Shocking error found in Prince Harry and Meghan's Lilibet christening statement

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 7 มี.ค. 2023
  • Prince Harry and Meghan have been slammed online as "religiously illiterate" after eagle-eyed social media users spotted a major blunder in the Sussexes' statement confirming their daughter Lilibet's christening.

ความคิดเห็น • 3.9K

  • @lisabunnie22960
    @lisabunnie22960 ปีที่แล้ว +224

    They're both diabolical and disturbing.

    • @carole4119
      @carole4119 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Yes we all have to be watchful of their antics
      Constantly

    • @alejandrosantos9190
      @alejandrosantos9190 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Both are DEVILS INCARNATE!

    • @nity2450
      @nity2450 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Mentally unstable both of them and obnoxious

  • @wendyorr3137
    @wendyorr3137 ปีที่แล้ว +858

    Lies lies and more lies from Harry and Megan 😡

    • @shirleyfisher8313
      @shirleyfisher8313 ปีที่แล้ว +30

      Oops...guess neither knew no Archbishop in Anglican church. And as titles not recognized is US is child's first name now Princess?

    • @zzzbbbooo
      @zzzbbbooo ปีที่แล้ว +2

      You know how it is - if their lips are moving, they're LYING! Same with any statements they make too whether directly or indirectly.

    • @buildmotosykletist1987
      @buildmotosykletist1987 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      Nah, they didn't lie. They invited the royals an hour before the christening.

    • @Essemm52
      @Essemm52 ปีที่แล้ว +28

      @@shirleyfisher8313 Not to mention that the use of the titles have not been sanctioned by the King!

    • @carole4119
      @carole4119 ปีที่แล้ว +24

      Events on kc calendar
      The Wales calendar every senior royal calendar is planned 6 months in advance!
      The monarchy cannot quickly change Events and meeting just for the demanding evil duo.
      They're disgusting

  • @ellietobe
    @ellietobe ปีที่แล้ว +70

    What is amazing to me is that they would even consider a “christening” since neither of them are Christians.

    • @vanessagray8604
      @vanessagray8604 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Yes, but without being christened the children cannot receive their titles

  • @kr8882
    @kr8882 ปีที่แล้ว +44

    They want the titles, the status and the money but don’t want to do anything for it.

    • @lynmedcraft-6001
      @lynmedcraft-6001 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      And if it’s true the mysterious kids are put in the line of succession they obviously don’t have to!!!
      Absolutely disgusting!!

  • @MarieAntoinetteandherlittlesis
    @MarieAntoinetteandherlittlesis ปีที่แล้ว +238

    They are not seriously calling their kids prince and princess. Of what?? Here in America we don’t have royalty, and they don’t work for the Monarchy in the UK anymore. I thought these two didn’t care about the titles or the lifestyle??

    • @tayler7441
      @tayler7441 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Those aren't titles, just names--the way some celebrities have named their children Prince or Princess.

    • @bb89670
      @bb89670 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Prince and princess of Montecito.

    • @thegalhorowitz
      @thegalhorowitz ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@tayler7441 they announced supposedly charles told them its in the british news… They want spoiled tax payer money kids😂

    • @xziztortheeternal6471
      @xziztortheeternal6471 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Of perpetual liars

    • @MandySam13
      @MandySam13 ปีที่แล้ว

      They are massive liars. These two frauds only care about making money merching the titles.

  • @StolenW
    @StolenW ปีที่แล้ว +408

    Desperate times call for desperate measures. They know they are nothing without the institution they absolutely hate.

    • @patrajasingam6694
      @patrajasingam6694 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Hilarious prince cheating onhiwife witha mistress is a prince is disgraceful

    • @sunflower-oo1ff
      @sunflower-oo1ff ปีที่แล้ว +24

      Meghan is also nothing without Harry….people only want the real thing..Harry is..was the real thing…now she had made him into her puppet…;(

    • @priesteresmarietje4772
      @priesteresmarietje4772 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Absolutely well said.

    • @ABC1701A
      @ABC1701A ปีที่แล้ว +11

      @@sunflower-oo1ff And IF she divorces him he will remain the ''real deal'' while she will drop back into the nothingness she sprang from. She might even have to get a job to earn some money [the horror :)]

    • @DebbiSmithDC
      @DebbiSmithDC ปีที่แล้ว +12

      @@ABC1701A That’s why she made sure the kids have those titles! Merching them.

  • @SK-su3pt
    @SK-su3pt ปีที่แล้ว +30

    The legitimacy of the children is not established allegedly no public records or receipts!

    • @SK-su3pt
      @SK-su3pt ปีที่แล้ว +2

      The public do not believe the children are legitimate! Surrogacy, adoption! Fake pregnancies allegedly!

    • @heddaszczepanski9210
      @heddaszczepanski9210 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Exactly!!!

  • @miro9440
    @miro9440 ปีที่แล้ว +49

    I don’t see how this child can have a princess title when she is not yet proven to be ‘of the body’. Besides which, this is an elected title.

  • @irenecosta4909
    @irenecosta4909 ปีที่แล้ว +1589

    How can you be a prince or a princess if your not a part of the royal family ??

    • @laurieparker-stuart868
      @laurieparker-stuart868 ปีที่แล้ว +96

      Once has a dog named Duke. Lovely pet, but no, he wasn't affiliated with the Royals.

    • @sallycent6598
      @sallycent6598 ปีที่แล้ว +219

      You have to understand this woman has married him for his title and her children to have status as well, and anyone believes that this woman married him for love is naive.

    • @Pamela-pg8hj
      @Pamela-pg8hj ปีที่แล้ว +144

      Prince Harry and his wife live in the United States and we do not have a Royal family. Their daughter was born here, so if they want titles go home!

    • @briansullivan5908
      @briansullivan5908 ปีที่แล้ว +55

      And a US citizen

    • @michaelofsydney6128
      @michaelofsydney6128 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      *you're

  • @ummagudas515
    @ummagudas515 ปีที่แล้ว +2219

    For someone who claims titles don't mean anything to her, Meghan sure jumped on this one.

    • @pollyanna1112
      @pollyanna1112 ปีที่แล้ว +72

      Exactly. I was of the belief that the titles Prince Princess had not been given at all

    • @geraldinekearney542
      @geraldinekearney542 ปีที่แล้ว +55

      @@pollyanna1112 that was my belief as well, and the Royal website still has the children as Master and Miss

    • @deejames1st
      @deejames1st ปีที่แล้ว +120

      IMO It made them feel more important and equal to William to Catharine to say arch bishop - since it was an actual arch bishop who christened William and Catherine’s children.
      They also made this announcement the same day Catherine had a public engagement. Their jealousy of William and Catherine is HUGE.

    • @glynishashimura9440
      @glynishashimura9440 ปีที่แล้ว

      She's an pure fake, liar

    • @melbaderringerboney6027
      @melbaderringerboney6027 ปีที่แล้ว

      HARRY AND MEGAN ARE STARTING UP AGAIN,THEY ARE BOTH NARCISSISTIC, EVIL,NOT GOOD PEOPLE.

