OMG, when I saw the raise at the flop, I was thinking "easy fold", when I saw the bet on the turn, I was thinking "easy fold" and of course when I saw the small bet on the river, I was thinking of course "easy fold". And that's why I'm not a pro player like Daniel. Excelent hand breakdown, thanks!
Every advanced bluff only works v players who see it’s possibility. Just like when less capable players check call then bet/shove river when the front door draw comes…they’re not bluffing so you have to fold top 2 or sets rather than think “of course I’d bluff this river given texture/action” cause they don’t see the bluff spots or understand the logic behind them.
🎯 Your point isn’t talked about enough. I’ll add, while there’s value in “gto strategy”, live poker is and has always been a social game. Find a way to beat the opponent/table that you’re at, at that time. Dewey Tomko has been a poker pro for 4 decades and is still playing. He’s made millions. His approach has been to play to the table. Be flexible. Exploitation is what’s made Phil Ivey arguably the best player in the world. He’s never once studied a gto chart or solver etc. Gto cultists fail to understand that trying to play like a robot will kill the game. The poker boom of the early-mid 00’s would’ve never happened if the players were like how so many are today. Even the commentator in this video (Nick?) is like a wet blanket. No chance the average person who comes across a poker video/show with him commentating is going to be drawn in like they all were with Mike Sexton, Vince van Patton, Gabe Kaplin, etc.
@@chevelle1 definitely agree with what you’re saying, but phil Ivey in recent years has looked at gto charts. He’s still extremely exploitative which is why he’s the greatest of all time (even though today he probably would get eaten alive at super high rollers) but he’s had to adapt at least a little bit to become more balanced with his ranges
@@chevelle1 you know what else I’ve noticed that seems lost in todays poker “teachings/concepts” is a very basic yet arguably the most valuable “read” is simple logic behind bet sizing purpose. Obviously balance is critical but seems too often the simple “If bet is for value, what does my hand look like as played to the river for villain to bet ‘polar’ and actually get called?” After all value bets are primarily intended for value. Maybe I’m completely wrong but by river the range should be highly defined and too often the sizing simply makes no sense for value yet…many GTO players over fold.
This is a great example of a thought process from a good thinking player when playing against another good thinking player. Against inexperienced players, a bluff on that river doesnt just get called, it either gets snap-called or shoved on by someone who is thinking about Vegas and the bleeping Mirage and thinks they have the nuts. But against a good player that really thinks about what bets mean, it actually makes sense. I love how Daniel also thinks even deeper than that though with table momentum and whatnot even though hed still have a healthy stack if the bluff didnt work, really fascinating all around.
Man the last little bit about spots, is spot on :p but yeah knowing the lines to your spots and which lines you took look like they can lead to different spots you can represent I think is one of the best advices I've heard out of the high-roller series. Dnegs
When I first started poker Daniel you were my hero I learned so much form just watching you own people's souls and many years later I am still learning a lot from you Thank You
1 combo of 22, 1 combo of TT, 6 combos of QT, 3 combos of QQ. He has a T so he can rule out 4 of those combinations. That means he would fear only 7 total hand combinations... all of which make sense as played. However, suited club connectors, gappers, and AXc would have all played this hand the same (I'm not removing AKs AQs because you've shown that you protect your limping range by also limping big hands ALTHOUGH I suspect you are more likely to raise with AKs AQs than AA for the fold equity.) So I count 26 hands you might turn into bluffs here vs. 4 actual winners. Even if we subtract all the Aces (to allow him to have Ac to block our bluffs) there's still 16. Not to mention that all AA KK QQ JJ might have played the hand the same. I think the bet would have gotten called very quickly. EDITED: Typed 4 twice instead of 11-4=7. Thank you Yun S!
I have to say, Negreanu is my all-time favorite player. I never thought I'd like watching poker as an adult, but it's surprisingly fun. Him and just a handful of other players. When I found out he had a coach, I think like a lot of people, I automatically assumed that the coach was better, and it kind of changed my perspective on the world of poker. We fans with no knowledge of how poker really works (i.e. the world of poker) see all these TH-cam videos and just kind of assume that the Phil-Ivey types are just the best there's ever been. That, the game has evolved and is now a completely different beast than it was even 20 years ago. But, then, when I saw he had a coach and was playing against him publicly at some point, I think like a lot of people who don't know any better, my assumption was that he must therefore be better than Daniel. One has to wonder though: as good as he likely is and as much as he understands about the theory and so on and so forth, if he were really so great, then why isn't he a millionaire and why isn't he famous for his skills? There could be other factors (family, came to the game late, has always preferred the theory side of things) but if there's this hidden world of coaches that are better than the Negreanus and Iveys of the world, then where are they all hiding?
