Sarkhan, Soul Aflame - Historic Brawl - MTG Arena

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 19 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 81

  • @davestier6247
    @davestier6247 ปีที่แล้ว +130

    Having your infinite hand size reduced by 7 really provides a lot of value

    • @439801RS
      @439801RS ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Unlike this comment

    • @davestier6247
      @davestier6247 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      @439801RS oh no, you didn't find my comment pleasing? My disappointment is immeasurable, my day ruined.

    • @smolbean2170
      @smolbean2170 ปีที่แล้ว

      I don’t follow :[ I feel stupid

    • @davestier6247
      @davestier6247 ปีที่แล้ว

      @smolbean2170 even though the opponent had Jin Gitaxias Core Augur out, which would normally reduce his max hand size 7 ( to zero, causing him to have to pitch any remaining cards in his hand at the end of each of his turns , the way layers in magic work, he was able to nullify this by having no maximum hand size.

    • @endermeap6488
      @endermeap6488 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It’s not a layers interaction, it’s just that infinity-7 is still infinite

  • @basswastaken
    @basswastaken ปีที่แล้ว +52

    Ancient Silver Dragon is such an awesome card, and you get two of them with Sarkhan!

    • @LegenVD
      @LegenVD  ปีที่แล้ว +55

      It's worth its weight in... Silver?

  • @soybomb777
    @soybomb777 ปีที่แล้ว +29

    Whenever I see First Sliver piloting good stuff it makes me think of King Kong. Slivvy just wants to run around and be free with it's sliver friends but humans captured it to exploit for profit.

  • @fuduzlp
    @fuduzlp ปีที่แล้ว +4

    A friend of mine and me share an account where we have your last 30ish brawl decks. Being able to play brawl with so many decks is a lot of fun, so thanks for the value!

    • @LegenVD
      @LegenVD  ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Sounds great!

  • @arthurgwg
    @arthurgwg ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Game 1 that Silver Dragon line is why LVD is the best MTG content creator there is!

  • @CyberBuster93
    @CyberBuster93 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    LOVE to see the Historic Brawl content, Luca! This deck is as awesome as the last! Keep up the great work, and take care!!!!

  • @Majdog
    @Majdog ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Broooooo these are so fun to watch need more historic💯

  • @Rokuro1
    @Rokuro1 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Legenvd, i know you cant JUST do historic brawl videos
    But if you did it would make me very happy. Ive copied like 5+ of your decks. Props my dude

  • @monsoon1234567890
    @monsoon1234567890 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    As a longtime MTGO player I just can't get into Arena, but I love watching your Historic Brawl videos.

    • @LegenVD
      @LegenVD  ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Glad you like them!

  • @manbagan
    @manbagan ปีที่แล้ว +9

    do you think you could make a video explaining how you build brawl, or even commander decks specifically? your decks are always very well put together and great to watch. When I try to build one myself it always feels like im missing something.

    • @LegenVD
      @LegenVD  ปีที่แล้ว +15

      I've done a few videos where I build decks from scratch, including this Siona Brawl deck:
      th-cam.com/video/JgUgZ7HrMEE/w-d-xo.html

  • @emilianogomez113
    @emilianogomez113 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    I believe you could have given the ancient copper dragon haste vs calix by using the discounted reckless barbarian like a ritual(gives you enough to cast orb of dragonkind into the dragon).

    • @LegenVD
      @LegenVD  ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Indeed, although assuming we make some mana with one Copper Dragon it might still be better to enable Hoard with Barbarian instead.

  • @thcdreams654
    @thcdreams654 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I still run out the old Sarkhan deck you made once in a while. I'll probably give this one a shot too. Thanks.

  • @husky964
    @husky964 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The first game is so funny. You look like a main character of the duel!

  • @EmeraldTG
    @EmeraldTG ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I played Phyrexian Vraska against someone using the One Ring. They had like 13 life, so I just proliferated their One Ring and let it kill them lol.

    • @RibusPQR
      @RibusPQR ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Hahahahaha, nice

  • @Mattball82
    @Mattball82 ปีที่แล้ว

    Man I had a Shivan Dragon in 1994. How far Magic has come!

  • @bryantan4228
    @bryantan4228 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    18:22 Better to activate Sarkhan for mana, play Terror, trigger Lathliss, respond to terror trigger with two Lathliss activations, burn their face for 7 down to 21, then swing for lethal

    • @LegenVD
      @LegenVD  ปีที่แล้ว +4

      They don't have Haste, so that wouldn't work.

    • @bryantan4228
      @bryantan4228 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@LegenVD Somehow I thought Lathliss gave haste lol

  • @markburnash8678
    @markburnash8678 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    "...Wayfarers Bauble..."
    *Mitch from CQ enters the chat*

    • @davestier6247
      @davestier6247 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      First up provides a lot of value

  • @rmgmars
    @rmgmars ปีที่แล้ว +1

    perfect timing literally building rn in paper too

  • @Skyhighjettalone
    @Skyhighjettalone ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Was there no room for "There and Back Again"? Been a while since the last Alchemy enabled deck, this was its chance to shine

    • @LegenVD
      @LegenVD  ปีที่แล้ว +2

      It was one of the last few cuts. Having to wait several turns before we get Smaug makes it less ideal for this deck, we also wouldn't get a discount from Sarkhan.

  • @Bluecho4
    @Bluecho4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Sarkhan: "DRAGONS!"

  • @BlueBarren115
    @BlueBarren115 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Man I'm so lukewarm to those prints, but if they sold the black lotus separately I would be all over that.

