I've seen many of the examples of LEGO rule-breaking. In nearly all of them, there is no issue. No rules broken; just users misinterpreting the instructions. The placement of the single stud brick onto the gear offered in the thumbnail is a good example. If one spends a few more seconds analyzing the image, it's clear that the the brick is meant to mirror the other single stud brick already in place, situating it behind and below the gear. It's not even a printing error. It's user error.
@@chimerasofhafgufa Look closer. The arrow is indicating the desired position of the brick; it's pointing to the void just visible beyond the gear. No riddle solving involved; just requires better observation skills.
These videos aren't really about them breaking rules, right? It's just printing errors; no rules being broken. I thought it would be about sets that use illegal connections or break LEGO's rules about sets.
4:43 i remember getting a sticker on a lego firetruck set perfectly put on, exactly dead center, and exactly straight, and i swear to god i did this, i remember how impressed i was with getting that sticker on like that
Star Wars sets officially have the lightsaber hilt rotated so that the side with the four extremities is on the bottom. The circles go on top, and that is where the blade goes.
That's what I was thinking. I was expecting a list of Lego sets, that include weird and unusual constructions (for example builds, that puts stress on the pieces).
Old polish catalogs were a gold mine for errors like those, especially in the translated set descriptions. My favourite one was propably the description for the original Slave 1 from 2000. It mentioned Jabba the Hutt and his name was translated as "Chata Jabba" which literally means "Jabba the hut". Hut, like a small house :x
As someone who had sets with the older style instructions as a kid, I never found them difficult to follow, so I don't see why people complain about them so much. I remember when Lego started changing instruction styles, and I absolutely hated the then newer style that had increased boldness in the outlines, which especially made Technic instructions more of a pain to read.
Yes, older Lego sets were for children, not whiny adults. As a child, you rotated the piece, found out that the only logical way is to put it there, and you went on... If you build a Lego set nowadays, half of your build time is turning pages. In the older days one page showed nearly every new piece that is (more or less) visible from that specific viewpoint on the picture.
@@lilbill7385 There is actually a section specifically for replacing pieces. Generally it's free and done, if you need a lot of peices (or maybe you abuse it) they may require a proof of purchase. Years ago, around 1998, there was a number you called, boy did I use it to get cool pieces from sets I didn't own. I did it for a while too, never got denied or charged.
There was once a few years back that my family bought a Christmas themed lego set for our lego Christmas village. And when we opened up the box we found out that bag (3 or 4) was missing from the box. So we returned it and apparently there was some sort of production error and apparently each and everyone of those sets had bags missing. Thankfully they got in a new shipment the day we went there to return it so we were able to pick up a new copy of the set. Good thing we have only had this happen once! 😅
cool tip, if you place the star wars droid body on backwards you can then add a lightsaber beam piece, or fire piece to make it look like the droid got shot
The thing I hate about stickers are the ones which overlap multiple bricks. Makes it really difficult/annoying when demolition of something to build again.
A few years ago, I got a nexo knights set, the siege machine of doom thingy, I think it was called, but at the back of the 2nd instruction booklet, it had a page showcasing all the characters you could get in the same wave of sets, but all the names were messed up. Axl was labeled as “lance”, clay was labeled as “Aaron”, and so on.
That last one: i have build with the old instructions style when i was young and now i build with the new style. What is wrong with paying attention and learning 3D visualisation while having Lego fun???? New style instructions are a waste of paper and ink with soooo many steps only involving one piece after one piece after one piece, it’s insane and minddumbing!!!
And additional to the 1-step instructions the box says: "to build this set you need to be at least 25, have 15 years of experience, a degree and a grown up to help you"
Very much agreed! I noticed this also in reviews of the latest Technic sets, where even the tiny 42116 Skid Steer Loader with just 140 parts has over 60 pages of instructions. I still wonder how on earth I ever could have successfully built the big 8865 Test Car back in the day as a 10 year old kid from instructions in just 24 steps. The booklet has just 36 pages in total for the A-model, a B-model, _and_ instructions how to motorize that B-model. It's pure madness!
