For starters you cpu cache size is 30mb , compared to the 96mb the amd x3d gaming series offers. Also i bet you have 8-16 gigs of ram which is very low for tarkov, i have 16 myself and i stutter frequently. GPU doesnt matter for tarkov so the 4070 is gonna perform just as well as 2k or 3k series. Tarkov is cpu and ram mainly, and the 9800x3d, 7800x3d, 5800x3d are the best cpus for it, from best to worst. I bet if you get a 9800x3d, and a good set of fast 64g of ram, you will have way more than 200 fps.
Because he's in an offline game with no bots. The bots are the main cause of FPS loss, Tarkov is an extremely CPU heavy game and it's all thanks to the AI.
My bad I have 32GB DDR5 4800MHz RAM. But when i checked i seem to have bottleneck somewhere because usage on everything is like 50-70% (memory, gpu, cpu)
This is bad info and untrue. DLSS does not add latency and can actually reduce it (i.e., if it boosts your FPS). Frame gen is another story and can add some latency but (a) it's negligible with Reflex on and (b) can be offset by the FPS increase that comes with frame gen otherwise driving latency down.
@ I am a good fps player - I prefer DLSS on assuming it plays nicely with the given game and is DLSS 3 or, now, 4. I used to think - without any evidence - that it was going to be trash, but that's just not the reality. I don't think there are many pro games that actually benefit from DLSS, or even support it. The obvious exception is Warzone, where plenty of top players s do use it. There was a lot of justified negativity around it prior to the release of DLSS 3 as the image quality was decidedly worse with it on. I don't think people have moved on from that. The tests reputable sources have done make it plain that it has no impact on or improves latency.
Most pro gamers are IT illiterate- they are good at games. It can even reduce latency due to lower internal resolution. They dont use it because they need the most accurate and clear picture and the old CNN model introduced lots of blur in motion. DLAA “might”introduce a little bit more latency compared to other Anti AA solutions on older cards with lesser Tensor cores, that is correct. But so do some of the implemented sharpening filters in games.
The first TAA to DLSS 4... that fog though....
Lol WTF. Why does the fog disappear
unfortunately it happened to disappear at that time in raid. basically ruined the first clip
what I want to know is how tf do you have 200FPS. I have 4070 Ti (not super) and Intel Core i7-13700KF-5,40GHz and play at around 40-80 FPS
For starters you cpu cache size is 30mb , compared to the 96mb the amd x3d gaming series offers.
Also i bet you have 8-16 gigs of ram which is very low for tarkov, i have 16 myself and i stutter frequently.
GPU doesnt matter for tarkov so the 4070 is gonna perform just as well as 2k or 3k series.
Tarkov is cpu and ram mainly, and the 9800x3d, 7800x3d, 5800x3d are the best cpus for it, from best to worst. I bet if you get a 9800x3d, and a good set of fast 64g of ram, you will have way more than 200 fps.
yeah what he said. I normally get well over 200 fps and on maps like factory and labs its 300 plus. I run a 9800x3d with 64gb of ram with a 4090.
Because he's in an offline game with no bots. The bots are the main cause of FPS loss, Tarkov is an extremely CPU heavy game and it's all thanks to the AI.
My bad I have 32GB DDR5 4800MHz RAM. But when i checked i seem to have bottleneck somewhere because usage on everything is like 50-70% (memory, gpu, cpu)
Something in you settings are messed up, i have a 6700XT and 12400F and get better fps than you, these are budget parts.
how do you get the fps counter top right?
Press ; to open console and write "fps 1" and enter
GPU? CPU?
5800X3D/4070Ti Super
@@NoOne-pe6mg the hell i have the same cpu and a normal 4070 and have like double less fps than you
Because a tisuper is way more powerful. And a 16gb vram @apisalam4618
Its banable because its injecting into your game... i would wait until BSG gives this a go.
Its not. Official nvidia settings
goofball
@@zelloxy they even pinned a post in official tarkov discord about it.
its INJECTION... even if it comes from the nvidia driver
Just make sure to never use dlss for any fps game you take seriously, it creates way too much mouse input lag.
This is bad info and untrue. DLSS does not add latency and can actually reduce it (i.e., if it boosts your FPS). Frame gen is another story and can add some latency but (a) it's negligible with Reflex on and (b) can be offset by the FPS increase that comes with frame gen otherwise driving latency down.
@ Ask any good fps player and they will tell you the same thing, if 100% of pros say the same thing there is truth to it..
@ I am a good fps player - I prefer DLSS on assuming it plays nicely with the given game and is DLSS 3 or, now, 4. I used to think - without any evidence - that it was going to be trash, but that's just not the reality.
I don't think there are many pro games that actually benefit from DLSS, or even support it. The obvious exception is Warzone, where plenty of top players s do use it.
There was a lot of justified negativity around it prior to the release of DLSS 3 as the image quality was decidedly worse with it on. I don't think people have moved on from that.
The tests reputable sources have done make it plain that it has no impact on or improves latency.
Most pro gamers are IT illiterate- they are good at games. It can even reduce latency due to lower internal resolution. They dont use it because they need the most accurate and clear picture and the old CNN model introduced lots of blur in motion. DLAA “might”introduce a little bit more latency compared to other Anti AA solutions on older cards with lesser Tensor cores, that is correct. But so do some of the implemented sharpening filters in games.
Frame gen is obviously never to be used competitively. But thats not even a debate.
Are you noticing any performance increase with regard to micro stutters and enemy ai causing lag in raids?