Wow, you guys triggered the heck out of some people in the comments here. It seems just reading "systemic racism" sets them off, never mind that it's mainly about a time period where everyone should agree that those were racist times in America.
@@unvergebeneid he wasn't giving you a history lesson, he was vouching you advice. And yes, for the most part, the revolutionary racial identitarians who now spout crap like 'systemic racism' are Marxists.
Some folks like to believe that they simply have " merit" and that they had no help getting to where they are, or that communities that are attacked on all fronts yearly should just get over it.
Systemic racism is a terrible term. If you were trying to fix racism you'd be making a sincere effort to convince people by using honest words that are already well-understood. Just say ubiquitous instead of systemic. But you can't because that would reveal how absurd most of the accusations are. It's funny how redlining is always mentioned in videos like this because it's one of a handful of examples of systemic racism that was actually systemic (the plantation system, voting before the 60s, but also things like exclusion of blacks from businesses in the south which was ubiquitous but not systematic). Most of the rest either aren't systemic or aren't racist. Just look at it: even the most prestigious scientific journal on Earth just fell for the idea that greenery is part of systemic racism. I'm sorry but only a moron or a conspirator refuses to figure out that _richer areas having nicer canopy cover_ is a norm that exists in all societies. Science magazine is either dumb or corrupt if they think that phenonemon is a part of racism or is even predominantly about racism. But they represent "rich people having more plants" as part of a racist structure and not the other way around (which is obviously true). That reversal is the lie I'm talking about. You're so obsessed with fighting racism rather than ending it that you're going to create even more racism just so you can fight it, and today's discrimination will just set us up for more discrimination tomorrow. You stop lying you creep.
The video gives accurate examples of the disparity between the conditions under which people of different races are likely to live. It does effectively address the fact that similar disadvantages are endured by the poor white and it certainly does not analyze whether racism is systemic or emergent.
Look at your history books. White black asian wtfe republican party has always been the party to legislate and protect the rights of all races etc. The democratic party has ALMOST ALWAYS lost their fight to stall these human rights. Republicans used to be considered the radical party until well after it was established and always favored the freedom of any individual. If you feel like you need more individual freedom, probably republican. If you prefer a government with limited power, republican. If you want a powerful fed, dem, if you want to enforce laws not represented by the people, dem. If you want to support the same party that fought for the continuation of slavery, segregation, no black votes, then be a democrat. My education was split between two schools of primarily black and hispanic students and these schools were overcrowded. I faced more adversity because of the color of my skin than i ever faced being homeless for 3+ years. The system i live under gave me food stamps. If thats white privilege can i please switch to being black?
@@Notthatguy23 Look guys! This white guy struggled therefore white privilege isn’t a thing. I also ate breakfast this morning, so world hunger does not exist. “My education” clearly you weren’t paying attention when someone was trying to educate you.
Thank you black people are literally being gentrified out of areas. Manhattan Beach in Cali aka Bruce Beach belonged to a black couple until the land was stolen. Central park etc etc all belong to black people. Skid row is literally full of black people.
In this comment section we find people whose feelings are so hurt by this title that they can't even watch a 4 minute video -- people who reject information, people who don't even know what red-lining is.
What's interesting is the audience this video reached, and the audience it didn't. While the video makes a connection between urban planning and environmental stressors, it doesn't bring up racism as the title promised.
@@difflocktwo Ok, I realize this is a 3 yr old comment, but here I go anyway: redlining is racist. Sectioning off areas based on skin color is a racist practice, and demarking them as undesirable due to the skin color of the inhabitants is racist. The video explores how the impact of racist city planning is hurting and killing people today. It's environmental racism. This entire thing is rooted in racism and the video spends all its time explaining it.
"Researchers delved into dozens of studies" That doesnt make it science. Corrilations from 50 years ago dont prove causation then and especially not 50 years after the fact.
@@unvergebeneid Sorry to hurt your feelings, but the Sokal Hoax and the Replication Crisis are not one-off problems that will go away. Even the useful fields like psychology have become ideology factories. Is there even one remotely useful piece of work that has oozed out of social sciences in the past couple decades? I suppose it's nice to finally know the equation for determining whether a person is racist or not: Are you white? You racist. And if it wasn't for social sciences, we wouldn't know that original sin is a real thing! Who knew, the Catholics were right all along!
@@toobnoobify I personally know and worked with a lot of social scientists, none of which worked on race or anything and all of which used very solid methodology. So your blanket statement seems ill-informed. As for the publication crisis: yes, there are issues within those fields but it were social scientists who uncovered them, so it's all part of the process. Let them do their job. Also, let's not forget that medicine has a huge problem with publication bias as well. Is the whole field of medicine therefore "non-science" in your eyes?
@@unvergebeneid _"Is the whole field of medicine therefore "non-science""_ Medicine is objectively science, it is one of the real sciences where theories are tested and reproduced and have value to society. Comparing social science to hard sciences is like comparing the usefulness of Tonka trucks with dump trucks. There are certainly serious issues with science today. The corporate influence you alluded to being a big one, even the value of the peer review system in general is questionable. But the problem with social sciences is that it's not science, it's the codification of ideology. Serious question: Name one useful thing that has come out of the social sciences in the last couple decades?
@@nathanjonsson6467 I'd like to agree, but this issue is a direct result of people putting laws into place that were to limit black people, these laws now dony just effect black people any more though.
@@nathanjonsson6467 I'm agreeing with you lol, I'm saying that these laws now that were put into place to harm black people still disproportionately harm black people. But, it effects all poor people
I’m not black nor I’m white….this is happening all around the world… It’s hard work to get out of poverty and only few are willing to sacrifice. if you blame slavery in America and how do you explain there were no slavery in Africa yet the conditions are Similar…People are different in understanding their surroundings and thought process….
“Human Geography” it shows the difference in the environment and different parts of cities due to the impact of segregation and old laws which still have an effect today.
It shows a correlation between some social phenomena, and proposes a cause-effect relationship. Just as any science model. Watch, search relationships, propose hypothesis, test hypothesis.
@@haidagwaiiintel7696 well, I think following a scientific method is already science, no matter what you are analizing. Plus I am an architect and we have studied similar situations in my country. Whenever income and race are asociated, the rest follows naturally, even if architectural planning and racist laws are or are not applied. Ghettos tend to appear naturally if the city is not organized actively by laws that prevent social inequalities, and sadly most politicians do not care about that, and so most cities have their ghettos and poor areas. So to sum up, it's not the race that makes the ghetto, but the racist society and (lack of) laws (against it). And even this last sentence is kinda wrong, because it is not race in the beginning, but the aporophobia that is usually related to racist ideas about foreign workers. Nobody is truly racist against rich people, no matter their skin color...
