I have the gitzo adventure 45l bag and basically use it as a storage bag and use a mountain warehouse 40ltr walking rucksack as my camera bag of choice due to the comfort and design and it was almost £300 cheaper but still fits my 500mm f4 mk2 lens and R6 mk2 plus clothing and food / drink etc
Was going to say early on in the video but waited until the end as you did exactly what I was going to suggest anyway. 1. Get a bag you like. 2. Stick a camera cube in it. The other benefit is that it can also be used a 'normal' bag when you're not carting cameras around. Family day out for example - camera and one lens hanging from my capture clip on the strap - whilst the rest of the bag can deal with AOB (mainly kid related detritus/snacks, coats etc).
Nice video on an great topic... 1. None of the bags designed by photographers, even though few companies may claim 2. Every manufacturer has made bags that serves few use cases but not all 3. Every bag is designed in such way that photographer would buy new bags all the time 4. Ergonomics is a big pain in each bag 5. Most importantly, bag exclusively designed for camera and photographers make them eligible to "sell it on the much higher price" 6. Business runs on the repeat customers, if you give the permanent solution, customer wont return to you for ever... bad idea 7. No company works on quick and easy access to camera and its gear/accessories
Not for landscape photography, but I carry my gear in a (false) leather shoulder bag (like in the "good old days") with removable foam inserts. I found the almost perfect bag, a bit too big, but lightweight and "classy". No brand, no distinctive signs, and at a ridiculously low price... So I completely agree with your advice !!
I use a Deuter Freerider with a Tenba DYOB DSLR Insert. This backpack is designed for ski touring and has a fully rear zipped compartment. So I don't have any problem laying the pack on the muddy, wet ground. I've used Deuter backpacks whilst hiking for many years and appreciate their quality and comfort. I did also both use a Kata and a Tamrac in earlier days, but both were uncomfortable and I definitely they sucked compared with a hiking backpack.
I understand the idea of an unmarked bag. I do the same thing with the headcovers on my golf driver. Why tempt a thief? However, hanging your tripod on the side of the bag defeats that incognito effort. Any thoughts?
Yup, good call. I made the move to a well known backpack brand, 40 and a 20L both with rain covers (logo is very subtle) some months ago and have no plans to go back to camera bags (of which I have two). I store my camera gear in neoprene pouches and pop them into my pack as required. This setup also leaves room for food and clothing, etc. something lacking in the smaller camera bags. I have even travelled internationally with this setup. Cheers and thanks for sharing.
This is the route I went with, instead getting a (used) Peak Design travel bag for travel (it's my new suitcase) and when I need to bring more gear (not hiking). I got an Osprey bag for hiking with. I like your Gregory bag, but I wanted something smaller than 40L for day hikes and ended up with an Osprey Manta that I stuck a small, top-loading camera cube in - it holds two lenses or one lens and a bag of accessories. I only take one body with me when hiking and it stays on my capture clip unless the rain comes down, and then I can shove it in the main pocket of my bag sitting on top of the cube. I would be nice to put together a comprehensive list of hiking bags that support camera cubes. Some hiking bags are better for this than others.
Good take, sir. I use a regular backpack, even without the cube insert thingie, just the soft bag-like cases my lens came with. This allows me to pack a 12-100 for landscape and 300 for wildlife (m43 user here), and still have plenty of room left over for other stuff. I can even throw in a prime or two into the backpack pockets if I want to take an outdoor portrait.
I used to do event photography, and it ended mostly at night. I used a bike to travel, hiking bag was a must for me for sweat. It also protected me from muggers. As an added benefit, I could insert my tripods in the bagpack as well.
I've been doing this for awhile and totally agree. I did start as more of a hiker/backpacker that transitioned into photography. Coming from that world all of the dedicated camera bags seemed so impractical that I never even considered them. They just aren't made for people who are actually putting in miles and require comfort and reliability over aesthetic. Great video!
