it's an area of magic that was not well studied and so it's not surprising if odd things happen. (it's also convenient for the story writer because they can explain away odd things like that.)
I liked how the prophecy said that Harry and Voldermort had to kill each other, but it turned out that they were both keeping each other alive (Harry as the Horcrux, and Voldermort having Harry's blood). Kind of ironic.
so if harry had struck first and killed voldemort, the protection would have ran out because harry would have killed voldemort along with the part of him inside baldy, but voldemort would still have his hocruxes, so that prophecy was accurate that one must die first
Important: Book 4 - When Dumbledore learns that Voldemort took Harry's blood for his new body, Harry notices a hint of success in Dumbledore's eyes for just a second, but later thinks he imgagined it. -> Rowling set everything up in The Goblet of Fire.
The foreshadowing of Voldemorts downfall via using Harry’s blood was absolutely genius … I’ll never forget reading that line that Dumbledore had a look of “triumph” … which confused the ever loving shit out of me as a 13-14 year old lol
In the forrest, there were several things happening at the same time: 1 - The elder wand wouldn't act the way it should've. The cruciatus wasn't working anymore, Harry didn't feel pain while rising in the air, not because of the bloodspell. Bloodspell was present before, in the graveyard, and the curse was excruciating for Harry. But the wand Voldy was using back then was his, BEFORE the regurgitation of their wands and Harry's taking over Voldemort's wand. In the Forbideen Forrest, the wand had changed its allegiance and wasn't acting against Harry in slightest manner. 2 - The bloodspell in Voldemort's body. I think when Dumbledore says "while that enchantment survives, so do you", he does NOT mean that Harry lives as long as Voldemort does. He means as long as Voldemort lives, the enchantment protecting Harry from Voldemort, survives as well. Harry is mortal against others, not against Voldemort. 3 - When hit by the killing curse, the curse could act on TWO beings inside Harry (souls if you will) .... Harry & Voldemort's. Since the killing curse can kill a single being (you never see a killing curse bouncing off killing several people), the curse has to kill one of them. If Harry is killed ("damage beyond repair"), Voldemort's soul will die as well. But another way is to kill Voldemort's soul, and keep the container's soul alive. I think both (the wand assuming Harry as master, and Voldemort having Lily's protection in his body) played a role in the killing curse choosing the latter: destroying Voldemort's soul instead of taking Harry's life. I don't know if this makes sense or not. I always thought it's not a "single" thing that helped Harry survive.
You are right. Because of love protection in voldy's blood, the wand's loyalty for harry and the curse can only kill one soul at a time when it's spelled🙏🙏👏
Yooooo. You know what's weird? If Petunia died or something happened before the 16 years were over, Dudley would be the one protecting Harry because he had Petunia's blood.
When Harry tells Dumbledore that Voldemort used his blood and is able to touch him now it says dumbledore had a look of triumph in his eyes. I was always confused why, but now it makes sense. Everything fell into place exactly as he planned.
@@laurac4060 because if harry died he had nothing to tether him back to the living world but with his blood or I guess lily's blood inside Voldemort he acted like an anchor for harry so it doesn't matter how many times harry dies as long as Voldemort was alive he could always come back
@@johnhostetler2167 exactly in many ways, and I believe JK Rowling mentioned this in her own words, that Harry, unknowingly, had a reverse horcrux in Voldemort after he used his blood to revive himself. This allowed Lilly's Protective Charm to go into Voldemort, and act as a shred of goodness in him. however Voldemort chose to continue an evil path (not totally his fault, since he was conceived though a love potion and hence was never able to feel love) and still tried to kill Harry. In the Forbidden Forest, there were a few factors that made Voldy's killing curse attack his horocrux in harry, but the biggest one is Lilly's Protective Charm being in Voldemort, which means as Voldemort lived, Harry could not die. Now i am convinced this was JK Rowling's secret plot the who storyline: remember the prophesy saying "neither could die while the other lives?" and that Voldemort will "MARK" him as his equal" ? that along with the key detail mentioned by the OC saying how Dumbledore reacted positively when Harry told him how Voldemort used his blood, are key evidences that JK Rowling planned to have Voldemort bring his own downfall through Harry!! Such a genius Rowling is
Well he was the chief warlock of wizengamot plus the mugwump of international confederation of wizards so in the magic world,he is the one to have the last word specially in its judicial system. So he is more than just a qualified lawyer.
that’s just because Hermione stopped him. “Stop STOP sToP ✋. You’re going to take someone’s -EyE- sOuL oUt. Besides, you’re saying it wrong”. It’s KedAAvra , not KedavrAAA
I thought that basically, because a spell like Avada Kedavra usually only affects one person; that in the event that two souls have died - it would not be congruent with the rules of the spell and that gave Harry the choice to die as well, or return - given that the fragment of Voldemort's soul could not make that choice. Also I don't think that train station was Heaven, that was probably the place between life and death.
After seeing Snape memories scene, I think that the whole series went the way Dumbledore and Snape wanted it to. Everyone acted the way that they had planned. Its like they wrote the story accordingly for their plan to work. Even Voldemort was a dancing doll of their hands💀💀
@@kb4903 Dumbledore knew voldy was gonna try to get his hands on the wand, that's why he asked Snape to kill him so voldy thought Snape was the master of the Elder wand when it rly was Draco
@@joaocabo07 But he didnt expect Draco to disarm him did he? I thought it says something along those lines in the book. Please correct me if im wrong. You think he planned for Draco to be the unaware master? Harry being master was never part of it?
what even snape didn't realize is that dumbledore wasn't raising harry to be sacrificed like a pig when the time came. dumbledore knew if harry fell no one would be able to hold back voldy. that's why when the order of the Pheonix was fighting between themselves, they knew the best bet was to trust dumbledore. dumbledore understood everyone on a level they themselves didn't. convincing horace to come to hogwarts without which the horcrux thing wudn't have been understood. he also understood at some point snape wud be asked to make an unbreakable vow or similar thing by the death eaters to test his loyalty. maybe dumbledore really was death in the deathly hallows story. people die for what they live for.
Remember, in The Goblet of Fire when Harry told that his blood was taken for Voldemort's rebirth, "Harry thought he saw a gleam of something like triumph in Dumbledore's eyes".
I think the fact that the Elder Wand was loyal to Harry and not Tom also played some part in him survivivg the killing curse. It could still be the case of that the horcrux took the hit because the elder wand could not kill its master.
wrong. a regular wand would not be able to kill its master as the power within the wand that fuels the casting of the spell comes from the master. If the master is dying, the wand will loose the magic with which to cast the spell. the only exception is the elder wand which was built without this flaw bc it was built by death himself and had this shifting loyalty.
No it doesn’t really matter, if we follow the logic of the horcruxes and the feelings and how they affect people’s soul’s(lily protecting Harry with love etc) then I think it’s because there was another soul that needed to get destroyed first, thus leading to harry’s life getting speared. I don’t think it would’ve made a difference
I kinda love the Idea, that if Voldi would have used any other wand, Harry would be dead. But in the pursuit of ever greater power, he used the one wand, that was not able to kill Harry.
@@cvnsz Voldemort was very smart but this old magic always alluded him like with lily's protection he just couldn't understand it, he was so egotistical that he would look over little details like that because he thought he was better than that he thought he was invincible because of his power and he thought he was so smart that he had covered all his bases and never thought anyone else was smart enough to uncover them I mean he was so cocky that he thought he was the first and only person to find the room of requirement thinking he alone knew Hogwarts better than anyone he was definitely smart probably not very wise like you said but it was mostly his ego that got in his way he was never as careful or as thought out and planning like Dumbledore because he didn't think he needed to be he was blinded by ego and thought his power and knowledge would always win without fail even after it had failed miserably the night he tried to kill harry but he considered this a mistake that would never happen again but the second and last time it failed was again when he tried to kill harry again letting his ego blind him
@@johnhostetler2167 “That which Voldemort does not value, he takes no trouble to comprehend. Of house-elves and children's tales, of love, loyalty, and innocence, Voldemort knows and understands nothing. Nothing. That they all have a power beyond his own, a power beyond the reach of any magic, is a truth he has never grasped.”
So your telling me tht if Fred was there for a few more hours Harry’s love could’ve saved him I always thought it was cheesy to do this buuttttt.....thanks for the thousand likes ❤️❤️ I like to dedicate this to Fred😔
I would call the place where Harry and Dumbledore had their palaver "limbo" rather than heaven, especially because Voldemort was there, too (at least in the book). If Harry had decided to go on the train that went "on" he would have gone to heaven probably
I think that's Harry's perception of how he would go to heaven or stay back in the living world as a ghost, because Dumbledore said- "It is, as we say, your party" implying that it is Harry's imagination of how he would go to heaven- by taking a train. This imagination can also be a reference to the fact that Harry took the Hogwarts Express to go to Hogwarts, which felt to him like a heaven when compared to living with the Dursleys
You know, I kinda wish somehow Voldy found out about how the love protection spell continued. It would’ve been so satisfying seeing Voldy find out his brilliant plan to come back backfired in the ultimate way
Her act of sacrifice n love protected harry all these years along with The infamous Elder Wand. Sadly for voldemort, even if he used Lucius's wand,he still would hv died.
NEVILLE SAID " HARRY DIDN'T DIE IN VAIN. HIS HEART BEAT FOR US. FOR ALL OF US " AND HE WAS BRAVE AS HIS PARENTS SO PULLED OUT THE SWORD OF GODRIC GRYPHINDOR
If you mean the one Bellatrix cast just before Molly said the greatest line in the entire series and then went on to prove that no one lives when mama bear goes into kill mode no Bellatrix’s aim just sucked she missed.
I always thought that Harry didn’t die because he was the master of the Elder Wand at the time. In the book, it says “the Elder Wand must always win duels for its owner.” So I thought that when Voldemort killed Harry with the Elder Wand, the wand chose not to kill Harry because it cant’t kill its owner
Dungus Glumbus I think in this channel's video about the Deathly Hallows, just as you've said, "the Elder Wand must always win DUELS for its owner," so the wand didn't kill its master when they DUELED after the scene at the forest. When Harry was in the forest, however, it wasn't a duel. He went there without an intent of wielding his wand at hand, but to willingly give up his life. Therefore, it wasn't technically a "duel".
