I work for Harman as a SME for transducer engineering design. I don't typically look at a lot of technical reviews on TH-cam about speakers because frankly they are not that technical. That said, you do a fantastic job in your reviews. I really like the way you blend objective technical data and your own subjective points in your reviews. You do this in a way that makes excellent technical data easy for the general interested public to understand. I own a set of JBL M2 Master reference monitors and a set of JBL L100s and your reviews on both of these speaker designs is spot on. Keep up the great work in your reviews. BTW anyone who sets up a Klippel Scanner in their garage has at least two things going for them. 1. passion for audio and objectivity. 2. understanding and supportive spouse/children/pets/neighbors, etc. Thank you!
Man, I tell you what, these kind of comments do a great job of lifting me up when I’m feeling bummed out about other comments. So thank for the kind words.
Even though you make speaker reviews so often, ive almost forgot how you explain the off axis, distance from wall, and all the other little detailed descriptions you use for newbies starting off in the hobbie figuring out why their speaker sounds the way it does. I appreciate you going the distance to be so inclusive to every new person to the channel or hobbie. Keep up the good work!
Thanks for the feedback. I know I’ve had others mention that maybe I don’t need to keep doing this, but I try to run the balance between giving helpful information to a newcomer but not saying all the same stuff and eating up too much time for each video. So I appreciate your comment. It helps me feel like I’m on the right track.
@@ErinsAudioCorner I do wonder whether front to wall is the measurement that matters. That's where the diffraction / baffle step is taking place, so any out of phase reflection should IMO be related to front to wall distance.
An outstanding review of a divisive speaker. Subjective takes supported by measurements and a satisfying conclusion. You’re doing the Lord’s work, Erin!
Good review. The new crossover is one of the biggest features of the speaker. I've been running it bi-amp for months and it kicks some serious ass. Party on Garth and let the good times roll!
Sounds like JBL took the concept of making a quality modern version of an iconic design seriously. Nice to see JBL still cares about engineering and quality audio. Obviously not a speaker for everyone, but a great fit for some.
I bought a pair of JBL L100 back in 1974 for $333.00 each brand new. For a total cost of $666.00. They go down to 30hz and I still have them today. The veneer is four times as thick as the thin veneer of these. The only thing replaced was new brass speaker terminals, new foam around the tweeters and new grills. Loved them then and love them today. With the improvements to manufacturing and automation plus CNC machines the inflationary price equivalent should make the price less than what they charge today. Insatiable thirst for profit and simple greed is going to kill these companies in the long run.
I would LOVE these. My ears hate the 1 - 2 kHz band and LOVE a kickdrum that feels in the chest. Also, dynamic range is king since I play at concert levels. 🤘🤘🤘
I currently have a set of JBL 4311’s with a Marantz 2270 and they sound pretty good. I do have a set of the JBL L100 classic black edition on order, can wait to hear the updated drivers; especially that 12” woofer!! Thanks for your review.
I have a pair of these hooked up to a pioneer Spec 1 pre amp and a Kenwood 700M amplifier. Fantastic! Listen primarily to jazz, funk and rock. Really nice. Did some work with room treatment for first and second reflections and a ceiling cloud because my space is small so I can only get about 8 inches from the side walls, no toe, just straight ahead and about 18 inches from the front wall. Sounds great.
I have these speakers and for the cost I dont think they are the best. But the nostalgic look is what sells it for me and everyone else(IMO). Having said that, they do sound amazing to my ear, and I have it paired with two powered subs to complete the full range experience. JBL4Life.
@@ErinsAudioCorner I'm building the Fidelia right now and am excited to hear them. I'm glad you like them. Harry is a nice guy and I'm hoping Audio First is successful.
These are by far my favourite speakers. I also have the L26 and have owned hundreds of speakers that I resell. I Can never bring myself to sell these. Put a Phil Collins live CD and these speakers are just incredible. Btw mine are original with cloth grill that I never use
Good video, that peak at 2 khz can be corrected by adding a LCR shunt on the crossover, also that dip at 600 hz can be corrected lowering the midrange low cut changing the value of the capacitor, it seems the designer of that speaker is a novice or doesn't know what he was doing, that speaker with a better designed crossover can give a much better response
Your credibility is 100% w/me Erin. I look for your review if I’m considering an audio purchase. I’m 71 and need to be extra careful with how I spend my money on a fixed income. I never make a decision based on measurements alone, but I like to see them as a starting point. These JBL L100’s measured better than I thought they would. I’ve always felt JBL gear was a little overpriced. I learn from your videos. I’m a music lover first and foremost. I’m not that analytical about every minute detail when listening to music. But I like above entry-level gear that fits my budget. I’d love to hear your thoughts on how this JBL model compares to the Super Denton. That’s a speaker I could consider if it sounds good to me. Different price points, but similar three-way offset driver array. The L100 Classic seems to be capitalizing on the “Nostalgia” angle.
Firstly. JBL was always an American Iconic Loudspeaker Manufacturer. The #1 desired speaker to build a Hi-Fi system around. Not to mention, most Classic Rock & Roll recordings & studios insisted on monitoring & editing sound tracks on ! JBL home speakers continued that tradition with gorgeous models to most entry levels. I owned their highly appraised L-166 Horizon. The bookshelf speaker with their "Egg carton" grills ! I can go on & on. It wasn't perfect. But it too is an evolution from their previous icon L-100 Century. I was elated to see JBL return to its roots with the current & new L-100. There's just one, no two black eyes with them ? Price !! $5,000 usd is absurd. Although! Their Special Edition piano black does have me staring at my bank account pondering ? LOL $5K USD buys more than two box speakers. It buys American Heritage. *I just hope & 🙏 they are still manufactured in California ?
@CptMark Bummer. A 3rd reason to LOWER their asking prices. They would move more units & possibly return production state side. The crappy JBL logo products can remain abroad. Bring speaker production back home!
These speakers are going to haunt me forever i guess. I could have gotten a original set for $25 bucks at goodwill a few years ago but had no idea they are worth 💰.
