Yes, you pronounced Argonauts correctly. We actually pronounce BMO as Bee-Moe, and BMO Field is actually expanding its capability for the World Cup because its currently capacity is not big enough per FIFA's requirements. It's current capacity is roughly 40,000 and it's being expanded to 45,000 for the World Cup. One of the images you used is a rendering of said expansion.
Chargers used to play in San Diego but moved to LA a few years ago like the rams from St. Louis. They even used to play in LA galaxy stadium before they built the sofi stadium.
Arrowhead is the loudest stadium in the world it will be rocking for the World Cup. Us KC soccer fans are looking forward to competent soccer in our city if we have 3 more years of Peter Vermes
I decided to start keeping a list back in 2015 of soccer games in NFL stadiums (and went back 10 years before that, so I have a list of every soccer game played in every NFL stadium that was built from 2005 onward). So here's the list of the ones that are World Cup venues for 2026. SoFi Stadium in LA - 71,189 average (1 game) AT&T Stadium in Arlington - 62,561 average (18 games) MetLife Stadium in East Rutherford - 59,234 average (27 games) Levi's Stadium in Santa Clara - 52,077 average (20 games) Mercedes-Benz Stadium in Atlanta - 49,346 average (106 games)
Cowboys Stadium is probably the best designed stadium in America. Pains me to admit that as a Giants fan but that place is beautiful. Ive always loved how Metlife has a view of the NYC skyline in the backdrop though. Gonna be so cool and very strange seeing all these iconic American football stadiums filled to the brim for the world cup Also Chargers moved to LA from san diego a few years back
Levi’s is in Santa Clara and the San Jose Earthquakes play there from time to time. Playing LAFC there this weekend (4/6/23) as an example. Usually when PayPal park is too small for the demand.
Gillette is located in Foxborough which is about an hour or so away from Boston. I have been to Gillette twice now myself and it is a beautiful stadium.
Yes Tac, do a video for every individual stadium… also can you state your opinion on which stadiums you think would be better for the World Cup or at least the ones you wish were included
Where the US Stadiums were concerned I often found it easier to remember that California and Texas both have 2 host cities. CA: LA & San Fran TX: Dallas & Houston Add in Seattle up in the North West USA and there you have 5 out of the 11. The remaining 6 includes: Boston, Philadelphia, New York City, Atlanta, Miami and Kansas City.
RaymondJames Stadium in Tampa, FL should also be considered. Home of the former Tampa Bay Mutiny MSL and we have hosted several big football games. Capacity is over 75,000 and is natural grass.
It'll be in Metlife Stadium. It was selected due to the immediate areas for huge fan zones to watch the game. It has the public transit to get fans around & the New York/New Jersey area also has tourist attractions for the fans to see/visit while they're there. But if you ask me, it's also likely due to the timezone Metlife Stadium is in, the Eastern US Timezone. Which is 5-6 hours behind European time. So, if Kick off was set for 3pm Eastern US time, it'll be 8-9pm European time. Which is the usual time for European games are played. For South America, the time zones are fairly close to Eastern US. And given that Europe & South America are the sport's biggest audiences, having the Final at Metlife Stadium would be best to get as many viewers as possible.
We The fans want to know more about the facility. Will it have a natural grass field for the World Cup. It should. What other dimensions of the stadium will be done. The removed seating will it stay or be returned to box seating levels. We would like to know.
According to FIFA regulations, the stadium hosting a final must have a seating minimum of 80,000. There's only 2 stadiums that have that capacity. AT & T stadium in Dallas and Met Life Stadium in New Jersey. Most likely the final will be held in NJ
Listen man FIFA is just Fuxk corruption its all driving by money, you don't needed 80,000 seat to host a world game, all don't see what they are doing lol.. bro use your brain fifa along with hosting country have gotten greedy yes greedy and money hungry, that any country can actually how the world cup right about now, all the needed is just 5 good stadiums that it brother so all this rule about regulations that they put in place the reason for those rule like I said its just greedy..
