I think I had the same book as you. It was a Reader's Digest hardback called "Strange Stories, Amazing Facts" and yes, that photo creeped me out too. This is a very thorough investigation. Thank you .
@@dr.polaris6423 Good god, Dr Polaris! Not the bloody De Loy's Ape! Please don't try to scare me, lad. It scared you as a kid. It still scares me. Sometimes you are go too far.
De Loy's Ape is, without any doubts, with the Kasai Rex and Loch Ness "Nessie" Monster, one of the most famous the hoax/debunked cryptid !!! Always in any Top 5 of this category.
I very much enjoy the Cryptid videos. My favorite is the Kasai Rex for no other reason other than how laughably terrible the "photographic evidence" for it was. Those early Cryptids are my favorite as they are all products of their time with the notion that Africa hadn't changed at all since the time of Dinosaurs.
Yeah, Dr. Polaris made already numerous videos about cryptids in Africa and put forward the link and aspect of the common idea of the time, very strongly, alsmot merge, with the racism ideologies
Would be on the Deinotheriidae, since he do video about whole families of extinct animals instead to focus on one single genus. However, this family is very low in number, almost two genera only : Prodeinotherium and Deinotherium himself, and others undescribed yet fossils. So, there not a lot to pass 5 minutes on at least...
Dear Dr. Polaris, (wisest of all polar bears,) thank you for clearing up the backstory behind this sick joke once and for all. I've never liked the photo of the De Loys' ape either, and have always found it creepy and unsettling. Knowing that its spurious origin story was the work of racist villains helps to explain the unwholesome vibe that the image seems to generate. I'm glad that the French Resistance took care of that gross Nazi collaborator. I remain convinced that we DO have indigenous apes here in the Americas, however, but they are far taller than the poor little monkey in the photo... but enough about Sasquatch for now. I love your work, and can't wait to learn more about the prehistoric zoosphere! Best wishes, etc. --N
Perhaps you would appreciate my theories about Bigfoot & other man-ape cryptids being the final line of Boisei evolution? Or the idea that the Olmec of South America were the last of the Clovis people being that they were genius stone shapers but a bit crap at everything else!?
Do we hear well, the concept/terms of "Eugenics" and "Subspecies" AREN'T, in themselves, at all bad ideas or concepts despite the popular believes). And who are mean, as goals, to denigrate people in favored of others (mainly the caucassian white/chretians). It's the USES we make of them that are bad and racist. (explanations below) The term eugenics was used for the first time in 1883 by the British scientist Francis Galton (Charles Darwin's cousin, who made the identification by digital footprint), whose work contributed to the constitution of the eugenic movement (used by others people than himself. he never lead the movement itlsef, being not eugenic and pretty clean toward others people). Led by scientists and doctors, the eugenics that was put in place at the turn of the 20th century militated for a policy of eradication of traits deemed to be handicapping or development of traits deemed beneficial. By "traits deemed to be handicapping", it was mean diseased and malformations pathologies, never things such being black, or others non-caucassian traits, was mean to be bad traits. The pure base idea was to made a selection to made at the lowest these pathologies throughout humans populations, whatever the people/varieties. Which in itself isn't a negative, pejorative or racist thing. (even if, due to human low and long reproduction, as a extreme K selected species, such selection event/attempt to select traits whatever to fight against pathologies or to made breed of human (for the nazis) is extremely harsh, hard, long, tiring and expensive. With tardive and low results even on the long term. In addition to force people for something they most of the time will not have to will to do, and on such big umber and mondial populaltion. While/If not bad as an idea, the concept of Eugenics as a pratic and action to help the human species isn't even realisable, even if well managed without intervention of racist ideas.) But sadly, very quickly, others people (most of them being not good person, and selfish) used for bad goals and way the concept to denigrate people from the others races/varieties, to say that is to evolved the human species as a whole to made her perfect and to promote that the same said perfect human, and the only form at the end allowed to exist, would be the pure white caucassian people, without any genes from others humans. This form said also to be, "supposedly", theone from which all humans descend from. (which is of course not the case, and it's THAT who is racist and negative). Subspecies is a term to refer of a population of a precise species, who have is own unique physical (never intellectual) traits for herself and make her not a simple population with too slight traits, but don't make her her own species either. A subspecies is none others than a future apart species currently evolving. A species always have two subspecies if she have at least one recorded. Any subspecies of the same species isn't superior or inferior to the others, since they are all in the same evolution stage. ("sub" word isn't used here in this context to indicate a inferiority to another being, but to classifiate a form inside another one, as a subdocument inside a document who is composed by the latter and still fully part of him). It's a term that was created and always mean to be used just to classifiate animals, to identifiate which was a distinct species to which was not and just a form in it, never to indicate that some forms in a species, a specific genus/taxa, or in animals domain in general was stuck in a specific hierachy/rank because of her intellectual, mental or physical weakness or advantages and as an effect inherently inferior or superior to another form in particular. Both terms were created way before the 1900 century and all the bad and racist movements, that especially have their pinnacle during the dark 1940-1945 era with the Nazisme in Europe. It's however very worth to point forword that, in most case, not only both of terms/concepts were hugely, to a 180 degree, deviated from their intital definition, to be used under a second one, less rigorously scientifically made and defined, but were mostly used a lazy quick excuses to justifiate the bad people action in charge and who lead these racist and discriminatory actions that occured. That was used in the way of "Because it is" and only that. So, yeah, in final, these terms are like Albert Einstein works for the bombs, they were created without any evil means from their creators, and yet used by people that stel and redefined them for selfish and stupid goals...
