If BIG OIL fails, do we all go down with it??

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 5 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 1.2K

  • @broncogeorge
    @broncogeorge 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +198

    When you put a fox in charge of the hen coop you shouldn’t be surprised when it eats the chickens. The COP presidency is a complete joke and his outrage speech to address the elephant in the room was pathetic.

    • @autohmae
      @autohmae 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      COOP or COP almost the same thing, right ? 🙂

    • @scottslotterbeck3796
      @scottslotterbeck3796 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      There is no climate emergency.
      Stop lying, Bald Dave.

    • @jamesreynolds5045
      @jamesreynolds5045 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      My question here is; how did an obvious Big Oil proponent (Sheik Jabber'wooky) get picked? If it smells like shit, looks like shit, it is shit!

    • @mfb424
      @mfb424 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Maybe the thought it was ”Conference of Oil Producers”? 🤷🏼 A place to sign some more of those slippery and oily deals.

    • @scottslotterbeck3796
      @scottslotterbeck3796 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The coordinated efforts to reset our entire civilization in order to prevent a “climate crisis” are an obvious and troubling example of elites grasping for more control, and less competition. And their agenda is so fatally flawed - renewables cannot power the global economy, and “owning nothing” does not make people happy, it destroys their character - that it is fair to wonder what truly motivates them? Satanic greed? Malevolent reptilian aliens gaining the upper hand in earth’s cosmic battlefield?

  • @kbmblizz1940
    @kbmblizz1940 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +365

    COP has evolved from incompetent to corrupt, as expected by us cynics.

    • @wolfgangpreier9160
      @wolfgangpreier9160 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      I've known that since i first heard about it, more than 40 years ago. It was called different but the result is the same.

    • @stickynorth
      @stickynorth 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Bingo! It's an annual farce of greenwashing and hypocrisy...

    • @stofjes4204
      @stofjes4204 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The co2 maffia is corrupt as hell you mean. There is no co2 problem at all.

    • @philipm3173
      @philipm3173 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      Secrecy is the best defense of incompetence and incompetence is the best protection of corruption.

    • @bbodyboi
      @bbodyboi 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      It’s nice being able to think “man I’m either a genius or a psychic” just by assuming/expecting the worst behavior out of humans 😂

  • @JRattheranch
    @JRattheranch 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +284

    Don't ever stop your "prattle" Dave! It makes you unique and so engrossing in the science you're conveying! Your closing remarks were an excellent example of your previous assessment. To be enabled to laugh and assimilate your content, is priceless!

    • @a.randomjack6661
      @a.randomjack6661 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The "i" in Life stands for irony. The other 3 letters are still a mystery though 🤷‍♂

    • @RLee-zs1ds
      @RLee-zs1ds 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      L for love, F for fornicate and E for Enjoy........@@a.randomjack6661

    • @scottslotterbeck3796
      @scottslotterbeck3796 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The coordinated efforts to reset our entire civilization in order to prevent a “climate crisis” are an obvious and troubling example of elites grasping for more control, and less competition. And their agenda is so fatally flawed - renewables cannot power the global economy, and “owning nothing” does not make people happy, it destroys their character - that it is fair to wonder what truly motivates them? Satanic greed? Malevolent reptilian aliens gaining the upper hand in earth’s cosmic battlefield?

    • @beatreuteler
      @beatreuteler 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@a.randomjack6661 Love & Irony Furthers Education?

    • @a.randomjack6661
      @a.randomjack6661 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@beatreuteler Could be, could be... Took me decades to figure out the "i".... Education has to be there in some form, but "education" is vague'ish...

  • @Ashleycorrie8494
    @Ashleycorrie8494 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +410

    We need to normalize a simple lifestyle and stop normalizing debt. Huge SUVs, huge houses and private universities are simply not necessary. I live within my budget and I sleep better at night knowing that if I lose my job tomorrow, ' be fine. I didn't buy the biggest house. I bought the one I could comfortably repay

    • @MichealTanner141
      @MichealTanner141 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      Yeah can being frugal be sexy please? recently mentioned that I'm frugal to a young woman and she gave me the weirdest look... Being financially responsible is looked down on

    • @PennyBurdick318
      @PennyBurdick318 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I think people should also seriously look into investing of some kind. Something that brings money back to your pocket, real estate, stocks, whatever can bring back value to their bank account rather than draining it. Obviously investing has its risks but so does just having money in depreciating assets or straight up liabilities.

    • @Seanmirrer
      @Seanmirrer 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Big house suv. Bruh you got people driving Honda civics, living in a 1 bedroom apartment and not a luxury one at that living paycheck to paycheck.
      The median rent is 2000. A lot of financial professionals especially the one I work with Samuel Peter Descovich agree that one should not spend more than 30% of their gross income on rent. That means you need to make a minimum of about $80,000. Interesting considering the median income is $54,000.

    • @GaryWinstonBrown
      @GaryWinstonBrown 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Thank you for sharing your experience and knowledge. Your coach was simple to discover online. I did my research on him before I wrote to him. He appears knowledgeable based on his online resume.

    • @RandalHebert
      @RandalHebert 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Found his website easily. It was like the first thing that came up when I searched his name. I'll surely touch basis with him to see what the best step is for me to take right now. THANK YOU!!!

  • @chinookvalley
    @chinookvalley 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +149

    My dad got out of the oil biz to protect the environment! I'm so proud that he took a stand and did what was right, and that was back in 1955! He would take the family on vacation every year just to show us the horrid effects of the oil/gas industry. I remember he would sit and cry and tell us how beautiful an area USED to be. We could have gotten oil royalties in the millions, but he said every time someone signs a check they are giving the oil industry the okay to kill the planet.

    • @imacmill
      @imacmill 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Copypasta?

    • @scottslotterbeck3796
      @scottslotterbeck3796 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Bald Dave refuses to debate a REAL climate scientist.
      Wonder why???

    • @johngrundowski3632
      @johngrundowski3632 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      My father was a coal miner - he wanted IT TO END ,,,we owe it to future generations 🌐

    • @scottslotterbeck3796
      @scottslotterbeck3796 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@johngrundowski3632 China still building coal-fired plants every two weeks.

    • @everythingmatters6308
      @everythingmatters6308 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Your father was an outstanding person. This world would be paradise if everyone was like him.

  • @juliusmazzarella9711
    @juliusmazzarella9711 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +63

    I sense your frustration Dave but hang in there, without folks like yourself to get the truth out we would really be lost. Your one of the few ecology researchers that get's the real information out to the public.

    • @5353Jumper
      @5353Jumper 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      All we need is for people like Dave to actually run for government office sometimes.

    • @REDTEDddd
      @REDTEDddd 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@5353Jumper I'm ' newish' to this channel. Has Dave ever mentioned earths weakening magnetic fields?

    • @5353Jumper
      @5353Jumper 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      @REDTEDddd yes but that topic is nearly irrelevant to the primary conversation of climate change so it does not come up much.

    • @scottslotterbeck3796
      @scottslotterbeck3796 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Bald Dave is a bald-faced liar.