Of course it makes sense for FIFA to have the Final in NJ, why would they choose a stadium in Dallas over a venue close to the capital of the world, New York??
US Soccer HQ is in Chicago and they still did not make it into one of the 2026 World cup host venues. That's just upsetting as we would be an awesome host.
you know why, cause of greedy..30,000 can host a world cup group match, like I said greedy.. that why the world is the way it is today.. in the pass I see countries host the world cup and play out most the group matches in 40,000 seat stadium and the final play in the biggest stadium in that country that host, so don't let FIFA and those ppl fool you guys and yes they might step way from doing the world cup that way, but why! because its money driving and greedy they came up with all those stadium regulation, look how many beautiful soccer specific stadium been build in the US and host any soccer tournament and not one got chosen, stop for a minute and think, doest it really makes sense to you.. big big world cup they are using NFL stadium bro its embarressing 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
In 2026 NFL teams should use MLB, XFL or MLS Stadiums during FIFA World Cup Series New England Patriots at Red Sox Fenway Park NJ Giants at Red Bull Arena NY Jets at Citi Bank Field Philadelphia Eagles at Subaru Stadium in Chester, PA Kansas City Chiefs at Mercy Children’s Park Dallas Cowboys at Choctaw Stadium or Toyota Stadium Houston Texans at Shell-Energy Stadium for the future of the Astrodome Atlanta Falcons at Truist Park Miami Dolphins at Drive Pink Park In Lauderdale, FLA LA Rams at BMO Stadium (not 🇨🇦) or LA Dodgers Stadium LA Chargers at Angels Stadium San Francisco 49ers at PayPal Park in San Jose, California
Can I get a source for information regarding making several venues smaller, as when I look it up, it appears to be the opposite. Smaller venues, like BMO field, are actually expanding to meet world cup demand. Not saying you're wrong, I'm just tryna find that info myself and I can't
I thought SoFi Stadium was not dimensionally going to work and they venue might change? For the stadiums that have carpet I assume they will just be laying down grass? Which is not really ideal.
USA should be the only host. I dont get why US venues dont take more advantage. Why does Houston and Santa Clara get to host but not Vegas and New Orleans?! Cali and Texas already have a host, why 2? Why not take the opportunity to grow soccer in more states and in states where soccer isn't existence yet, it could help.
I think Canada should too. That is a country that would never spend billions to renovate its stadiums just for this tournament because they are smart and democratic snough to not do that. Mexico on the other hand should not host. The Azteca is not hosting the final, and they deserce to be the center of a tournament they would host with a few ither countries. Vegas and New Orleans were contacted but were eventually cut before the bid was submitted; New Orleans was cut earlier and Vegas was cut while the stadium was being built. California and Texas are the 2 biggest state economies in the US. The demand for 2 venues is there.
They call it the “San Francisco Bay Area”; when Stanford Stadium hosted in 94 it was also called San Francisco, and they do that because SF is the most famous city in the area
Sorry, but no offense for MEX will host 2 cities due to its political economics. USA will gain to host +1 of 12 total cities. CAN will stay same to host 2 cities. Just a constructive analysis here.
I seriously hope so- and Monterrey should be the city that gets cut. Summers there are brutal- and its an open air stadium. I wonder what US city would be added? (Hopefully Baltimore, since it is close to Washington DC).
@@cjhan9816 You didn't answer my question, but if that does happen, honestly at this point Guadalajara, with all the cartel problems in Jalisco would be the one to get likely cut.
It’s up against MetLife in New York, which has been the favorite for a while and has enough seats for the final (82,500 vs 70,240). SoFi is an absolutely awesome, awe-inspiring venue but another factor against it is that the Rose Bowl hosted the final in 94, so FIFA may give New York it’s chance
@@jrcanuck1 - It was unnecessary to add the others. It was done solely because Trump was POTUS at the time, and it was feared that no one wanted to reward him.