Interesting spot. Raise is interesting option on the river. You're going to have 11 pure value combos so for a pot sized raise you'll need like 5/6 bluffs. Question is if you can find 5 better bluffs than A3. For example, do 99,88, 77 without a club work well as bluffs. I feel they probably should but they also have slightly more showdown than A3 which could chop with Ax of clubs once in a blue moon. Also what are you doing with Like AA KK JJ. They're probably the wrong bluffs imo as A10,K10, J10 might all be in Nicks 3-bet range sometimes. I'm quite unsure what the best bluffs would be here as Nick literally has all his 10s. I'm thinking probably an A isn't the worse card to bluff with given that pocket pairs without a club can probably call slightly more than Ax given that Petrangelo takes this line with Ax of clubs. Also not sure if Nick would 3-bet A10 more or less than like K10 or J10. Definitely a spot where I could see a raise being the correct play although a fold makes by far the most sense as getting Nick to lay down a 10 seems slightly optimistic
Would be very interested in hearing the perspective of the other player here. EG Daniel speaking his point and then hearing what Nicky P was thinking too.
I wonder what the ideal bluffing combo is (for humans I assume solvers have a million partials). I'm thinking it might be AcQx because a Q isn't that different from A high in terms of bluff catching but is a very relevant blocker. That also gives you 7 value hands and 3 bluffs so a 600K (ICM probably changes this number a bit) bluff makes them indifferent between calling or folding a T. Normally you don't want to block auto folds in clubs but given that if you aren't bluffing AQ you should be calling with it I assume it is different here.
Also on the potential call on the river, does it not stand that the river bet would be 1/2 pot if he holds 2 clubs only? 110k screams of "I want to be called". That said, I appreciate if you did push 400 in, as you said, he would really be in a spot.
Poker tournaments are a tough game, you have to pick some spots and raise and C-bet and bluff or fold good hands pre and post/ turn and river or get best value to accumulate chips. Folding and farming good hands and getting value out of marginal hands against ppl using wider ranges ie fish, like Daniel lol. .
I was just in a spot like this and buddy over bet jammed 10x + on a low double paired board. I got tempted and called for my tournament life with low suited ace. This made me feel slightly better than a huge donkey 😂
I can't let playing 44 here go unchallenged, given the situation especially, into 2 players repping strength, and you state not much help for 44 coming on the turn, why would you think you might be able to bluff off potentially 2 players with trip 10? Play for me is to always fold there without thinking
I wonder if you can just put your whole stack of time bank cards in there and pull back what's left instead of worrying about being at 10 seconds over and over while you're tanking?
I check-shoved a river once as a bluff on a double paired board where I had AK with no pair. So the board was something like what it was here, TT225. It was in a $1,100 tournament, but my opponent was a good player. I thought he was pure bluffing. He wasn’t. He folded the 2 (or whatever it was in that hand) for the lower possible full house. He asked me the next day what I had and I told him. I don’t think he was happy. I don’t think there are many players in $1,100 tournaments who are capable of folding a full house, but luckily for me, he was a good, thinking player.
He gave you a few spots to spew with those bet sizes. I don’t think he gives you credit for better if you didn’t take the cheese on the turn. I think he snaps a river raise. Would love to hear what Nick was thinking after betting your A high to call how he would play his hand to a raise. I just feel like theoretically off these stacks you never let that go to anything. I don’t think he would give you QQ on a button limp bc how weird it would play post and he has Tx massively blocked. It just doesn’t feel like a good story.
I'm confused how pocket 2's you or he could have never entered your mind!!......I think a play at trying to get him to fold could only work with an all in......and that still not really feasible in my opinion
I think you should definitely raise here more often than not. Your reasoning makes sense Daniel, but you didn’t consider the fact that you under-repped top set so when you raise, you’re only polarized to 89 here because I don’t think 55’s could even raise here. I’m sure Nicky could have large range of hands that he still pays you off with like TT, KK, AA, QJ, QT, etc. I honestly believe a raise here would be a great line solely because you under repped JJ. Counter argument?