Even after that he still couldn't defeat Harry in a fight the theory in this video is half bake the elder wand will never allow to kill it's master even Harry say that in the end that the wand is dening voldy to use spell on his master
@@FMeister94 a lot of the fan theories are so well thought out and put together I can totally agree. If jk Rowling watches any of the theory videos I’m sure she sees missed opportunities
How is this plot armor? Plot armor is something that exists out of no where and just to save the main character, this isnt plot armor you doughnut, it was clearly thought and not plot armor. You could argue that "Omg the protection itself is plot armor" No! It was an excellent play on toms part that allowed him to touch harry but turned out to be his downfall
@@aaacaaaaaab i like your answer. I've read the books 5-10 times. And the last year I've been listening to them. Think I've listen like 16 times now. And you're absolutely correct, this was though through 👍
Harry doing what his mother did and creating a love shield for the ENTIRE WIZARDING WORLD is not only a fantastic full-circle moment, but Harry’s best moment. It’s so overlooked 😭
The reason he didn’t die was because Voldemort didn’t say the curse correctly! He said, “VANILLA BANANAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!” Edit: Is my most liked comment on TH-cam really about Voldemort craving pie.
So, when Lily sacrificed herself for Harry, she inadvertently placed the equivalent of a protection charm on him. But this charm had several caveats: The protection would only work so long as he was under the care of someone who shared Lily's blood, which is why he was made to live with Petunia. In addition, the protection would only last until Harry's sixteenth birthday. Not the sixteenth anniversary of Lily's sacrifice, but the actual day Harry turned 16. Later, Voldemort was reborn with Harry's blood, and therefore Lily's, inside of him. This somehow extended Lily's protection past his sixteenth birthday, and freed up the requirement for Harry to be under the care of the individual carrying Lily's blood. So, from Voldemort's reincarnation during Goblet of Fire until his defeat in Deathly Hallows, Harry was effectively immune from death and there were no stakes. For a less convoluted explanation, consider: Harry was, at this point, the master of the elder wand. When Voldemort struck him with the killing curse, it refused to kill its master and instead killed the part of Voldemort that lived inside of him. Same as in their final duel.
@@lukasd6546 exactly, not every single minute detail is provided of the world. Hence the extent of some explanations and possibilities could go beyond your comprehension since it's a wizarding world. You talk as if you live in there knowing it's scientific and magical limits lol.
me too, because at that point he owns the cloak of invisibility, the resurrection stone and without realising it, the elder wand. and after he comes back to life he explains to voldemort that the wand isn’t truly his while they’re fighting, so harry probably realised himself that he had became the master of death.
@@ricedonut6567 It doesn't - The whole thing with Harry's blood was foreshadowed at the end of the 4th Book. Love is and has been a concept throughout all seven of books, rather than a stupid concept that was introduced in the last book.
@@kanavwastaken The foreshadowing in the Goblet of Fire doesn't justify how it saved Harry from death. The blood used to resurrect Voldemort are of Harry's, the very same one with Lily's protection. If memory serves, it's effectiveness should of worn off the moment Harry came of age. As Harry's protection is gone, so should the one on Voldemort's veins. The Deathly Hallows has, and still makes more sense. The Wand to inflict death The Stone to reverse death The Cloak to evade death Together, they make one the master of death. And there's a reason why this fan theory was widely accepted by many despite it not being canon and debunked by Rowling herself. As you said, love had been the concurrent concept all throughout the books that I don't deem it necessary to reinforce it with the seventh book's title. Other than that, when it comes to the idea of love in the HP franchise, many people were too focused on Lily and Snape that they tend to forget to grasp the bigger picture, and that Harry, Dumbledore, and many other characters are able to express their love as well. The Deathly Hallows book still portrayed love through Harry's sacrifice in the hopes of not only protecting everyone, but also to destroy the Horcrux, all were from an act of love. It is also symbolic in a way, Harry mastering the Deathly Hallows kinda projects how love triumphs over death, or above all else in general, even magic.
So the reason why no one else died fighting once Harry came back is because he put the same protection on everyone that his mother gave him wow I never knew that thank you for making this video!
Well I think that's because Harry wanted to see people for whom he used to feel protected. That he'd be protected from all the harm. He knew he'd die, so he remembered the people who protected him from dying before. His parents, his godfather, his teacher.
I think he couldnt hurt him at that point either way, but ive also wondered, if he couldnt like destroy trees and make debree fly towards harry impaling him or something, instead of using avada kedavra, i wondered if it would dodge the loving spell aura Harry had. But i doubt it. Just the actions of Voldemort himself, i feel, couldnt even hurt Harry at that point. Not only he had his mother's spell, but he doubled it by sacrificing himself in the forest and Elder Wand, which Voldemort used, was probably very hesitant, while conjuring spells against its own master - Harry.
I’m writing this before you explain it, my idea which I’ve heard somewhere it that: in Goblet of Fire, when Voldemort took Harry’s blood, he got Lily’s protection inside his blood now. So when Voldy tried to kill Harry in the forest, both the horcrux and Harry died. However, given Voldy was still alive, so was Lily’s protection. So Harry survived, but the horcrux remained dead
@@clicktilldie7774 That's true, but when the explanations are given _after_ events...it's still deus ex machina. By way of contrast, the whole "wand chooses the wizard" is established in the first book and becomes a vital plot point in books 6 and 7.
I think the bigger question is, why didnt Voldemort actually check to see if Harry was indeed dead? Like just shoot another AK at him just to make sure. Would have been game over.
he was fainting after struck that killing curse on Harry, it was really strange and he doesn't understand what just happened, and after that he was scared for his life, afraid to touch Harry thinking that it would be endangered his life, even his death eaters that surrounded him was shocked and no one was brave enough when Voldemort ask them to check if Harry is really dead, Narcissca was force by Voldemort to check Harry because he despised the Malfoy family after they failed so many task, and it finally played for Harry advantage because Narcissca straightly lied to Voldemort just so she could go to the castle and take draco away.
Voldy used Avada not Avda but this was the first mistake The second mistake was he sounded Vanila Bananaaaa so harry was sent into a sweet dream with Dumbledore..😁
This was literally explained in the book. How are people still questioning it...? Non-readers, I give a pass, because the movie didn't explain anything, but how can readers still be confused...?
@@youdontneedtoknowwhoiam6640 I suggest you read it again. She gets hit by a killing curse while in the cage, dies, and when the sidecar falls, Harry blows it up. I literally just looked it up again to make sure. "Harry spat blood out of his mouth, pointed his wand at the falling sidecar, and yelled, “Confringo!” He knew a dreadful, gut-wrenching pang for Hedwig as it exploded"
This is my favorite part of goblet of fire. When Harry returns to Hogwarts and tells dumbledore what happened, there’s a fleeting moment where dumbledore has triumph in his eyes, because he knows after Tom took Harry’s blood, he sealed his fate, as long as they destroyed all of his horcruxes. Brilliant little bit she added in that book, it all fits together so well.
Who would win: Voldemort, someone who worked years to be feared, to achieve what he wanted to do, killed many people, was a complete terror that almost no one could stop, or THe POweR oF loVE
Im guessing when your a witch or wizard you can perform magic without even realising it, lily knew what was going to happen, she knew that she wasn't going to stand aside, im guessing love is the reason Harry was protected and lily probably didn't know it would actually work
Depends on how you see interaction with those who've gone before us. Lilly (and James et al) can't be brought back to life, but it doesn't mean they can't share awareness if Divine permission is granted to them. IMO the vision of Erised was no more than wishful thinking on Harry's part but the dead did seem to consciously interact with Harry both in the cemetery and in the forest; also Harry interacted with the spirit of Dumbledore after his own "death." I can't recall where Dumbledore said the death was another adventure (I know Gandalf did, lol) but to answer your second question, I'm sure she did. As Jesus said, paraphrasing, blessed is he who gives his life for another.
Man, 2019 feels like yesterday. Amazing to think that 5 years have already gone by. Used to watch your videos back then, maybe i'll check out some of your new content.
Is it just me or 3:40 was just so cute Dumbledore said to Harry that there’s a mark on him and Harry reaches his hand to the mark on his forehead and Dumbledores like no no 🥺
noooooo. Lily’s protection was in harry’s blood. Harry’s blood was used to make voldy come back. Lily’s protection was in both body’s. Harry was accidentally a Horcrux. Voldy didn’t know. Harry understood he had to be killed by voldy to kill him too. Voldy said AvAdA kEdAvRa and Harry “died”. He woke up in some sort of weird world where Dumb was and they talked and harry understood. Because lily’s protection in voldy’s body it was also still in harry’s body so as long as voldy lived harry would live to. But otherwise (as long as harry lived voldy would live too) can’t be anymore because voldy destroyed the horcrux by AvAdA kEdAvRa’ing Harry so Harry would win. Tadaaaaaaa
It was limbo. Harry could choose whether he wanted to die or go on. He decided to go on, but didn't take the part of voldemort with him and simply left it behind, dead.
I always thought it was because, as the Elder Wand was loyal to Harry, it wouldn't have killed its rightful master, but instead only the part within Harry that wasn't Harry (the piece of Voldemort's soul).
Yeah that's it. Remember even Harry's sister wand could only wound and not fatally harm him because they both had a feather from the same phoenix. The dursley home wasn't even his home anymore when this happens. I think it's as simple as you say, people love to complicate things.
