True Grit (4/9) Movie CLIP - Killing at the Cabin (2010) HD
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 24 ก.พ. 2012
- True Grit movie clips: j.mp/1CLPTQO
BUY THE MOVIE: amzn.to/rQpU8i
Don't miss the HOTTEST NEW TRAILERS: bit.ly/1u2y6pr
CLIP DESCRIPTION:
Chaos erupts after Rooster (Jeff Bridges) interrogates a pair of outlaws regarding the whereabouts of Tom Chaney.
FILM DESCRIPTION:
Fourteen-year-old Mattie Ross (Hailee Steinfeld) joins an aging U.S. marshal (Jeff Bridges) and another lawman (Matt Damon) in tracking her father's killer into hostile Indian territory in Joel and Ethan Coen's adaptation of Charles Portis' original novel. Sticking more closely to the source material than the 1969 feature adaptation starring Western icon John Wayne, the Coens' True Grit tells the story from the young girl's perspective, and re-teams the celebrated filmmaking duo with their No Country for Old Men producing partner Scott Rudin. Josh Brolin and Barry Pepper co-star.
CREDITS:
TM & © Paramount (2010)
Cast: Jeff Bridges, Domhnall Gleeson, Hailee Steinfeld, Paul Rae
Directors: Ethan Coen, Joel Coen
Producers: Ethan Coen, Joel Coen, David Ellison, Megan Ellison, Robert Graf, Scott Rudin, Paul Schwake, Steven Spielberg
Screenwriters: Joel Coen, Ethan Coen, Charles Portis
WHO ARE WE?
The MOVIECLIPS channel is the largest collection of licensed movie clips on the web. Here you will find unforgettable moments, scenes and lines from all your favorite films. Made by movie fans, for movie fans.
SUBSCRIBE TO OUR MOVIE CHANNELS:
MOVIECLIPS: bit.ly/1u2yaWd
ComingSoon: bit.ly/1DVpgtR
Indie & Film Festivals: bit.ly/1wbkfYg
Hero Central: bit.ly/1AMUZwv
Extras: bit.ly/1u431fr
Classic Trailers: bit.ly/1u43jDe
Pop-Up Trailers: bit.ly/1z7EtZR
Movie News: bit.ly/1C3Ncd2
Movie Games: bit.ly/1ygDV13
Fandango: bit.ly/1Bl79ye
Fandango FrontRunners: bit.ly/1CggQfC
HIT US UP:
Facebook: on. 1y8M8ax
Twitter: bit.ly/1ghOWmt
Pinterest: bit.ly/14wL9De
Tumblr: bit.ly/1vUwhH7 - ภาพยนตร์และแอนิเมชัน
Jeff Bridges absolutely should’ve won the Oscar for best actor. Amazing performance.
If he searched the guy's boot and found the knife I would have agreed with you.
If he had chosen any other accent and speech pattern type than "mumbling through a mouth full of marbles" then maybe.
Honestly though his performance in this was mediocre at best, and felt half hearted most of the time.
@@shanem4703
You make a good point about the accent, but he seemed to be doing good work with the _Rooster_ character imo.
At least the Coen's didn't make him sound like an outright buffoon like Brad Pitt in _Inglorious Basterds._
Agreed 100%. I always hated westerns. Until I saw this one.
@@shanem4703do you think drunks speak clear.
I think it is because it is so brutal and realistic, add to the fact that it happens really quickly and it just leaves you stunned.
Coen Brothers are masters at this. Their films, hell even No Country for Old Men, aren't exactly jam packed with violence. But the violence isn't taken lightly compared to your typical PG-13 blockbuster movie where thousands of indiscriminate henchmen are blown away.
I love the way that pistol was loud as a cannon inside the small cabin.
Absolutely! This scene caught me off-guard good.
The beauty of this scene, he was on his blind side.
Oh wow never noticed that the first time
Probably why it took him a couple of seconds to draw. If he'd been on the ball he'd have drawn the moment he went for his boot and drilled him when he came up with the knife.
I never would have thought of that. Awesome catch.
