Evolutionists Have Been CAUGHT Intentionally Lying About This
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 6 มิ.ย. 2024
- SHOCKING evidence that evolution is one grand illusion they’re INTENTIONALLY lying about. In this presentation, Dr. Terry Mortenson reveals numerous major inconsistencies and exposes downright lies evolutionists have been spreading.
========
Answers in Genesis is an apologetics (Christianity-defending) ministry dedicated to enabling Christians to defend their faith and proclaim the good news of Jesus Christ effectively.
On our TH-cam channel, you’ll find answers to your most pressing questions about key issues like creation, evolution, science, the age of the earth, and social issues. We desire to train believers to develop a worldview based on the Bible and expose the bankruptcy of evolutionary ideas and their implications.
You’ll hear from top teachers such as Ken Ham, Martyn Iles, Bryan Osborne, Dr. Georgia Purdom, Dr. Nathaniel Jeanson, Dr. Tim Chaffey, Bodie Hodge, Dr. Gabriela Haynes, Dr. Terry Mortenson, and more.
Please help us continue to share the gospel around the world: AnswersinGenesis.org/give
I remember watching a documentary once where they showed two small bone fragments no more than a square inch each, then had an artist :recreate: what he thought the ape-man that they supposedly belonged to would have looked like. Even though 98% percent of this thing was completely made up by an artist, they showed the final piece and acted as if it were scientific proof of evolution.
It's insane the lengths they'll go to.
I see them raising up pieces of parchment with one dot of ink and proclaiming that they are reading the word of God. They are CREATING the words that they want .... "The Publishers" control the narrative and my local friend did deep dive research into why McMillian Publishing is the clearing house for publications provided to every educational facility in the Nation. Scribing on paper and spelling the fate of future generation's beliefs.
Just think about what they TAUGHT you to believe..... where I live, everyone woke up one morning to hear "the bridge fell by accident" and not ONE of them questioned - WHAT IF if wasn't an accident, because Francis Scott Key was a founding member of the Jesuit American Bible Society.
BUT - the day after that bridge hit the water, Donald Trump began selling the KJV of the American Bible ..... The last time people fought for that was called "The American Revolution" and those people were called "Loyalist" during the Battle of Baltimore. Joe Biden's daddy was born in Baltimore.
"O say, do you see" what is clearly written in the annals of history, no one wants to believe.... but, what is created from a fragment creates a "world" of unreal truths.
I have seen this mahself which I found to be the most ludicrous and ridiculous thing I have ever heard and seen.
You mentioned about the actual DNA similarity with the chimp genome to a human male is more like 85% similar.
How interesting that human women are 86% similar to men.
Did they consider that chimps having an extra chromosome, so 24 vs. us, which is 23. In humans when there is an extra gene, the child has Down’s Syndrome and is retarded.
I think the differences between men and women, men view women as inferior, with the 14% genetic difference, and can take the women’s sports trophies from them as there is no morality inherent in Darwinism. If you are bigger and badder, you survive, so that the only good is to win, so therefore cheating must be respected as more evolved. It is disgusting thinking.
Good video, very interesting.
Please cite the documentary, so I can look it up and see whether what you say is true!
Please pray for my brother Kenneth. He has been diagnosed with depression in the past but is know showing signs of schizophrenia.
Please pray that God would heal him from all mental disorders, release him from any demonic opression and fill him with the Holy Spirit.
In the name of Jesus Christ, amen!
Christianity is a mental disorder
go to a doctor
Would that be Kenneth Ham?
Did he have cats ? Toxoplasmosis is associated with schizophrenia
Amen
Funny that evolution is about progress but yet everything in creation is slowing down, degrading and dying…no more progressing, no more evolving.
Man thinks himself as god and all that God hears is baby babble.
“Do you see a man wise in his own eyes?
There is more hope for a fool than for him.”- Proverbs 26:12🙏🏼
"Funny that evolution is about progress": absolute;y false. Evolution is simply about CHANGE
"yet everything in creation is slowing down, degrading and dying" - Whoever told you that was simply lying.
_evolution is about progress_
No it's not
_no more evolving_
All living things are evolving, they never stop
Then what is human evolving to?
You think evolution is about one animal evolve individually but in reality animals get weaker and eventually dies therefore evolution is nonsense? Your claim only showing your total complete ignorance about evolution alone with everyone likes your comment…evolution is about natural selection for generations for the group as a whole to evolve, it’s not about individuals in one lifespan at all
@@shannonmicete7020yes we do not much
Here in the West Virginia coalfields, we have coal seams that have slate over them. Just at the top of the coal seams, we find both ammonites and petrified tree trunks, some laying horizontal but mostly vertical trunks. Only a major flood such as the one in Genesis can explain these two fossils together, along with many other fossils found on top of the seams.
You would expect that to be a consistent layer across most of the world. What you might have there is a localised flood event in the past.
Around 500 million years ago during the Cambrian period modern day West Virgina was under a shallow sea. No flood just evidence of changes in sea level due to plate tectonics. In fact, the amount of water to flood the world as described in the bible would render the entire planet devoid of life (I recommend watching Aronra's videos on the flood). So, that fact alone we are alive now disproves the mythical global flood.
@@grandfathernurgle2840 I would say my theory is just as good as yours, if not better. Anyway, even shallow seas can't support vegetation, not to any span over miles of water anyway. Shallow seas? Must have been a pretty flat earth! Sorry, but your theory is unbelievable to say the least. Here's the kicker, the seams run on a fairly straight level and washouts are deeply cut in the middle where the hollows lay. Plates shifting upward would not leave such a layout as this, only a flood could do that.
@@wingednut2283 On top of the mountain? that span for miles? No, we have coal all over the world, just in places where debris is settled and mud from settlement overlays it. Every canyon shows washout due to breakage of sentiment dams breaking as the water receded. The Great Salt Lake in Utah is an excellent example, remnants of a basin that broke to form the Grand Canyon and the washout ended up in southern California and the deserts of the southwest and Mexico. Even the tar pits of the southwest hold many species that washed there.
@@ronniemurphy2124 what's a hollow? If you're from West Virginia, you know we don't have hollows, we have hollers. 😉
Hebrews 4:12
“For the word of God is alive and active. Sharper than any double-edged sword, it penetrates even to dividing soul and spirit, joints and marrow; it judges the thoughts and attitudes of the heart.”
The Bible tells us that the word of God is alive. It is powerful and sharper than any two-edged sword. This verse from Hebrews shows how deeply God’s word can cut through our thoughts and intentions. It divides soul and spirit, joints and marrow.
It judges our heart’s thoughts and attitudes. When we read or listen to these words, they change us. They work on our minds like a surgeon’s scalpel, revealing what we really think and feel.
Actually, the Word in this verse is Jesus. You got a bad Bible: Heb 4:12 For the word of God is quick, and powerful, and sharper than any twoedged sword, piercing even to the dividing asunder of soul and spirit, and of the joints and marrow, and is a discerner of the thoughts and intents of the heart.
Heb 4:13 Neither is there any creature that is not manifest in HIS sight: but all things are naked and opened unto the eyes of him with whom we have to do.
Heb 4:14 Seeing then that we have a great high priest, that is passed into the heavens, Jesus the Son of God, let us hold fast our profession.
"Hebrews" went into a fort at Whetstone Pont in Baltimore (1813), but after a Battle in Baltimore, Francis Scott Key helped to make "The Maryland Mission" (1633) the "American Bible Society (1816) AND "a sect of people proclaiming themselves to be Jewish" were awarded with "Religious Freedom" (1826).
When people started coming together against "The Society" and "The J3ws" it was called "The Civil War" and then the reformation into the incorporation of the Ancient industrial nation. The "Great" bible hoax (1881) and the 'Great" fire (1904) gave rise to the Greek Gods (1905) when FSK became Orpheus at Fort McHenry. By the World's Fair in 1933 they were hosting an open celebration to Ba'al and after that all hell broke loose, because they assisted in the creation of science at the medical practice, where the Brotherhood of Death built.
Those "Experts" of the Jesuit Pope, the Holy Land of Jerusalem and the Science of Johns Hopkins has "confused" the thought of NATURAL humans and made the reliant on the CREATIONS of convenience that become regulated by "Law." The new one in Maryland is that EVERY house in the state has to eliminate their NATURAL Gas supply. We are "Going GREEN" cha ching cha ching cha ching.
Exactly! Praise be to God!
@@citoante , Sweetheart, Jesus is God! Some people who deny that Jesus is God make the claim that Jesus never said that He is God. It is correct that the Bible never records Jesus saying the precise words, “I am God.” This does not mean, however, that Jesus never claimed to be God.
So, is Jesus God? - Jesus claimed to be God.