I've been thinking about doing the same with my wildlife set up, just need to find a decent hiking bag that will do the same as your set up for a 150-600lense with body
I have had a Vaude 34ltr Hiking pack for around 5 years and I like the fact that i only need one pack. I used 2 Peak Design inserts which, obviously can be removed if it's a non-photography trip. It's lightweight and very comfortable with an excellent internal frame with mesh back support. I used to have a LowePro bag many years ago, but it was so uncomfortalbe after a full days use. So i stopped using it after about 2 months.
Absolutely amazing video. I'm surprised you don't get more views considering the quality of the content. Ive been planning to go out to Gettysburg next spring to go backpacking. This video completely changed my mind. I was going to bring a special hip bag for my camera gear. But i think a dedicated cube in my hiking pack will suit me much better. Thanks a lot!
Great video. Personally, I got so fed up with camera rucksacks that I switched to a should bag, a Tamrac Pro 12 which can carry so much and is so accessible. I can lengthen the strap so that I can (sort of) wear it across my back when it's dry. I have gotten so fed up with traditional backpacks. One in particular is so difficult to get to my gear that I often think about throwing it out. These bags are not only used , funnily enough, as straightforward back packs when hiking, minus the inserts. The smallest is cabin luggage on aeroplanes.
CAMPAGNON ... German made one - it's the best backpack you'll ever own. 100% waterproof properly designed and just a great backpack. This particular company is great to deal with and honestly guys and girls. If you are looking for a proper backpack something that's properly designed and made out of materials that are actually going to last a lifetime. Then this is the bag honestly I searched high and low I saw the video from the Iceland guy and I contacted the company directly and they answered all of my questions. The bag is called the elements.
There are good camera back packs in the market with a proper waist belt and aluminum frame to distribute loads like the F-Stop mountain series, some Shimoda and the Nya-Evo but non is made for long distance walking and they can never compete with a proper hiking backpack. On the other hand, no proper hiking backpack can compete with a well designed camera backpack. The perfect bag doesn’t exist.
I used to use a brand name camera bag slung over my shoulder and/or across my body. I liked that it had a solid molded flat base / bottom so I could put it down. It also had an internal 'sling' for the camera. But it was so cumbersome. Falling off or digging into my neck. No more! I now have 1. No brand Snoot bag on its own waist belt. Like a bum bag / fanny pack. Snoot on my hip. Has my RP + RF 24-240. Cost about $AUD25 online. (Make sure the bag is deep enough for whatever lens!) Under 2kg 2. No brand Small back pack with divisions. Lightweight on my back out of the way. Has my R50 + RF 100-400. Plus flash, spare batteries, etc. Cost about $AUD30 online. Under 4kg Far more comfortable and more convenient. Weight is distributed instead of 5 - 6kg on the back. Back pack has a small contact area. Easy to mange as hand luggage on a plane - including inside one very lightweight larger backpack. Can go in locker OR under seat in front! I tried a snoot bag on my trouser belt. Nup - no good. Own waist belt far better.
I use a black unremarkable skate backpack. Has enough room to keep my camera kit and enormous laptop safe around town. It's reinforced and comfortable for all day heavy loads at festivals. Plus I can carry a tripod, lightstand, or extra kit in the exterior board straps.