@@jozefhrin2034 bcoz the horcrux is a part of Voldemort's... not Harry Potter's... btw... the horcrux should die bcoz JKR must end the story... 😂😂😂 otherwise Harry Potter movies will go like teledramas😜
this whole comment just shows how The Movie did not explain the Dumbledore's explanation correcty while in the King Cross Station, and how people who didnt read the books fret more than those who read
@@Lucky-gu8ry exactly. The movies frustrated me cos am hp books reader n they just screwed up characters n twisted lot of things. I had read all the parts like tons of times n the only parts worth mentioning are the first 3 movies
Wait… Maybe I’m missing something. If Harry’s protection should have ended when he was 17, shouldn’t all traces of his mother’s blood have stopped protecting him, including Voldemort’s blood? If not, and if Lily’s blood running through Voldemort’s veins was enough to protect Harry, why wouldn’t the very existence of Petunia be enough to keep Harry safe? Also, since it was technically Harry’s blood that was used when Voldemort gained his new body in GOF, shouldn’t the blood running through Harry’s own veins have kept him safe?
Harry's love protection didn't end at 17, however his protection at Privet Drive 4 ended when he turned 17. Meaning that Lily's protection was still a part of Harry and then a part of Voldemort when he used Harry's blood (Which is why he could touch Harry but also ironically why he could never kill Harry)
The protection ending when Harry turned 17 wasn't due to an "expiration date" on Lily's blood magic. It stayed in effect as long as Petunia was his guardian, which she ceased to be the moment he became an adult in the wizarding world. When Harry gave himself over in the Forbidden Forest, he put his life in Voldemort's hands, thus making someone with Lily's blood responsible for him again. If Voldemort had used the killing curse without Harry making that choice, Harry would've died.
@@damned0wl That's sort of a rubbish explanation. Harry himself has Lily's blood so by the same logic he'd be fine regardless. At this point you'd literally be making shit up to try make your idea work.
Theories that make way more sense than what is cannon. 1. Harry is the true owner of all the deathly Hallows making him the master of death 2. The elder wand would not kill it's own master and so didn't kill harry but the part of harry that was Voldemort 3. Harry used the resurrection stone on himself before being killed. I don't like what Rawling says is cannon because it makes the whole "we need the blood of harry so Voldemort can actually deal with him" completely redundant. If Dumbledore knew all of this why did we have to scheme and hide and so many people have to die? Why not send 14 year old harry to kill Voldemort? Voldemort can't defeat harry EVER due to sharing blood. It just makes the whole war pointless when this could have been taken care of as soon as it started. Harry had no reason to fear.
it's possibility that the fact Harry will not die because Voldemort had his blood was a guess Dumbledor himself told Harry after Harry was hit by killing curse that most things he did was a guess work so he couldn't just take the risk Voldemort could touch him now and dumbledor was t sure of Voldemort created horvroxes It was revealed he guessed when Harry told him that Tom riddle appeared out of diary but not sure and of he did then howsmy That is why he forced Harry to get memory from Slughorm He destroyed ring but again the only reason could be that he was guessing it's horcrox So if he wasn't sure about horcrox and blood protector why risk Harry's life since Voldemort could touch him now
So is there any explanation as to why Lily's sacrificial protection, which is supposed to run out when he becomes an adult (17 in the WW), randomly just doesn't after Voldemort takes some blood? Should it not have just expired anyway?
@@schwubdiwuub As I understand it, Lily's protection itself didn't expire. Even Dumbledore says in the Philosopher's Stone that, "love as powerful as your mother's for you, even though the person who loved us is gone, will give us some protection forever." You're forgetting, however, that Dumbledore also invoked a magic that I guess piggybacked off of Lily's sacrifice, meaning that even Voldemort couldn't touch Harry while he was wherever Petunia was. That's the part that was supposed to expire when Harry turned seventeen. Even Voldemort mentions in Goblet of Fire that "Dumbledore invoked an ancient magic to insure the boy's protection as long as he is in his relations' care."
The protection ending when Harry turned 17 wasn't due to an "expiration date" on Lily's blood magic. It stayed in effect as long as Petunia was his guardian, which she ceased to be the moment he became an adult in the wizarding world. When Harry gave himself over in the Forbidden Forest, he put his life in Voldemort's hands, thus making someone with Lily's blood responsible for him again. If Voldemort had used the killing curse without Harry making that choice, Harry would've died.
"When harry died, his sacrifice gave his allies the same protection" those some mlg moves right their Voldemort; "Kills harry" Harry comes back to life now his allies have the protection aswell Voldemort;"...shit"
@I Am Who I Am serious (can’t spell his name), Dumbledore,lily and James potter, lupin, tonks and Fred are all dead,their not main characters but the point is that there were all heroes that died but not the main ones (but if you are talking about main ones,yes you are right
@@sirgalahad1376 Yeah this stuff is explained in the book, Harry asks Voldemort if he noticed that all of his spells have been bouncing of everyone in their little argument before Harry kills him.
I’m still a little confused- how was Voldemort able to touch Harry Potter if the protection spell lived in Voldemort? The spell was strong enough to save Harry from death but not by Voldemort’s touch?
Consider my mind blown! I really hung on to the theory that death was pulling the strings as he was affronted by Voldemort's use of horcruxs to escape him, and that's why Harry was able to return from death. I think this explanation works really well too though and you made a really convincing argument for it.
so basically harry was competently invincible whilst Voldemort was alive, even if Voldemort had beaten harry again in the last dual harry would've just gotten up and come back again... right
As fas as I remember , the books (maybe) said that horcrux ix all about ripping apart your soul and storing in it someplace else... And when voldy tries to kill harry when he was a baby , the spell backfires because of the protection , voldy's soul rips apart ( whatever was left of it) and a part went into harry to stick (because whatever living thing it could find. ). And also that love protection theory of this video. that love protection was meant for only harry all along. So that's why when it accidentally was transferred to voldy in his new body, the enchantment lived on, (it didn't have any getting over when the carrier is 17 clause in voldy's case cause well voldy is more than 17.), When enchantment found harry in trouble, it worked because it was meant for him. Hence it let the horcrux die and let harry live. Maybe that's why harry was an accidental horcrux.
I honestly think this is a huge overthinking. He didn’t die because he used the deathly hallow of resurrection. He didn’t use it to revive his family members, he just talked to them symbolically, which is why they’re still dead.
Actually, that’s what many people mistakenly think, but the resurrection stone didn’t have anything to do with it… J.K.Rowling once explained, how Harry came back to life: _Again, Voldemort violated deep laws of magic he did not understand, but there is more to it than that._ _Having taken Harry’s blood into himself, Voldemort is keeping alive Lily’s protective power over Harry. So Voldemort himself acts almost like a Horcrux for Harry - except that the power of Lily’s sacrifice is a positive force that not only continues to tether Harry to life, but gives Voldemort himself one last chance (Dumbledore refers to this last hope in chapter 35). Voldemort has unwittingly put a few drops of goodness back inside himself; if he had repented, he could have been healed more deeply than anyone would have supposed. But, of course, he refused to feel remorse._ _Voldemort is also using the Elder Wand - the wand that is really Harry’s. It does not work properly against its true owner; no curse Voldemort casts on Harry functions properly; neither the Cruciatus curse nor the Killing Curse. The Avada Kedavra curse, however, is so powerful that it does hurt Harry, and also succeeds in killing the part of him that is not truly him, in other words, the fragment of Voldemort’s own soul still clinging to his. The curse also disables Harry severely enough that he could have succumbed to death if he had chosen that path (again, Dumbledore says he has a choice whether or not to wake up). But Harry does decide to struggle back to consciousness, capitalises on Lily’s ‘escape route’, and pulls himself back to the realm of the living._ _It is important to state that I always saw these kinds of magic (the very deepest life and death issues) as essentially un-scientific; in other words, there is no “Elder Wand + Lily’s Blood = Assured Survival” formula. What count, ultimately, are Harry and Voldemort’s own choices. They have each been given certain weapons and safeguards, but the power of these objects and past happenings lie in how they are understood, and how they are used or enacted upon. Harry has a deeper and truer understanding of the meaning of the objects and past events, but his greatest powers, those that save him, are free will, courage and moral certainty._ So, you see; the resurrection-stone had in fact nothing to do with it. He couldn’t actually have anything to do with it either, because Resurrection stone does not actually bring back the dead. The stone doesn't reverse death, it gives the user a hollow imprint of someone's soul. It seems to be better than a ghost, but far less than a human as these imprints can only be seen by the user. Also, Harry couldn’t ressurect _himself_ with it, not even as a hollow imprint. So, you might ask now: „What was the purpose of the resurrection stone, if not to actually resurrect Harry?!“ I am going to try to explain this to you: In Deathly Hallows Chapter 34, Harry found out through the memories of Severus Snape that he himself was the last Horcrux, so he decided to sacrifice himself. On his way to the forbidden forest, where Voldemort and the deatheaters were, he gets to open the snitch and to use the resurrection stone. He uses it to temporarily „bring back“ shades of his parents, Sirius Black, and Remus Lupin. Their presence was enough to give him the courage to keep going, and they remained with him until he made his way to where Voldemort was. Besides comforting him when he was terrified and hardening his resolve, their spectral form visible only to him acted as Patronus' to get past the Dementors allied with Voldemort that were inside the forest. So, the resurrection stone was not pointless, but actually very useful for Harry. Without the resurrection stone he probably couldn’t get to the point when he meets Voldemort in the forest, because he wouldn’t have been comforted and encouraged and he also wouldn’t get past the dementors. The reason why Dumbledore gave Harry the stone through the snitch is because Dumbledore actually planned Harry’s sacrifice from the beginning on (that’s why people criticize him, for basically seeing Harry as a „pig for slaughter“). And Dumbledore knew, that Harry would need some help. He knew, that Ron and Hermione would help him, such as the Weasleys, Minerva, and many other of his friends. But they would never encourage him, to sacrifice himself. So Dumbledore gave him the snitch with the resurrection stone in it, as he was sure, that those who already died can encourage and accompany him in this particular moment. I hope you could understand that🙈 Sorry for the long text…😅 Have a blessed day 🙋♀️☺️
He should have asked lily nicely. 😂 Just go and make an unbreakable vow with Harry and his parents that none of them would attempt to kill him. You know, in exchange of sparing the child? Do the same with Neville, and bam! Prophecy is false.