Even though its only a movie it annoys me he should of had his hand on his gun as soon as he turns aggressive and pay attention
Issstari sometimes with those kinds of cuts in the movie with close shots, I feel (or at least rationalize to myself) that they’re happening at the same time. Rooster getting shocked and jumping up happened at the same time the man hollered and got stabbed
I remember seeing this scene when I was younger and I was so scared because of how brutal and realistic it is.
Yea, that gunshot is a lot louder in the theater or even on your TV.
Same
check out 3:10 to yuma (christian bale / russel crow movie)
@@alakazoom87 that movie is far from realistic tho. I'd say check out Open Range, way better movie
@@Wellington-nl7vm Bro said "Nah a movie where a guy unloads 15 shots from his peacemaker is more realistic"
This movie is just gold from start to finish
ClintDempsey76 thing is, it’s not really a remake. Just an accurate retelling of the original source material.
It's okay, slightly overrated imo
Louie Evans Can you elaborate?
@@LincolnClay98 Please elaborate, I am curious
Yes it was.
Dang, I love the Duke but Jeff Bridges brought this character to life. Jeff is an excellent actor, even more an excellent Human being. Thanks to the greats, all the Bridges. They set a standard that can't be matched.
As an actor, Bridges is several orders of magnitude greater than John Wayne. The only character that Wayne ever played was himself - one damned film after another.
For the most part classic westerns were not high art. They were the equivalent of comfort food. Not bad necessarily but not high art. Classic westerns were about cranking out as many films on as little budget as possible. All you need are some actors, old style buildings clothing and sets and the unspoiled American West.
Part of the Reason Westerns don't get made as often as in the past is there is not as much of the "unstained west" as their used to be. Plus lots of old buildings are gone or built around by modern buildings.
@@MrChickennugget360 like the Marvel / Comic films of today lol
@@zenmanalex7548 meh. marvel films are based on decades of tweaking stories and character archs. not some dime store cowboy bullshit.
@@Mewted Except they are for...children.
"I'm sorry, there's nothing that can be done for you; your partner has killed you and I have done for him."
Alonzo Branson So what you're saying is, "I'm fucked".
The offer of comforting words in the final moments...
They didn't sugarcoat the truth in the 19th century.
@@TheWonderfulWino His only comfort was looking forward to heaven, which he mentions.
This is the best Random Encounter in Red Dead Redemption.
"I am puzzled by this. Why is she here?"
This was a great movie.
2:03 When I lose a game of poker in Red Dead
Smith Wesson same
Smith Wesson fact
Facts
2:00
when I lose a game of five finger fillet
@@senoirbougie8876 Lmfao
Same dialogue as the John Wayne movie, but this is much better, darker, and authentic.
its like a middle ground between a john wayne film and Hateful 8
Also filmed in a place that actually resembles the setting in the book. The Wayne movie was shot in northern New Mexico.
Much truer to the book
The “ugly stick” line though, doesn’t make sense here, and Quincy is too old.
"I'd call that bold talk..."
Seriously, this was a dull and monotone attempt. It should never have been done, but that his career survived it, let alone won accolades is a testament to Bridges ability, not the film itself.
Aw, you cut off the best part, Rooster's nonplussed "God dammit."
I know! It makes this scene 10x better.
"Just shot my last witness in the face...welp, I guess we're back to square one."
not to mention "I can do nothing for you, son. Your pard has killed you, and I've done for him."
"Well that escalated quickly."
His scream is how I scream when I see a bug in my room.
That's me when I find the food im looking forward to eating the most when I get home is gone.
Brendan Gleesons young lad..jeez he's some skill with the accents
I thought that was Domhnall Gleeson! For an Irish actor, he does a great job with that Civil War era southern draw. Totally cool.
I love that look at the end, there. That's the face of a man who regrets what he just did. He reacted %100 and totally on instinct. There was more they could have got out of Quincy, but when you see a man coming at you with a knife, you don't stop to think about what you're doing. Also, Moon is played by Domnhall Gleeson...I never even realized.
Nah, that's not regret that's GRIT. He saw the "animal" jump out of dude and responded appropriately. No need to second think it at that point, it's the wild West.