I can fully agree with you but also I dont agree that camera bags suck :) 1. Yeah most of the bags are flat at the back, but I hate the ones that are not a always like to have backpack close to my back I hate hiking backpack yeah I get wet on the back but I have so many layers on me that it doesnt come out Im nice and soggy in the inside and I like that :D seems to be weird but I completly have nothing against being totally wet and stinky Im on the hike not on the fashion walk :D and I dont like beeing cold Im sick even in 10deg C so I dress i 4-5 shirts, 2 termo pants tick jeans on it some warm hoodie sometimes even 2 hats and moisture dont come out :) 2. I have vanguard veo bag and I take it everywhere 90% of time its without dividers and I take it to the shopping newet got it wet inside trough the zipper but also I dont use jackets that water slide on I usually have my wool jacket on my and never had the problem So I would say not everybody agree that photobags are bad because not everybody likes hiking gear ;) I was hiking all my life with my school bag I was always like: not having gear is an excuse for not going out :) But I can agree on one thing the prices of camera bags is ridiculous :) So for me the answer what is the best is the same for any question on earth: "It depends" xD
Actually my vanguard sky (something or other) has pads on the shoulder blades, and lower back to allow airflow and works really well. But yeah was fairly expensive.
Rain covers aren't great for exactly the reasons you listed - they don't protect your back area and can actually retain water at the bottom; it's become standard practice to use a trash compactor bag for anything you need to keep dry instead of using a rain cover (in the backpacking community). The one thing those camera backpacks do really well is keep the heavy camera gear properly located while maintaining reasonably quick access; to do the same with a cube would require unpacking most of your bag just to grab a different lens. I think the best solution is most likely a camera capture clip to hold your camera on a shoulder strap and then another smaller waist/chest bag for an extra lens and batteries/wipes/etc..., for longer trips at least. The camera backpack are really best suited for day hikes, maybe an overnight but I wouldn't push it much beyond that. That backpack with the rotating thing is interesting but I'm not dropping $300+ on a maybe.
I got a fairly cheap camera bag off of Amazon and I have no issues with it. It's a bit heavy with all the gear and the tripod but it's super convenient and the rain cover is great when it is needed. You should be using lens caps both for the rear and front anyhow. Most lenses and modern cameras are designed with weather-resistance so worrying about a little bit of water is just ridiculous.
Fair comments I agree with everything you said I do wish they would make them a bit smaller than a full bag like yours for like a day bag thank you for the heads up 😊👍🏻
I just do day trips and only carry 1 camera with 1 lens attached so I do use a regular backpack. I used to stuff the backpack with towels for bottom protection but now I just insert the small Canon camera bag I have into the backpack since its bottom is protective. Sure it takes longer to unzip the bag and then get my camera out of the Canon bag but I'm not advertising to muggers and I am really in no hurry. The backpack is waterproof and my camera is inside an inner camera bag so everything is protected.
Quick anecdote to you mentioning somebody smashing a window, especially because I see it far too often: *NEVER* keep expensive things in the back seat, *ALWAYS* put your valuables in the trunk.
I'm very happy with a fishing backpack I found on ebay uk from a smaller manufacturer with a large center compartment to easily drop down my large camera with telephoto lens on. Can even fit a tripod into the same area with the big camera setup if fiddle around a bit. Sturdy essentially waterproof oxford , waterproof rubber section at the bottom, square in shape so it can stand on its' own if put it down on the ground, and very comfortable back paddings and straps. Plus 2 large side cointainers and regular front pockets etc. It was just a fraction of what I see these other flimsy bags go for. Just above 100 pounds or so. Maybe something to consider? Cheers all.
Camera backpacks seem to have got worse over the years. I still have a lowepro mini Trekker (20 odd years old) which unzips from the front like yours and doesn't scream camera bag from the outside.
Soooo, my landscape is extremely boring to shoot. I will say, though, that I looked at camera bags for weeks before I just gave up. I have been on many a hike while in the Marines and I have a good idea what makes a good bag and it just isn’t available in camera bags. Where’s the dedicated spot for my camelpack? Where can I stow snacks? I will probably want a place for clean, dry socks. I can’t put any of that in a camera backpack that only has enough room for my camera and two lenses.
@@Photography-Explained I use either one of my laptop-bags w/ logo color the same as the bag which is black. I still have some shoulder bags which I used all the time but not for a while. The one w/ a zipped bottom was good for a dozen rolls of film & filters. With digital, I still have to figure out what to fill the bottom to hold up the top. Besides batteries, mostly no need for food, how about ice packs to cool the cameras? As w/ small bags w/ camera logos I always wear them logo facing body or else remove it or black-paint over it.