I actually really loved it when the books said that the Elder Wand didn't want to kill Harry (because he is the Wand owner) but instead it turned around and killed Voldemort
The wand, as Tom started the killing curse, left his hand, turned in mid air and said "No". Wand then crept backwards towards it's rightful master and lay comfortably in Harry's hand.
Thank you! I was rereading the books and after the part where they explained that his protection was lifted once Harry no longer called the Dursleys place home , I needed this explanation to understand how he survived.
6:00 Wait, you say if the protection wasn't in Voldemort blood, Harry would have been killed along with the horcrux. But Voldemort casts the curse with the elder wand, that in this moment of the story is Harry's. So it would never harm his true master. Given that, I always thought that the curse, casted with Harry's wand, couldn't kill him and so it killed the only living thing it found: the horcrux.
@@thegamershadowz-marcus8915 cuando Lily murió, Harry quedó protegido de la muerte a manos de Voldemort, pero sólo por una única vez, ya que su madre estaba muerta. Dumbledore extendió esa protección para que funcionara en la casa de los Dursley, al ser simultáneamente el hogar de Harry y el lugar donde se encontraba la sangre más cercana a Lily: Petunia (por eso Harry fue dejado allí y no con cualquier familia mágica que quisiera adoptarlo). Al cumplir 17 y alcanzar, por lo tanto, la mayoría de edad, la casa de los Dursley ya no podía funcionar realmente como hogar de Harry, y la extensión del hechizo protector ya no tenía ningún efecto.
You could say that what saves harry is snape's love for lily, since he asked voldemort to spare her life and that's what created the opportunity for her to sacrifice herself. Voldemort, in a somewhat human gesture to his most important servant, gave her the chance to not die, but she still put's herself in front of harry and that's what makes the whole love spell works. Kinda crazy how intricate this whole shenanigan is.
Dobby was unaware of that magic being active for Harry, only reason why he wanted to keep Harry home was because he knew that was the most likely place he’d be untouched should the chamber be opened being that Harry would be far away from the school.
> horcruxes are some of the most advanced and complicated dark magic
> voldemort creates one by accident
it's an area of magic that was not well studied and so it's not surprising if odd things happen. (it's also convenient for the story writer because they can explain away odd things like that.)
Because he is the most evil wizard all time?
Lmfao
szhzs *cue Curb you enthusiasm theme*
YUP
Voldemort: Avada Kedavra
Lily's protection: I'm gonna ruin this man's whole career
Tom must have a really clean carrier
Career*
That statement has whole other meaning
Nah. The effect of the protection went away after the goblet of fire
😂😂😂😂
Voldemort : Avada Kedavra
Harry Potter : pOwEr oF LoVe
Then Voldemort sings:
WhAt iS lOvE?
A force from above,
Cleaning my soul!
@@awugii Harry then sings: baby don't hurt me , don't hurt me no more
@@leekent3587 [Chorus]
WHAT IS LOVE?BABY DONT HURT ME,DONT HURT ME,NO MORE
Gxulia Yt Snape on backing vocals 😂
I liked how the prophecy said that Harry and Voldermort had to kill each other, but it turned out that they were both keeping each other alive (Harry as the Horcrux, and Voldermort having Harry's blood). Kind of ironic.
so if harry had struck first and killed voldemort, the protection would have ran out because harry would have killed voldemort along with the part of him inside baldy, but voldemort would still have his hocruxes, so that prophecy was accurate that one must die first
Important: Book 4 - When Dumbledore learns that Voldemort took Harry's blood for his new body, Harry notices a hint of success in Dumbledore's eyes for just a second, but later thinks he imgagined it. -> Rowling set everything up in The Goblet of Fire.
Exactly my thought!
Awkward Alan omg Yea!!!!!!!!'
Wow!
That gleam of triumph is really one of the most subtle hints
OH
Okay that sent shivers through me damn JK Rowling well played
*Harry after realizing he has to choice to stay alive:* Sighh I have to go back haven’t I?
Honestly that’s such a mood in 2020
Ikr
I wish I could do the killing curse on me self
@@dripfoe9569 IM PEEING YEAH
I had a stroke reading this
💯
Voldemort: AvAdA KeDaVrA
Harry: UnO rEvErSe CaRd
Voldemort: Disintegrates like he just went into a paper shredder
Caleb Smith 😂
Sahar Moghnieh 😑
Snapped by Thanos
"I dont feel so good"
Nani 🤯
The foreshadowing of Voldemorts downfall via using Harry’s blood was absolutely genius … I’ll never forget reading that line that Dumbledore had a look of “triumph” … which confused the ever loving shit out of me as a 13-14 year old lol
EXACTLY!
Which line in which book is this? Goblet of Fire??
@@bigppenergy1875Yup. I remember reading it thinking "is Dumbledore a villian?" haha
In the forrest, there were several things happening at the same time:
1 - The elder wand wouldn't act the way it should've. The cruciatus wasn't working anymore, Harry didn't feel pain while rising in the air, not because of the bloodspell. Bloodspell was present before, in the graveyard, and the curse was excruciating for Harry. But the wand Voldy was using back then was his, BEFORE the regurgitation of their wands and Harry's taking over Voldemort's wand.
In the Forbideen Forrest, the wand had changed its allegiance and wasn't acting against Harry in slightest manner.
2 - The bloodspell in Voldemort's body. I think when Dumbledore says "while that enchantment survives, so do you", he does NOT mean that Harry lives as long as Voldemort does. He means as long as Voldemort lives, the enchantment protecting Harry from Voldemort, survives as well. Harry is mortal against others, not against Voldemort.
3 - When hit by the killing curse, the curse could act on TWO beings inside Harry (souls if you will) .... Harry & Voldemort's. Since the killing curse can kill a single being (you never see a killing curse bouncing off killing several people), the curse has to kill one of them. If Harry is killed ("damage beyond repair"), Voldemort's soul will die as well. But another way is to kill Voldemort's soul, and keep the container's soul alive. I think both (the wand assuming Harry as master, and Voldemort having Lily's protection in his body) played a role in the killing curse choosing the latter: destroying Voldemort's soul instead of taking Harry's life.
I don't know if this makes sense or not. I always thought it's not a "single" thing that helped Harry survive.
vahidmirkhani i’ve been thinking exactly the same thing, multiple factors played important roles, i think you’re absolutely right
Vahidmirkhani yess.. you gave very appropriate reason
Good reasoning...it just shows how well planned Harry Potter series is 😍😍😍
#3 Is a really good analysis of how the killing curse would work against the victim and the victim housing a horcrux.
You are right. Because of love protection in voldy's blood, the wand's loyalty for harry and the curse can only kill one soul at a time when it's spelled🙏🙏👏
Bellatrix: Avada Kadavra!
Snape: avada kadavra...
Voldemort: AHHHHHVAAADAAAAKAAADAAVRAAAA
Stop stop your gonna take someones eye out besides your saying it wrong
I always heard Havadakedavra.. Maybe it's because of the hungarian dubbing 😅
Hermione: it’s Levioosa
Stole this from another video
😂😂😂😂😂
Yooooo. You know what's weird? If Petunia died or something happened before the 16 years were over, Dudley would be the one protecting Harry because he had Petunia's blood.
he was protected as long as he called privet drive his home and planned on returning
You are genius
But then how was Dudley alive??
@@khadija-ye6ib what?
@@khadija-ye6ib *facepalm* she can give birth and die a few years later
When Harry tells Dumbledore that Voldemort used his blood and is able to touch him now it says dumbledore had a look of triumph in his eyes. I was always confused why, but now it makes sense. Everything fell into place exactly as he planned.
But why the protection lived in Voldemort and not in Harry?
@@laurac4060 exactly, it doesn’t make sense
@@laurac4060 because he had harry's blood
@@laurac4060 because if harry died he had nothing to tether him back to the living world but with his blood or I guess lily's blood inside Voldemort he acted like an anchor for harry so it doesn't matter how many times harry dies as long as Voldemort was alive he could always come back
@@johnhostetler2167 exactly in many ways, and I believe JK Rowling mentioned this in her own words, that Harry, unknowingly, had a reverse horcrux in Voldemort after he used his blood to revive himself. This allowed Lilly's Protective Charm to go into Voldemort, and act as a shred of goodness in him. however Voldemort chose to continue an evil path (not totally his fault, since he was conceived though a love potion and hence was never able to feel love) and still tried to kill Harry. In the Forbidden Forest, there were a few factors that made Voldy's killing curse attack his horocrux in harry, but the biggest one is Lilly's Protective Charm being in Voldemort, which means as Voldemort lived, Harry could not die. Now i am convinced this was JK Rowling's secret plot the who storyline: remember the prophesy saying "neither could die while the other lives?" and that Voldemort will "MARK" him as his equal" ? that along with the key detail mentioned by the OC saying how Dumbledore reacted positively when Harry told him how Voldemort used his blood, are key evidences that JK Rowling planned to have Voldemort bring his own downfall through Harry!! Such a genius Rowling is
Dumbledore must be a qualified lawyer to find that loop hole with aunt petunia and extending the protection
Well he was the chief warlock of wizengamot plus the mugwump of international confederation of wizards so in the magic world,he is the one to have the last word specially in its judicial system. So he is more than just a qualified lawyer.
that’s just because Hermione stopped him.
“Stop STOP sToP ✋. You’re going to take someone’s -EyE- sOuL oUt. Besides, you’re saying it wrong”. It’s KedAAvra , not KedavrAAA
Read the books
@@genoco8321 dood I was kidding
Uh huh I feel sad for this muggle who couldn’t get your comment in the reference of ‘ Windardium Leviosa ‘
@@shershah5318 :)
well in this case. someone's soul out!
“Why isn’t Harry dead?”
Because Voldemort jinxed it when he yelled “Harry Potter is dead!”