  • @stephmiller3860
    @stephmiller3860 ปีที่แล้ว +439

    I give this about as much credence as the ‘we were married in a private garden ceremony three days before the spectacle wedding at St. George’s’ story.😂😂😂

    • @shirleyfisher8313
      @shirleyfisher8313 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      That's one archbishop down...now two..oh Megs can't keep stories straight!!!! And I believe Charles was going to bestow titles after his coronation...William was needed to fill the Wales connection immediately!!!

    • @suzanablank5809
      @suzanablank5809 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Spot on!!!

    • @halfdome4158
      @halfdome4158 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Me too.

    • @joycegibbs5267
      @joycegibbs5267 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      that's a good point. I've heard the bloke who christened her wasn't the one they thought and the one that did, used to work for Richard Nixon, that celebrated Democrat President. Absolutely hilarious.

    • @dianneking3842
      @dianneking3842 ปีที่แล้ว

      No bother gives a rat’s @$$ what you give or think.

  • @melanysmith3023
    @melanysmith3023 ปีที่แล้ว +75

    The way these two treat family scares me . I can't imagine what kind of parents they will be when family means nothing to them

    • @elaineleoszewski9362
      @elaineleoszewski9362 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      And it doesn't matter on the age of the family member.

    • @josalynlawson2423
      @josalynlawson2423 ปีที่แล้ว

      I cut off my toxic sister so I can understand. Family or not doesn't matter. Anytime a relationship is one sided something needs to change. Sometimes that means ghosting them. I both Harry and Meghan's family are extremely selfish and do not love Harry or Meghan. King chuck or whatever his name is didn't love Harry and Meghans half sister and dad are just clout chasers.

    • @connie9302
      @connie9302 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      If these kids of theirs bring in the m.o.n.e.y. they will mean ALOT………….😅

    • @annemccarron2281
      @annemccarron2281 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      It's already quite obvious they will be and are now terrible parents. My mother was a narcissist and she was a terrible mother until the day she died.

    • @Agnar669
      @Agnar669 ปีที่แล้ว

      It is said when they were in on their trip overseas as working royals...they didn't sleep in the same room, and neither of them took an interest in Archie, only brought him out to be cuddled when they were being photographed. But they are both evil, and the kids are better off with hired help...not that druggie, drug selling, fraud, of a grandmother.

  • @adellajones9887
    @adellajones9887 ปีที่แล้ว +2219

    Ok. If there is a Lili, she was born in the US. If there is a Lili, she is a resident of the US. If there is a Lili, she allegedly has been christened in a private home in the US. In the US....we don't have princesses or royalty.

    • @libbykajet5375
      @libbykajet5375 ปีที่แล้ว +198

      Isn't it important to be Christian to get your kids Christened?

    • @gracevalentine685
      @gracevalentine685 ปีที่แล้ว +312

      JULY 4TH, 1776, USA do not have Royals! America Little Girl is not a "Princess" she is too young to work at Disneyland!!

    • @bestofsmall
      @bestofsmall ปีที่แล้ว +272

      If there is a lily she would also have a birth certificate none can be found even Archie's anouncement wasn't signed as it was supposed to be ...needs to be investigated imo

    • @goatielocks404
      @goatielocks404 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      @@libbykajet5375 nope

    • @michiyodoll9916
      @michiyodoll9916 ปีที่แล้ว +108

      wrong! we have princes and princesses in the USA. DISNEY Land makes wishes come true. princess of montecito.

  • @susanlane8803
    @susanlane8803 ปีที่แล้ว +233

    Considering they wanted nothing to do with Royal titles when they dumped the family, this just makes them more hypocritical than ever!

  • @domainmailbox3850
    @domainmailbox3850 ปีที่แล้ว +73

    Their lack of self-awareness is truly astonishing.

  • @Kristameadowsmusic
    @Kristameadowsmusic ปีที่แล้ว +95

    I thought they said they felt sorry for children growing up in the Royal family and didn't want the same for their children...?

    • @valsyaranamual6853
      @valsyaranamual6853 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      So they' re locked up in Montecito! CPS should be called to check on these "children"!

    • @carmenbyrne6521
      @carmenbyrne6521 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Hypocrites! The nicest thing you can say about them.

    • @elizabethsheffield6609
      @elizabethsheffield6609 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      .......but want KC3 to continue to pay them financial support.

    • @jennifersxhweitzer7401
      @jennifersxhweitzer7401 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      But they were not there children. they didnt belong to everyone. no blood shared. If they were honest they would be accepted by all. She drops a clanger all the way round. Those poor kids could end up freaks.

  • @realityadvised2543
    @realityadvised2543 ปีที่แล้ว +300

    No one came, including Princess Lillibet 👻

    • @CorgiLove81
      @CorgiLove81 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      No because the doll was snuggled in her box on the closet shelf😂😂

    • @jg5755
      @jg5755 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      🤣🤣🤣

    • @margueritethurston3913
      @margueritethurston3913 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      🤣🤣🤣🤣

    • @NH-tb2sm
      @NH-tb2sm ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Out of curiosity, why do people say that Cruella and her puppet don't have any children?

    • @abuelitachichi2012
      @abuelitachichi2012 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Cruella had a hysterectomy many years ago and she had the nerve to be wearing a moonbump and holding it all the time afraid she was going to loose it

  • @sallybrady1074
    @sallybrady1074 ปีที่แล้ว +803

    They can’t get anything right! Scooby has made lots of misstatements lately! Neil Sean says invites to RF were given in late January but their schedules are booked up 6 months in advance. Harkles knew they couldn’t come but wanted to show father and brother in a bad light….the usual deceitful manipulating. Sigh.

    • @patsimpson7834
      @patsimpson7834 ปีที่แล้ว +84

      Just like Lili's birthday party at Frogmore during the Jubilee.

    • @katjo71367
      @katjo71367 ปีที่แล้ว

      #MM is the #Narcissist in this setting and quite likely so is #Harry

    • @lizwhittleston5963
      @lizwhittleston5963 ปีที่แล้ว +48

      Typical of narcles knew royals couldn't be there but it's great for their victim narrative.

    • @kookaburralaughs1869
      @kookaburralaughs1869 ปีที่แล้ว +46

      Yeah Scoobies comments are as fake as his face.

    • @michellesayers5346
      @michellesayers5346 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      I wouldn't listen to Neil too much he just re hashes old news

  • @CobwebCottage
    @CobwebCottage ปีที่แล้ว +9

    SHE thinks that by having a Prince as a son, and a Princess as a daughter, will bestow great kudos upon her. She's going to milk those titles and those children for the rest of their childhood lives. Just wait until those kids grow up... she's going to find herself lost and alone, with grown up children who are going to spill the beans on their home lives!
    We all just need to play the long game. What goes around, comes around.