@sports Redlining was banned, yes. But we should not pretend that cause and effect doesn't exist. Redlining may be banned, but it explains a lot of the racial inequality we see today. 3 out of 4 neighbourhoods redlined back then still struggle economically today. Something as huge as redlining obviously has major effects on society, and simply banning it doesn't just automatically fix the inequality it created, that's sadly not how the world and economics seem to work. Especially when there are still a lot of people alive who lived when redlining was legal, and struggled because of it.
Unfortunately academia is being hijacked by political activists and has been going that way for years. You can get any old bollocks published in journals if it sounds 'woke' enough. That's how we ended up with feminist glaciology.
sorry that it upsets you that they’re covering actual issues that really shouldn’t even be labeled as “political”. It’s not like they’re talking about our planet and how key areas are targeted and effected. Grow up
I think this would be a wonderful opportunity to pause for a moment and give thanks for the great contributions of the black community to our society. Their peaceful and generous nature makes them ideal neighbors, lending testimony to their exceptional family values and parenting skills unrivaled by any other culture. Their child-rearing practices and skills mixed with their unparalleled work ethic are second to none. Their rational and logical thought toward circumstances coupled with their innate capability to de-escalate situations is to be envied and coveted. Their commitment to academic excellence enriches our schools and serves as an example to all who hope to achieve prominence as a people. Real estate values are fueled by the mix of African-Americans into an area due to their caring and respectful nature of these communities, an example of all they have achieved through their enthusiasm for self-improvement, hard work and a self-reliant nature. Without their industrious and creative drive, we would be poorer as a nation.
@@AkiraIsMissing Because there are black high rank politicians, military generals, superstars, millionaires. We have minority rights, protection, affermative actions. System is not built to keep any race down.
Honestly, scientists putting an academic title on this video was simply a wrong choice. These people are too uninformed to be able to comprehend big words
Divisive. America is not as bad as you are trying to make it. It remains one of the best places in the world to live. For all people. That is why people of all races from all countries want to come here.
It's only divisive to people unable to accept truth. People come here because of the oppression and devastation that we cause worldwide, through the military or politics.
@@BLK-LA If there is a place where I am hated and kept down because the system is against me, I'm not moving there. America is better than these other countries you refer to. Period.
Poverty knows no race. But it can live in a culture. The Irish indentured servants were little better than slaves. The Irish immigrants were hated in America. But they rose above all that and never asked anybody to prop them up. Saying only people of color experience oppressions is racist. Saying they can't succeed without your help is racist as hell.
You could just, I don't know, remove some of the asphalt and concrete. It's a cool history lesson, but there is nothing stopping a community from planting trees. It's not like there wasn't already dirt.
Sounds like a good idea. By any chance are you gonna help plant these trees or provide any donations to help these underfunded neighborhoods? Are you in anyway going to help invest in these poverty stricken communities with helpful needed action or are you just going to make unhelpful comments. Just wondering
@@firstnamelastname-gl6pl Have you ever planted a tree? You make is sounds like it's hard. And it would cost me a weeks worth of tips at Jamba Juice to afford a 6 foot tree (working part time). I doubt an entire neighborhood doesn't have the funds or the time to swing a hammer and plant a tree. Get real. And unlike yourself, I don't have the time or the money to help people lift their own fingers.
@@quinson93 not only do I help environmentally in my community and as a vegetarian but yes Quinson to answer your question I have done more in the last month and a half to help my community and environment than you have in your entire lifetime.
@@quinson93 notice how you didn’t respond to my point and changed your answer. And yes you have time to do so since you live on the planet and it’s almost the bare minimum to help your community. You do a lot more harm than good and the lazy attitude of “I don’t have enough time and someone else will do it” is why this world is so flawed. Get real
Science Magazine needs to reconsider changing its name if they are going post propaganda content such as this. systematic racism should be systematic classism.
@@Pax.Britannica Perfect example,observe how racists tries to end any discussion about racism "racism dont exist guys, we dont need to discuss it, if you talk about racis you're a racist),racist millitants are all over The Internet spreading fallacies and brainwashing teenagers. Even retards that dont understand polítics are reproducing the fallacies
@@gs-nq6mw "Trying to end discussion", I'm not trying to end anything, merely pointing out that you're wrong. I've said nothing on the value or differences between any group or race of people. Only that a when a social movement claims to speak for an entire racial group, they prove themselves to be racial identitarians (racists) who value the group more so than the individual. You claim "Racism is making a comeback" in the form of people like me, yet nothing I've said can be classified as racist. Whereas you (and those like BLM) will openly evaluate a persons value or 'privilege status' based on their racial characteristics. And that is racist.
Institutional racism: Constitution of Liberia Article 27 b. "In order to preserve, foster and maintain the positive Liberian culture, values and character, only persons who are Negroes or of Negro descent shall qualify by birth or by naturalization to be citizens of Liberia."
Hmmm, I wonder if Liberia has any history that would explain the rules and show that it is not racist, but we can't expect you to know that. It's not like America took African land to send its free Black people so they could get rid of the desire to escape or anything. It's not like we have the letters to prove it.
nope, it's just THAT bad where they are. really depressing that this was the conclusion you came to. I hope you're eventually able to see the privilege you must have to push the "pull yourself up by the bootstraps" narrative with a straight face.
You know this is sociology, a social science which means that they are still teaching science. Besides this is a pretty well known and studied phenomenon (which also relates to biodiversity in human dominated areas meaning ecology is also present in here) which makes it as valid as reviewing any other type of science.
Just because the scientific model is used on a social issue doesn’t mean the result is scientifically sound and objective. The same method was done to create the pseudoscientific concept of race to divide humanity and justify slavery and segregation and the holocaust.
@Rafael Ossorio Obviously, it is easier to gather, and be certain of, evidence in the "hard" sciences. Other areas, such as the social sciences are ethically constrained and less amenable to direct, invasive experimentation. Unlike laboratory experimentation, the built environment is a "concrete" demonstration of historic American socio-economic biases. Yes, the Nazis DID use pseudoscience to vilify, and hence scapegoat, Juden. Evidence of their deliberate religio-cultural "final solution" still stands. Claiming that race is a "pseudoscientific concept" does NOT alter the fact that planning authorities --- and the residents of white neighborhoods --- sought to ghettoize those of darker pigmentation. The results remain evident and erosive to the segments of American society that were deliberately oppressed. Unlike politics, the ultimate aim in all branches of science is to improve explanations of realty. In the absence of supportive counter-evidence and logical arguments, those who are poorly-educated and politically-prejudiced rely on DENIAL of FACTS. Pathetic!