Geroldy he really did
Be cuz voldemot though that he kild harry but he didn't and harry has the whod and the rock and the kiloc deal hallows duuu
Brianna Williams first i dont understand what you’re saying, second Have you watched this vid at all?!
Brianna Williams not to be rude or anything, but can you spell? im sorry if i sound rude
Yep you screwed yourself voldy
I thought that basically, because a spell like Avada Kedavra usually only affects one person; that in the event that two souls have died - it would not be congruent with the rules of the spell and that gave Harry the choice to die as well, or return - given that the fragment of Voldemort's soul could not make that choice.
Also I don't think that train station was Heaven, that was probably the place between life and death.
True, it wasn't heaven, since jk confirmed that Voldemort stayed on that place as that gross baby thingy suffering for eternity under the chair
Yeah I’m pretty sure the train station is limbo.
It was a version of Limbo, from what I've read 🤔
Like a limbo
you mean limbo?
After seeing Snape memories scene, I think that the whole series went the way Dumbledore and Snape wanted it to. Everyone acted the way that they had planned. Its like they wrote the story accordingly for their plan to work. Even Voldemort was a dancing doll of their hands💀💀
But dumbledore never expected Harry or Voldemort to have the elder wand though yeah? So how does that fit into it?
@@kb4903 Dumbledore knew voldy was gonna try to get his hands on the wand, that's why he asked Snape to kill him so voldy thought Snape was the master of the Elder wand when it rly was Draco
@@joaocabo07 But he didnt expect Draco to disarm him did he? I thought it says something along those lines in the book. Please correct me if im wrong. You think he planned for Draco to be the unaware master? Harry being master was never part of it?
what even snape didn't realize is that dumbledore wasn't raising harry to be sacrificed like a pig when the time came. dumbledore knew if harry fell no one would be able to hold back voldy.
that's why when the order of the Pheonix was fighting between themselves, they knew the best bet was to trust dumbledore.
dumbledore understood everyone on a level they themselves didn't. convincing horace to come to hogwarts without which the horcrux thing wudn't have been understood. he also understood at some point snape wud be asked to make an unbreakable vow or similar thing by the death eaters to test his loyalty.
maybe dumbledore really was death in the deathly hallows story. people die for what they live for.
@@kb4903 I think he knew Draco or somebody else was going to be pushed into killing Dumbledore, that's why he asked Snape to do it instead
Remember, in The Goblet of Fire when Harry told that his blood was taken for Voldemort's rebirth, "Harry thought he saw a gleam of something like triumph in Dumbledore's eyes".
Wtf thats truue
But soon he realised that he was imagining it
@@Sandrarosier7 no he thought he imagined it that was Dumbledore realizing that Harry could survive
@@bravo48 alright..l'm not so good in English.. may be that's why l thought like that..but thanks for correcting me..
Wow!
Harry didn't die because he just said no. Voldemort legally cannot kill Harry without his consent.
Favo_u_rite no, he accepted death
@@anilithl He had his fingers crossed behind his back tho
Voldemort waited for 15 mins to kill Harry so technically Harry could leave death behind
Favo_u_rite I’m dead
@cas web r/woooosh
I think the fact that the Elder Wand was loyal to Harry and not Tom also played some part in him survivivg the killing curse. It could still be the case of that the horcrux took the hit because the elder wand could not kill its master.
lol
wrong. a regular wand would not be able to kill its master as the power within the wand that fuels the casting of the spell comes from the master. If the master is dying, the wand will loose the magic with which to cast the spell. the only exception is the elder wand which was built without this flaw bc it was built by death himself and had this shifting loyalty.
Lose***
Also, the master wand cannot kill its master, that's in the lore. A regular wand killing its master isn't even talked about.
No it doesn’t really matter, if we follow the logic of the horcruxes and the feelings and how they affect people’s soul’s(lily protecting Harry with love etc) then I think it’s because there was another soul that needed to get destroyed first, thus leading to harry’s life getting speared. I don’t think it would’ve made a difference
I kinda love the Idea, that if Voldi would have used any other wand, Harry would be dead. But in the pursuit of ever greater power, he used the one wand, that was not able to kill Harry.
Let’s acknowledge dumbledore here in Harry’s success, who ultimately was smart enough to realise Harry was a horcrux before even Voldemort did
Voldemort was maybe powerful but not wise. Dumbledore was as well wise as powerful.
@@cvnsz Voldemort was very smart but this old magic always alluded him like with lily's protection he just couldn't understand it, he was so egotistical that he would look over little details like that because he thought he was better than that he thought he was invincible because of his power and he thought he was so smart that he had covered all his bases and never thought anyone else was smart enough to uncover them I mean he was so cocky that he thought he was the first and only person to find the room of requirement thinking he alone knew Hogwarts better than anyone he was definitely smart probably not very wise like you said but it was mostly his ego that got in his way he was never as careful or as thought out and planning like Dumbledore because he didn't think he needed to be he was blinded by ego and thought his power and knowledge would always win without fail even after it had failed miserably the night he tried to kill harry but he considered this a mistake that would never happen again but the second and last time it failed was again when he tried to kill harry again letting his ego blind him
@@johnhostetler2167 “That which Voldemort does not value, he takes no trouble to comprehend. Of house-elves and children's tales, of love, loyalty, and innocence, Voldemort knows and understands nothing. Nothing. That they all have a power beyond his own, a power beyond the reach of any magic, is a truth he has never grasped.”
@@DetectiveHarry very well said
Mindblown🤯
So your telling me tht if Fred was there for a few more hours Harry’s love could’ve saved him
I always thought it was cheesy to do this buuttttt.....thanks for the thousand likes ❤️❤️ I like to dedicate this to Fred😔
no if harry died earlier
😭
Yes...🥺
yeah ig..
Yes ;(
Anyone who has read the books probably knows this. The confusion is among the people who have only seen the movies.
Shashvat Bhola omg I soooo agree, it explains it so well in the book
Manushi Singh yeh same
I'm to poor to buy harry potter's book
Soooo true!
Yeah you’re right
I would call the place where Harry and Dumbledore had their palaver "limbo" rather than heaven, especially because Voldemort was there, too (at least in the book). If Harry had decided to go on the train that went "on" he would have gone to heaven probably
Yes, I thought the same of this part of the book
I think that's Harry's perception of how he would go to heaven or stay back in the living world as a ghost, because Dumbledore said- "It is, as we say, your party" implying that it is Harry's imagination of how he would go to heaven- by taking a train. This imagination can also be a reference to the fact that Harry took the Hogwarts Express to go to Hogwarts, which felt to him like a heaven when compared to living with the Dursleys
Voldemort: Harry Potter is dead!
Harry: *uno reverse card*
Ehehe
You know, I kinda wish somehow Voldy found out about how the love protection spell continued. It would’ve been so satisfying seeing Voldy find out his brilliant plan to come back backfired in the ultimate way
Call an ambulance call an ambulance
So in conclusion Harry's mother is the one who actually defeat The Dark Lord through her sacrifice 😭😭😭
Her act of sacrifice n love protected harry all these years along with The infamous Elder Wand. Sadly for voldemort, even if he used Lucius's wand,he still would hv died.
Yep wish she lived
R.I.P
Lily Potter
Was loved by many wizards
R.I.P
Voldemort
Was loved by nobody everyone hated him except bellatrix
@cha cha thanks
@@herbthedino5637
Fuck James. He was a bully. Good riddens.
@@Amor_fati.Memento_Mori ok
Ginny Weasley ,the girl who threw Lord Voldemort's soul in the toilet
😂😂😂
Ummmm... You are right.
😂😂😂😂
confused can you explain what you mean lol??
She means the tom riddle book @@DigitalFl0w
NEVILLE SAID " HARRY DIDN'T DIE IN VAIN. HIS HEART BEAT FOR US. FOR ALL OF US "
AND HE WAS BRAVE AS HIS PARENTS SO PULLED OUT THE SWORD OF GODRIC GRYPHINDOR
when I heard "he gave his allies the same protection his mother did" I finally understood how ginny blocked the killing curse
If you mean the one Bellatrix cast just before Molly said the greatest line in the entire series and then went on to prove that no one lives when mama bear goes into kill mode no Bellatrix’s aim just sucked she missed.
@@billysmith5409 lol
Poor Fred 😂
@@billysmith5409 LMFAO best comment ever
If this were true … why did Fred die ??
I always thought that Harry didn’t die because he was the master of the Elder Wand at the time. In the book, it says “the Elder Wand must always win duels for its owner.” So I thought that when Voldemort killed Harry with the Elder Wand, the wand chose not to kill Harry because it cant’t kill its owner
That's what I thought
Dungus Glumbus I think in this channel's video about the Deathly Hallows, just as you've said, "the Elder Wand must always win DUELS for its owner," so the wand didn't kill its master when they DUELED after the scene at the forest. When Harry was in the forest, however, it wasn't a duel. He went there without an intent of wielding his wand at hand, but to willingly give up his life. Therefore, it wasn't technically a "duel".
Even after that he still couldn't defeat Harry in a fight the theory in this video is half bake the elder wand will never allow to kill it's master even Harry say that in the end that the wand is dening voldy to use spell on his master
its not a theory it is a fact clearly stated in the book
Its actually better theory
Voldemort : Avada K...
Hermione: its no avada its AvaDAAA
Oh no not this mud blood
...Or you take pride in being an insufferable know-it-all.
O I know this meme
@@loky3037 please don't tell her mud -blood
Could you imagine fucking up the killing curse that won’t end well for you
There's also the most powerful, ultimate spell that protects Harry everytime: *Plotticus Armorus!*
I’m sticking with this explanation
😂😂😂😂 FACTS !!
And what’s wrong with plot armour? There wouldn’t be a story without it!
This isn’t plot armour because there was a reason all along and it’s part of the plot.if there was no explanation they wouldn’t have added that part
@@ulfberht4431 Tis why it is the most powerful ultimate spell
Harry didn’t die because he had a huge uno reverse card in his shirt.
That’s really fucking halarious, and creative!
