Optimising Your MikroTik Layer2 configuration

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 9 มี.ค. 2019
  • Optimising Your MikroTik Layer2 configuration, Jono Thompson (BirchenallHowden Ltd, United Kingdom). This presentation will help you to understand and use the new Layer 2 features that are found in the new bridge settings since 6.41. This presentation will focus on Layer 2 configuration and how to obtain the best performance from your hardware. This presentation will encourage you use the new MikroTik hardware and features correctly. This presentation will also look at some of the issues related to improper use of Router OS Layer 2 features..
  • วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี

ความคิดเห็น • 16

  • @MyAeroMove
    @MyAeroMove 5 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Awesome presentation idea. Not delivered by presenter. Had issues following him.

  • @testo4970
    @testo4970 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great presentation

  • @amateurwizard
    @amateurwizard 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Some of these stories are so scary they should be said around a campfire.

  • @tomasb9483
    @tomasb9483 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Can you give us a link to slides?

  • @nicoladellino8124
    @nicoladellino8124 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice video

  • @gsi87
    @gsi87 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Итог ролика я вижу так: уволить Майка к чертям чтобы проблем не создавал!

  • @bakareoluwatobitimothy6841
    @bakareoluwatobitimothy6841 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Really like your video, liked and subbed...
    However, i will really appreciate it if you can answer how to convert or make an incoming LAN (eg; 192.168.1.20/24 without a VLAN ID) to a VLAN and add it to your trunk in mikrotik.
    The way of doing it in cisco seems easier and clear but not in mikrotik.
    Thanks for your swift and concise response and God bless.

    • @Soda88
      @Soda88 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Assuming you want to do this on a router, put the uplink interface in a bridge with the VLAN you want to trunk, e.g. ether1 - uplink [untagged], ether5 - trunk, ether5.10 [VLAN 10 tagged]:
      /interface bridge add name=br_10
      /interface vlan add name=ether5.10 vlan-id=10
      /interface bridge port add bridge=br_10 interface=ether1
      /interface bridge port add bridge=br_10 interface=ether5.10
      /ip address add interface=br_10 address=192.168.1.20/24
      On a switch you'd simply put your uplink interface on untagged list and set the PVID to whatever you want it to be, e.g. 10:
      /interface bridge port bridge=bridge interface=ether1 pvid=10
      /interface bridge port bridge=bridge interface=ether5 pvid=10
      /interface bridge vlan add bridge=bridge vlan-ids=10 untagged=ether1
      /interface bridge vlan add bridge=bridge vlan-ids=10 tagged=ether5

  • @jimmertzos3967
    @jimmertzos3967 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I am having a hard time following the guy around !!! Rehearsal before a presentation may help him next time.

  • @balajivenkat299
    @balajivenkat299 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    What seems to be evident from the presentation is that MikroTik seems to pass on all the troubleshooting to the user. If I were to buy it off the shelf I must make sure that I understand the internal details such as PVID, Master Interface, Bridging details etc... which remarkably should be hidden details for me rather than nitty gritty details that I must nitpick through. The switch should work off the shelf with a nice CLI that turns on these features automatically and must not lead a user down a fishbone diagram of consecutive steps of the feature NOT working and forcing the user to delve deeper in the nitty gritty of how to get it to work. Unfortunately the vendor seems to be exposing the user to a lot details that ought to be hidden. My 2 cents

    • @geogmz8277
      @geogmz8277 5 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Mmmm.. I really don't have a problem with this approach after all I'm the "Expert" who got the education and gets pay for it. Although I wish documentation wouldn't sucks as much as is right now.
      Anyways.. Mikrotik is not for consumers.. And is important to understand that.

    • @BattousaiHBr
      @BattousaiHBr 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      such learning barrier comes with the low cost...
      you can get stuff that "does" that for you, but it also costs way more.

    • @tcc5750
      @tcc5750 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Sounds like you'd prefer ubiquiti. I prefer Mikrotik but to each their own.

    • @ekatss2620
      @ekatss2620 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Honestly, other than the mess of configuring VLAN on Mikrotik, I'm very much OK with this.
      I'd argue that the barrier to entry does hurt the "enterprise" readiness of Mikrotik hardware. As we get more standard hardware and *consistent* configuration options across devices, I'd wager that enterprise adoption will go up. For now, what I see is that SMBs who run on a tighter budget will choose something which is easier to use.
      In the world of enterprises with limited staff and resources, usability trumps features.

  • @grandsator9961
    @grandsator9961 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    he`s a terrible story teller. Nevertheless, he well narrated that vlan topic.