Lose to 22 ;) that would have been a sick hand if you had because it may have played out the same exact way,...post flop, but likely you would have raised it up pre so maybe 22 could be discounted from your hand.
To be honest I don't think a raise would have worked, at least not against me. Nick holding a 10, means he knows you can't have pocket 10s, so only QT and ducks are beating you. What are the odds you haveing the case 10 and one of three queens or the two missing 2s, exactly 4 out of 2,598,960 possible starting hands. A little thin.. if Nick had a 2 instead, a raise would have worked for sure. Do you agree?
I’m just a complete fish(obviously) but are there really 2598960 starting hands? I thought the figure was nearer 1400 which is considerably less but hey what do I know:))
@@julianhodgson1961 Ops me too, your totally right, mixed that up with possible combinations after the river consisting of 5 cards 😅 And I forgot to consider pocket Queens as well. So 7 out of 1326 it is!
DN got me confused. He's both saying that if he's making a raise of that modest size, he's never bluffing. At the same time, the thought of bluffing crossed his mind and he didn't mention any other bet size. Is NP folding this full house to a 660k raise even 1 % of the time, with that stack? Lol. I dunno, I feel like Daniel wanted to talk about a less talked about topic here but the hand he chose wasn't that good to illustrate the point.
It's an easy flop bet. He forced Bonomo off a much better hand than him and he's also betting for protection and to just take the pot down here. If the blinds have two random hands that have nothing, say 98os and 76os, he's letting those hands outdraw him for free and potentially even bluff him off his ace high on future streets. If you aren't betting flop here you hate money and just don't understand poker.
I don't understand, Why give us this lecture with an example where he didn't actually do it? Isn't it better to show us one where he actually did..? 😹😹
Daniel nu stiu daca vezi mesaju desi mi-as dori din suflet sa il citesti , am o dorinta cat mai traiesc imi poti face cadou un buldoexcavator te rog , sa il tin ca amintire , te urmaresc cu drag
The Ontario government just blocked Canadians from playing with other people from outside the province. The regular brick and mortar casinos were losing too much revenue ( to online poker ), so it's Black Friday in Ontario and probably every other province in Canada. If you play Poker professionally then people move to Vegas or Asia ( Thailand / Hong Kong etc. ).
Might want to occur to you sometime that "pimpin" is a horrible, abusive, and misogynistic word, and should never be used in a positive light. I ain't tryin' to cancel ... I just want you to be as good as you think you are. Women are awesome. Pimpin is the very definition of forcing women to conform to our ideals, at whatever price we (as men) decide. It's indefensible.
Another outstanding runthrough, thanks so much for doing these videos. Really enjoying them all.
OMG, when I saw the raise at the flop, I was thinking "easy fold", when I saw the bet on the turn, I was thinking "easy fold" and of course when I saw the small bet on the river, I was thinking of course "easy fold". And that's why I'm not a pro player like Daniel. Excelent hand breakdown, thanks!
Don't fall for the WHATsAPP and TEXT ME ON TELEGRAM scams! These people are criminals!
Every advanced bluff only works v players who see it’s possibility. Just like when less capable players check call then bet/shove river when the front door draw comes…they’re not bluffing so you have to fold top 2 or sets rather than think “of course I’d bluff this river given texture/action” cause they don’t see the bluff spots or understand the logic behind them.
🎯 Your point isn’t talked about enough. I’ll add, while there’s value in “gto strategy”, live poker is and has always been a social game. Find a way to beat the opponent/table that you’re at, at that time.
Dewey Tomko has been a poker pro for 4 decades and is still playing. He’s made millions. His approach has been to play to the table. Be flexible.
Exploitation is what’s made Phil Ivey arguably the best player in the world. He’s never once studied a gto chart or solver etc. Gto cultists fail to understand that trying to play like a robot will kill the game.
The poker boom of the early-mid 00’s would’ve never happened if the players were like how so many are today. Even the commentator in this video (Nick?) is like a wet blanket. No chance the average person who comes across a poker video/show with him commentating is going to be drawn in like they all were with Mike Sexton, Vince van Patton, Gabe Kaplin, etc.
