ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 10 มี.ค. 2010
- A featurette from the Persona DVD including Ingmar Bergman, Liv Ullmann, Bibi Andersson and Marc Gervais.
From www.kqek.com/dvd_reviews/p2r/2...
While the DVD's commentary track leans towards the critical-lite, the making-of featurette does an excellent job in using Persona as a platform to discuss Bergman's personal trauma that inspired a series of self-reflective filmic plays on the degeneration of the human mind & personality during the Sixties. Using interviews of Gervais, Liv Ullman, Bibi Andersson, and archival interview clips of the director from the Canadian program Man Alive from 1970, one also discovers the film's effect on the cast testing careers, and in the case of Bergman and Ullman, affecting their personal lives. It becomes clear why, for Bergman fans, Persona is such a daring work. - ภาพยนตร์และแอนิเมชัน
Bibi Anderson is still beautiful. One of the best movie out there and also one of the strangest
I love Bibi Andersson! 8:30 you can tell she's a boss -subtly telling us that not all that is gold, glitters. Although, Persona is a incredible film, which has struck me in quite a profound cerebral but not very emotional way.
this guy was a genious, damn
I disagree with Ingmar's idea on the supreme perfect but I love the way he made movies beautifully and artistically.
I don't want to sound like a Philistine, but I thought the film was pretentious nonsense.
Nonsense ? If you don't know Bergmans's thematics, "Persona" is not appropriate te begin with Bergman's movies. I recommend to start with others Bergman's movies as "The Seventh Seal" or "Autumn Sonata" for examples.
Pretentiousness comes when somebody has nothing to say, but tries to make it come off like they’re saying everything.
Say what you will about Ingmar Bergman, he had a lot to say about the world, whether or not you agree with his perspective.
@Great Destroyer God tier reply
there is an awful tendency in Britain and probably elsewhere in the English speaking world of dismissing great work as pretentious just cause it is not a popcorn movie.
If you are not capable of appreciating Persona that's your problem. It sounds like you are missing the whole point. It happens, sometimes we are not looking at it with the right mindset.
The first time I saw an Antonioni film I didn't get it, i found it boring and didnt really understand what all the hype was about. But scenes from the film kept on coming back to me until i had to watch it again a few months later and then I loved it and I realized I had completely missed the point the first time around. This happened to me with several films, including the first Bergman film I saw, Cries and Whispers. I was 18 and found it really tedious and painful and thought "it's well made, but it was agonizingly painful to watch, i'll never watch it again". Ten years later i saw it again and i found it exhilarating!!! How could i have been so blind to it years earlier?? Despite being about a woman's agonizingly slow death for the entire movie, dealing with a painful subject in a very slow and joyless manner, i was exhilarated by the end cause i had witness such a great piece of art, such a depth of understanding of the human psyche... i felt like i had learnt so much from watching it the second time around. It was such a beautiful film.
Persona is a masterpiece of such magnitude though that i had no trouble recognizing it as such the very first time i saw it when i was 18. I hope you'll grow to like it one day.
@@JosuVaquerizo Can you tell which Antonioni movie you were talking about?
Thanks