Lol
600th like
Lolo
Plenty enough reason for me to not worry about it anymore. 😊👍
I feel like this was pretty clear in the book but the movies don’t say anything specific that would have led me to know about the protection
Exactly. There are a lot of things that are brought up in the books (why Neville isn't the cosen one i.e.) that confuse the movie audience
But honestly the canon explanation makes less sense then the fan theories.
@@FMeister94 a lot of the fan theories are so well thought out and put together I can totally agree. If jk Rowling watches any of the theory videos I’m sure she sees missed opportunities
It’s clearly explained in the movie, the elder wand will not kill its owner, Harry is the owner of the wand at the time.
@@thekingsig2153 that’s not the main reason tho
He had the most powerful bit of magic to ever exist on his side... Plot Armor
Of course!
How is this plot armor? Plot armor is something that exists out of no where and just to save the main character, this isnt plot armor you doughnut, it was clearly thought and not plot armor. You could argue that "Omg the protection itself is plot armor" No! It was an excellent play on toms part that allowed him to touch harry but turned out to be his downfall
So plot armor
@@aaacaaaaaab i like your answer. I've read the books 5-10 times. And the last year I've been listening to them. Think I've listen like 16 times now. And you're absolutely correct, this was though through 👍
@@TheReaperOf ty
Harry doing what his mother did and creating a love shield for the ENTIRE WIZARDING WORLD is not only a fantastic full-circle moment, but Harry’s best moment. It’s so overlooked 😭
The reason he didn’t die was because Voldemort didn’t say the curse correctly! He said,
“VANILLA BANANAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!”
Edit: Is my most liked comment on TH-cam really about Voldemort craving pie.
Black gryphon?
LunaTheLightFury :P Stop, stop, stop. You’re going to pop someone’s eye out. Besides, you’re saying it wrong
Lol
🤣🤣😂
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
"Why didn't Harry die?"
Because he's the main character.
I’m the main character
No bc idc and idk oh wait I do care these r the only movies I will watch from here on out
Tell that to Maximus in Gladiator 🤣
@@fei8151 the cowboy bebop name drop bruh fuuuuuu
This is the best explanation of all.
"You ve been raising him like a pig for slaughter."
-Severus Snape
Dumbledore knew all along.
@@ianpaulogonzaga4308 Dumbledore expected it but don't know! Most of the times what Dumbledore expected is the truth.
Severus thought so, but Albus had other plans...!
Like Jesus
@@hanantkm true
So, when Lily sacrificed herself for Harry, she inadvertently placed the equivalent of a protection charm on him. But this charm had several caveats: The protection would only work so long as he was under the care of someone who shared Lily's blood, which is why he was made to live with Petunia. In addition, the protection would only last until Harry's sixteenth birthday. Not the sixteenth anniversary of Lily's sacrifice, but the actual day Harry turned 16. Later, Voldemort was reborn with Harry's blood, and therefore Lily's, inside of him. This somehow extended Lily's protection past his sixteenth birthday, and freed up the requirement for Harry to be under the care of the individual carrying Lily's blood. So, from Voldemort's reincarnation during Goblet of Fire until his defeat in Deathly Hallows, Harry was effectively immune from death and there were no stakes.
For a less convoluted explanation, consider: Harry was, at this point, the master of the elder wand. When Voldemort struck him with the killing curse, it refused to kill its master and instead killed the part of Voldemort that lived inside of him. Same as in their final duel.
The wand can't just decide to kill the horcrux instead of Harry. Harry is the horcrux
17th birthday not 16th
@@lukasd6546 It could ... becuase it's fiction ....
@@AbdallaAmeri No, it's based on Harry Potter lore
@@lukasd6546 exactly, not every single minute detail is provided of the world. Hence the extent of some explanations and possibilities could go beyond your comprehension since it's a wizarding world. You talk as if you live in there knowing it's scientific and magical limits lol.
Voldemort: AVADA KADARV-
Hermione: no No NO! You’re gonna take someone’s eyes out. Besides, your saying it wrong.
Voldemort: 😶
Grace Elliott with No nose
Loooooooooooooooooooooooooooooool I couldn't stop laughing
"Voldmort's laugh at harry's death"
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
I cant stop laughing😆😆
He wasn't in heaven. It was more like limbo. He had a train to go back or a train to go on to heaven.
stairway to heaven
I see what you did there
Thank you!
No. ... Sorry but just no
@@ricybaby no? How is that 'No?' 🙄 he had a choice. I've read the books/ seen the films enough times to understand it.
Voldemort could literally tell one of the death eaters to stab a knife into Harry but he was stupid....
he wanted to be the one to kill him tho. too ignorant
He could of literally paid the milkman to drop three tonnes of full fat milk on him
Bro.. what about the prophecy then..
Nothing would have killed harry because of the prophecy so he wasn't stupid just a bit smarter than you
@Bhavya Dabur I agree the real stupid one here id Jheel Doshi
Harry becoming the master of death at the forest makes the most sense to me as to why he didn’t die. Moreover, that’s what the book is focused on.
me too, because at that point he owns the cloak of invisibility, the resurrection stone and without realising it, the elder wand. and after he comes back to life he explains to voldemort that the wand isn’t truly his while they’re fighting, so harry probably realised himself that he had became the master of death.
It doesn't matter what you think. The explanation in the book is canon. Period.
@@MrCetyque It may be canon, but what I think makes more sense. Period.
@@ricedonut6567 It doesn't - The whole thing with Harry's blood was foreshadowed at the end of the 4th Book. Love is and has been a concept throughout all seven of books, rather than a stupid concept that was introduced in the last book.
@@kanavwastaken The foreshadowing in the Goblet of Fire doesn't justify how it saved Harry from death. The blood used to resurrect Voldemort are of Harry's, the very same one with Lily's protection. If memory serves, it's effectiveness should of worn off the moment Harry came of age. As Harry's protection is gone, so should the one on Voldemort's veins. The Deathly Hallows has, and still makes more sense.
The Wand to inflict death
The Stone to reverse death
The Cloak to evade death
Together, they make one the master of death.
And there's a reason why this fan theory was widely accepted by many despite it not being canon and debunked by Rowling herself.
As you said, love had been the concurrent concept all throughout the books that I don't deem it necessary to reinforce it with the seventh book's title.
Other than that, when it comes to the idea of love in the HP franchise, many people were too focused on Lily and Snape that they tend to forget to grasp the bigger picture, and that Harry, Dumbledore, and many other characters are able to express their love as well. The Deathly Hallows book still portrayed love through Harry's sacrifice in the hopes of not only protecting everyone, but also to destroy the Horcrux, all were from an act of love.
It is also symbolic in a way, Harry mastering the Deathly Hallows kinda projects how love triumphs over death, or above all else in general, even magic.
Voldemort: avada keda-
Harry: I LoVe YoU VoLdY
I laughed so hard 😂
Ben Hobman LOL
after all these year....
you love me? :'(
Wayde the Flying Jedi 😆
Voldy more like *baldy*
R.i.p Alan Sidney Patrick Rickman
21.2.1946 - 14.1.2016🙏💚💚
Who's that?
Electronic Corgi He is the one who played Severus Snape
@@angelicagabrielle4341 Ahhhhh ok.
He died ob my bday..
Electronic Corgi HOW DARE YOU
So the reason why no one else died fighting once Harry came back is because he put the same protection on everyone that his mother gave him wow I never knew that thank you for making this video!
Bev Johnson but if only Fred lived
Right it's something I think I knew but never really thought about. I fucking love Harry Potter
Everything he said in the video was well explained in the books. I'm assuming this video is for those who didnt read them?
@@Gatman__92 is it explicitly stated or just hinted at? It's been about a year since my last time through the books I dont remember it being said
@@l1m0b0at3 yes its explicitly said in the last chapter
"protection by love with the power of family"
- Dominic Potter
I still wanna know why he didn’t see Hedwig, Mad-Eye, Tonks, or Fred Weasley when he used the stone
Yeah I like this comment, but I wanted Dumbledore or Snape to appear too.
Well I think that's because Harry wanted to see people for whom he used to feel protected. That he'd be protected from all the harm. He knew he'd die, so he remembered the people who protected him from dying before. His parents, his godfather, his teacher.
Chandrayee Dey My dude, do you live in america? It’s 2:02AM.
😑
@@chandrayeedey7462 you know that mad-eye, tonks and fred died also because they protected harry
Ron almost killed Harry in one of the movies in the flying car and yet Voldemort can't lay a finger on him =_=
AND THE BOOK!
GRT Plumbing hell, a troll almost killed Harry!
Dobby was more successful at hurting harry than Voldemort ever was
Fucking gingers bro...
Just because of the love protection you idiots cant u understand
Why use Avada kadevra knowing that it failed once voldy could've used sectum sempra by which he can watch harry die slowly and enjoy it
Voldemort is arrogant and wanted to prove he could do it.
he wouldn’t have known the sectumsempra spell, i mean it was snape’s
voldemort wanted to kill harry as fast as possible.
I think he couldnt hurt him at that point either way, but ive also wondered, if he couldnt like destroy trees and make debree fly towards harry impaling him or something, instead of using avada kedavra, i wondered if it would dodge the loving spell aura Harry had. But i doubt it. Just the actions of Voldemort himself, i feel, couldnt even hurt Harry at that point. Not only he had his mother's spell, but he doubled it by sacrificing himself in the forest and Elder Wand, which Voldemort used, was probably very hesitant, while conjuring spells against its own master - Harry.
Maybe he could've just killed him like a Muggle😑 Take a gun, find Harry and ShOoT!!!
I’m writing this before you explain it, my idea which I’ve heard somewhere it that: in Goblet of Fire, when Voldemort took Harry’s blood, he got Lily’s protection inside his blood now. So when Voldy tried to kill Harry in the forest, both the horcrux and Harry died. However, given Voldy was still alive, so was Lily’s protection. So Harry survived, but the horcrux remained dead
eyyyy.