  • @worldgonemad1977
    @worldgonemad1977 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    The children are Prince and Princess but not HRH’s. That needs to be conferred by The King.
    By the way, that photograph of Harry’s aunts - Diana’s sisters - purported to be attending the baby’s christening, has a British Bobby in the background. It was taken at the unveiling of Diana, Princess of Wales memorial statue

  • @mariankhamo1566
    @mariankhamo1566 ปีที่แล้ว +251

    I thought Harry and Meghan said titles didn't matter and they wanted to live private lives. But as for not even knowing who Baptised their child, one couldn't make it up.

    • @bonniecastle9443
      @bonniecastle9443 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Do they attend Mass regularly? Their parish priest could have christened/baptized Lilibet.

    • @carolmolten
      @carolmolten ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@bonniecastle9443 But, wait - they are not Catholic.

    • @traci4161
      @traci4161 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      It can't be christened if you don't get the name of the person doing it in the correct church! Tyler Perry needs to cut his loss or he will start losing popularity. I myself do not feel as strong toward him since his alliance with such malicious people

    • @libbybethuk
      @libbybethuk ปีที่แล้ว +3

      ​@Bonnie Castle in the uk christenings are not done during lent. Is it different rules in America for lent

    • @veronicacrabtreehill6608
      @veronicacrabtreehill6608 ปีที่แล้ว

      What child ??

  • @peekaboopixie
    @peekaboopixie ปีที่แล้ว +582

    Why would Lilibet, a little girl no one has ever seen, need a Princess title in the US? Every picture put out of her looks identical to other people's children. The same is true for Archie. What are the odds?

    • @bb89670
      @bb89670 ปีที่แล้ว +41

      Different kids with different hair color, borrowed from friends, taken from a catalog.

    • @thulomanchay
      @thulomanchay ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Lilibet was Queen Elizabeth II childhood nickname.
      Princess would be Lilibet Diana Mountbatten-Windsor nickname.

    • @dianecameron137
      @dianecameron137 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      money

    • @annevan8836
      @annevan8836 ปีที่แล้ว

      Both kids are fake, no children.

    • @ltj18taylor73
      @ltj18taylor73 ปีที่แล้ว +40

      The "Christening" pic they used is the same one they used for her 1st Birthday. Surely they would use an updated image of Lilibet? to even TRY to make this charade look real.

  • @joseeallyn9950
    @joseeallyn9950 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Perhaps the Palace can show us pictures of these children, the father's DNA test results and the names and DNA test results of the children's birth mothers? This is not only important for the British Royal Family but also for the Getty family.

  • @tikthat6821
    @tikthat6821 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Why use the title princess if they don't want a royal life as they have so many times claimed?

  • @Eis4Electric
    @Eis4Electric ปีที่แล้ว +632

    I didn't think Harry could father any children with a frostbitten todger.

    • @elizabethlacky6068
      @elizabethlacky6068 ปีที่แล้ว +48

      Omg 🤣🤣🤣

    • @briansullivan5908
      @briansullivan5908 ปีที่แล้ว +51

      He put the cream on😂

    • @zigzag6758
      @zigzag6758 ปีที่แล้ว +45

      ​@@briansullivan5908 and it reminded him of his mother.

    • @MM-ty6cu
      @MM-ty6cu ปีที่แล้ว +20

      Y’all are wildin’ out here!! 😂

    • @erikahentschke5208
      @erikahentschke5208 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      Ugh... not with someone else's hand

  • @weepingwillow1111
    @weepingwillow1111 ปีที่แล้ว +326

    THEY SHOULD NOT HAVE TITLES. None of them!

    • @meilingflesa8140
      @meilingflesa8140 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      I am eagerly awaiting the divorce and am just wondering if Methane will insist on keeping her title after her and the kids dump Horrid.

    • @Anurania
      @Anurania ปีที่แล้ว +11

      @@meilingflesa8140 I don't think divorce would look good for her brand. I think her plan is to become a widow with all the sympathy and money that comes with that status.

    • @judithscobee8102
      @judithscobee8102 ปีที่แล้ว

      Children are borrowed from friends, she’s infertile (hysterectomy), they have no biological children!!!

    • @jg5755
      @jg5755 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@Anurania That's my fear as well. She gains far more as a poor, distraught widow than a divorcee.

    • @jav9069
      @jav9069 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@jg5755 really, I would think MI6 would have her Diana'd at that point! They're just waiting for the right moment!

  • @nity2450
    @nity2450 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Never in my days could I have imagined the RF would have been brought to these low levels ...by a mover

    • @Threadbow
      @Threadbow หลายเดือนก่อน

      They were not, they did not attend.

  • @sharonwells9593
    @sharonwells9593 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    Can someone in California check for the recorded christening in that church? There's no Lillibet legally named in state's registry.

  • @QPRTokyo
    @QPRTokyo ปีที่แล้ว +1039

    As everyone knows the royal family needs at least six months advance notice to attend an event.

  • @meilingflesa8140
    @meilingflesa8140 ปีที่แล้ว +335

    Why am l not surprised Horrid and Methane are trying to talk themselves up through lying or distorting the truth again.

    • @vanessahe9336
      @vanessahe9336 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The Royal website is about to be updated. It's official.

    • @lindaross4331
      @lindaross4331 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      @@vanessahe9336 I'll believe that when it happens.

    • @kathyfrancis9229
      @kathyfrancis9229 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thise two are a distortion of the truth. Lol. They are goddamned crazy. Completely cracked. Ohh im sorry. It's all of us not them. They make me sick. To use their own child to score points. I hope their children will survive.

    • @shiitake1521
      @shiitake1521 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Their poor children. Can only imagine how effed up they’ll be with those habitual liars as parents. Daddy a druggie to boot!

    • @RosemarySmith1
      @RosemarySmith1 ปีที่แล้ว

      Look, the media and the royals are all leaking stuff about Meghan and Harry, why shouldn't they have their say?

  • @kimberlysoto6864
    @kimberlysoto6864 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    “We want privacy”. Now get these children titles so they can live a nice private life as well. And it goes on and on.

  • @deadcatbounce3124
    @deadcatbounce3124 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    Is it just me, or does anyone else get a chuckle out of the thought of someone trying to fill out a form, where the only title options are Mr/Mrs./Miss/Ms/Dr and then makes a scene that Prince/Princess isn't an option and they demand to be recognized as Prince/Princess?

  • @Couilles_Profondes
    @Couilles_Profondes ปีที่แล้ว +76

    We Want Privacy!
    We Want Privacy!
    World Wide Privacy Tour!

  • @lisawheatley7179
    @lisawheatley7179 ปีที่แล้ว +831

    Wouldn’t she need to be christened in the Church of England to receive such titles, and NOT the church of Los Angeles? Wouldn’t there need to be a royal representative?
    This has stank all over it-“People Magazine confirmed”- how much did Meg pay for that article?

    • @sp-pz8uc
      @sp-pz8uc ปีที่แล้ว +109

      Their living in cloud cuckoo land, mixed with drugs.