Blake Placing groups in ghettos have been done throughout history. In America, it had been done to Jews, Irish, Italians, Latinos, Blacks, Asians, etc. Why do we only examine this past action only on Blacks and Latinos? What is the “special agenda”? Planting trees in the ghetto will not solve past discriminations. You do not solve the race issue in America, which I have stated before is based on a pseudoscience, by using the same false pretense of the concept of race. Pointing out past forms of discrimination on specific groups of American people will not help us to progress within our current situation. It will only seek to divide us as it is doing now. Every American group can claim past oppressions. It is not unique. Current oppressions against groups will subside over time and be replaced by new ones. They are inescapable for every group. The only effective and immediate solution, in my opinion, for minority groups, and ALL groups, are for them to improve their lives on an individualistic level. Improve their moral values, receive an education, whether academic or vocational, be responsible fathers, mothers, sons, daughters, workers, citizens. People need to accept the fact that there will always be people who won’t like them for various reasons including skin color. But if those people are not a supportive influence in their lives, like family and true friends, THEN WHO CARES?! We need to get over ourselves for past discriminations and focus more on what we can do AS INDIVIDUALS to improve our lives and the lives of our loved ones. That’s a big enough task to handle but it can definitely improves people’s reality better than a “scientific” video pointing out past discriminations.
So many people in this comment section need to take a lesson on systemic and structural racism, as well as how policies that are no longer in place can have consequences for many years after they've been deemed illegal. The lack of education and further, lack of willingness to learn, is astounding.
I was waiting for the buzzword....and at 3:45 there it is: Climate change. Yes sure, as if the climate wasn't changing 50 years ago. Every storm and monsoon is now because of climate change...
There is no structural racism in the US. There used to be, but it was corrected with legislation in the 1960s. There are racist people, but racism is not structural. If people here are concerned with racism, they should focus on other parts of the world (China, Middle East, etc.) where there truly is racism today. The US is one of the least racist countries on earth.
As a person of color, should I laugh or cry when reading your last statement? You have no clue what you are talking about. I am in the midwest and I have spent half of my life in the EU. The US, as great as the country is in many ways, is still a VERY racist country. Not blatantly obvious as in the 60's, but underground, oh yes it is. And I have witnessed it.
@@Nordic_Sky I don't think I have to go personal here, but here is an example: When I get pulled over by cops in Germany, I never have to fear for my life. When I get pulled over by a cop in America, I am scared. Is this structural? No. But is it realistic? Hell yes. If everything was executed within the books of law, you are right, America is not a racist country. Except that in the real America, it doesn't work that way. I think I have lived in more countries than you, my dear...
@@mathisnotforthefaintofheart The Washington Post’s database of fatal police shootings showed 14 unarmed Black victims in 2019 (most recent data). There are about 7,300 Black homicide victims a year, the vast majority killed by other Blacks. The 14 unarmed victims in fatal police shootings would comprise only 0.2% of that total. Is this what you're afraid of?
@@Nordic_Sky Let me help you with that logic- I’d there is no structural racism, why does this country fear reparations for the black community that were destroyed by racists, huh? Pay up and bring the wealth that were stolen from them. I bet you will dismiss that as well.
In modern America, systemic racism takes many forms. A good example of modern systemic racism is showing preference in college admissions to people of color even when their test scores are lower than those of white or Asian people.
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 I want to laugh or cry, my brain is numb from all the stupid. I have traveled around the world and I have never image this would be part of Science magazine.
So much of this narrative fails to acknowledge the role people have in affecting their own environment and the value of the property in which they reside and, thereby, affect. SE Washington is the poorer side of the city. It's relative affordability for low-income folks is directly correlated with the fact the property values are depressed by high crime, poor educational environments, and a disregard for maintaining the community. People that live in these areas can change the trajectory of their community by demanding higher valuing of the community by its residents, demanding the students go to school and learn, without disrupting, and supporting community policing. In essence that's what gentrification does; it brings people in that value community, demand responsibility from their neighbors, have standards for the children, and support policing. It's not skin color that causes this phenomenon, it's culture. Frankly, there are plenty of examples of Black families leaving this communities for the very reasons I've cited. They don't want to live among the miscreants and malcontents either. You want more trees? Plant them. You want less asphalt and more green spaces? Move to the countryside. High-density, low-income housing necessitates more concrete and asphalt. It's not fiscally possible to sustain a low-income community as a low-density community. It's interesting to note that the only culture that seems to be rooted in these communities for multiple generations are multi-generational US citizens. Migrants pass through these communities in one or two generations and then move on the greener pastures. That includes first generation Caribbean and African immigrants, as well as Chinese, Koreans, and Vietnamese. How do they find the path out? They value family, community, and education. They are less likely to engage in crime and accept the challenges of making a success out of themselves. History tells us where our predecessors went right and wrong. I'm waiting for the report that tells us where todays folks are making the right and wrong decisions.
This ignores the history to substitute a modern version of argument that disacknowledges Black oppression and Black death due to racism. Tell me the history of the post-Reconstruction era and how white gangs destroyed hundreds of Black towns. If you don't address that fact you are full of it.
All I can say towards racism is the one fabulous black person you run onto is completely over shadow'd by the next 10 you meet. One in a hundred break the ice first, I'm consistently breaking the ice just to show its not such a bad world if you'll just open up and be a social creature as intended by God, instead of running around causing hate & discontent completely blind to the fact he or she is just making it hard on themselves. It's a good world for all, I haven't got what I want or really need, but I'm not out here taking it out on others as I see the 90% of the black community doing and this my cute friends is a FACT
I think that’s not just black people who are not likely to talk to strangers. I’m not saying that’s right but to use that as an argument as you did is illogical.