I had an old Exo-Force set when I was a kid, and the cover to the instruction booklet was inverted from the rest of the pages. Probably just a simple case of the papers got flipped around during assembly, but still funny to remember.
11:49 the droid has a 2nd error. The left arm is "upside down". It doesn't really matter a lot but I guess the thicker end should be the shoulder as it is on the right arm.
Well actually it's just being more in a natural position, if you're holding something with your hand your wrist will be like 90° turned. I don't think this was an error
@@shitmanlore it's not about the turn of the "hand" on his right hand but about the thick end of the left arm. They habe the thick and as hand and the thin one as shoulder. There is no turn. ;-)
I found a phantom arrow on page 103 of the Lego TV from the Nintendo set 71374. The yellow arrow continues on the pages as far as as you can see it, until a piece covers where it was. Also on the same booklet on page 186 and 187 it shows the wrong printing for the red shell brick. I would like to see a part four, that would be great!
On the 6:14 one, I think I know what happened: The top left set is correct, and has a reasonable price of $40, but the bottom right one is now a 4+ set, with an incredibly cheap price of $10. There is a juniors set smaller than this set but with a similar theme, so the catalog designers just put that image there because the set names were too alike. That’s just my thoughts.
Not a disagreement, the pommel has vertical ridges, and the rings around the center column go towards the blade. Modeled after Obi-Wan's saber if that helps.
I FOUND A SET THAT BREAKS THE RULES!! In the LEGO Creator Space Rover Explorer, set 31107, on page 213 step 3 its has you lay down 6 pieces 2 pages later on page 216, it instructs you to lay down those exact same pieces again despite the pieces already having been layed down, there is no where else for the pieces to go since they are already on the set and the previous pages image is the exact same as the one it is instructing you to add pieces to!
I've had this LEGO set that had a lot of mistakes! It was the LEGO movie 2 statue of liberty one and the art work on the box on the back shows you that the bottom floor has a coffee shop and the coffee shops floors are gray but when I open the box the floors and pieces are suddenly brown and I've seen videos talking about it to! Also on the instruction book there is an arrow that is just hanging there.... A Phantom Arrow!
It's interesting that Lego box *with offset printing error* might actually be more wanted collector item than the box with perfect print. For e.g. baseball cards, the card with fully *correct* printing are so rare that they are the collector items.
The only 'incorrect set' I can personally remember is a walking AT-AT that my friend had been gifted. For whatever reason, an entire set of leg pieces was literally melted into a plastic blob. Not one whole blob, but several individual blobs. He couldn't ever finish the set because of this, as the replacement part service hadn't started yet or was poorly advertised, and ended up giving it to me since I had more Lego than he did. Heh.
Also in the new 2020 lego Star Wars Final Duel set there is a mistake in the manual that shows Darth Vader without arm prints even tho the actual mini-figure does.
Lol “Double LEGO Set” I still have that catalog, actually looked up which one had the correct set pictured too, the one with the lower price was like a hotdog stand or something like that iirc
13:50 this is exactly why I always thought that mega bloks/mega construx had better building instructions since they made the pieces you put on the build their standard color and the previous steps were dimmed for ease of understanding where pieces go.
The lego 18+ crocodile train from 2020 instructions is very hard to follow due to the brown pieces on the black background. Please include this in part 4 if you are making a part 4
Imagine being the editor at Lego and editing all these images. They think ah one small error, no one will notice. Then every little microscopic error you made gets published in a TH-cam video for everyone to see.
I remember a LEGO Power Miners set, the mech from the lava theme, having a sticker put on upside down on the box and it always irritated me as a kid haha
HONOURABLE MENTION: I own the AT-ST set and there's also a different problem: The AT-ST's driver's helmet in the parts list has no printing, even though in the box art and set is a printed helmet.