I have an evoc backpack for years now and no problems at all. Not super fancy but developed by skiers and adventure guys from Germany famous for their protection backpacks. It's nice for mountain tours skiing and so on cause it was developed for that by people who are really doing that themselves 😂
I have the gitzo adventure 45l bag and basically use it as a storage bag and use a mountain warehouse 40ltr walking rucksack as my camera bag of choice due to the comfort and design and it was almost £300 cheaper but still fits my 500mm f4 mk2 lens and R6 mk2 plus clothing and food / drink etc
Was going to say early on in the video but waited until the end as you did exactly what I was going to suggest anyway.
1. Get a bag you like.
2. Stick a camera cube in it.
The other benefit is that it can also be used a 'normal' bag when you're not carting cameras around. Family day out for example - camera and one lens hanging from my capture clip on the strap - whilst the rest of the bag can deal with AOB (mainly kid related detritus/snacks, coats etc).
That's the simplest thing to do.
Nice video on an great topic...
1. None of the bags designed by photographers, even though few companies may claim
2. Every manufacturer has made bags that serves few use cases but not all
3. Every bag is designed in such way that photographer would buy new bags all the time
4. Ergonomics is a big pain in each bag
5. Most importantly, bag exclusively designed for camera and photographers make them eligible to "sell it on the much higher price"
6. Business runs on the repeat customers, if you give the permanent solution, customer wont return to you for ever... bad idea
7. No company works on quick and easy access to camera and its gear/accessories
Not for landscape photography, but I carry my gear in a (false) leather shoulder bag (like in the "good old days") with removable foam inserts. I found the almost perfect bag, a bit too big, but lightweight and "classy". No brand, no distinctive signs, and at a ridiculously low price... So I completely agree with your advice !!
Nice! That sounds like a perfect "in the streets" set up.
Sehr Gut, dein System ist sicherlich sehr praktisch✅ Das ist auch meine Linie; nur welche Firma stellt Deine Tasche her ❔
I use a Deuter Freerider with a Tenba DYOB DSLR Insert. This backpack is designed for ski touring and has a fully rear zipped compartment. So I don't have any problem laying the pack on the muddy, wet ground. I've used Deuter backpacks whilst hiking for many years and appreciate their quality and comfort. I did also both use a Kata and a Tamrac in earlier days, but both were uncomfortable and I definitely they sucked compared with a hiking backpack.
I understand the idea of an unmarked bag. I do the same thing with the headcovers on my golf driver. Why tempt a thief? However, hanging your tripod on the side of the bag defeats that incognito effort. Any thoughts?
Stick the rain cover over it.
Yup, good call. I made the move to a well known backpack brand, 40 and a 20L both with rain covers (logo is very subtle) some months ago and have no plans to go back to camera bags (of which I have two). I store my camera gear in neoprene pouches and pop them into my pack as required. This setup also leaves room for food and clothing, etc. something lacking in the smaller camera bags. I have even travelled internationally with this setup. Cheers and thanks for sharing.
Glad I'm on the right tracks with my own thoughts. Appreciate the comment Dana!
This is the route I went with, instead getting a (used) Peak Design travel bag for travel (it's my new suitcase) and when I need to bring more gear (not hiking). I got an Osprey bag for hiking with. I like your Gregory bag, but I wanted something smaller than 40L for day hikes and ended up with an Osprey Manta that I stuck a small, top-loading camera cube in - it holds two lenses or one lens and a bag of accessories. I only take one body with me when hiking and it stays on my capture clip unless the rain comes down, and then I can shove it in the main pocket of my bag sitting on top of the cube.
I would be nice to put together a comprehensive list of hiking bags that support camera cubes. Some hiking bags are better for this than others.