@@Gigaamped So you think I just dreamed this sh!t up huh . . . this comment I made comes from everyday dealings with this half-wit group that thinks the world owes them the world ten times over. Most white folk I've discussed this with has had the same results or close to it. I love people and am very social along with being able to read a person's feelings by body language and movements along with facial expressions which is pretty down to earth readings of a person's well-being. So it all has to do with your motives on your response to my comment here. It used to be said that attitude was everything. What causes attitude, is respect. What causes respect is motives. So motives are the bottom lying emotional upswing that causes everything. Everybody needs to get they're motives going in the right direction before heading out in the day ahead of them which will cause pro-active results. PRO-ACTIVE RESULTS MY FRIEND IS WHAT WERE ALL IN-TITLED TO AS HUMANS-BEINGS WHILE OUT AND ABOUT BEING AS HUMAN AS HUMAN CAN BE. . . . WE'RE ALL IN-TITLED TO THIS FAIRNESS BECAUSE I'D LIKE TO THINK WE'RE A NOTCH ABOVE BEING AN ANIMAL AS THE BLACK CROWD MOST OF THE TIMES COMES ACROSS. George Soros invoked or for better words pitted the blacks and whites to do just as your witnessing today. The deep-state global cabal has been trying to drive a widge in-between the great American way for centuries and it's real obvious they've almost done it, but I've noticed of late there seems to be a change in tide as I'm greeting along better with the woke up black crowd as they are starting to see what's going on politically. I love Everybody, let's just all learn to help one another and go forward with greatness for all of us
Maybe at one point in time racism did define economics. But in modern times? Give me a break! Racism wasn't a problem 11 years ago when Obama become President. And I thought by electing Obama America proved how not racist it is.
While I agree with the video, something so biased should NOT be taught at school. A teacher’s job is to provide unbiased information and leave it up to the student to form opinions. All my teachers growing up refused to disclose who they voted for because they knew the power they held. Now, so many teachers and nonpolitical leaders and influencers are fucking that all up.
U like how they presented a point I might agree with and go nowhere with it. It's no secret that people with higher incomes didn't want to live in highly populated areas. If it's racially motivated than good riddance. Youres uggesting that tree coverage is a sign of income inequality and I have one question. Where do you plant the TREES?! Of course an area of lower population density is going to have more room for trees. It's not that hard to go buy a sapling and plant the damn thing. If everyone in a highly populated area just planted 1 this problem would be fixed. If 1% of Harlem planted a $60 oak sapling then there'd be nearly 2000 trees planted. As for there being more asphalt roads in areas of lower income... they live in a City! Where aren't there road...
I agree with this comment so hard. And how expensive would it really be to have this addressed by the state of it’s such a big problem? I’m scouring TH-cam to understand what precisely systemic racism is and only getting some really “half-cooked” results.
Guessing that emotions make some think that science does not matter. Whilst Science is proving that in the US black lives are less important. Should we then impose social and emotional ideals or should we enforce scientific pragmatism? Does Science tell us why racism is inherent to all societies?
I can see this being about 0.000001% of the issue for black Americans now and historically. Although, it was an interesting idea and video, I don't disagree necessarily just don't think it's that big of a factor in wellbeing, the burbs are wack as well.
Wow, you guys triggered the heck out of some people in the comments here. It seems just reading "systemic racism" sets them off, never mind that it's mainly about a time period where everyone should agree that those were racist times in America.
@Leftist Deity Fauci Yes, I'm going to trust a history lesson by someone who uses "Marxist" indiscriminately. Give me a break.
@@unvergebeneid he wasn't giving you a history lesson, he was vouching you advice. And yes, for the most part, the revolutionary racial identitarians who now spout crap like 'systemic racism' are Marxists.
@@Pax.Britannica source on that latter statement?
Some folks like to believe that they simply have " merit" and that they had no help getting to where they are, or that communities that are attacked on all fronts yearly should just get over it.
Systemic racism is a terrible term. If you were trying to fix racism you'd be making a sincere effort to convince people by using honest words that are already well-understood. Just say ubiquitous instead of systemic. But you can't because that would reveal how absurd most of the accusations are. It's funny how redlining is always mentioned in videos like this because it's one of a handful of examples of systemic racism that was actually systemic (the plantation system, voting before the 60s, but also things like exclusion of blacks from businesses in the south which was ubiquitous but not systematic). Most of the rest either aren't systemic or aren't racist. Just look at it: even the most prestigious scientific journal on Earth just fell for the idea that greenery is part of systemic racism. I'm sorry but only a moron or a conspirator refuses to figure out that _richer areas having nicer canopy cover_ is a norm that exists in all societies. Science magazine is either dumb or corrupt if they think that phenonemon is a part of racism or is even predominantly about racism. But they represent "rich people having more plants" as part of a racist structure and not the other way around (which is obviously true). That reversal is the lie I'm talking about. You're so obsessed with fighting racism rather than ending it that you're going to create even more racism just so you can fight it, and today's discrimination will just set us up for more discrimination tomorrow. You stop lying you creep.
The video gives accurate examples of the disparity between the conditions under which people of different races are likely to live. It does effectively address the fact that similar disadvantages are endured by the poor white and it certainly does not analyze whether racism is systemic or emergent.
You're right, it doesn't analyse whether it's systemic. Instead, they assert it.
From 1930 - 1960 redlining was practiced by the FED
Look at your history books. White black asian wtfe republican party has always been the party to legislate and protect the rights of all races etc. The democratic party has ALMOST ALWAYS lost their fight to stall these human rights. Republicans used to be considered the radical party until well after it was established and always favored the freedom of any individual. If you feel like you need more individual freedom, probably republican. If you prefer a government with limited power, republican. If you want a powerful fed, dem, if you want to enforce laws not represented by the people, dem. If you want to support the same party that fought for the continuation of slavery, segregation, no black votes, then be a democrat. My education was split between two schools of primarily black and hispanic students and these schools were overcrowded. I faced more adversity because of the color of my skin than i ever faced being homeless for 3+ years. The system i live under gave me food stamps. If thats white privilege can i please switch to being black?
@@Notthatguy23 Look guys! This white guy struggled therefore white privilege isn’t a thing. I also ate breakfast this morning, so world hunger does not exist.
“My education” clearly you weren’t paying attention when someone was trying to educate you.
@@Notthatguy23 they're really doing a bad job nowadays
Id like them to cover also how gentrification covers these ecosystems
Thank you black people are literally being gentrified out of areas. Manhattan Beach in Cali aka Bruce Beach belonged to a black couple until the land was stolen. Central park etc etc all belong to black people. Skid row is literally full of black people.
@@Mrk3lly in the poorest area of atlanta (bankhead), they're building a townhome community which will go for half a million per unit smh
@@Shucksofficial That doesn't make the community rich, it just means more income streams for the landlord
In this comment section we find people whose feelings are so hurt by this title that they can't even watch a 4 minute video -- people who reject information, people who don't even know what red-lining is.
What's interesting is the audience this video reached, and the audience it didn't.
While the video makes a connection between urban planning and environmental stressors, it doesn't bring up racism as the title promised.