@@bOmBAsTiK Having grit doesn't mean you're stupid. He knows he can't interrogate a dead man
cringe
The look said nothing of that sort.
That wasn't regret lol. This was disappointment. He had no other option.
I shouldn't be laughing at that scream. But that actor nailed it so well!
Déjà Vu. I was just thinking he would be a good Vincent Van Gough.
Lewis Cranston My God, you're right!
Domhall Gleeson is a fantastic actor.
I prefer the original version of this scene just because I don't like the way the actors played it that got killed.
“AAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH”
With a lot of movies using cuts and closeups or slowmotion, this guy getting plainly shot in the face in one scene is more special..
Same here... saw that in he theater & my first thought was... Wow! Great scene!, followed immediately by my second thought, which was, How in bloody hell did they make that look so real!!
It's all fun qnd games until someone gets shot right in the face.
@@redcaddiedaddie The blood and gunshot are most likely CGI. Even with blanks, firing at someone's head that close can kill them.
People don't give CG effects enough credit. They are all over your favorite movies and have been for at least the last 20 years. A good channel to take a look at would be Corridor Digital; they are VFX artists who break down effects and stunts in movies.
@@straysheep4467 I'm sure you're right- thnx for the clarification!
"Tryna git at me."
Don't you mean trying to
Grit at me?
Wit' the truth.
That...was the most badass thing I have ever seen at the end.
Shooting a guy in the face is the most badass thing you have ever seen? You set the bar pretty low.
Would be better if it was everyone with an anime profile pic. But hey, he will settle. 😘
@cookiemonster9 I agree with him. There's nothing special about it to me personally but it's totally subjective.
@cookiemonster9 lol
To be fair. He was trying to get at him
Jeff Bridges did this role a damn good job. Those my age loved Wayne's original but also appreciated Bridge's more "realistic" take.
"Who worked you over with the ugly stick?" Fantastic movie.
"Don't you act a fool!" Great last words.
Most realistic gunshot scene of all time. Everything worked perfectly. The flame and smoke were superimposed because otherwise the actor would have been blinded by them. The blood was already on the wood behind him in the shadow. Some frames were removed to speed up his lurch back from the gunshot. It just came off as super real.
There are always mistakes, usually blood doesn't appear like that, and there would be a hole in the wood, and the shot would be a loud pop.
How the h*ll can you tell about the blood and the superimposed lighting?
@@bryanmcneil9872probably heard it from a commentary track on the DVD or something
"I'm puzzled by this....whats she doin here?"😆
that scream ... i dont think hed even make a sound so fast but it was an alarm that set the scene running
i like how him cutting off his fingers brought no reaction until the guy got stabbed
I saw this movie in theatre when it came out and I immediately thought that it was a masterpiece.
That scream though...
"I can do nothin' for ya son'. Coldest line in movie history.
One of the best westerns ever made
Dat scream tho
The actor playing Quincy is just superb...
The look he got when he got his fingers cut off!!!!!! DAM PRICELESS. BAHAHAHAHAHA
And that scream you think he really chopped his fingers off....lol
Sets him up for an easier kill.
The chopping off the fingers was randomly, shockingly, hilariously superfluous. All Quincy had to do was stab him, but for some reason chose to chop his fingers off first, lol. Very emblematic of the Cohen Brothers style, to remind us that humans are just silly and we are all part of a divine comedy.
He was fat and seated and needed leverage to stand since he was cuffed. He can get that leverage by lodging the knife on the table and using it as a lever. Why just do that, when you can lob off some fingers in the process?
@@ColonBurns Chopping off his fingers was a good way to get him to stop talking immediately. He stabbed him because he didn't want him to tell Rooster that they were going to be there soon. Except Rooster already figured that they weren't too far away, because he saw how much food was being cooked, enough to make bowls for several people. Same with the case of whiskey, it was clearly more than was needed for personal consumption. So it was really just to illustrate his stupidity, that he was protecting what he thought was a secret, that Rooster had already deduced. At that point, Rooster was just trying to figure out exactly when they would be there, whether it's very soon or hours later.
Wasn't funny
greatest remake of all time.
I usually don't like remakes but this one is excellent. And the girl playing Mattie Ross isn't obnoxious to the point of turning it off.