Good take, sir. I use a regular backpack, even without the cube insert thingie, just the soft bag-like cases my lens came with. This allows me to pack a 12-100 for landscape and 300 for wildlife (m43 user here), and still have plenty of room left over for other stuff. I can even throw in a prime or two into the backpack pockets if I want to take an outdoor portrait.
I used to do event photography, and it ended mostly at night. I used a bike to travel, hiking bag was a must for me for sweat. It also protected me from muggers. As an added benefit, I could insert my tripods in the bagpack as well.
I just got a Bagsmart bag and love it. I do admit that most camera bags are annoying.
I've been doing this for awhile and totally agree. I did start as more of a hiker/backpacker that transitioned into photography. Coming from that world all of the dedicated camera bags seemed so impractical that I never even considered them. They just aren't made for people who are actually putting in miles and require comfort and reliability over aesthetic. Great video!
I use a Kelty day pack. To keep stuff dry dont rely on the bag itself. Use either a purpose built waterproof sack or a black heavy duty trash bag.
I've been thinking about doing the same with my wildlife set up, just need to find a decent hiking bag that will do the same as your set up for a 150-600lense with body
I have had a Vaude 34ltr Hiking pack for around 5 years and I like the fact that i only need one pack. I used 2 Peak Design inserts which, obviously can be removed if it's a non-photography trip. It's lightweight and very comfortable with an excellent internal frame with mesh back support. I used to have a LowePro bag many years ago, but it was so uncomfortalbe after a full days use. So i stopped using it after about 2 months.
Absolutely amazing video. I'm surprised you don't get more views considering the quality of the content. Ive been planning to go out to Gettysburg next spring to go backpacking. This video completely changed my mind. I was going to bring a special hip bag for my camera gear. But i think a dedicated cube in my hiking pack will suit me much better. Thanks a lot!
What happens if you can't find a muddy patch to drop your bag in?
Great video. Personally, I got so fed up with camera rucksacks that I switched to a should bag, a Tamrac Pro 12 which can carry so much and is so accessible. I can lengthen the strap so that I can (sort of) wear it across my back when it's dry. I have gotten so fed up with traditional backpacks. One in particular is so difficult to get to my gear that I often think about throwing it out. These bags are not only used , funnily enough, as straightforward back packs when hiking, minus the inserts. The smallest is cabin luggage on aeroplanes.
CAMPAGNON ... German made one - it's the best backpack you'll ever own. 100% waterproof properly designed and just a great backpack. This particular company is great to deal with and honestly guys and girls. If you are looking for a proper backpack something that's properly designed and made out of materials that are actually going to last a lifetime. Then this is the bag honestly I searched high and low I saw the video from the Iceland guy and I contacted the company directly and they answered all of my questions. The bag is called the elements.
A bit flipping pricey!!!!!
There are good camera back packs in the market with a proper waist belt and aluminum frame to distribute loads like the F-Stop mountain series, some Shimoda and the Nya-Evo but non is made for long distance walking and they can never compete with a proper hiking backpack. On the other hand, no proper hiking backpack can compete with a well designed camera backpack. The perfect bag doesn’t exist.
I always watch your videos and I must say that your videos are great, keep up the good work❤
Cheers man! I just shared your comment with the team :)
@@Photography-Explained just keep up the good work with your team and you all will be youtube famous in no time.
I used to use a brand name camera bag slung over my shoulder and/or across my body. I liked that it had a solid molded flat base / bottom so I could put it down. It also had an internal 'sling' for the camera. But it was so cumbersome. Falling off or digging into my neck. No more!
I now have
1. No brand Snoot bag on its own waist belt. Like a bum bag / fanny pack. Snoot on my hip. Has my RP + RF 24-240. Cost about $AUD25 online. (Make sure the bag is deep enough for whatever lens!) Under 2kg
2. No brand Small back pack with divisions. Lightweight on my back out of the way. Has my R50 + RF 100-400. Plus flash, spare batteries, etc. Cost about $AUD30 online. Under 4kg
Far more comfortable and more convenient. Weight is distributed instead of 5 - 6kg on the back. Back pack has a small contact area.