Agreed, Mexico got "crums" and with their WC history they should have refused to accept this insult. The US have more than enough venues to host it by itself, maybe adding a couple of cities in Canada is just right.
@@SilvanaDilno it was done because there’s too many teams in the World Cup, nowadays no matter how big, it’s unlikely only one country will be host from now on, look at the 2030 World Cup, it looks like all conmebol will host the World Cup 😂
Azteca is a terrible place to watch a game. Yes, Pele and Maradona won there; but where not watching games in SD anymore. Monterrey stadium is much better.
Sorry, but I just have to reply to Tact's petty little comment, as he always has openly been so jealous of Canada, after they dominated in the qualifiers last year, which, let's be honest, was the only legitimate tournament that had all of the best players playing in 2022. Canada beat both the U.S. & Mexico & ended up #1, with by far the best goal differential. Tact even had to bring up Canada's poor 1986 performance in the world cup... Really!!!! That is like pointing out the fact that the U.S. didn't even make it to the World cup in 1986. As a matter of fact, the U.S. didn't make it to the World cup, even once, between 1934 & 1950 & again between 1950 & 1990... But who cares about ancient history right? Then Tact said that Canada was one of the worst teams in the 2022 World cup; but he purposely failed to mention that Canada was unfortunately in the Group of death. Canada totally outplayed Belgium, the 2nd best FIFA ranked team in the World before that; but unfortunately Canada lost 1-0 and didn't get the bounces. Canada legitimately lost convincingly to Croatia 4-1 in their 2nd match & were outplayed; but hey, Croatia made it to the semi-finals & made it to the finals 4 years earlier, in the previous World cup in 2018. Canada then lost a close game 2-1 to Morocco, who, by the way, were also a semi-finalist. There is some small consolation in Canada finishing the loss against Morocco with 1.39 xG to Morocco’s 0.43. Canada owned a better xG than Belgium in their game, too. So, while statistically Canada finished 2nd last with 3 losses, in fact Canada punched well above their weight in 2 of their 3 matches against much higher ranked teams & I almost guarantee you that had the U.S. been in that group instead of Canada, they would have fared no better & probably worse, given how poorly they played in the qualifiers, tying 4th place Costa Rica in points. Either way, I look forward to the Nations League semifinals & finals & the 2026 World cup & all of the tournaments in between, even though the U.S. will have a huge homefield advantage for most of them, just as they will for most of the 2026 World cup. Canadians believe that Canada will perform very well in all of those tournaments. Hopefully that is not seen as arrogance; but rather, as a strong confidence that our team will be extremely competitive and have a very good chance of winning, every time they step on the pitch.
@@TacticalManager , typical sports banter includes statements such as our team is better than your team, or we'll beat you in the next match etc... Saying that our country was the 2nd worst in the World cup, goes beyond playful banter & I've seen you & Pete do it a number of times in not such a playful manner. Either way, your video called for an accurate reply, which could also be classified as a "soccer banter" response...
@@chuckobscure5622 , Seriously, you won a Friendly vs Morocco that counted for nothing, playing on your own home pitch... Morocco didn't even play star player Chelsea FC midfielder Hakim Ziyech, who was not injured and he was at the stadium. Guess Morocco didn't take that match too seriously... Maybe you didn't read my post all the way to the end. The trophies won by the U.S. in 2022 were for tournaments in which many of the best players for most countries were not participating in. Canada was missing several of their better players. Not to mention the fact that once again the U S. had a huge home field advantage. 'The Qualifiers' was by far the best tournament to judge CONCACAF teams, as the best players all played, unless injured & the matches were fairly played in all countries.
sorry for saying this. What is the US stadiums? I thought you guys give more attention to football I mean Soccer When Messi come to MLS,but Man you give NFL stadiums to WC? That is disrespcteful. What? Did your Country have enough bugdet to Construct A real Soccer Stadium? That is totally unacceptable 😢😅😂
All these stadiums will be forced to switch to grass fields, which is good. Hopefully they keep them that way.
