this is expected behavior or a defect. I highly doubt that yours is any different but you will not see the Problems if you are not looking for them. I can also take nice pictures with it but that doesn’t make it optically better. How should yours be different?
Yes the aperture ring not working in photo mode is unacceptable. I was so close in ordering this lens and an R6ii. Will stick to my X-Pro2 for a while longer…
I love shooting backlit and wide open. The 50mm and 85mm 1.2 are almost flawless in that regard. I hoped this lens was on par but it looks horrible indeed. Guess I'll be keep using the RF 35mm 1.8 IS (which is a great lens btw).
The RF35/1.8 IS is even worse but at least cheap
Thank you so much for this review, honesty at the forefront. I'd really expect more from Canon at this price point. Sony really makes a better lens at a lower price point. One thing I've noticed is, that Canon doesn't like to give lens hoods in the box with the lens. Is this the same case with this expensive guy or you just dont use it?
Lens Hoods are Supplied with RF L lenses but not with STM.
@@davision-en If you can, would you do comparison between the Sony and Canon. Potentially even Nikon, but that guy isn't released yet and isn't an S line, so it's not up to the highest standard.
Great production quality in this video. The conclusion and prejudice against this lens and canon you make at the end is ridiculous though. If you don’t make much doing photo and video that’s okay, but it’s actually a very affordable lens for what it is. You completely ragged on it here lol but to each their own! Keep up with the high quality content!
It is very affordable for what it is? A piece of shit?
@@davision-en I don’t think it’s a piece of shit after corrections. And the end result is what matters. All lenses from all manufacturers are made with digital corrections in mind these days. The only negative I see with this lens is the sound of the motors. That would annoy me, but if I had the money I would be very happy to have a 35mm f/1.4. TH-cam has this obsession of tearing apart every new lens and making them seem like they are terrible unless it’s cheap and as good as a pro lens (Voltrox 1.2’s)
"it’s actually a very affordable lens" No it is not. Compared to the new Sigma 35 1.4 DG DN it is way too expensive.
"after correction" so It's okay for you that your Lens does image manipulation on your RAWs before you even touched them?
As I said, CAs didn't go away from corrections either, thats the least I would expect.
@munchmb the SIGMA is also SHIT, it's maybe a better value but not a better lens.
I watched the review in German not knowing it would be released in English too 😂. Thanks for pointing out the issues other reviewers may overlook. Would have loved a comparaisons in IQ to similarly priced Sony Nikon and Panasonic lenses.
Thank you!
I would love such a comparison but there are no similar priced lenses from the competition 😃
@@davision-en The Sony G master and Nikon 1.4G ? It's 1900€ in Europe because we get ripped off somehow. 😂 It should be sold 1600€. The C400 is 8000$ and is only 8600€ after VAT.
@@mousbleu Yes, of course you could compare it with the lenses from the other two camera manufacturers:
Nikon AF-S Nikkor 35 mm / 1.4 G UVP € 1,999.00
Sony FE 35mm F1.4 G-Master UVP 1,699.00 €
Only, both are purely lenses for photographers and do not have any special film features. You won't find hybrid fixed focal lengths like those launched by Canon with Nikon and Sony.
a Nikon AF-S lens? what? Thats DSLR.
Hey endlich auch auf englisch😄👍 sehr sehr cool
Fantastic review, thank you! I am strongly looking to leave Canon because their products lately are not standing up to their price.
I honestly think the rf mount has some of the most amazing "bang for the buck" lens, like the rf28, 100-400, 200800 etc but i really want canon to open up their mount. I am sick of waiting lol.
@@wentan8978 I have 100-500 and 200-800 isn't as appealing to me. I'd much rather have a reasonably priced prime 800 6.3 like Nikon offering. I can't find myself buying any of the latest Canon lens releases. But I am sure plenty of people need those types of lenses.
you named two lenses that you cant even use when its raining.
@davision-en yeah but the rf28 is honestly super sharp and focus extremely fast though, and I bought it on sale with a really cheap price.
100-400 is so amazingly light that I brought it to few of my hikes and don't feel tired at all, and I got a lot of amazing photos from it.
I mean, I honestly would not expect weather sealing for these prices.
By the way, I checked out your main channel, I think a lot of videos don't have official English captions? Will you add them in the future? Thanks
@@wentan8978 I thought you can auto translate german captions by youtube?
whats the button for ?
You can decide yourself for what you want to use it for
Glad I still kept my EF L prime lens
Why can't Canon figure out their lens situation? 24-70 F2.8 - tick tick tick autofocus noise. 50 1.2 and 85 1.2 - circa 1990 motors with insane shifting and autofocus noise. Now this with its noisy movement when off. Love Canon cameras but their lenses are severely flawed. Not to mention the ghosting and flaring. They're absolutely useless for video with any on-board mic. Sony can make state-of-the art, totally silent XD linear focusing lenses, with no movement, that are perfect for photo and video. What is Canon's deal?