I have a set of original L100A's that I believe were purchased in 1989, I'm glad to see the new model isn't just a vintage gimmick and performs great, when I'm ready to part with mine I'd love to send them for measurements
I have jbl studio monitors from the 80's. Tweeter is really hot, I have to attenuate it like 6db even off axis. I like the old school big bass driver and cabinets even though it makes room placement a bit difficult.
I am currently using the JBL 100 classics. After your review of The Source Point 888 I decided to purchase a pair. I hope they are positive upgrade. Your opinion would be much appreciated.
I 100% think you made the right choice. The MoFi aren’t simply more linear; they also better deeper bass extension. This comes at the cost of sensitivity but that’s the only noteworthy downside IMHO.
@ErinsAudioCorner thank you again really appreciate your feedback. I am new to your channel and I really enjoy it thoroughly. Finest review in my opinion.
I’d take the MoFi. And cheap plug, if you order it please consider using this link that earns me a small commission (it works for the JBL, too): howl.link/cmAQVKU2D3Z
Would you say someone who chooses this vintage design would miss the imaging performance as something like the Mofi 888 ? I love the vintage, but my hunch is, since staging is my favorite attribute of 2-channel, I should stick to modern designs ?? Your thoughts ?
@@rosswarren436 I guess the better question might be as well ? When stepping up in purchase, FOMO is real. Wonder if it's a safer bet to buy the 888 in hopes it's the right decision :) Making a safer bet in pursuit of an end game.
@@27b-6Buttle if the Mofi 888 are designed such that the woofers mounted below do all the bass heavy lifting (and movement) and the midrange around the tweeter doesn't move much, causing changes in the tweeter's response, then YES. That was the Achille's heel of both the SP10 and SP8. They were reviewed as being really good speakers, but Danny at GR Research did some tests showing that on the SP8, the position of the woofer around the tweeter can appreciably affect the response. So, maybe Andrew Jones worked his magic on the 888 and addressed that issue. Do note that fortunately or unfortunately, all speakers are made to a price point and usually it is the out of sight crossover components that suffer, leaving some performance on the table. The bad thing is that it is that way, the good thing is that if you really want, you can fix it for an additional cost. Good luck in whatever speakers you choose.
Been looking at these as my "end game" speakers with a subwoofer. Now I know which areas to EQ - BIG THANK YOU - And a big question (you knew someone would ask): These or the Super Linton, also with a subwoofer, in a 13' x 25' x 8' room? I know these are substantially larger but the Linton will play at 110 dB. The Super Linton are half the price of the L100 MkII. Did JBL miss the mark in not making the new L100 MkII mirrored pairs for better soundstage imaging?
Those kinds of box speakers with 12 inch woofers used to cost a couple hundred dollars back in the 80s. I know prices rise over the years, but $4800 seems ridiculous to me. Also, other reviewers have mentioned the build quality is not good, and the veneer started to peel after a relatively short amount of time.
Yeah I had a pair like that back in the '80s. In the '90s when I started buying higher quality electronics I realized they were pure garbage and ended up getting Magnepans. I was never impressed by JBL and I can't imagine why anyone would spend that kind of money on such an archaic design when there are so many awesome speakers available.
@@chrislj2890 I still have my circa 82’ $500 a pair Boston A150’s that I wouldn’t trade or sell for any new design. I tickle them with a 76’ Yamaha CA-800 and have a very barely used 80’ Sansui AU-417 for backup.
. Lol..... Have you seen the JBL driver? Here's the part number. JBL 2262HPL 338312-004X 12" Neo Woofer. That's a whole different universe than Grandpappy's stamped steel Realistics.
@@TriAmpMyFi,These are commercial transducers,not what’s OEM in the L100 3way Loudspeakers. The driver part may be listed incorrectly on your parts list.😮😮😮 ,Also check the manufacturer model year before you purchase parts.
FWIW a pair of L100 Century speakers was about $550 in 1971. That’s about $4200 in 2024. Given the parts quality and performance improvements made by the time we get to this generation of the L100, the price difference seems about right. I don’t know what speakers you’re citing were a couple hundred dollars in the 80s, but they were probably not very good.
A good test for viewer's listening environment: If you can hear the "voice isolation" plug-in Erin is using, then you have a decent set up. I personally think these "voice isolation" tools are counterproductive when applying them to dialogue that's recorded in a relatively isolated and controlled environment without much noise pollution. It cuts off just enough of the start and end of sentences to be annoying, especially as someone's natural inflections move up and down. I can hear that garble in the high frequencies, and when it kicks in too hard it just gets muffled, and the whole thing starts to sound unnatural. These plug ins are great if you're recording outdoors with lots of other noises going on around you and you don't have a good shotgun mic to really get good isolation. But please, if you're indoors with a good microphone, no need to use these plug-ins. Save yourself some time and headache.
I use one because I have kids in the house making a lot of noise. I usually try to film my videos early in the morning before they’re awake, but it doesn’t always work out that way. I backed off the gate on my more recent video. We’ll see how that works.
A clean quality recording such as Brothers in Arms is likely to sound fairly good on most any stereo system, I'm not sure it tests much to show weaknesses in a speaker, just more of a familiar recording to listen and hear other equipment through. I owned the original mk1 JBL L100 Classics for a while, play some poor indie recordings through those JBL's or even some AC/DC or similar and that midrange and treble will probably be painful.
Erin, the sound that you described that stood out to you with these speakers is, as far as I know, that's the classic JBL sound .. anyway, that's the JBL sound I remember..(and yes, the controls get cranked lol)😂
I have a set and I found out that it seems to sound the best when on the floor on a carpet. The stands are over rated. I found the transistor radio sound went away when on the floor.
Erin, I have the klipsch rf711 and wanna ask would it be worth the expense and difference in sound quality to purchase these and sell my klipsch? I rarely make a comment or ask a question so from one wildcat fan to another ..what’s your opinion 😂
How does such a thick grill make sense..? Ooo, that Fidelia looks like direct competition to Sierra-1 V2, with a tiny bit smaller woofer, and a lot more DIY work. And likely no refund option.