@@difflocktwo Ok, I realize this is a 3 yr old comment, but here I go anyway: redlining is racist. Sectioning off areas based on skin color is a racist practice, and demarking them as undesirable due to the skin color of the inhabitants is racist. The video explores how the impact of racist city planning is hurting and killing people today. It's environmental racism. This entire thing is rooted in racism and the video spends all its time explaining it.
Start with a conclusion, then ram "evidence" into it, and pretend you have created "science"!
Not giving home loans to people who can't afford to pay back the loan... Racism in America is cruel.
We all saw what happened in 2008
oh dear white man not providing enough for the subspecies again 🙄
WS Terrorists destroying Black property makes it hard to pay loans back.
"Researchers delved into dozens of studies"
That doesnt make it science. Corrilations from 50 years ago dont prove causation then and especially not 50 years after the fact.
Nothing in social science can reasonably be called science.
@@toobnoobify 🙄
@@unvergebeneid Sorry to hurt your feelings, but the Sokal Hoax and the Replication Crisis are not one-off problems that will go away. Even the useful fields like psychology have become ideology factories.
Is there even one remotely useful piece of work that has oozed out of social sciences in the past couple decades? I suppose it's nice to finally know the equation for determining whether a person is racist or not: Are you white? You racist.
And if it wasn't for social sciences, we wouldn't know that original sin is a real thing! Who knew, the Catholics were right all along!
@@toobnoobify I personally know and worked with a lot of social scientists, none of which worked on race or anything and all of which used very solid methodology. So your blanket statement seems ill-informed.
As for the publication crisis: yes, there are issues within those fields but it were social scientists who uncovered them, so it's all part of the process. Let them do their job. Also, let's not forget that medicine has a huge problem with publication bias as well. Is the whole field of medicine therefore "non-science" in your eyes?
@@unvergebeneid _"Is the whole field of medicine therefore "non-science""_
Medicine is objectively science, it is one of the real sciences where theories are tested and reproduced and have value to society. Comparing social science to hard sciences is like comparing the usefulness of Tonka trucks with dump trucks.
There are certainly serious issues with science today. The corporate influence you alluded to being a big one, even the value of the peer review system in general is questionable. But the problem with social sciences is that it's not science, it's the codification of ideology.
Serious question: Name one useful thing that has come out of the social sciences in the last couple decades?
Weather and Climate is racist: why is the Sahara Desert in Africa????
At what point should we start holding people responsible for the environments they create for themselves?
At what point do we acknowledge that black people faced and still face economic discrimination in the US economy?
@@indridcole7596 black people having shitty credit is not economic discrimination. Give examples
That’s too much work. Way easier to blame others for your own failures.
@@indridcole7596 affirmative action ?
@@pookiepooh white people spent 300 years keeping black ppl down. it's going to take time to change
I think this is more of classism than racism.
Totally agree, its the working class vs the elites, like it always has been
@@nathanjonsson6467 I'd like to agree, but this issue is a direct result of people putting laws into place that were to limit black people, these laws now dony just effect black people any more though.
@@AkiraIsMissing Yes but these communities can clearly still feel the consecuenses of these historic laws, time doesn't heal all wounds
@@nathanjonsson6467 I'm agreeing with you lol, I'm saying that these laws now that were put into place to harm black people still disproportionately harm black people. But, it effects all poor people
They literally just showed direct evidence of racism through redlining.....
I’m not black nor I’m white….this is happening all around the world…
It’s hard work to get out of poverty and only few are willing to sacrifice. if you blame slavery in America and how do you explain there were no slavery in Africa yet the conditions are Similar…People are different in understanding their surroundings and thought process….
You aren't very smart either if you really think there was no slavery in Africa.
How is this related to Science?
“Human Geography” it shows the difference in the environment and different parts of cities due to the impact of segregation and old laws which still have an effect today.
Maybe watch the 4 minute video and find out? There's plenty of science in there, especially relating to environmental science and ecosystems.
It shows a correlation between some social phenomena, and proposes a cause-effect relationship.
Just as any science model. Watch, search relationships, propose hypothesis, test hypothesis.
Science ~ knowledge...
@@haidagwaiiintel7696 well, I think following a scientific method is already science, no matter what you are analizing. Plus I am an architect and we have studied similar situations in my country. Whenever income and race are asociated, the rest follows naturally, even if architectural planning and racist laws are or are not applied. Ghettos tend to appear naturally if the city is not organized actively by laws that prevent social inequalities, and sadly most politicians do not care about that, and so most cities have their ghettos and poor areas.
So to sum up, it's not the race that makes the ghetto, but the racist society and (lack of) laws (against it).
And even this last sentence is kinda wrong, because it is not race in the beginning, but the aporophobia that is usually related to racist ideas about foreign workers.
Nobody is truly racist against rich people, no matter their skin color...
Guys maybe watch this 4 minute video before judging it because the title hurts your feeble feelings. It's just 4 minutes.
@sports
Redlining was banned, yes. But we should not pretend that cause and effect doesn't exist. Redlining may be banned, but it explains a lot of the racial inequality we see today. 3 out of 4 neighbourhoods redlined back then still struggle economically today. Something as huge as redlining obviously has major effects on society, and simply banning it doesn't just automatically fix the inequality it created, that's sadly not how the world and economics seem to work. Especially when there are still a lot of people alive who lived when redlining was legal, and struggled because of it.
The main determinant.. The presence of foreign born and Black people 😂
They said the part out loud you’re not supposed to say.
Is it me or is this channel becoming political lately?
They released another video over the last month with political overtones.
Unfortunately academia is being hijacked by political activists and has been going that way for years. You can get any old bollocks published in journals if it sounds 'woke' enough. That's how we ended up with feminist glaciology.
there is nothing political here, it is just a rational scientific study that is summed up here.
The cancer is spreading everywhere. Leftist pseudoscience should be exposed.
sorry that it upsets you that they’re covering actual issues that really shouldn’t even be labeled as “political”. It’s not like they’re talking about our planet and how key areas are targeted and effected. Grow up
if this is "too political" for you i don't know what to say
I think this would be a wonderful opportunity to pause for a moment and give thanks for the great contributions of the black community to our society. Their peaceful and generous nature makes them ideal neighbors, lending testimony to their exceptional family values and parenting skills unrivaled by any other culture. Their child-rearing practices and skills mixed with their unparalleled work ethic are second to none. Their rational and logical thought toward circumstances coupled with their innate capability to de-escalate situations is to be envied and coveted. Their commitment to academic excellence enriches our schools and serves as an example to all who hope to achieve prominence as a people. Real estate values are fueled by the mix of African-Americans into an area due to their caring and respectful nature of these communities, an example of all they have achieved through their enthusiasm for self-improvement, hard work and a self-reliant nature. Without their industrious and creative drive, we would be poorer as a nation.
