The problem with this is that our brain has evolved to interpret sounds in terms of something already understood. It's a survival mechanism. That sound behind us might be a predator stalking us. We have also heard the sounds of nature like water flowing, rocks splitting and falling or fire. Often his carefully sculpted patterns of different frequencies and amplitudes with a random sounding rhythm sound like these events in nature. We have interpreted the sounds as random and accidental rather than as being intelligently composed patterns like Bach.
![Lecture 5 - [Part 1/3] Karlheinz Stockhausen - Four Criteria of Electronic Music (KONTAKTE), (1972)](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/7xyGtI7KKIY/mqdefault.jpg)
![Lecture 5 - [Part 1/3] Karlheinz Stockhausen - Four Criteria of Electronic Music (KONTAKTE), (1972)](/img/tr.png)
Wonderful!!!!!
After Webern my new obsession is Stockhausen. I love him!!
yes yes, you dont have to post this on every video
absolutely genious
pure Genius
7,845
44"33 ahn i see the influence of your splitting this videos
🤯
34:28
The problem with this is that our brain has evolved to interpret sounds in terms of something already understood. It's a survival mechanism. That sound behind us might be a predator stalking us. We have also heard the sounds of nature like water flowing, rocks splitting and falling or fire. Often his carefully sculpted patterns of different frequencies and amplitudes with a random sounding rhythm sound like these events in nature. We have interpreted the sounds as random and accidental rather than as being intelligently composed patterns like Bach.
Yes, I appreciate your thoughts on this because while listening, the thought that came was, association.