What??? The rf 851.2 is a masterpiece do you own one? I can’t speak on the 50mm1.2 though.
@@LukeSchaeferFilms I own it. It’s phenomenal but it is noisy as hell. Circa 1990 ring type motors. You might say well who cares, who uses an 85 1.2 for video? Well the point is, and this pertains to the RF 50 1.2 as well, the Sony 50 1.2 GM uses 4 Linear XD motors that are lightning fast and completely silent whereas Canon uses extremely noisy dinosaur (ring type) motors. Hell I used to own a Samyang 85 1.4 and it was completely silent. Same goes for Tamron and Nikon.
My 85/1.2 isn’t noisy.
My 24-70/2.8 either. I can hear it but it’s not even a problem for shot gun mics on the camera.
I have no problem with motor noise.. Lens is here to do a job of delivering auto focus accurately, photo quality to be on top of the mark, as well the video quality. So far, I have RF 24 -105 L F4, RF 35 F1.8 STM, RF 70 - 200 L F2.8 and I am more than happy with it... All performing top of my expectation... It can happen that some of the lenses are bad like this specific lens, but in general, all of them are good...
I still like my tamron 35mm 1.4 sp ef
Wish It was a bit smaller ..more compact ..
I really hope you got a lemon and that this lens is usually a lot better. Wouldn't count on it though.
The lens rattle is what would annoy me to no end.
Need to be able to walk around without hearing every step lol
This is a press sample from canon as stated in the Video. And a „lemon“ gives you worse sharpness but doesn’t change anything at the other points.
Nikon just came out with a 35mm 1.4 for $599. LOL, canon RF mount sucks. too bad I have so much invested in it.
Well, it's safe to say that the 700$ Tamron 35mm f1.4 is still the best Canon 35mm lens, followed closely by the old EF 35mm F1.4 mk2. I personally didn't think CAs looked too bad as these are extreme tests for CA. Likewise the bokeh looks nice, but we do expect better from a 2000$ lens. At 1000$, it would have been a much more reasonable proposition.
Yes if it would have been cheaper the value would’ve been much better.
When the Sigma Art lenses start releasing for RF mount they will be MUCH better than this. Optically and functionally. Damn you Canon.
@@matt_4terry based on the existing version for Sony, the tamron is still better. Sigmas don't render so great and are known to fall apart quicker than other manufacturers.
@matt_4terry no FF RF lenses are alowed. Only for crop Canon mirorless only... So we must thank Canon for that also.
SIGMAs 35 1.4 is not much better, I would even say it's even worse, but I costs way less.
In my opinion it should cost around 900€/£, maybe even 799€/£! I never buy it for 1800£! 🤣 unless I would have very rich clients, otherwise price totally ridiculous to me
It is for this performance
@@davision-en exactly haha, Canon lens of the century 🤣
Enjoyable video. Looks like it is not on par with the Sony 35 1.4 GM. The Sony bokeh is more pleasing and it has no cheap rattle. Disappointing, especially for this price.
So it's more like the Nikon z 35 f1.4 but 800$ expensive
1150€ more expensive
You have categorised the objetive completely wrong. It is a hybrid lens that combines features for photography and filming. It is therefore lightweight, has a silent motor, a stepless aperture ring, no focus breathing and, according to canonrumors, the best image quality of any 35mm lens Canon has ever released. Which Sony lens offers a similar combination for photographers and film makers?
So hybrid for you means it’s not made for photo? Then it will not be hybrid but a Film / Cine Lens. Also there is no Z here in the Name.
And so for filmmaking distortion, vignetting, CAs, Ghosting and Flares are no problem? Like I said, try using this Video Hybrid Lens for RAW Video and your eyes will fall out.
And image quality is NOT just Sharpness it’s much much more. Like Bokeh rendition, LoCA, LaCA and so on.
You categorized this lens completely wrong and you shouldn’t trust Canon Rumors as your source of information. I have never seen a review or test published there. Did you?
A better version for photography better be coming from Canon - F1.2, IS, and some exotic coatings for superb contrast. Hopefully costing more that $2.5K. This thing is a toy.
Sony 35mm f/1.4 GM. This lens does everything better than this Canon lens except focus breathing, which can be digitally corrected. This digital correction is acceptable for me. Yes, Sony also does image correction, but I'm more than happy to use the lens uncorrected.
Sony 35mm f/1.4 GM. This lens does everything better than this Canon lens except focus breathing, which can be digitally corrected. This digital correction is acceptable for me. Yes, Sony also does image correction, but I'm more than happy to use the lens uncorrected.