Im sure they sound great but there's no way I'd spend that much for essentially just some woofers and tweeters in a box. It looks like you can easily DIY a similar sounding speaker for a fraction of the cost
You can, if you know what you are doing extremely well - maybe have an engineering degree - and have acoustic tools (going to buy a Klippel like Erin?) or you buy a kit designed by someone who does, plus you have all the woodworking equipment, the space, and the time to devote to doing a very good job, then applying veneer to make it look good. You might have those resources, but many don't, and they can't justify the cost to buy all that needed equipment and maybe buy an outbuilding to set it up in. Think of all the people who rent homes or apartments and simply can't do a project like that. GR Research has their DIY and Brute "vintage looking" models. I'm sure they might even beat the JBL L100 MkII, but if you buy them built and finished with a nice veneer, the costs are roughly comparable. Most people can't justify DIY, hence they buy finished speakers. That's how these companies all stay in business.
It is. But you have to make that change. If you don’t have a reference then these changes are harder to hear. Whether that reference be a real time change or an A/B comparison. (Hopefully at least level matched)
Agree, with both of the above, in my opinion what doesn’t get enough attention, at least in what I read and watch, is the importance of the room and just how much impact the listening area makes, in addition to the the speakers physical setup / locations, which of course ALSO matter a great deal.
Would you pair these with 'musical' subwoofers like the Rel t5x or just big output, an SVS. (Is the 'musical' subwoofer a myth). Another tangent, from watching many of your videos, I believe the Blade 2 metas are your favorite; do you believe the focal utopias compete? Meanwhile I'm a poor peasant here who bought a kef q concerto meta because of your review (new $1720 CAD, $1225 USD), with a KEF Kc62 subwoofer (also from your reviews). Am I missing a lot for a small room (400 sq ft)? When I went to hear the Blade 1 metas in store, it doesn't sound that different to me. But obviously super different if in my room. OH well (I listen to vocal music, pop, rap) Any thoughts on tube amps vs Wiim amp (bought wiim amp because of you too!)❤❤Haha, thanks a bunch Erin. I've spent tens of hours watching you
Music subs are a myth. Look at frequency response, resonances, and group delay. I have owned a number of subs and use two 18” JTR subs for music. They have more detail and texture than any sub I have owned in the pass. The crazy output is just a bonus.
I don’t think there’s anything “musical” about certain subwoofers. most of the time it just has to do with how low they get or if they are resident. Most of the time people attribute “musical“ to not having a lot of low frequency base that would otherwise make the room sound boom or peaky in certain frequencies. From what I’ve seen of REL subwoofers, they tend to not have much low frequency extension. this is most likely why some described them as musical. I’m more a fan of using a subwoofer that has good extension and pairing it with proper equalization to attenuate any room modes that are distracting. The above user mentioned SVS. That’s a good brand who has an app that will allow you to equalize the speakers response for your room. in my opinion, that’s the best way to go for a simple set up unless you use external equalization.
Yeah about always never heard them either. lol. Not talking about these but S line, M2, studio or Everest. Or even their cinema speakers if you have a huge room.
It's funny in a way, because if anyone has attended a large venue concert in the last 40 years, then they likely have heard JBL (or Electro Voice) speakers.
an excellent, concise analysis of a newly revisited classic. if you've had time w/ the originals, do have you any opinion in comparison? "sounds" like JBL intended to revisit not only the look & features, but the acoustic, yet enable one to flatten them out on-the-fly if so desired. my experience (w/ L88Ps upgraded to L100 bitd) is that they sound best playing the music of the era (rock, baby!) when their older sister design was common in the studios. a sorta acoustical time machine for us ancient ones.
well Erin I don't think they're that bad, but at the same time, the price of $2400 EACH is a little steep, but, that said, if they're typically going to go for 20% or more discounted off of MSRP, then I guess it's OK
I keep waiting for that. It happened with the "new" L100 but only after a few years. Wish the L100 MkII would do the same, but probably not until late 2026. We'll see.
@ yeah that's seems to be the way things typically go .. the first in line pay more .. goes towards funding the up front NRE costs that are incurred before the NPI. . anyhoo..that's how it goes with other tech hardware!😉
I don't know about the later ones, but early ones really don"t sound very good. The 4311"s sure were used all over the place in 70s recording studios though.
Hmm another sad showing from JBL IMO. JBL has the capability to make amazing speakers and why they don’t hold that high standard for all their speakers, I will never understand.
Normally, I’m pretty tough on all manufacturers when the response isn’t linear. If you look back at my recent JBL stage two speaker review, you’ll see I went *really* hard on them for that. But with these I feel like they are intentionally designed to give off a “classic” sound and then they’ve provided a way for the user to make it more linear via the knobs.
@@ErinsAudioCorner that’s a good point because back in the day the West Coast sound that JBL was famous for had that carved out mid range but now at least they let you adjust that dip. Just way too overpriced.
Worst speaker I’ve heard has been the one with the flattest in room response. Lifeless, dull, just plane not nice. Our hearing isn’t linear. At the average listening level of say 70db ish we need a bass and treble boost to hear a linear response. Which is why all my preamps have tone and or loudness compensation circuits. If speaker response automatically basically compensates for our non linear hearing it’s already a plus.
oh laaaaaaawwwwd. Of COURSE it sounded terrible. Because flat in-room sounds like garbage. That’s different than flat *anechoic*. Check out the video I made on this topic: th-cam.com/video/_tnWB8Rl0Ms/w-d-xo.html
I’m just not a fan of vintage speakers especially big square boxy looking ones.JBL has never peaked my interest and still don’t. Thank God we have choices. Keep up the good work.
I hear you. Some of them I like and some of them I don’t. There are definitely a lot of people who love them, but there are plenty of others who don’t. Like you said, it’s a good thing we have options. It’s a good time to be an audio geek for sure.
Did I hear that right $4,800? Unless they've changed a great deal since I've heard a pair I wouldn't want to listen to them even if they gave them away for free. Maybe that's just me but I didn't like them at all.
i heard them a couple of times, it was a fun speaker but i can instantly notice the wood box sound and it distracts me, i can ear it´s lack of resolution also, but then again i have Magico S3 and so 99% of wood cabinets are instantly noticed by me. If i had a pair of this jbl i would find a way to dampen that box and maybe insert some bracing
@@ErinsAudioCorner i dont have socials except linkdin but you can find me there under Goncalo Santos Carvalho then i can send some fotos of the magicos and also i can send you the rew file, best i can do :) without shipping 350lb of speakers across the world hehehe
So it seems - drivers are good, crossover is bad. Like the old L100s, if you measure each driver and engineer a totally new crossover, it will sound great. That said, not everything can be fixed with the crossover, because the stupid midrangers are not flush mounted! It's mind-boggling that such an expensive speaker can have such a basic flaw.