@@chevelle1 definitely agree with what you’re saying, but phil Ivey in recent years has looked at gto charts. He’s still extremely exploitative which is why he’s the greatest of all time (even though today he probably would get eaten alive at super high rollers) but he’s had to adapt at least a little bit to become more balanced with his ranges
@@chevelle1 phil ivey is playing high rollers vs the gto crushers. If you don’t think he is memorizing charts and running sims you’re insane.
@@chevelle1 you know what else I’ve noticed that seems lost in todays poker “teachings/concepts” is a very basic yet arguably the most valuable “read” is simple logic behind bet sizing purpose. Obviously balance is critical but seems too often the simple “If bet is for value, what does my hand look like as played to the river for villain to bet ‘polar’ and actually get called?” After all value bets are primarily intended for value. Maybe I’m completely wrong but by river the range should be highly defined and too often the sizing simply makes no sense for value yet…many GTO players over fold.
@@chevelle1 love that
This is a great example of a thought process from a good thinking player when playing against another good thinking player. Against inexperienced players, a bluff on that river doesnt just get called, it either gets snap-called or shoved on by someone who is thinking about Vegas and the bleeping Mirage and thinks they have the nuts. But against a good player that really thinks about what bets mean, it actually makes sense. I love how Daniel also thinks even deeper than that though with table momentum and whatnot even though hed still have a healthy stack if the bluff didnt work, really fascinating all around.
These breakdowns actually will help a lot of poker players get better
The last 4 minutes of this masterclass are invaluable to any player.
Thanks so much @Daniel for sharing this with us.
Man the last little bit about spots, is spot on :p but yeah knowing the lines to your spots and which lines you took look like they can lead to different spots you can represent I think is one of the best advices I've heard out of the high-roller series. Dnegs
From "Kid Poker" to "Old Man D Negs".
😂 Fun to watch over the years.
Don't fall for the TEXT ME ON TELEGRAM scam. This is a fraud!
This series is pimpin. You should extend it to other tournaments
Don't fall for the WHATsAPP and TEXT ME ON TELEGRAM scams! These people are criminals!
When I first started poker Daniel you were my hero I learned so much form just watching you own people's souls and many years later I am still learning a lot from you Thank You
Don't fall for the WHATsAPP and TEXT ME ON TELEGRAM scams! These people are criminals!
"Ultimately, I just went with my instincts here, and 'something else '."
Hehe...sneaky, sneaky, Daniel!
His wife was probably there, so, he couldn't say!😂
Don't fall for the TEXT ME ON TELEGRAM scam. This is a fraud!
Absolutely love these breakdowns
Don't fall for the TEXT ME ON TELEGRAM scam. This is a fraud!
Daniel: *knows he has air and makes the lay down*
Also Daniel: But what if 😳
Don't fall for the WHATsAPP and TEXT ME ON TELEGRAM scams! These people are criminals!
Nick is a great player. World class. That said DNegs one of the GOATs
Love the Conor McGregor look!!!
1 combo of 22, 1 combo of TT, 6 combos of QT, 3 combos of QQ. He has a T so he can rule out 4 of those combinations. That means he would fear only 7 total hand combinations... all of which make sense as played. However, suited club connectors, gappers, and AXc would have all played this hand the same (I'm not removing AKs AQs because you've shown that you protect your limping range by also limping big hands ALTHOUGH I suspect you are more likely to raise with AKs AQs than AA for the fold equity.) So I count 26 hands you might turn into bluffs here vs. 4 actual winners. Even if we subtract all the Aces (to allow him to have Ac to block our bluffs) there's still 16. Not to mention that all AA KK QQ JJ might have played the hand the same.
I think the bet would have gotten called very quickly.
EDITED: Typed 4 twice instead of 11-4=7. Thank you Yun S!
With a 10 removal, combos he’d lose to are 1 22, 3 Q10, 3 QQ, so there are 7 combos.
Would love to see a breakdown of the hand where you tried to bluff Freddie Deeb in HSP season 1, Ep. 8. Interesting hand to me.
Don't be duped by the WHATsAPP scam! This scammer is impersonating the owner of this TH-cam channel.
