🚨CORRECTIONS 🚨: ➤ The minimum voting age in the Weimar Republic was 20 and not 21. ➤ I am also aware that I pronounced Reichstag wrong. You do not need to point this out to me. Spotted a mistake in the video? If you think you’ve spotted a mistake, leave a polite comment saying what you think is wrong and linking a legitimate source. I’ll check and if you’re right then I’ll add the correction to this pinned comment. :) ✘ I do not engage with corrections comments which are written rudely ✘ If you leave an essay full of corrections, I won’t check it because I have other, better things to do
Fun fact: Friedrich Ebert used article 48 136 times (good statistic to put in exams) Another fun fact: The average length of a government’s time in power from 1919 to 1933 was just less than 8 months (also a very good statistic to put in exams)
(Btw I have a history exam tomorrow and I find the English videos about this topic better than the German so I watch them... thanks for making this video:))
i have since ascended to realising that the syllable break is reichs-tag but I spent several years either believing it was reischtag, or after I started learning German reich-stag lol. Hope your exam went well!! :)
A long, long time ago...in a galaxy far way, Naboo was under an attack... (By the way, love how you add humour into your videos, it honestly makes me gain motivation to actually revise XD ).
I think im gonna get a grade 7 bcause of this video for my mocks Edit: After a week or so I got my result and I got a grade 6 , thanks for this video you absolute legend
Haha thanks!! I have plans to do a revamp of the 'Modern Britain A level Podcast' thing that I released the first episode of ages ago, and you might see some Tsarist and Communist Russia content on this channel at some point - those are the two topics I do at A-level (AQA), so there will be some A-level stuff - hopefully that stuff will be of use to you? :)
Hi i have a question on Article 48. Does the article state that the Chancellor can bypass the parliment in a time of crisis or is it the President? Im looking at different sources and different ones say either the chancellor or the president. Which one is the correct one?
@@Alonglongtimeago hello, I have checked very many sources including many igcse textbooks. It's the president who bypasses the parliament. Please do recheck your sources as this will create many confusions. But thank you for your videos, you are god sent❤❤
I don't do history anymore, and a teacher killed it for me i was thinking of just writing anything in the test but when I watch your videos you made history better for me and I feel like I did really well. Thanks
Just found you via your collab with UsefulCharts. Great channel, although I think there could never be enough history channels here on youtube for my satisfaction. Subbed! Greetings from Germany! :)
Thanks! I'm pleased you found me! And I agree on the matter of the number of history channels. I've had an influx of German viewers recently (the 3rd largest proportion of my views in the last 28 days, after the UK and US), which is pretty awesome (especially as someone who is attempting to learn the language)! :)
The voting age during the Weimar era was age 20, not 21. That fact is stated quite clearly not only in the Weimar Constitution, but in William Shirer's wonderful book on the Nazis, The Rise And Fall In The Third Reich(1960; Shirer's masterpiece).
Just had a quick look and you're right. Because these videos are primarily aimed at helping people with their GCSEs, the info here was stripped from a GCSE textbook - so presumably this originated as a typo in the textbook. :)
Thanks for the great video! I'm german and I wanted to see an english vid cuz I know my classmates gonna copy lots of stuff from german videos about it lol.
Pleased you like the video and apologies for butchering the pronunciation (my German is much improved since then). Also I like your thinking going for and English vid! :)
I'll be honest, everything you need for GCSE is in this video, but I don't know this topic to an A level standard because I didn't do it at A level, so I can't really help you. Sorry :(
Weak, but fluctuates at time. The golden (gold plated, in the words of Indy Neidell) years of 1924 to 1929 were a lot more stable. It was also not necessarily opposition to the constitution itself that drove some people away, but some principals in general. The Communists for instance believed it was a continuation of bourgeois democracy that only benefited capitalists, and their form of democracy was to elect councils which could be recalled and where delegates were bound by the people or councils which elected them, and opposed the president as a substitute Kaiser. Support waned as people looked to the people in particular who governed and who you thought governed and disagreed or agreed with each character with power. It had major institutionalization problems.
