To fast?

[@IlanSaysHi]

Whiplash engines are incredibly good

[@Renard380]

...or not to fast. That is the question! 🙄

[@CLOCK-WORK]

Lol true

[@nicolasrizzo8547]

this jet got to Mach 4.3, not that bad being that small

[@CLOCK-WORK]

I can build one that goes over 1.700 a little bit

[@docnathan3959]

Now make an SSTO of a similar design.

[@CLOCK-WORK]

Na

[@MarshMiloshkavitz]

@@CLOCK-WORKlol

[@untethered3]

Let’s make that 52 view

[@eekee6034]

Your main (rear) landing gear is too far back to let it take off. It should be a little behind the center of mass, just far enough back to be reasonably stable.
I once had a bigger plane than this powered by a single whiplash engine. I tried to pull a loop-the-loop at maximum speed. Instead, the plane left the atmosphere vertically and reached an altitude of 146km! :D This little thing might be able to beat that! Though I don't know about its intake. Perhaps you could fit it backwards behind a mk0 cone or something. The game-breaking minimalist players use that intake backwards.
Oh, pilot blacked out? I wasn't playing with that enabled. I respect those who do!

[@CLOCK-WORK]

Bro this plane is just me showing off a fast plane it's not meant to be the best plane ever

[@eekee6034]

@@CLOCK-WORK I guess I didn't learn that until after I'd commented. ^.^'

[@CLOCK-WORK]

@@eekee6034 yea it's ok

[@FireheadGaming123abc]

I’d advise you to use different intakes like the radially mounted ramp intakes, they are less prone to overheating and work better at high speeds. They also look much cooler. Fr though, nice vid

[@CLOCK-WORK]

Yea I know but I am not trying to break a world record here

[@eekee6034]

Radially-mounted ramp intakes have quite high drag if they're not pointed straight into the airstream. You can still use them, but it's something to be a little wary about.

[@CLOCK-WORK]

@@eekee6034 again not trying to set a world record here

[@eekee6034]

@@CLOCK-WORK Yeah, fair enough. To be honest, I'm starting to get a little bit bored with Kerbal world records anyway.

[@CLOCK-WORK]

@@eekee6034 yea I am as well

[@carking0138]

This is not too fast, you need to make it faster.

[@CLOCK-WORK]

Yes I do

[@oliverreynolds5574]

EPIC, VERY INSPIRING

[@dpattz]

If it works, its still not enough

[@beezo2560]

Impressive

[@thatGUYbehindthemask]

Not fast enough. Needs a ram air i take and a precooler.

[@theKam0087]

Not fast enough

[@64ND41-F]

My interceptor with 4 of these engines is faster . . . and why are there Solid Fuel "Boosters"

[@CLOCK-WORK]

Oh no I've made faster jets my max one I made was 1763.7 and with only 1 jet engine

[@64ND41-F]

@@CLOCK-WORK How did that not overheat and explode?

[@CLOCK-WORK]

@@64ND41-F idk it's just ksp physics I gess

[@eekee6034]

@@64ND41-F Different parts have different temperature limits and different amounts of drag. It's all on the wiki, but you can also see part temperatures in the parts menu while you're building. That big popup has it in the upper middle.

[@kefpull6676]

You're playing with no mods? wow...

[@TommyLikeTom]

Dude, if you think that you exhausted the game's content without mods you're lying to yourself. Please don't be one of those people who thinks all games need mods when you can't even play the base game properly

[@visvires6305]

Reason not the need. Why wouldn't you throw on Chatterer?@@TommyLikeTom

[@CLOCK-WORK]

There are no mods only the 2 dlcs

[@CLOCK-WORK]

Also if you can't play a normal game fuck you

[@CLOCK-WORK]

​@@TommyLikeTomtrue

[@LDTV22OfficialChannel]

*too

[@CLOCK-WORK]

People Don't like grammar sharks you know