This makes more sence
So Harry did die? At least of a little bit or a second? Because how would he get the part of Voldemort out of him if he didn’t?
Harry did not die 'cause he is tHe BOy *WHO LIVeD*
The boy *WHO LIVED* can not die
Lol
*LIVED* (think about it)
Lived is past tense
G Roxyana Because the boy *WHO LIVED* is already dead
@@torchtorquedreams4348 :)))
Voldemort: I CAN TOUCH U NOWWWWW
Everyone: wOOOOOwww Voldemort
creep
lol he is also like a simp
Actually, Harry had much more powerful magic on his side:
Plot Armor
He had god and anime
no he had uno revers card did you not already know that @DovahRS
Harry Potter and the deus ex machina.
@@truerealrationalist Is not really a deus ex machina since it was all thought out from the very beginning, and it all has an explanation
@@clicktilldie7774
That's true, but when the explanations are given _after_ events...it's still deus ex machina. By way of contrast, the whole "wand chooses the wizard" is established in the first book and becomes a vital plot point in books 6 and 7.
I think the bigger question is, why didnt Voldemort actually check to see if Harry was indeed dead? Like just shoot another AK at him just to make sure. Would have been game over.
He was afraid of Harry and didn't even want to come near him or check himself
He believed people trusted him
he was fainting after struck that killing curse on Harry, it was really strange and he doesn't understand what just happened, and after that he was scared for his life, afraid to touch Harry thinking that it would be endangered his life, even his death eaters that surrounded him was shocked and no one was brave enough when Voldemort ask them to check if Harry is really dead, Narcissca was force by Voldemort to check Harry because he despised the Malfoy family after they failed so many task, and it finally played for Harry advantage because Narcissca straightly lied to Voldemort just so she could go to the castle and take draco away.
AK has a cooldown period of course
Harry Potter: Because he is so weak, he couldn't even kill me as a baby!
J.K Rowling: No, because I wrote so.
Lol 🤣😆
Lmao
Lol
Voldemort: IWAANA BANANA
Hermione: stop stop, u are going to take someone’s eye out 👁
Hermione: It's avadaaaa not I wanna
Voldemort: Fine do it if your so smart
Hermione: Avadaaaa Kevadvra
*credits rolling*
That’s what it sounds like!🥺
IWANNA BANANA?! 😂😂😂😂 WTH
Voldy: Avada kedavra!
Harry: NO U
Voldy: *disintegrates*
Voldy used Avada not Avda but this was the first mistake
The second mistake was he sounded Vanila Bananaaaa so harry was sent into a sweet dream with Dumbledore..😁
I’m rubber and you’re glue whatever you say bounces off me and sticks to you.
Neener-neener-neeeeeener!
Deylan Acasio - It can’t glue to me, I made of rubber, or did you forget?
Deylan Acasio - Yes, I suppose it is, but it’s also a phrase that’s been in existence since the late 1940’s, at least.
This was literally explained in the book. How are people still questioning it...?
Non-readers, I give a pass, because the movie didn't explain anything, but how can readers still be confused...?
Chould you do a video about the unforgivable curses or hogwarts subjekts
Yes
Yassss great idea
YASS QUEEN!!!
Yeah, you should do more videos on Hogwarts, the teachers, and the subjects.
YODA SKYWALKER No! He can't do a vid on Hogwarts subjekts only subjects!👍😜😊😆
He didn’t die because of Hedwig’s protection.
You know it’s true.
In the book Hedwig didn't even protect him. She died locked in her cage. Then Harry blew her up lol.
@@ekajkroy5456 lol really?
@@kingbaldwiniv1372 really lol
Beth, you have no idea how Sacrificial Protection charm works.
@@youdontneedtoknowwhoiam6640 I suggest you read it again. She gets hit by a killing curse while in the cage, dies, and when the sidecar falls, Harry blows it up. I literally just looked it up again to make sure. "Harry spat blood out of his mouth, pointed his wand at the falling sidecar, and yelled, “Confringo!” He knew a dreadful, gut-wrenching pang for Hedwig as it exploded"
Interesting how part of Voldemort lives within Harry that keeps him alive while part of Harry lived within Voldemort that kept Harry alive
This is my favorite part of goblet of fire. When Harry returns to Hogwarts and tells dumbledore what happened, there’s a fleeting moment where dumbledore has triumph in his eyes, because he knows after Tom took Harry’s blood, he sealed his fate, as long as they destroyed all of his horcruxes. Brilliant little bit she added in that book, it all fits together so well.
Honestly Hermione is the reason he’s alive. He’d died a LONG time ago without her
Honestly if the school din't pick Hermonie Harry and Ron would met someone else :)
@@abcabckabc or not....probably not because Hermione is very smart....
Rewa Anam snape’s obstacle in philosophers stone. if he just did it clueless he would’ve died.
Exactly!
@Harry Potter everyone knows that you are not harry so stop saying "I"
Who would win: Voldemort, someone who worked years to be feared, to achieve what he wanted to do, killed many people, was a complete terror that almost no one could stop, or THe POweR oF loVE
The power of love.
A force from above.
Purge the soul.
Make love, Youuuurrr goooaaaal.
There is no such thing as “love”. It’s an abstract. A feeling. The only “love” which exists is a mother’s love for her children. That’s it.
That sounds straight out of Disney 💀
@@chandanss4918 headass
The power of Sacrifice**, every time there's a magic concept in a story there will be powerful spells linked to sacrifice .
Do his friends realise that Harry put a protection on them?
And did Lilly potter ever realise that she saved Harry’s life?
I also would like to know this
Well she was a bit dead, so no.
Im guessing when your a witch or wizard you can perform magic without even realising it, lily knew what was going to happen, she knew that she wasn't going to stand aside, im guessing love is the reason Harry was protected and lily probably didn't know it would actually work
Depends on how you see interaction with those who've gone before us. Lilly (and James et al) can't be brought back to life, but it doesn't mean they can't share awareness if Divine permission is granted to them. IMO the vision of Erised was no more than wishful thinking on Harry's part but the dead did seem to consciously interact with Harry both in the cemetery and in the forest; also Harry interacted with the spirit of Dumbledore after his own "death." I can't recall where Dumbledore said the death was another adventure (I know Gandalf did, lol) but to answer your second question, I'm sure she did. As Jesus said, paraphrasing, blessed is he who gives his life for another.
Idk about lily but harry had announced in the book that he accidentally put a protection on his allies by willingly dying.
Man, 2019 feels like yesterday. Amazing to think that 5 years have already gone by. Used to watch your videos back then, maybe i'll check out some of your new content.
Is it just me or 3:40 was just so cute
Dumbledore said to Harry that there’s a mark on him and Harry reaches his hand to the mark on his forehead and Dumbledores like no no 🥺
Ikr!!
Ikr 🥺🥺
Harry was the owner of the elder wand. A wand can’t kill its master. I thought this was explained?
noooooo. Lily’s protection was in harry’s blood. Harry’s blood was used to make voldy come back. Lily’s protection was in both body’s. Harry was accidentally a Horcrux. Voldy didn’t know. Harry understood he had to be killed by voldy to kill him too. Voldy said AvAdA kEdAvRa and Harry “died”. He woke up in some sort of weird world where Dumb was and they talked and harry understood. Because lily’s protection in voldy’s body it was also still in harry’s body so as long as voldy lived harry would live to. But otherwise (as long as harry lived voldy would live too) can’t be anymore because voldy destroyed the horcrux by AvAdA kEdAvRa’ing Harry so Harry would win. Tadaaaaaaa
@@menthesimon well...he literally didn't die because elder wand couldn't kill it's master. It is literally explained in the books. End of story.
Yeah ok maybe but it was mostly the other reason
I mean why would that whole story that Dumb with Harry was when harry was like “dead” but actually not “dead”
It was limbo. Harry could choose whether he wanted to die or go on. He decided to go on, but didn't take the part of voldemort with him and simply left it behind, dead.
‘It was the love protection inside of voldemort.’ No, no... Love and Voldemort in one sentence? That doesn’t sound right
No or not should be somewhere between them
That is just stupid
Love D’Mort… Ima head out
“Lily’s love protected Harry from Voldemort”
Doesn’t seen too far fetched.
I always thought it was because, as the Elder Wand was loyal to Harry, it wouldn't have killed its rightful master, but instead only the part within Harry that wasn't Harry (the piece of Voldemort's soul).
This is clearly the reason.... No matter what kind of "flying documented theories" i read here and there on the internet
Yeah that's it. Remember even Harry's sister wand could only wound and not fatally harm him because they both had a feather from the same phoenix. The dursley home wasn't even his home anymore when this happens. I think it's as simple as you say, people love to complicate things.
This makes the most sense
I loved the "Master of Death" theory more because that makes sense clearly.
yes, for me too. But it would not explain why would horcrux in harry die, when harry was saved by deathly hallows
and it's not a theory, it's a metaphor
@@jozefhrin2034 bcoz the horcrux is a part of Voldemort's... not Harry Potter's... btw... the horcrux should die bcoz JKR must end the story... 😂😂😂 otherwise Harry Potter movies will go like teledramas😜
this whole comment just shows how The Movie did not explain the Dumbledore's explanation correcty while in the King Cross Station, and how people who didnt read the books fret more than those who read
@@Lucky-gu8ry exactly. The movies frustrated me cos am hp books reader n they just screwed up characters n twisted lot of things. I had read all the parts like tons of times n the only parts worth mentioning are the first 3 movies
MovieFlame: Why didn't Harry die in the Forest?
Me: Because he is the boy who lived.
Not died!
Voldemort: "why can't this boi die"
Dom: "well..."
Voldemort: "don't say it"
Dom: "... Because..."
Voldemort: "..."
Dom: "because family."
Voldemort: "listen here you little sh..!"