@@Sqeezy3 That would indeed be an interesting comparison. But the Sony also cost 1700 euros when it was launched in 2021.
Not using a lens hood or a strap? Really??
I‘m not an idiot. So yes.
@@davision-en Hmm.
Think you blowing the rattle thing out of proportion a touch. Sure it’s annoying but it really doesn’t damage anything. Fuji uses LM motor (VCMs) and they all rattle. They have little rubber bumpers inside, tamaron might not move but they arguably have other problems . These are great little motors, no moving parts other than rails so in theory less wear and tear, so your investment will last longer. Store vertically in your bag and you won’t hear them at all and how you hear it when walking with the camera out I don’t know Ive never experienced that with Fuji glass when off and you have the camera hanging sending the optics down, they don’t rattle on the horizontal plain. All the other stuff is a little annoying but I’ve found all canons lens need some sort of digital correction some more so than others. Fuji glass none in most cases. And flare is subjective and can be used creatively. Not defending the lens but I think you’re highlighting things that really quite trivial and can be worked around. Te real problem is Canons glass is extremely expensive and overpriced in general and there relying on digital correcting to this degree. Just my 2cents
I haven’t said it will damage anything just that it is annoying
@@davision-en Well, you said that the noise gives the camera a cheap feeling, which shouldn't be the case at this price. This point is echoed by many comments - rattling as a low quality feature.
@@davision-en yet you spent 2mins ripping it a new one and mentioned it serval times. Must of been really troublesome
@gaza4543 If you have a Problem with my work, do it better please. I'm not you and maybe I value different things then you do.
Dunno why ppl need something unnecessary like the clickable aperture ring, i mean u can have it changed under your fingers why need it on the ring to change aperture? Let it stay for video purpose
I don’t like it either but there are a lot of people that prefer the old analog days vibe of changing the Aperture.
Wdym unnecessary? I preffer the ring to the index finger wheel. It's faster.
Nikon 35 1.4 puts this to shame and it's like 600$
I don’t know how good the Nikon is, I think noone knows right now
It will probably be little bit less sharp, with same or worst aberations, but with smaller distorsions...but for 600$ it will great little lens :)
1150€ less here in Germany.
😂🙈
Canon RF 35mm 1.4 at $1499!? And to think Nikon just released their Z 35mm 1.4 for $599. Nikon is so amazing.
I was afraid of this kind of bad results, when I saw this lens didn't had blue refractive lens like RF 85/1.2L has. I could easily pay 500€ more for this lens, if the image quality was in par with the RF 85/1.2L. But Canon decide to skip blue refractive lens on the RF 35/1.4L, so they coukd make it cheaper. Bad decision, Canon!
P.S. Why does ppl keep saying "every L lens has weather sealing". No, they don't. Most of them have, but not all.
What RF L Lens doesn’t habe weather sealing?
You took a photo from the ground level facing the sun and you're complaining about ghosting and flaring. 😂😂 what the hell did you expect facing the camera upwards towards the sun. The distortion and vignetting is very disappointing though.
I would expect the same good performance as a for example SIGMA 50/1.2 or 24/1.4 or 50/1.4 gave me when I did the same tests. 🙄
It is called backlit portrait at golden hour.
Piece of cr@p!
1900€ for this is pure greed!
Lol endure for 4 years just because canon's color 😂. And this lens isnt that good. Dude stop fanboy brand
What Fanboy? Do you know me at all? I’m not a Fanboy of anything. Stfu
@@davision-enso großartig deine Reviews auch sind (tatsächlich nahezu unerreicht in Detailtiefe und Breite an Tests), am Ton in den Kommentaren solltest du echt mal ein bisschen arbeiten. Häufig übel herablassend und sehr schnell beleidigt. Kommentare im Internet sind schon oft genug Gift und Galle spuckend (siehe Post oben von tuanminh), da musst du ja nicht auch noch ins selbe Horn blasen. Trotzdem sehr cool, die Videos auch in Englisch zu finden 👍
@@magnus7372 denkst du nur weil man in der Öffentlichkeit steht darf man keine Meinung mehr zu Idioten haben und die auch irgendwo hin schreiben?
Du weißt nichts davon wie es ist solche Scheiße jeden Tag irgendwo aussortieren zu müssen. Also wenn mir mal wieder jemand erzählt ich sei Fanboy von dies oder das und bin dumm weil ich an Canon hänge dann kann der eben auch einfach mal die Fresse halten. Sorry not Sorry.
@@davision-en und begibst dich auf das gleiche Niveau. Krone richten und weitergehen wäre auch ne Möglichkeit, man muss ja nicht auf sowas antworten, was irgendwelche Teenager ins Internet schreiben, um dir auf den Sack zu gehen. Naja wie dem auch sei, mach mit den Reviews weiter so 👍