Take for example the words of Jesus in John 10:30, “I and the Father are one.” We need only to look at the Jews’ reaction to His statement to know He was claiming to be God. They tried to stone Him for this very reason: “You, a mere man, claim to be God” (John 10:33, emphasis added). The Jews understood exactly what Jesus was claiming- which is DIETY. When Jesus declared, “I and the Father are one,” He was saying that He and the Father are of ONE NATURE AND ESSENCE. In John 8:58 it gives another example. Jesus declared, “I TELL YOU THE TRUTH … BEFORE ABRAHAM WAS BORN, I AM!” This is a reference back to Exodus 3:14 when God revealed Himself as the “I AM.” The Jews who heard this statement responded by taking up stones to kill Him for blasphemy, as the Mosaic Law commanded (Leviticus 24:16).
Is Jesus God? - His followers declared Him to be God.
John reiterates the concept of Jesus’ deity: “The Word [Jesus] was God” and “the Word became flesh” (John 1:1, 14). These verses clearly indicate that Jesus is God in the flesh (Human Form). In Acts 20:28 it tells us, “Be shepherds of the church of God, which He bought with His own blood.” Who bought the church with His own blood? Yep! You guessed right, it was Jesus Christ. And this same verse declares that God purchased His church with His own blood. Therefore People of America, JESUS IS GOD.
Thomas the disciple declared concerning Jesus, “My Lord and my God” (John 20:28). Jesus does not correct him. Titus 2:13 encourages us to wait for the coming of our God and Savior, Jesus Christ (read also 2 Peter 1:1). In Hebrews 1:8, God the Father (The first Person of the Trinity) declares of Jesus, “But about the Son He says, ‘Your throne, O God, will last forever and ever, and righteousness will be the scepter of your kingdom.’” The Father refers to Jesus as God, indicating that Jesus is indeed God.
In the Book of Revelation, an angel instructed the apostle John to only worship God (Revelation 19:10). Several times in Scripture Jesus receives worship (Matthew 2:11; 14:33; 28:9, 17; Luke 24:52; John 9:38). He never rebukes people for worshiping Him. If Jesus were not God, He would have told people to not worship Him, just as the angel in Revelation did. Beyond these, there are many other passages of Scripture that argue for Jesus being God.
Is Jesus God? - The reason Jesus must be God.
The most important reason that Jesus must be God is that, if He is not God, His death would not have been sufficient to pay the penalty for the sins of the world of all humanity (1 John 2:2). A created being, which Jesus would be if He were not God, COULD NOT PAY THE INFINITE PENALTY REQUIRED FOR THE SIN OF ALL HUMANITY AGAINST AN INFINITE GOD. Only God could pay such an infinite penalty. Only God could take on the sins of the world (2 Corinthians 5:21), die, and be resurrected, proving His victory over sin and death.
Is Jesus God? Yes Absolutely! Jesus declared Himself to be God. His followers believed Him to be God. The provision of salvation only works if Jesus is God. Jesus is God incarnate, the eternal Alpha and Omega, The Beginning and The End (Revelation 1:8; 22:13), and God our Savior (2 Peter 1:1).
@@GODSPEAKS898 mm, I just wonder where did you get Idea that you needed to explain that to me? Are you reading comments with any discernment or you just see what you want to see? If I say that the Word in Heb 4:12 is Jesus does that imply to you that I say Jesus isn’t God? Strange.
They ignore the mDNA and claim "It's a good thing we have the bones "
Who ignores mDNA? Certainly not the scientist because without them we wouldnt even know what mDNA is.
Who is "they" and what is your exact point?
Where's mDNA in the Bible? 🤔🤣
@@all_bets_on_Ganesh _"Certainly not the scientist [sic] because without them we wouldnt [sic] even know"_
That's you admitting that you allow your programmers -- professional Darwin cheerleaders whom you mindlessly, reverently misname "scientists" -- do your thinking for you.
@25dollarbill24 im not sure what you think there is to think about. I stated scientists discovered mDNA. Do you not agree with this?
The unbelieving world is simply amassing more evidence against itself for the Day of Judgement. 😢
First Satan comes claiming to be God, Christ and deceives the whole world..
II Thessalonians 2:1-4, Then Christ returns at the end of Satan's tribulation, Mark 13:24-26.. Then there is the millennium where many will be taught God's word, then Satan is released from the pit he was placed in during the millennium to test souls, THEN COMES THE GREAT WHITE THRONE JUDGEMENT.. Many will still follow Satan into the Lake of Fire!
@user-ch8mx1vz9u Romans 1:18 "For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who hold the truth in unrighteousness;
1:19 Because that which may be known of God is manifest in them; for God hath showed 𝘪𝘵 unto them.
1:20 For the invisible 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘨𝘴 of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, 𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘯 his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse:
1:21 Because that, when they knew God, they glorified 𝘩𝘪𝘮 not as God, neither were thankful; but became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened.
1:22 Professing 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘮𝘴𝘦𝘭𝘷𝘦𝘴 to be wise, they became fools,"
Hebrews 9:27 "And as it is appointed unto men once to die, but after this the judgment:"
He
Hebrews 9:27 "
@@billb3673 oh but wait the armodea galaxy exist does that not condrict YEC and AiG
I fear not what I believe to not exist. Death is the end, we're not special.
You fail to rationalize the scale of biological existence and thus attribute yourself to your imaginary friend.
Just because we don't understand every detail does not mean it's supernatural.
@@xxUBIQUExx Then why do you respond to an insane person? God has placed the fear of mortality in all mankind and whether anyone chooses to deny it is their free will. We all have an eternal soul which will spend eternity in either heaven, if the free gift of salvation through the Lord Jesus Christ is accepted, or in a place of punishment if that free gift is rejected. You're only trying to convince yourself of what you say to try to have some peace of mind whereas I don't want any to perish for eternity. Maranatha
Even as a kid I used to say to my parents, 'Why aren't apes turning into humans' ?
Well they never have, never will..... I am from Aliens...
Not everything has to turn into a human even if we are related.
Every species follows a different path, and is constantly adapting to a changing environment. We can observe some changes and analyze things like vestigial structures, but major changes take thousands or even millions of years.
Evolution showed up drunk to work when Bill Nye said you could just imagine your gender.
❤
Bill Nye the zero science Guy
Which is correct. Gender is a social construct. So it is whatever you want it to be. Sex is a biological construct. It isn’t whatever you want it to be although modern medicine can make it pretty close. And t he re is a massive amount of varyation.
Bill Nye is not a scientist and never has been . No actual scientist buys that gender fluid crap.
@@DreadEnder gender and sex are synonyms
"He cut the 'damaged' pieces out..." and proceeded to fashion a plaster prosthetic from what he believed it was "supposed to" look like...
🤦🏽♂️🤷🏽♂️😠
that sounds like a type of surgery that some people believe they need or else they will ☠
It's art. It's a sculpture. A gaffe. Fake taxidermy. Like Piltdown hoax or the Fiji Mermaid; Hilarious!
yourmommapithicus
One aberation as an example, but hundreds of real key findings not mentioned.
@@daverson8609 not mentioned, because the truth might hurt their feelings
I was just arguing with someone the other day, about the changes to available information resources. The Encyclopaedia Brittanica I grew up with state unequivocally that it is impossible for any ape or monkey or other primate to walk upright for any significant time, before significant damage would be caused to the spine. And as such presents an insurmountable obstacle to be overcome in order for them to ever seriously considered ancestral to humans. They attempted to claim that this represents an obsolete concept & that now it is widely accepted that we share a distinct evolutionary line, & then began to cite Lucy & such as proofs. I countered that these were all proven frauds.
And yet the only actual fraud you can point to is Piltdown Man, which was found out as one by scientists instead of creationists, and it was other fossil finds in Africa that was casting doubt on it.
Whoever told you Lucy was afraid was simply lying. You can investigate itself of you had an open mind, which you just admitted you do not.
@@burnttoast2790 doing a carpentry job on Lucy’s pelvis with a power saw is a pretty good indication of fraud, as he claims it by doing so it made everything fit like the pieces of a puzzle. Other words, falsifying data is justified as long as it gives you the result you want. That isn’t science.
@@jockyoung4491 who said Lucy was afraid of anything?
@bradleyomeley8669, your argument immediately fails. NOBODY, not ONE “evolutionist”, believes that any MODERN ape or MODERN monkey or MODERN primate was ancestral to MODERN humans. Modern apes & modern monkeys share a common ancestor that was its own species, NOT either MODERN ape nor MODERN monkey. As such, it is 100% irrelevant if a MODERN ape or MODERN monkey could, or could not, walk upright.
I have SERIOUS doubts that your Encyclopedia Brittanica said anything like that. First, most primates, including apes, monkeys & bonobos, are ALREADY “facultative bipeds”, so the barrier to them becoming “obligate bipeds”, given sufficient environmental pressure, would be very low, and, over time, their anatomy would adjust to that pressure. And the guy in this video was intentionally misleading (aka., “lying”) when he played the video of the biomechanics guy re-working the Australopithecus pelvis. First, over the last 20 years, Anthropologists have found lots of australopithicus skeletons, they know that they were bipedalal, and if Creationists really wanted to prove their case, they could make their own cast of “Lucy’s” pelvis & re-work it into a quadrupedal pelvis. They won’t try, because it can not be done. You can NOT turn a quadraped’s pelvis into a biped’s (or vice versa) with a few swipes of a Dremel tool.