Easy to mange as hand luggage on a plane - including inside one very lightweight larger backpack. Can go in locker OR under seat in front!
I tried a snoot bag on my trouser belt. Nup - no good. Own waist belt far better.
Good hiking backpacks are pretty costly as well though.
Thank you so much
this is very educative
Glad you liked the video! Thanks for the comment :)
I use a black unremarkable skate backpack. Has enough room to keep my camera kit and enormous laptop safe around town. It's reinforced and comfortable for all day heavy loads at festivals. Plus I can carry a tripod, lightstand, or extra kit in the exterior board straps.
I can fully agree with you but also I dont agree that camera bags suck :)
1. Yeah most of the bags are flat at the back, but I hate the ones that are not a always like to have backpack close to my back I hate hiking backpack yeah I get wet on the back but I have so many layers on me that it doesnt come out Im nice and soggy in the inside and I like that :D seems to be weird but I completly have nothing against being totally wet and stinky Im on the hike not on the fashion walk :D and I dont like beeing cold Im sick even in 10deg C so I dress i 4-5 shirts, 2 termo pants tick jeans on it some warm hoodie sometimes even 2 hats and moisture dont come out :)
2. I have vanguard veo bag and I take it everywhere 90% of time its without dividers and I take it to the shopping newet got it wet inside trough the zipper but also I dont use jackets that water slide on I usually have my wool jacket on my and never had the problem
So I would say not everybody agree that photobags are bad because not everybody likes hiking gear ;)
I was hiking all my life with my school bag I was always like: not having gear is an excuse for not going out :)
But I can agree on one thing the prices of camera bags is ridiculous :)
So for me the answer what is the best is the same for any question on earth: "It depends" xD
or in the inverse side (carrying only few gears), use the tiny Uniqlo sling bag if you plan using only small cameras and 1-2 small lenses
Actually my vanguard sky (something or other) has pads on the shoulder blades, and lower back to allow airflow and works really well. But yeah was fairly expensive.
Rain covers aren't great for exactly the reasons you listed - they don't protect your back area and can actually retain water at the bottom; it's become standard practice to use a trash compactor bag for anything you need to keep dry instead of using a rain cover (in the backpacking community).
The one thing those camera backpacks do really well is keep the heavy camera gear properly located while maintaining reasonably quick access; to do the same with a cube would require unpacking most of your bag just to grab a different lens.
I think the best solution is most likely a camera capture clip to hold your camera on a shoulder strap and then another smaller waist/chest bag for an extra lens and batteries/wipes/etc..., for longer trips at least. The camera backpack are really best suited for day hikes, maybe an overnight but I wouldn't push it much beyond that.
That backpack with the rotating thing is interesting but I'm not dropping $300+ on a maybe.
I got a fairly cheap camera bag off of Amazon and I have no issues with it. It's a bit heavy with all the gear and the tripod but it's super convenient and the rain cover is great when it is needed. You should be using lens caps both for the rear and front anyhow. Most lenses and modern cameras are designed with weather-resistance so worrying about a little bit of water is just ridiculous.
just get a tenba 10L. that was the endgame buy for me
I use a 30€ Amazon Basics Camera Bag. Works great if you carry 1 body and 2/3 lenses which is all I need when hiking.
Lay your pack cover on the ground first then your pack on top of that.
Pack covers can be easily stuffed into side pockets for quick access.