Jeff Bridges did a great job in this movie
Wish he would do more John Wayne movies
He really tied that movie together
Oh yeah? Well that's just like, your opinion man....
Dude.!!
Yo mammy did a great job in our movie.
As shocking as the original was with Wayne and Darby, this one was even more so. Both really great movies.
the original was great this ehhh
@@johnsavoy980oh please, this is thousand times better than the original.
You don't have a clue do you, @@everythingisawesome2903
Were you dropped on your head ,Bridges just doesn't have it, He thinks being so cliche' is good acting, it's not., Beau is a better actor than Jeff, Jeff would be nothing if not for his father Loyd@@everythingisawesome2903
no it's not@@everythingisawesome2903
WOW this was PG-13? I mean don't get me wrong this was a great movie but.... damn
The objection to "some intense sequences of western violence *INCLUDING* disturbing images" is as a sterner warning for easily disturbed people, despite the PG-13 rating.
It's another good example of how absurd the MPAA rating system has become and why it should be completely abandoned.
Alan Falleur That is like arguing *Dead Presidents* should be again rated NC-17. My despise against the MPAA is not like that.
Esteban Hernandez What do you dislike about the MPAA rating system?
I think it's completely absurd because most people don't read the fine print, and even if they do, who is to say what's intense and what's not. Why is western violence more or less difficult to endure than fantasy violence or plain vanilla violence? Some movies are extremely disturbing without any sort of violence and sex.
Alan Falleur Well, as I put it, I state I dislike the rating system because, for example, while they are stricter for most of the time, they treated Sam Raimi as dog-turd over the fact being he released *Evil Dead 2* as "unrated" after that movie originally got an X (pre-NC-17) meaning ONLY adults could see it. As the MPAA's act of revenge, *Army of Darkness* was slapped with an R rating which, to me, pretty much stands for retarded for heavily tame films like *There Will Be Blood* while an R rating was NOT for AoD's head decapitation.
This movie surpasses the old one in just about every way
Just finished reading the book after watching the movie. Damn what a story. Quick read too. Go get it y’all
"who worked you over with the ugly stick"
That's like the pothead calling the kettle a crackhead
That deserves a "heh" and nothing more
This movie was amazing. In every sense.
I can't believe this clip scene didn't show when Rooster said. "God dammit" after shooting the fatso.
true
General Hux, always getting beat up.
Reaction time is priceless 😂😂
Hailee Steinfeld is incredible in this movie very period accurate.
You know everyone on set laughed after the take of Gleeson screaming
I know I wasn't laughing when I watched it
I cannot believe they didn't run the clip through the best lines "I can do nothing for you, son. Your pard has killed you, and I've done for him." Great, great lines.
I just realized now that poor fellow who lost his fingers is Domhall Glesson. Damn
Man, this scene was pretty grisly. I'm surprised this movie got away with a PG-13 rating.
You're trying to get at me.
I would just rubbed it in.
Me:man they ain't just going to cut it off. They will saw it off slowly dam could you imagine the pain.
"How many men have you shot?" Rooster: "Shot...or killed?"
"12.....oh and those 2 other guys....so about 23"
My favorite is the beginning when she haggled about the horses. She’s great in that scene
I love when she goes back and he says, "wait, are we negotiating again...?"
As a man with peripheral vision in the same eye, I know how Rooster feels
I prefer this movie to the John Wayne version. One of the Ono instances where the remake is better than the original
That headshot was damn brutal
I swear people haven't seen worse movies when it comes to gore..
What was your fav scene?
@@colemanwalsh7477 I love me some gore. I just meant that throughout this movie you don’t see much violence, then BOOM! Rooster shoots him in the face so hard he slams into the wall.
@@melissag1364 lol i see what you mean and to be fair I've never saw this movie.. I actually do now cause it looks good and kurt russles in it who has played in some of my favorite movies of all time and was the inspiration for one of my favorite game characters of all time
@@colemanwalsh7477 You’ve made the classic mistake - That’s Jeff Bridges, not Kurt Russel. I confuse them all the time lol.
The US Marshall face after shooting the guy in the face is like "Jesus Christ, where the hell did we step on?"