My faith is a gift, completely undeserved, from God in Scripture.
Being able to turn your brain off is not a gift.
Doesn’t take a brain, it takes a heart open to the truth of God.
@@richardgregory3684 What makes you think His brain is off just because he doesn't think like you? That is odd.
@@HisWordisLife4U Faith is the opposite of thinking. It's not a virtue.
Thank you Lord Jesus 🙏
Amen AIG 🙏 we know that the only truth worth having in this world is the truth that comes from God's word. Everything else has been tainted by wickedness and sin.
How convenient only your worldview came through the taint and corruption unscathed.
@@matthewgordonpettipas6773 not convenient when you consider that God is above that. God is holy and just
@@matthewgordonpettipas6773 If you don't believe it why are you so busy arguing against it? I always find it fascinating that no one ever argues with the Hindus, the Buddhists, the Moonies, but bring out an an Evangelical Christian and everyone has a fit. Why is that? I don't spend anytime on things I don't believe---why do you?
Grow up
@@troywest7045 repent
No evolutionists dont use that simplistic chart....it is far more nuanced than that. Any educated person knows that!
The gist was there
I go with the Bible stories of creation not Darwinism
That's fine, but just don't claim it is supporte by science.
@@jockyoung4491 that is correct: Darwinism is not supported by evidence. 160 years after Darwin wrote his book on evolution. There exists in the fossil record no evidence any creature evolving into any other kind of creature.
God bless you alan for following the truth of the Holy Bible, and not the fairy-tales of Darwinism.
Biologists don't go by Darwinism, either. But because Darwin got so much wrong, AIG prefers to refute that strawman rather then refuting the current evidence.
@@saintmalaclypse3217 pse, Wow, so the founder of Evolutionism "got so much wrong". That's quite a big difference from the founder of Christianity, who got everything right.
adapting a hypothesis to accommodate new data is an understandably difficult concept to grasp for somebody who gets his scientific hypotheses from a book thats old as dirt
15:15 Fun fact: We have antistesia today because of one doctor out of thousands who read this verse and saw God put Adam to sleep before surgery
Nope. The Sumerians were using opium as an anaesthetic more than 6000 years ago. Crude anaesthetics includinf opium and alcohol were known LONG before iron age desert tribes made up the bible stories.
@@richardgregory3684 No one "made up" Bible stories. And if you don't make better choices you will find yourself in a Lake of Fire for eternity Mr. Gregory.
Cool. When God put Adam to sleep to remove his rib to make Eve. Nice.
@@HisWordisLife4U _No one "made up" Bible stories._
They're clearly made up nonsense - not evenoriginal either. Many of them are stolen from other cultures and modified to accomodate the Hebrew wargod Yahweh
_And if you don't make better choices you will find yourself in a Lake of Fire for eternity Mr. Gregory_
Your threats of a non-existant punishment in a non-existant afterlife mean nothing.
@@HisWordisLife4U you’re right, they stole them from Zoroastrianists and Mesopotamian pagans
This is exactly why I hate paleontology/paleontologists. The most manipulative field in science to ever exist.
It isn't paleontology/paleontologists who are deliberately misrepresenting the scientific facts in this video.
Thi is the sad part. You hate people you don't know because you don't want what they say to be true. That's just pathetic.
@@samburns3329 they literally did though, the grinding of the plaster of Lucy's hip bone is exactly an example of that.
@@jockyoung4491 I hate people who keep pushing lies in a grand attempt to get God out of the picture, and I hate the people who bend over and take it so that they aren't ostracized by society. You're all snakes.
@@rubenthekid
Whoever told you there were any deceptions regardling Lucy was simply lying. And we have many fossils of that species besides Lucy, so we would come to the same conclusions whether Lucy existed or not.
I can understand their wanting to ignore the truth for themselves much better than I can understand always trying to hide it from everybody else. That just shows that it’s not even about their own beliefs, it’s about trying to force others to believe what they already know isn’t true and don’t even genuinely believe themselves. It’s almost as if the existence of God is written on every single heart, believers and “non-believers” alike, just like the scripture says.
This world is ruled by the devil the great deceiver, he has influence in all high places.
Ephesians 6:12
King James Version
12 For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places.
Yes. But you know when you tell a lie you have to keep adding to it, covering it up and keep it going. You can't allow any contrary evidence to surface of you would be outted for lying--and no one would believe you. They are motivated to keep this lie alive so they have to bury all the evidence to the contrary. God made us in His image. He also said He knew us before we were knitted together in our mother's wombs...so I wonder if that means at some point our souls/spirits/ were with God before He gave us a body to grow at conception. If that is true part of us knows.
Only idiots believe in telepathic sky fairies.
So thousands are hiding the truth and some uneducated theist looser plagiarising from real scientists is telling the truth. Wow, total and profound delusion.
@@seangeorge3648 Amen 🙏
The skin colors are easy to explain... Adam was made from the earth. All around the earth you find different colors of earth.... black, white, red, yellow, brown, pink.... just like we do skin colors
The skin colors are easy to explain... Melanin helps block harmful sun rays, so people who lived in areas with a lot of sunlight evolved to have more melanin in their skin & people who lived with less sun light needed less melanin. Hence where you find certain skin types based on native origin.
@@tone9358 they didn't, 'evolve', to have more melanin, their bodies changed to increase the melanin their skin produces over generations, and this slowly changed their dna to say to make MORE melanin instead of what it was before, and when they had enough melanin their bodies stopped needing to produce more so it stopped changing their dna to tell their offspring to make even more melanin, its not adding in NEW dna, its changing the existing dna to say, "more." More of one gene
they ADAPTED to the environment, I was probably wrong about the DNA part but you get the point
The different skin colors are part of the genetic variation within the human species that has been there ever since humans were created. The sun has nothing to do with humans having different skin colors.
No
Basically all Evolutionists do is explain away creation with unproven theories and then claim there is no creation.
All scientific theories are ''unproven'' because science doesn't prove things. And you can't show anything to be a ''creation'' so therefore it remains unscientific. It's your religious beliefs, good sir.
How do you know it is an unproven theory? Did some creationist tell you that? Why are you not aware of the massive amounts of evidence for evolution, or the almost universal acceptance of eviolution among biologists?
Creationists evidence: 0
@jockyoung4491 You can not prove anything. You use evidence to support a theory and evidence against a theory to dismiss the theory.
Let me ask you this. Do you think what is presented in this video about the finds of the human evolution is true or false? If false, what is false and why?
No ''evolutionists'' are explaining away your religious beliefs that there is no evidence for. They're just explaining or following the evidence where it points. All scientific theories are ''unproven'' because science doesn't ''prove'' things. You can also totally be someone that accepts evolution and believes in a god. Man, this propaganda line is soooo tired.
Excellent presentation!
He claimed the tower of babel was built to worship the sun, and god changed their genetics to stop them. Do all of you lie about the word of god?
👏👏👏👏
🤡😂
Meh. Don't worry about that guy. He apparently has nothing better to do, today. Lol
Intentionally lying is the only way they can “legitimize” disproving creationists with their outlandish fairy tales about transforming animals.
Amen in Christ God Bless you and your whole family tree
It's really impossible to bless the Evolution tree...cause it isn't real... LOL 🤣🤣🤣
First time I've heard blessings for the whole family tree 🙂🙂😎😎🙂🙂
@@K.B.Williams cool that's how I talk and cool thanks be safe in Christ God Bless you and your whole family tree and friends same bat time same bat channel ps I'm also a walking magic book full of knowledge freely ps church member friend Wayne Berry coined me that at Good News Baptist church in Chesapeake Virginia
@@HisWordisLife4U your cool comical like David Seth kotkin Copperfield Jewish Born and Born again Christian brother in Christ and illusionist magician ps David Copperfield line have you shook hands with a duck before you still haven't its his foot:)
Mankind has created thousands of Fake Gods, none actually exist.
Anyone can draw lines on a chart connecting anything.
Good thing that's not what science is doing. Why don't you learn any of it instead of just parroting tired clichés?
But when they base it on scientific evidence it is worth considering,
@@Creationism-is-pseudoscience _"Good thing that's not what science is doing."_
It's what professional Darwin cheerleaders -- whose obedient, bootlicking shoulder-parrot you are, and whom you mindlessly, reverently misterm, "science" -- are doing. Why don't you learn that your mindless chanting of the word, "science" -- and your abuse of it in asininely using it as a label for your cherished Darwinistspeak, rather than as a label for science -- is not an argument, and is never going to be taken seriously by any rationally-thinking person?
@@jockyoung4491 _"But when they base it on scientific evidence it is worth considering"_
Since by your pronoun, "it", and your phrase, "scientific evidence", you mean Darwinistspeak, rather than any evidence, or anything scientific, here's what you've just handed us: _"But when they base [Darwinistspeak] on [Darwinistspeak] it is worth considering"._ 🤣
*You see this? This el Camino is the missing link between trucks and cars, and this tractor is the common ancestor for them all when tractors split from locomotives, crawling off the tracks and evolving rubber wheels...*
The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge.
