The fundamental phenomenon of dilation explains dark matter/galaxy rotation curves. Mass that is dilated is smeared through spacetime relative to an outside observer. It's the phenomenon behind the phrase "mass becomes infinite at the speed of light". A 2 axis graph illustrates its squared nature, dilation increases at an exponential rate the closer you get to the speed of light. A time dilation graph illustrates the same phenomenon, it's not just time that gets dilated. Dilation will occur wherever there is an astronomical quantity of mass because high mass means high momentum. This includes the centers of very high mass stars and the overwhelming majority of galaxy centers. It can be inferred mathematically that the mass at the center of our own galaxy is dilated. This means that there is no valid XYZ coordinate we can attribute to it, you can't point your finger at something that is smeared through spacetime. More precisely, everywhere you point is equally valid. In other words that mass is all around us. Dilation does not occur in galaxies with low mass centers because they do not have enough mass to achieve relativistic velocities. It has been confirmed in 6 very low mass galaxies including NGC 1052-DF2 and DF4 to have no dark matter, in other words they have normal rotation rates. All binary stars have normal rotation rates for the same reason.
I don't think you will have discovered dark matter particles, but you'd discover that dark matter is made of particles. To discover dark matter particles, you'd have to be able to describe their properties, like how much mass does each particle have, or what the spin of each particle has, or how much energy is released by the annihilation of two dark matter particle, etc.
Yes, the paper presents evidence for dark matter particles and the decay/annihilation of such particles. It will take observations of 100+ stars, ideally 1000+ stars, within a light year of our galaxy's supermassive black hole to actually discern the nature of the dark matter particles and the nature of the decay of such particles. The good news is that the Keck telescopes and the Very Large Telescope have the capability of detecting and observing a hundred such stars and soon to come on line 30-meter optical telescopes have the capability of detecting and observing 1000+ such stars.
I assume you are referring to the two News of the Day videos I posted on dark matter. It remains to be determined just how much of a fraction, if any, primordial black moles comprise of dark matter. The stars near our galaxy's supermassive black hole may provide the answer.
It's an assumption that the closer to a supermassive black hole that the concentration of dark matter would be greater. Yet the velocity and trajectories of stars near the supermassive black hole can be explained by the laws of motion and general relativity if the supermassive black hole weighs around 4 million solar masses. Thus there's no extra motion occurring to the stars to be blamed on dark matter. This implies there is less dark matter close to supermassive black holes than there is near stars and satellite galaxies orbiting furthest from the supermassive black hole. Example, our solar system was determined to be around 26,000 light years from the barycenter of the galaxy's mass and according to the temperature variations in the CMB is orbiting the center of the galaxy at around 530,000 mi/h. According to the estimated mass of the galaxy, 100 billion solar masses and the mass of our solar system being 1 solar mass it should have an orbital velocity around 86,000 mi/h, not 530,000 mi/h. This equates to a discrepancy or sigma in it's orbital velocity of around 450,000 mi/h. Thus the allusive dark matter was proposed to explain this unexpected extra motion. The motion of stars near the black hole can be explained by theory and laws. It's the motion of stars furthest from the black hole that can't be explained. We also know the brightness of a star is influenced by EM fields and energy. We know for a fact that the center of the Milky Way produces extremely high energy EM fields "light" as noted by Radio, X-ray, gamma ray and infrared telescopes. The core of Milky Way produces extremely strong electromagnetic fields. Take the star V383 Monocerotis as an example. In the Hubble data when the star exploded in 2002 all the background stars were dim, some were invisible to the Hubble telescope. As the energy from the star expanded outward from the exploding star, the brightness of background stars increased greatly. Indicating the energy produced by the explosion is what magnified and increased their brightness. As the energy wave expanded stars in the background which were invisible, suddenly became visible. Indicating the energy from the explosion is what caused the increase in their brightness, similar to the lensing effect of light. Thus I believe it is not dark matter annihilations causing the increased brightness of stars, but the high energy EM fields. The evidence indicates there is no dark matter in the center of the Milky Way near the supermassive black hole. That's why a dark matter halo surrounding the galaxy was proposed. It was supposed to explain why bodies furthest from the core of galaxies are being influenced. Observations are fact. What's causing the extra motion of stars and satellite galaxies is speculative. Just like the increased brightness of stars near the supermassive black hole is speculative. It's not proof of dark matter. I'm not convinced.