They won’t sadly
It’s very expensive to keep up with grass, which is why all these NFL stadiums mostly use turf.
@@benwhealler4278 Yeah, that must be tough on those billionaire owners.
@@zherkezhi Should be all.
Detailed videos about the stadiums would be awesome!!
Yes, you pronounced Argonauts correctly. We actually pronounce BMO as Bee-Moe, and BMO Field is actually expanding its capability for the World Cup because its currently capacity is not big enough per FIFA's requirements. It's current capacity is roughly 40,000 and it's being expanded to 45,000 for the World Cup. One of the images you used is a rendering of said expansion.
Adding 17k seats. The stadium holds 28k right now. With a few more thousand when they expand capacity.
Chargers used to play in San Diego but moved to LA a few years ago like the rams from St. Louis. They even used to play in LA galaxy stadium before they built the sofi stadium.
Arrowhead is the loudest stadium in the world it will be rocking for the World Cup. Us KC soccer fans are looking forward to competent soccer in our city if we have 3 more years of Peter Vermes
I decided to start keeping a list back in 2015 of soccer games in NFL stadiums (and went back 10 years before that, so I have a list of every soccer game played in every NFL stadium that was built from 2005 onward). So here's the list of the ones that are World Cup venues for 2026.
SoFi Stadium in LA - 71,189 average (1 game)
AT&T Stadium in Arlington - 62,561 average (18 games)
MetLife Stadium in East Rutherford - 59,234 average (27 games)
Levi's Stadium in Santa Clara - 52,077 average (20 games)
Mercedes-Benz Stadium in Atlanta - 49,346 average (106 games)
It is definitely never too early to talk about the World Cup
Cowboys Stadium is probably the best designed stadium in America. Pains me to admit that as a Giants fan but that place is beautiful. Ive always loved how Metlife has a view of the NYC skyline in the backdrop though. Gonna be so cool and very strange seeing all these iconic American football stadiums filled to the brim for the world cup
Also Chargers moved to LA from san diego a few years back
Levi’s is in Santa Clara and the San Jose Earthquakes play there from time to time. Playing LAFC there this weekend (4/6/23) as an example. Usually when PayPal park is too small for the demand.
Going to Levi’s Stadium this week to cheer on my Quakes against LAFC. However it’s located in Santa Clara so it’s closer to San Jose than SF
I think all of these stadiums prove we are the kings of concacaf
Nice joke
Gillette is located in Foxborough which is about an hour or so away from Boston. I have been to Gillette twice now myself and it is a beautiful stadium.
I love this video and I think it will be a great idea to have videos about each of the stadiums to unravel some it's history and fun facts
Yes Tac, do a video for every individual stadium… also can you state your opinion on which stadiums you think would be better for the World Cup or at least the ones you wish were included
Yesss... give us more 2026 World Cup content!! ❤💙❤️💙❤️💙
Where the US Stadiums were concerned I often found it easier to remember that California and Texas both have 2 host cities.
CA: LA & San Fran
TX: Dallas & Houston
Add in Seattle up in the North West USA and there you have 5 out of the 11.
The remaining 6 includes: Boston, Philadelphia, New York City, Atlanta, Miami and Kansas City.
Loving the 2026 World Cup Videos!
would have enjoyed las vegas stadium that the raiders play in
It's not too early. You are the only one doing this. You are ahead of the curve bra...
5:55 *Santa Clara
RaymondJames Stadium in Tampa, FL should also be considered. Home of the former Tampa Bay Mutiny MSL and we have hosted several big football games. Capacity is over 75,000 and is natural grass.
Levi's is in santa clara, honestly more accurate to say San Jose than SF
MORE 2026 CONTENT!!!
….please 🙏🙏🙏🙏😁😁😁
The final should be at lumen field, mercedez benz stadium, or metlife
It'll be in Metlife Stadium. It was selected due to the immediate areas for huge fan zones to watch the game. It has the public transit to get fans around & the New York/New Jersey area also has tourist attractions for the fans to see/visit while they're there.