Steven Hawking
You mean like how Creationists reject any and all evidence that contradicts their book written before we had an understanding of any scientific field at all? Yeah, great point dude 👍
@@fohrum4757 thank you for your comment & proving my comment beyond any shadow of doubt
@@matrix64 Wow, that went right over your head. I'm not shocked 😂
@@matrix64 Hey, I just learned from a book written a few thousand years ago that ancient civilizations thought gods caused thunder and lightning, so does that mean science is wrong just because an old book said so? Your answer needs to be yes. Since you prefer old books over current scientific understanding. 😂
Stephen Hawking fell prey to his own saying at the end of his life. He said that everything could come from nothing as long as there was a law of gravity. That caused a brief stunned silence in the scientific community: the law of gravity is not nothing, it is something, and therefore itself had to have an origin. Stephen Hawking shown as a bright light, but at the end that light dimmed and faded.
It is well to bear in mind that every statement by a scientist is not a scientific statement.
I dont know, but I have never believed we came from some monkey!!!
And scientists have never suggested that
Well...if you don't think we've come from monkeys, come have a look at some of my cousins! 😂
Nobody says you did. Learn the science you religiously deny.
@@Creationism-is-pseudoscience Humans didn't evolve from the monkeys we see today, but evolution theory does suggest we descend from monkeys.
@@Creationism-is-pseudosciencethere is no proof of a BIG BANG or EVOLUTION.. all theories which take more faith to believe than a Creator..
Thanks AIG 🙂🙏✝️ God bless you
They are the BEST!!!
Amen
As entertaining as ever, not a scrap of truth or evidence.
@@bobwilkinson2008I used to think like that before I was outside my physical body and now know the Bible is true
@@RichardTavilla Meaning?
As a retired Biology teacher, I actually paid some attention to what the evolutionists say. One thing that rarely gets mentioned is that there's actually very little fossil evidence (about the supposed evolution of man) to go on. ALL of the actual fossils that they have (not mockups and castings, or models) would fit on a couple of large tables. I'm speaking (okay, writing) of human and "near human" related creatures, not just apes and such.
Now fossils are both easily formed, and at the same time, difficult to get formed for a variety of reasons (check the www for info on this), and they are also notoriously difficult to find. If you don't find them laying around having been recently exposed via weathering and erosion, then you have to dig them up. There could be fossils all around you, but if you dig in the wrong place, you won't find any.
All that is to say that there's still a "Missing Link" problem with the Theory of Evolution, and regardless of what a Darwinian Acolyte will tell you; it's still a theory, even a mere hypothesis. And right out there on the edge of real science. After all, you can't test it, measure it (in most ways anyhow), and you can't replicate it.
Now someone might say that we can see evolution in action by pointing out what man has done with selective breeding (as opposed to natural selection), and they have been successful in this, but that's an example of "Micro evolution," which is true and easily observed; just look at what they have monstrously done with the dogs, and are starting to do to the cats (Shudders). Poor babies. BUT, even though they can breed a cat with no fur, tiny short legs, and wild color patterns, and similar and worse things to the puppies; they are still dogs and cats.
And I don't think they will ever manage to turn them or any other poor creature into something that is actually different no matter how much they try.
There's also the possibility of hybridization, and that occurs more often than most people know. (Check macroevolution.net) But regardless of what the guy at that website says, all the hybrids are (generally) still merely variations of kinds and types, not true change of the species.
So, no matter what you think about it one way or the other; the Biblical account is still the best explanation that we have. It's truly said that Darwinistic Evolution is as much a religion as Christianity, and it actually requires more faith, as they have much less to believe in.
The Bible is TRUE. JESUS CHRIST is really God in the flesh, and He died and was raised on the third day (as was revealed in prophecy long before it happened) to SAVE YOU from the penalty of your sins. Examine and study the Bible, and you will easily see that it is true. Don't be lost forever just because you are unwilling to examine the evidence. I was once as atheistic as you could get, but (on a bet!) was challenged to prove it false, and I became a Christian, as many thousands have done in like circumstances. Think about this if nothing else: Some of the smartest people who have ever lived have spent their entire lives over thousands of years, desperately trying to show the Bible is false and to find a fatal flaw in it and they have not been able to, and like myself, many of them have become believers. That's ALL that God is asking of us (You!) right now is to believe in Jesus Christ and His resurrection to atone for your sins, and to TRUST HIM FULLY. And if you will study the Bible and search the scriptures; you will find out that is really what He has asked for from the beginning. Trust in Him, take Him at His Word, and follow Him.
🙏✝️👑✝️🙏
_ALL of the actual fossils that they have (not mockups and castings, or models) would fit on a couple of large tables._ Sorry that is completely false. We have close to a thousand hominid fossils specimens with some over 95% complete. We have the fossils over 300 _Australopithecus_ individuals alone. As a science teacher you should be ashamed of propagating such creationist falsehoods without checking.
This is a fascinating post. The evidence for evocation from the fossil record is overwhelming.
But let’s put that aside. As a biology teacher how can you discard dna sequencing?
@@itsamystery5279 of the tens of millions of species that ever existed the number you claim as Amir pittance, particularly in Light of the huge number that would be required as evidence of the evolution of even one species - And even that doesn’t exist. If it isn’t an outright lie, it is a deliberate misrepresentation to represent extinct species (whether as casting or the real thing) and leave people to believe that the evidence of extinction is actually the evidence of evolution. This is what I keep hearing from those who believe in evolution. There are young people who are misled by elementary and grade school teachers to believe that every fossil is evidence of evolution. Such is not the case, and that evolution happens every time a species gives birth to a new generation. Young people are led to believe that a single example such as tiktaalik, Australopithecus afarensis, archeopteryx et al Is “proof” of evolution, that it is a “transitional species” when it is nothing other than an individual example. I grew up as an agnostic who believes in evolution, but I abandoned it because the evidence just wasn’t - and still isn’t - existent. This kind of educational malfeasance has produced a paper, thin façade of credibility - and you wonder why can poke holes in it so easily. To stop spreading misers about evolution you must start by telling the truth to yourself .
@@denvan3143 The only one telling outright lies here is you. You better hope He11 isn't a real place or you'll be burning for a long long time.
Thank you for your comment. An episode of _Nova_ in the 1970s showed a “boned jamboree“, paleontologist from around the world who brought together the physical evidence for evolution. It was in response to a challenge by creationist to “show the bones“. I was shocked; it only mounted to about a dozen boxes, and in them were fragments of skulls, a few ribs, and in some cases only one arm or leg or not even that. It was a pitifully small display. I have been led to believe there was a lot more evidence than that. This was the best they could do in the face of the challenge from the creationists. It was not impressive.
On the subject of selective breeding: while Darwin took his queue from what the breeders had accomplished with domestic animals, he either was ignorant of or ignored the findings of the breeders when they pushed their livestock past a certain extreme. One of three things would happen:
(1) The offspring would be born sterile, there would be no further breeding in that direction.
(2) The offspring would be born dead or die shortly after birth; another block to advancing the read along those lines.
(3) The offspring would “revert to type”, and appearance be exactly like the parents stock with no evidence of Phina typical traits. of course, genetic science we had no idea why this happened.
So the problem the breeders found was you can’t push species past a certain point. Darwin ignore these three roadblocks in the way of micro evolution to becoming macro evolution. Animals may change their traits to some degree but they still remain largely as they are, they “stay in their lane“.
My parents stopped going to church when I was nine, for which I was grateful, but in my early teens, I began to read the Bible as a point of interest. I began to attend a protestant church in my late teens, made a public profession of Jesus Christ and was baptized in the church. Some years later, I had a serious conversation with God - or rather, I talked, and he, presumably, listened. At one point, I expressed my dissatisfaction with my life, with myself, that I wanted more from life, that I wanted more from God and that I wanted him to have more of me.
That changed my life. That moment changed my life. God came into the midst of my being, he gave me a revelation of himself. I was amazed; I wasn’t expecting any such thing. But I was them and now forever grateful that the God who made the universe, the creator everything would come to me as my Lord Jesus Christ. I knew it anything and everything I could do would not nearly be enough to repay him for what he had done and coming into my life, but I knew that I would try.
Oh yes: concerning evolution: before I became a Christian, I talked to a man who was a Christian as to what I was to do about the “scientific proof“ evolution. He laughed, told me to do my research and figured out for myself. I did. Evolution is a tattered, threadbare Façade. When I investigated the claims, examine the evidence, I simply laughed and walked away from the concept. Evolution is for the easily impressed.
God bless you, thank you for your years as a teacher, and perhaps we will know one another in Heaven.
A lot of people assume all scientists are intelligent but in fact most just have good memories. I personally think intelligence requires critical thinking, open mindedness and honesty and I know for a fact that these people will dispose of evidence that contradicts established theories as they face peer pressure if they don't tow the party line.
When I was getting my degree in archaeology, two of my lecturer told us to remember that evolution is just a theory and that much of the evidence is based on people simply wanting to have their name in print lying.