    • @dougchatch
      @dougchatch 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@5353Jumper Or is it?? @REDTEDddd may have just spawned the deniers next explanation on why the planet is really heating up. :0 lol

  • @leftcoaster67
    @leftcoaster67 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +40

    For the polite Englishman. :D

    • @scottslotterbeck3796
      @scottslotterbeck3796 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The Bald Lying charlatan

    • @jennyfeatherstone3574
      @jennyfeatherstone3574 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      👏👏👏

    • @scottslotterbeck3796
      @scottslotterbeck3796 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The coordinated efforts to reset our entire civilization in order to prevent a “climate crisis” are an obvious and troubling example of elites grasping for more control, and less competition. And their agenda is so fatally flawed - renewables cannot power the global economy, and “owning nothing” does not make people happy, it destroys their character - that it is fair to wonder what truly motivates them? Satanic greed? Malevolent reptilian aliens gaining the upper hand in earth’s cosmic battlefield?

    • @JZsBFF
      @JZsBFF 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      From my experience an Englishman is just as long polite as you don't try to screw him and when that happens, all hell breaks loose.

  • @zombi3lif3
    @zombi3lif3 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +67

    I think some cynical oil companies managed to push Daves buttons this week 😅
    I'm with you Dave! One of the best climate channels on youtube 💪

    • @PeterTodd
      @PeterTodd 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Yes the BEEEEP factor was high this week : )

  • @toughenupfluffy7294
    @toughenupfluffy7294 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +192

    So mammals will ultimately be done in by dinosaurs after all? Ironic.

    • @terencefield3204
      @terencefield3204 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

      The best post in DECADES!!!!!!!!!!!

    • @steffen1405
      @steffen1405 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Mostly prehistoric forests actually, but that we'll ultimately be decimated by the nature we're eviscerating, is of no surprise. If it wasn't for that 1 asteroid, we'd never have evolved, so maybe we weren't supposed to be here at all, and radioactive dinosaurs will one day roam again, but this time over our carparks and shopping malls...

    • @Yorkshireasaurus
      @Yorkshireasaurus 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      It would be ironic if it was correct.

    • @TheHonestPeanut
      @TheHonestPeanut 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

      Well no. It's made from organic life that predates our dinosaur ancestors. Interesting none the less.

    • @ALaz502
      @ALaz502 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The VAST majority of oil is not made of dinosaurs.

  • @matthewm2139
    @matthewm2139 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

    Very appreciative of both your honesty and gentility.

  • @umfuturopossivel2137
    @umfuturopossivel2137 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +92

    As a brazillian citizen, it is shamefull about how my home country is collaborating with this scrutiny. Lula allow oil exploration on ter Amazon basin. That's obscene.

    • @SeattlePioneer
      @SeattlePioneer 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    • @richardlangley90
      @richardlangley90 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      @@SeattlePioneerIf the "business" in this scenario was a petrochemical, forestry, mining or food conglomerate you would be wise to say no thanks. You can bet that these folks would be pushed onto the crappiest piece of land available (assuming they refused to move to the big cities where they would quickly find that even with a billion dollars they would not have a happy or safe life). The forests around them would be razed, the water polluted, the animals and food they rely on for their traditional food and other needs would disappear and if they got in the way of the conglomerates rented army they would be murdered.
      If these folks were smart and needed medical assistance they would be far better off (by order of magnitude) to call on Doctors without Border.

    • @SeattlePioneer
      @SeattlePioneer 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I am not AT ALL surprised that you prefer to see populations remain mired in poverty, ignorance and early death to the life YOU no doubt lead.
      That is really the environmentalist plan for humanity, in my view.

    • @nathanlevesque7812
      @nathanlevesque7812 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You are correct. It always ends up being exploitation. @@richardlangley90

    • @johgude5045
      @johgude5045 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@richardlangley90 exactly that. If you give these fossil guys a hand, they will ripp off your arm. Sad truth

  • @milestaylor7096
    @milestaylor7096 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +75

    Excellent as usual Dave, thank you. It pains me to report that the new government of NZ, where I live, has authorised fresh oil and gas exploration. We'd have been on track for the " Biggest laughing stock at COP" award until that idiot piped up with his " There is no science..." drivel and nicked the prize from us.

    • @mafarmerga
      @mafarmerga 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      So sad for you Miles.
      I visit NZ from the US every year, and with the recent revoking of the Tobacco Free Generation policy and now a reconsideration of the Treaty of Waitangi it makes wonder..What is happening to New Zealand??

    • @chromagraphphotoart
      @chromagraphphotoart 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      Lot of competition for that particular award... What about Wishy Washy Rishi Sunak's weasly explanation for why the Uk has set back the banning of petrol and diesel cars by five years 'because 'Everyone else is doing that...'

    • @gpsfinancial6988
      @gpsfinancial6988 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@mafarmerga Unfortunately the previous Government lost social license. Māori have many viewpoints (over 30% of the new cabinet is Māori), but the Government appeared to only listen to Māori extremists, which unsettled the voters. The Greens refused to even consider a Teal coalition, handing the keys to known 'drunk drivers' instead. Had the largest party (National) got an extra 1%? of the vote, most of the more unusual changes would not be happening.

    • @peterd9698
      @peterd9698 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@gpsfinancial6988 It is amazing how the left is always responsible for every batshit crazy evil BS the right enacts to blatantly enrich their donors at the expense of everyone's future.

    • @jnawk83
      @jnawk83 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      what a RCF. Luxon is an ass.

  • @mrpaul5726
    @mrpaul5726 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +95

    You are absolutely correct and it is definitely achievable and also essential but looking at the investment plans of the entire Energy Sector, Oil, Gas, Coal included the trajectory of climate change is now heading for 3c and it is looking more and more likely the transition will happen too little and too late. I wish I was wrong but the real reason I feel this is the underlying greed and selfishness we see at work in every sector of society, the immense challenge at hand is not just about CO2, Fossil Fuel and Climate Change its about a dysfunctional human family.

    • @RussCR5187
      @RussCR5187 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The world's (psychopathic) billionaire oligarchs don't believe it's possible either. That's why they are working hard on a financial crash, centralized financial control, and global totalitarian governance with them as rulers (of course; they "know best") and us as serfs. CBDC, Digital IDs, vaccine passports, advanced AI ... it's all part of the plan.

    • @tombradshaw5164
      @tombradshaw5164 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      'trajectory of climate change is now heading for 3c.' That's a very interesting philosophical statement. To what 'climate change', specifically, are you referring? Firstly, climates across the world are many and varied, and secondly, the World Meteorological Organization (WMO, but prior to 1950, the IMO), has never officially acknowledged a change of climate anywhere in the world. Climates are a function of: Latitude, Elevation, Proximity to large bodies of water, Ocean Currents, Topographical Features, Vegetation, and Prevailing and Seasonal Winds. Please explain how the combustion of fossil (hydrocarbon) fuels overrides all of the aforementioned.
      Finally, in the vicinity of the 10 busiest airports in the world by aircarft movements, the combustion of hydrocarbon fuels by air, and the associated road traffic, has not resulted in any change of climate. The same can be said if the 50 most populated cities in world, with their associated significant air and road traffic (copious quantities of hydrocarbon being combusted), hasn't brought forth any change of climate in those locations either.
      In conclusion, TELL ME WHERE the combustion of hydrocarbon fuels results in the "dreaded climate change"??

