@@MichaelAChristian1 Yeah, I have a ESV. they remove Matthew 18:11 and Acts 8:37 and changes Philippians 2:6 and so much more. that's why I stick to the KJV or NKJV.
Not a bad choice. I like it more than the KJV, but I still prefer my ESV with Deuterocanon for longer readings. Of course for verses the Douay-Rheims 1899 obviously wins
Well now that depends on how you define the word "best." Neither book is historically accurate and both are treated as if every sentence is the word of god even though we know that is not the case. Its sad really.
You need to understand what the translations actually are, compare them they dont contradict eachother. English has been changing generation after generation just consider the way your grandfather talks compared to your child. The translations are for people to understand what they are reading and really a speed run to hell?? I didnt know you held judgment for that... remember this that Jesus tells us that the level of judgment you hold onto others will be held onto you @@kalwallingford7039
@@javierdelgado1554 maybe because we can better translate it now and the kjv is over 400 years old . Kjv isn't he most accurate english translation. It was just extremely important in the time It😊😊 was made
LOL it can't be ESV when they disqualify themselves with this nonsense: "Your desire shall be contrary to your husband, but he shall rule over you." Haha congrats ESV you played yourself!
That’s a misleading argument. Other versions DO NOT omit verses; the translation is based on ancient manuscripts that never had them to begin with. One could just as easily argue that the KJV added extra verses that were never there.
@@timwildsmith I 100% disagree, I understand that they are using a handful of older manuscripts that hardly any early church father ever quoted from. Manuscripts that were found with the Catholics that came from an area that was known to produce gnostics. Gods word clearly says that he will preserve his word, to make the claim that the early church that used the majority text were using the wrong texts for a thousand years were using the wrong texts is the same as calling God a liar. My God is not a God of confusion. The alexandrian texts should not be trusted,
The texts are about 95% identical, so wouldn't you argument mean that you can't trust the TR either? And of the places where they differ, what significant doctrinal issues are concerned? None. This is why the KJV-only TR argument confounds me.
There is no Orthodox translation unless you are talking about the St. Athanasius Academy LXX and the 1904 NT-but sadly, there is no complete Orthodox Bible in English.
Also, it isn’t translated from Aramaic-the NT and OT utilize Greek, and the ROC uses a mix of Messianic translations of the OT in many Russian translations.
Call upon the Lord Jesus Christ and thou shalt be Saved! The King James Bible is Perfect. The "esv" is corrupt. It makes countless changes. From Genesis onward.
@MichaelAChristian1 I study quite a bit and am familiar with the various approaches used by scholars and translators when it comes to making decisions about how to translate the texts. Also, the texts themselves do not entirely stay uniform or constant, text to text. Some passages that were found among the documents leading to the KJV, for instance, don't appear in works later discovered that date prior to those used to support the KJV. An example is the woman found in adultery, from which passage the famous "he who is without sin, cast the first stone", is not found in earlier texts.
@@sanskritprayers That's just a lie they made up in 1800s. Even Wikipedia admits thus," The Latin Vulgate Gospel of John, produced by Jerome in 383, was based on the Greek manuscripts which Jerome considered ancient exemplars at that time and which contained the passage. Jerome, writing around 417, reports that the Pericope Adulterae was found in its usual place in "many Greek and Latin manuscripts" in Rome and the Latin West. This is confirmed by some Latin Fathers of the 300s and 400s, including Ambrose of Milan, and Augustine of Hippo. The latter claimed that the passage may have been improperly excluded from some manuscripts in order to avoid the impression that Christ had sanctioned adultery: Certain persons of little faith, or rather enemies of the true faith, fearing, I suppose, lest their wives should be given impunity in sinning, removed from their manuscripts the Lord's act of forgiveness toward the adulteress, as if he who had said, Sin no more, had granted permission to sin.[b]"
As a Received Text Bible believer who's passed from OAO through KJVO to simply taking each translation for what they're worth, I find this to be hilarious! I think that you should consider expanding this to "If Action Movie Characters Were Bibles"... if you're up for the onslaught of responses! 🤪
![[Live] : ONE FIGHT NIGHT 24 วันนี้!! “จาร์เร็ด vs กุสตาโว”](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/ENNA-fsT67c/mqdefault.jpg)
English Standard Version for the win, but the KJV is near and dear and its written beauty is hard to beat.
We all know who’s in charge 🤣
Now that one is FUNNY!!
🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂
😉
Extra Starlord Version?
King Jotann Version?
This is freaking great!
😉
King Jesus version is the best though in all seriousness
The "esv" is corrupt. It even removed things from Genesis 1 onward.
@@MichaelAChristian1 Yeah, I have a ESV. they remove Matthew 18:11 and Acts 8:37 and changes Philippians 2:6 and so much more. that's why I stick to the KJV or NKJV.
Douey Rheims
Not a bad choice. I like it more than the KJV, but I still prefer my ESV with Deuterocanon for longer readings. Of course for verses the Douay-Rheims 1899 obviously wins
Thank you for sharing this. I am very fond of the Duay-Rheims. Not my first or second choice, but it's very close in my affection to KJV.
This is so funny😂😂
Love it! Made me giggle
😉
@@timwildsmith have an amazing day
You too!
@@timwildsmith thanks. Take care
Best one
😉
Well now that depends on how you define the word "best." Neither book is historically accurate and both are treated as if every sentence is the word of god even though we know that is not the case. Its sad really.
This is so spot on. I’ve shared it and watched it multiple times. The first half of my life was KJV, and the second has mostly been ESV.
