If BIG OIL fails, do we all go down with it??

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 9 ธ.ค. 2023
  • The International Energy Agency just released a new paper analysing how oil and gas will dwindle in the next three decades to a small fraction of their current size, basically making non-combustible products. But that means many fossil fuel producers will fall by the wayside. If they do, will they take us down with them?
    Help support this channels independence at
    / justhaveathink
    Or with a donation via Paypal by clicking here
    www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr...
    You can also help keep my brain ticking over during the long hours of research and editing via the nice folks at BuyMeACoffee.com
    www.buymeacoffee.com/justhave...
    Video Transcripts available at our website
    www.justhaveathink.com
    NEVER FORGET : EXXON KNEW..!
    insideclimatenews.org/news/22...
    Research Links
    IEA - Oil and Gas in Net Zero Transitions
    iea.blob.core.windows.net/ass...
    Paul Martin on Green Hydrogen
    h2sciencecoalition.com/blog/c...
    Michael Barnard on Hydrogen misconceptions
    / the-world-still-measur...
    Michael Liebreich - The Hydrogen Ladder
    www.hydrogeninsight.com/polic...
    Jan Rosenow - Why hydrogen is unsuitable for home heating
    www.hydrogeninsight.com/polic...
    Just Have a Think videos on Hydrogen
    Hydrogen for home heating - bad idea
    • Heating your home with...
    The Blue Hydrogen Scam
    • Blue Hydrogen. The gre...
    Hydrogen for aviation?
    • Hydrogen jet fuel - is...
    BBC article - UAE planning oil deals at COP28
    www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-en...
    www.euronews.com/green/2023/1...
    Global Oil & Gas Exit List
    gogel.org/
    2 degree Celsius temperature spike
    phys.org/news/2023-11-global-...
    2023 on track to be hottest year on record
    www.theguardian.com/environme....
    www.carbonbrief.org/analysis-...
    Check out other TH-cam Climate Communicators
    zentouro: / zentouro
    Climate Adam: / climateadam
    Kurtis Baute: / scopeofscience
    Levi Hildebrand: / the100lh
    Simon Clark: / simonoxfphys
    Sarah Karvner: / @sarahkarver
    Rollie Williams / ClimateTown: / @climatetown
    Jack Harries: / jacksgap
    Beckisphere: / @beckisphere
    Our Changing Climate : / @ourchangingclimate
    Engineering With Rosie / engineeringwithrosie
    Ella Gilbert / drgilbz
    Planet Proof / @planetproofofficial
    Our Eden / @oureden

ความคิดเห็น • 1.2K

  • @kbmblizz1940
    @kbmblizz1940 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +364

    COP has evolved from incompetent to corrupt, as expected by us cynics.

    • @wolfgangpreier9160
      @wolfgangpreier9160 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      I've known that since i first heard about it, more than 40 years ago. It was called different but the result is the same.

    • @stickynorth
      @stickynorth 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Bingo! It's an annual farce of greenwashing and hypocrisy...

    • @stofjes4204
      @stofjes4204 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The co2 maffia is corrupt as hell you mean. There is no co2 problem at all.

    • @philipm3173
      @philipm3173 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      Secrecy is the best defense of incompetence and incompetence is the best protection of corruption.

    • @bbodyboi
      @bbodyboi 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      It’s nice being able to think “man I’m either a genius or a psychic” just by assuming/expecting the worst behavior out of humans 😂

  • @Ashleycorrie8494
    @Ashleycorrie8494 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +437

    We need to normalize a simple lifestyle and stop normalizing debt. Huge SUVs, huge houses and private universities are simply not necessary. I live within my budget and I sleep better at night knowing that if I lose my job tomorrow, ' be fine. I didn't buy the biggest house. I bought the one I could comfortably repay

    • @MichealTanner141
      @MichealTanner141 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      Yeah can being frugal be sexy please? recently mentioned that I'm frugal to a young woman and she gave me the weirdest look... Being financially responsible is looked down on

    • @PennyBurdick318
      @PennyBurdick318 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I think people should also seriously look into investing of some kind. Something that brings money back to your pocket, real estate, stocks, whatever can bring back value to their bank account rather than draining it. Obviously investing has its risks but so does just having money in depreciating assets or straight up liabilities.

    • @Seanmirrer
      @Seanmirrer 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Big house suv. Bruh you got people driving Honda civics, living in a 1 bedroom apartment and not a luxury one at that living paycheck to paycheck.
      The median rent is 2000. A lot of financial professionals especially the one I work with Samuel Peter Descovich agree that one should not spend more than 30% of their gross income on rent. That means you need to make a minimum of about $80,000. Interesting considering the median income is $54,000.

    • @GaryWinstonBrown
      @GaryWinstonBrown 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Thank you for sharing your experience and knowledge. Your coach was simple to discover online. I did my research on him before I wrote to him. He appears knowledgeable based on his online resume.

    • @RandalHebert
      @RandalHebert 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Found his website easily. It was like the first thing that came up when I searched his name. I'll surely touch basis with him to see what the best step is for me to take right now. THANK YOU!!!

  • @broncogeorge
    @broncogeorge 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +193

    When you put a fox in charge of the hen coop you shouldn’t be surprised when it eats the chickens. The COP presidency is a complete joke and his outrage speech to address the elephant in the room was pathetic.

    • @autohmae
      @autohmae 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      COOP or COP almost the same thing, right ? 🙂

    • @scottslotterbeck3796
      @scottslotterbeck3796 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      There is no climate emergency.
      Stop lying, Bald Dave.

    • @jamesreynolds5045
      @jamesreynolds5045 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      My question here is; how did an obvious Big Oil proponent (Sheik Jabber'wooky) get picked? If it smells like shit, looks like shit, it is shit!

    • @mfb424
      @mfb424 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Maybe the thought it was ”Conference of Oil Producers”? 🤷🏼 A place to sign some more of those slippery and oily deals.

    • @scottslotterbeck3796
      @scottslotterbeck3796 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The coordinated efforts to reset our entire civilization in order to prevent a “climate crisis” are an obvious and troubling example of elites grasping for more control, and less competition. And their agenda is so fatally flawed - renewables cannot power the global economy, and “owning nothing” does not make people happy, it destroys their character - that it is fair to wonder what truly motivates them? Satanic greed? Malevolent reptilian aliens gaining the upper hand in earth’s cosmic battlefield?

  • @JRattheranch
    @JRattheranch 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +283

    Don't ever stop your "prattle" Dave! It makes you unique and so engrossing in the science you're conveying! Your closing remarks were an excellent example of your previous assessment. To be enabled to laugh and assimilate your content, is priceless!

    • @a.randomjack6661
      @a.randomjack6661 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The "i" in Life stands for irony. The other 3 letters are still a mystery though 🤷‍♂

    • @RLee-zs1ds
      @RLee-zs1ds 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      L for love, F for fornicate and E for Enjoy........@@a.randomjack6661

    • @scottslotterbeck3796
      @scottslotterbeck3796 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The coordinated efforts to reset our entire civilization in order to prevent a “climate crisis” are an obvious and troubling example of elites grasping for more control, and less competition. And their agenda is so fatally flawed - renewables cannot power the global economy, and “owning nothing” does not make people happy, it destroys their character - that it is fair to wonder what truly motivates them? Satanic greed? Malevolent reptilian aliens gaining the upper hand in earth’s cosmic battlefield?

    • @beatreuteler
      @beatreuteler 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@a.randomjack6661 Love & Irony Furthers Education?