You missed the importance of article 25. The Reichstag could repeal the laws passed via article 48, but article 25 allowed the Reichspräsident to dissolve the Reichstag, with new elections having to be scheduled after a maximum of 60 days if I remember correctly. The combination of both allowed the Reichspräsident to rule for those periods basically on his own.
I'm interested - what would your choice of voting system be then? Would you be for first past the post over proportional representation? Are you a fan of direct democracy instead? Or, idk, are you a monarchist?
@@Alonglongtimeago Is it though? I suppose from a simplistic viewpoint it is. But the instability of PR comes from its acknowledgement and encouragement. of radical extremes, left and right, which are marginalized under pluralism (as they should be imo)
On 2:12 ye it says it is in a tree tree bc it is a tree tree bc it is a tree tree 🌳 it is a tree tree 🌳 it will take you out to your trees 🌲 your grass tree 🌲 is your trees 🌲 tree tree and green tree tree trees are you ready and we will see what they do with them for help please 🙏 it will give
I personally think that putting an unpopular and weak ragtag republic in power of a country fresh out of a war and fresh into an economic crisis, mountains of debt and a memory of a better life under a strong leader (the Kaiser) will always be doomed. Democracies never do well under crisis, especially when they're unpopular, and with coalitions in power no one really feels represented, which opens room to radicalization. A democracy is a good system for a politically and economically stable country, but never for situation which require quick resolve and action, loke war or an economic recession. This is why the best course of action for Germany at the time would be putting Wilhelm II back in power, at least symbolically as a popular figurehead, and then, after the crisis is over and a grounds for a stable economy has been built, is it a good idea to lessen the his power and give more to the elected government. Now, of course, I have the power of 21st century hinsight, but the fact remains that if a moderate Kaiser remained in power, even just symbolically, most people would have stayed infinitely more loyal zo him than a radical, populist would be dictator like Hitler. Wouldn't you agree that monarchism is even more fun in the 21st century? Tee hee...
I think you make some good and interesting points. As the mega anti-authoritarian that I am, I find myself jarring at your suggestion of putting the Kaiser back in power, but at the same time I can see the point that it would have perhaps brought about enough stability to then later bring in a democratic government - and the Kaiser would be the lesser of the two evils. The argument then would be over how you would then implement a democracy, as monarchs are notoriously not keen to give up their power, so it generally requires a violent revolution like the English Civil war. Such a revolution would again create instability, so perhaps reimplementing the Kaiser may have simply delayed the rise of a fascist regime (who knows? we can only speculate). Ultimately, I would place the largest amount of blame in the hands of the treaty of Versailles, something outside the control of the Germans - so the reimplementing the Kaiser may well have been the best thing they could have done. The other possible option that comes to mind would be communist revolution - I'm not too well versed on the KPD but as far as I'm aware, they were Marxist-Leninist, a way of achieving communism which in my eyes is extremely likely to end up in a horrific authoritarian regime like that of the Soviet Union. But if we had seen a successful communist revolution (as in one that achieved actual communism - 'a classless, moneyless, stateless society' and not what the Soviet Union called 'communism') that would have been pretty interesting.
A long, long time ago... a constitutional monarchy could’ve worked perhaps. Generally these forms of government tend to be the most stable, and a perfect balance between democracy, and stability.