I'm 4 years into ownership of the L100 Classics and the grills feel like they did when I bought them. JBL says they changed the foam and it will not go brittle like the original L100.
Not true today. The material is not the same. 40 years of material science, particularly the billions spent on plastics (Did you see 'The Graduate'?) have made a difference.
And Fyne Audio has some nice ones going for $6500/pair. Wharfedale has some for $9000. In Stereophile you can find reviews of speakers going for $69,000/pair like the Audiovector R 8 Arrete. Everyone wants quality sound. We just have to know when to get off the merry-go-round and buy something price and performance commensurate with our sources and amp (and our ears).
@ErinsAudioCorner I understand that the producers use measurements when designing loudspeakers. But theres is no use for it on a daily basis. Thats why I say your ears are the best instrument. 🤓 I dont like the L100. I have heard them a lot of times in different setups. To expensive for what you get. Go vintage if you want good rock speakers. I have a small pair of L15 and they kick a.. 🎸🤗
@@legomandk9964 it's wild to me that you'd say all that while putting your trust into the designer but disregarding that he was on my channel for an interview (and I spoke with him last week) to discuss his designs and measurements' importance in evaluating the accuracy of the speaker. But you do you. ;)
@@ErinsAudioCorner You miss my point.🤗 No matter how many messurements you make. I dos not change the fact that its your perception of sound thats important. What the designer says is not important to me. I live in Denmark where there are so many high end loudspeaker producers. So we are kind of spoiled regarding good sounding speakers.😉 Jbl have never been the speakers I go to for an audiofile experience. But when wanting to listen to my 1970-90 rock albums I use vintage Jbl speakers for maximum enjoyment.👍🏻🎸🤗
Erin, I have the klipsch rf711 and wanna ask would it be worth the expense and difference in sound quality to purchase these and sell my klipsch? I rarely make a comment or ask a question so from one wildcat fan to another ..what’s your opinion 😂
I work for Harman as a SME for transducer engineering design. I don't typically look at a lot of technical reviews on TH-cam about speakers because frankly they are not that technical. That said, you do a fantastic job in your reviews. I really like the way you blend objective technical data and your own subjective points in your reviews. You do this in a way that makes excellent technical data easy for the general interested public to understand. I own a set of JBL M2 Master reference monitors and a set of JBL L100s and your reviews on both of these speaker designs is spot on. Keep up the great work in your reviews. BTW anyone who sets up a Klippel Scanner in their garage has at least two things going for them. 1. passion for audio and objectivity. 2. understanding and supportive spouse/children/pets/neighbors, etc. Thank you!
Man, I tell you what, these kind of comments do a great job of lifting me up when I’m feeling bummed out about other comments. So thank for the kind words.
Even though you make speaker reviews so often, ive almost forgot how you explain the off axis, distance from wall, and all the other little detailed descriptions you use for newbies starting off in the hobbie figuring out why their speaker sounds the way it does. I appreciate you going the distance to be so inclusive to every new person to the channel or hobbie. Keep up the good work!
Thanks for the feedback. I know I’ve had others mention that maybe I don’t need to keep doing this, but I try to run the balance between giving helpful information to a newcomer but not saying all the same stuff and eating up too much time for each video. So I appreciate your comment. It helps me feel like I’m on the right track.
@@ErinsAudioCorner I do wonder whether front to wall is the measurement that matters. That's where the diffraction / baffle step is taking place, so any out of phase reflection should IMO be related to front to wall distance.
An outstanding review of a divisive speaker. Subjective takes supported by measurements and a satisfying conclusion. You’re doing the Lord’s work, Erin!
Thank you for the awesome review. I've been waiting for this for years.
Good review. The new crossover is one of the biggest features of the speaker. I've been running it bi-amp for months and it kicks some serious ass. Party on Garth and let the good times roll!
Sounds like JBL took the concept of making a quality modern version of an iconic design seriously. Nice to see JBL still cares about engineering and quality audio. Obviously not a speaker for everyone, but a great fit for some.
I absolutely love the vintage big cabinet front firing looks of these speakers.
I bought a pair of JBL L100 back in 1974 for $333.00 each brand new. For a total cost of $666.00. They go down to 30hz and I still have them today. The veneer is four times as thick as the thin veneer of these. The only thing replaced was new brass speaker terminals, new foam around the tweeters and new grills. Loved them then and love them today. With the improvements to manufacturing and automation plus CNC machines the inflationary price equivalent should make the price less than what they charge today. Insatiable thirst for profit and simple greed is going to kill these companies in the long run.
Thank you for testing these.
Glad to see what I was told turned out to be true.
I would LOVE these. My ears hate the 1 - 2 kHz band and LOVE a kickdrum that feels in the chest. Also, dynamic range is king since I play at concert levels. 🤘🤘🤘
Awesome to see!! Was very interested in these, happy to see that these look pretty good.
I currently have a set of JBL 4311’s with a Marantz 2270 and they sound pretty good. I do have a set of the JBL L100 classic black edition on order, can wait to hear the updated drivers; especially that 12” woofer!! Thanks for your review.
Loud and not junk! 😋
Great review Erin! Thank you 🎖️
Thank you Erin for your wonderful work!
bot?
I have a pair of these hooked up to a pioneer Spec 1 pre amp and a Kenwood 700M amplifier. Fantastic! Listen primarily to jazz, funk and rock. Really nice. Did some work with room treatment for first and second reflections and a ceiling cloud because my space is small so I can only get about 8 inches from the side walls, no toe, just straight ahead and about 18 inches from the front wall. Sounds great.
Great speaker. I've got them with a little bit of EQ on both the 2k and 5k regions just to tame that bumps and make the speaker not 'so forward'
Yeah, I actually did the same through my WIIM ultra. Help tame some of those areas a little bit for that same reason. 👍
Great video and an excellent blend of data and subjective views 👍
Many thanks!