    • @a.randomjack6661
      @a.randomjack6661 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@beatreuteler Could be, could be... Took me decades to figure out the "i".... Education has to be there in some form, but "education" is vague'ish...

  • @toughenupfluffy7294
    @toughenupfluffy7294 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +190

    So mammals will ultimately be done in by dinosaurs after all? Ironic.

    • @terencefield3204
      @terencefield3204 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

      The best post in DECADES!!!!!!!!!!!

    • @steffen1405
      @steffen1405 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Mostly prehistoric forests actually, but that we'll ultimately be decimated by the nature we're eviscerating, is of no surprise. If it wasn't for that 1 asteroid, we'd never have evolved, so maybe we weren't supposed to be here at all, and radioactive dinosaurs will one day roam again, but this time over our carparks and shopping malls...

    • @Yorkshireasaurus
      @Yorkshireasaurus 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      It would be ironic if it was correct.

    • @TheHonestPeanut
      @TheHonestPeanut 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

      Well no. It's made from organic life that predates our dinosaur ancestors. Interesting none the less.

    • @ALaz502
      @ALaz502 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The VAST majority of oil is not made of dinosaurs.

  • @chinookvalley
    @chinookvalley 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +147

    My dad got out of the oil biz to protect the environment! I'm so proud that he took a stand and did what was right, and that was back in 1955! He would take the family on vacation every year just to show us the horrid effects of the oil/gas industry. I remember he would sit and cry and tell us how beautiful an area USED to be. We could have gotten oil royalties in the millions, but he said every time someone signs a check they are giving the oil industry the okay to kill the planet.

    • @imacmill
      @imacmill 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Copypasta?

    • @scottslotterbeck3796
      @scottslotterbeck3796 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Bald Dave refuses to debate a REAL climate scientist.
      Wonder why???

    • @johngrundowski3632
      @johngrundowski3632 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      My father was a coal miner - he wanted IT TO END ,,,we owe it to future generations 🌐

    • @scottslotterbeck3796
      @scottslotterbeck3796 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@johngrundowski3632 China still building coal-fired plants every two weeks.

    • @everythingmatters6308
      @everythingmatters6308 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Your father was an outstanding person. This world would be paradise if everyone was like him.

  • @leftcoaster67
    @leftcoaster67 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +39

    For the polite Englishman. :D

    • @scottslotterbeck3796
      @scottslotterbeck3796 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The Bald Lying charlatan

    • @jennyfeatherstone3574
      @jennyfeatherstone3574 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      👏👏👏

    • @scottslotterbeck3796
      @scottslotterbeck3796 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The coordinated efforts to reset our entire civilization in order to prevent a “climate crisis” are an obvious and troubling example of elites grasping for more control, and less competition. And their agenda is so fatally flawed - renewables cannot power the global economy, and “owning nothing” does not make people happy, it destroys their character - that it is fair to wonder what truly motivates them? Satanic greed? Malevolent reptilian aliens gaining the upper hand in earth’s cosmic battlefield?

    • @JZsBFF
      @JZsBFF 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      From my experience an Englishman is just as long polite as you don't try to screw him and when that happens, all hell breaks loose.

  • @karldubhe8619
    @karldubhe8619 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +95

    My dad used to work for the oil industry, he always said that burning the stuff was a crime against business and profits. Thanks for explaining why he said things like that.

    • @chinookvalley
      @chinookvalley 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +22

      My dad got out of the oil biz for just that! I'm so proud that he took a stand and did what was right, and that was back in 1955! He would take the family on vacation every year just to show us the horrid effects of the oil/gas industry. I remember he would sit and cry and tell us how beautiful an area USED to be. We could have gotten oil royalties in the millions, but he said every time someone signs a check they are giving the oil industry the okay to kill the planet.

    • @joemccarthy7120
      @joemccarthy7120 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      How is the planet being killed by the oil industry? Even NASA admits that added CO2 has made the planet a lot greener. @@chinookvalley

    • @pauleohl
      @pauleohl 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@chinookvalley Did you walk to those vacation spots?

    • @1voluntaryist
      @1voluntaryist 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      @@pauleohl What choice was offered? NONE! Govt. chooses "for the common good", i.e., the short term benefit of a few.

    • @ub59
      @ub59 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@pauleohl Oil dependency was planned. The most successful investment Big Oil ever made was to purchase politicians who made the decisions.

  • @umfuturopossivel2137
    @umfuturopossivel2137 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +92

    As a brazillian citizen, it is shamefull about how my home country is collaborating with this scrutiny. Lula allow oil exploration on ter Amazon basin. That's obscene.

    • @SeattlePioneer
      @SeattlePioneer 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    • @richardlangley90
      @richardlangley90 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      @@SeattlePioneerIf the "business" in this scenario was a petrochemical, forestry, mining or food conglomerate you would be wise to say no thanks. You can bet that these folks would be pushed onto the crappiest piece of land available (assuming they refused to move to the big cities where they would quickly find that even with a billion dollars they would not have a happy or safe life). The forests around them would be razed, the water polluted, the animals and food they rely on for their traditional food and other needs would disappear and if they got in the way of the conglomerates rented army they would be murdered.
      If these folks were smart and needed medical assistance they would be far better off (by order of magnitude) to call on Doctors without Border.

    • @SeattlePioneer
      @SeattlePioneer 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I am not AT ALL surprised that you prefer to see populations remain mired in poverty, ignorance and early death to the life YOU no doubt lead.
      That is really the environmentalist plan for humanity, in my view.

    • @nathanlevesque7812
      @nathanlevesque7812 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You are correct. It always ends up being exploitation. @@richardlangley90

    • @johgude5045
      @johgude5045 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@richardlangley90 exactly that. If you give these fossil guys a hand, they will ripp off your arm. Sad truth

  • @zombi3lif3
    @zombi3lif3 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +67

    I think some cynical oil companies managed to push Daves buttons this week 😅
    I'm with you Dave! One of the best climate channels on youtube 💪

    • @PeterTodd
      @PeterTodd 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Yes the BEEEEP factor was high this week : )

  • @juliusmazzarella9711
    @juliusmazzarella9711 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +62

    I sense your frustration Dave but hang in there, without folks like yourself to get the truth out we would really be lost. Your one of the few ecology researchers that get's the real information out to the public.

    • @5353Jumper
      @5353Jumper 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      All we need is for people like Dave to actually run for government office sometimes.

    • @REDTEDddd
      @REDTEDddd 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@5353Jumper I'm ' newish' to this channel. Has Dave ever mentioned earths weakening magnetic fields?

    • @5353Jumper
      @5353Jumper 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      @REDTEDddd yes but that topic is nearly irrelevant to the primary conversation of climate change so it does not come up much.

    • @scottslotterbeck3796
      @scottslotterbeck3796 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Bald Dave is a bald-faced liar.

    • @dougchatch
      @dougchatch 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@5353Jumper Or is it?? @REDTEDddd may have just spawned the deniers next explanation on why the planet is really heating up. :0 lol

  • @AndrewNuttallWearsPants
    @AndrewNuttallWearsPants 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +87

    We need an alternative to COP that is structured to prevent this kind of thing from happening.

    • @CRMcGee2
      @CRMcGee2 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

      Conning
      Ordinary
      People

    • @Praylak
      @Praylak 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Yes, but what is stopping big oil from hijacking them, if they haven't already?

    • @wolfgangpreier9160
      @wolfgangpreier9160 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      UNO? CCP? USA? EU?
      Currently i would prefer Matrix or Skynet if I'm honest.