Imagine creating racism and division and then blaming the victims for feeling disenfranchised… you’re truly sick in the head
Thank the Liberals for this.....
Have you ever looked up the word "liberal" in a dictionary?
I love how everyone is so defensive about the existence of racism in the U.S. Anyway thanks for the informative video Science Magazine!
I believe the title of the video was used as click bait to have us watch and argue this topic. Like how I’m doing now. Mission accomplished!!!
Racism do exist but systemic racism doesn't exist in any western country anymore.
@@biologyevolution9989 Neither concept doesn’t exist. They’re forms of virtual reality.
@@biologyevolution9989 Explain how systemic racism doesnt exist please
@@AkiraIsMissing Because there are black high rank politicians, military generals, superstars, millionaires. We have minority rights, protection, affermative actions. System is not built to keep any race down.
Honestly, scientists putting an academic title on this video was simply a wrong choice. These people are too uninformed to be able to comprehend big words
what?
You know you are racist when you stereotype another human being based on the color of their skin. Very sad
Divisive. America is not as bad as you are trying to make it. It remains one of the best places in the world to live. For all people. That is why people of all races from all countries want to come here.
I just made a video on the topic, "What if you woke up during surgery? "
You're right, it's not as bad. It's many times worse.
It's only divisive to people unable to accept truth. People come here because of the oppression and devastation that we cause worldwide, through the military or politics.
@@BLK-LA If there is a place where I am hated and kept down because the system is against me, I'm not moving there. America is better than these other countries you refer to. Period.
It rained on my birthday, it was systemic racism.
Can I publish in Science now?
Poverty knows no race. But it can live in a culture. The Irish indentured servants were little better than slaves. The Irish immigrants were hated in America. But they rose above all that and never asked anybody to prop them up. Saying only people of color experience oppressions is racist. Saying they can't succeed without your help is racist as hell.
There is soooo much history and factors and it's dishonest of you to say that they just "pulled themselves up by their bootstraps" and blacks are lazy
Social ‘science’
What?
I don't wanna live in a black neiborhood
Well, those 10 - 20 car freeways could be redesigned to have large, expansive parks on top.
No Widen the freeways instead. Parks for poor people don’t move commuters into the city and it doesn’t move food into the city
@@LucasFernandez-fk8se Those parks could double as food gardens.
@@LucasFernandez-fk8se lets demolish your house to fit the highway
"We can agree to disagree, but that doesn't mean we have to live with each other".
- Hadouken
You could just, I don't know, remove some of the asphalt and concrete. It's a cool history lesson, but there is nothing stopping a community from planting trees. It's not like there wasn't already dirt.
Sounds like a good idea. By any chance are you gonna help plant these trees or provide any donations to help these underfunded neighborhoods? Are you in anyway going to help invest in these poverty stricken communities with helpful needed action or are you just going to make unhelpful comments. Just wondering
@@firstnamelastname-gl6pl Have you ever planted a tree? You make is sounds like it's hard. And it would cost me a weeks worth of tips at Jamba Juice to afford a 6 foot tree (working part time). I doubt an entire neighborhood doesn't have the funds or the time to swing a hammer and plant a tree. Get real. And unlike yourself, I don't have the time or the money to help people lift their own fingers.
@@quinson93 not only do I help environmentally in my community and as a vegetarian but yes Quinson to answer your question I have done more in the last month and a half to help my community and environment than you have in your entire lifetime.
@@quinson93 notice how you didn’t respond to my point and changed your answer. And yes you have time to do so since you live on the planet and it’s almost the bare minimum to help your community. You do a lot more harm than good and the lazy attitude of “I don’t have enough time and someone else will do it” is why this world is so flawed. Get real
@@firstnamelastname-gl6pl Wow, so you're flexing on me because you're not in poverty? My community gets my support dumb-ass.
Lot's of "biodivesity" on concrete and glass Wall Street, huh? Little in rural Mississippi? This is just propaganda.
Weather is racist
Science Magazine needs to reconsider changing its name if they are going post propaganda content such as this. systematic racism should be systematic classism.
Look at all the unlikes lol
Racism is making a comeback with internet,the "altright" is spreading racist propaganda,conspirations and fallacies 24/7 online
@@gs-nq6mw mate you need help. Seriously, the only way racism is making a comeback, is in the form of racial identiterians who call themselves BLM
@@Pax.Britannica Perfect example,observe how racists tries to end any discussion about racism "racism dont exist guys, we dont need to discuss it, if you talk about racis you're a racist),racist millitants are all over The Internet spreading fallacies and brainwashing teenagers. Even retards that dont understand polítics are reproducing the fallacies
@@gs-nq6mw "Trying to end discussion", I'm not trying to end anything, merely pointing out that you're wrong.
I've said nothing on the value or differences between any group or race of people.
Only that a when a social movement claims to speak for an entire racial group, they prove themselves to be racial identitarians (racists) who value the group more so than the individual.
You claim "Racism is making a comeback" in the form of people like me, yet nothing I've said can be classified as racist. Whereas you (and those like BLM) will openly evaluate a persons value or 'privilege status' based on their racial characteristics. And that is racist.
just shows how many racists there are that don't like the truth
WHO ALL UNDERSTAND PER CAPITA SAY "HELL YEAH"
@@belizetourism1218 HELL YEAH!
Institutional racism: Constitution of Liberia Article 27 b. "In order to preserve, foster and maintain the positive Liberian culture, values and character, only persons who are Negroes or of Negro descent shall qualify by birth or by naturalization to be citizens of Liberia."
Hmmm, I wonder if Liberia has any history that would explain the rules and show that it is not racist, but we can't expect you to know that. It's not like America took African land to send its free Black people so they could get rid of the desire to escape or anything. It's not like we have the letters to prove it.
Yet we have migrants wanting to come here?
so It must not be that bad at all. There’s no excuse if you’re willing to work and save.
nope, it's just THAT bad where they are. really depressing that this was the conclusion you came to. I hope you're eventually able to see the privilege you must have to push the "pull yourself up by the bootstraps" narrative with a straight face.
Other countries aren’t that bad it’s just we do it better. There’s no systematic racism in their countries and they’re just horrible at it.
It’s 2021. There is nothing stopping black people from living where ever they want now. So I wouldn’t say this is a thing anymore.
I remember, when Science Magazine taught actual science.