    • @mcarpenter2917
      @mcarpenter2917 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

      @@tombradshaw5164 "Please explain how the combustion of fossil (hydrocarbon) fuels overrides all of the aforementioned." -> By trapping inferred light at the surface of the earth and reducing the amount of heat that radiates into space", explained.

    • @spud95128
      @spud95128 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

      ​@@tombradshaw5164Oh come on man. Spend some time studying the basics before asking us to explain it for you. I'd recommend books and journals rather than the dark corners of the internet you seem to be getting your current arguments from

    • @mrpaul5726
      @mrpaul5726 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Nobelist, physicist, Stanford professor, Steven Chu@@tombradshaw5164

  • @pdxyadayada
    @pdxyadayada 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +35

    I enthusiastically await your episode, each week. You’re the only TH-camr I support on Patreon (slight as it may be). Keep up the good work..

    • @scottslotterbeck3796
      @scottslotterbeck3796 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Dave is a charlatan. He's getting rich scaring children like you.
      There is no climate emergency.

    • @scottslotterbeck3796
      @scottslotterbeck3796 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The coordinated efforts to reset our entire civilization in order to prevent a “climate crisis” are an obvious and troubling example of elites grasping for more control, and less competition. And their agenda is so fatally flawed - renewables cannot power the global economy, and “owning nothing” does not make people happy, it destroys their character - that it is fair to wonder what truly motivates them? Satanic greed? Malevolent reptilian aliens gaining the upper hand in earth’s cosmic battlefield?

  • @AndyWearsPants
    @AndyWearsPants 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +86

    We need an alternative to COP that is structured to prevent this kind of thing from happening.

    • @CRMcGee2
      @CRMcGee2 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

      Conning
      Ordinary
      People

    • @Praylak
      @Praylak 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Yes, but what is stopping big oil from hijacking them, if they haven't already?

    • @wolfgangpreier9160
      @wolfgangpreier9160 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      UNO? CCP? USA? EU?
      Currently i would prefer Matrix or Skynet if I'm honest.

    • @wolfgangpreier9160
      @wolfgangpreier9160 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@PraylakThey have. You can be totally sure bout that. Money rules the worl. Much money rules the rest.

    • @wolfgangpreier9160
      @wolfgangpreier9160 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@erdelegy Antisemits? No thank you.

  • @linusvanhove482
    @linusvanhove482 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    Thank you to bring this update. It makes me hopefull again to see those clear statements to be widespread by large organisations lile the IEA

  • @punditgi
    @punditgi 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Hurrah for Dave! Well done by a polite and circumspect Englishman! 😊

  • @Stuartrusty
    @Stuartrusty 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

    Sharp and incisive sarcastic wit and this time with bleeps! As always, considerable effort and research goes into these videos, much gratitude. Those reasons are why I come back every week to your channel.

  • @andrewsmith2591
    @andrewsmith2591 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

    I agree that it is a 'cop out' for those who say that usage of coal, oil and gas is demand driven. But it is an understandable position, when viewed though the lens of global politics. The country that becomes the 'first mover' in reducing supply of coal, oil and gas will ultimately be trashing their own economy and other nations would simply pick up the slack and become richer at the same time. This is not a 'short term' proposition, it's a 'medium to long term' problem.

    • @davidmenasco5743
      @davidmenasco5743 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The world's economic, political, and communication systems are fundamentally incapable of dealing with the problem.
      The fallout from climate change, among other things, will ensure that these systems are radically transformed over the next hundred years.
      Today's elites, and activists, face the question, what kind of changes do they want to see?

    • @scottslotterbeck3796
      @scottslotterbeck3796 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The coordinated efforts to reset our entire civilization in order to prevent a “climate crisis” are an obvious and troubling example of elites grasping for more control, and less competition. And their agenda is so fatally flawed - renewables cannot power the global economy, and “owning nothing” does not make people happy, it destroys their character - that it is fair to wonder what truly motivates them? Satanic greed? Malevolent reptilian aliens gaining the upper hand in earth’s cosmic battlefield?

  • @in-cite
    @in-cite 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Thank you for your courage and truthfulness.

  • @shawnr771
    @shawnr771 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Thank you for the commentary.

  • @doa1001
    @doa1001 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    Lmao, the bleep machine is working overtime.

  • @trueriver1950
    @trueriver1950 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +46

    Peak oil this decade is not enough. We need net zero this decade, in my opinion, in order not to overshoot significantly.

    • @davidjohnson-tq4qx
      @davidjohnson-tq4qx 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      It doesn't matter how much you save if if it makes it cheaper for the rest of the worlds populations. You have to end the production world wide or it doesn't matter. That is the challenge

    • @joemccarthy7120
      @joemccarthy7120 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Whose lives are you willing to sacrifice to achieve that goal?

    • @hansverbeek822
      @hansverbeek822 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      peakoil may already be behind us in end of 2018 or beginning of 2019.
      peakoilbarrel.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/World-1.png

    • @wolfgangpreier9160
      @wolfgangpreier9160 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      We are already overshooting. You are too late.
      End of 2100 it will be about 2.5 degrees worldwide and 7 degrees in Germany. Arctis and Siberia 10-15 degrees. End of 2200 Greenland is free and can be conquered after all the earthquakes have stopped, Canada will be overrun by south american refugeees.
      End of 2300 the seas have risen 70 meters there are less than 1 billion people left, most of civilization has broken down and antarctica is free for the first time in millions of years.
      Look what they've found: Atlantis!

    • @REDTEDddd
      @REDTEDddd 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@wolfgangpreier9160
      Mmmmmmmm :-/ Not from Co2 though.

  • @LeeHounshell
    @LeeHounshell 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    Thanks Dave! Your videos are eye opening amazing.

  • @LivingProcess
    @LivingProcess 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Brilliant as always 💚♻️

  • @achenarmyst2156
    @achenarmyst2156 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Hi Dave, a good rant is supporting mental health when facing all this bull-„beeeep“. So carry on please, it helps all of us. 😄

  • @paulcini5849
    @paulcini5849 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Thanks for the detailed analysis. Very informative

  • @panchostanza8712
    @panchostanza8712 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Net Zero by 2050? Not a snowball's chance in Hell

    • @scottslotterbeck3796
      @scottslotterbeck3796 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Nor should we. Drill baby drill!!!

    • @JZsBFF
      @JZsBFF 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      By that time we'll all be dead as a doughnut... and they know it! So why would THEY stop the party that they're having?