    • @wolfgangpreier9160
      @wolfgangpreier9160 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@PraylakThey have. You can be totally sure bout that. Money rules the worl. Much money rules the rest.

    • @wolfgangpreier9160
      @wolfgangpreier9160 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@erdelegy Antisemits? No thank you.

  • @matthewm2139
    @matthewm2139 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

    Very appreciative of both your honesty and gentility.

  • @milestaylor7096
    @milestaylor7096 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +75

    Excellent as usual Dave, thank you. It pains me to report that the new government of NZ, where I live, has authorised fresh oil and gas exploration. We'd have been on track for the " Biggest laughing stock at COP" award until that idiot piped up with his " There is no science..." drivel and nicked the prize from us.

    • @mafarmerga
      @mafarmerga 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      So sad for you Miles.
      I visit NZ from the US every year, and with the recent revoking of the Tobacco Free Generation policy and now a reconsideration of the Treaty of Waitangi it makes wonder..What is happening to New Zealand??

    • @chromagraphphotoart
      @chromagraphphotoart 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      Lot of competition for that particular award... What about Wishy Washy Rishi Sunak's weasly explanation for why the Uk has set back the banning of petrol and diesel cars by five years 'because 'Everyone else is doing that...'

    • @gpsfinancial6988
      @gpsfinancial6988 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@mafarmerga Unfortunately the previous Government lost social license. Māori have many viewpoints (over 30% of the new cabinet is Māori), but the Government appeared to only listen to Māori extremists, which unsettled the voters. The Greens refused to even consider a Teal coalition, handing the keys to known 'drunk drivers' instead. Had the largest party (National) got an extra 1%? of the vote, most of the more unusual changes would not be happening.

    • @peterd9698
      @peterd9698 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@gpsfinancial6988 It is amazing how the left is always responsible for every batshit crazy evil BS the right enacts to blatantly enrich their donors at the expense of everyone's future.

    • @jnawk83
      @jnawk83 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      what a RCF. Luxon is an ass.

  • @mrpaul5726
    @mrpaul5726 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +93

    You are absolutely correct and it is definitely achievable and also essential but looking at the investment plans of the entire Energy Sector, Oil, Gas, Coal included the trajectory of climate change is now heading for 3c and it is looking more and more likely the transition will happen too little and too late. I wish I was wrong but the real reason I feel this is the underlying greed and selfishness we see at work in every sector of society, the immense challenge at hand is not just about CO2, Fossil Fuel and Climate Change its about a dysfunctional human family.

    • @RussCR5187
      @RussCR5187 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The world's (psychopathic) billionaire oligarchs don't believe it's possible either. That's why they are working hard on a financial crash, centralized financial control, and global totalitarian governance with them as rulers (of course; they "know best") and us as serfs. CBDC, Digital IDs, vaccine passports, advanced AI ... it's all part of the plan.

    • @tombradshaw5164
      @tombradshaw5164 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      'trajectory of climate change is now heading for 3c.' That's a very interesting philosophical statement. To what 'climate change', specifically, are you referring? Firstly, climates across the world are many and varied, and secondly, the World Meteorological Organization (WMO, but prior to 1950, the IMO), has never officially acknowledged a change of climate anywhere in the world. Climates are a function of: Latitude, Elevation, Proximity to large bodies of water, Ocean Currents, Topographical Features, Vegetation, and Prevailing and Seasonal Winds. Please explain how the combustion of fossil (hydrocarbon) fuels overrides all of the aforementioned.
      Finally, in the vicinity of the 10 busiest airports in the world by aircarft movements, the combustion of hydrocarbon fuels by air, and the associated road traffic, has not resulted in any change of climate. The same can be said if the 50 most populated cities in world, with their associated significant air and road traffic (copious quantities of hydrocarbon being combusted), hasn't brought forth any change of climate in those locations either.
      In conclusion, TELL ME WHERE the combustion of hydrocarbon fuels results in the "dreaded climate change"??

    • @mcarpenter2917
      @mcarpenter2917 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

      @@tombradshaw5164 "Please explain how the combustion of fossil (hydrocarbon) fuels overrides all of the aforementioned." -> By trapping inferred light at the surface of the earth and reducing the amount of heat that radiates into space", explained.

    • @spud95128
      @spud95128 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

      ​@@tombradshaw5164Oh come on man. Spend some time studying the basics before asking us to explain it for you. I'd recommend books and journals rather than the dark corners of the internet you seem to be getting your current arguments from

    • @mrpaul5726
      @mrpaul5726 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Nobelist, physicist, Stanford professor, Steven Chu@@tombradshaw5164

  • @doa1001
    @doa1001 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    Lmao, the bleep machine is working overtime.

  • @trueriver1950
    @trueriver1950 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +45

    Peak oil this decade is not enough. We need net zero this decade, in my opinion, in order not to overshoot significantly.

    • @davidjohnson-tq4qx
      @davidjohnson-tq4qx 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      It doesn't matter how much you save if if it makes it cheaper for the rest of the worlds populations. You have to end the production world wide or it doesn't matter. That is the challenge

    • @joemccarthy7120
      @joemccarthy7120 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Whose lives are you willing to sacrifice to achieve that goal?

    • @hansverbeek822
      @hansverbeek822 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      peakoil may already be behind us in end of 2018 or beginning of 2019.
      peakoilbarrel.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/World-1.png

    • @wolfgangpreier9160
      @wolfgangpreier9160 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      We are already overshooting. You are too late.
      End of 2100 it will be about 2.5 degrees worldwide and 7 degrees in Germany. Arctis and Siberia 10-15 degrees. End of 2200 Greenland is free and can be conquered after all the earthquakes have stopped, Canada will be overrun by south american refugeees.
      End of 2300 the seas have risen 70 meters there are less than 1 billion people left, most of civilization has broken down and antarctica is free for the first time in millions of years.
      Look what they've found: Atlantis!

    • @REDTEDddd
      @REDTEDddd 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@wolfgangpreier9160
      Mmmmmmmm :-/ Not from Co2 though.

  • @pdxyadayada
    @pdxyadayada 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +35

    I enthusiastically await your episode, each week. You’re the only TH-camr I support on Patreon (slight as it may be). Keep up the good work..

    • @scottslotterbeck3796
      @scottslotterbeck3796 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Dave is a charlatan. He's getting rich scaring children like you.
      There is no climate emergency.

    • @scottslotterbeck3796
      @scottslotterbeck3796 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The coordinated efforts to reset our entire civilization in order to prevent a “climate crisis” are an obvious and troubling example of elites grasping for more control, and less competition. And their agenda is so fatally flawed - renewables cannot power the global economy, and “owning nothing” does not make people happy, it destroys their character - that it is fair to wonder what truly motivates them? Satanic greed? Malevolent reptilian aliens gaining the upper hand in earth’s cosmic battlefield?

  • @DavidAlsh
    @DavidAlsh 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +31

    It was 41C (106F) in Sydney yesterday. I sat in my uninsulated rental apartment with my air conditioner doing the best it could as the heat leaked through every surface exposed to the outside world.
    It was crazy to look out the window and see paradise-like sunny weather which, in reality, was so inhospitable that I may as well have been living on mars.
    Sure do wish someone would take this whole climate change thing seriously, I feel like I have experienced more than my fair share of "once in a 100 years" events.

    • @bastiaan7777777
      @bastiaan7777777 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Maybe Sidney (and many other places in the world) were not ment to be inhabited (on this scale) on this location.
      "Sure do wish someone would take this whole climate change thing seriously, "
      Also, we have to things so you can keep your airco on? How about.. you turn it off..... and take this climate change thing seriously....