It's not just the torso that's wrong in the instructions for building the battle droid in the Droid Gunship set. They also have you place the left arm upside down, with the thicker shoulder clip being portrayed as a hand for some reason.
I think for the diver, the grey on his arm is like chain armor, like if you went diving with sharks you would wear some armor in case if a shark bites you. This is just what I think and I don’t know if it’s the true reason
👍 *Leave a LIKE if you enjoy the video!*
• Watch another episode in this series: th-cam.com/video/BvgrKtU19pA/w-d-xo.html
spitbrix:lego makes makes mistakes also spitbrix:yes this chapter sohuld be call Lego City Fairy
Hello
Hhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiijiiiiiiiiiiiiii I love your videos and can you find the J?
@@natashaliddard9032 found it
@@natashaliddard9032 I did two
The Mandalorian is going to be very confused when his blaster shoots his leg
Lol
Double LEGO Set?
Lol
BRUH XD
Spoiler for Episode 15: The Tragedy
I was so sad when his ship the Razorcrest was blown up, however I hope we get a new Slave 1 set for it
When building sets, stickering took me the longes, because I wanted it PERFECT
Not just you want it perfect
@@balazs8379 I feel like alot of people want it perfect. But even then we all still screw up because the stickers are SO damn small sometimes
Ah yes,longes, a mix of long and ages lol
@@Xiodot yes. Because it will take long for people of all ages lmao
If you have a brick separator use the flat corner to pick up the sticker and place it, makes it MUCH easier
I've seen many of the examples of LEGO rule-breaking. In nearly all of them, there is no issue. No rules broken; just users misinterpreting the instructions.
The placement of the single stud brick onto the gear offered in the thumbnail is a good example. If one spends a few more seconds analyzing the image, it's clear
that the the brick is meant to mirror the other single stud brick already in place, situating it behind and below the gear. It's not even a printing error. It's user error.
in the new taj mahal i got an extra bag of 1x1 studs
it's a design error, you dont draw an arrow pointing to the gear and expect everyone out of thousands of your customers to solve a riddle
@@chimerasofhafgufa Look closer. The arrow is indicating the desired position of the brick; it's pointing to the void just visible beyond the gear. No riddle solving involved; just requires better observation skills.
EXCELLENT SPITBRIX WORK.
These videos aren't really about them breaking rules, right? It's just printing errors; no rules being broken. I thought it would be about sets that use illegal connections or break LEGO's rules about sets.
Same here
This comment is underrated
Clickbait it is...
yea
Ditto
"what's wrong? why aren't you playing with your new lego set?"
"THE ARMS OF THE MINIFIG ARE A DIFFERENT COLOR THAN IN THE INSTRUCTIONS"
Idk
4:43 i remember getting a sticker on a lego firetruck set perfectly put on, exactly dead center, and exactly straight, and i swear to god i did this, i remember how impressed i was with getting that sticker on like that
OMG YES A PART 3!!!!!! SO HAPPY YOU ARE DOING A REGULAR SCHEDULE OVER CHRISTMAS!!!!!
Probably
Why are you leaving a comment that sounds like it was done by a 3 year old
How can you be excited about this?! THIS IS VULGAR!!!
The 169 like
Nice
12:14 are we not going to talk about how that diver looks scared to death before putting his helmet on?
ERROR
No
TF im stuck in a ad
@@lingqintu8098 BEGLUA
Star Wars sets officially have the lightsaber hilt rotated so that the side with the four extremities is on the bottom. The circles go on top, and that is where the blade goes.
I’d also like to point out that the left arm on the droid from the droid gunship set is flipped. The wider end is the shoulder, not the hand.
"Sort of like a shadowy-color"
You mean black?
@@Handwritinghelp I was talking about a color, not _people_ of color
@@Handwritinghelp also not all dark skinned people are African American.