You missed the point of the paper. It is not that these stars possess excess velocities (they are too close to the supermassive black hole for that to be a factor). Rather, it is that they possess extra luminosities.
If massive stars are positively charged then the electrostatic repulsion must slow down their nuclear fusion. This is one explanation that should not be skipped.
@@hughross131 They are according to several papers. See "Astronomers Finally Have Important Details on What The Centre of Our Galaxy Looks Like SPACE, 11 July 2020, By EVAN GOUGH, UNIVERSE TODA".
Here is the quotation: "There's an enormous amount of hydrogen near the center of the Milky Way. That hydrogen is ionized by the energy from the galactic center. As an ionized gas, it's had its electrons stripped away." .
@@eytansuchard8640 Certainly. Ionized hydrogen clouds are seen everywhere within most galaxies. However, for nearly all stars the number of positively charged particles approximately equals the number of negatively charged particles.
Found something, not necessarily dark matter. Beyond a shadow of doubt? I mean, we’ve not directly detected even a single particle. We don’t know how something we’ve never tested will interact with Stars. Granted I’m not an astronomer, but this seems about as far fetched as aliens from another planet, perhaps more.
He's saying that if the hypothesis in this paper is true, and there's more research done to back it up and confirm it, then you could say beyond a shadow of a doubt it's true. At this point, we've discovered evidence that dark matter particles possibly exist. Now, it's time for scientists to test that theory.
@@keyman6689 The strength of the paper is that they presented observational evidence for what they propose and suggested straightforward follow up observations that could confirm what they propose. We need not wait long.
We see the gravitational effects of dark matter everywhere in the universe. It also explains why the universe measures to have a flat geometry. If it were not for 90% of our galaxy's mass being composed of dark matter, our galaxy would lack the spiral structure symmetry and stability essential for advanced life. For details and documentation, see Designed to the Core.
Thanks, Hugh. Very interesting. Is the dark matter expected to be concentrated toward the center of the galaxy, or distributed more widely throughout the galaxy? Also, dark matter has been posited to account for the difference between the expected rotation of galaxies, versus what is observed (among other things). Will this discovery, if it holds up, account for such things as galaxy rotation and other quandaries? Also, why is there a belief that dark mater particles would necessarily annihilate each other when we don't even know what they are? And why would their annihilation produce electromagnetic radiation?
Yes, astronomers expect dark matter to be concentrated toward the centers of galaxies and especially in the vicinity of supermassive black holes. Astronomers already know that dark matter accounts for the observed rotation rates of stars in the outskirts of galaxies. Dark matter particle decay/annihilation is not a given, but if it occurs there is a likelihood that it would result in electromagnetic radiation.
@@hughross131 If it was annihilated through collisions and produced EM radiation then it would be detectable everywhere, but it is not. The reason why it's called dark matter is because it can't be detected.
@@ronaldkemp3952 Dark matter cannot be easily detected. The produced EM radiation is very weak and hence very difficult for astronomers to detect: difficult but not impossible.
I want to ask. My questions... 1. The reality that we can see right now is that in this universe there are trillions of trillions of planets and galaxies. If there are countless trillions of trillions of planets... maybe not only planet Earth has living creatures inhabiting it...? For example, if there are a trillion other planets that have living creatures like Earth and its inhabitants are various types of non-human creatures, would Jesus also be God on those one trillion inhabited planets...? 2. The real facts that we can know right now... the earth is approximately 10 million km, the sun is 1.3 million times as big as the earth, and there is a star called U Scuty that is tens of billions of times as big as the sun . If the celestial bodies were super massive in size like that, the number in the trillions would be uncountable. How big do you think God the Creator is, bro...? Maybe God is only as big as the man Jesus...? 3. According to scientists, the universe is more than 13 billion years old, whereas according to historians, Adam and Eve only existed about 7 thousand years ago. Based on this science... maybe the universe has been empty without any living creatures inhabiting it for more than 13 billion years...? So what was Jesus doing for 13 billion years before there were humans, Adam and Eve...? Please answer me!!!!?!!!