@@Alonglongtimeago Well perhaps the balance of poqer would be in the power of the German nation, although I doubt the Great powers would allow that level of authonomy. The forceful abolishment of the Crown was like a final stroke to the cultural identity of the Germans, spitting in the face of everything Bismarck had fought for in the very creation of Germany. When the people lose a strong leader at a prosperous time and has their morale completely crushed time and time again, they inevitably will start looking for a new identity, a new strong leader, a new golden age, and, of course, someone to blame. The national socialists provided exactly that. Also, I am convinced a communist takeover in Germany after WW1 is virtually impossible. The old systems and ideals weren't abolished by the people at will, rather they were taken from them forcibly. Even after a lost war most still held conservative and strongly religious ideals completely incompatible with communism. In their shoes, the return of the idyllic times of the Father of the nation, the Kaiser, the patriotism, family values and prosperity was not going to happen by outright shedding any remaining contact they had with their previous identity and culture. After all, no one wants to see the radical communists finish what the Allies started with the Versallies treaty. Of course I'm not speaking of all Germans here, but certainly the majority Bottom line, when traditional values and symbols are forcibly removed, a traditionalist society would do anything to get them back. Anything.
If you had the choice to drop a uni which one would it be, I'd drop crime and punishment it's too much for me :(, also random question who is your favourite pokemon?
I would have got rid of the American West if I could, turns out cowboys really aren't that interesting lol. Also pidgeys may be a basic choice but they're very cool imo
Good god, that's not how you pronounce Reichstag, you're butchering it. but otherwise a nice video about Weimar republic. Weimar republic could not remain in that international climate. By 1930 world was changing and the only way large nation could survive was to become and empire of some sort.. Japan attacked Manchuria etc.. so it was doomed P.S. Wiki has a lot of right pronunciations on historic stuff upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/f5/De-Reichstag.ogg
Have you ever tried saying an entire sentence in English whilst saying a lone word in another language in the middle of the sentence? It's nigh on impossible not to butcher the pronunciation! But pleased you liked the video! :D
@@Alonglongtimeago I don't blame you, it sure is hard. I thought it was a joke when you kept repeating it the wrong way.. like haha German language is funny :P but unfortunately it wasn't
@@Alonglongtimeago I learned German too! Terrible grammar rules, probably made up by some sadistic people. Maybe one day you'll have the capability to pronounce it, if not i won't hold grudge and Germans lost the war so what are they going to do about it?
Just got an 8 in my history GCSE because of your vids you’re honestly a legend
Aww thanks man! Also super congrats on your 8!!!!!!!!
Thanks to you more like👍👍
Even I for my term test I wasn’t prepared but ur vids really helped out and got a 92 , thank you !!!!
In my dreams ahah I’m watching this bc I have a mock tomoz and don’t have a clue what Weimar is and my whole exam is on it
@@grymesx47 how did your Mock test go man
🚨CORRECTIONS 🚨:
➤ The minimum voting age in the Weimar Republic was 20 and not 21.
➤ I am also aware that I pronounced Reichstag wrong. You do not need to point this out to me.
Spotted a mistake in the video?
If you think you’ve spotted a mistake, leave a polite comment saying what you think is wrong and linking a legitimate source. I’ll check and if you’re right then I’ll add the correction to this pinned comment. :)
✘ I do not engage with corrections comments which are written rudely
✘ If you leave an essay full of corrections, I won’t check it because I have other, better things to do
im sure article 48 grants power to the president to bypass democracy, not chancellor...
@@saahilchhibda Well the chancellor can also pass the laws by decree with permission of the president, as Hitler did.
Hi, i was just wondering where to find the quizlets and practice questions?
@@BellaHoskins Should be in the description :)
Fun fact: Friedrich Ebert used article 48 136 times (good statistic to put in exams)
Another fun fact: The average length of a government’s time in power from 1919 to 1933 was just less than 8 months (also a very good statistic to put in exams)
I’m German and I just love hearing non-German people saying „Reichstag“ I swear my heart melts every time
(Btw I have a history exam tomorrow and I find the English videos about this topic better than the German so I watch them... thanks for making this video:))
i have since ascended to realising that the syllable break is reichs-tag but I spent several years either believing it was reischtag, or after I started learning German reich-stag lol. Hope your exam went well!! :)
yoooo thats awesome she was in sixth form while doing this for us. THANK YOUUU
Happy I could help! :)
i got an 8 thanks to you, youre a legend and i hope you never stop this channel, it's hella useful
Aww pleased I could help! Also congrats!!!!!
yeah i might just be cooked tomorrow, still wondering why on earth i picked history
🫡
you were able to not choose it? lucky
Great video!