    • @scottslotterbeck3796
      @scottslotterbeck3796 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Gee...summer is hot. Imagine that.
      Did you know there is NO USA state with record temperatures in the 21st century?
      Hottest temperature ever recorded was in Death Valley...in 1934!!!
      Hottest temperature in Sacramento, 1924!!!

    • @philipm3173
      @philipm3173 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      It's very serious, that's why you have to ignore it perpetually.

    • @abyssmanur3965
      @abyssmanur3965 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@scottslotterbeck3796
      It's about the hottest average temperature.

    • @DrSmooth2000
      @DrSmooth2000 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      40 is when some plants, not all, quit firing on all cylinders. Close to paradise for them so long as catch rain

  • @punditgi
    @punditgi 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Hurrah for Dave! Well done by a polite and circumspect Englishman! 😊

  • @tedbomba6631
    @tedbomba6631 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

    Was anyone truly surprised that this is exactly what the UAE was planning when they proposed holding the conference in their kingdom ? I certainly hope not.

  • @andrewsmith2591
    @andrewsmith2591 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

    I agree that it is a 'cop out' for those who say that usage of coal, oil and gas is demand driven. But it is an understandable position, when viewed though the lens of global politics. The country that becomes the 'first mover' in reducing supply of coal, oil and gas will ultimately be trashing their own economy and other nations would simply pick up the slack and become richer at the same time. This is not a 'short term' proposition, it's a 'medium to long term' problem.

    • @davidmenasco5743
      @davidmenasco5743 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The world's economic, political, and communication systems are fundamentally incapable of dealing with the problem.
      The fallout from climate change, among other things, will ensure that these systems are radically transformed over the next hundred years.
      Today's elites, and activists, face the question, what kind of changes do they want to see?

    • @scottslotterbeck3796
      @scottslotterbeck3796 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The coordinated efforts to reset our entire civilization in order to prevent a “climate crisis” are an obvious and troubling example of elites grasping for more control, and less competition. And their agenda is so fatally flawed - renewables cannot power the global economy, and “owning nothing” does not make people happy, it destroys their character - that it is fair to wonder what truly motivates them? Satanic greed? Malevolent reptilian aliens gaining the upper hand in earth’s cosmic battlefield?

  • @linusvanhove482
    @linusvanhove482 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    Thank you to bring this update. It makes me hopefull again to see those clear statements to be widespread by large organisations lile the IEA

  • @LivingProcess
    @LivingProcess 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Brilliant as always 💚♻️

  • @shawnr771
    @shawnr771 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Thank you for the commentary.

  • @Stuartrusty
    @Stuartrusty 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

    Sharp and incisive sarcastic wit and this time with bleeps! As always, considerable effort and research goes into these videos, much gratitude. Those reasons are why I come back every week to your channel.

  • @achenarmyst2156
    @achenarmyst2156 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Hi Dave, a good rant is supporting mental health when facing all this bull-„beeeep“. So carry on please, it helps all of us. 😄

  • @willdatsun
    @willdatsun 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    limiting flying would be a good start, nobody NEEDS to fly, we survived a very long time before planes. pretty hard to capture carbon from aircraft but the whole carbon capture thing sounds pretty pie in the sky to me. All this music streaming etc instead of people downloading stuff is energy intensive, as is mining crypto, streaming 4k videos of pointless things that don't need to be in 4k or people are watching on a 5 inch screen.. all the survellence / cctv, phone masts etc think of the energy that uses, People can do little things to be greener, by just thinking, wearing an extra layer, car sharing, sourcing stuff locally, growing stuff, buying stuff that isn't in plastic. buying stuff not grown with pesticides, hormones, etc. If we don;t buy it, they can't sell it.

    • @davidwatson2399
      @davidwatson2399 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      "nobody needs to fly"
      That's bollocks.

  • @markdev4796
    @markdev4796 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    Would be interesting to see more into how COP is structured, how are host countries selected and sponsors and presidents selected. How do lobbyists weasle in to the event. I think the UN has some work to do to tidy this up so we don't throw the baby out with the bath water.

  • @13minutestomidnight
    @13minutestomidnight 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +28

    Hehehe I love the IEA. They always use hard science and documented facts to make a reasonable statement about the energy industry and governmental policy. Great stuff as usual.
    And yes, it is very annoying when people try to suggest the oil and gas industry can't cut down when there is ample evidence that it is necessary to do so. Unfortunately the recent war with Ukraine and Russia has left many people feeling the energy insecurity, but everyone tends to ignore the fact that longterm planning by governments can avoid such issues. If they're really concerned, nuclear is the best way to provide stable baseline power

    • @davidmenasco5743
      @davidmenasco5743 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      A technical argument for nuclear might have stood up to scrutiny 20 or 30 years ago (or might not). But at this point in time, solar and wind and battery storage would take less than half the time and cost a small fraction of the price to achieve the same energy generation.
      Wind and especially solar also have the advantage of decentralization - or at least the technical feasibility of it. This is a huge difference that is almost as important as the huge cost difference.
      In any event, time is of the essence. Solar, wind and battery storage must be built out as quickly as we - the population of the earth - can possibly build it.

    • @tomikexboii5403
      @tomikexboii5403 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@davidmenasco5743 What about countries that do not have offshore wind or solar resources? Like Scandinavia or central Europe, or most of central and northern Asia? So should we just suck the cock up for the team and be little bitches for those who do have those resources? Yeah, f**k no.

    • @howtoappearincompletely9739
      @howtoappearincompletely9739 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@davidmenasco5743 You still need baseline power. Fortunately, geothermal and hydroelectric power are good for that, but you need to build them into your argument.

    • @richardlangley90
      @richardlangley90 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@howtoappearincompletely9739 " You still need baseline power." No, you are misinformed. Do some research instead of assuming you are right without evidence.

    • @davidmenasco5743
      @davidmenasco5743 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@howtoappearincompletely9739 There are ways to get baseline from batteries.

  • @LeeHounshell
    @LeeHounshell 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    Thanks Dave! Your videos are eye opening amazing.

  • @dewiz9596
    @dewiz9596 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    So, Dave. . . explain THIS to me. . . 10 years ago, or so, there was a relationship between the price of oil and the price of gas at the pumps. . . here in Canada. If oil was US$80/barrel , the pump price was CDN 80 cents per litre. Now, the oil is what, . . US$75/ barrel, and pump price is still north of CDN$1.40/litre. Seems to me there’S some major “profit taking” going on here. . .

  • @panchostanza8712
    @panchostanza8712 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Net Zero by 2050? Not a snowball's chance in Hell

    • @scottslotterbeck3796
      @scottslotterbeck3796 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Nor should we. Drill baby drill!!!

    • @JZsBFF
      @JZsBFF 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      By that time we'll all be dead as a doughnut... and they know it! So why would THEY stop the party that they're having?

    • @MrBigbangbuzz
      @MrBigbangbuzz 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      90 percent of oil is Industry yet we are being told buying an EV will help

    • @panchostanza8712
      @panchostanza8712 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@MrBigbangbuzz
      "90 percent of oil is Industry"
      In the USA it's about 28%; transportation is 66%
      www.eia.gov/energyexplained/oil-and-petroleum-products/use-of-oil.php

    • @JZsBFF
      @JZsBFF 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@MrBigbangbuzz It's becoming more and more main stream that EV is neither the answer to climate change nor environmentally sane; but it's a great new way to make a lot of money for some people.