Those two were shuffled off soon after that.
Yes, I agree and Evolution is also one grand delusion. These are people who actually know that God exists, but would rather defy the Law of our Creator and all He created.
I believe the same. I think it's part of the strong delusion to believe a lie.
Science denier showing his disdain and misunderstanding of science once again. Understanding science and believing in your creator are not two mutually exclusive ideas.
What does God have to do with it. Evolution does not say there is no God. Whether God exists or not, biological evolution happened and continues to happen. It's just a fact.
You can believe what you want. The evidence says evolution is true.
yes exactly and the people who believe it deny science
Very good presentation. Thank you
03:50 the deception sorrounding Lucy
Where exactly is the deception?
@@Creationism-is-pseudoscience A deceived fool wrote: _"Where exactly is the deception?"_
You, by your reaction, show yourself to be an example of it.
The irony of the 'missing link' that supposedly dispels God and the whole Creation Account, being named "Lucy" still shocks me. I always wondered why that name was chosen. This name keeps popping up- E.g Remember, Lucy in the sky with diamonds- who is this "Lucy"? We were told this line in the song stands for LSD, but does it?
Is it short for another name? If the missing link was a male,what would he have been named? What is the male form of Lucy? Who named it Lucy? Everything is named for a reason...
@@joeythebushkangaroo1 well funny you bring up the male question because there are a number of people who think it is male and not female. Yet I think the brain what they found of the skull anyway is about the size of a chimp.
There was no 'deception'. Her pelvis had been squashed and deformed by the sediment she was found in. But it was obvious to anyone who knows anything about anatomy that her hip joints wouldn't have fitted and worked with the pelvis as it was found, the angles were wrong. Plus there's the little fact that she had LOCKING knee joints, something which is needed for upright bipedal locomotion. Plus the shape of her feet etc etc. The pelvis was re-constructed to its correct shape, the shape which it would have been in life. That's all. Also, if you could be bothered to look it up and find out about it, it's not like Lucy is the only specimen we have of her species. She was merely the first that was found, which is why she's important. But there are many more, several of them pretty much complete. And you can see the structure of their hips and pelvis.
The big lie of evolutioism has been a touch stone to examine if the tested has normal reason or not. The reality is not happy-many have believed this lie, including me before Jesus opened my spiritual eyes.
There is nothing illogical about biological evolution. Science and reason are how we learned that evolution happens.
So I scientist comes upon a rock formation that god created 30 years earlier. How old do you think the scientist will date the mountain to be?
@@jockyoung4491 Do u think it is logical and reasonable to decide a person or a being's appearance and bodily structure, which lived hundreds of thousand years ago, only from a tooth? Any normal detect and judge will condemn you as illogical and ridiculous.
@@jimmock1155 How does the scientist know it is created by God 30 years ago? Here is a serious discussion on life, not a place to spit out anything from too much alcohol.
@@jockyoung4491 your statement is incorrect. Science is what is observable; evolution is not seen in nature, it is not observed in the fossil record, and it is not found in laboratory experimentation. Because there is no evidence, evolution is not science, it is a belief system.
A new book "Darwin's Bluff: The mystery of the Book Darwin never finished" proves that the 'Origin of Species was full of errors in logic, and Darwin knew it, and terrified that would be his embarrassment. That's why Darwin referred the 'Origin merely as an 'Abstract.' [an outline] It was an incomplete explanation of his theory, and he promised to issue a more complete examination of his theory...but never did! He stalled for decades and then died without publishing it. The question is, Why? This is a must read, and reveals that Darwin knew he was foisting a fraudulent and unprovable theory, but was consumed with being thought of as a great scientist.
wrong!
Written by a Phd professor in religion. Not a historian, not a biologist just some angry religious dude.
Honestly who cares about darwin he was just the first to take a guess at what the puzzle peices might mean.
Evolutionary science has progressed in the last 160 years.
@@bighairyviking387 😂😂😂
None of that is true, of course, but what difference would it make? Science would make evolution obvious whether Darwin ever existed or not.
05:47 the classification process for fossils needs to be completely redone
It is modified all the time as new evidence emerges. But the basic methids are logical and solid.
@@jockyoung4491Like the evolution of spelling of "methods" to "methids"? Yes, I see your point; methids is much more logical and solid.😊
@@jockyoung4491 no
@@markenge9348 do you feel good about your comment? Like you achieved something? The persons message got across so what if they hit the wrong key they are right next to each other.
@@jockyoung4491 _"It is modified all the time as new evidence emerges."_
Here, you advertise that your thinking about the nature of evidence is irrational and worse than useless. You are asininely claiming that evidence can/does support false propositions. And, you are asininely misusing the word, "evidence", to refer to Darwinistspeak, instead of to evidence.
01:05 evolution tree of life
Creation forest of life
I have done my fair share of teaching and preaching. My takeaway from that experience is that people choose what they want to believe, rather than go with the facts. People typically choose what they want based on what they like, and not on what the actual facts tell them. Perhaps this is why YEHOVAH said in the book of Enoch , " I am going to test mankind and find out which of Adam's race truly loves me ". Oh, and by the way... that statement right there gives us the meaning of life. We are here to be tested, to find out who really loves YEHOVAH!
so basically scientists can''t decide on what they want our "ancestors" to look like
If a Church goes against the Bible, and says there wasn't no Adam or Eve. They are not Christian. You can not be Christian and go against the Bible. There is no metaphorical speaking there because actual names are used. It's literal. No way around that. Who else twisted scripture? Satan when he tempted Jesus Christ. How did Jesus respond? With correct interpretation of scripture. Thanks for the great video. God bless.
Agreed.we are in the doctrine of demons times now
So everything is literal?
John 6:56
56 Whoever eats my flesh and drinks my blood remains in me, and I in them. 57 Just as the living Father sent me and I live because of the Father, so the one who feeds on me will live because of me. 58 This is the bread that came down from heaven. Your ancestors ate manna and died, but whoever feeds on this bread will live forever.” 59 He said this while teaching in the synagogue in Capernaum.
1 Peter 5:13
She who is in Babylon, elect together with you, greets you; and so does Mark my son.”
Babylon was destroyed by then.
Scripture tells us a day is one thousand years, one thousand years is one day.
Please note this is argument has been going on for a while you can trace as early as 155.
Also remember we are saved by grace, through faith, not by how smart we are.
So Adam and Eve were the proconsul of left diagram at 1:50 .
@@globalcoupledances Show me a half man half monkey in transformation since everything in random and evolved. Everything wouldn't evolve at the same time. Adam and Eve were created. Just as the monkey was created. If you can't show me proof of the evolution in progress. Just 1 monkey transforming into a human. I stick with God created humans and animals like The Holy Bible says.
@@globalcoupledances No everything isn't literal. Some literal some metaphorical. When Jesus Christ used real names or God Almighty. Them things were literal. All real named people was people that lived. Did what they did. Eat my flesh and drink my blood is symbolic. So are the others. Metaphorical from what I read. Let me ask you this. How did Satan tempted Jesus Christ? With scripture. How did Jesus Christ respond? With correct scripture in correct context. Even so it is it these days in these comments. God bless all who have The Holy Ghost. Because they aren't deceived by the snares of Satan. I am just a servant, brother, teacher and follower of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ. I am no better then the least of true Christians. I teach by measure by measure given to me by God and The power of The Holy Spirit. I can do nothing of my own. I can do all things through him that strengthens me. Guides me. Gives me my words through Spirit in the hour. God bless.
The lies and misrepresentations in this video are done by *Answers In Genesis* to feed their mushrooms.
Thank you, Dr Mortenson, for the clear expose of evolutionary man, and the truth of the Gospel.
An unsaved person can't be forgiven and repent because they don't have the Holy Spirit to vouch for it, or aid in it; so how can we ask for forgiveness in the beginning, or in the middle, of the process of getting saved? You have to do that after being saved in order to be forgiven. God calls us, that are saved, to ask for forgiveness and repent, but God practically already forgives us before we even ask. Our sins are buried under Christ Jesus's blood, we are no longer bond away from God anymore; He has His grip on us and "no one" can pluck us out. We have eternal life, and it is was it says. We will never be unsaved, without true life, again.
Let me know when you find a large mammal and large non-avian dinosaur in the same formation, then we'll talk.
Pretty weird that certain species of different lineages are only found in particular strata, eh? Take ichthyosaurs and whales.
Their morphologies (structure of the organism) are very convergent, so theres no reason that they'd be in completely seperare rock strata if they coexisted.
That would mean one species was sepultated first, not that the latter is the descent of it. That's quite the hasty conclusion and confirmation bias you got there.
@@luis-sophus-8227 I'm not talking about species ancestry at all. ALL ichthyosaurs, which are built much like whales, are buried in rock layers below ALL fossil whales. If they were all buried at the same time in a Worldwide Flood, that's a pretty big coincidence they aren't mingled in the fossil record.