Imagine photon emissions were along a collapsed geodesic that was essentially a wormhole from the photons perspective 🧐 it would kind of be like lightning finding a lead geodesic then transferring the energy to the observer 😂
Imagine a central core that only had two jets leaving the electromagnetic sphere and roughly spherical donut kind of accretion disk around the equator and no light could pass through the central core so it shows up as a dead spot electromagnetically when observing since the field is roughly parallel with the jets for most of the bulk where the accretion donut is 😂😊
I just watched a video on this within the last few days. I think it was Dr. Becky Smethurst. She quoted a paper but not sure it was this paper. Just found the paper - Elba Alonso-Monslave and David Kaiser's Primordial Black Holes with QCD Color Charge.
Why are dark matter particles annihilated (?like antimatter?) and can the light from the annihilation give any clues as to the nature of the particles?
The decay/annihilation time of dark matter particles, if they exist, is not known. However, electromagnetic radiation from dark matter decay/annihilation can give some clues as to the nature of dark matter particles and their decay characteristics.
@user-es4rm4ts5t Rubbish. You would not have the CROSS without that symbol. That symbol is in fact the shield of David. God chose the cross to save the whole world. Jews first,then the gentle. Furthermore. In the millennium Christ is going to sit on the throne of David and rule the whole world with a rod of iron.
@user-es4rm4ts5t To the early christians, the first being Jews (Peter James &John etc) the top triangle was held up by the seven lamp menorah; the light of God. And, the lower triangle held up the Pisces ( the fish symbol) like the one I use. Do you say the fish symbol is satanic as well???
@kenfaulds8818 😑 there is no star of David in the Bible. The star of remphan is though and it's satanic. You've been deceived. Or do you study the Talmud?
Whoops! I got it from your previous video! Great work - fascinating!
Wow! So very good. Exciting and potentially wildly affirming of our faith in our Creator.
Thank you Dr. Ross for the fascinating news.
The fundamental phenomenon of dilation explains dark matter/galaxy rotation curves. Mass that is dilated is smeared through spacetime relative to an outside observer. It's the phenomenon behind the phrase "mass becomes infinite at the speed of light". A 2 axis graph illustrates its squared nature, dilation increases at an exponential rate the closer you get to the speed of light. A time dilation graph illustrates the same phenomenon, it's not just time that gets dilated.
Dilation will occur wherever there is an astronomical quantity of mass because high mass means high momentum. This includes the centers of very high mass stars and the overwhelming majority of galaxy centers.
It can be inferred mathematically that the mass at the center of our own galaxy is dilated. This means that there is no valid XYZ coordinate we can attribute to it, you can't point your finger at something that is smeared through spacetime. More precisely, everywhere you point is equally valid. In other words that mass is all around us.
Dilation does not occur in galaxies with low mass centers because they do not have enough mass to achieve relativistic velocities. It has been confirmed in 6 very low mass galaxies including NGC 1052-DF2 and DF4 to have no dark matter, in other words they have normal rotation rates. All binary stars have normal rotation rates for the same reason.
It surprises me they don't yet know what dark matter is. I mean, it's so obvious.
I don't think you will have discovered dark matter particles, but you'd discover that dark matter is made of particles. To discover dark matter particles, you'd have to be able to describe their properties, like how much mass does each particle have, or what the spin of each particle has, or how much energy is released by the annihilation of two dark matter particle, etc.
Yes, the paper presents evidence for dark matter particles and the decay/annihilation of such particles. It will take observations of 100+ stars, ideally 1000+ stars, within a light year of our galaxy's supermassive black hole to actually discern the nature of the dark matter particles and the nature of the decay of such particles. The good news is that the Keck telescopes and the Very Large Telescope have the capability of detecting and observing a hundred such stars and soon to come on line 30-meter optical telescopes have the capability of detecting and observing 1000+ such stars.
Not annihilation but phase transition.
What is going to be the relationship of the two?
I assume you are referring to the two News of the Day videos I posted on dark matter. It remains to be determined just how much of a fraction, if any, primordial black moles comprise of dark matter. The stars near our galaxy's supermassive black hole may provide the answer.
It's an assumption that the closer to a supermassive black hole that the concentration of dark matter would be greater. Yet the velocity and trajectories of stars near the supermassive black hole can be explained by the laws of motion and general relativity if the supermassive black hole weighs around 4 million solar masses. Thus there's no extra motion occurring to the stars to be blamed on dark matter.