I have to say, Negreanu is my all-time favorite player. I never thought I'd like watching poker as an adult, but it's surprisingly fun. Him and just a handful of other players. When I found out he had a coach, I think like a lot of people, I automatically assumed that the coach was better, and it kind of changed my perspective on the world of poker. We fans with no knowledge of how poker really works (i.e. the world of poker) see all these TH-cam videos and just kind of assume that the Phil-Ivey types are just the best there's ever been. That, the game has evolved and is now a completely different beast than it was even 20 years ago. But, then, when I saw he had a coach and was playing against him publicly at some point, I think like a lot of people who don't know any better, my assumption was that he must therefore be better than Daniel. One has to wonder though: as good as he likely is and as much as he understands about the theory and so on and so forth, if he were really so great, then why isn't he a millionaire and why isn't he famous for his skills? There could be other factors (family, came to the game late, has always preferred the theory side of things) but if there's this hidden world of coaches that are better than the Negreanus and Iveys of the world, then where are they all hiding?
Em todos os esportes, o coach nunca é melhor que o atleta cara
Those who can't do, teach
Interesting spot. Raise is interesting option on the river. You're going to have 11 pure value combos so for a pot sized raise you'll need like 5/6 bluffs. Question is if you can find 5 better bluffs than A3. For example, do 99,88, 77 without a club work well as bluffs. I feel they probably should but they also have slightly more showdown than A3 which could chop with Ax of clubs once in a blue moon. Also what are you doing with Like AA KK JJ. They're probably the wrong bluffs imo as A10,K10, J10 might all be in Nicks 3-bet range sometimes. I'm quite unsure what the best bluffs would be here as Nick literally has all his 10s. I'm thinking probably an A isn't the worse card to bluff with given that pocket pairs without a club can probably call slightly more than Ax given that Petrangelo takes this line with Ax of clubs. Also not sure if Nick would 3-bet A10 more or less than like K10 or J10. Definitely a spot where I could see a raise being the correct play although a fold makes by far the most sense as getting Nick to lay down a 10 seems slightly optimistic
This hand seems similar to the hand where you folded 99 against patrick antonius' 55. There was 2 10's and a queen on the river in that hand too
Antonius turning 55 into a bluff was next level genius.
just sent this video to my buddy in our home poker game...may cost me some money, but he's a friend :)
When Daniel says the word “aggressive” without using his Teddy KGB accent, it hurts my soul just a little bit.
Don't fall for the WHATsAPP and TEXT ME ON TELEGRAM scams! These people are criminals!
Nice fold DN.
You the man.
Would be very interested in hearing the perspective of the other player here. EG Daniel speaking his point and then hearing what Nicky P was thinking too.
Don't fall for the TEXT ME ON TELEGRAM scam. This is a fraud!
What an outstanding lesson. I think you may have gave too much. Thankyou
Don't fall for the TEXT ME ON TELEGRAM scam. This is a fraud!
Don't fall for the WHATsAPP scam. This is a fraud!
Such a great complex game.
Very instructive video.
Every time I run a big bluff the donks call
stop bluffing low stakes calling stations
This means you are the donk
U have to know who to bluff and when
I bluffed flush on board the good players folded the new guy called me with 2 pairs
17:39
I wonder what the ideal bluffing combo is (for humans I assume solvers have a million partials). I'm thinking it might be AcQx because a Q isn't that different from A high in terms of bluff catching but is a very relevant blocker. That also gives you 7 value hands and 3 bluffs so a 600K (ICM probably changes this number a bit) bluff makes them indifferent between calling or folding a T.
Normally you don't want to block auto folds in clubs but given that if you aren't bluffing AQ you should be calling with it I assume it is different here.
Don't fall for the TEXT ME ON TELEGRAM scam. This is a fraud!
Also on the potential call on the river, does it not stand that the river bet would be 1/2 pot if he holds 2 clubs only? 110k screams of "I want to be called". That said, I appreciate if you did push 400 in, as you said, he would really be in a spot.
Loving the content
I wonder if Nick has a tell here. Daniel looks like he’s going to fold and Nick changes his action by grabbing some chips.
Thank you!
Don't fall for the TEXT ME ON TELEGRAM scam. This is a fraud!
Don't fall for the WHATsAPP scam. This is a fraud!
Great video!
look how hard Petrangelo was breathing during the hand.
Don't fall for the TEXT ME ON TELEGRAM scam. This is a fraud!
I got so excited thinking Daniel responded to me but it was just a spam bot :(
Speaking of Daniel, when will you do a live stream next Daniel?
thx for making the player pool softer , all though most will realise that your limp was not effective at all
Bravo!...good chit!!!
Good show, thanks.