@@gecko-saurus Not necessarily a flood, or that type of flood, like Christians said. What I think is that you should verify your ideas by yourself. Paleonthologists are known for not being sincere. Dinos aren't real to me, I see them as pretty much another fraud for the most part, in this case I don't know what dino are you talking about, they will distort their findings to their convenience, that's what I've learnt.
@@luis-sophus-8227sepultated?
AiG, you have been a massive resource for me for much of my life. You are the reason I wanted to get into creation science. I still think you have every intention to help the church and that you have helped millions of people. But you need to stop this kind of stuff. No, Donald Johanson and Owen Lovejoy did not manipulate Lucy's pelvis. No, evolutionists were not intentionally lying about this. Hold a Lucy cast in your hand and compare it with chimp and human pelves--it is obvious that what Johanson and Lovejoy did was totally okay. They did not manipulate the evidence. They made a reconstruction (using a plaster cast, not the original) by removing the effects of taphonomic distortion. This is a completely normal practice and it doesn't really depend on a person's worldview. Paleontologists do it all the time on fossils that really have no bearing on the creation/evolution issue at all. Watch the video the creationist channel PaleoLogos just released and see it for yourself.
"creation science" - LOL.
0:17 we are apes
2:05 so you believe that the fossils are real but not the genetic evidence or radiometric dating?
2:18 the difference is that creationists ignore whatever evidence conflicts with their worldview.
3:39 no she absolutely was not a knuckle walker. No scientist thinks that. Their hind legs were long and their forelegs short, their knees were bowed, their shoulders were rounded, their hips were deep and bowl shaped, their face was flat. All traits of bipedalism. Also, we have fossilised footprints which are way older that show bipedal walking. It makes more sense that humans evolved bipedalism and kept it, than to say that bipedalism evolved, then humans became quadruple again, only to then become bipedal again.
4:53 if you find a bone with a fault in it, you’d want to know what an intact specimen would look like. And with medical technology we can correct faults.
5:02 that is EXACTLY what you are doing here.
i am going to copy and paste this all over this comment section
@@Ledinosour673 ok
because of the position of the foramen magnum, Lucy could not be a knuckle walker.
Young Earth Creationism claims the Earth is 6,000-10,000 years old, but extensive evidence from radiometric dating, geological strata, and astronomical observations consistently show the Earth is 4.5 billion years old and the universe is 13.8 billion years old.
“extensive evidence” from sources who worldview is naturalistic. Radiometric dating operates from assumptions, that the decay rates don’t change. All the daughter isotopes from a sample are derived from the parent and is assumed no contamination. The kicker is the inconsistency, for example Mt. St. Helens lava sample was radiometric tested and came back with two results. One at 500k and the other was 1.1 myo, when the rock wasn’t even 40 years old. Then you have to deal with dinosaur soft tissue which has been carbon dated to a range of 1k to 30k not the 10s of myo that you were told. Your statement is nothing more than a truth claim which was derived from your naturalistic worldview. Based on scientific evidence the opposite is true as the Bible claims. Investigate for yourself.
@BeheldtheSerpentSTEAMAcademy well there is something called dating the Bible gets history wrong with very little true
@@BeheldtheSerpentSTEAMAcademy (Facepalm) Oh please, not this same old horsecrap where creationists sent fresh lava to be dated and demanded the lab use the *wrong method* (K/Ar) guaranteed to return bad results. 🙄
I Just Cant With This,Thank God I Was Born Into A Christian Home,Where Creation Was Taught From Day One❤️🪽🙏🏻
Brainwashed from an early age, that's how they get ya turned into a good little sheep.
Even when I was in school, I could always tell whenever the scientists and other teachers were lying. Whenever they say that something is millions of years old or some other large number, then I knew and even know today that they are lying because according to the bible the earth is no more than 10,000 years old so whenever they say that something was millions of years old I just have to laugh at them because they obviously don't know the bible.
When the teachers say evolution is millions and millions of year old. I just say God's way older than that.
A God that only exists for 10.000 years s a tiny God. A God that deserves admiration is billion years old
I love the video clip of the guy using his grinder to "correct" the bone . The buzzing grinder noise just cracks me up! It was tough to stop chuckling. I take my bicycle to the bike shop with a flat tire "Don't worry I can fix it!" , fires up his chop saw .. bzzzzeeeeeooowwww. "Here's your unicycle back!"
You guys really need to do some research before posting. Reconstructing deformed fossils is a common practice in paleontology since finding deformed fossils is so common. One well known example is the famous T-rex skeleton "Sue" at the Chicago Field Museum. Sue's original skull was found on its side squashed to around half its original width. A cast was made, cut up and reassembled to show the actual skull dimensions. You just don't hear creationists screaming about it like they scream about Lucy because the Sue fossil didn't threaten their religious "humans are SPECIAL!" beliefs
@@sciencerules2825@3:45ish mark - 1994 Nova TV series on human origins. The scientists find Lucy's hip bone broken in half and the pieces fit perfectly together - "The perfect fit was an illusion that made Lucy's hip bone seem to flare out like a chimp's. But all was not lost."
Bzzzzeeeeeooowwww!
Ah , yup, still cracks me up!
Come on bro, that's good comedy!
The pieces fit perfectly together, and it looks a heck of a lot like a chimp's hip bone but then I don't get to use my buz saw!
I Love what you do and I've had so many questions, but I feel that that's the point. Christ Said, "Seek FIRST the Kingdom of God(The Kingdom of God is within you/in your midst) and HIS Righteousness(what HE Considers "Good") and everything you need will be Given to you.", my Heart still seeks answers but Knows the Truth that Christ IS Lord, the Character/NAME of YHWH in the Flesh. Amen. Thank you for the Truth or "Light" that you share. Bless your Heart and mission in Christ Jesus Amen 🙏
Already you lost me in the first minute by claiming “evolutionists like to use that picture” NO THEY DONT. That image is an EXTREMELY oversimplified image made to help people grasp the concept. not ONE SINGLE biologist uses that image as an accurate and valid description of evolution. It’s DECADES OLD and probably wasn’t even considered accurate back when it was first made.
It’s a cartoon. Like Jesus holding the AR-15 with mirror shades.
Yes it's proven to be especially effective propaganda for children.
The cartoon is a rare concept evolutionist and creationist can agree on-- we agree that figure is inaccurate.
Then it should be out of the text books. It should no longer be shown and taught
@@jameswbuchananjr It hasn't been in textbooks except as a historical reference for over 50 years. It was never taught as an actual detailed human history.
dunning - kruger in action
We live in a world of big lies. God bless.
Doctrine of demons times right now
One thing that gets me with the classification of various human "species" such as Neanderthal and Cro-Magnon is that someone looked at skeletal remains and acknowledged their differences and determined that they must be of a different species than modern humans. Why don't we do the same with various human skeletal structures today? For example: the Dinka tribe. Would you look at the skeletal structure of a Dinka and the skeletal structure of an Irishman and note differences? Are they of separate species? Evolutionists would say the Dinkas have evolved to be longer limbed like a cheetah due to their environment. However a hop, skip, and a stone's throw away is the Pygmy tribe. Scientists will say that diversity equals evolution. But then, why are there no boundaries placed between the two categorically? "We call that race" some might say. But wouldn't that be racism? Why are they both just as human as you or I, though significantly unique from all other humans, but the Neanderthal isn't? And yet the majority of Europeans carry Neanderthal DNA. But the Neanderthal is a "subset" of human. If there is something I'm missing, please correct me. Are all mankind of equality or not? Could the Neanderthal just be of another "race"? Who creates these terms and categories? If mankind would just view mankind as mankind and quit forging divisions we would create a lot less problems for ourselves. God told Adam to name (categorize) the animals. Somehow mankind fell into the category of animals and is now categorized within itself.
The idea of a "human," so far as it is understood today in bio-anthropology, is literally anything within the genus _Homo._ Everything from modern _Homo sapiens_ to the most primitive members of _H. habilis_ which blur the line on what exactly defines a human. As for Cro-Magnon? That's a population of _H. sapiens,_ named for their location and famed for being among the earliest examples found of fossils of our species from that time. Neanderthals? Morphology and genetics confirms them as a different species from us. And yes, "us" means all living humans, even those as seemingly-distinct as an Irishman and some random African tribesman.
Don't forget the DNA evidence. DNA analysis shows modern humans and Neanderthals shared a common ancestor roughly 550,000 years ago. The two species could (and did) still interbreed but are genetically distinct from one another.
Grind it til it fits 😂
The bone was re-shaped and corrected because it had been squashed and deformed. It was obvious that the angle it was at could not have worked with the hip joint. What is also being left out in this deliberate misrepresentation is the fact that the specimen had feet shaped for upright walking and locking knee joints, which are an adaptation specifically required for bipedal posture. Oh, plus the inconvenient fact quite a number of other fossilised skeletons of her kind have been discovered, several complete or near-complete, and we can compare their anatomical configuration.
@@diarmuidkuhle8181and there's some swampland you might be interested in buying!😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅 GULLIBLE AND SAD😢
The broken pieces fit perfectly together "the perfect fit was an illusion that made Lucy's hip bone seem to flare out like a chimp's. But all was not lost."