@@Handwritinghelp I guess I fell right into your trap then
But wouldn’t black lego pieces have a white outline like every other black lego pieces in lego sets?
@@autisticChronicles360 that's a good point. I haven't bought a lego set in years so I forgot
Breaking the rules does not mean printing errors
Right
That's what I was thinking. I was expecting a list of Lego sets, that include weird and unusual constructions (for example builds, that puts stress on the pieces).
Ok cool
Then don’t watch. Sheesh
@@Himanboy bruh I had to watch it to find out it was misleading..
"Sort of, like, a shadowy color"
Hmm, you know I could swear there's a name for that color.
ye i thnk it's blunk, not sure tho
Looks kinda pink to me idk.
Old polish catalogs were a gold mine for errors like those, especially in the translated set descriptions. My favourite one was propably the description for the original Slave 1 from 2000. It mentioned Jabba the Hutt and his name was translated as "Chata Jabba" which literally means "Jabba the hut". Hut, like a small house :x
LOL
"Lego Image-Fails" would be more fitting, missing the Lego Sets, that actually break the rules.
2:37
I love how the box calls grogu “ the child “
This was his name before grogu
That was his official name before S2 because it wasn't revealed
They made the set before the episode came out
The block in the picture is like: yeah imma just connect here
As someone who had sets with the older style instructions as a kid, I never found them difficult to follow, so I don't see why people complain about them so much. I remember when Lego started changing instruction styles, and I absolutely hated the then newer style that had increased boldness in the outlines, which especially made Technic instructions more of a pain to read.
Yes, older Lego sets were for children, not whiny adults. As a child, you rotated the piece, found out that the only logical way is to put it there, and you went on... If you build a Lego set nowadays, half of your build time is turning pages. In the older days one page showed nearly every new piece that is (more or less) visible from that specific viewpoint on the picture.
666 Lego mario
When the lego movie came out, I got a double decker couch set, and it didn’t come with a certain piece, so I couldn’t complete the set :/
You can order a Lego piece from the website
Where bingus
www.lego.com/en-us/page/static/Pick-a-Brick?icmp=HP-SHQL-EG-NO-pick-a-120
@@lilbill7385 There is actually a section specifically for replacing pieces. Generally it's free and done, if you need a lot of peices (or maybe you abuse it) they may require a proof of purchase.
Years ago, around 1998, there was a number you called, boy did I use it to get cool pieces from sets I didn't own. I did it for a while too, never got denied or charged.
@@rapmastac1362 in México still exist the number, when you buy s lego the employee tell you if some piece Is missing call this number
5:05 "you may think there is a lot of things with this set". Yeah, it exists.
True lol
🤣
??
Yup, that was indeed the joke. Good job repeating it in the comments!
This has been a long awaited Threequel
Spitprix: there is a lot of things wrong with this Lego trolls set
Me: like it’s existence
These are all just errors and misprints. Not a single instance of rule breaking or 'illegal builds' were shown.
Dude. Did you not watch the other 2? What did you expect?
Its still entertaining, if you would like to look at illegal builds be more specific. The title should be changed though to be fair in your defense.
thanks for not wasting my time with the video man
did you read the start of the video?
That’s how u clickbait lol
Nobody:
Thumbnail: destroy this lego to complete the build
Lego: k i l l i t
@@crjad9039 Lego: D e m o l i s h i t
@@Benutzername474 hmmmmm~ yes, *Demolishit*
I think that it supposed to go on a block behind the Lego gear
10:58
There was once a few years back that my family bought a Christmas themed lego set for our lego Christmas village. And when we opened up the box we found out that bag (3 or 4) was missing from the box. So we returned it and apparently there was some sort of production error and apparently each and everyone of those sets had bags missing. Thankfully they got in a new shipment the day we went there to return it so we were able to pick up a new copy of the set. Good thing we have only had this happen once! 😅
i once had one peice missing
@@SpeedDemon03 same i hate it. one time i got a fake lego set and the pieces were not cut properly
"Screw the rules, I have money"
-Seto Kaiba
*Seto Kaiba
Who cares about the heart of the cards when I have plot armour
Yu gi oh ayyyy
12:07 even the curved arm of the droid was off.