Thanks!! :)
this is so helpful, I missed a lot of lessons due to self isolating and I have just been brought up to speed, thanks a lot!!
That sucks, but I'm pleased you're up to speed now!
This video is wonderfully animated, well written and quite honestly underrated. Great job! Please never stop.
Thank you for the lovely comment! :)
history mock tomorrow. "Loving God, I pray that you will comfort me in my suffering...."
These videos are so helpful. Thank you for making them!!!
Aww thanks! Pleased you found them helpful!
Funny how you pronounce Reichstag. I'm German btw
Despite the fact I'm learning German and I know how it should be pronounced, I just physically can't say it!! :)
A long, long time ago...in a galaxy far way, Naboo was under an attack...
(By the way, love how you add humour into your videos, it honestly makes me gain motivation to actually revise XD ).
This is really useful. I’m doing the A Level and my component 2 is Weimar Germany and Nazism. You’re videos have been great for jogging my memory.
Good to hear! :)
I think im gonna get a grade 7 bcause of this video for my mocks
Edit: After a week or so I got my result and I got a grade 6 , thanks for this video you absolute legend
YOU SHOULD MAKE A TEXT BOOK! With these little characters and stuff cuz it’s so cute and acc fun to learn! PLEAZE
Oooh that would be fun lol, one day maybe!
All the best with your gcses exams and I hope you get into a good university.
So helpful for revision for gcse thank you!!!
Hi, I don't live in the UK but I currently have this topic in school, thanks for helping me a out. This video was great!
Thanks!! That's awesome that you found my video useful! Which country do you live in? :)
How do u make video's, they are so cool!!
This is such a underrated channel
Thank you! It's a mixture of drawing, fcp x and motion for the visuals :)
Will you do A-Level topics too?
Btw, your videos are quite useful
Haha thanks!! I have plans to do a revamp of the 'Modern Britain A level Podcast' thing that I released the first episode of ages ago, and you might see some Tsarist and Communist Russia content on this channel at some point - those are the two topics I do at A-level (AQA), so there will be some A-level stuff - hopefully that stuff will be of use to you? :)
@@Alonglongtimeago Very useful indeed. Thank you for the alacrity of your reply.
@@pawal0220 I just learnt a new word 😆
ndotokuda zvekutodaro . Ramba wakadzvanya😍
I appriciate how you do not smack your lips while speaking unlike other historians on the issue on TH-cam. Makes it much more pleasent to listen to.
You’re back!!!
Yes I am!! :D
Thank you so much, helped me with my Year 10 course.
Hi i have a question on Article 48. Does the article state that the Chancellor can bypass the parliment in a time of crisis or is it the President? Im looking at different sources and different ones say either the chancellor or the president. Which one is the correct one?
The chancellor bypasses parliament by going through the president off the top of my head
@@Alonglongtimeago hello, I have checked very many sources including many igcse textbooks. It's the president who bypasses the parliament. Please do recheck your sources as this will create many confusions. But thank you for your videos, you are god sent❤❤
You joke now, in a decade every government will be a Pokemon based confidence and supply deal
This isn't a joke, that was genuine video footage of Weimar coalition governments in negotiation, I'll have you know!
Thank you so much for this, your video and recap of information is very helpful for my exam tomorrow.
This cleared my confusion from class, thanks
Thanks for this video I did I got an A on my analytical paragraph thanks to this. Keep up the good work!
Bro my teacher is OBSESSED with stresemann that we even have a cardboard cut of him😭
Bahhaaahahaa your teacher needs help lol
President is directly elected or indirectly elected ????
Directly if I remember correctly
I don't do history anymore, and a teacher killed it for me i was thinking of just writing anything in the test but when I watch your videos you made history better for me and I feel like I did really well. Thanks
Shame about your teacher, but that's good to hear that you don't feel that way anymore! Good luck on results day!