Poker tournaments are a tough game, you have to pick some spots and raise and C-bet and bluff or fold good hands pre and post/ turn and river or get best value to accumulate chips. Folding and farming good hands and getting value out of marginal hands against ppl using wider ranges ie fish, like Daniel lol. .
Don't fall for the TEXT ME ON TELEGRAM scam. This is a fraud!
Don't fall for the WHATsAPP scam. This is a fraud!
I was just in a spot like this and buddy over bet jammed 10x + on a low double paired board. I got tempted and called for my tournament life with low suited ace. This made me feel slightly better than a huge donkey 😂
I guess because you didn't tell the final story I don't need to ask how it panned out.
Lol when I see the Q i had the same bet size popping up in my head. But I think would only do it in a cash game, tournament, nah.
Could be value raising with quad dueces also
The chances of that are so miniscule that it's not even worth mentioning.
18:41 - What is the song please?
Don't fall for the TEXT ME ON TELEGRAM scam. This is a fraud!
I can't let playing 44 here go unchallenged, given the situation especially, into 2 players repping strength, and you state not much help for 44 coming on the turn, why would you think you might be able to bluff off potentially 2 players with trip 10? Play for me is to always fold there without thinking
Daniel should do a video of the odds that he mentions Matt in a negative light
Don't fall for the TEXT ME ON TELEGRAM scam. This is a fraud!
That decent image for bluffing isn't gonna last that long if you keep doing these videos Daniel, haha 😄
Maybe he wants to get called more often when he has it. Just a thought.
Don't fall for the TEXT ME ON TELEGRAM scam. This is a fraud!
@@dawid3k
Agree, he knows exactly what he is doing.
Its some good advice* 😊
I wonder if you can just put your whole stack of time bank cards in there and pull back what's left instead of worrying about being at 10 seconds over and over while you're tanking?
I check-shoved a river once as a bluff on a double paired board where I had AK with no pair. So the board was something like what it was here, TT225. It was in a $1,100 tournament, but my opponent was a good player. I thought he was pure bluffing. He wasn’t. He folded the 2 (or whatever it was in that hand) for the lower possible full house. He asked me the next day what I had and I told him. I don’t think he was happy. I don’t think there are many players in $1,100 tournaments who are capable of folding a full house, but luckily for me, he was a good, thinking player.
Don't fall for the TEXT ME ON TELEGRAM scam. This is a fraud!
He gave you a few spots to spew with those bet sizes. I don’t think he gives you credit for better if you didn’t take the cheese on the turn. I think he snaps a river raise. Would love to hear what Nick was thinking after betting your A high to call how he would play his hand to a raise. I just feel like theoretically off these stacks you never let that go to anything. I don’t think he would give you QQ on a button limp bc how weird it would play post and he has Tx massively blocked. It just doesn’t feel like a good story.
Don't fall for the WHATsAPP and TEXT ME ON TELEGRAM scams! These people are criminals!
Raise or fold
I'm confused how pocket 2's you or he could have never entered your mind!!......I think a play at trying to get him to fold could only work with an all in......and that still not really feasible in my opinion
13:50 QQ limping on the button?
Q 10 would have river jammed
Don't fall for the WHATsAPP scam. This is a fraud!
I think you should definitely raise here more often than not. Your reasoning makes sense Daniel, but you didn’t consider the fact that you under-repped top set so when you raise, you’re only polarized to 89 here because I don’t think 55’s could even raise here. I’m sure Nicky could have large range of hands that he still pays you off with like TT, KK, AA, QJ, QT, etc. I honestly believe a raise here would be a great line solely because you under repped JJ. Counter argument?
I think your comment is on the wrong video buddy. This is not the hand where anyone had top set.
If he had checked the river would you have checked back?
Is it just me or is Daniel blinking like he is an AI computing every outcome
Lose to 22 ;) that would have been a sick hand if you had because it may have played out the same exact way,...post flop, but likely you would have raised it up pre so maybe 22 could be discounted from your hand.
Daniel, 22 is in your range as well…
Don't fall for the TEXT ME ON TELEGRAM scam. This is a fraud!
Don't fall for the WHATsAPP scam. This is a fraud!
To be honest I don't think a raise would have worked, at least not against me. Nick holding a 10, means he knows you can't have pocket 10s, so only QT and ducks are beating you. What are the odds you haveing the case 10 and one of three queens or the two missing 2s, exactly 4 out of 2,598,960 possible starting hands. A little thin.. if Nick had a 2 instead, a raise would have worked for sure. Do you agree?