    • @seshcg4764
      @seshcg4764 ปีที่แล้ว +43

      They are Los Angeles Prince and princess

    • @Baerchenization
      @Baerchenization ปีที่แล้ว +16

      Did you not listen, they get the titles by law, not from the church.

    • @jav9069
      @jav9069 ปีที่แล้ว

      The episcopal church of America is in Communion with the church of England! You should educate yourself self, I can understand not liking her Instagram loving b itch mom but taking it out on the children OMG! You should be ashamed of yourself!

    • @colleenthompson9502
      @colleenthompson9502 ปีที่แล้ว

      I can't believe they're still trying to be royalty any old way they can. These two are a couple of nut jobs!!!!

  • @catherinehanson
    @catherinehanson ปีที่แล้ว +12

    Actually feel sorry for their children. Parent insist on a title in another country where their parents are despised for hurting the Queen, her husband and their family knowing they are obliged not to respond. They are beyond contempt.

  • @marybannon1959
    @marybannon1959 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I remember them saying that they did not want titles for their children, need fro privacy

  • @mommas1276
    @mommas1276 ปีที่แล้ว +40

    They are going to use whatever titles make them feel more important….because they are narcissists.

    • @clareroberts4980
      @clareroberts4980 ปีที่แล้ว

      Money 💰 and that yacht woman/ prossy has all the celebrity she ever craved

  • @majoyap3403
    @majoyap3403 ปีที่แล้ว +67

    Archie and Lilibet were not bestowed of the title by KC3, so they should not be using titles at all. More importantly, Lilibet is US citizen, not British. So why will she be bestowed of that title?
    H&M are spewing lies after lies. 🤣

    • @novamarie2162
      @novamarie2162 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      I am in no way debating what you say, but wouldn't she have dual citizenship with her dad being British? I still don't think they need titles, but I do wonder about the citizenship situation.

    • @abuelitachichi2012
      @abuelitachichi2012 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      NO CHILDREN SHE HAD A HYSTERECTOMY

    • @BogusBambini
      @BogusBambini ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@novamarie2162 an American citizen could marry a person of nobility, and have a child who was both a citizen due to one parent, and also a titled noble from the other parent.

    • @frumpusnumpus
      @frumpusnumpus ปีที่แล้ว +3

      ​@@novamarie2162 not necessarily. Depends on the immigration laws for that country. Having a parent from that country does not immediately confer citizenship for the kids. Although, since Harry is royalty, it might be different for the kids. Also, the prince and princess titles are not automatically given to grandkids. The king or queen has to be the one to give those titles to the children. As far as I know, when the queen was alive, she refused to give Meghan's kids any titles, and King Charles hasn't given them titles either.

    • @33BiBix77
      @33BiBix77 ปีที่แล้ว

      Both H n MM are habitual liars for sure

  • @andysuber941
    @andysuber941 ปีที่แล้ว +29

    At 2:19 it says Lilibet was baptised in the "Episcopalian" church which is an incorrect use of the word Episcopalian. The church is the "Episcopal" church and the members are "Episcopalian". So if an article is going to be all about the incorrect title of a person (the Bishop, in this case) please be sure the correct titles of the church and it's members are used. Also, the Episcopal church and the Anglican church are vastly different, even if they are grouped together in name. Now, before I get labeled as a supporter of Megan and Harry, please understand that I just can't stand either.

    • @carolmolten
      @carolmolten ปีที่แล้ว

      Remember that the Presiding Bishop of the Episcopal Church in the US officiated at their wedding.

    • @buelahland
      @buelahland ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Right on. And Chas is the head of the Church of England which is Anglican. Episcopal church has diverged from the original blueprint so as to be almost unrecognizable today. A mockery. No wonder as these two r massive mockers. Mocking God like this and the monarchy is so distasteful. They really r inviting hellfire.

    • @Susan-ml6wl
      @Susan-ml6wl ปีที่แล้ว +1

      ​@@carolmolten he gave the speach of love and slavery.
      The most diabolical
      Speach I've ever heard. It was like a theater stage production.
      Who ever brought him over.?
      He ruined the marriage of a Royal Prince of England 🇬🇧.

  • @marleneeisnor9719
    @marleneeisnor9719 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Everything that can go wrong will go wrong for them. You reap what you sow

  • @leeevans2929
    @leeevans2929 ปีที่แล้ว +211

    Where’s the proof that supposed kid was born of the body. So far no doctor has signed off on delivering that kid

    • @vanessahe9336
      @vanessahe9336 ปีที่แล้ว

      Where is the proof that they wasn't born from her body? If you haters have proof, that Meghan didn't give birth to her and Prince Harrys children, please feel free to present your proof. Hehehehehe 🤭

    • @Lioness_UTV
      @Lioness_UTV ปีที่แล้ว +1

      According to?

    • @leeevans2929
      @leeevans2929 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@vanessahe9336 no Vanessa, YOU PROVE THEY WERE. There is no EVIDENCE from any doctor who delivered the kids, no hospital records for either kid being born

    • @vanessahe9336
      @vanessahe9336 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@leeevans2929 Stop listening to these online troll sites. The British media hates Meghan, if this was true, they would gladly tell the world. Meghan gave birth to her own children, until there is proof that she didn't, you haters don't have a leg to stand on.

    • @lindaross4331
      @lindaross4331 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Lioness_UTV According to the notice board placed outside announcing Archie's birth. Witnesses are required. Even the doctor they named said she was out of the country at the time.

  • @ashwinireddy4297
    @ashwinireddy4297 ปีที่แล้ว +126

    Didn't they say they didn't care for titles for their children ?

    • @coling3957
      @coling3957 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      nothing they say is truthful.

    • @bevramsay909
      @bevramsay909 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@coling3957 probably the same as you then !

    • @aleksandraposmetnaya3108
      @aleksandraposmetnaya3108 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Whey did Quote “ we want normal life for our that time 1 kid “ But you know world privacy tour 😂

    • @bevramsay909
      @bevramsay909 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@aleksandraposmetnaya3108 whey is a by product of cheese or butter making!!!! What's that got to do with anything?????

    • @trueblue6039
      @trueblue6039 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      But the more obvious thing, they don't have any children because MM hates kids, she throws them to the wind for anyone to catch and raise.

  • @eiraalvarado6006
    @eiraalvarado6006 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    King Charles, are you sure "Harry's children" are your grandchildren?

  • @phyllisanngodfrey6137
    @phyllisanngodfrey6137 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    In the United States a Baptismal Certificate is only used as a form of ID for certain things when there is no OFFICIAL birth certificate on record with the health department. It certainly does NOT confer a title on someone nor can it be used as ID except in limited circumstances. My cousin’s child was born in a remote village in the Philippines. She was born at home by a family member…….no birth certificate……Since the Philippines is predominately Roman Catholic, the embassy in Manila accepted her Baptismal certificate endorsed by a missionary Catholic priest to get her a passport to come to the USA with her father. People here are discouraged from using names that are titles on their birth certificates. We use names like Prince, Princess, Duke, Duchess, etc FOR OUR DOGS😉

  • @vagabondjane3547
    @vagabondjane3547 ปีที่แล้ว +464

    Harry can’t notify the King that his children are going to “use” the titles! The titles are bestowed by the King!