I had that and the boat one after it
cool tip, if you place the star wars droid body on backwards you can then add a lightsaber beam piece, or fire piece to make it look like the droid got shot
The thing I hate about stickers are the ones which overlap multiple bricks. Makes it really difficult/annoying when demolition of something to build again.
Love these vids. They are hilarious!
That Nismo upside-down sticker gave me physical reactions
A few years ago, I got a nexo knights set, the siege machine of doom thingy, I think it was called, but at the back of the 2nd instruction booklet, it had a page showcasing all the characters you could get in the same wave of sets, but all the names were messed up. Axl was labeled as “lance”, clay was labeled as “Aaron”, and so on.
That last one: i have build with the old instructions style when i was young and now i build with the new style.
What is wrong with paying attention and learning 3D visualisation while having Lego fun????
New style instructions are a waste of paper and ink with soooo many steps only involving one piece after one piece after one piece, it’s insane and minddumbing!!!
They were also not dark or overly contrasty, that's just bad scans ruining image quality lol.
And additional to the 1-step instructions the box says: "to build this set you need to be at least 25, have 15 years of experience, a degree and a grown up to help you"
i loved the old building instructions
Very much agreed! I noticed this also in reviews of the latest Technic sets, where even the tiny 42116 Skid Steer Loader with just 140 parts has over 60 pages of instructions. I still wonder how on earth I ever could have successfully built the big 8865 Test Car back in the day as a 10 year old kid from instructions in just 24 steps. The booklet has just 36 pages in total for the A-model, a B-model, _and_ instructions how to motorize that B-model. It's pure madness!
Some of the old Technic sets that were very big were almost impossible to understand.
I had an old Exo-Force set when I was a kid, and the cover to the instruction booklet was inverted from the rest of the pages. Probably just a simple case of the papers got flipped around during assembly, but still funny to remember.
Physics: *exists*
Lego: *hold my mistakes*
I would love a part 4 and I never knew lego made so many mistakes
12:33
the diver on the right has a scared face while the diver in the left looks happy
11:49 the droid has a 2nd error. The left arm is "upside down". It doesn't really matter a lot but I guess the thicker end should be the shoulder as it is on the right arm.
yeah I noticed that too
Yes I noticed that as well . Interesting
Well actually it's just being more in a natural position, if you're holding something with your hand your wrist will be like 90° turned. I don't think this was an error
@@shitmanlore it's not about the turn of the "hand" on his right hand but about the thick end of the left arm. They habe the thick and as hand and the thin one as shoulder. There is no turn. ;-)
@@MCtheAustrianBrickfan yea got it but from my prospective, it just looks more realistic in that way
I love this series, I love how you find Lego sets that breaks there own rules.
@@SpitBrix I too enjoy this
An issue with the new Lego Indominus Rex vs. Ankylosaurs set is that they have Zach and Gray's names switched on the box.
"This set is from 2004, the oldest in this list" at this moment i felt old
I found a phantom arrow on page 103 of the Lego TV from the Nintendo set 71374. The yellow arrow continues on the pages as far as as you can see it, until a piece covers where it was. Also on the same booklet on page 186 and 187 it shows the wrong printing for the red shell brick. I would like to see a part four, that would be great!
12:05 The droid also has both arms in different orientations. One arm is upside down
Says "huuuugggeeee mistake in the instructions" *arrow pointing to its intended spot* *color of one un important tiny piece is off* calm down bud.
6:17 I had that catalog as a kid and I was so confused
Steamboat Willie,: I thought of something funnier than 24,
Flinstones: what?