  • @rgrocha
    @rgrocha 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    And next to me I saw Venezuela threatening Guiana. 🇧🇷

  • @cht2162
    @cht2162 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Thanks for letting 'em have it, Dave. Big oil needs real COPS.

    • @JZsBFF
      @JZsBFF 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      They OWN the COPS !

  • @philreilly6959
    @philreilly6959 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    Great (if very worrying) video, Dave. I too don't have enough money to say anything about the COP chairman, but I totally agree with your assessment (which you clearly didn't give, for obvious reasons)!!!

    • @scottslotterbeck3796
      @scottslotterbeck3796 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The coordinated efforts to reset our entire civilization in order to prevent a “climate crisis” are an obvious and troubling example of elites grasping for more control, and less competition. And their agenda is so fatally flawed - renewables cannot power the global economy, and “owning nothing” does not make people happy, it destroys their character - that it is fair to wonder what truly motivates them? Satanic greed? Malevolent reptilian aliens gaining the upper hand in earth’s cosmic battlefield?

  • @stevesmith-sb2df
    @stevesmith-sb2df 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    In the USA big fossil fuel is hoping for a conservative government that will undo the policies of the democratic government. Our best hope for the future is that clean energy will be the lowest cost and capitalism will finish off fossil fuels.

    • @scottslotterbeck3796
      @scottslotterbeck3796 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      LOL.
      The coordinated efforts to reset our entire civilization in order to prevent a “climate crisis” are an obvious and troubling example of elites grasping for more control, and less competition. And their agenda is so fatally flawed - renewables cannot power the global economy, and “owning nothing” does not make people happy, it destroys their character - that it is fair to wonder what truly motivates them? Satanic greed? Malevolent reptilian aliens gaining the upper hand in earth’s cosmic battlefield?

  • @paulcini5849
    @paulcini5849 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Thanks for the detailed analysis. Very informative

  • @KoRntech
    @KoRntech 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Yup CCS is at best greewashing, there simply no way to meet the amount needed to be reclaimed even to match industrial output per year.

  • @bonniepoole1095
    @bonniepoole1095 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Reducing our energy needs require standardization of many things: standard cell phone recharge ports, standard bottle/ jar tops so we can reuse jars with any top, rapid phase-out of planned obsolescence (a toaster should last 20 years, not 2 years,) replacable, plug-in parts so home repair on appliances and equipment can be done. Repair, reuse, recycle.

    • @DrSmooth2000
      @DrSmooth2000 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Cuba uses industrial dishwasher to clean bottles and refill. I don't hate Communist aesthetic

    • @bonniepoole1095
      @bonniepoole1095 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      How does this comment relate to the conversation?@@DrSmooth2000

  • @jansasak39
    @jansasak39 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Absolutely right and possible to get off fossil fuels.
    Thank you for your videos, I very much appreciate them.

  • @leskuzyk2425
    @leskuzyk2425 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Excellent presentation ... referring to Tony Seba analyses on items such as the transition to EVs, most big oil companies will fail. Noting that Apple for example, not a traditional car manufacturer, is designing an EV. Bye bye Big Oil.

    • @iandavies4853
      @iandavies4853 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Apple isn’t.
      They’ve cried wolf so many times.
      Can’t even make own phones, no expertise.
      Geez, look at the struggle Tesla has to break into, then break, century old mafia.
      Booklet: how to make a 48 volt wiring system.

    • @scottslotterbeck3796
      @scottslotterbeck3796 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Bald Dave refuses to debate a real scientist, lol

  • @Mike-jl1rl
    @Mike-jl1rl 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I must admit I like the new version of the reserved English gentleman!

  • @richarddeese1087
    @richarddeese1087 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Thanks. I'm 58. Big oil has had my lifetime to plan for this, & to transition - & corner the market on - renewables. My heart fails to bleed. Now they MUST pay the price for their lack of vision. tavi.

    • @scottslotterbeck3796
      @scottslotterbeck3796 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You'd die without oil and plastics, fool.

    • @JZsBFF
      @JZsBFF 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      They?
      I noticed that those sheiks are pooping in golden toilets, i guess the paying part will be done by someone else.

  • @SeanLumly
    @SeanLumly 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    A consequence of capital -- money above all.

  • @airdad5383
    @airdad5383 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    I find that the only way I'm forced to make a change is that it hits my pocket book. I will find more efficient ways if the cost of my current life style gets too expensive. I drive a hybrid car and my house is cheap to heat but in order to move beyond that I have to be able to justify any new technology by cost savings and if fossil fuels got too expensive then I would make a change. I understand that climate change is taking place but most of us don't think that it's my responsibility and we continue on the same path until we are forced to do something about it. Politicians come and go and when one makes a change for good the next guy cancels the plan and we are back to where we started from.

    • @MrAdopado
      @MrAdopado 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I recommend occasionally just making a small move in the "right direction" even if there is no cost benefit to yourself. We can't wait for someone else to make the first move. People who can afford an expensive EV for example should go ahead and buy one. Those vehicles will become cheaper second hand options for others in 4 or 5 years time. Nobody said the transition phase would be easy.

  • @oberstraphry
    @oberstraphry 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    As Private James Frazer of the Dad’s Army Home Guard would say: "We're doomed!"

  • @mickinmerton8053
    @mickinmerton8053 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    I am a patreon but less than $10 ... I am a retired Brit. so that is about all I can afford. Nevertheless I am very closely aligned to your videos, I'm glad that you are there and courage you to continue :-)

    • @scottslotterbeck3796
      @scottslotterbeck3796 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Stop making bald Dave rich!
      His stock in trade is lying just to make money from sad people like you.

    • @scottslotterbeck3796
      @scottslotterbeck3796 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The coordinated efforts to reset our entire civilization in order to prevent a “climate crisis” are an obvious and troubling example of elites grasping for more control, and less competition. And their agenda is so fatally flawed - renewables cannot power the global economy, and “owning nothing” does not make people happy, it destroys their character - that it is fair to wonder what truly motivates them? Satanic greed? Malevolent reptilian aliens gaining the upper hand in earth’s cosmic battlefield?

  • @SkepticalTeacher
    @SkepticalTeacher 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    "Disciplined, data-based boffins"... haha, I just love your turn of phrase! 😂❤ It's not just what you say, it's definitely how uou say it! Never change!!❤

  • @alexandrabryden6143
    @alexandrabryden6143 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    This is what SNP have said. That ANY new oil field must pass net zero conditions. UK overruled.
    End Cambo and Rose bank Now!!!

    • @JeffGatto
      @JeffGatto 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      You're right, as they are, _any_ finite resources should be invested in sustainable resources. It's so simple, if you're not stockpiling cash out of the reach of tax, or a country's taxation, i.e., out of society's function and infrastructure.

    • @scottslotterbeck3796
      @scottslotterbeck3796 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Like living in a cave I see

    • @JeffGatto
      @JeffGatto 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You might,@@scottslotterbeck3796, the SNP have a vision for a future beyond finite, fossil fuels, you _will be_ that Neanderthal, if you want, it won't last! ...most of us want to evolve.

  • @ttystikkrocks1042
    @ttystikkrocks1042 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Unless I missed it, this is the first time it extended and normally mild mannered host has cursed at anyone, and frankly I can't think of anyone more deserving.
    Well done and keep up the good work!