This implies there is less dark matter close to supermassive black holes than there is near stars and satellite galaxies orbiting furthest from the supermassive black hole.
Example, our solar system was determined to be around 26,000 light years from the barycenter of the galaxy's mass and according to the temperature variations in the CMB is orbiting the center of the galaxy at around 530,000 mi/h. According to the estimated mass of the galaxy, 100 billion solar masses and the mass of our solar system being 1 solar mass it should have an orbital velocity around 86,000 mi/h, not 530,000 mi/h. This equates to a discrepancy or sigma in it's orbital velocity of around 450,000 mi/h. Thus the allusive dark matter was proposed to explain this unexpected extra motion. The motion of stars near the black hole can be explained by theory and laws. It's the motion of stars furthest from the black hole that can't be explained.
We also know the brightness of a star is influenced by EM fields and energy. We know for a fact that the center of the Milky Way produces extremely high energy EM fields "light" as noted by Radio, X-ray, gamma ray and infrared telescopes. The core of Milky Way produces extremely strong electromagnetic fields.
Take the star V383 Monocerotis as an example. In the Hubble data when the star exploded in 2002 all the background stars were dim, some were invisible to the Hubble telescope. As the energy from the star expanded outward from the exploding star, the brightness of background stars increased greatly. Indicating the energy produced by the explosion is what magnified and increased their brightness. As the energy wave expanded stars in the background which were invisible, suddenly became visible. Indicating the energy from the explosion is what caused the increase in their brightness, similar to the lensing effect of light.
Thus I believe it is not dark matter annihilations causing the increased brightness of stars, but the high energy EM fields. The evidence indicates there is no dark matter in the center of the Milky Way near the supermassive black hole. That's why a dark matter halo surrounding the galaxy was proposed. It was supposed to explain why bodies furthest from the core of galaxies are being influenced. Observations are fact.
What's causing the extra motion of stars and satellite galaxies is speculative. Just like the increased brightness of stars near the supermassive black hole is speculative. It's not proof of dark matter. I'm not convinced.
You missed the point of the paper. It is not that these stars possess excess velocities (they are too close to the supermassive black hole for that to be a factor). Rather, it is that they possess extra luminosities.
If massive stars are positively charged then the electrostatic repulsion must slow down their nuclear fusion. This is one explanation that should not be skipped.
Another problem is that the formation of stars can be from already used material with high metallicity.
The massive stars may not be positively charged.
@@hughross131 They are according to several papers. See "Astronomers Finally Have Important Details on What The Centre of Our Galaxy Looks Like SPACE, 11 July 2020, By EVAN GOUGH, UNIVERSE TODA".
Here is the quotation: "There's an enormous amount of hydrogen near the center of the Milky Way. That hydrogen is ionized by the energy from the galactic center. As an ionized gas, it's had its electrons stripped away." .
@@eytansuchard8640 Certainly. Ionized hydrogen clouds are seen everywhere within most galaxies. However, for nearly all stars the number of positively charged particles approximately equals the number of negatively charged particles.
Found something, not necessarily dark matter. Beyond a shadow of doubt? I mean, we’ve not directly detected even a single particle. We don’t know how something we’ve never tested will interact with Stars. Granted I’m not an astronomer, but this seems about as far fetched as aliens from another planet, perhaps more.
He's saying that if the hypothesis in this paper is true, and there's more research done to back it up and confirm it, then you could say beyond a shadow of a doubt it's true. At this point, we've discovered evidence that dark matter particles possibly exist. Now, it's time for scientists to test that theory.
@@keyman6689 The strength of the paper is that they presented observational evidence for what they propose and suggested straightforward follow up observations that could confirm what they propose. We need not wait long.
the existence of dark matter is not disputed? ahahah the standard model is better than a clown show
We see the gravitational effects of dark matter everywhere in the universe. It also explains why the universe measures to have a flat geometry. If it were not for 90% of our galaxy's mass being composed of dark matter, our galaxy would lack the spiral structure symmetry and stability essential for advanced life. For details and documentation, see Designed to the Core.
Thanks, Hugh. Very interesting. Is the dark matter expected to be concentrated toward the center of the galaxy, or distributed more widely throughout the galaxy? Also, dark matter has been posited to account for the difference between the expected rotation of galaxies, versus what is observed (among other things). Will this discovery, if it holds up, account for such things as galaxy rotation and other quandaries? Also, why is there a belief that dark mater particles would necessarily annihilate each other when we don't even know what they are? And why would their annihilation produce electromagnetic radiation?