I remember going "HOLY SHIT!!!" when I first saw this in theaters. In the face! IN THE FACE!!!
Damn... the way that revolver fired off... like a bolt of thunder.
I didn't expect this kind of violence when I went and saw this years ago. Shocked the hell outta me. I loved it though. I hope Clint Eastwood directs one more Western before he throws in the towel. I want to see what he can do with this 21 century movie tech.
Your wish is granted!
@@vengeancegauloise6049 Yeah, true, but the movie isn't very good.
PG-13 movie too.
@@vengeancegauloise6049 cry macho? It sucked
FYI this movie was directed by the Coen Brothers, not Clint Eastwood. Eastwood did “Unforgiven”.
Absolutely loved the dialogue in this film
"You Don't Remember Nothin' I Wanna Know...Do Ya Quincy?"
Salute to my hometown, Wagoner, Oklahoma ("Wagoner's Switch" as mentioned in the cabin scene as the sight of the Katy Flyer robbery) .
Why'd you cut before the best line?! "Can't do nothin for you, son."
Not to mention that was rather shocking. He wasn't ready for that. Reaction times in emergency situations are rarely, if ever, perfect.
He didn't see the knife, only the kill, it was on his blind side.
if you watch slowly you'll notice Rooster's gun wasn't cocked when he fired.
What did he say before? "If it ain't cocked it don't shoot."
I love the scorch marks left by the point blank shot
Love this movie’s gunplay. Very heavy.
Can you imagine how loud that damn Colt peacemaker was in that little cabin? All I woulda heard when the guy on the ground was dying was “weeeeeeeeeeeeee”.
Murdering your accomplice right in front of Rooster - BAD IDEA!
I don't know why but I find this particular scene very disturbing. I mean, the movie showed about forty other people dying and I didn't think anything of it. For some reason this is the scene that gets to me in my dreams. :-\
It’s been seven years since you posted h the is comment... have you thought about this scene recently?
It's the shock of going from a casual, almost non-confrontational scene of an old man eating out of a bowl with a child standing next to him....to an all-out murder and defensive shooting.
@@ingleringlet-snipps3rd449 That's just how the wild west was, and much worse. No cameras, no phones, no DNA, help was always hours or days away, which is as good as no help. A truly smart outlaw would have been virtually uncatchable, because if you don't know who did something, you don't know who to chase, but that's also why outlaws were often soo brazen, because most of the time they could just get away with crimes without ever being caught, until they finally were identified, and at that point there was no point in being more careful about your identity.
The irony is it's also almost no different today even with all of our modern technology. Over 90% of all crimes go unsolved. Even if the police can get to you in 5 minutes, you could be dead by then 10 times over and the killer gone in the wind. We live in an illusion of modern safety.
That's also why they were quicker to punish people with little evidence or for just being a vagrant in the area. You didn't want to be some traveler without some kind of alibi, otherwise you could be sentenced for something you didn't even do. But at the same time, that reality kept everyone in their place, kept most people nice and polite enough most of the time, and it also didn't hurt that most people were armed too. There were some checks and balances in place. So in many ways, we're not much safer today from criminals than people were in the wild west. The punishment rate for crimes committed was likely even higher back then than it is today, so in a sense society was actually overall safer. For every criminal in prison today, there are a thousand other crimes that go unpunished.
Rooster has a reaction time of 4 seconds lmao
That sofkee was missing some sausages.
SodaPrezsing sofkee is hominy, pozole in Spanish. meat? a hambone, if you been by the Wharton place.
idk why but this scene is hilarious
Gaw the way he rocks back after that shot! visceral.
One of the few cases where a remake was better than the original. John Wayne's portrayal was just another john waynr cowboy movie. This movie was a beautiful story.
Absolutely
WRONG
Absolutely. @@bOmBAsTiK
I disagree
2:04 BOOM HEADSHOT
More like faceshot. Caved it right in.
Ambassador still works fine to me lol
Just like read dead
No that was a face shot pol
Dang Mattie Ross always just tells it like it is haha.