  • @aaronvallejo8220
    @aaronvallejo8220 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    If we step by step by step...we can turn economies into high insulation everywhere, large scale renewables in all regions, all substations expanded with grid batteries, roof top solar PV across housjng stocks, electric heated thermal mass floors, back and front yard gardens...throughout our cities. We can install all of these rapidly.
    This year, we renovated this mobile home with an insulated skirting. With 4x4 framing, bubble foil, 2 layers of OSB sheets, roofing membrane, free roofing steel, 4" deep and backfilled, thin film plastic on our single pane windows inside.
    So now we are super cozy and warm with 2 electric heaters and sometime the electric stove living right next to an Albertan wind farm.

    • @joemccarthy7120
      @joemccarthy7120 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Assuming you didn't get a handout from any governments, what is the payback period for your efforts?

    • @aaronvallejo8220
      @aaronvallejo8220 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @joemccarthy7120 We renovated this mobile home for the self interested reason so we did not freeze to death. The neighbours told us that our unit was freezing at the first hint of winter. So we turned a natural gas heated energy hog to electric heated. Over 5 hours the internal temperature only declined by 3C when -2C outside. No government was involved. I just scouted after work every day for free materials in the region

  • @rbphilip
    @rbphilip 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Meanwhile, here in the USA gasoline is cheaper today than any time in the last 3-4 years and the price continues to drop.

    • @scottslotterbeck3796
      @scottslotterbeck3796 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Because Biden has drained our Strategic Petroleum Reserve.

    • @ashoakwillow
      @ashoakwillow 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It's called 'Glut and Choke'; Cartels, with the active support of non-cartel oil companies, increase supply so that the price drops. This reduces investment in renewables and EV's, thereby killing off the competition. Then apply the 'choke' so that prices and profits go through the roof. Even better if you can blame it on someone, like Putin's invasion of Ukraine, when in reality most of the 'cost of living crisis' was made up of 'greedflation' and profiteering. The oil industry has been applying 'Glut and Choke' for decades if not centuries, witness the 'Robber Barons' in the USA. The are laughing at us for being suckered time and time again.

  • @harry664
    @harry664 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Lovely stuff as always, see you next week!

  • @in-cite
    @in-cite 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Thank you for your courage and truthfulness.

  • @Neilhuny
    @Neilhuny 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I blimmin' love your videos!
    The best info and the funniest, most accurate mimicry!

  • @mikemellor759
    @mikemellor759 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I’m grateful to view your weekly dose of reality. 🙏

  • @rileywhetstone1755
    @rileywhetstone1755 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Big money will try to control everything.

  • @simonwest9514
    @simonwest9514 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Thanks for mentioning pension funds and banks. Asking your pension fund provider to move your own fund out of anything fossil fuel related is easy enough for those of us lucky enough to have one. It won't happen overnight, but asking is the first step to getting an ethical pension.

  • @mkuc6951
    @mkuc6951 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Dave, have you listened to Simon Michaux? He says, quote; 'Both current mining production (2019) and current stated global mineral reserves (2022) cannot provide sufficient metal to manufacture only one generation of renewable technology units (EV’s, H-cells, batteries, wind turbines and solar panels).'
    I believe he is right. We're putting the cart before the horse IMO.

  • @exosproudmamabear558
    @exosproudmamabear558 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Green energy is well behind and needs a total rework of energy grid to be used. It isnt even reliable. Fossil fuels are bad so we only left 2 thing left fussion energy and nuclear energy. First one still isnt near anywhere viable and second one costs way too much money and time to built. I think we stuck we either need to transition to small molten salt reactors or fast sodium reactors ,find viable fusion energy or find a way to properly use and distribute green energy because with our limited tech today transition in a few years almost impossible. Maybe ai can fasten the researches once we reach agi but again we do not have it either and it also gonna increase energy need. I think we stuck and all we can do try to upgrade our energy grid and put more green energy.

    • @iandavies4853
      @iandavies4853 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Do keep up.

    • @scottslotterbeck3796
      @scottslotterbeck3796 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Nuclear is the future. Clean, safe,always on. And carbon-free.
      China just put into operation the world's first 4th gen nuclear power plant.
      The Democrats WANT scarcity and high prices, so they hate nuclear.

  • @F1since79
    @F1since79 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    When you say ‘big oil”, you do realize that they are bit players compared to the state-owned entities, right? So when you get the Saudis, Russians and Venezuelans to all agree to stop producing oil, and China, Russia, Indian and Indonesia to stop buying it, you’ll have something. Without that, you’re just pissing into the wind.

  • @johnny14980
    @johnny14980 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Love how the videos are taking a heavy green turn. keep it up!!!

  • @mathewroberts4834
    @mathewroberts4834 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Thanks Dave for all that you do and continuing the campaign despite the frustrations with having to tolerate the absolute monolith of shite the govt spew out whilst refusing to act.

    • @scottslotterbeck3796
      @scottslotterbeck3796 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The coordinated efforts to reset our entire civilization in order to prevent a “climate crisis” are an obvious and troubling example of elites grasping for more control, and less competition. And their agenda is so fatally flawed - renewables cannot power the global economy, and “owning nothing” does not make people happy, it destroys their character - that it is fair to wonder what truly motivates them? Satanic greed? Malevolent reptilian aliens gaining the upper hand in earth’s cosmic battlefield?

    • @JustHaveaThink
      @JustHaveaThink  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thanks for your support Mathew. Much appreciated!

  • @martincotterill823
    @martincotterill823 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Great video, Dave, keep up the excellent work!

    • @scottslotterbeck3796
      @scottslotterbeck3796 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The coordinated efforts to reset our entire civilization in order to prevent a “climate crisis” are an obvious and troubling example of elites grasping for more control, and less competition. And their agenda is so fatally flawed - renewables cannot power the global economy, and “owning nothing” does not make people happy, it destroys their character - that it is fair to wonder what truly motivates them? Satanic greed? Malevolent reptilian aliens gaining the upper hand in earth’s cosmic battlefield?

  • @ADobbin1
    @ADobbin1 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    If it goes down before an actual alternative infrastructure to replace it has been built then yes. Certain governments and influentials seem determined to crush them before they've bothered to replace the energy generation. The only way we do this is by mass building nuclear, fast rather than spending 2 decades on planning and approvals, as a stop gap while we figure out Power Sats.

    • @johnclements6614
      @johnclements6614 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      There are not enough resources to carry out a mass building of nuclear reactors. They are very complicated engineering structures, you need people with experience in control. At most you could increase capacity by 10% a year, if you want the work supervised and managed by experienced people.

    • @cliff9136
      @cliff9136 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@johnclements6614so 10-12 years and the problem is solved.

  • @rockman531
    @rockman531 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Another awesome video! Love your "beeb" comments! You always get a "thumbs up"!! Take Care. Thank You.

  • @hughwaller6789
    @hughwaller6789 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Go Dave go! You are saying what needs to be said and more power to you.

  • @nsbd90now
    @nsbd90now 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +28

    It is amazing I've gone from one of those idealistic end-of-history-progress-is-inevitable perpetual adolescents expecting a Star Trek type Utopia to a total doomer betting on global chaos being well developed and underway by 2030.

    • @RussCR5187
      @RussCR5187 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      You're certainly not alone.

    • @sentientflower7891
      @sentientflower7891 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Global chaos has already begun and global anarchy is soon to arrive so this world is soon to end.

    • @nsbd90now
      @nsbd90now 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@erdelegy Tail end of the baby boom. Graduated college just in time for Reaganomics.

    • @nsbd90now
      @nsbd90now 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@erdelegy Oh.. Michael Dowd, recently passed before all he warned us about and tried to help us deal with positively actually came to pass. Talk about a weird existential, prophetic presence...