I have these speakers and for the cost I dont think they are the best. But the nostalgic look is what sells it for me and everyone else(IMO). Having said that, they do sound amazing to my ear, and I have it paired with two powered subs to complete the full range experience. JBL4Life.
Great review. I really want to see your review of the Audio First Fidelia. That looks mightily impressive.
It’s coming! It’s a great speaker. Definitely recommended.
@@ErinsAudioCorner I'm building the Fidelia right now and am excited to hear them. I'm glad you like them. Harry is a nice guy and I'm hoping Audio First is successful.
These are by far my favourite speakers. I also have the L26 and have owned hundreds of speakers that I resell. I Can never bring myself to sell these. Put a Phil Collins live CD and these speakers are just incredible. Btw mine are original with cloth grill that I never use
I have the little brother L-82 classics. Hope you get to review a pair of those. I'm very pleased with them, even after 2 years of listening.
To back up what Erin said, they can play very loud effortlessly as long as you feed them enough juice. 👍
They love a couple of amps!
Like any other decent speaker
these are sensitive so you don't need even 100W to get to hearing damage SPLs
@KofiBaffour-t8o They are fairly sensitive, but they are 4 ohm. It will require a 4 ohm stable amp to get the best performance.
Good video, that peak at 2 khz can be corrected by adding a LCR shunt on the crossover, also that dip at 600 hz can be corrected lowering the midrange low cut changing the value of the capacitor, it seems the designer of that speaker is a novice or doesn't know what he was doing, that speaker with a better designed crossover can give a much better response
Que up Danny at GR Research. Someone should send him a pair. The necessary upgrades might not be very expensive to take these to the next level.
@@rosswarren436 I was thinking the same, Danny maybe would do what I mention
I’d love to see you measure and review the very common Yamaha HS8.
Always wondered the pros & cons of my speakers. 🤔
[Klipsch has left the chat]
Great review 💯👍
Your credibility is 100% w/me Erin. I look for your review if I’m considering an audio purchase. I’m 71 and need to be extra careful with how I spend my money on a fixed income. I never make a decision based on measurements alone, but I like to see them as a starting point. These JBL L100’s measured better than I thought they would. I’ve always felt JBL gear was a little overpriced. I learn from your videos. I’m a music lover first and foremost. I’m not that analytical about every minute detail when listening to music. But I like above entry-level gear that fits my budget. I’d love to hear your thoughts on how this JBL model compares to the Super Denton. That’s a speaker I could consider if it sounds good to me. Different price points, but similar three-way offset driver array. The L100 Classic seems to be capitalizing on the “Nostalgia” angle.
I really like beautiful full midrange sounding speakers so i guess; these are not my type of cookies.
That aside, great review!
Great review! Is this speaker the same as their 75 Anniversary model?
Firstly. JBL was always an American Iconic Loudspeaker Manufacturer.
The #1 desired speaker to build a Hi-Fi system around.
Not to mention, most Classic Rock & Roll recordings & studios insisted on monitoring & editing sound tracks on !
JBL home speakers continued that tradition with gorgeous models to most entry levels.
I owned their highly appraised L-166 Horizon. The bookshelf speaker with their "Egg carton" grills ! I can go on & on. It wasn't perfect. But it too is an evolution from their previous icon L-100 Century.
I was elated to see JBL return to its roots with the current & new L-100.
There's just one, no two black eyes with them ? Price !! $5,000 usd is absurd.
Although! Their Special Edition piano black does have me staring at my bank account pondering ? LOL
$5K USD buys more than two box speakers. It buys American Heritage.
*I just hope & 🙏 they are still manufactured in California ?
I think they are made in Indonesia.
@CptMark Bummer. A 3rd reason to LOWER their asking prices.
They would move more units & possibly return production state side.
The crappy JBL logo products can remain abroad. Bring speaker production back home!
Whilst you type vigorously on a phone or device not made in the US. This isn't the 20th century@@jamiesmith6838
For the price of these, you can line your whole wall with some Magnat Transpuls or something, if you really want the "vintage style". 😂
Great review.....thanks.
These speakers are going to haunt me forever i guess.
I could have gotten a original set for $25 bucks at goodwill a few years ago but had no idea they are worth 💰.
I have a set of original L100A's that I believe were purchased in 1989, I'm glad to see the new model isn't just a vintage gimmick and performs great, when I'm ready to part with mine I'd love to send them for measurements
I have jbl studio monitors from the 80's. Tweeter is really hot, I have to attenuate it like 6db even off axis. I like the old school big bass driver and cabinets even though it makes room placement a bit difficult.
I would 100% audition these speakers if I had the room for them
I bought a pair of these speakers and took them back, way prefer my Boston A150’s… which still kick arse.
I am currently using the JBL 100 classics. After your review of The Source Point 888 I decided to purchase a pair. I hope they are positive upgrade. Your opinion would be much appreciated.
I 100% think you made the right choice. The MoFi aren’t simply more linear; they also better deeper bass extension. This comes at the cost of sensitivity but that’s the only noteworthy downside IMHO.
@ErinsAudioCorner thank you again really appreciate your feedback. I am new to your channel and I really enjoy it thoroughly. Finest review in my opinion.
Excellent and informative review!
Thank you kindly!
Do you prefer the JBL over
the Mofi Sourcepoint 888 ?
I’d take the MoFi. And cheap plug, if you order it please consider using this link that earns me a small commission (it works for the JBL, too):
howl.link/cmAQVKU2D3Z
Granada Hills-- How do these compare to the KEF Q 950 which i am running? 4Ohm Vs 8 and 8" vs 12" woofs?
Would you say someone who chooses this vintage design would miss the imaging performance as something like the Mofi 888 ?
I love the vintage, but my hunch is, since staging is my favorite attribute of 2-channel, I should stick to modern designs ??
Your thoughts ?
The crazy thing is that many reviewers report that the Linton image particularly well. Seems "rules of thumb" are sometimes broken.
@@rosswarren436 I guess the better question might be as well ? When stepping up in purchase, FOMO is real. Wonder if it's a safer bet to buy the 888 in hopes it's the right decision :) Making a safer bet in pursuit of an end game.