Bzzzzeeeeeooowwww!
Great comedy
Love it
11:43 Jeffry Tompkins bastardized his own research to get 85%. He did several things wrong, one of the main things being used ungapped instead of gapped parameters when sequencing which for simplicity makes something like (abcdef) vs (abccef) only 50% similar instead of 83%. Gutsick Gibbon did some video's covering it but Jeffry either is the worlds worst scientist or he was purposefully screwing up to get a result closer to what he wanted.
No support of evolution often leads to no funding... and scientists like to eat, and sleep indoors, so they sell out.
Leaky's comments make sense (not accurate, but make sense). His definitive statement was in a general purpose, general audience offering. The masses must not ever be presented with anything but metaphysical certitude. The "not sure" comment was in a targeted "scientific" publication. He was in an ideological safe space, so he was free to voice concerns (not doubts, though) about what hadn't yet been found. "Hey, guys, if someone would be so kind as to "find" (wink wink) such a skeleton, it would allow us to help fill in some "gaps" with the masses!"
He knows how to read the room. I'll give him that.
Yes, all of the scientists in the world are dishonest and conspiratorial just because that is what YOU need to believe.
The arguments that different humans are different evolutions is so wrong. They are nothing more than regional adaptations.
oh the irony 🙄
My 2nd grader figured this out. One day he's said. Mom? If we came from monkeys why are there still monkey's today? Lol
That’s the thing about 2nd graders. They haven’t yet studied biology, they are only in second grade!
Eventually, if they are not home schooled, they will learn about biology, science and evolution. And understand that we don’t descend from the chimpanzees or monkeys we see today, but rather from a primitive ape, different from any ape or monkey we see today. And all monkeys and apes descend from more primitive monkeys and apes. Hence the family tree.
It really isn’t hard to understand!
If poodles came from wolves, why are there still wolves? If we have smartphones now, why do landline phones still exist? I just love that creationists ''disproving'' all of science is just them proudly stating they have no idea what it is or what it says.
Evolutionists had to change their narrative because 2nd-graders started pointing out the obvious fatal flaws in the evolution story. So now they refer to the mysterious "LUCA;" the Last Universal Common Ancestor. Don't ask them what that is though; just take their word for it. 😂
@@Creationism-is-pseudoscience If Australians came from Englishmen why are there still Englishmen? 🙂
@@myfakeguuglaccount8307 What incident are you referring to? And that's just how science works, hahaha. If something is shown to be incorrent, or inaccurate the science changes to accomodate the new findings. Your incredulity, denial and disdain for science is showing.
I dont find that excerpt from Charles Darwin book, can anyone help?
Overturning previous thought with new evidence is what science does and is not a detriment....rather it is its strength.....to adapt to new findings...get it?
Basically it was a coordinated effort to shut the possibility of creation out.
Microsoft Excell annd Microsoft Powerpoint must also be descended from some common ancestor. There's so much common code.
There must have been millions of random hard drive errors, and a more sophisticated program emerged as a result. If you leave it on for a few years, it surely will evolve into an intelligence far superior to us.
Why did he reference the Dead Sea Scrolls, when a vast majority turned out to be fake? So much credibility lost right then and there.
Putting a reference that doesn't even exist in a video...didn't your little god make a rule that says "don't lie" or something?
08:18 piltdown man
Creationists won't discuss any of the evidence for evolution, instead they'll endlessly harp on the Piltdown man which other scientists exposed like 80 years ago as though scientists scrutinizing each other's work shows all of evolution is a fraud, or something.
Was refuted BY SCIENTiSTS
@jockyoung4491 yeah, TRUST THE SCIENCE!!!
@@troywalstra9300 Yeah. The trust the overwhelming, demonstrable science that self-corrects and not religious preachers intentionally deceiving you about it.
@Laughingatsciencedeniers if you want to believe you're just a glorified monkey, knock yourself out. What a useless depressing existence here today dead tomorrow, and for what purpose? What is human life? What's the difference between a dead human and a live one? What makes us human our outward appearance, or is the intangible that makes up our mind, our conscience? What leaves a person at the moment of death? A spirit? Do you comfort a dying loved one by saying 'sorry for your luck, evolution hasn't figured out how to defeat death yet, maybe in another billion years'. Life is but a vapor. Live your best life now while you still have time. Eternity is only a missed heartbeat away. Where are you going to spend it?
Side note; how many c h i n e s e v i r u s boosters did you take? Remember, it's all about trusting the science.
Thank you Ken Ham and AiG staff for your faithfulness. Praise God for raising such a ministry like AiG and Living Waters.
It's the evillusionauts'' Abbey Rd.
We choose to believe, from the heart, then God imparts faith to grow in Him and all truth. We have no natural faith to boast of until God gives it. Great lecture though 😊
God made us in His image and gave us self awareness and a brain... and free will. If I se a building, I don't need to see someone building it to know there was indeed a builder. If you look at creation, the same thing occurs to everyone, whether they admit it or not.
The magical sky fairy! 😂
😅
What evidence would be needed to convince you that evolution is true?
They would need to see a giraffe evolve into a rutabaga. In real time. In front of them. That or a crocoduck. 😅
according to some creationists, a monkey giving birth to an human.
@@luish1498 lol that's a little harsh.. Indoctrination aside.. no one is that ignorant
@@Redx3257 you can find that commentaries in this channel!!! or a dog give birth to a cat in KH channel!!
Why then is not every geological formation and every stratum full of such intermediate links? Geology assuredly does not reveal any such finely graduated organic chain; and this, perhaps, is the most obvious and gravest objection which can be urged against my theory. The explanation lies, as I believe, in the extreme imperfection of the geological record. Charles Darwin (1859), The Origin of Species, p. 280.
Find me a whole bunch of verifiable transitionary fossils and we can talk, because that would be explosive macro-evolution evidence.
To sum up what the lost world says and will always say!
Luke 19:14 ESV
But his citizens hated him and sent a delegation after him, saying, 'We do not want this man to reign over us.'
I would love to see a great video like this one (excellently pieced together with music that doesn't drown out the speaker-bonus) end without the abruptness.
Do you refer to those who accept the theory of gravity as the best explanation for why objects with mass are attracted to other objects with mass as "gravitationalists"?
Or do you only make up cute little names for people when the scientific theories they've been convinced are true run headlong into the super natural myths and assertions you were trained to have faith in
Nobody has proved mass attracts mass
@@luis-sophus-8227Except we have. Even heard of the Cavendish experiment?
@@shmoese Yes. Most inconsistent results even acknowledge by that chineselooking physicist. Tell me the part where I care about pseudoscience. Vague and unpredictable measurements.
This is rather caused by static electricity and the most subtle disbalances (unperceivable to us) in the device, not g.
@@shmoese Except *WE*
You have done nothing. you don't belong to any scientific group, stop thinking of "scientists" (metaphysicists) as your comrades, stop thinking we as a collective have achieved something. They aren't your friends. Get the idea of "WE" out of your head, and stop watching science fiction films
@@luis-sophus-8227 In world is the Cavendish experiment pseudo-science? Sure, the original experiment had problems, but the gravitational constant Cavendish calculated is consistent with Newton's law of universal gravitation. Since then, the experiment has been performed thousands of times in universities all across the world with significantly better technology, and every single time it produces consistent results that align with universal gravitation. That is the furthest thing from "vague and unpredictable". And no, the results aren't caused by static electricity. Static electricity accounted for during the experimented through grounding and shielding.
re: Piltdown Man...the leading naturalist at Cambridge had his doubts about the demensions of the skull almost from the beginning....again tell the audience that!
Really good. More focused. Direct and hard hitting. A little faster moving. More interesting. Great job.
I'm not a religious man, but is true, I believe current science need a lot of imagination and mental gymnastics in order to work 😒
Just no evidence whatsoever. Darwin proved animals adapt and the good adaptations are perpetuated in the species (natural selection); he never proved one animal changes into another animal--it never happened.
All I can do is shake my head everytime some fool says "they came down out of the trees and began to live in caves."
And WHAT in the world compelled ALL of them to do THAT - as a species?
And why didn't all the other apes follow suit?
It was a slow process
@@donettaschroeder5895do you think that all species of apes live in the same same environments, have the same diets, why would you think that all of them would do the same things?
They didn't all do that. That's why there are still apes in trees.
@@donettaschroeder5895 Why would they? That's like saying all humans should have moved to America at the same time.
My dear friend G. S. grew up in Pasadena, CA listening to the Leakey s at her kitchen table.
Her sister was an illustrator for their anthropological studies.
Dr. Terry Mortenson holds an MDiv and a PhD in the history of geology..
So, why is he talking about biological evolution like this? Scientists know better than to do this, to speak about subjects outside their area or field of work, and here this guy is, doing a lecture on the topic.
I'll say it again, in case you missed it in my previous comments:
The March of Progress illustration is not an accurate representation of biological evolution, and this is well known amongst people who understand the subject. It's one of the first things I learned when I started learning about human evolution.