That's the wrong one
Hell speedrun
You need to understand what the translations actually are, compare them they dont contradict eachother. English has been changing generation after generation just consider the way your grandfather talks compared to your child. The translations are for people to understand what they are reading and really a speed run to hell?? I didnt know you held judgment for that... remember this that Jesus tells us that the level of judgment you hold onto others will be held onto you @@kalwallingford7039
Just learn Hebrew and Greek and you don't need a translation
🙄
Thank you for the practical advice....why did they even bother translating the bible.
Let me just learn greek and Hebrew in an hour 👍👍👍
@@javierdelgado1554 Right on! Why do we even go to the doctor? We can just learn how to do surgery at home. 🤔🩺
@@javierdelgado1554 maybe because we can better translate it now and the kjv is over 400 years old . Kjv isn't he most accurate english translation. It was just extremely important in the time
It😊😊 was made
RSV 👀
Wich is better?
LOL it can't be ESV when they disqualify themselves with this nonsense:
"Your desire shall be contrary to your husband, but he shall rule over you." Haha congrats ESV you played yourself!
It’s really simple, one actually has all the verses and one is missing dozens of verses and is based of the wrong texts
That’s a misleading argument. Other versions DO NOT omit verses; the translation is based on ancient manuscripts that never had them to begin with. One could just as easily argue that the KJV added extra verses that were never there.
@@timwildsmith I 100% disagree, I understand that they are using a handful of older manuscripts that hardly any early church father ever quoted from. Manuscripts that were found with the Catholics that came from an area that was known to produce gnostics. Gods word clearly says that he will preserve his word, to make the claim that the early church that used the majority text were using the wrong texts for a thousand years were using the wrong texts is the same as calling God a liar. My God is not a God of confusion. The alexandrian texts should not be trusted,
The texts are about 95% identical, so wouldn't you argument mean that you can't trust the TR either? And of the places where they differ, what significant doctrinal issues are concerned? None. This is why the KJV-only TR argument confounds me.
Which translation would Drax be? 😆
The message
The Eastern Orthodox, translation from Aramaic.
There is no Orthodox translation unless you are talking about the St. Athanasius Academy LXX and the 1904 NT-but sadly, there is no complete Orthodox Bible in English.
Also, it isn’t translated from Aramaic-the NT and OT utilize Greek, and the ROC uses a mix of Messianic translations of the OT in many Russian translations.
NKJV is best
🤣
😂
😂😂😂
When you realize both of them were made up by some power hungry human
Word for word huh?
I thought they're all equally the word of God...sounds like the trinity lol.
"Things that are different are not the same." 👀
KJB
Nasb
I would have switched those around because KJV thinks it should be in charge😂
That's because it is.
@@sheriwalker-to1ws have to say I would agree it’s the better of the translation
then the NASB 2020 sticks its head around the corner and winks
Only to be clobbered by the LSB, lol
@@sanskritprayers lol, the LSB, the little brother that always follows the siblings around
How about the one that King James and Martin Luther didn’t take books out of? 😂😂
KJV had them, my guy.
Lol
😂😆😂
Lol, neither.
CSB for the win!! 😂😂
Evangelical Bible is preparing to offer a Schuyler in CSB early next year
Which one has lasted 400+ years?
This video made no sense whatsoever.
Other people seem to love it.
Call upon the Lord Jesus Christ and thou shalt be Saved! The King James Bible is Perfect.
The "esv" is corrupt. It makes countless changes. From Genesis onward.
Right now, aside from the NIV, I can't think of a translation that's been both so carefully produced and painstakingly reviewed as the ESV.
@@sanskritprayers Have you even looked at all changes you defending here? Or are you just going with crowd online??
@MichaelAChristian1 I study quite a bit and am familiar with the various approaches used by scholars and translators when it comes to making decisions about how to translate the texts.
Also, the texts themselves do not entirely stay uniform or constant, text to text. Some passages that were found among the documents leading to the KJV, for instance, don't appear in works later discovered that date prior to those used to support the KJV. An example is the woman found in adultery, from which passage the famous "he who is without sin, cast the first stone", is not found in earlier texts.
@MichaelAChristian1 it might help were you to take some time out to study and evaluate for yourself the truth of what I am saying here.
@@sanskritprayers That's just a lie they made up in 1800s. Even Wikipedia admits thus,"
The Latin Vulgate Gospel of John, produced by Jerome in 383, was based on the Greek manuscripts which Jerome considered ancient exemplars at that time and which contained the passage. Jerome, writing around 417, reports that the Pericope Adulterae was found in its usual place in "many Greek and Latin manuscripts" in Rome and the Latin West. This is confirmed by some Latin Fathers of the 300s and 400s, including Ambrose of Milan, and Augustine of Hippo. The latter claimed that the passage may have been improperly excluded from some manuscripts in order to avoid the impression that Christ had sanctioned adultery:
Certain persons of little faith, or rather enemies of the true faith, fearing, I suppose, lest their wives should be given impunity in sinning, removed from their manuscripts the Lord's act of forgiveness toward the adulteress, as if he who had said, Sin no more, had granted permission to sin.[b]"
When the stuff hits the fan, follow the guy with the beard
Why is it always KJV vs ESV? Meanwhile NASB is just chilling lol
Kinda like that raccoon back there. 😉
I take your point, but all other things being mostly equivalent, beauty in the writing breaks it out in favor of ESV and KJV
As a Received Text Bible believer who's passed from OAO through KJVO to simply taking each translation for what they're worth, I find this to be hilarious! I think that you should consider expanding this to "If Action Movie Characters Were Bibles"... if you're up for the onslaught of responses! 🤪
Kjv with the Apocrypha
@wendigoon lol
😂🤣😂