@@AlonglongtimeagoI got a six, which is actually good considering I spent my first year getting shouted at and sent out of classes
@@marveljames4256 It defo is! Congrats!!!!!!! :D
Just found you via your collab with UsefulCharts. Great channel, although I think there could never be enough history channels here on youtube for my satisfaction. Subbed! Greetings from Germany! :)
Thanks! I'm pleased you found me! And I agree on the matter of the number of history channels. I've had an influx of German viewers recently (the 3rd largest proportion of my views in the last 28 days, after the UK and US), which is pretty awesome (especially as someone who is attempting to learn the language)! :)
The voting age during the Weimar era was age 20, not 21. That fact is stated quite clearly not only in the Weimar Constitution, but in William Shirer's wonderful book on the Nazis, The Rise And Fall In The Third Reich(1960; Shirer's masterpiece).
Just had a quick look and you're right. Because these videos are primarily aimed at helping people with their GCSEs, the info here was stripped from a GCSE textbook - so presumably this originated as a typo in the textbook. :)
@@Alonglongtimeago 👍👍👍👍👍 😁😁😁😁😁
Thanks for the great video! I'm german and I wanted to see an english vid cuz I know my classmates gonna copy lots of stuff from german videos about it lol.
Pleased you like the video and apologies for butchering the pronunciation (my German is much improved since then). Also I like your thinking going for and English vid! :)
I'm in love with your voice ❤️
anyone know what “open to exploitation” means? does it just mean that’s it’s open to be taken advantage of? pls help!!!
very informational thanks
Good to hear!
hi i was wondering if you can explain the extend of support for the weimar constitution? i am doing a level history and i am a bit confused
I'll be honest, everything you need for GCSE is in this video, but I don't know this topic to an A level standard because I didn't do it at A level, so I can't really help you. Sorry :(
Weak, but fluctuates at time. The golden (gold plated, in the words of Indy Neidell) years of 1924 to 1929 were a lot more stable.
It was also not necessarily opposition to the constitution itself that drove some people away, but some principals in general. The Communists for instance believed it was a continuation of bourgeois democracy that only benefited capitalists, and their form of democracy was to elect councils which could be recalled and where delegates were bound by the people or councils which elected them, and opposed the president as a substitute Kaiser.
Support waned as people looked to the people in particular who governed and who you thought governed and disagreed or agreed with each character with power. It had major institutionalization problems.
You missed the importance of article 25. The Reichstag could repeal the laws passed via article 48, but article 25 allowed the Reichspräsident to dissolve the Reichstag, with new elections having to be scheduled after a maximum of 60 days if I remember correctly.
The combination of both allowed the Reichspräsident to rule for those periods basically on his own.
On these videos I only include what's on the GCSE curriculum because they're intended first and foremost as revision resources
Shes alive!!
I surprise even myself! :D
proportional representation "sounds" good
I'm interested - what would your choice of voting system be then? Would you be for first past the post over proportional representation? Are you a fan of direct democracy instead? Or, idk, are you a monarchist?
@@Alonglongtimeago perhaps some version of an open primary to settle on 2 candidates, then first past the post (plurality).. perhaps. idk.
Interesting... I'd personally still lean towards PR over first past the post, despite its problems, simply because it's more democratic. :)
@@Alonglongtimeago Is it though? I suppose from a simplistic viewpoint it is. But the instability of PR comes from its acknowledgement and encouragement. of radical extremes, left and right, which are marginalized under pluralism (as they should be imo)
@@Alonglongtimeago btw really glad you're still investigating "the interwar period". keep up the good work
I watch these in my history class with mr Sykes
history mock tomorrow, counts towards our actual teacher assessed grades... absolutely shitting myself
Hope it went well for you!!
@@Alonglongtimeago grade 7!