You know what that means, right? It means this dude is lying, just like he accuses biologists of doing.
Answers in Genesis videos talking about scientists lying.. Wow. Do you think they'll upload a video that corrects some of the misinformation in this video??
Answers in Genesis are deleting comments that debunk the misrepresentations in this video. Why do they dislike freedom of speech so much?
Google/TH-cam are deleting comments; your powers of observation have failed you. If you look at videos on all subjects, you will see comments that previous comments were deleted. I’ve had that experience myself and more frequently in recent months. Your assumption that this was done by AIG is no different in degree or kind and evolutionists who pre-suppose evolution on the basis of no more evidence than you present for why your comments are deleted.
At the top of the comments section you have xxxx comments just next to that there are 3 little lines sort by, click on them and select newest first, only problem then is you have to scroll through everything to find the comment you're looking for.
@@VisshanVis I did that. The comments no longer exist in my own comment history. They've been deleted by AiG. I am not the only person to see this happening on AiG videos. They can't accept freedom of speech.
Race is not "just" about skin colour.
With different skin colour comes different features and sizes;
Limbs, torso, shoulders, buttocks, breasts, hair, sweat glands, skull and of course every facial feature.
Also; You say, People from hotter parts of Earth developed darker skin.
I wonder how many generation would it take to develope darker skin.
9 years ago i was in Australia talking to a white guy about this. He was decendent from the early British colonialists to Australia. His great great (i dont know how many greats) Grandparents were white as were all generations between them and himself. At a guess, I'd say about 12+ generations.
They are still white with no sign of darkening skin.
I agree, I don't think the environment changes the genes. A "white" person who has sex with another "white" person for generations, even in a sun-scorched land, will still have "white" children. The sun has nothing to do with it. But I also don't think "race", as described by Darwin, even exists as a thing. But that's another discussion.
The answer is they don't really know. Look at mendelson's theory of genetics to get an idea of how skin, hair and eye traits are passed from parents to kids. Adaptation just means that people may have produced incremental changes that made heir survival easier/better and natural selection perpetuated that trait and phased out the rest. Don't the indigenous people of Australia have super dark skin? Each incremental change takes a very long time. But that is assuming we all started out with the same color skin to start with...Maybe Adam was white and Eve was black, we just have no way of knowing really. Unless we keep mapping the DNA until we can figure it out. Maybe they know already. 💞
One thing we do know and that is the biochemical aspects of the body change according to the climate human's move to. The saturated fat and unsaturated fat ratios in cell membranes change according to the warmth or coldness of a climate.
@@pakenhamin Humans adapt just like animals and plants/insects/ viruses...all of it. God put that into the mix when He created all forms of life.
I didn't know until the very end that I was dealing with a jesus freak.
Posted an hour ago and 99 comments many from the godless.
I only disbelieve in one less god then you. So that makes you just as godless
🔥👹🔥
AI is pretty godless...
@@krunkcleanup2949programmed by man.. every man has a spirit.. evolutionists discount anything spiritual..
ok, but the idea that the earth is only 6k years old is demonstrably false.
Can you demonstrate?
@@jameswade9534 _Can you demonstrate?_ Yes. In Japan there is a lake, Lake Suigetsu, which has over 150,000 yearly varves as determined by visual counting. They are known to form yearly because each year has two distinct bands - a summer dust layer and a winter diatom bloom layer. Interspersed with these 150,000 varve layers are 30 layers of ash from local volcanos which erupted in those 150,000 years. The ash was dated with Ar/Ar methodology and the dates agreed with the visually counted ages to greater than 0.1 percent. See the paper
*Identification and correlation of visible tephras in the Lake Suigetsu SG06 sedimentary archive, Japan: chronostratigraphic markers for synchronising of east Asian/west Pacific palaeoclimatic records across the last 150 ka*
There we have two independent corroborating sources showing the Earth *at a minimum* is 150,000 years old. 150,000 is much older than 6000. 🙂
@@jameswade9534 Ice cores from Greenland and Antarctica. Sediment layers in the Grand Canyon. Just for starters.
I believe in a God do powerful that he can create anything just like described in Genesis. If you read it he didn’t create a new earth, he created a self sustaining one. An earth that could sustain all the animals and plants that were created. One that could sustain an adult male and female.
@@ejvaz13 Sure, but a new earth could sustain life just as well. Why make it look like there was 2 billion years of unicellular life followed by another 1.5 billion years of simpler multicellularity before the Cambrian radiation?
I actually knew that. My brother Alex Petrich told me, according to the Bible.
We aint lying. We standing, no, we flyin
The video began with a lie "Evolutionists love to use this picture (the march of progress) as proof we came from an ape-like creature" to add to that they then shown Darwin knowing the picture didn't exist until the 1960's.
Because Darwin proved adaptation not evolution. He proved animals adapted and he proved natural selection, which is very different from evolution. Some scientists have been supporting this theory without any evidence for decades. The pictures have been getting sneakier and sneakier over the years--it doesn't mean they have proof of anything.
@@HisWordisLife4U Adaptation is literally evolution. You just refuse to accept that.
@@Woopor I am not refusing to accept it, I am rejecting it on scientific principles--no evidence and logic. Darwin proved finches adapted on isolated island to eat various food sources....but they never changed into any other animal. No one is arguing animals can't adapt, or people don't adapt. But Darwin's finches STAYED finches. They never changed into any other animal. Not ever. Neither have any other animals changed into any other kind of animal. We know all dogs came from wolves, but that is not that much of a difference, not really. You can even see wolf like tendencies and similarities in a tea cup poodle. It's observable.
Sure they're may be evolutionists that say that lucy was knuckle walker but they would be incorrect. The short video clips shown about lucy's reconstruction which is that it would be an anatomical impossibility for it to be like chimp
The many specimens of the species that includes Lusy is very clearly bipedal. They probably also spent some time in trees, but suggesting they were knucle walkers is enmbarrasingly ignorant, and no biologist has EVER made that claim.
there*
Lucy was created from Chimp bones---pure immagination...no evidence at all. none.
They created her reconstruction. I believe they found two finger bones...so there is no way they could prove she was bipedal. Chimps do walk for short periods on two feet but it is not their preferred mode of travel for long.
@@HisWordisLife4U
The Lucy specimen is about 40% complete, so a lot of the info about the species comes from the hundreds of other individuals that have been found. Plenty to know that they were bipedal much of the time but also were still adapted to tree climbing.
I saw that Lucy replica and instantly I said "Uh uh, I did NOT come from that. That's disgusting."
Cool, you can go with the bible and go and look at a pile of dirt and believe you came from that then.
I find it amazing that evillusionists are even capable of having a thought and why they are proud of their conjectures.
They have been brainwashed for generations; until they get new information, they have nothing else to go on. That is where we come in... unless they just don't want to be accountable for their sin, then God will give them what they seek-- a life in eternity without Him.
@@HisWordisLife4U Brainwashed for generations is what religion is
Lucy = short for Lucifer… They always indirectly reveal themselves. That’s the spiritual law.
It was called Lucy because Lucy in the Sky with Diamonds by the Beatles was playing on the radio after they discovered the fossil.
@@VisshanVis that would make even more sense since cover of the album that the song is from shows Aleister Crowley. The self proclaimed 666 beast
@@Nahchomama LOL He is just 1 of the 71 people depicted on the cover you morons are just so gullible.
@@Nahchomama And you think that is evidence against evolution?
@@slang1517 it’s evidence the foundation of science as we know it, was founded by luciferians. Theory of evolution is brought to you by luciferians. Lucifer is an entity of deception. “Theory” of evolution evolution is just that, a theory of deception
06:45 neanderthal man
Amen. Keep preaching truth!
This content is so so so valuable. God bless yall for that!
Wonderful. and much needed. Jesus said my people are perishing for lack of knowledge... Here is some knowledge to defend our faith.
@@HisWordisLife4U "faith" - the excuse given for belief when there's no evidence (unlike evolution for which there's overwhelming evidence for and none against)
@@bobwilkinson2008 What proof do you have evolution happened? I'll wait. Adaptation and evolution are two very different things. Darwin proved finches adapted to their various food sources on isolated islands. They changed, but they STAYED finches. No one proved one animal can incrementally change into another kind of animal. Everything morphing into existence from a one celled creature form the ooze. That never happened. If it had we would have millions of fossils reflecting those incremental changes, and we don't have one. Not one. We have no cat/dogs, or horse/dogs or even an ape/man fossil---not one. There is no evidence Bob.
It's not an illusion. It's a fairy tale.
And you believe there was a boat with all the animals of the world on it?
@@markduell2468 Showing your ignorance of the Flood story is a weird flex. 😂
@@myfakeguuglaccount8307 I'm going with what the Bible says. Do you have a different source?
@@markduell2468 Doubling down on your ignorance is an even weirder flex.
@@myfakeguuglaccount8307
What does the flood story have to do with the science of evolution?
Anyone who believes in science is an evolutionist. So of the billions of evolutionist on Earth it would be very bizarre if none of them were dishonest.