    • @MrBigbangbuzz
      @MrBigbangbuzz 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      90 percent of oil is Industry yet we are being told buying an EV will help

    • @panchostanza8712
      @panchostanza8712 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@MrBigbangbuzz
      "90 percent of oil is Industry"
      In the USA it's about 28%; transportation is 66%
      www.eia.gov/energyexplained/oil-and-petroleum-products/use-of-oil.php

    • @JZsBFF
      @JZsBFF 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@MrBigbangbuzz It's becoming more and more main stream that EV is neither the answer to climate change nor environmentally sane; but it's a great new way to make a lot of money for some people.

  • @13minutestomidnight
    @13minutestomidnight 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +28

    Hehehe I love the IEA. They always use hard science and documented facts to make a reasonable statement about the energy industry and governmental policy. Great stuff as usual.
    And yes, it is very annoying when people try to suggest the oil and gas industry can't cut down when there is ample evidence that it is necessary to do so. Unfortunately the recent war with Ukraine and Russia has left many people feeling the energy insecurity, but everyone tends to ignore the fact that longterm planning by governments can avoid such issues. If they're really concerned, nuclear is the best way to provide stable baseline power

    • @davidmenasco5743
      @davidmenasco5743 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      A technical argument for nuclear might have stood up to scrutiny 20 or 30 years ago (or might not). But at this point in time, solar and wind and battery storage would take less than half the time and cost a small fraction of the price to achieve the same energy generation.
      Wind and especially solar also have the advantage of decentralization - or at least the technical feasibility of it. This is a huge difference that is almost as important as the huge cost difference.
      In any event, time is of the essence. Solar, wind and battery storage must be built out as quickly as we - the population of the earth - can possibly build it.

    • @tomikexboii5403
      @tomikexboii5403 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@davidmenasco5743 What about countries that do not have offshore wind or solar resources? Like Scandinavia or central Europe, or most of central and northern Asia? So should we just suck the cock up for the team and be little bitches for those who do have those resources? Yeah, f**k no.

    • @howtoappearincompletely9739
      @howtoappearincompletely9739 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@davidmenasco5743 You still need baseline power. Fortunately, geothermal and hydroelectric power are good for that, but you need to build them into your argument.

    • @richardlangley90
      @richardlangley90 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@howtoappearincompletely9739 " You still need baseline power." No, you are misinformed. Do some research instead of assuming you are right without evidence.

    • @davidmenasco5743
      @davidmenasco5743 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@howtoappearincompletely9739 There are ways to get baseline from batteries.

  • @cht2162
    @cht2162 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Thanks for letting 'em have it, Dave. Big oil needs real COPS.

    • @JZsBFF
      @JZsBFF 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      They OWN the COPS !

  • @DavidAlsh
    @DavidAlsh 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +31

    It was 41C (106F) in Sydney yesterday. I sat in my uninsulated rental apartment with my air conditioner doing the best it could as the heat leaked through every surface exposed to the outside world.
    It was crazy to look out the window and see paradise-like sunny weather which, in reality, was so inhospitable that I may as well have been living on mars.
    Sure do wish someone would take this whole climate change thing seriously, I feel like I have experienced more than my fair share of "once in a 100 years" events.

    • @bastiaan7777777
      @bastiaan7777777 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Maybe Sidney (and many other places in the world) were not ment to be inhabited (on this scale) on this location.
      "Sure do wish someone would take this whole climate change thing seriously, "
      Also, we have to things so you can keep your airco on? How about.. you turn it off..... and take this climate change thing seriously....

    • @scottslotterbeck3796
      @scottslotterbeck3796 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Gee...summer is hot. Imagine that.
      Did you know there is NO USA state with record temperatures in the 21st century?
      Hottest temperature ever recorded was in Death Valley...in 1934!!!
      Hottest temperature in Sacramento, 1924!!!

    • @philipm3173
      @philipm3173 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      It's very serious, that's why you have to ignore it perpetually.

    • @abyssmanur3965
      @abyssmanur3965 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@scottslotterbeck3796
      It's about the hottest average temperature.

    • @DrSmooth2000
      @DrSmooth2000 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      40 is when some plants, not all, quit firing on all cylinders. Close to paradise for them so long as catch rain

  • @hughwaller6789
    @hughwaller6789 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Go Dave go! You are saying what needs to be said and more power to you.

  • @tedbomba6631
    @tedbomba6631 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

    Was anyone truly surprised that this is exactly what the UAE was planning when they proposed holding the conference in their kingdom ? I certainly hope not.

  • @markdev4796
    @markdev4796 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    Would be interesting to see more into how COP is structured, how are host countries selected and sponsors and presidents selected. How do lobbyists weasle in to the event. I think the UN has some work to do to tidy this up so we don't throw the baby out with the bath water.

  • @philreilly6959
    @philreilly6959 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    Great (if very worrying) video, Dave. I too don't have enough money to say anything about the COP chairman, but I totally agree with your assessment (which you clearly didn't give, for obvious reasons)!!!

    • @scottslotterbeck3796
      @scottslotterbeck3796 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The coordinated efforts to reset our entire civilization in order to prevent a “climate crisis” are an obvious and troubling example of elites grasping for more control, and less competition. And their agenda is so fatally flawed - renewables cannot power the global economy, and “owning nothing” does not make people happy, it destroys their character - that it is fair to wonder what truly motivates them? Satanic greed? Malevolent reptilian aliens gaining the upper hand in earth’s cosmic battlefield?

  • @johnny14980
    @johnny14980 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Love how the videos are taking a heavy green turn. keep it up!!!

  • @dewiz9596
    @dewiz9596 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    So, Dave. . . explain THIS to me. . . 10 years ago, or so, there was a relationship between the price of oil and the price of gas at the pumps. . . here in Canada. If oil was US$80/barrel , the pump price was CDN 80 cents per litre. Now, the oil is what, . . US$75/ barrel, and pump price is still north of CDN$1.40/litre. Seems to me there’S some major “profit taking” going on here. . .

  • @oberstraphry
    @oberstraphry 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    As Private James Frazer of the Dad’s Army Home Guard would say: "We're doomed!"

  • @martincotterill823
    @martincotterill823 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Great video, Dave, keep up the excellent work!

    • @scottslotterbeck3796
      @scottslotterbeck3796 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The coordinated efforts to reset our entire civilization in order to prevent a “climate crisis” are an obvious and troubling example of elites grasping for more control, and less competition. And their agenda is so fatally flawed - renewables cannot power the global economy, and “owning nothing” does not make people happy, it destroys their character - that it is fair to wonder what truly motivates them? Satanic greed? Malevolent reptilian aliens gaining the upper hand in earth’s cosmic battlefield?

  • @ThatOpalGuy
    @ThatOpalGuy 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    we need to completely change the way wealth is hoarded on this planet.

    • @JZsBFF
      @JZsBFF 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That's the most sensible comment I read for now but also the most impossible to realize.
      WSF!

  • @jansasak39
    @jansasak39 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Absolutely right and possible to get off fossil fuels.
    Thank you for your videos, I very much appreciate them.