@@27b-6Buttle if the Mofi 888 are designed such that the woofers mounted below do all the bass heavy lifting (and movement) and the midrange around the tweeter doesn't move much, causing changes in the tweeter's response, then YES. That was the Achille's heel of both the SP10 and SP8. They were reviewed as being really good speakers, but Danny at GR Research did some tests showing that on the SP8, the position of the woofer around the tweeter can appreciably affect the response.
So, maybe Andrew Jones worked his magic on the 888 and addressed that issue.
Do note that fortunately or unfortunately, all speakers are made to a price point and usually it is the out of sight crossover components that suffer, leaving some performance on the table.
The bad thing is that it is that way, the good thing is that if you really want, you can fix it for an additional cost.
Good luck in whatever speakers you choose.
Been looking at these as my "end game" speakers with a subwoofer. Now I know which areas to EQ - BIG THANK YOU - And a big question (you knew someone would ask): These or the Super Linton, also with a subwoofer, in a 13' x 25' x 8' room? I know these are substantially larger but the Linton will play at 110 dB. The Super Linton are half the price of the L100 MkII. Did JBL miss the mark in not making the new L100 MkII mirrored pairs for better soundstage imaging?
Glad I could help!
1:33 this diagram looks like a dollar-store version of that famous Maxell tape ad. Which is appropriate, because the speaker in that ad is an L100!
AH! It shows up at around 5:00, I should have waited to have watched the whole vid before commenting 😅
Those kinds of box speakers with 12 inch woofers used to cost a couple hundred dollars back in the 80s. I know prices rise over the years, but $4800 seems ridiculous to me. Also, other reviewers have mentioned the build quality is not good, and the veneer started to peel after a relatively short amount of time.
Yeah I had a pair like that back in the '80s. In the '90s when I started buying higher quality electronics I realized they were pure garbage and ended up getting Magnepans. I was never impressed by JBL and I can't imagine why anyone would spend that kind of money on such an archaic design when there are so many awesome speakers available.
@@chrislj2890 I still have my circa 82’ $500 a pair Boston A150’s that I wouldn’t trade or sell for any new design.
I tickle them with a 76’ Yamaha CA-800 and have a very barely used 80’ Sansui AU-417 for backup.
. Lol..... Have you seen the JBL driver? Here's the part number.
JBL 2262HPL 338312-004X 12" Neo Woofer. That's a whole different universe than Grandpappy's stamped steel Realistics.
@@TriAmpMyFi,These are commercial transducers,not what’s OEM in the L100 3way Loudspeakers. The driver part may be listed incorrectly on your parts list.😮😮😮 ,Also check the manufacturer model year before you purchase parts.
FWIW a pair of L100 Century speakers was about $550 in 1971. That’s about $4200 in 2024. Given the parts quality and performance improvements made by the time we get to this generation of the L100, the price difference seems about right. I don’t know what speakers you’re citing were a couple hundred dollars in the 80s, but they were probably not very good.
"Measurements don't matter"
-guy with poopy speakers and tiny Peepee
A good test for viewer's listening environment: If you can hear the "voice isolation" plug-in Erin is using, then you have a decent set up. I personally think these "voice isolation" tools are counterproductive when applying them to dialogue that's recorded in a relatively isolated and controlled environment without much noise pollution. It cuts off just enough of the start and end of sentences to be annoying, especially as someone's natural inflections move up and down. I can hear that garble in the high frequencies, and when it kicks in too hard it just gets muffled, and the whole thing starts to sound unnatural. These plug ins are great if you're recording outdoors with lots of other noises going on around you and you don't have a good shotgun mic to really get good isolation. But please, if you're indoors with a good microphone, no need to use these plug-ins. Save yourself some time and headache.
I use one because I have kids in the house making a lot of noise. I usually try to film my videos early in the morning before they’re awake, but it doesn’t always work out that way. I backed off the gate on my more recent video. We’ll see how that works.
thank you sir
Brothers in Arms is my go to album to test any piece or changes made to my system!
It’s easily in my top 5.
A clean quality recording such as Brothers in Arms is likely to sound fairly good on most any stereo system, I'm not sure it tests much to show weaknesses in a speaker, just more of a familiar recording to listen and hear other equipment through. I owned the original mk1 JBL L100 Classics for a while, play some poor indie recordings through those JBL's or even some AC/DC or similar and that midrange and treble will probably be painful.
Erin, the sound that you described that stood out to you with these speakers is, as far as I know, that's the classic JBL sound .. anyway, that's the JBL sound I remember..(and yes, the controls get cranked lol)😂
@@ericjohnson829 I use it primarily because it is a great recording and I know it very well.
I have a set and I found out that it seems to sound the best when on the floor on a carpet. The stands are over rated. I found the transistor radio sound went away when on the floor.
i would like to see reviews of speakers with HDMI ARC and CEC volume control like the Argon Audio FORTE A5 MK2🥺
Erin, I have the klipsch rf711 and wanna ask would it be worth the expense and difference in sound quality to purchase these and sell my klipsch? I rarely make a comment or ask a question so from one wildcat fan to another ..what’s your opinion 😂
How does such a thick grill make sense..?
Ooo, that Fidelia looks like direct competition to Sierra-1 V2, with a tiny bit smaller woofer, and a lot more DIY work. And likely no refund option.
But … waveguide.
I get the feeling that the original, fast and clean L100s were significantly better.
They certainly had better cabinets.
You speak about the Centurys or the Classic MK1?
Im sure they sound great but there's no way I'd spend that much for essentially just some woofers and tweeters in a box. It looks like you can easily DIY a similar sounding speaker for a fraction of the cost
You can, if you know what you are doing extremely well - maybe have an engineering degree - and have acoustic tools (going to buy a Klippel like Erin?) or you buy a kit designed by someone who does, plus you have all the woodworking equipment, the space, and the time to devote to doing a very good job, then applying veneer to make it look good. You might have those resources, but many don't, and they can't justify the cost to buy all that needed equipment and maybe buy an outbuilding to set it up in. Think of all the people who rent homes or apartments and simply can't do a project like that. GR Research has their DIY and Brute "vintage looking" models. I'm sure they might even beat the JBL L100 MkII, but if you buy them built and finished with a nice veneer, the costs are roughly comparable. Most people can't justify DIY, hence they buy finished speakers. That's how these companies all stay in business.