But if you ask me, it's also likely due to the timezone Metlife Stadium is in, the Eastern US Timezone. Which is 5-6 hours behind European time. So, if Kick off was set for 3pm Eastern US time, it'll be 8-9pm European time. Which is the usual time for European games are played.
For South America, the time zones are fairly close to Eastern US. And given that Europe & South America are the sport's biggest audiences, having the Final at Metlife Stadium would be best to get as many viewers as possible.
We The fans want to know more about the facility. Will it have a natural grass field for the World Cup. It should. What other dimensions of the stadium will be done. The removed seating will it stay or be returned to box seating levels. We would like to know.
Hoping we get some good games at Lumen field! It's going to be great!
I'm still disappointed that Chicago isnt one of the host cities. Tired of the Fire stinking up Soldier Field
According to FIFA regulations, the stadium hosting a final must have a seating minimum of 80,000. There's only 2 stadiums that have that capacity. AT & T stadium in Dallas and Met Life Stadium in New Jersey. Most likely the final will be held in NJ
Listen man FIFA is just Fuxk corruption its all driving by money, you don't needed 80,000 seat to host a world game, all don't see what they are doing lol.. bro use your brain fifa along with hosting country have gotten greedy yes greedy and money hungry, that any country can actually how the world cup right about now, all the needed is just 5 good stadiums that it brother so all this rule about regulations that they put in place the reason for those rule like I said its just greedy..
Of course it makes sense for FIFA to have the Final in NJ, why would they choose a stadium in Dallas over a venue close to the capital of the world, New York??
Most of the stadiums will be reduced in capacity due to the positions they will use for the press and television broadcasts
US Soccer HQ is in Chicago and they still did not make it into one of the 2026 World cup host venues. That's just upsetting as we would be an awesome host.
you know why, cause of greedy..30,000 can host a world cup group match, like I said greedy.. that why the world is the way it is today.. in the pass I see countries host the world cup and play out most the group matches in 40,000 seat stadium and the final play in the biggest stadium in that country that host, so don't let FIFA and those ppl fool you guys and yes they might step way from doing the world cup that way, but why! because its money driving and greedy they came up with all those stadium regulation, look how many beautiful soccer specific stadium been build in the US and host any soccer tournament and not one got chosen, stop for a minute and think, doest it really makes sense to you.. big big world cup they are using NFL stadium bro its embarressing 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Yes, please go indept for all the venues!
I what all detailed about the stadiums.
Are you going to make separate videos for each stadium?
In 2026 NFL teams should use MLB, XFL or MLS Stadiums during FIFA World Cup Series
New England Patriots at Red Sox Fenway Park
NJ Giants at Red Bull Arena
NY Jets at Citi Bank Field
Philadelphia Eagles at Subaru Stadium in Chester, PA
Kansas City Chiefs at Mercy Children’s Park
Dallas Cowboys at Choctaw Stadium or Toyota Stadium
Houston Texans at Shell-Energy Stadium for the future of the Astrodome
Atlanta Falcons at Truist Park
Miami Dolphins at Drive Pink Park In Lauderdale, FLA
LA Rams at BMO Stadium (not 🇨🇦) or LA Dodgers Stadium
LA Chargers at Angels Stadium
San Francisco 49ers at PayPal Park in San Jose, California
Bmo field is getting bigger not smaller for the World Cup
Got it!
Can I get a source for information regarding making several venues smaller, as when I look it up, it appears to be the opposite. Smaller venues, like BMO field, are actually expanding to meet world cup demand. Not saying you're wrong, I'm just tryna find that info myself and I can't
Hopefully the final is in MetLife I’ll definitely go to it
I thought SoFi Stadium was not dimensionally going to work and they venue might change?
For the stadiums that have carpet I assume they will just be laying down grass? Which is not really ideal.
Hey Tac,
You going to the Gold Cup match vs Nicaragua? I'll be there. Would love to grab you a drink and shit.