  • @bonniepoole1095
    @bonniepoole1095 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Reducing our energy needs require standardization of many things: standard cell phone recharge ports, standard bottle/ jar tops so we can reuse jars with any top, rapid phase-out of planned obsolescence (a toaster should last 20 years, not 2 years,) replacable, plug-in parts so home repair on appliances and equipment can be done. Repair, reuse, recycle.

    • @DrSmooth2000
      @DrSmooth2000 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Cuba uses industrial dishwasher to clean bottles and refill. I don't hate Communist aesthetic

    • @bonniepoole1095
      @bonniepoole1095 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      How does this comment relate to the conversation?@@DrSmooth2000

  • @stevesmith-sb2df
    @stevesmith-sb2df 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    In the USA big fossil fuel is hoping for a conservative government that will undo the policies of the democratic government. Our best hope for the future is that clean energy will be the lowest cost and capitalism will finish off fossil fuels.

    • @scottslotterbeck3796
      @scottslotterbeck3796 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      LOL.
      The coordinated efforts to reset our entire civilization in order to prevent a “climate crisis” are an obvious and troubling example of elites grasping for more control, and less competition. And their agenda is so fatally flawed - renewables cannot power the global economy, and “owning nothing” does not make people happy, it destroys their character - that it is fair to wonder what truly motivates them? Satanic greed? Malevolent reptilian aliens gaining the upper hand in earth’s cosmic battlefield?

  • @mkuc6951
    @mkuc6951 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Dave, have you listened to Simon Michaux? He says, quote; 'Both current mining production (2019) and current stated global mineral reserves (2022) cannot provide sufficient metal to manufacture only one generation of renewable technology units (EV’s, H-cells, batteries, wind turbines and solar panels).'
    I believe he is right. We're putting the cart before the horse IMO.

  • @leskuzyk2425
    @leskuzyk2425 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Excellent presentation ... referring to Tony Seba analyses on items such as the transition to EVs, most big oil companies will fail. Noting that Apple for example, not a traditional car manufacturer, is designing an EV. Bye bye Big Oil.

    • @iandavies4853
      @iandavies4853 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Apple isn’t.
      They’ve cried wolf so many times.
      Can’t even make own phones, no expertise.
      Geez, look at the struggle Tesla has to break into, then break, century old mafia.
      Booklet: how to make a 48 volt wiring system.

    • @scottslotterbeck3796
      @scottslotterbeck3796 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Bald Dave refuses to debate a real scientist, lol

  • @Neilhuny
    @Neilhuny 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I blimmin' love your videos!
    The best info and the funniest, most accurate mimicry!

  • @harry664
    @harry664 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Lovely stuff as always, see you next week!

  • @ttystikkrocks1042
    @ttystikkrocks1042 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Unless I missed it, this is the first time it extended and normally mild mannered host has cursed at anyone, and frankly I can't think of anyone more deserving.
    Well done and keep up the good work!

  • @mikemellor759
    @mikemellor759 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I’m grateful to view your weekly dose of reality. 🙏

  • @mathewroberts4834
    @mathewroberts4834 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Thanks Dave for all that you do and continuing the campaign despite the frustrations with having to tolerate the absolute monolith of shite the govt spew out whilst refusing to act.

    • @scottslotterbeck3796
      @scottslotterbeck3796 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The coordinated efforts to reset our entire civilization in order to prevent a “climate crisis” are an obvious and troubling example of elites grasping for more control, and less competition. And their agenda is so fatally flawed - renewables cannot power the global economy, and “owning nothing” does not make people happy, it destroys their character - that it is fair to wonder what truly motivates them? Satanic greed? Malevolent reptilian aliens gaining the upper hand in earth’s cosmic battlefield?

    • @JustHaveaThink
      @JustHaveaThink  8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thanks for your support Mathew. Much appreciated!

  • @willdatsun
    @willdatsun 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    limiting flying would be a good start, nobody NEEDS to fly, we survived a very long time before planes. pretty hard to capture carbon from aircraft but the whole carbon capture thing sounds pretty pie in the sky to me. All this music streaming etc instead of people downloading stuff is energy intensive, as is mining crypto, streaming 4k videos of pointless things that don't need to be in 4k or people are watching on a 5 inch screen.. all the survellence / cctv, phone masts etc think of the energy that uses, People can do little things to be greener, by just thinking, wearing an extra layer, car sharing, sourcing stuff locally, growing stuff, buying stuff that isn't in plastic. buying stuff not grown with pesticides, hormones, etc. If we don;t buy it, they can't sell it.

    • @davidwatson2399
      @davidwatson2399 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      "nobody needs to fly"
      That's bollocks.

  • @leoanthony79
    @leoanthony79 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    You didn't pull your punches, but you make no room for cynical apathy either. Much appreciated 👍

  • @aaronvallejo8220
    @aaronvallejo8220 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    If we step by step by step...we can turn economies into high insulation everywhere, large scale renewables in all regions, all substations expanded with grid batteries, roof top solar PV across housjng stocks, electric heated thermal mass floors, back and front yard gardens...throughout our cities. We can install all of these rapidly.
    This year, we renovated this mobile home with an insulated skirting. With 4x4 framing, bubble foil, 2 layers of OSB sheets, roofing membrane, free roofing steel, 4" deep and backfilled, thin film plastic on our single pane windows inside.
    So now we are super cozy and warm with 2 electric heaters and sometime the electric stove living right next to an Albertan wind farm.

    • @joemccarthy7120
      @joemccarthy7120 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Assuming you didn't get a handout from any governments, what is the payback period for your efforts?

    • @aaronvallejo8220
      @aaronvallejo8220 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @joemccarthy7120 We renovated this mobile home for the self interested reason so we did not freeze to death. The neighbours told us that our unit was freezing at the first hint of winter. So we turned a natural gas heated energy hog to electric heated. Over 5 hours the internal temperature only declined by 3C when -2C outside. No government was involved. I just scouted after work every day for free materials in the region

  • @grahamwalker2312
    @grahamwalker2312 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Thanks Dave, for telling it how it is 👍

  • @SkepticalTeacher
    @SkepticalTeacher 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    "Disciplined, data-based boffins"... haha, I just love your turn of phrase! 😂❤ It's not just what you say, it's definitely how uou say it! Never change!!❤

  • @PeterCreed-g7s
    @PeterCreed-g7s 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Tell this to the PM who is signing of licenses for new oil and gas fields like no tomorrow 😡😡😡

  • @rbphilip
    @rbphilip 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Meanwhile, here in the USA gasoline is cheaper today than any time in the last 3-4 years and the price continues to drop.

    • @scottslotterbeck3796
      @scottslotterbeck3796 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Because Biden has drained our Strategic Petroleum Reserve.

    • @ashoakwillow
      @ashoakwillow 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It's called 'Glut and Choke'; Cartels, with the active support of non-cartel oil companies, increase supply so that the price drops. This reduces investment in renewables and EV's, thereby killing off the competition. Then apply the 'choke' so that prices and profits go through the roof. Even better if you can blame it on someone, like Putin's invasion of Ukraine, when in reality most of the 'cost of living crisis' was made up of 'greedflation' and profiteering. The oil industry has been applying 'Glut and Choke' for decades if not centuries, witness the 'Robber Barons' in the USA. The are laughing at us for being suckered time and time again.