Honestly, the sensitivity of the human ear to minute changes to the frequency response is astounding. Make a tiny change, and you hear it.
But if we can’t (aren’t able to currently) measure it and therefore quantify it, it doesn’t matter!!! 😏😎😇
@GoggleAX honestly I just do it by ear if it's not my studio monitors or something.
It is. But you have to make that change. If you don’t have a reference then these changes are harder to hear.
Whether that reference be a real time change or an A/B comparison. (Hopefully at least level matched)
Agree, with both of the above, in my opinion what doesn’t get enough attention, at least in what I read and watch, is the importance of the room and just how much impact the listening area makes, in addition to the the speakers physical setup / locations, which of course ALSO matter a great deal.
@@GoggleAX maybe another reviews. But I always take the time to make recommendations regarding distance from wall and aiming positions. 👍
A person's listening impressions
are inherently subjective, whereas data
is inherently objective !!
.?! enough said ?!😉
4ohm? Interesting. I have a pair of JBL-L166 Horizons from 1977, and they’re 8ohm. Is there some particular reason they went with 4ohm?
I'd be surprised if your L166 doesn't dip to 4 Ohm.
The Fidelia is a British DIY speaker that costs £950 but you're saying it's only $950 in the US?
I didn’t look up the conversion rate. How far off am I?
@@ErinsAudioCorner 25%...in USD the Fidelia costs around $1,200
That 12” woofer has good performance
Indeed!
your noise gate / expander / whatever you use for noise suppression is set too aggressively and sometimes cuts off the first/last bit of your words
Also, is it wrong to use speakers like the Forte 1 in a 250 sq ft room?
Would these speakers pair well with the JBL Classic L10cs subwoofer for extended sub-bass or is it better without the sub?
Same question . Anyone?
How big is your room dimensions wise?
How does someone arrive at a precise 10-30 degree toe in? do you need a protractor in your eyeballs?
They actually have apps for that sort of thing
@@ErinsAudioCorner Cool man of course there is I should of known 👍
Would you pair these with 'musical' subwoofers like the Rel t5x or just big output, an SVS. (Is the 'musical' subwoofer a myth). Another tangent, from watching many of your videos, I believe the Blade 2 metas are your favorite; do you believe the focal utopias compete? Meanwhile I'm a poor peasant here who bought a kef q concerto meta because of your review (new $1720 CAD, $1225 USD), with a KEF Kc62 subwoofer (also from your reviews). Am I missing a lot for a small room (400 sq ft)? When I went to hear the Blade 1 metas in store, it doesn't sound that different to me. But obviously super different if in my room. OH well (I listen to vocal music, pop, rap) Any thoughts on tube amps vs Wiim amp (bought wiim amp because of you too!)❤❤Haha, thanks a bunch Erin. I've spent tens of hours watching you
Music subs are a myth. Look at frequency response, resonances, and group delay.
I have owned a number of subs and use two 18” JTR subs for music. They have more detail and texture than any sub I have owned in the pass. The crazy output is just a bonus.
I've got the L100 paired with a SVS SB-1000 Pro (sealed) and they mix together beautifully.
I don’t think there’s anything “musical” about certain subwoofers. most of the time it just has to do with how low they get or if they are resident. Most of the time people attribute “musical“ to not having a lot of low frequency base that would otherwise make the room sound boom or peaky in certain frequencies. From what I’ve seen of REL subwoofers, they tend to not have much low frequency extension. this is most likely why some described them as musical. I’m more a fan of using a subwoofer that has good extension and pairing it with proper equalization to attenuate any room modes that are distracting. The above user mentioned SVS. That’s a good brand who has an app that will allow you to equalize the speakers response for your room. in my opinion, that’s the best way to go for a simple set up unless you use external equalization.
Some audiophiles make fun of JBL, but that company has some serious engineering chops. Thank you for reviewing this classic speaker.
Yeah about always never heard them either. lol.
Not talking about these but S line, M2, studio or Everest.
Or even their cinema speakers if you have a huge room.
It's funny in a way, because if anyone has attended a large venue concert in the last 40 years, then they likely have heard JBL (or Electro Voice) speakers.
5:12 maybe somewhat interestingly, the ad shows the speaker NOT pushed back against a wall. 😏🤔🤭
When marketing clashes with engineering. 😂
@@ErinsAudioCorner let’s not forget they were actually selling cassette tape
My sub woofer doesn’t make a peep anymore, maybe 15 years old, do they just die?
They definitely can.
an excellent, concise analysis of a newly revisited classic. if you've had time w/ the originals, do have you any opinion in comparison? "sounds" like JBL intended to revisit not only the look & features, but the acoustic, yet enable one to flatten them out on-the-fly if so desired. my experience (w/ L88Ps upgraded to L100 bitd) is that they sound best playing the music of the era (rock, baby!) when their older sister design was common in the studios. a sorta acoustical time machine for us ancient ones.
Unfortunately, I do not. It would be cool to do a comparison.
well Erin I don't think they're that bad, but at the same time, the price of $2400 EACH is a little steep, but, that said, if they're typically going to go for 20% or more discounted off of MSRP, then I guess it's OK
I keep waiting for that. It happened with the "new" L100 but only after a few years. Wish the L100 MkII would do the same, but probably not until late 2026. We'll see.
@ yeah that's seems to be the way things typically go ..
the first in line pay more .. goes towards funding the up front NRE costs that are incurred before the NPI. . anyhoo..that's how it goes with other tech hardware!😉
I don't know about the later ones, but early ones really don"t sound very good.
The 4311"s sure were used all over the place in 70s recording studios though.
Hmm another sad showing from JBL IMO. JBL has the capability to make amazing speakers and why they don’t hold that high standard for all their speakers, I will never understand.
Normally, I’m pretty tough on all manufacturers when the response isn’t linear. If you look back at my recent JBL stage two speaker review, you’ll see I went *really* hard on them for that. But with these I feel like they are intentionally designed to give off a “classic” sound and then they’ve provided a way for the user to make it more linear via the knobs.
@ I get and respect that. I like a smooth response based on my ownership history. Everything that was not smooth got sold off sooner than later.