Steamboat Willie: 25
On the 6:14 one, I think I know what happened:
The top left set is correct, and has a reasonable price of $40, but the bottom right one is now a 4+ set, with an incredibly cheap price of $10. There is a juniors set smaller than this set but with a similar theme, so the catalog designers just put that image there because the set names were too alike. That’s just my thoughts.
But Is Lego Catalog 😞
I wish good luck to the ones that are participating in the give away
Thanks
thanks
Not a disagreement, the pommel has vertical ridges, and the rings around the center column go towards the blade. Modeled after Obi-Wan's saber if that helps.
part 3 is out yay i love this series hope part four comes out soon
LEGO: makes these sets
Spitbrix: you know the rules and so do i
Lol
We’re getting rickroll’d
Lego doesn’t seem to.
2:54 the designer did a bit of trolling
I LOVE THESE TYPES OF VIDEOS AND THAT YOUR POSTING EVEN MORE THIS MONTH!!! I LOVE YOUR VIDS THERE JUST AWESOME! :)
I FOUND A SET THAT BREAKS THE RULES!!
In the LEGO Creator Space Rover Explorer, set 31107, on page 213 step 3 its has you lay down 6 pieces
2 pages later on page 216, it instructs you to lay down those exact same pieces again despite the pieces already having been layed down, there is no where else for the pieces to go since they are already on the set and the previous pages image is the exact same as the one it is instructing you to add pieces to!
Loved the **TRIGGERED** box :)
The fourth part should be called “Way more LEGO sets that break the rules”
And the fifth should be called:
Too many lego sets that break the rules
And the sixth should be called
Oh my gosh how are there this many😂
Spitbrix: comment “double LEGO set” if you see this
Me: no I don’t think I will
@Sensible Otter exactly
I don't get this🤔
@@NotSoMagicMerlin its a joke that doesn't make sense
@Sensible Otter What..? Your small brain bro. Read that sentence again.
@@coolboy_swag OH I GET IT NOW HA THATS FUNNY 😂
I’ve had that problem happened to me before on that first Star Wars one
I've had this LEGO set that had a lot of mistakes!
It was the LEGO movie 2 statue of liberty one and the art work on the box on the back shows you that the bottom floor has a coffee shop and the coffee shops floors are gray but when I open the box the floors and pieces are suddenly brown and I've seen videos talking about it to!
Also on the instruction book there is an arrow that is just hanging there.... A Phantom Arrow!
@@SpitBrix idk
4:28 I'm pretty sure that's a mistake on the box, rather than on the instructions
12:05, isnt the left arm upside down? If you look at the soulder joint of right arm it would make sense.
It's interesting that Lego box *with offset printing error* might actually be more wanted collector item than the box with perfect print. For e.g. baseball cards, the card with fully *correct* printing are so rare that they are the collector items.
"You know the rules, and so do I"
Brickrolled....
@Ethan Kluesner *gun boom sounds*
Nice quality man!
The only 'incorrect set' I can personally remember is a walking AT-AT that my friend had been gifted. For whatever reason, an entire set of leg pieces was literally melted into a plastic blob. Not one whole blob, but several individual blobs. He couldn't ever finish the set because of this, as the replacement part service hadn't started yet or was poorly advertised, and ended up giving it to me since I had more Lego than he did. Heh.
Ive never heven seen or heard of anything like that!
My lego 501st battle pack came with 2 of the same pages on the instructions. I don't know if this came with everyone else's, but it came with mine
11:49 The droids left arm is upside down too. Very nice
Also in the new 2020 lego Star Wars Final Duel set there is a mistake in the manual that shows Darth Vader without arm prints even tho the actual mini-figure does.
Lol “Double LEGO Set”
I still have that catalog, actually looked up which one had the correct set pictured too, the one with the lower price was like a hotdog stand or something like that iirc
11:58 it isn't just the torso that's wrong with the droid it's also the arm it has a swollen hand.