    • @Champagneforever
      @Champagneforever ปีที่แล้ว +47

      That was my thought!
      I will wait for a notice from Buckingham Palace..
      Gosh I hope that it the King is not complicit in this debacle.
      His people will not tolerate it!!

    • @vanessahe9336
      @vanessahe9336 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      The Royal web site is about to be updated. It's official.

    • @Agnar669
      @Agnar669 ปีที่แล้ว +44

      Titles are up to the king's DISCRETION...not the order of Mattress Meg for the two frauds.

    • @Maggie22002
      @Maggie22002 ปีที่แล้ว +33

      @@Champagneforever It will also be Interesting to see what Lady Colin Campbell says about this in her future videos.

    • @vanessahe9336
      @vanessahe9336 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@Agnar669 Tell that to the updated Royal website. You haters are about to be devastated. Hehehehehe 🤭

  • @stephaniec0625
    @stephaniec0625 ปีที่แล้ว +137

    If the Harkles can promote their daughter to princess, then surely they can promote Rev Taylor to Archbishop. He should be congratulated.

  • @marysneed7119
    @marysneed7119 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    The family was invited, but keeping mind that the king is a head of state, and the rest have royal engagements daily it's not like they would just pop in for a few hours. It sounds like H & M just put out the fact the family didn't come to be spiteful. It fits their thinking that the family would stop in the middle of the Queens jubilee to attend Lily's birthday party too.

  • @run4cmt
    @run4cmt ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Baptisms also do NOT take place at home in the Episcopal or Catholic churches. I have had nieces and nephews baptized in private ceremonies AT church.

  • @dellyboot2703
    @dellyboot2703 ปีที่แล้ว +860

    As a 61 yr old Brit I felt for Harry post Diana and had a soft spot for him. It's gone

    • @lesjohn534
      @lesjohn534 ปีที่แล้ว +48

      I feel the same.

    • @margueritethurston3913
      @margueritethurston3913 ปีที่แล้ว +48

      Agreed👍🏼

    • @NH-tb2sm
      @NH-tb2sm ปีที่แล้ว +60

      I think most people feel the same way.

    • @dannaharbor8054
      @dannaharbor8054 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      As an American🇺🇸 I don't like neither one of them there BIG LIARS 👨🏻‍🦰🙎🏽‍♀️ and most of us Americans 🇺🇸didn't like them!!!!

    • @janieleishman9130
      @janieleishman9130 ปีที่แล้ว +37

      As a 60 year old woman in America loved Harry also but not anymore !!!

  • @karenmegert5872
    @karenmegert5872 ปีที่แล้ว +69

    These two can't get anything right. Someone is going to end up with charges as this is another f up with church elders. I am praying king Charles doesn't title these kids

    • @meilingflesa8140
      @meilingflesa8140 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      I am praying King Charles grows a pair of balls and stands up to them. If l was Harry l would pray that Charles doesn't die soon because it will be a whole new can of worms when William becomes King 👑.

    • @43ANGELAB
      @43ANGELAB ปีที่แล้ว +7

      @@meilingflesa8140 Hell Yeah ! All Hail King William

    • @judithscobee8102
      @judithscobee8102 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      What kids? They don’t have any just borrowed child actors from friends as props!

  • @bd5860
    @bd5860 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Wait, they obviously hate the institution and left it by free will….NOW they realize it was their only source of fame or money cuz neither have any skills. And Uncle Edward still works yet refused the title for his kids while these 2 DONT work yet want the titles and the proximity to the life they left! Despicable!

  • @lynnewilson2975
    @lynnewilson2975 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Wouldn’t they need permission to announce this ?

  • @deedeesmith3073
    @deedeesmith3073 ปีที่แล้ว +65

    What hypocrites! They don’t want to work or associate with the royal family but think we are going to respect the title here in the United States. We settled that score well over 200 years ago thank you very much.

    • @patryan1375
      @patryan1375 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Deedee Smith. You really are the butt of jokes over these invisible children. You go on and on about "we won the war" when it was the French army who were paid mercenaries in your War. The loudest voices about the AMERICAN Princess (Methane markle) are the Americans. They have been harping on about the invisible Prince and Princess, and all because methane wants to merchandise the children - she registered their names on a website to sell goods before they were born. How can she have a baby when she had a hysterectomy about 15 years ago? What happened to the award for only having two children? Is it another plastic doll or a miscarriage over the weekend of the coronation? They criticised William and Catherine for having three children. She is eaten up with envy for William and Catherine, but you can keep the two druggies. She was handing out drugs in the guests' goody bags at her wedding to Trevor (#2). He said recently that she is barren. She is a lying piece of garbage. I saw her moonbump fall around her knees with her supposed Archie pregnancy. I saw her walking with the bump swinging from left to right and creased across the middle when she bent over. She is s charlatan. Over to the markles family for the truth. If they come here, they will have a nasty shock. 😱

    • @jocelynecomeau6572
      @jocelynecomeau6572 ปีที่แล้ว

      I would show them the middle finger

    • @deedeesmith3073
      @deedeesmith3073 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@patryan1375 I really can’t understand your comment it’s all over the place.

    • @deedeesmith3073
      @deedeesmith3073 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      You don’t know history of the United States ? We fought for freedom from the monarchy and don’t respect royal titles . Where were you educated or perhaps your not American

  • @kellyowen49
    @kellyowen49 ปีที่แล้ว +43

    This is about the 15th time they have announced this kid getting christened

    • @ireneprassas1278
      @ireneprassas1278 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      And she’s for a long time 1 year old 😅…she must be close to 2 by now !🎉

  • @housheefukahh
    @housheefukahh หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    They’re so crazy that they abdicate but still demand for the titles!! What gives??

  • @kathleencarter7231
    @kathleencarter7231 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    ALL SHOW AND NO GO! The "Princess" title is almost a condescending term in the USA! H&M can't stop trying to get back at the RF! They refuse to let go of the RF traditions and titles, but claim they want a life apart from the UK? So it must be all for the money!!

  • @cyankirkpatrick5194
    @cyankirkpatrick5194 ปีที่แล้ว +409

    My late brother in law use to say you can't lie to lair you can't christen an American citizen into royality

    • @sidecarmisanthrope5927
      @sidecarmisanthrope5927 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      Christening is not a legal process. You can christen your kids as anything you want.

    • @premillawilly6134
      @premillawilly6134 ปีที่แล้ว +24

      As an American citizen you cannot hold titles. YES

    • @edennis8578
      @edennis8578 ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@@premillawilly6134 American citizens can hold titles, they just can't hold a political office. Look it up.

    • @jav9069
      @jav9069 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@premillawilly6134 you ignorant, people serving in Congress and US government can't hold titles of nobility, omg read the freaking US constitution again! 🤦

    • @argustuft2394
      @argustuft2394 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Did he also tell you that you were semi-literate?