    • @nsbd90now
      @nsbd90now 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@erdelegy I think this is from Michael Dowd:
      Reality is my God
      Evidence is my Scripture
      The Epic of Evolution is my Creation Story
      Ecology is my Theology
      Integrity is my Spiritual Path
      Inspiring “Trust in Reality” is my Mission

  • @charlesminckler2978
    @charlesminckler2978 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Change will never be easy. Fast change will always cause pain. But long term decline of fossil fuels will be just like any other industry that faded away.

    • @DoseofTruth
      @DoseofTruth 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Not exactly but it will have to be treated as an emergency

    • @danielfaben5838
      @danielfaben5838 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      except that this has been the power of the human enterprise. It has enabled everything in our industrial lives. Faded away to be replaced by what?

  • @leoanthony79
    @leoanthony79 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    You didn't pull your punches, but you make no room for cynical apathy either. Much appreciated 👍

  • @johnaduvall3861
    @johnaduvall3861 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thanks for doing so much of my energy homework for me. I downloaded two of the IEA reports you cited. Keep up the noble work!

  • @thomaskortvelyessy
    @thomaskortvelyessy 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    The most recent report from the scientists studying ice is very dire: thawing of the methane-laden permafrost fields appears already imminent. I do hope the IEA report has sufficiently taken that in (as far as the Tax Justice Podcast is concerned, the OECD parent Organisation is not exactly a beacon for global justice, definitely not when it comes to the tax havens where the same Oil Barons and Sheiks etc can funnel their most recent overshoot profits, She'll Oil & others)

    • @umfuturopossivel2137
      @umfuturopossivel2137 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      th-cam.com/video/OxqxeifmazA/w-d-xo.htmlsi=t72pc_F38vgiYKpL

    • @umfuturopossivel2137
      @umfuturopossivel2137 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      It is not just the permafrost, look the video that I shared above.

    • @MrAdopado
      @MrAdopado 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      It's even worse ... because the thawing of the permafrost isn't "imminent" it's already happening.

    • @scottslotterbeck3796
      @scottslotterbeck3796 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Dr. John Clausen, Nobel prize winner in physics, says "there is no climate emergency.". Look it up.

    • @MrAdopado
      @MrAdopado 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@scottslotterbeck3796 It's just possible that the thousands of other scientists who have evidence to the contrary are all wrong and Dr Clausen is right ... but that seems highly unlikely to me!

  • @rogermartinez78
    @rogermartinez78 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    We the consumers are not guilt free, we as consumers should shift away from fossil fuels as quickly as we can afford to and in that way we show what industry succeed with our pocket books!

    • @barkobama7385
      @barkobama7385 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That presupposes that options are available and not manipulated to prevent them from becoming affordable and wide spread.

    • @cliff9136
      @cliff9136 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@barkobama7385not really. Sell your car.
      Disconnect from the power grid.
      Grow your own food, or buy only locally produced food.
      Become vegan.
      Walk or cycle to work.
      Make your own clothes from wool and hemp.

  • @johnferet8178
    @johnferet8178 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Loving these videos! Found them while researching for a paper on why biomass isn't the best renewable option & found a few useful things. THANK YOU!

  • @ksairman
    @ksairman 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    thank you, great info.

  • @peterjol
    @peterjol 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Almost all problems could be solved by making it financially worthwhile for people to start SHARING the jobs we would almost all AGREE we NEED people to do and working much less.......It would be the end of people always fighting against change because they are so scared of losing their jobs. They could just move over ( with provided retraining) to SHARING a job we NEED to have done, nobody would ever have to worry about unemployment.

  • @3DLL.
    @3DLL. 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Around the world, people watch 1 billion hours of TH-cam videos every day. Watching TH-cam videos produces six grams of CO2 per hour, resulting in 6 billion grams of CO2 produced globally every day JUST HAVE A THINK

    • @davidwatson2399
      @davidwatson2399 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      References and citations required

    • @zapfanzapfan
      @zapfanzapfan 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      If true, that is 6000 tonnes per day, which is nothing, or less than 0.01% of global emissions (which this year is about 35 000 000 000 tonnes).

  • @largal3909
    @largal3909 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you for the research you do to bring into the light of what is happening and who is likely responsible. Please continue doing what you do !

  • @grahamwalker2312
    @grahamwalker2312 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Thanks Dave, for telling it how it is 👍

  • @ssoffshore5111
    @ssoffshore5111 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

    As someone that's interested in utilizing more solar energy, I've quickly realized PART of the problem is also regulation. The regulations both at the utility and gov level turn basic DIY solar into a complete nightmare and discourage what could so easily be significant carbon reductions by the masses.

    • @iamme9138
      @iamme9138 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Agreed. If we were serious the Gov would have a "solar corps"🤗🇺🇲 that would install free solar to any home where it is practical and has efficacy 😊. This would be liking giving everyone free energy😊
      It also builds resilience into our network. But things like this are fought by those wanting to make money on it, instead of helping everyone😢

    • @iamme9138
      @iamme9138 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Very soon almost all of our activity will be focused on climate effects. Insurance will not be profitable or predicable. Profit can't save US. Our current profit motives will fail in supplying what we need, when we need it. We must cooperate and build many routes for the items that are life dependent.

    • @sjsomething4936
      @sjsomething4936 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Those regulations are unfortunately ones recommended to the policy makers by the think tanks of the O&G industry, and are eagerly adopted since they (petrofascists) also “feather the nest” of the politicians who vote for the policies. The rapacious greed of the gas industry has never ceased, despite the recognition *by their own scientists over half a century ago* that this outcome was unavoidable if we continued to consume fossil fuels. And this refusal to curb their drive for profit has led to humans consuming far beyond the carrying capacity of the planet, on almost all levels. That rapacious greed has also led to them stifling innovation into any kind of alternative energy source, including making it impractical or expensive to utilize renewables at an individual household level via regulations. As much as I’m also pro-nuclear, that industry is also composed almost entirely of behemoth corporations who would rather have NPPs everywhere and also push restrictive policies like ridiculous feed in tariffs and other disincentives to renewable power sources.

    • @BS-detector
      @BS-detector 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I saw a video recently that recycling nuclear waste was invented in the '60s, but because of paranoia at the time, and fear based, profit driven corporate influence, our government decided to barrel it all up without much thought as to what would happen beyond 50 years. The upside is that there is a company trying to get the laws changed so it can be recycled, but like everything else it'll take an enormous amount of money. I'm not pro-nuclear, but I am pro-clean-it-up, so if we recycle the waste first while coming up with something safer, let's do it. @@sjsomething4936

    • @brucebr1037
      @brucebr1037 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Plenty electric companies decreasing net metering credits and adding connection charges to reduce the advantage of homeowner solar power generation. I think that Arizona Power was the first one to take this approach.

  • @leonelliott5090
    @leonelliott5090 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    So many people tell us what the power structure SHOULD do, but I have yet to hear a suggested cure for selfishness and greed. Selfish, greedy men listen to you say what should be done and they laugh and call you an idealistic, naive, sucker whom they can lie to and make money off of. Do you have a solution to that problem?

  • @graemetunbridge1738
    @graemetunbridge1738 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    12:52 ' ... 40 years ago...' I think we knew enough 100 years ago to recognise that car dependent, massive energy waste, modern city/life design was a high risk strategy. - 1) the atmosphere was a very significant green house provider warming us from -30 to 18 C (1850s), 2) that doubling the CO2 would significantly warm the planet ( 1895 ) and 3) that we were heating the planet from the hotest phase of our orbital climate cycle (1920s). ie Our national governments have been sitting on this problem for ~100 years.