@@ErinsAudioCorner that’s a good point because back in the day the West Coast sound that JBL was famous for had that carved out mid range but now at least they let you adjust that dip. Just way too overpriced.
Worst speaker I’ve heard has been the one with the flattest in room response. Lifeless, dull, just plane not nice.
Our hearing isn’t linear. At the average listening level of say 70db ish we need a bass and treble boost to hear a linear response.
Which is why all my preamps have tone and or loudness compensation circuits.
If speaker response automatically basically compensates for our non linear hearing it’s already a plus.
oh laaaaaaawwwwd. Of COURSE it sounded terrible. Because flat in-room sounds like garbage. That’s different than flat *anechoic*. Check out the video I made on this topic:
th-cam.com/video/_tnWB8Rl0Ms/w-d-xo.html
After seeing measurements Klipsch Forte 4 doesnt look that bad anymore:)😂
Cool shirt logo. Is that your own design? Available for purchase? Thanks!
It’s a friend of mine. He own a tuning company (car and home audio EQ work).
waveformtuning.com/?
Cerwin-Vega XLS15 will blow these JBL away at 1/3 the price.
I’m just not a fan of vintage speakers especially big square boxy looking ones.JBL has never peaked my interest and still don’t. Thank God we have choices. Keep up the good work.
I hear you. Some of them I like and some of them I don’t. There are definitely a lot of people who love them, but there are plenty of others who don’t. Like you said, it’s a good thing we have options. It’s a good time to be an audio geek for sure.
Did I hear that right $4,800? Unless they've changed a great deal since I've heard a pair I wouldn't want to listen to them even if they gave them away for free. Maybe that's just me but I didn't like them at all.
That’s correct. Current MSRP is $4800.
@@ErinsAudioCorner😂
i heard them a couple of times, it was a fun speaker but i can instantly notice the wood box sound and it distracts me, i can ear it´s lack of resolution also, but then again i have Magico S3 and so 99% of wood cabinets are instantly noticed by me. If i had a pair of this jbl i would find a way to dampen that box and maybe insert some bracing
I need those S3’s. What’s your address? I promise I won’t steal them.
🤞 😂🤷♂️
@ErinsAudioCorner I am in Lisbon, Portugal 😅 are you close enough? I have a rew measurements in my room if you want I can send them to you
@ hmmmm. I can make that drive. 😂
@@ErinsAudioCorner i dont have socials except linkdin but you can find me there under Goncalo Santos Carvalho then i can send some fotos of the magicos and also i can send you the rew file, best i can do :) without shipping 350lb of speakers across the world hehehe
I am certain that it was the one arm man.
So it seems - drivers are good, crossover is bad. Like the old L100s, if you measure each driver and engineer a totally new crossover, it will sound great.
That said, not everything can be fixed with the crossover, because the stupid midrangers are not flush mounted! It's mind-boggling that such an expensive speaker can have such a basic flaw.
I respect classics but f3 50Hz for 12 inch woofer in ported enclosure sounds like joke in 2024
In a few years that foam grill will get brittle and crumble just like the foam woofer surrounds from yesteryear.
I'm 4 years into ownership of the L100 Classics and the grills feel like they did when I bought them. JBL says they changed the foam and it will not go brittle like the original L100.
Not true today. The material is not the same. 40 years of material science, particularly the billions spent on plastics (Did you see 'The Graduate'?) have made a difference.
So old-skool the midrange is surface mount. WTF?
too pricey!!
great review!
Trick? At the price these sell in my country they should sound great with bad positioning, bad amp matching and a mediocre source
Also this speaker is overpriced for a Chinese JBL, I had the L150 which is much much better speaker
If these cost around $1200/pr I would buy them just for the looks and nostalgia. How is it when using with subs?
My only problem with this speaker, $2,400 a piece.
And Fyne Audio has some nice ones going for $6500/pair. Wharfedale has some for $9000. In Stereophile you can find reviews of speakers going for $69,000/pair like the Audiovector R 8 Arrete. Everyone wants quality sound. We just have to know when to get off the merry-go-round and buy something price and performance commensurate with our sources and amp (and our ears).
I heard these before and loved them. Then I went to look at the price tag and cried a little.
😂
Why measure loudspeakers? Use your ears. Waste of money. Made in Indonesia. Give me a pair of California made Jbl L112 and I am happy 🤗
Those L112’s were designed via measurement. I’ve had the designer on this channel. Greg Timbers. Look for it. 😎
@ErinsAudioCorner I understand that the producers use measurements when designing loudspeakers. But theres is no use for it on a daily basis. Thats why I say your ears are the best instrument. 🤓 I dont like the L100. I have heard them a lot of times in different setups. To expensive for what you get. Go vintage if you want good rock speakers. I have a small pair of L15 and they kick a.. 🎸🤗
@@legomandk9964 it's wild to me that you'd say all that while putting your trust into the designer but disregarding that he was on my channel for an interview (and I spoke with him last week) to discuss his designs and measurements' importance in evaluating the accuracy of the speaker. But you do you. ;)
@@ErinsAudioCorner You miss my point.🤗 No matter how many messurements you make. I dos not change the fact that its your perception of sound thats important.
What the designer says is not important to me. I live in Denmark where there are so many high end loudspeaker producers. So we are kind of spoiled regarding good sounding speakers.😉
Jbl have never been the speakers I go to for an audiofile experience. But when wanting to listen to my 1970-90 rock albums I use vintage Jbl speakers for maximum enjoyment.👍🏻🎸🤗
Between these and the new Bose , 🔥. Sorry bro!
I have some cool Bose stuff coming in soon. 😎😂
Underwhelming sound, extremely overpriced.
95% of sound systems are priced way above what they're worth.
Erin, I have the klipsch rf711 and wanna ask would it be worth the expense and difference in sound quality to purchase these and sell my klipsch? I rarely make a comment or ask a question so from one wildcat fan to another ..what’s your opinion 😂
Honestly, I don't know. I wish I had a better answer for you but I just don't have any experience with that particular model.
Also, GO BIG BLUE!
@@ErinsAudioCorner thanks for your honesty…love your channel and em wildcats too 😜👍🫡