Gillette is Foxborough Tac don’t clickbait them 💀
😂😂😂
Philly fans mix with World Cup fans is going to be crazy
USA should be the only host. I dont get why US venues dont take more advantage. Why does Houston and Santa Clara get to host but not Vegas and New Orleans?! Cali and Texas already have a host, why 2? Why not take the opportunity to grow soccer in more states and in states where soccer isn't existence yet, it could help.
I think Canada should too. That is a country that would never spend billions to renovate its stadiums just for this tournament because they are smart and democratic snough to not do that. Mexico on the other hand should not host. The Azteca is not hosting the final, and they deserce to be the center of a tournament they would host with a few ither countries.
Vegas and New Orleans were contacted but were eventually cut before the bid was submitted; New Orleans was cut earlier and Vegas was cut while the stadium was being built.
California and Texas are the 2 biggest state economies in the US. The demand for 2 venues is there.
Bruhh.. Levi's is in Santa Clara. 45min from SF. They need to stop confusing people.
They call it the “San Francisco Bay Area”; when Stanford Stadium hosted in 94 it was also called San Francisco, and they do that because SF is the most famous city in the area
Should’ve had it in Michigan stadium, over 100,000 seats, we have more than 5 stadiums with this many seats and we don’t have ONE game in one of them?
Michigan Stadium was never contacted by the bid committee. Ford Field was, but it was cut early on.
@@hmdwgf ohh, I see, mb then
Sorry, but no offense for MEX will host 2 cities due to its political economics. USA will gain to host +1 of 12 total cities. CAN will stay same to host 2 cities. Just a constructive analysis here.
I seriously hope so- and Monterrey should be the city that gets cut. Summers there are brutal- and its an open air stadium. I wonder what US city would be added? (Hopefully Baltimore, since it is close to Washington DC).
@@hmdwgf: Yes, along I-95 Atlantic N/E corridor.
So question: what makes you say that, and what city do you think will be dropped?
@@hmdwgf: Monterrey or Guadalajara to drop as a MEX host city for 26 W/C. Baltimore or Nashville as a USA host city to gain for 26 W/C.
@@cjhan9816 You didn't answer my question, but if that does happen, honestly at this point Guadalajara, with all the cartel problems in Jalisco would be the one to get likely cut.
Are they still wanting 44 national teams on the 2026 world cup?
I'm hoping sofi stadium hosts the final...
It’s up against MetLife in New York, which has been the favorite for a while and has enough seats for the final (82,500 vs 70,240). SoFi is an absolutely awesome, awe-inspiring venue but another factor against it is that the Rose Bowl hosted the final in 94, so FIFA may give New York it’s chance
We should have just hosted the 2026 World Cup by ourselves (USA). I’m pretty sure we would have won with a solo bid.
Yeah, because why share with your CONCACAF neighbours right?
@@jrcanuck1 - It was unnecessary to add the others. It was done solely because Trump was POTUS at the time, and it was feared that no one wanted to reward him.
Agreed, Mexico got "crums" and with their WC history they should have refused to accept this insult. The US have more than enough venues to host it by itself, maybe adding a couple of cities in Canada is just right.
@@SilvanaDilno it was done because there’s too many teams in the World Cup, nowadays no matter how big, it’s unlikely only one country will be host from now on, look at the 2030 World Cup, it looks like all conmebol will host the World Cup 😂
@@bryangonzales4198 - It may be difficult for some countries to host a tournament with 48 teams, but the USA could've handled it easily.
Metlife stadium
man is from america and knows nothing about the nfl like what
So no game in Ohio? Most diverse state in the Country
Cleveland was cut before the bid was submitted, Cincinnati was cut last year (it never had a chance).
Azteca stadium needs major revelations
It will have a renovation I think, don't be salty about it.
Yeah it will
69. Nice
Azteca is a terrible place to watch a game. Yes, Pele and Maradona won there; but where not watching games in SD anymore. Monterrey stadium is much better.