I think you a another social media account, say a Twitter on a Mastodon. In regards to the previous. Yeah I know Elon Musk. But still it would be useful. If not that, the latter.
I just want everyone to know that Forgotten Bloodlines Kickstarted lunched a few days ago and I really want people to support it. also for the purpose of this video I would like to say screw Montandon.
There is nothing racist about idea that different human races evolved seperately from different apes/homids. It used to be genuine scientific theory in its age. Besides, it wasn't popular among European scientists only, in China it was official origin story for Chinese people until fairly recently.
Exposing eugenics as upper-class twaddle was actually made easier by the scientists who took it seriously & investigated discoveries like Heidelberg Man & the Neander valley caves. Eventually leading to the science of forensic anthropology. 🤓
I liked that eugenicist tree chart .. it was very "friendly"and science looking..I think we made a mistake interfering with nature and not respecting survival of the fittest. There was a very good reason that things were that way..Our kindness has made things worse.
@@choptop81 how about this.. the eugenicists have convinced the plebs to STERILIZE THEMSELVES thereby washing anyone's hands of having to do it themselves.. greatest 4D chess move ever.. You think the whole trans lets sterilize ourselves movement is organic ?? YIKES !! Eugenics is alive and well. Ask Bill Gates.
4:16 “he thought that it would ruin his career”.
Not the fact only 4 of the 20 people you lead came back alive from the trip lol
Yeah he was very casual about that!
Most of you will die, but that is a risk I'm willing to take
Lmao
I suppose it didn't count to his bosses if the dead members were non-white...
@@dr.polaris6423 whats ur intro song
I think I had the same book as you. It was a Reader's Digest hardback called "Strange Stories, Amazing Facts" and yes, that photo creeped me out too.
This is a very thorough investigation. Thank you .
Ah so that’s what it was called! I had completely forgotten that, but now it certainly rings a bell.
@@dr.polaris6423 whats ur intro song
@@dr.polaris6423 Good god, Dr Polaris! Not the bloody De Loy's Ape! Please don't try to scare me, lad. It scared you as a kid. It still scares me. Sometimes you are go too far.
I'm glad you came back to cryptozoological content! Perhaps do a video covering camelid or ammonoid evolution in the future?
I've been waiting for AGES.
Glad it was exposed
It should've had pants to be honest
Was it, the poor thing, I'm too much of a gentleman to look 😕
Glad Dr Polaris doesn't understand metric.
Was it though?
There’s a certain kind of feeling you get when you hear a story that you read about before the narrator was born.
De Loy's Ape is, without any doubts, with the Kasai Rex and Loch Ness "Nessie" Monster, one of the most famous the hoax/debunked cryptid !!!
Always in any Top 5 of this category.
I very much enjoy the Cryptid videos. My favorite is the Kasai Rex for no other reason other than how laughably terrible the "photographic evidence" for it was. Those early Cryptids are my favorite as they are all products of their time with the notion that Africa hadn't changed at all since the time of Dinosaurs.