Yes, astronomers expect dark matter to be concentrated toward the centers of galaxies and especially in the vicinity of supermassive black holes. Astronomers already know that dark matter accounts for the observed rotation rates of stars in the outskirts of galaxies. Dark matter particle decay/annihilation is not a given, but if it occurs there is a likelihood that it would result in electromagnetic radiation.
@@hughross131 If it was annihilated through collisions and produced EM radiation then it would be detectable everywhere, but it is not. The reason why it's called dark matter is because it can't be detected.
@@ronaldkemp3952 Dark matter cannot be easily detected. The produced EM radiation is very weak and hence very difficult for astronomers to detect: difficult but not impossible.
I want to ask. My questions... 1. The reality that we can see right now is that in this universe there are trillions of trillions of planets and galaxies. If there are countless trillions of trillions of planets... maybe not only planet Earth has living creatures inhabiting it...? For example, if there are a trillion other planets that have living creatures like Earth and its inhabitants are various types of non-human creatures, would Jesus also be God on those one trillion inhabited planets...? 2. The real facts that we can know right now... the earth is approximately 10 million km, the sun is 1.3 million times as big as the earth, and there is a star called U Scuty that is tens of billions of times as big as the sun . If the celestial bodies were super massive in size like that, the number in the trillions would be uncountable. How big do you think God the Creator is, bro...? Maybe God is only as big as the man Jesus...? 3. According to scientists, the universe is more than 13 billion years old, whereas according to historians, Adam and Eve only existed about 7 thousand years ago. Based on this science... maybe the universe has been empty without any living creatures inhabiting it for more than 13 billion years...? So what was Jesus doing for 13 billion years before there were humans, Adam and Eve...? Please answer me!!!!?!!!
Awesome. Thanks Dear Brother in Christ.
Imagine photon emissions were along a collapsed geodesic that was essentially a wormhole from the photons perspective 🧐 it would kind of be like lightning finding a lead geodesic then transferring the energy to the observer 😂
Imagine a central core that only had two jets leaving the electromagnetic sphere and roughly spherical donut kind of accretion disk around the equator and no light could pass through the central core so it shows up as a dead spot electromagnetically when observing since the field is roughly parallel with the jets for most of the bulk where the accretion donut is 😂😊
Much Love Hugh found u from chuckie missler
Another fine video.
Thank you.
I just watched a video on this within the last few days. I think it was Dr. Becky Smethurst. She quoted a paper but not sure it was this paper. Just found the paper - Elba Alonso-Monslave and David Kaiser's Primordial Black Holes with QCD Color Charge.
I posted a News of the Day video on this paper 5 days ago (June 20, 2024) on the Reasons to Believe TH-cam channel.
Why are dark matter particles annihilated (?like antimatter?) and can the light from the annihilation give any clues as to the nature of the particles?
The decay/annihilation time of dark matter particles, if they exist, is not known. However, electromagnetic radiation from dark matter decay/annihilation can give some clues as to the nature of dark matter particles and their decay characteristics.
Great upload ✝️✡️✝️👍
Ew keep that satanic symbol away from the cross!
@user-es4rm4ts5t Rubbish.
You would not have the CROSS without that symbol.
That symbol is in fact the shield of David.
God chose the cross to save the whole world.
Jews first,then the gentle.
Furthermore. In the millennium Christ is going to sit on the throne of David and rule the whole world with a rod of iron.
@kenfaulds8818 uh that symbol has nothing to do with the cross OR king David. Might wanna search the star of remphan bud
@user-es4rm4ts5t To the early christians, the first being Jews (Peter James &John etc) the top triangle was held up by the seven lamp menorah; the light of God. And, the lower triangle held up the Pisces ( the fish symbol) like the one I use.
Do you say the fish symbol is satanic as well???
@kenfaulds8818 😑 there is no star of David in the Bible. The star of remphan is though and it's satanic. You've been deceived. Or do you study the Talmud?
Sorry,no particles exist.we dream it ,make it all up.unreal dreamers in an unreal dream.thete is no physical universe
Interesting..
What’s your theory please? Thanks