On 2:12 ye it says it is in a tree tree bc it is a tree tree bc it is a tree tree 🌳 it is a tree tree 🌳 it will take you out to your trees 🌲 your grass tree 🌲 is your trees 🌲 tree tree and green tree tree trees are you ready and we will see what they do with them for help please 🙏 it will give
my guy, u alright?
@@Alonglongtimeago Ik I got problems :(
@@Alonglongtimeago I can’t control it
using this for year 8 term tests
Hope your year 8 term tests went/go well
I personally think that putting an unpopular and weak ragtag republic in power of a country fresh out of a war and fresh into an economic crisis, mountains of debt and a memory of a better life under a strong leader (the Kaiser) will always be doomed.
Democracies never do well under crisis, especially when they're unpopular, and with coalitions in power no one really feels represented, which opens room to radicalization.
A democracy is a good system for a politically and economically stable country, but never for situation which require quick resolve and action, loke war or an economic recession.
This is why the best course of action for Germany at the time would be putting Wilhelm II back in power, at least symbolically as a popular figurehead, and then, after the crisis is over and a grounds for a stable economy has been built, is it a good idea to lessen the his power and give more to the elected government.
Now, of course, I have the power of 21st century hinsight, but the fact remains that if a moderate Kaiser remained in power, even just symbolically, most people would have stayed infinitely more loyal zo him than a radical, populist would be dictator like Hitler.
Wouldn't you agree that monarchism is even more fun in the 21st century? Tee hee...
I think you make some good and interesting points. As the mega anti-authoritarian that I am, I find myself jarring at your suggestion of putting the Kaiser back in power, but at the same time I can see the point that it would have perhaps brought about enough stability to then later bring in a democratic government - and the Kaiser would be the lesser of the two evils. The argument then would be over how you would then implement a democracy, as monarchs are notoriously not keen to give up their power, so it generally requires a violent revolution like the English Civil war. Such a revolution would again create instability, so perhaps reimplementing the Kaiser may have simply delayed the rise of a fascist regime (who knows? we can only speculate). Ultimately, I would place the largest amount of blame in the hands of the treaty of Versailles, something outside the control of the Germans - so the reimplementing the Kaiser may well have been the best thing they could have done. The other possible option that comes to mind would be communist revolution - I'm not too well versed on the KPD but as far as I'm aware, they were Marxist-Leninist, a way of achieving communism which in my eyes is extremely likely to end up in a horrific authoritarian regime like that of the Soviet Union. But if we had seen a successful communist revolution (as in one that achieved actual communism - 'a classless, moneyless, stateless society' and not what the Soviet Union called 'communism') that would have been pretty interesting.
A long, long time ago... a constitutional monarchy could’ve worked perhaps. Generally these forms of government tend to be the most stable, and a perfect balance between democracy, and stability.
@@Alonglongtimeago Well perhaps the balance of poqer would be in the power of the German nation, although I doubt the Great powers would allow that level of authonomy. The forceful abolishment of the Crown was like a final stroke to the cultural identity of the Germans, spitting in the face of everything Bismarck had fought for in the very creation of Germany. When the people lose a strong leader at a prosperous time and has their morale completely crushed time and time again, they inevitably will start looking for a new identity, a new strong leader, a new golden age, and, of course, someone to blame. The national socialists provided exactly that.
Also, I am convinced a communist takeover in Germany after WW1 is virtually impossible. The old systems and ideals weren't abolished by the people at will, rather they were taken from them forcibly. Even after a lost war most still held conservative and strongly religious ideals completely incompatible with communism. In their shoes, the return of the idyllic times of the Father of the nation, the Kaiser, the patriotism, family values and prosperity was not going to happen by outright shedding any remaining contact they had with their previous identity and culture. After all, no one wants to see the radical communists finish what the Allies started with the Versallies treaty. Of course I'm not speaking of all Germans here, but certainly the majority
Bottom line, when traditional values and symbols are forcibly removed, a traditionalist society would do anything to get them back. Anything.
hi does your nazi germany playlist include most of the course
Unfortunately not- it currently has very little of the course. :( Hopefully one day it'll have the whole thing!