  • @sandiswitzer201
    @sandiswitzer201 ปีที่แล้ว +137

    Why do they want there children to have titles. I thought Megan didn’t care about titles.

    • @judithscobee8102
      @judithscobee8102 ปีที่แล้ว

      They’ll get their security then!

    • @elizabethhannah4704
      @elizabethhannah4704 ปีที่แล้ว

      H and M are Ex-royals by choice. Narc manipulation and ploys are falling thick and fast....GOOD.

    • @Kiss_lynda
      @Kiss_lynda ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@judithscobee8102 😂 yeah but they don’t. Try again.

    • @catwoman7462
      @catwoman7462 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Oh she cares, very very much. That's why she insists on the use of her own courtesy title.

    • @combatduckie
      @combatduckie ปีที่แล้ว +3

      narcissists do EXTREMELY care about titles etc

  • @johnmooney9444
    @johnmooney9444 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The US constitution specifically states that US citizens may not bear a royal title or a title of nobility.

  • @gilliansmith9134
    @gilliansmith9134 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    If someone out there lives in LA , please could they check with the Bishop concerned. Maybe they fixed him up as they did with the Archbishop of Canterbury.

    • @carolmolten
      @carolmolten ปีที่แล้ว

      Check with The Episcopal News . . .

  • @arlenebasten9624
    @arlenebasten9624 ปีที่แล้ว +55

    Can't attend a christening for a kid that doesn't exist.

  • @cataniamommaitalia87
    @cataniamommaitalia87 ปีที่แล้ว +76

    They probably LIED about that too

  • @annmerley52
    @annmerley52 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I am an Episcopalian in the US. These are the rules: "A christening must always take place in a church, so it's usually not possible to have a christening at home, in a function room or outdoors". I believe exceptions will be made in the case of highly unusual cases. This did not happen, in my opinion.

  • @paulsycam7233
    @paulsycam7233 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    She said “put it in here, Harry” the rest is history.

  • @BogusBambini
    @BogusBambini ปีที่แล้ว +138

    Does 'in due course' mean 'as soon as we verify the moonbump allegations?' Only offspring 'of the body' can be granted titles.....

    • @macca777
      @macca777 ปีที่แล้ว +26

      yes and how do you do that after a hysterectomy?? Her Dad says she's had one. Allegedly 😛

    • @abuelitachichi2012
      @abuelitachichi2012 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      The children were rented, they keep lying and people believe the scam

  • @karinkatona3444
    @karinkatona3444 ปีที่แล้ว +75

    Of course it’s important for 2 American kids to wear fancy titles and be the laughing stock for the other kids at school. Well done Sophie and Edward to protect your kids from this

    • @elainagilbert7663
      @elainagilbert7663 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Why would they be laughingstocks? Other than because of how embarrassing their parents are. I would've loved to have a title when I was in school and I would've thought it was the coolest thing in the world to know someone who did. Especially in America where nobody is considered special for anything. The decision by Edward and Sophie makes even less sense because they're still working royals and their children are English.

    • @barbaracreel2777
      @barbaracreel2777 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@elainagilbert7663 Because 1) they do NOT have kids 2) Titles are not recognized in North America. DUH , DO YOU GET IT NOW OR DO I NEED TO TYPE SLOWER?

    • @elainagilbert7663
      @elainagilbert7663 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@barbaracreel2777 They have two children. No proof to say otherwise. And titles aren't given to North Americans, however, if someone has a title we use it because it's the respectful thing to do. Also, the speed at which you type is only recognizable on your end as the text comes out the same regardless.

    • @dianareintges4117
      @dianareintges4117 ปีที่แล้ว

      again who cares?

    • @elainagilbert7663
      @elainagilbert7663 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@dianareintges4117 You must do to an extent since you watched and commented.

  • @lornarettig3215
    @lornarettig3215 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I’ve rarely witnessed such craven selfishness in supposedly grown adults.

  • @deechapman4474
    @deechapman4474 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Can't even keep their lies straight

  • @helenaasousa
    @helenaasousa ปีที่แล้ว +20

    You’re not a Princess or Prince. Nor are you Catholic or Episcopalian. Big Challenge Finding Your Place in this Big World, éh Marry & Heghan⁉️

  • @justaname8313
    @justaname8313 ปีที่แล้ว +209

    Buckingham Palace should release a Public Statement announcing that any Royal Titles can only be announced via the Royal Household. Those that have made this publication have done so without any advise or written Authority from the Monarchy.

    • @luciesmom3111
      @luciesmom3111 ปีที่แล้ว

      This whole nonsense was an in-your-face campaign done by the dirty yachting dutchess to press the palaces buttons, almost daring the King to do anything about it. Boy, do they have King Charles's numbers? He'll do nothing about this like he's let their other craziness go on as long as it has.

    • @Mojogoblue
      @Mojogoblue ปีที่แล้ว +4

      It’s in the Letters Patent. They are the grandchildren of the sovereign, therefore with King Charles’ ascension, the titles are their birthright.

    • @justaname8313
      @justaname8313 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      @@Mojogoblue No dispute given the "current" patent. I do think out of respect for the British Monarch this announcement was not her place to state publicly. She should have waited for the official announcement. She is panicking they know the Titles are going imo.

    • @sunflower-oo1ff
      @sunflower-oo1ff ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Yes, that would be brilliant 👏

    • @corriesweet2010
      @corriesweet2010 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      @@Mojogoblue The letters patent of 1917, when it was assumed those titled would hold an active position in the Royal household, not born in a country which fought to break away from the country which the title is held. Harry is not a senior Royal, the situation since 1917 has changed dramatically.

  • @renesavoie6698
    @renesavoie6698 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    They say KC was aware the Harkles would be using Prince and Princess . They probably sent an email the same way the informed the Queen of the name Lilibet. Not asked or discussed. They just did it

  • @priesteresmarietje4772
    @priesteresmarietje4772 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Do they practice or attend services in the U.S.? Or do they just order up a bishop when they want a ceremony?

  • @nl2766
    @nl2766 ปีที่แล้ว +186

    Absurd to think that any family overseas, particularly royalty, with packed calendars, security concerns, plus family that has been maligned and trashed for money would just hop on a plane and attend.

    • @suzanablank5809
      @suzanablank5809 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      I suspect its fake news. MM made sure its believed its done so the girl is not requested to be christened in Uk i.e. so that is not used to force her to bring kids to Uk if she chooses not to come. Plus to show middle finger to RF how she can do what she likes and deprive them of being part of it. This MM is mad for sure, imo.

    • @sandrafinbar
      @sandrafinbar ปีที่แล้ว +7

      @@suzanablank5809 I don't think there are any children. Migraine was not pregnant at all. She had a hysterectomy many years ago. That photo was Rebecca Cord, a child model. Have we ever seen the real children? Migraine is mad.

    • @marijolivitzky4336
      @marijolivitzky4336 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@suzanablank5809 It's not fake news. Have you watched the video of the Royal Reviewer? Watch his video , he's an excellent reviewer not like others. The breaking news was also posted on facebook.

