Wide & Wonderful - 7Artisans 9mm f5.6 (Sony-E, L-mount, Nikon Z, Canon RF)

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 21 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 38

  • @22welcome
    @22welcome ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thank you so much for sharing your thought about this lens , I bought it , love it , as you said :(So easy to focus on this manual lens) 👌👌👌

    • @PavSZ
      @PavSZ  ปีที่แล้ว

      Thank you for watching!
      I'm loving mine

  • @jacobg1796
    @jacobg1796 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Great review as always! I really appreciate that you aren't sharpness obsessed like some reviewers, instead evaluating each lens on its own merits. This lens is definitely one for the wishlist!

    • @PavSZ
      @PavSZ  ปีที่แล้ว

      thank you for watching

  • @Seapatico
    @Seapatico ปีที่แล้ว +2

    This is the most impressive lens I've ever seen under $500. I'd love to see some reportage with it. Like, if you're in the middle of a crowd, what could you get with it? Super interesting and great review!

    • @PavSZ
      @PavSZ  ปีที่แล้ว

      certainly a cool lens!
      I will be using it in the future productions for sure

  • @CaptRohmer
    @CaptRohmer ปีที่แล้ว +1

    All of your vids are super helpful. I’m grateful for these lenses as they’re pretty much all that’s available for RF mount since autofocus etc is banned by Canon.

    • @PavSZ
      @PavSZ  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Great to hear!
      Maybe Canon will eventually let other brands to make AF lenses. We all hope

  • @classic.cameras
    @classic.cameras ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Great video. Makes me want one. But I don't ever use my Rokinon 14mm f2.8 as it is and barely use my Sony 20mm f1.8 lens. So... hmm...

    • @PavSZ
      @PavSZ  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      yeah, that's what I said in my video. It is only good value for money if you are going to use it

  • @wombat3024
    @wombat3024 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Just received mine, and had a first "play" with it after it had warmed up from being in a delivery van. Looks promising, the results from interior shots look good, as do the landscape ones in the field at the back of my house (luckily some interesting clouds about). I intend to use it mostly for architectural interiors, then for certain landscapes. I got an obvious sunstar, but no real flare, when I shot straight into the sun through a tree. Using it on a Sony A1, and A7rii.

    • @PavSZ
      @PavSZ  ปีที่แล้ว

      Nice! I love this lens

  • @JaredHoyman
    @JaredHoyman ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Good alternative for real estate photographers like me who own the canon 15-35 2.8 but don’t want to spend the money for the new canon 10-20 f4 rf.

    • @PavSZ
      @PavSZ  ปีที่แล้ว

      absolutely

  • @LeeAxonisDigifin
    @LeeAxonisDigifin ปีที่แล้ว

    I always enjoy your videos and your relaxed approach. Have a good weekend and shoot lots of people.

    • @PavSZ
      @PavSZ  ปีที่แล้ว

      Thank you very much!

  • @Ansonandco
    @Ansonandco ปีที่แล้ว

    LOVE your shots dude!

    • @PavSZ
      @PavSZ  ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks man!

  • @timelapsebylkunl72
    @timelapsebylkunl72 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great review. Thank!

    • @PavSZ
      @PavSZ  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thanks for watching!

  • @princeharbinger
    @princeharbinger ปีที่แล้ว

    Comparing your review of the LAOWA 9MM 5.6 FF-RL. You've improved tremendously since than and the quality of your work reflects that in this review. Would you mind elaborating a bit more on how this lens is better than the Laowa?

    • @PavSZ
      @PavSZ  ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Practice makes perfect. Thank you!
      I think this lens renders the images better than Laowa. Images taken with Laowa need more post processing in my opinion.

  • @SkratchGh
    @SkratchGh ปีที่แล้ว +1

    How can set to my lumix Gh5

    • @PavSZ
      @PavSZ  ปีที่แล้ว

      you can't. They don't make it with micro four thirds mount

  • @h.lyngkhoi2708
    @h.lyngkhoi2708 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    How wide is it on an APSC?

    • @PavSZ
      @PavSZ  ปีที่แล้ว

      about 13.5mm

  • @garreswe
    @garreswe ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Why is it better than Laowa's? They look identical and Laowa's is even 3 degrees wider, a few grams lighter, has a closer focusing distance and they offer a filter holder.
    Also I wonder why they made a 5.6 lens because they mainly compete with price against Laowa now. I think people would like a 2.8 or at least 4.0 lens, even if it was more expensive and larger.

    • @PavSZ
      @PavSZ  ปีที่แล้ว

      I think it renders the images better than Laowa. Images taken with Laowa need more post processing in my opinion.
      I think producing cost of f2.8 or f4 lens would also be much higher, not only its size and weight

  • @josebardaji9487
    @josebardaji9487 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sigo sin tener muy claro que sea mejor que el laowa...

    • @PavSZ
      @PavSZ  ปีที่แล้ว

      I'd reply to your comment but I don't understand it

  • @MrYessyess
    @MrYessyess ปีที่แล้ว

    nice video, thumbs up

    • @PavSZ
      @PavSZ  ปีที่แล้ว

      Big thanks

    • @MrYessyess
      @MrYessyess ปีที่แล้ว +1

      And the mail dellivered me this lens today@@PavSZ

    • @PavSZ
      @PavSZ  ปีที่แล้ว

      @@MrYessyess NICE one!

  • @angelisone
    @angelisone ปีที่แล้ว +1

    What a joke of a lens, it's with a dated slow F5.6. Where f2.8?
    And if many beginners are lost the depth of field scale (1:35) has been compressed so much. Just buy used wide angel lenses beyond 36 years & save

    • @PavSZ
      @PavSZ  ปีที่แล้ว +3

      it's not a joke. It's f5.6, not everyone shoots everything at f2.8
      Good luck finding 36 year old 9mm anyway

    • @nightdonutstudio
      @nightdonutstudio ปีที่แล้ว

      9mm f2.8? I wonder which company will be the first to make such lens.😂

    • @angelisone
      @angelisone ปีที่แล้ว

      @@PavSZ I guess you never met ATG & Nikon. ATG made many rare lenses. I have ATG 6/2.0 (1 stop faster) & two ATG's Nikon 6/2.8.
      If you jumped into Canon systems, ATG's 1200/5.0 & ATG/Canon 1200/5.6. No cheap.