Yeah, Dr. Polaris made already numerous videos about cryptids in Africa and put forward the link and aspect of the common idea of the time, very strongly, alsmot merge, with the racism ideologies
That mysterious ape cryptid
Fascinating story, thanks for sharing!
so many tales to tell, the past was amazing, brutal, weird, thank you dr polaris for telling the tale.
Good 👍 take on this
Thanks :)
@@dr.polaris6423 whats ur intro song
Gonna do the Piltdown man hoax and Charles Dawson next?
Would be great !!!!
I’ve been looking forward to you covering the cryptid and I’m so glad you did. The video was perfect
De Loy's Ape: The Search for Oil
Gosh, that was infuriating. Thanks for telling the story.
I'd bet the book was Unexplained! By Jerome Clark. I had a large purple paperback.
What your opinion on Moldy cheese?
whats ur intro song
love your content. keep it up man
Thanks, Doc P.! The idea that you were creeped makes me feel better about being creeped!
This thing looks super uncanny, it keeps me awake at night. Probably cause it's literally a dead monkey or something.
Good god, Dr Polaris! Not the bloody De Loy's Ape! Please don't try to scare me, lad. You are going too far. Cheerio.
Could you make a Video on deinotherium
Would be on the Deinotheriidae, since he do video about whole families of extinct animals instead to focus on one single genus.
However, this family is very low in number, almost two genera only : Prodeinotherium and Deinotherium himself, and others undescribed yet fossils.
So, there not a lot to pass 5 minutes on at least...
I always thought the monkey was male...
this is one of my favourite channels
Dear Dr. Polaris, (wisest of all polar bears,) thank you for clearing up the backstory behind this sick joke once and for all. I've never liked the photo of the De Loys' ape either, and have always found it creepy and unsettling. Knowing that its spurious origin story was the work of racist villains helps to explain the unwholesome vibe that the image seems to generate. I'm glad that the French Resistance took care of that gross Nazi collaborator.
I remain convinced that we DO have indigenous apes here in the Americas, however, but they are far taller than the poor little monkey in the photo... but enough about Sasquatch for now.
I love your work, and can't wait to learn more about the prehistoric zoosphere! Best wishes, etc. --N
Perhaps you would appreciate my theories about Bigfoot & other man-ape cryptids being the final line of Boisei evolution? Or the idea that the Olmec of South America were the last of the Clovis people being that they were genius stone shapers but a bit crap at everything else!?
Great video!👍
Wake up babe, new Dr Polaris video has dropped
that was fun and educational.. I enjoy your intro reggae.. What is it ??
Are you the Doctor of all Polarises?
Polarises? Polarii? Scientists are baffled!
I have seen video of Trey the Explainer, but I'm curious to learn more.
Your not learning anything. Trey is a lier who spreads misinformation, takes his opinions as facts, refuses to take criticism and is a reddit atheist.
Being brainwashed by Trey the reddit atheist is not learning. Do your research online. TH-camrs are not sources.
@@Thunderblock7889 examples? You sound more like butthurt theist who deep down knows that their beliefs have no merit, no evidence for 🙄
Do we hear well, the concept/terms of "Eugenics" and "Subspecies" AREN'T, in themselves, at all bad ideas or concepts despite the popular believes).
And who are mean, as goals, to denigrate people in favored of others (mainly the caucassian white/chretians).
It's the USES we make of them that are bad and racist. (explanations below)
The term eugenics was used for the first time in 1883 by the British scientist Francis Galton (Charles Darwin's cousin, who made the identification by digital footprint), whose work contributed to the constitution of the eugenic movement (used by others people than himself. he never lead the movement itlsef, being not eugenic and pretty clean toward others people). Led by scientists and doctors, the eugenics that was put in place at the turn of the 20th century militated for a policy of eradication of traits deemed to be handicapping or development of traits deemed beneficial.
By "traits deemed to be handicapping", it was mean diseased and malformations pathologies, never things such being black, or others non-caucassian traits, was mean to be bad traits.
The pure base idea was to made a selection to made at the lowest these pathologies throughout humans populations, whatever the people/varieties.
Which in itself isn't a negative, pejorative or racist thing.