I’m just a complete fish(obviously) but are there really 2598960 starting hands? I thought the figure was nearer 1400 which is considerably less but hey what do I know:))
@@julianhodgson1961 Ops me too, your totally right, mixed that up with possible combinations after the river consisting of 5 cards 😅
And I forgot to consider pocket Queens as well. So 7 out of 1326 it is!
math is hard... 😉
Don't fall for the WHATsAPP and TEXT ME ON TELEGRAM scams! These people are criminals!
DN got me confused. He's both saying that if he's making a raise of that modest size, he's never bluffing. At the same time, the thought of bluffing crossed his mind and he didn't mention any other bet size. Is NP folding this full house to a 660k raise even 1 % of the time, with that stack? Lol. I dunno, I feel like Daniel wanted to talk about a less talked about topic here but the hand he chose wasn't that good to illustrate the point.
I think if he wants to bluff effectively here, it has to be some sort of overbet on the river.
15:05 except you do have a club
Surprised at the physical tell by Petrangelo there. Very heavy breathing, often associated with big hand.
🎉🎉
You forgot to mention 22
I don't think he's ever folding there DNegs.
Don't fall for the WHATsAPP scam. This is a fraud!
Damn orphan flops when you have ace high
Don't fall for the TEXT ME ON TELEGRAM scam. This is a fraud!
Not sure why you'd bet on that flop in the first place? You're not getting called by K-high/Q-high and not folding out made hands/flush draws.
It's an easy flop bet. He forced Bonomo off a much better hand than him and he's also betting for protection and to just take the pot down here. If the blinds have two random hands that have nothing, say 98os and 76os, he's letting those hands outdraw him for free and potentially even bluff him off his ace high on future streets. If you aren't betting flop here you hate money and just don't understand poker.
Kid Poker ----> Old Man Dnegs 😅
He would of snap called for 660 maybe not a shove
If it's Allen, just fold 😂😅
I don't understand, Why give us this lecture with an example where he didn't actually do it? Isn't it better to show us one where he actually did..? 😹😹
Don't fall for the TEXT ME ON TELEGRAM scam. This is a fraud!
Switch the screens. You on the small one and the hand/action on the big one. Can't see shiite.
Daniel nu stiu daca vezi mesaju desi mi-as dori din suflet sa il citesti , am o dorinta cat mai traiesc imi poti face cadou un buldoexcavator te rog , sa il tin ca amintire , te urmaresc cu drag
“I don’t have a club.” False.
Don't fall for the TEXT ME ON TELEGRAM scam. This is a fraud!
Honestly why do you still live in Vegas so many nice place to live ?
Poker
Do you know anything about Vegas and where he lives it’s absolutely beautiful.
The Ontario government just blocked Canadians from playing with other people from outside the province. The regular brick and mortar casinos were losing too much revenue ( to online poker ), so it's Black Friday in Ontario and probably every other province in Canada. If you play Poker professionally then people move to Vegas or Asia ( Thailand / Hong Kong etc. ).
A weak player is someone who doesn't know how to bluff.
Don't fall for the TEXT ME ON TELEGRAM scam. This is a fraud!
Bonomo still trying to a teenager. Weirdest cat i am glad I don't know.
Awful flop bet
Daniel accept Nik airballs 100k heads up challenge he will be in Vegas all month long
Don't fall for the TEXT ME ON TELEGRAM scam. This is a fraud!
Sam farha said you are a fake millionaire daniel.
Don't fall for the TEXT ME ON TELEGRAM scam. This is a fraud!
Study long
Study wrong
Don't fall for the TEXT ME ON TELEGRAM scam. This is a fraud!
First
u suck
Second
Might want to occur to you sometime that "pimpin" is a horrible, abusive, and misogynistic word, and should never be used in a positive light. I ain't tryin' to cancel ... I just want you to be as good as you think you are. Women are awesome. Pimpin is the very definition of forcing women to conform to our ideals, at whatever price we (as men) decide. It's indefensible.
terrible read and is the BB 100% GOTS A 10
God bless president Trump!
Don't fall for the TEXT ME ON TELEGRAM scam. This is a fraud!
1 of the best just annoying to listen 2
Don't fall for the WHATsAPP scam. This is a fraud!