You know this is sociology, a social science which means that they are still teaching science. Besides this is a pretty well known and studied phenomenon (which also relates to biodiversity in human dominated areas meaning ecology is also present in here) which makes it as valid as reviewing any other type of science.
@@zhilinskysproject5543 exactly
This video has loads of facts just confused why the dislikes.
They can’t put facts above feelings I guess
Right-wingers are snowflakes.
@@haidagwaiiintel7696 the issue is that you can mathematically test if a correlation is true or not with the right data.
Just because the scientific model is used on a social issue doesn’t mean the result is scientifically sound and objective. The same method was done to create the pseudoscientific concept of race to divide humanity and justify slavery and segregation and the holocaust.
@Rafael Ossorio Obviously, it is easier to gather, and be certain of, evidence in the "hard" sciences. Other areas, such as the social sciences are ethically constrained and less amenable to direct, invasive experimentation.
Unlike laboratory experimentation, the built environment is a "concrete" demonstration of historic American socio-economic biases.
Yes, the Nazis DID use pseudoscience to vilify, and hence scapegoat, Juden. Evidence of their deliberate religio-cultural "final solution" still stands. Claiming that race is a "pseudoscientific concept" does NOT alter the fact that planning authorities --- and the residents of white neighborhoods --- sought to ghettoize those of darker pigmentation. The results remain evident and erosive to the segments of American society that were deliberately oppressed.
Unlike politics, the ultimate aim in all branches of science is to improve explanations of realty. In the absence of supportive counter-evidence and logical arguments, those who are poorly-educated and politically-prejudiced rely on DENIAL of FACTS. Pathetic!
Blake Placing groups in ghettos have been done throughout history. In America, it had been done to Jews, Irish, Italians, Latinos, Blacks, Asians, etc. Why do we only examine this past action only on Blacks and Latinos? What is the “special agenda”? Planting trees in the ghetto will not solve past discriminations. You do not solve the race issue in America, which I have stated before is based on a pseudoscience, by using the same false pretense of the concept of race. Pointing out past forms of discrimination on specific groups of American people will not help us to progress within our current situation. It will only seek to divide us as it is doing now. Every American group can claim past oppressions. It is not unique. Current oppressions against groups will subside over time and be replaced by new ones. They are inescapable for every group. The only effective and immediate solution, in my opinion, for minority groups, and ALL groups, are for them to improve their lives on an individualistic level. Improve their moral values, receive an education, whether academic or vocational, be responsible fathers, mothers, sons, daughters, workers, citizens. People need to accept the fact that there will always be people who won’t like them for various reasons including skin color. But if those people are not a supportive influence in their lives, like family and true friends, THEN WHO CARES?! We need to get over ourselves for past discriminations and focus more on what we can do AS INDIVIDUALS to improve our lives and the lives of our loved ones. That’s a big enough task to handle but it can definitely improves people’s reality better than a “scientific” video pointing out past discriminations.
Oh hey, they said Black people and not POC. good video.
amazing, guess they decided to be honest for a change.
@@MrTimeless101 That makes no sense whatsoever.
Who cares?
@@guiltyuntilproveninnocent. are you slow or just pretending?
@@TheDarkAdventure Wanna elaborate on that comment?
So many people in this comment section need to take a lesson on systemic and structural racism, as well as how policies that are no longer in place can have consequences for many years after they've been deemed illegal. The lack of education and further, lack of willingness to learn, is astounding.
What a crock of crap
Progressive propaganda? This is so- disappointing!
really issnt
Fascinating, and highly objectionable.
Even if we were to ALL agree (which I don’t) to call this systemic racism, what are the solutions then?
See South Africa, AKA Wakanda modern paradise
You could google that if you cared to find out about addressing this
@@baptizednblood6813 ah, I get it. You don’t know either.
I was waiting for the buzzword....and at 3:45 there it is: Climate change. Yes sure, as if the climate wasn't changing 50 years ago. Every storm and monsoon is now because of climate change...
Both my comments got censored.
There is no structural racism in the US. There used to be, but it was corrected with legislation in the 1960s. There are racist people, but racism is not structural. If people here are concerned with racism, they should focus on other parts of the world (China, Middle East, etc.) where there truly is racism today. The US is one of the least racist countries on earth.
As a person of color, should I laugh or cry when reading your last statement? You have no clue what you are talking about. I am in the midwest and I have spent half of my life in the EU. The US, as great as the country is in many ways, is still a VERY racist country. Not blatantly obvious as in the 60's, but underground, oh yes it is. And I have witnessed it.
@@mathisnotforthefaintofheart What is your best example of structural racism? If it's everywhere, this should be a simple question.
@@Nordic_Sky I don't think I have to go personal here, but here is an example: When I get pulled over by cops in Germany, I never have to fear for my life. When I get pulled over by a cop in America, I am scared. Is this structural? No. But is it realistic? Hell yes. If everything was executed within the books of law, you are right, America is not a racist country. Except that in the real America, it doesn't work that way. I think I have lived in more countries than you, my dear...
@@mathisnotforthefaintofheart The Washington Post’s database of fatal police shootings showed 14 unarmed Black victims in 2019 (most recent data). There are about 7,300 Black homicide victims a year, the vast majority killed by other Blacks. The 14 unarmed victims in fatal police shootings would comprise only 0.2% of that total. Is this what you're afraid of?
@@Nordic_Sky Let me help you with that logic- I’d there is no structural racism, why does this country fear reparations for the black community that were destroyed by racists, huh? Pay up and bring the wealth that were stolen from them. I bet you will dismiss that as well.
it's not racism. it's being able to pay your bills on time.
It's racism.
Lets Go Brandon
No.
In modern America, systemic racism takes many forms. A good example of modern systemic racism is showing preference in college admissions to people of color even when their test scores are lower than those of white or Asian people.
Aren't Asians people of color?
So then work harder, do better, and move to the better part of town.
"Science"
"Useful" comment.
Next week,how cow farts are racist.
To say that weather is racist........ is extremely stupid..
More vegetation = more cover. Rules of the jungle.
We all share the same environment. I call bs on bs. Thought this was a science channel. I guess not.
th-cam.com/video/_KfklILeNZg/w-d-xo.html
Interesting how it is science until you don't agree. Guess your opinion is more accurate than research then.
Ignore the dismissive, hateful comments. They didn’t watch past 1:20.
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 I want to laugh or cry, my brain is numb from all the stupid. I have traveled around the world and I have never image this would be part of Science magazine.
" Science magazine "
Have you ever heard about Social science?