  • @J4Zonian
    @J4Zonian 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Excellent, honest & witty report. Thanks!

  • @mickinmerton8053
    @mickinmerton8053 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    I am a patreon but less than $10 ... I am a retired Brit. so that is about all I can afford. Nevertheless I am very closely aligned to your videos, I'm glad that you are there and courage you to continue :-)

    • @scottslotterbeck3796
      @scottslotterbeck3796 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Stop making bald Dave rich!
      His stock in trade is lying just to make money from sad people like you.

    • @scottslotterbeck3796
      @scottslotterbeck3796 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The coordinated efforts to reset our entire civilization in order to prevent a “climate crisis” are an obvious and troubling example of elites grasping for more control, and less competition. And their agenda is so fatally flawed - renewables cannot power the global economy, and “owning nothing” does not make people happy, it destroys their character - that it is fair to wonder what truly motivates them? Satanic greed? Malevolent reptilian aliens gaining the upper hand in earth’s cosmic battlefield?

  • @KoRntech
    @KoRntech 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Yup CCS is at best greewashing, there simply no way to meet the amount needed to be reclaimed even to match industrial output per year.

  • @alexandrabryden6143
    @alexandrabryden6143 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    This is what SNP have said. That ANY new oil field must pass net zero conditions. UK overruled.
    End Cambo and Rose bank Now!!!

    • @JanDeeKat
      @JanDeeKat 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      You're right, as they are, _any_ finite resources should be invested in sustainable resources. It's so simple, if you're not stockpiling cash out of the reach of tax, or a country's taxation, i.e., out of society's function and infrastructure.

    • @scottslotterbeck3796
      @scottslotterbeck3796 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Like living in a cave I see

    • @JanDeeKat
      @JanDeeKat 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You might,@@scottslotterbeck3796, the SNP have a vision for a future beyond finite, fossil fuels, you _will be_ that Neanderthal, if you want, it won't last! ...most of us want to evolve.

  • @joweb1320
    @joweb1320 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thanks for being honest with us!

  • @rgrocha
    @rgrocha 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    And next to me I saw Venezuela threatening Guiana. 🇧🇷

  • @richarddeese1087
    @richarddeese1087 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Thanks. I'm 58. Big oil has had my lifetime to plan for this, & to transition - & corner the market on - renewables. My heart fails to bleed. Now they MUST pay the price for their lack of vision. tavi.

    • @scottslotterbeck3796
      @scottslotterbeck3796 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You'd die without oil and plastics, fool.

    • @JZsBFF
      @JZsBFF 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      They?
      I noticed that those sheiks are pooping in golden toilets, i guess the paying part will be done by someone else.

  • @nsbd90now
    @nsbd90now 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +28

    It is amazing I've gone from one of those idealistic end-of-history-progress-is-inevitable perpetual adolescents expecting a Star Trek type Utopia to a total doomer betting on global chaos being well developed and underway by 2030.

    • @RussCR5187
      @RussCR5187 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      You're certainly not alone.

    • @sentientflower7891
      @sentientflower7891 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Global chaos has already begun and global anarchy is soon to arrive so this world is soon to end.

    • @nsbd90now
      @nsbd90now 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@erdelegy Tail end of the baby boom. Graduated college just in time for Reaganomics.

    • @nsbd90now
      @nsbd90now 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@erdelegy Oh.. Michael Dowd, recently passed before all he warned us about and tried to help us deal with positively actually came to pass. Talk about a weird existential, prophetic presence...

    • @nsbd90now
      @nsbd90now 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@erdelegy I think this is from Michael Dowd:
      Reality is my God
      Evidence is my Scripture
      The Epic of Evolution is my Creation Story
      Ecology is my Theology
      Integrity is my Spiritual Path
      Inspiring “Trust in Reality” is my Mission

  • @NathanaelHarwood
    @NathanaelHarwood 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Just an FYI that the 15% of all 'energy-related' emissions would be something like 11.25% of all emissions - given that energy accounts for 3/4 of anthropogenic emissions. Still insanely massive

  • @rileywhetstone1755
    @rileywhetstone1755 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Big money will try to control everything.

  • @rockman531
    @rockman531 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Another awesome video! Love your "beeb" comments! You always get a "thumbs up"!! Take Care. Thank You.

  • @thankyouforyourcompliance7386
    @thankyouforyourcompliance7386 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +22

    During the COVID epidemic countries (industry and citizens) accepted to different degrees a loss of human lives to keep their present way of living. There was total ignorance vs near total shutdowns. The same applies to global warming but on a much larger scale. While COVID killed millions, the climate catastrophe will kill billions and has the potential to disrupt the whole human existence. Sadly the energy industry is huge and the countries that profit most are notoriously immoral.

    • @steffen1405
      @steffen1405 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      not really countries who profit - Norway and the Emirates aside - but rather amoral businessmen and their shareholders

    • @johnfowler4820
      @johnfowler4820 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Covid did not kill millions the medicine they rolled out for it did and is still doing.

    • @exosproudmamabear558
      @exosproudmamabear558 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@steffen1405 There is no amoral businessmen there is unchecked businessmen. All capitalists will want to maximize profit, citizens want to live proper lives, politicians want power and government wants to keep everyone in check. You cant change this no matter what but you can balance things out with education , strict law applications and audits. So trying to find a moral businessmen is stupid and calling them amoral is useless

    • @buttercuptaylor7135
      @buttercuptaylor7135 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@steffen1405Amoral businesses are enabled by their Capitalist governments that put profit over humanity. Capitalists will destroy the planet for a few extra dollars.

    • @JB-kk4pv
      @JB-kk4pv 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yes, I was terrified of something that had a 99.9 % survival rate. Billions will not die from climate change, imagine how much better you would feel if you did not believe that climate change was going to cause humans to go extinct.

  • @RWBHere
    @RWBHere 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    So glad to hear that you wouldn't have the temerity to call them whatever that was which we misheard!
    Thanks Dave.

  • @SeanLumly
    @SeanLumly 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    A consequence of capital -- money above all.

  • @graemetunbridge1738
    @graemetunbridge1738 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    12:52 ' ... 40 years ago...' I think we knew enough 100 years ago to recognise that car dependent, massive energy waste, modern city/life design was a high risk strategy. - 1) the atmosphere was a very significant green house provider warming us from -30 to 18 C (1850s), 2) that doubling the CO2 would significantly warm the planet ( 1895 ) and 3) that we were heating the planet from the hotest phase of our orbital climate cycle (1920s). ie Our national governments have been sitting on this problem for ~100 years.

  • @airdad5383
    @airdad5383 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    I find that the only way I'm forced to make a change is that it hits my pocket book. I will find more efficient ways if the cost of my current life style gets too expensive. I drive a hybrid car and my house is cheap to heat but in order to move beyond that I have to be able to justify any new technology by cost savings and if fossil fuels got too expensive then I would make a change. I understand that climate change is taking place but most of us don't think that it's my responsibility and we continue on the same path until we are forced to do something about it. Politicians come and go and when one makes a change for good the next guy cancels the plan and we are back to where we started from.