  • @franche7408
    @franche7408 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    So well said... so enjoyable to watch... and yet so scary!!

  • @CS-gg5hx
    @CS-gg5hx 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Politicians have spent trillions of dollars combating CO2 and they plan to spend a hundred times more - all because atmospheric CO2 went from about 3 parts per 10,000 to 4 parts per 10,000.
    If by chance that minuscule amount of CO2 added to the atmosphere doesn’t make a difference, it won’t change the politician’s trajectory. At this point they must have absolute compliance. It’s no wonder all the agencies that support them in this endeavor are paid by them. The IPCC, NOAA, NASA, IEA, etc, all get their paychecks from the politicians. they are in perfect lockstep.
    There is so much more to climate than just CO2. When this presenter talked about a single hot day, as if CO2 induced climate change had anything to do with it, I actually had to laugh.

    • @TheDanEdwards
      @TheDanEdwards 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      "all because atmospheric CO2 went from about 3 parts per 10,000 to 4 parts per 10,000."

    • @davidwatson2399
      @davidwatson2399 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Still blubber blabbing the same bullshit

    • @Tasmantor
      @Tasmantor 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      0.006grams of arsenic per 1000grams of human is a lethal does. So for an average human 0.6grams will kill you. That's such a tiny number (an even smaller ratio than the carbon increase you site!) that it should be safe to consume by your logic.

    • @CS-gg5hx
      @CS-gg5hx 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Tasmantor Comparing CO2 in the atmosphere to a poison a human might ingest is something a 12-year-old would think of. Are you 12 years old?

    • @damienpalmer242
      @damienpalmer242 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You’re basing your opinion on an intuition that a small percentage of carbon dioxide can’t have a significant effect. There is nothing wrong with countering one intuition with another. Look up how much heat is trapped by a litre of carbon dioxide and how much has been added to the atmosphere. That’s a lot of heat and heat runs the climate.@@CS-gg5hx

  • @TennesseeJed
    @TennesseeJed 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Vegemite is better, but not by much.

    • @grindupBaker
      @grindupBaker 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Rubbish. Marmite is tops.

    • @TennesseeJed
      @TennesseeJed 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@grindupBaker yeah, neither makes me feel yummy.

    • @beckylockyer2917
      @beckylockyer2917 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I prefer mine on twiglets

  • @RWBHere
    @RWBHere 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    So glad to hear that you wouldn't have the temerity to call them whatever that was which we misheard!
    Thanks Dave.

  • @jenniferlevine5406
    @jenniferlevine5406 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Love your sensibility and your commentary! We need more voices to combat this scary nonsense. Keep it up!

  • @thankyouforyourcompliance7386
    @thankyouforyourcompliance7386 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +22

    During the COVID epidemic countries (industry and citizens) accepted to different degrees a loss of human lives to keep their present way of living. There was total ignorance vs near total shutdowns. The same applies to global warming but on a much larger scale. While COVID killed millions, the climate catastrophe will kill billions and has the potential to disrupt the whole human existence. Sadly the energy industry is huge and the countries that profit most are notoriously immoral.

    • @steffen1405
      @steffen1405 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      not really countries who profit - Norway and the Emirates aside - but rather amoral businessmen and their shareholders

    • @johnfowler4820
      @johnfowler4820 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Covid did not kill millions the medicine they rolled out for it did and is still doing.

    • @exosproudmamabear558
      @exosproudmamabear558 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@steffen1405 There is no amoral businessmen there is unchecked businessmen. All capitalists will want to maximize profit, citizens want to live proper lives, politicians want power and government wants to keep everyone in check. You cant change this no matter what but you can balance things out with education , strict law applications and audits. So trying to find a moral businessmen is stupid and calling them amoral is useless

    • @buttercuptaylor7135
      @buttercuptaylor7135 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@steffen1405Amoral businesses are enabled by their Capitalist governments that put profit over humanity. Capitalists will destroy the planet for a few extra dollars.

    • @JB-kk4pv
      @JB-kk4pv 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yes, I was terrified of something that had a 99.9 % survival rate. Billions will not die from climate change, imagine how much better you would feel if you did not believe that climate change was going to cause humans to go extinct.

  • @wotireckon
    @wotireckon 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    The point needs to be made that every country that doesn't jump on "the green bandwagon" will fall behind other countries that do. Demand for fossil fuels is falling and will continue to fall at an ever increasing rate: fossil fuel outputs will fall with demand, reducing economies of scale and pushing prices up.The transition is already well underway. He who hesitates is lost.

    • @rjbiker66
      @rjbiker66 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Where did you hear that demand for fossil fuels is decreasing? What do you think India and China are going to feed the new coal fired power stations with?

    • @wotireckon
      @wotireckon 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@rjbiker66Solar and wind are the cheapest form of electricity generation ever. EV sales are accelerating. (Tesla model Y is the best selling car globally.) Geopolitical events and market manipulation cause massive spikes in gas and oil prices, holding us all to ransom. Cop 28 has agreed that we need to transition away from fossil fuels. The message could not be clearer and the countries who bury their heads in the sand will look like idiots in 10 years time. Agreed, we've yet to hit peak fossil fuel production, but that time will come, soon.

  • @grahamcastle8189
    @grahamcastle8189 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Thank you for an informative and emotive video. You may have missed this in the news but Scotlands only oil refinery in Grangemouth is closing and the reason given is a lack of demand for its products and dwindling North Sea oil production.

  • @sami.ehlers
    @sami.ehlers 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thanks Dave!

  • @Jay...777
    @Jay...777 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Hanson has just published a paper detailing the catastrophic effect the removal of sulphur from ship fuel in 2015 has had. The aerosol masking effect fell across all the oceans, allowing global temps to rise substantially. The road to hell is paved with good intentions. We shouldn't remove sulphur until we know what we are doing. Same goes for all geo-engineering ideas - unforeseen consequences.

    • @REDTEDddd
      @REDTEDddd 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Wow

    • @Jay...777
      @Jay...777 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@REDTEDddd A significant rise in global temps - 0.2 degrees C if memory serves. We have kissed 1.5 goodbye so it looks like 2 degrees is now the talking point.

    • @davidwatson2399
      @davidwatson2399 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The fuel oil used in ships is massively polluting.

    • @jcgoedkoop
      @jcgoedkoop 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      😢

    • @Jay...777
      @Jay...777 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@davidwatson2399 Yes, and that is the point. The small particles of "soot" seed the formation of clouds that reflects solar radiation. Understand now?

  • @Talon771
    @Talon771 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Random comment for channel interaction.

  • @dominicmccrimmon
    @dominicmccrimmon 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    It took the entire energy output of humanity to fill up the sky. That's why there could never be enough energy to pull the combustion gasses back out of the sky.

  • @seanbell6371
    @seanbell6371 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Another good video. Well done.

  • @manoo422
    @manoo422 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    "the worst effects of El Nino are due to hit in 2024..." So we might actually get a summer next year, that will be something to look forward to for a change.
    Hardly something that needs 'solving' though...

    • @scottslotterbeck3796
      @scottslotterbeck3796 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      LOL.

    • @manoo422
      @manoo422 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@scottslotterbeck3796 Its certainly a laughable suggestion.

  • @davidblair9877
    @davidblair9877 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    If big oil collapses, it will be because it has become too economically marginalized to support itself, which is academícese for saying that it will no longer be relevant for the majority of the population.

  • @marcdefaoite
    @marcdefaoite 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thanks Dave

  • @timwedemeyer
    @timwedemeyer 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Love the beeps. Keep more coming in future.