So much of this narrative fails to acknowledge the role people have in affecting their own environment and the value of the property in which they reside and, thereby, affect. SE Washington is the poorer side of the city. It's relative affordability for low-income folks is directly correlated with the fact the property values are depressed by high crime, poor educational environments, and a disregard for maintaining the community. People that live in these areas can change the trajectory of their community by demanding higher valuing of the community by its residents, demanding the students go to school and learn, without disrupting, and supporting community policing. In essence that's what gentrification does; it brings people in that value community, demand responsibility from their neighbors, have standards for the children, and support policing. It's not skin color that causes this phenomenon, it's culture. Frankly, there are plenty of examples of Black families leaving this communities for the very reasons I've cited. They don't want to live among the miscreants and malcontents either.
You want more trees? Plant them. You want less asphalt and more green spaces? Move to the countryside. High-density, low-income housing necessitates more concrete and asphalt. It's not fiscally possible to sustain a low-income community as a low-density community. It's interesting to note that the only culture that seems to be rooted in these communities for multiple generations are multi-generational US citizens. Migrants pass through these communities in one or two generations and then move on the greener pastures. That includes first generation Caribbean and African immigrants, as well as Chinese, Koreans, and Vietnamese. How do they find the path out? They value family, community, and education. They are less likely to engage in crime and accept the challenges of making a success out of themselves.
History tells us where our predecessors went right and wrong. I'm waiting for the report that tells us where todays folks are making the right and wrong decisions.
This ignores the history to substitute a modern version of argument that disacknowledges Black oppression and Black death due to racism. Tell me the history of the post-Reconstruction era and how white gangs destroyed hundreds of Black towns. If you don't address that fact you are full of it.
White people create racism and division, then blame the victims (blacks) for how their lives turn out... cant make this stuff up.
All I can say towards racism is the one fabulous black person you run onto is completely over shadow'd by the next 10 you meet. One in a hundred break the ice first, I'm consistently breaking the ice just to show its not such a bad world if you'll just open up and be a social creature as intended by God, instead of running around causing hate & discontent completely blind to the fact he or she is just making it hard on themselves. It's a good world for all, I haven't got what I want or really need, but I'm not out here taking it out on others as I see the 90% of the black community doing and this my cute friends is a FACT
you off a perc or sumn
@@99usernamestaken
You blind a perc or sumn
I think that’s not just black people who are not likely to talk to strangers. I’m not saying that’s right but to use that as an argument as you did is illogical.
@@Gigaamped
So you think I just dreamed this sh!t up huh . . . this comment I made comes from everyday dealings with this half-wit group that thinks the world owes them the world ten times over. Most white folk I've discussed this with has had the same results or close to it. I love people and am very social along with being able to read a person's feelings by body language and movements along with facial expressions which is pretty down to earth readings of a person's well-being. So it all has to do with your motives on your response to my comment here.
It used to be said that attitude was everything. What causes attitude, is respect. What causes respect is motives. So motives are the bottom lying emotional upswing that causes everything. Everybody needs to get they're motives going in the right direction before heading out in the day ahead of them which will cause pro-active results.
PRO-ACTIVE RESULTS MY FRIEND IS WHAT WERE ALL IN-TITLED TO AS HUMANS-BEINGS WHILE OUT AND ABOUT BEING AS HUMAN AS HUMAN CAN BE. . . . WE'RE ALL IN-TITLED TO THIS FAIRNESS BECAUSE I'D LIKE TO THINK WE'RE A NOTCH ABOVE BEING AN ANIMAL AS THE BLACK CROWD MOST OF THE TIMES COMES ACROSS.
George Soros invoked or for better words pitted the blacks and whites to do just as your witnessing today. The deep-state global cabal has been trying to drive a widge in-between the great American way for centuries and it's real obvious they've almost done it, but I've noticed of late there seems to be a change in tide as I'm greeting along better with the woke up black crowd as they are starting to see what's going on politically. I love Everybody, let's just all learn to help one another and go forward with greatness for all of us
@@brian5606 yeah
This is not true. If it were true we would have done a better job of it.
Rich and money can afford...
LMFAO
Haha what a joke
Yes, you are.
Great explanation
lol
Maybe at one point in time racism did define economics.
But in modern times? Give me a break! Racism wasn't a problem 11 years ago when Obama become President. And I thought by electing Obama America proved how not racist it is.
Nonsense.
Test
Fascinating stuff
Teacher making us watch this rn
What school? Won't mention your name when I report it to the School Board.
What school?
Brainwashing in progress.
Good
While I agree with the video, something so biased should NOT be taught at school. A teacher’s job is to provide unbiased information and leave it up to the student to form opinions. All my teachers growing up refused to disclose who they voted for because they knew the power they held. Now, so many teachers and nonpolitical leaders and influencers are fucking that all up.
U like how they presented a point I might agree with and go nowhere with it.
It's no secret that people with higher incomes didn't want to live in highly populated areas. If it's racially motivated than good riddance. Youres uggesting that tree coverage is a sign of income inequality and I have one question. Where do you plant the TREES?! Of course an area of lower population density is going to have more room for trees. It's not that hard to go buy a sapling and plant the damn thing. If everyone in a highly populated area just planted 1 this problem would be fixed. If 1% of Harlem planted a $60 oak sapling then there'd be nearly 2000 trees planted.
As for there being more asphalt roads in areas of lower income... they live in a City! Where aren't there road...
I... not U...
I agree with this comment so hard. And how expensive would it really be to have this addressed by the state of it’s such a big problem?
I’m scouring TH-cam to understand what precisely systemic racism is and only getting some really “half-cooked” results.
This is a great example of why America needed, and still needs, President Trump. Thank you, science!
As always Trumpers miss the assignment
Lmao I'm sure you'll enjoy corporation tax cuts and increase taxes on everyone that makes below 75k per year. The tax increase won't end until 2027.
Lmao systemic racism
lol karens
You have authority over nothing and nobody.
Buwshit
I just made a video on the topic, "What if you woke up during surgery"?
Yaha its hypocrisy .
Talk bad @ INDIA relegions and keep mouth shut in there own countries racisum.
Hypocrisy of western world
Guessing that emotions make some think that science does not matter. Whilst Science is proving that in the US black lives are less important. Should we then impose social and emotional ideals or should we enforce scientific pragmatism? Does Science tell us why racism is inherent to all societies?
I can see this being about 0.000001% of the issue for black Americans now and historically. Although, it was an interesting idea and video, I don't disagree necessarily just don't think it's that big of a factor in wellbeing, the burbs are wack as well.
NIQQAPLZ