There is one bag with back frame...One Pro Flex from PGYTech
Olympus EM1-X user not worried about the elements
Fair comments I agree with everything you said I do wish they would make them a bit smaller than a full bag like yours for like a day bag thank you for the heads up 😊👍🏻
I just do day trips and only carry 1 camera with 1 lens attached so I do use a regular backpack. I used to stuff the backpack with towels for bottom protection but now I just insert the small Canon camera bag I have into the backpack since its bottom is protective. Sure it takes longer to unzip the bag and then get my camera out of the Canon bag but I'm not advertising to muggers and I am really in no hurry. The backpack is waterproof and my camera is inside an inner camera bag so everything is protected.
Quick anecdote to you mentioning somebody smashing a window, especially because I see it far too often: *NEVER* keep expensive things in the back seat, *ALWAYS* put your valuables in the trunk.
Good point, and nice with a different angle on the subject about camera bags. As you say, they are often so overpriced
Very interesting video, thank you.
Glad you enjoyed it
The LowePro RoverPro 35 has all the features of that backpack you recommend…
I'm very happy with a fishing backpack I found on ebay uk from a smaller manufacturer with a large center compartment to easily drop down my large camera with telephoto lens on. Can even fit a tripod into the same area with the big camera setup if fiddle around a bit. Sturdy essentially waterproof oxford , waterproof rubber section at the bottom, square in shape so it can stand on its' own if put it down on the ground, and very comfortable back paddings and straps. Plus 2 large side cointainers and regular front pockets etc. It was just a fraction of what I see these other flimsy bags go for. Just above 100 pounds or so. Maybe something to consider? Cheers all.
I have an F stop bag but switched to an Osprey 34 liter. Best move ever.
I do the same thing....good points
Camera backpacks seem to have got worse over the years. I still have a lowepro mini Trekker (20 odd years old) which unzips from the front like yours and doesn't scream camera bag from the outside.
Soooo, my landscape is extremely boring to shoot. I will say, though, that I looked at camera bags for weeks before I just gave up. I have been on many a hike while in the Marines and I have a good idea what makes a good bag and it just isn’t available in camera bags. Where’s the dedicated spot for my camelpack? Where can I stow snacks? I will probably want a place for clean, dry socks. I can’t put any of that in a camera backpack that only has enough room for my camera and two lenses.
Well carry shoulder bag with a small olympus m1 mark ii and only 2 lens
Nice!
I love your idea! 💡✨😀 Camera Cubes inside the proper hiking bag... Way more lighter setup, more weather resistant, and at a fraction of the cost.👍🏻
Add a tripod and they know what you carrying, just a thought.
What about fstop backpacks which facilitates this feature?
I would not leave any bag, even without a brands name in the car, except bags from Aldi or 7eleven.
.
Have you ever tried any of Shimoda’s backpacks?
Osprey backpack is what I use.
What about your 200-500 lens? no room for this!
My 100-400 fits in the top sideways.
If you have a tripon on the outside of your bag, everybody knows, what is inside😉
Lowepro valgono molto di piú di quello che costano....
Agree. But the bag is unbalanced. In cities your bag will maybe get opened accessible is on the back. But no bag is perfect . Thanks
Sure but I wouldn't be using a hiking style bag either way in the city.
@@Photography-Explained I use either one of my laptop-bags w/ logo color the same as the bag which is black. I still have some shoulder bags which I used all the time but not for a while. The one w/ a zipped bottom
was good for a dozen rolls of film & filters. With digital, I still have to figure out what to fill the bottom to hold up the top. Besides batteries, mostly no need for food, how about ice packs to cool the cameras? As w/ small bags w/ camera logos I always wear them logo facing body or else remove it or black-paint over it.
two bodies on the back.. ? really.. ?
Die KI-Übersetzung ist einfach nur schrecklich und nicht synchron.
I have an evoc backpack for years now and no problems at all. Not super fancy but developed by skiers and adventure guys from Germany famous for their protection backpacks. It's nice for mountain tours skiing and so on cause it was developed for that by people who are really doing that themselves 😂
I now use a cabin bag with wheels if going on a flight and stack a smaller backpack in my main luggage case.