    • @grufudd1
      @grufudd1 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      the royals know those kids are not from the female grifters womb. look at the fact the royals came out in the media for Edwards new titles but never once did for archie and lili

    • @maryskinner1329
      @maryskinner1329 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Probably hoped the plane would go down. Didn’t Meghan say Harry is one plane flight from being King.

  • @newtonlee7849
    @newtonlee7849 ปีที่แล้ว +27

    Interesting that Prince Edward chose not to use similar titles for his children ( Prince, Princess). Why then would Harry & Megan ? No class Megan knows firsthand the possible $$ value that comes with the title.

  • @laurieroland4460
    @laurieroland4460 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I did not realize that the dastardly duo had been he ability to give titles? Does that mean their new first names are Prince and Princess like a couple of dogs? Of course, Duke and duchess are used for dogs too.

  • @dawnhoward1268
    @dawnhoward1268 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Does this mean that when Prince William ascends the throne that Harry's children will not be able to use the Prince and Princess titles? Referring to King George the V's letters patent.

  • @stuartlee6622
    @stuartlee6622 ปีที่แล้ว +105

    It's not their baby.

  • @wendelynyoung8609
    @wendelynyoung8609 ปีที่แล้ว +30

    As I’ve heard say, people name their pets princess

  • @isabelserrano6018
    @isabelserrano6018 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    With relatives like the Sussex's I wouldn't go either😂😂😂

  • @peterjackson4623
    @peterjackson4623 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I feel bad for all the grandchildren in this dysfunctional family. Maybe these patterns can be broken by them once they are adults. I do believe once you allow narcissism to get hold, it’s nothing but crazy making from that point on. They leave everyone spinning and break up relationships in the pursuit of getting what they want. Truly sad for a lot of families who deal with a narcissistic personality.

  • @toniakerley2536
    @toniakerley2536 ปีที่แล้ว +106

    The King didn’t give the kids titles, so they made up there own… those to incredibly insane.

    • @benedict_323
      @benedict_323 ปีที่แล้ว

      They have been officially acknowledged as Prince and Princess of the United Kingdom.

    • @judithscobee8102
      @judithscobee8102 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      King & Queen of Montecito!

    • @judithscobee8102
      @judithscobee8102 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@benedict_323 no they haven’t, King hasn’t bestowed titles on them!

    • @Kiss_lynda
      @Kiss_lynda ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@benedict_323 royal website says differently. And after every official title announcement for Williams family and others was changed immediately. 😂

    • @benedict_323
      @benedict_323 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@judithscobee8102 I think you'll find they have Judith. It's wonderful news isn't

  • @zzzbbbooo
    @zzzbbbooo ปีที่แล้ว +140

    So, the royal website is changing the titles of these children from Master and Miss to Prince and Princess on the behest of Harold and Rachel? I don't think so!

    • @parematahanara2199
      @parematahanara2199 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      Load of bull.

    • @OhJodi69
      @OhJodi69 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Letters Patent of 1917. Wise up.

    • @em77775
      @em77775 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@OhJodi69 they would have updated it by now

    • @directorme6669
      @directorme6669 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@em77775 some people ( megshit fans) are claiming it's been updated! Is that true?

    • @judithargitay9860
      @judithargitay9860 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@directorme6669 Nope. It's still Miss and Master. In ANY other case the changes are made THE MOMENT the titles are announced by the monarch written or verbal, like with the Prince and Princess of Wales. Here....almost a week has passed and nothing.

  • @ChloeTh
    @ChloeTh ปีที่แล้ว +1

    "Seeing as Titles are suddenly
    important!"😅!
    Well done that man; pointing
    that out - we salute you!🤗💜🙏🇬🇧🌏💜

  • @katrinestorebo
    @katrinestorebo 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Why on earth would someone put who didn't attend on the statement.

  • @kalicokathy1944
    @kalicokathy1944 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    What did they expect only want to be included with Royalty when it’s beneficial to them

  • @sp-pz8uc
    @sp-pz8uc ปีที่แล้ว +14

    Makes you wonder why they named her littlebit if they hate the Royal family so much.

    • @frumpusnumpus
      @frumpusnumpus ปีที่แล้ว +3

      And from what I heard, Archie is actually Prince George's pet name within the family. So they took that too!

  • @sharonchant7115
    @sharonchant7115 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    But there is a rule that stipulates that A royal baby must been born of the Royal mother's body there used to witnesses attending the birth to make sure there is no skulduggery going on

  • @gregkenning9238
    @gregkenning9238 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    An even bigger mistake is that they are allegedly using the daughter of Stassi Schroeder, Hartford, as Lilibucks.

  • @SuzzyB52
    @SuzzyB52 ปีที่แล้ว +21

    When is this GD nightmare going to end. UK Government can't get their act together to remove titles. I'm going to stick my head in the sand, every time I see anything related to this damned annoying part. One question, has it been proven, Nutmeg actually gave birth????

    • @caroleperry1138
      @caroleperry1138 ปีที่แล้ว

      You are right there the UK government definately can't get their act together on anything at the moment we need a general election.

    • @MandySam13
      @MandySam13 ปีที่แล้ว

      The titles should have been removed as soon as they lied on the Oprah interview. The RF’s mistake was giving an inch to these two vipers.

  • @kateorwell7203
    @kateorwell7203 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    Only the Monarch can officially bestow, and recognize the titles. Meg has usurped the King's authority.

    • @elaineleoszewski9362
      @elaineleoszewski9362 ปีที่แล้ว

      She is always trying to over ride everybody's authority.

  • @penjim2013
    @penjim2013 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    MM can't travel 70 miles to visit her father, but expected the RF to travel 5000 miles, at short notice, to visit a child they have met once....if that.
    Penny from Christchurch. 🇬🇧

  • @gailcollins9512
    @gailcollins9512 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Why do we keep seeing a photo of a child that is not their child?? Why doesn’t anybody talk about this? I have yet to see a genuine photo of Lillibet??????

  • @OdeInWessex
    @OdeInWessex ปีที่แล้ว +115

    No picture, no proof so I don't believe it - any of it. Until the Royal Family update the website or formally announce that Charles has granted those children the Prince and Princess titles I don't believe that either. Markle has a habit of making announcements over the things she WANTS to happen in the hope of pressurising people into giving her what she wants. This hasn't worked on the RF for years now, I can't see it working now.

    • @33BiBix77
      @33BiBix77 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Typical habit of them

    • @sandrab2589
      @sandrab2589 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      The Royal Website was updated today. Charles has caved, yet again. So much for the "long game" he supposedly was playing. Charles only cares about Charles.

    • @stevebird7265
      @stevebird7265 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      They are not titles, just christened names! Same as Tom, Dick or Harry! Anyone can christen their kids Prince or Princess, but doe's not make it so!

    • @adacox8258
      @adacox8258 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Line of succession updated

    • @hb1338
      @hb1338 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@sandrab2589 Charles is much wiser than you, and certainly wise enough not to provoke a fight with his family.