  • @DanyF02
    @DanyF02 ปีที่แล้ว

    21:10 Pretty ballsy move from opponent to shock-in a land just to put companion in hand. Costed them dearly.

  • @dandelionplays
    @dandelionplays ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The last timestamp has a typo as "Radagat" instead of "Radagast" if that matters

  • @AzafTazarden
    @AzafTazarden ปีที่แล้ว

    The Sam and Frodo synergy is very flavorful

  • @NightKev
    @NightKev ปีที่แล้ว

    ~33:00 - It might have been better to only cast lotus and only attack with Goldspan so that Mangara didn't trigger, since the 2 damage and 1/1 aren't very valuable there.

  • @davidhower7095
    @davidhower7095 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Couldn’t you have played the Shivan Dragons in that last game? Sarkhan lets you pay X instead of their mana cost if you used the discount ability

    • @LegenVD
      @LegenVD  ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Had already used Sarkhan that turn, but otherwise that would've been the plan!

  • @seanc786
    @seanc786 ปีที่แล้ว

    Would’ve been nice to have seen Dragonmaster Outcast. Enjoy your decks!

    • @LegenVD
      @LegenVD  ปีที่แล้ว

      It's a cool card, but difficult to enable without more land ramp.
      Also lacks a little bit of synergy with Sarkhan not giving it a discount.

  • @_Fabian_
    @_Fabian_ ปีที่แล้ว +2

    At 20:00 i think playing commander sarkhan would have been better for getting as much damage as possible in, as he could have copied inferno and also attacked with haste

    • @LegenVD
      @LegenVD  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yes, got the dragons mixed up. Would've been a good option for sure.

  • @LlywellynOBrien
    @LlywellynOBrien ปีที่แล้ว

    36:31 what's up with exert or undeclare here. A bug?

  • @PrismaMajor
    @PrismaMajor ปีที่แล้ว

    I'm surprised that you didn't use "There and Back Again" to bring out Smaug.

    • @LegenVD
      @LegenVD  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It was one of the last few cuts. Having to wait several turns before we get Smaug makes it less ideal for this deck, we also wouldn't get a discount from Sarkhan.

  • @Hitzel
    @Hitzel ปีที่แล้ว

    If Flash was legal it would be sooo funny with this Commander

  • @mcbescheiden725
    @mcbescheiden725 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    36:40 the classic play around the wrong card. Im an expert in that.

  • @derondorsey6366
    @derondorsey6366 ปีที่แล้ว

    How did you get so many dragon cards because that's my favorite

    • @LegenVD
      @LegenVD  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I've been playing Arena for a while 😉 "Baldur's Gate" and the "D&D Forgotten Realms" set have a pretty high density of cool Dragon cards if you're looking for a specific set to open.

  • @xXPatriotVirusXx
    @xXPatriotVirusXx ปีที่แล้ว

    What do you use as a deck editor / builder? I wonder if archidekt or moxfield would sponsor you to feature their deck editor.

    • @LegenVD
      @LegenVD  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I build the decks in-game, but I've used Moxfield before.

    • @xXPatriotVirusXx
      @xXPatriotVirusXx ปีที่แล้ว

      @@LegenVD thanks for the reply! Keep up the great work.

  • @njnjhjh8918
    @njnjhjh8918 ปีที่แล้ว

    DRAAGONS!

  • @klaiken989
    @klaiken989 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Why won't they just bring us back to Tarkir already!?

    • @davidhower7095
      @davidhower7095 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      The entire Tarkir block is next in line to come to Arena, and they confirmed we’re going back in 2025

    • @klaiken989
      @klaiken989 ปีที่แล้ว

      @davidhower7095 2 years from now....
      Ty for the info though!

  • @LiveLongAndProsperHonestly
    @LiveLongAndProsperHonestly ปีที่แล้ว

    That card where you roll a d20 and get treasures is potentially fucking silly.
    I was wondering how on earth would anyone ever find the mana to get +14 on that one dragon that deals 20 damage when it's power hits 20 and I was like "why is that in this deck? hes never gonna have that mana is he?" and then I saw you drop TEN TREASURES and I was like "ah, now it makes sense."

  • @Richthofen100
    @Richthofen100 ปีที่แล้ว

    You ran out of cards in some games. Should one add more cards draw if one were to build this deck?

    • @LegenVD
      @LegenVD  ปีที่แล้ว

      Definitely an option.

  • @douglasingersoll7486
    @douglasingersoll7486 ปีที่แล้ว

    😊

  • @mdz8758
    @mdz8758 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Why does everyone seem to play phyrexian metamorph over surgical metamorph? Its just a strictly worse version of surgical which can copy lands, enchantments and most importantly planeswalkers (Normally Bolos)

    • @LegenVD
      @LegenVD  ปีที่แล้ว +3

      I'm not too familiar with Alchemy cards since I usually avoid them.

    • @nurikhsan8821
      @nurikhsan8821 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Alchemy cards are specifically designed to be digital only and can't be feasibly played in real life situation. Yes, you can include them for fun. But still, they aren't real cards.
      IMO, a proper and good deckbuilding should also be feasible to real life game situation.

    • @mdz8758
      @mdz8758 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@nurikhsan8821 Makes sense. Although unlike most alchemy cards theres really no reason why Surgical metamorph cant be a real card. If you can keep track of day and night theres no reason you cant keep track of which player went first.

    • @mdz8758
      @mdz8758 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@LegenVD fair enough

    • @kamikazebanzai1005
      @kamikazebanzai1005 ปีที่แล้ว

      Cause fuck alchemy