(even if, due to human low and long reproduction, as a extreme K selected species, such selection event/attempt to select traits whatever to fight against pathologies or to made breed of human (for the nazis) is extremely harsh, hard, long, tiring and expensive. With tardive and low results even on the long term. In addition to force people for something they most of the time will not have to will to do, and on such big umber and mondial populaltion. While/If not bad as an idea, the concept of Eugenics as a pratic and action to help the human species isn't even realisable, even if well managed without intervention of racist ideas.)
But sadly, very quickly, others people (most of them being not good person, and selfish) used for bad goals and way the concept to denigrate people from the others races/varieties, to say that is to evolved the human species as a whole to made her perfect and to promote that the same said perfect human, and the only form at the end allowed to exist, would be the pure white caucassian people, without any genes from others humans. This form said also to be, "supposedly", theone from which all humans descend from. (which is of course not the case, and it's THAT who is racist and negative).
Subspecies is a term to refer of a population of a precise species, who have is own unique physical (never intellectual) traits for herself and make her not a simple population with too slight traits, but don't make her her own species either.
A subspecies is none others than a future apart species currently evolving.
A species always have two subspecies if she have at least one recorded.
Any subspecies of the same species isn't superior or inferior to the others, since they are all in the same evolution stage.
("sub" word isn't used here in this context to indicate a inferiority to another being, but to classifiate a form inside another one, as a subdocument inside a document who is composed by the latter and still fully part of him).
It's a term that was created and always mean to be used just to classifiate animals, to identifiate which was a distinct species to which was not and just a form in it, never to indicate that some forms in a species, a specific genus/taxa, or in animals domain in general was stuck in a specific hierachy/rank because of her intellectual, mental or physical weakness or advantages and as an effect inherently inferior or superior to another form in particular.
Both terms were created way before the 1900 century and all the bad and racist movements, that especially have their pinnacle during the dark 1940-1945 era with the Nazisme in Europe.
It's however very worth to point forword that, in most case, not only both of terms/concepts were hugely, to a 180 degree, deviated from their intital definition, to be used under a second one, less rigorously scientifically made and defined, but were mostly used a lazy quick excuses to justifiate the bad people action in charge and who lead these racist and discriminatory actions that occured.
That was used in the way of "Because it is" and only that.
So, yeah, in final, these terms are like Albert Einstein works for the bombs, they were created without any evil means from their creators, and yet used by people that stel and redefined them for selfish and stupid goals...
5:14 the engineers from prometheus are not the pinnacle 😂
😂
Algorithmic
What are your thoughts on non-compulsory eugenics?
It will lead to discrimination and destroy genetic diversity
@@bloodandempire can you please elaborate?
@@SliceySlicer incest
Sort of gibbon like and could have been deposited by passing boats or shipwrecks
Support Forgotten Bloodlines: Agate NEEDS OUR SUPPORT!
Ah, I love a good cryptid. While most are probably not real the question will always be intriguing like Bigfoot. Either way I want to believe.
I think you a another social media account, say a Twitter on a Mastodon. In regards to the previous. Yeah I know Elon Musk. But still it would be useful. If not that, the latter.
I just want everyone to know that Forgotten Bloodlines Kickstarted lunched a few days ago and I really want people to support it. also for the purpose of this video I would like to say screw Montandon.
There is nothing racist about idea that different human races evolved seperately from different apes/homids. It used to be genuine scientific theory in its age. Besides, it wasn't popular among European scientists only, in China it was official origin story for Chinese people until fairly recently.
Oh you poor naive thing
Exposing eugenics as upper-class twaddle was actually made easier by the scientists who took it seriously & investigated discoveries like Heidelberg Man & the Neander valley caves. Eventually leading to the science of forensic anthropology. 🤓
I liked that eugenicist tree chart .. it was very "friendly"and science looking..I think we made a mistake interfering with nature and not respecting survival of the fittest. There was a very good reason that things were that way..Our kindness has made things worse.
believe me if you talked to a eugenecist they would find some way to decide you are "unfit"
@@choptop81 how about this.. the eugenicists have convinced the plebs to STERILIZE THEMSELVES thereby washing anyone's hands of having to do it themselves.. greatest 4D chess move ever.. You think the whole trans lets sterilize ourselves movement is organic ?? YIKES !! Eugenics is alive and well. Ask Bill Gates.
@@storytimewithunclekumaran5004 let me guess, you think the jews are also involved somehow
You do realise that kindness is what allows social species to thrive, right, not just humans?
@@samrizzardi2213 is it ???
i read that book so many times