It’s a super important and historic stadium, hence why it was picked.
This stadium are kinda lame
Canada owns the u.s 😂😂
2-0
Canada doesn't even own a decently sized, modern stadium.
@@SilvanaDil thats what makes it worse 🤣
@@Hagi223 - Somehow that makes sense and is funny -- unfortunately in your head only.
Sorry, but I just have to reply to Tact's petty little comment, as he always has openly been so jealous of Canada, after they dominated in the qualifiers last year, which, let's be honest, was the only legitimate tournament that had all of the best players playing in 2022. Canada beat both the U.S. & Mexico & ended up #1, with by far the best goal differential.
Tact even had to bring up Canada's poor 1986 performance in the world cup... Really!!!! That is like pointing out the fact that the U.S. didn't even make it to the World cup in 1986. As a matter of fact, the U.S. didn't make it to the World cup, even once, between 1934 & 1950 & again between 1950 & 1990... But who cares about ancient history right?
Then Tact said that Canada was one of the worst teams in the 2022 World cup; but he purposely failed to mention that Canada was unfortunately in the Group of death.
Canada totally outplayed Belgium, the 2nd best FIFA ranked team in the World before that; but unfortunately Canada lost 1-0 and didn't get the bounces.
Canada legitimately lost convincingly to Croatia 4-1 in their 2nd match & were outplayed; but hey, Croatia made it to the semi-finals & made it to the finals 4 years earlier, in the previous World cup in 2018.
Canada then lost a close game 2-1 to Morocco, who, by the way, were also a semi-finalist.
There is some small consolation in Canada finishing the loss against Morocco with 1.39 xG to Morocco’s 0.43. Canada owned a better xG than Belgium in their game, too.
So, while statistically Canada finished 2nd last with 3 losses, in fact Canada punched well above their weight in 2 of their 3 matches against much higher ranked teams & I almost guarantee you that had the U.S. been in that group instead of Canada, they would have fared no better & probably worse, given how poorly they played in the qualifiers, tying 4th place Costa Rica in points.
Either way, I look forward to the Nations League semifinals & finals & the 2026 World cup & all of the tournaments in between, even though the U.S. will have a huge homefield advantage for most of them, just as they will for most of the 2026 World cup.
Canadians believe that Canada will perform very well in all of those tournaments. Hopefully that is not seen as arrogance; but rather, as a strong confidence that our team will be extremely competitive and have a very good chance of winning, every time they step on the pitch.
It’s just banter, it’s not too deep.
Very common in soccer.
@@TacticalManager - Canadian snowflakes have an inferiority complex wjen it comes to anything USA.
@@TacticalManager , typical sports banter includes statements such as our team is better than your team, or we'll beat you in the next match etc... Saying that our country was the 2nd worst in the World cup, goes beyond playful banter & I've seen you & Pete do it a number of times in not such a playful manner.
Either way, your video called for an accurate reply, which could also be classified as a "soccer banter" response...
@jrcanuck1 We spanked Morocco 3-0, and hold both regional trophies
@@chuckobscure5622 , Seriously, you won a Friendly vs Morocco that counted for nothing, playing on your own home pitch... Morocco didn't even play star player Chelsea FC midfielder Hakim Ziyech, who was not injured and he was at the stadium. Guess Morocco didn't take that match too seriously...
Maybe you didn't read my post all the way to the end. The trophies won by the U.S. in 2022 were for tournaments in which many of the best players for most countries were not participating in.
Canada was missing several of their better players. Not to mention the fact that once again the U S. had a huge home field advantage.
'The Qualifiers' was by far the best tournament to judge CONCACAF teams, as the best players all played, unless injured & the matches were fairly played in all countries.
sorry for saying this. What is the US stadiums? I thought you guys give more attention to football I mean Soccer When Messi come to MLS,but Man you give NFL stadiums to WC?
That is disrespcteful. What? Did your Country have enough bugdet to Construct A real Soccer Stadium? That is totally unacceptable 😢😅😂