13:50 this is exactly why I always thought that mega bloks/mega construx had better building instructions since they made the pieces you put on the build their standard color and the previous steps were dimmed for ease of understanding where pieces go.
Fun fact. I installed lights in my my lego set the wrong way, and i saved myself from needing a piece i didnt have.and it looked 100% better
Double Lego set Awesome! I hope Lego sees this
12:47 That mistake is real, it's in my instruction booklet as well lmao.
Yeah it’s weird it turns into a shadowy color lmao.
I have that set and I don’t remember seeing that in the booklet, I should go back and check to see if I have that error.
👏✌🏻
I will like 2 nuclear bombs, a militar jeep, a island in north korea, and a cheese burger, thanks 😁
@@Luislacombe07 ????
@@Luislacombe07 ok 👍
The lego 18+ crocodile train from 2020 instructions is very hard to follow due to the brown pieces on the black background.
Please include this in part 4 if you are making a part 4
Wow, that must be confusing to build those sets
I READ THIS AS HE SAID IT
OMGOMG
OMag
OMG
When stud shooters were new, I got a set with only the brilliant clone guns
y e s
stud shooters come in playability sets not in action sets, so you can still get them in the battle packs and a few other sets
@@mcfixer9503 I know, but the set was a set with stud shooters
I complained and also then I was sent the correct guns, so double the guns
That thumbs up Emmet at the end is clever, is it digital or a modified hand?
Once my Frozone minifigure has a smudged torso that was misaligned
Well the first mistake was getting frozone and not buying Star Wars
John Wolverton Minecraft / Minecraft dungeon lego sets best. Fight me nerd.
@@bariodoesrandomstuff4845 Agreed
oh gosh
Imagine being the editor at Lego and editing all these images. They think ah one small error, no one will notice. Then every little microscopic error you made gets published in a TH-cam video for everyone to see.
I remember a LEGO Power Miners set, the mech from the lava theme, having a sticker put on upside down on the box and it always irritated me as a kid haha
HONOURABLE MENTION: I own the AT-ST set and there's also a different problem: The AT-ST's driver's helmet in the parts list has no printing, even though in the box art and set is a printed helmet.
The only mistake i ever had with a lego set was 1 missing piece
Everyone Gangsta 'til Spitbrix shows german stuff, for example 6:26
I’m entering and this vid is awesome also double set
3:55 Well, technically the 2x is correct, as you have to repeat the movement twice: put a single black brick on another black brick.
I actually have that Battle On Takodana set. It's one of my favorites. Probably because The Force Awakens is so special to me.
I guess this is finally the perfect excuse to say that your Lego set came broken 😂
13:59 WAIT THATS EVEN MORE ILLEGAL
Yeah. I remember building the sand crawler. What an absolute nightmare.
1:43 lol I thought it was just bad photo quality
I owned that LEGO AT-ST and I had NO Idea about that black stud!
6:11 Double LEGO set
5:13 *Regular Show intro music intensifies*
It's not just the torso that's wrong in the instructions for building the battle droid in the Droid Gunship set. They also have you place the left arm upside down, with the thicker shoulder clip being portrayed as a hand for some reason.
I once bought a Lego set at Walmart...
AND IT CAME IN PIECES!!! A PROFESSIONAL COMPANY!!! 0/10 NEVER BUYING AGAIN!!!
12:00 and left arm
No thats how its supposed to be
@@sa1ry_ the other left
@@henriksandstrom2161 Yeah its supposed to have one straight and one bent for the gun
@@sa1ry_ but the turned one is flipped
@@sa1ry_ bent*
I think for the diver, the grey on his arm is like chain armor, like if you went diving with sharks you would wear some armor in case if a shark bites you. This is just what I think and I don’t know if it’s the true reason
2:40 if you look at the crossbow laser thing you can see the clear pillar pice under it