Thank u for this vid
thank you a lot muchas gracias kiitos paljon cảm ơn bạn rất nhiều
Got an 8, thanks for the videos
Congrats!! And pleased you liked the videos! :D
thank you!
You sounds like Vespa (Eva Greene) from the first james bond movie, casino royale
YESSSSS THAT CHANCELLOR IS A LEGEND
CLAP FOR THE KING.
CLAP!!!!!
Do I spy another Stresemann stan? :)
@@Alonglongtimeago there is a good german documentary about him: th-cam.com/video/fLeaVvF1cqo/w-d-xo.html sadl, it's only in german.
the hitler dude popping up had me cackling, thanks for the great video
Video covers alot will try to revise the whole all the topic😁
Proportinal Representation what a word🙌
Have you got any vids of Crime and Punishment?
I do indeed have some videos on Crime and Punishment: th-cam.com/video/x25DfYflW2g/w-d-xo.html
@@Alonglongtimeago thanks have you got any from 1000-1200 or 1200-1500?
@@therealdsd Not currently. The next video I'm going to work on will probably be a C&P 1000-1200, so hopefully that will be useful! :)
@@Alonglongtimeago Thanks mate appreciate it😁
this is democracy manifest
anyone hear the day before their history GCSE lol
Ye I'm so screwed I can't remember much
What actually Weimar republic is
A Constitution Or name of Government....
I am confused a lot
🙏🙏Please answer
It's the constitution, but the government operating under the constitution is often referred to as the Weimar government etc
Thanks
Stand up, all victims of oppression!
If you had the choice to drop a uni which one would it be, I'd drop crime and punishment it's too much for me :(, also random question who is your favourite pokemon?
I would have got rid of the American West if I could, turns out cowboys really aren't that interesting lol. Also pidgeys may be a basic choice but they're very cool imo
Really great video but i lost when you said Reichstag im sorry :)
Yo this was a year ago, I've since figured out that the syllables are split Reichs-tag :)
I got a 5 in history
Congrats!!!!!! 😎
I thought Article 48 allowed the President to rule by emergency decree. Not the chancellor?
If I recall correctly, the chancellor goes through the president to get the emergency decrees passed
@@Alonglongtimeago ohhh. Thanks
sharing with all my friends @kristinahJohn
LOL @ the Cabinet.
THERE IS A MISTAKE
your comment
Good god, that's not how you pronounce Reichstag, you're butchering it. but otherwise a nice video about Weimar republic.
Weimar republic could not remain in that international climate. By 1930 world was changing and the only way large nation could survive was to become and empire of some sort.. Japan attacked Manchuria etc.. so it was doomed
P.S. Wiki has a lot of right pronunciations on historic stuff
upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/f5/De-Reichstag.ogg
Have you ever tried saying an entire sentence in English whilst saying a lone word in another language in the middle of the sentence? It's nigh on impossible not to butcher the pronunciation!
But pleased you liked the video! :D
@@Alonglongtimeago I don't blame you, it sure is hard. I thought it was a joke when you kept repeating it the wrong way.. like haha German language is funny :P but unfortunately it wasn't
@@dezeekat I'm learning German, so I know how it's meant to be pronounced, I just don't have the physical capability to do it!
@@Alonglongtimeago I learned German too! Terrible grammar rules, probably made up by some sadistic people. Maybe one day you'll have the capability to pronounce it, if not i won't hold grudge and Germans lost the war so what are they going to do about it?
"meaty debates"💀💀
The Reichstag will decide your fate
I am the Reichstag
Please tell me my fate, Reichstag
The one person that disliked failed.
Haha, I like your thinking! :D
give
?
And one day for no reason at all.
boiiiiiiiiiz
?
I only subscribed because of this sexy voice that tells history soooo... so.... so well.
My History Teacher play your videos in class.
Your history teacher has good taste :)