    • @MrAdopado
      @MrAdopado 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I recommend occasionally just making a small move in the "right direction" even if there is no cost benefit to yourself. We can't wait for someone else to make the first move. People who can afford an expensive EV for example should go ahead and buy one. Those vehicles will become cheaper second hand options for others in 4 or 5 years time. Nobody said the transition phase would be easy.

  • @johnaduvall3861
    @johnaduvall3861 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thanks for doing so much of my energy homework for me. I downloaded two of the IEA reports you cited. Keep up the noble work!

  • @3DLL.
    @3DLL. 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Around the world, people watch 1 billion hours of TH-cam videos every day. Watching TH-cam videos produces six grams of CO2 per hour, resulting in 6 billion grams of CO2 produced globally every day JUST HAVE A THINK

    • @davidwatson2399
      @davidwatson2399 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      References and citations required

    • @zapfanzapfan
      @zapfanzapfan 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      If true, that is 6000 tonnes per day, which is nothing, or less than 0.01% of global emissions (which this year is about 35 000 000 000 tonnes).

  • @largal3909
    @largal3909 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you for the research you do to bring into the light of what is happening and who is likely responsible. Please continue doing what you do !

  • @charlesminckler2978
    @charlesminckler2978 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Change will never be easy. Fast change will always cause pain. But long term decline of fossil fuels will be just like any other industry that faded away.

    • @DoseofTruth
      @DoseofTruth 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Not exactly but it will have to be treated as an emergency

    • @danielfaben5838
      @danielfaben5838 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      except that this has been the power of the human enterprise. It has enabled everything in our industrial lives. Faded away to be replaced by what?

  • @chasinglightandtrails
    @chasinglightandtrails 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Another good video. Well done.

  • @ADobbin1
    @ADobbin1 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    If it goes down before an actual alternative infrastructure to replace it has been built then yes. Certain governments and influentials seem determined to crush them before they've bothered to replace the energy generation. The only way we do this is by mass building nuclear, fast rather than spending 2 decades on planning and approvals, as a stop gap while we figure out Power Sats.

    • @johnclements6614
      @johnclements6614 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      There are not enough resources to carry out a mass building of nuclear reactors. They are very complicated engineering structures, you need people with experience in control. At most you could increase capacity by 10% a year, if you want the work supervised and managed by experienced people.

    • @cliff9136
      @cliff9136 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@johnclements6614so 10-12 years and the problem is solved.

  • @davidgriffin8958
    @davidgriffin8958 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Those who are ‘in charge’ are as unaware of the limits to growth as bacteria in a petri dish

    • @nickcook2714
      @nickcook2714 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Nice analogy.
      However I would suggest it is probably not quite that simple, unless you are talking specifically about growth of the population.

    • @davidgriffin8958
      @davidgriffin8958 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@nickcook2714 I mean they will keeping consuming the agar until it is gone assuming that growth is infinite

  • @thomaskortvelyessy
    @thomaskortvelyessy 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    The most recent report from the scientists studying ice is very dire: thawing of the methane-laden permafrost fields appears already imminent. I do hope the IEA report has sufficiently taken that in (as far as the Tax Justice Podcast is concerned, the OECD parent Organisation is not exactly a beacon for global justice, definitely not when it comes to the tax havens where the same Oil Barons and Sheiks etc can funnel their most recent overshoot profits, She'll Oil & others)

    • @umfuturopossivel2137
      @umfuturopossivel2137 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      th-cam.com/video/OxqxeifmazA/w-d-xo.htmlsi=t72pc_F38vgiYKpL

    • @umfuturopossivel2137
      @umfuturopossivel2137 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      It is not just the permafrost, look the video that I shared above.

    • @MrAdopado
      @MrAdopado 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      It's even worse ... because the thawing of the permafrost isn't "imminent" it's already happening.

    • @scottslotterbeck3796
      @scottslotterbeck3796 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Dr. John Clausen, Nobel prize winner in physics, says "there is no climate emergency.". Look it up.

    • @MrAdopado
      @MrAdopado 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@scottslotterbeck3796 It's just possible that the thousands of other scientists who have evidence to the contrary are all wrong and Dr Clausen is right ... but that seems highly unlikely to me!

  • @johnferet8178
    @johnferet8178 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Loving these videos! Found them while researching for a paper on why biomass isn't the best renewable option & found a few useful things. THANK YOU!

  • @CS-gg5hx
    @CS-gg5hx 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Politicians have spent trillions of dollars combating CO2 and they plan to spend a hundred times more - all because atmospheric CO2 went from about 3 parts per 10,000 to 4 parts per 10,000.
    If by chance that minuscule amount of CO2 added to the atmosphere doesn’t make a difference, it won’t change the politician’s trajectory. At this point they must have absolute compliance. It’s no wonder all the agencies that support them in this endeavor are paid by them. The IPCC, NOAA, NASA, IEA, etc, all get their paychecks from the politicians. they are in perfect lockstep.
    There is so much more to climate than just CO2. When this presenter talked about a single hot day, as if CO2 induced climate change had anything to do with it, I actually had to laugh.

    • @TheDanEdwards
      @TheDanEdwards 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      "all because atmospheric CO2 went from about 3 parts per 10,000 to 4 parts per 10,000."

    • @davidwatson2399
      @davidwatson2399 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Still blubber blabbing the same bullshit

    • @Tasmantor
      @Tasmantor 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      0.006grams of arsenic per 1000grams of human is a lethal does. So for an average human 0.6grams will kill you. That's such a tiny number (an even smaller ratio than the carbon increase you site!) that it should be safe to consume by your logic.

    • @CS-gg5hx
      @CS-gg5hx 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Tasmantor Comparing CO2 in the atmosphere to a poison a human might ingest is something a 12-year-old would think of. Are you 12 years old?

    • @damienpalmer242
      @damienpalmer242 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You’re basing your opinion on an intuition that a small percentage of carbon dioxide can’t have a significant effect. There is nothing wrong with countering one intuition with another. Look up how much heat is trapped by a litre of carbon dioxide and how much has been added to the atmosphere. That’s a lot of heat and heat runs the climate.@@CS-gg5hx

  • @andressolo
    @andressolo 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thanks, mate! It's nice to see another TH-camr like me, who gives importance to not letting annoying videos appear in their content. Greetings from one of those who went to your country to steal your jobs (I only did for 2 month, I promise, I only stole food); when one did not have to get paid 45,000 € or above to live there.
    Long live Hackney! Long live Ridley Market! Pound a bowl, pound a bowl!!!

  • @ssoffshore5111
    @ssoffshore5111 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

    As someone that's interested in utilizing more solar energy, I've quickly realized PART of the problem is also regulation. The regulations both at the utility and gov level turn basic DIY solar into a complete nightmare and discourage what could so easily be significant carbon reductions by the masses.