  • @pollyanna1112
    @pollyanna1112 ปีที่แล้ว +107

    So let's get this straight.... Archie was born, H+M said We will name him Archie Harrison Mountbatten-Windsor. They had to seek permission to use Mountbatten-Windsor, as he was meant to be Archie Harrison (no surname or use Sussex like the Cambridge's did or the boy could use Wales as Harry's dad was the Prince of Wales at the time.) Of course they wanted a fancy hyphenated name. They also announced He will not be a Prince because we wish to raise him as a private citizen so he can live a normal life. * Then OPRAH - Meg says They wouldn't even give him the title of Prince WHAT...hmm, WHY... Because of the concerns of the colour if his skin, umm the potential colour of his skin...WHAT...WHO...WHO IS SAYING THIS ... Then Archie gets Christened in the CHURCH OF ENGLAND, like his dad was and like Meghan was CONVERTED to just before their wedding. She had been christened in the CHURCH OF EPISCOPAL in USA - not Catholic, she just went to Catholic school coz daddy wanted her to have a good education and daddy paid for it whilst daddy raised her coz mommy was missing - 💰🚨🔗🔒🚭💨🚬 anyway.... Fast forward, they move to USA on Tyler Perry's Private JET that is worth $125,000,000 🛫✈️ and Lilibet Diana M-W was born in America. Over a year later, they get her Baptised. Tyler Perry is the God Father which explains his recent weekend 20 minute flight in his JET to their house. He boarded his jet in casual clothes, got off his jet in a Suit, into his $200,000.00 Lamborghini car with his Body Guard to Meg + Harry's. He had told Meghan he would only be God Father if it wasn't in England "with those people" and not in a Church of England. It was to be in an Episcopal Church. And low n behold, the girl is Christened in Church of Episcopal by a Bishop of the Church. Not by the Archbishop as ScoobyDoo stated as the name he said, is not the actual Archbishop of that Church. So now it seems - Harry - born in England, baptised Church of England in England. Archie born in England, baptised Church of England in England. Meghan was born in America, birth certificate states Caucasian (you know WHITE not biracial or black or half n half or A-A) initially baptised Church of Episcopal in America then converted to Church of England in England in order to marry Harry in England. Then Lilibet was born America, baptised in Church of Episcopal. So technically HARRYs daughter who is his SPARE Heir, was born in a different country to her brother and daddy, her brother who is number one HEIR, and she is the only family member of all four, to now be of the faith Episcopal since mommy, daddy and brother are Church of England. Oh WOWZA....LILIBET will have serious SPARE ISSUES. Add to it, her name isn't a real name, it's a nickname. Boy oh boy, she has hit the bottom of the SPARE LOTTERY 🇦🇺

    • @Mutasis_Mutandis
      @Mutasis_Mutandis ปีที่แล้ว

      Oh, so Tyler Perry is racist?

    • @Jan-sn5tk
      @Jan-sn5tk ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Seen sometime in the past that mm converted to Catholic then to Jewish(or the other way round to marry her 2 previous husbands before converting to Coffee changes her religion as often as her tatty wigs. Edit: don't know how Anglican got changed to coffee !!!

    • @ingridmorrison8070
      @ingridmorrison8070 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Sorry but laughing so hard at the stubitity that need to use the throne at my home.
      I love comedy. Keep it up M&H

    • @coling3957
      @coling3957 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      thankfully Harry and the whole tribe of his - real people or otherwise are no longer SPARE. i have as much chance of becoming King as Harry. ever since William became a father, Harry became redundant as far as succession concerned. maybe 200 years ago it might have meant something, when infants often did not survive into adulthood - and you had King George III die to be succeeded by his son George - who left no heir - and then William the "spare" of the time - who also had no children. When he died it was his niece, Victoria , who was daughter of another brother who had died some years before. William has 2 sons and a daughter. and excellent medical care. Harry and his dubious "children" are extras of no consequence. .

    • @ingridmorrison8070
      @ingridmorrison8070 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      That's about got it. Just need proof whose kid she & Archie real are.

  • @pamt7740
    @pamt7740 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The real mothers of those kids have stepped up and denied they are A and L. Beats me why the press still use the photo's. Former workers of the household have also said 'There were no children' As for duo, they are not only iced by the RF but the US in hollywood they are iced and a laughing stock, now, the magazines and the designers are icing them. Sacked by Netflix and the list is growing including politics! The RF could NOT attend as they were booked for engagements months in advance and the duo knew this! Mad megs has said she will never return to the UK. Harry in an interview said reconcilliation is difficult even though he is happy to work on it and the RF are too, a 'third party' (guess who - is making it impossible.)

  • @debramoss2267
    @debramoss2267 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    We watched her silly con bump fall down around her ankles in a local visit. What are they playing at?!

  • @girlfromoz712
    @girlfromoz712 ปีที่แล้ว +59

    What “formal” occasion’s will these children attend that they’ll need to use theirs titles? First day of school? Arriving at a friends birthday party? Attending the Oscars? Genuinely curious.

    • @marianpower6711
      @marianpower6711 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Your right,what formal occasions,they are not working royals,so there will not be any formal occasions😏

    • @coling3957
      @coling3957 ปีที่แล้ว

      they aren't even real. literally noone has seen them - even Harry's pal James Corden visitied with his wife and said there was no sign of children in the house... nothing at all to indicate there were any. everyone has been to people's homes when they had small children - its unmissable - stuff all over the place, toys, clothes, kiddie barriers and the smell ofc :D .. no wonder the interweb is full of stories about them being either surrogates, or Hires or even plastic dolls! :D

    • @suzanablank5809
      @suzanablank5809 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@marianpower6711 I believe KC let it be so kids do not grow up resenting PG, PC and PL.

    • @marionrobson9384
      @marionrobson9384 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Irrelevant titles basically.

    • @1959doll
      @1959doll ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Maybe the opening of a new Burger King or White Castle????

  • @SassySami2020
    @SassySami2020 ปีที่แล้ว +201

    Well, that's disappointing if KC allow these children to have prince and princess titles.

    • @benedict_323
      @benedict_323 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      The moment he became king they were officially Prince and Princess of the United Kingdom. It's only most recently The King has allowed them to be styled as Prince and Princess.

    • @lisakendall1822
      @lisakendall1822 ปีที่แล้ว

      Why is it disappointing? They can't help how stupid their parents are.

    • @piapadmore430
      @piapadmore430 ปีที่แล้ว

      Especially children being raised in the US. Disappointing.

    • @julieranzieri777
      @julieranzieri777 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Omg I agree

    • @lindaross4331
      @lindaross4331 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      @@benedict_323 Not at all. If you read the decree it says the children of the first born son. Harry's are at the discretion of the King.

  • @loud7739
    @loud7739 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    They gave the bishop a new title! and changed his religion to Roman Catholic , arch error 😂

  • @patsygodfrey9565
    @patsygodfrey9565 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I thought certified certificate of birth had to be verified by the royal legals.