I grew up on the John Wayne version and have much respect for it. Obviously the directors did as well because this movie is nearly a copycat in terms of dialogue especially this scene. It’s done exactly the way it was in the old one it’s just Jeff Bridges brings a much more darker ruthless attitude for rooster. And the Coen brothers as well.
the beauty of the scene is his mustache great mustache
A great movie . Watch it multiple times
So beautifully edited
I have to watch this again. I have the blue ray. It's a classic.
One of those rare instances where the remake is soooo much better than the original.
no
That escalated quickly. I mean that really got out of hand fast.
And that's what getting shot "at close range" looks like. Kudos to the makeup guys and technical director for putting powder burns on Moon's face.
Like so:
“He only noticed my approach when my pistol was within a foot of his head - and an instant later, I pulled the trigger and blew his brains out of the back of his head, and the coarse red-gray spray splattered on the floor of the room he had come from.
He seemed to stand there, his eyes gone 'white' with a small black-edged hole between them, and *the tableau of his face entirely coated with a grimy dotting of powder-soot;* and I shoved him hard in the chest, such that he flew backwards for several feet while I quickly drew the door closed. The lock clicked under my hand, and I turned to rejoin the others.”
This was written about a year or so before the movie came out. While I have not shot any people, I *have* fired black-powder revolvers (at targets).
I can so see John Goodman in this scene.
Pretty violent for PG-13.
Not really
Mad is correct. The PG-13 movies started to get more tame during the late 90s. Anaconda was one of the last violent PG-13 films.
Lol thought this was R rating.
@Mad Shangi Pretty sure temple of doom was the first pg-13 movie. Or I might have been the movie that started the idea of pg-13
@HonestDave You're wrong. Temple of Doom was ONE of the movies that started the idea of PG-13, but the real first PG-13 movies was *_The Flamingo Kid_* , even though it wasn't released into theaters until after several other movies. 1984's *_Red Dawn_* , although NOT the first movie to receive the rating, was the first to be released into theaters with the rating.
Bit of trivia: Neither of the Coen brothers ever saw the John Wayne version. They read the book and wrote the screenplay from there.
Yah, those two pretentious idiots LOVE claiming that they've "never even heard of" the material they're aping. Like when they claimed "Oh brother where are thou" was based on the Iliad and the Odyssey, then claimed they'd never read either of them. What's kind of hard to understand though is: why exactly would they remake "true grit" if they'd never seen "true grit"? And why did they copy parts of the movie that aren't in the novel?
@@VideoHostSite This guy was slightly wrong in the fact that they hadn't seen it. They saw it as young children and not since then. They wanted to make a faithful adaptation of the novel instead of just remaking the original. They don't include stuff from the original other than when Rooster grabs the reins of his horse and puts them in his mouth to shoot the guys towards the ending with two weapons. They actually cut out stuff from the original movie, like getting rid of Rooster's cat, and changed small details from the novel, such as during the hanging scene. O Brother, Where Art Thou was only based on the Odyssey. They hadn't read the epic, but something everyone pretty much knows about, and they mention it, is it's storyline. You can know the basic gest of a story such as the Odyssey and still make a overall original movie around it.
That “ugly stick” sure does get around…
He was caught off guard and was late to the draw and he knows it . The sound on that gun (2:03) is epic , big 44 blackpowder pistol sounds just like that , the more you overload powder ,it it gets crisp as you break the sound barrier , My Remington would also had a high pitched ring if you max loaded it with pyrodex.
I've always wondered what the point of protecting Ned was when this dude had to know that Rooster was going to blow his brains out once he attacked his buddy. Did that dude just think that Rooster was going to shrug it off as he stabbed his buddy to death?
He wasn't thinking. He was acting out of pure rage because of misbegotten loyalty to Ned and his partner betraying that "loyalty".
I thought the same thing initially, but settled on the fact he knew he couldn't kill Rooster so out of a sense of loyalty shut up the one who was about to rat.
'You always was dumb Quincy"
Even criminals hate snitches.
well that escalated quickly.
1:59 General Hux when they find out he's the spy
“I don’t like you. I hope you go to jail. My lawyer will not help you.”
“Who worked you over with the ugly stick?”
Some movies should never be remade….this is one.