    • @RjbigIamMe
      @RjbigIamMe 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Agreed. If we were serious the Gov would have a "solar corps"🤗🇺🇲 that would install free solar to any home where it is practical and has efficacy 😊. This would be liking giving everyone free energy😊
      It also builds resilience into our network. But things like this are fought by those wanting to make money on it, instead of helping everyone😢

    • @RjbigIamMe
      @RjbigIamMe 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Very soon almost all of our activity will be focused on climate effects. Insurance will not be profitable or predicable. Profit can't save US. Our current profit motives will fail in supplying what we need, when we need it. We must cooperate and build many routes for the items that are life dependent.

    • @sjsomething4936
      @sjsomething4936 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Those regulations are unfortunately ones recommended to the policy makers by the think tanks of the O&G industry, and are eagerly adopted since they (petrofascists) also “feather the nest” of the politicians who vote for the policies. The rapacious greed of the gas industry has never ceased, despite the recognition *by their own scientists over half a century ago* that this outcome was unavoidable if we continued to consume fossil fuels. And this refusal to curb their drive for profit has led to humans consuming far beyond the carrying capacity of the planet, on almost all levels. That rapacious greed has also led to them stifling innovation into any kind of alternative energy source, including making it impractical or expensive to utilize renewables at an individual household level via regulations. As much as I’m also pro-nuclear, that industry is also composed almost entirely of behemoth corporations who would rather have NPPs everywhere and also push restrictive policies like ridiculous feed in tariffs and other disincentives to renewable power sources.

    • @BS-detector
      @BS-detector 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I saw a video recently that recycling nuclear waste was invented in the '60s, but because of paranoia at the time, and fear based, profit driven corporate influence, our government decided to barrel it all up without much thought as to what would happen beyond 50 years. The upside is that there is a company trying to get the laws changed so it can be recycled, but like everything else it'll take an enormous amount of money. I'm not pro-nuclear, but I am pro-clean-it-up, so if we recycle the waste first while coming up with something safer, let's do it. @@sjsomething4936

    • @brucebr1037
      @brucebr1037 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Plenty electric companies decreasing net metering credits and adding connection charges to reduce the advantage of homeowner solar power generation. I think that Arizona Power was the first one to take this approach.

  • @lindax911
    @lindax911 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    @10:36 "That pathetic COP-out ...." I see what you did there! 😂😂😂

  • @rogermartinez78
    @rogermartinez78 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    We the consumers are not guilt free, we as consumers should shift away from fossil fuels as quickly as we can afford to and in that way we show what industry succeed with our pocket books!

    • @barkobama7385
      @barkobama7385 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That presupposes that options are available and not manipulated to prevent them from becoming affordable and wide spread.

    • @cliff9136
      @cliff9136 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@barkobama7385not really. Sell your car.
      Disconnect from the power grid.
      Grow your own food, or buy only locally produced food.
      Become vegan.
      Walk or cycle to work.
      Make your own clothes from wool and hemp.

  • @christopherroberts646
    @christopherroberts646 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    "... might be a bunch of..."
    *golf clap*, Sir.

  • @F1since79
    @F1since79 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    When you say ‘big oil”, you do realize that they are bit players compared to the state-owned entities, right? So when you get the Saudis, Russians and Venezuelans to all agree to stop producing oil, and China, Russia, Indian and Indonesia to stop buying it, you’ll have something. Without that, you’re just pissing into the wind.

  • @swisstony607
    @swisstony607 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    70% less oil and gas will mean food shortages & civil unrest... 😡

  • @peterjol
    @peterjol 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Almost all problems could be solved by making it financially worthwhile for people to start SHARING the jobs we would almost all AGREE we NEED people to do and working much less.......It would be the end of people always fighting against change because they are so scared of losing their jobs. They could just move over ( with provided retraining) to SHARING a job we NEED to have done, nobody would ever have to worry about unemployment.

  • @jenniferlevine5406
    @jenniferlevine5406 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Love your sensibility and your commentary! We need more voices to combat this scary nonsense. Keep it up!

  • @exosproudmamabear558
    @exosproudmamabear558 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Green energy is well behind and needs a total rework of energy grid to be used. It isnt even reliable. Fossil fuels are bad so we only left 2 thing left fussion energy and nuclear energy. First one still isnt near anywhere viable and second one costs way too much money and time to built. I think we stuck we either need to transition to small molten salt reactors or fast sodium reactors ,find viable fusion energy or find a way to properly use and distribute green energy because with our limited tech today transition in a few years almost impossible. Maybe ai can fasten the researches once we reach agi but again we do not have it either and it also gonna increase energy need. I think we stuck and all we can do try to upgrade our energy grid and put more green energy.

    • @iandavies4853
      @iandavies4853 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Do keep up.

    • @scottslotterbeck3796
      @scottslotterbeck3796 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Nuclear is the future. Clean, safe,always on. And carbon-free.
      China just put into operation the world's first 4th gen nuclear power plant.
      The Democrats WANT scarcity and high prices, so they hate nuclear.

  • @sami.ehlers
    @sami.ehlers 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thanks Dave!

  • @leonelliott5090
    @leonelliott5090 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    So many people tell us what the power structure SHOULD do, but I have yet to hear a suggested cure for selfishness and greed. Selfish, greedy men listen to you say what should be done and they laugh and call you an idealistic, naive, sucker whom they can lie to and make money off of. Do you have a solution to that problem?

  • @Mike-jl1rl
    @Mike-jl1rl 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I must admit I like the new version of the reserved English gentleman!

  • @TennesseeJed
    @TennesseeJed 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Vegemite is better, but not by much.

    • @grindupBaker
      @grindupBaker 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Rubbish. Marmite is tops.

    • @TennesseeJed
      @TennesseeJed 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@grindupBaker yeah, neither makes me feel yummy.

    • @beckylockyer2917
      @beckylockyer2917 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I prefer mine on twiglets

  • @jnorman1511
    @jnorman1511 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Your channel is a lovely blend of knowledge and depression. Thanks for everything!

  • @Jay...777
    @Jay...777 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Hanson has just published a paper detailing the catastrophic effect the removal of sulphur from ship fuel in 2015 has had. The aerosol masking effect fell across all the oceans, allowing global temps to rise substantially. The road to hell is paved with good intentions. We shouldn't remove sulphur until we know what we are doing. Same goes for all geo-engineering ideas - unforeseen consequences.

    • @REDTEDddd
      @REDTEDddd 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Wow

    • @Jay...777
      @Jay...777 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@REDTEDddd A significant rise in global temps - 0.2 degrees C if memory serves. We have kissed 1.5 goodbye so it looks like 2 degrees is now the talking point.

    • @davidwatson2399
      @davidwatson2399 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The fuel oil used in ships is massively polluting.

    • @jcgoedkoop
      @jcgoedkoop 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      😢

    • @Jay...777
      @Jay...777 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@davidwatson2399 Yes, and that is the point. The small particles of "soot" seed the formation of clouds that reflects solar radiation. Understand now?

  • @iandavies4853
    @iandavies4853 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Excellent.