LOL
Voldermort : Avara kadaaaara 😂
and the power of friendship and love
@@josephnkanta920 Love and Family will never dies. For family (Dom evade Voldermort spell)
This comment is amazing
Wait… Maybe I’m missing something. If Harry’s protection should have ended when he was 17, shouldn’t all traces of his mother’s blood have stopped protecting him, including Voldemort’s blood? If not, and if Lily’s blood running through Voldemort’s veins was enough to protect Harry, why wouldn’t the very existence of Petunia be enough to keep Harry safe? Also, since it was technically Harry’s blood that was used when Voldemort gained his new body in GOF, shouldn’t the blood running through Harry’s own veins have kept him safe?
Yes, which is why this video is nonsense.
Harry's love protection didn't end at 17, however his protection at Privet Drive 4 ended when he turned 17. Meaning that Lily's protection was still a part of Harry and then a part of Voldemort when he used Harry's blood (Which is why he could touch Harry but also ironically why he could never kill Harry)
@@nizunia864 or maybe since the part of harry;s blood that entered voldmort was when Harry was 14, maybe the blood remained 14 inside Voldmort
The protection ending when Harry turned 17 wasn't due to an "expiration date" on Lily's blood magic. It stayed in effect as long as Petunia was his guardian, which she ceased to be the moment he became an adult in the wizarding world.
When Harry gave himself over in the Forbidden Forest, he put his life in Voldemort's hands, thus making someone with Lily's blood responsible for him again. If Voldemort had used the killing curse without Harry making that choice, Harry would've died.
@@damned0wl That's sort of a rubbish explanation. Harry himself has Lily's blood so by the same logic he'd be fine regardless. At this point you'd literally be making shit up to try make your idea work.
Me: **Reads “Why Harry didn’t die.”**
Also Me: Because he didn’t.
DenizIsDenice same !
Marko Brnad
Tris in Divergence died even though she was the main character.
@@UnfamiliarIntimacy that is my favourite book series / movie
It's. Genius.
@Marko Brnad whooosh
Theories that make way more sense than what is cannon.
1. Harry is the true owner of all the deathly Hallows making him the master of death
2. The elder wand would not kill it's own master and so didn't kill harry but the part of harry that was Voldemort
3. Harry used the resurrection stone on himself before being killed.
I don't like what Rawling says is cannon because it makes the whole "we need the blood of harry so Voldemort can actually deal with him" completely redundant. If Dumbledore knew all of this why did we have to scheme and hide and so many people have to die? Why not send 14 year old harry to kill Voldemort? Voldemort can't defeat harry EVER due to sharing blood. It just makes the whole war pointless when this could have been taken care of as soon as it started. Harry had no reason to fear.
Wow that's actually a really good point!!!
This whole love spell thing is the weakest part of the saga to be honest. It makes no sense and is not consistent with anything.
it's possibility that the fact Harry will not die because Voldemort had his blood was a guess Dumbledor himself told Harry after Harry was hit by killing curse that most things he did was a guess work so he couldn't just take the risk Voldemort could touch him now and dumbledor was t sure of Voldemort created horvroxes It was revealed he guessed when Harry told him that Tom riddle appeared out of diary but not sure and of he did then howsmy That is why he forced Harry to get memory from Slughorm He destroyed ring but again the only reason could be that he was guessing it's horcrox So if he wasn't sure about horcrox and blood protector why risk Harry's life since Voldemort could touch him now
why should he sent a 14 yo harry fight with voldemort?the fact that he can't kill him doesn't mean that a deatheater can't
Because Voldemort cant just fucking killed by Harry so easily. There are 7 hocruxes cant u see
Because i spelt " abra ca dabra" instead of " avada ke dabra" be happy now
Not Avada Ke Dabra
Avada Kedavra
Dev Kukreja literally they sound the same
AsYou Say Dark Lord
I'm happy now......
@@knitlerus thus providing the point further.
He's just terrible at spelling. 🤷🏾♂️
So is there any explanation as to why Lily's sacrificial protection, which is supposed to run out when he becomes an adult (17 in the WW), randomly just doesn't after Voldemort takes some blood? Should it not have just expired anyway?
I've been scrolling through the comments and was looking for the same explaination :( pls some one answer :(((
@@schwubdiwuub As I understand it, Lily's protection itself didn't expire. Even Dumbledore says in the Philosopher's Stone that, "love as powerful as your mother's for you, even though the person who loved us is gone, will give us some protection forever." You're forgetting, however, that Dumbledore also invoked a magic that I guess piggybacked off of Lily's sacrifice, meaning that even Voldemort couldn't touch Harry while he was wherever Petunia was. That's the part that was supposed to expire when Harry turned seventeen. Even Voldemort mentions in Goblet of Fire that "Dumbledore invoked an ancient magic to insure the boy's protection as long as he is in his relations' care."
The protection ending when Harry turned 17 wasn't due to an "expiration date" on Lily's blood magic. It stayed in effect as long as Petunia was his guardian, which she ceased to be the moment he became an adult in the wizarding world.
When Harry gave himself over in the Forbidden Forest, he put his life in Voldemort's hands, thus making someone with Lily's blood responsible for him again. If Voldemort had used the killing curse without Harry making that choice, Harry would've died.
@@damned0wlthank you!! An explanation that actually makes sense
"When harry died, his sacrifice gave his allies the same protection"
those some mlg moves right their
Voldemort; "Kills harry"
Harry comes back to life now his allies have the protection aswell
Voldemort;"...shit"
@I Am Who I Am serious (can’t spell his name), Dumbledore,lily and James potter, lupin, tonks and Fred are all dead,their not main characters but the point is that there were all heroes that died but not the main ones (but if you are talking about main ones,yes you are right
@@So_Indecisive the Allies of Harry you mentioned died before the Forbidden Forest encounter though
So basically when Harry came back, everyone at Hogwarts was invincible. Lol.
I know right? What a dumb theory
@@sirgalahad1376 Yeah this stuff is explained in the book, Harry asks Voldemort if he noticed that all of his spells have been bouncing of everyone in their little argument before Harry kills him.
@@brendanthomas2543 Well... Ain't that from Harry trolling him, by placing protection shields between them and Voldemord, giving the illution?
@@mr.boomguy no
Actually it's true and there is line in the book that literally says that. And it actually makes sense
I’m still a little confused- how was Voldemort able to touch Harry Potter if the protection spell lived in Voldemort? The spell was strong enough to save Harry from death but not by Voldemort’s touch?
Because they share the same blood?
If Harry has the protection spell within in his blood, which is now in Voldemort, wouldn’t he still be protected?
Yeah that doesnt seem to explain anything
I think that it's because they share the same blood so protection is on Voldemort too
@@katarinateofanov the protection isnt in voldemort because lily died for harry, not voldemort
Consider my mind blown! I really hung on to the theory that death was pulling the strings as he was affronted by Voldemort's use of horcruxs to escape him, and that's why Harry was able to return from death. I think this explanation works really well too though and you made a really convincing argument for it.
Ooo I like your theory a lot! That would've been cool if at the end we find out it was death all along trying to get his hallows back.
Voldemort: “I can touch you now” Harry: wait.....what?!?! ExCuSe mE
"Wait, Voldy, mY cOnSEnT mAtTeRs"
Lol
tomarry fanfiction intensifies*
sounds a bit gay
🤣
Harry: *I never die, but when I do-i don't*
*This an unoriginal meme btw* 😂
why does this have no replies
Alejandro Alba There’s nothing to reply lol
Basically this is my version:
Harry potter didn't die because he is harry potter.
The end. You're welcome. Good day, good night.
for me it is that he didn't die because a wand can't kill it's master
@@anikamachwe4626
Yeah I know but it's a joke :)
@@3mm3tt_ i know
@@anikamachwe4626 :)
Simplest explanation ever...👏👏👏
Good job
so basically harry was competently invincible whilst Voldemort was alive, even if Voldemort had beaten harry again in the last dual harry would've just gotten up and come back again... right
Fans : So,we finally figured out the cause why Harry did not die!
MovieFlame: well,yes,but actually - no
But it's still confusing..so.....
“Why Harry didn’t die in the Forbidden Forest”
Because he’s Harry Potter
Lul
Because he's John Wick
@@vojtechvodrazka900 lol
Voldy should've chosen neville longbottom instead
He is the boy who lives
He gets to an adult
AND NEVER DIES!!!!
As fas as I remember , the books (maybe) said that horcrux ix all about ripping apart your soul and storing in it someplace else... And when voldy tries to kill harry when he was a baby , the spell backfires because of the protection , voldy's soul rips apart ( whatever was left of it) and a part went into harry to stick (because whatever living thing it could find. ). And also that love protection theory of this video. that love protection was meant for only harry all along. So that's why when it accidentally was transferred to voldy in his new body, the enchantment lived on, (it didn't have any getting over when the carrier is 17 clause in voldy's case cause well voldy is more than 17.), When enchantment found harry in trouble, it worked because it was meant for him. Hence it let the horcrux die and let harry live.
Maybe that's why harry was an accidental horcrux.
That was a different enchantment which expired it was Dumbledore's idea to make Lily's protection even more powerful
I can't get over you calling voldemort "voldy" - it's too good
I honestly think this is a huge overthinking. He didn’t die because he used the deathly hallow of resurrection. He didn’t use it to revive his family members, he just talked to them symbolically, which is why they’re still dead.
Actually, that’s what many people mistakenly think, but the resurrection stone didn’t have anything to do with it…
J.K.Rowling once explained, how Harry came back to life:
_Again, Voldemort violated deep laws of magic he did not understand, but there is more to it than that._
_Having taken Harry’s blood into himself, Voldemort is keeping alive Lily’s protective power over Harry. So Voldemort himself acts almost like a Horcrux for Harry - except that the power of Lily’s sacrifice is a positive force that not only continues to tether Harry to life, but gives Voldemort himself one last chance (Dumbledore refers to this last hope in chapter 35). Voldemort has unwittingly put a few drops of goodness back inside himself; if he had repented, he could have been healed more deeply than anyone would have supposed. But, of course, he refused to feel remorse._
_Voldemort is also using the Elder Wand - the wand that is really Harry’s. It does not work properly against its true owner; no curse Voldemort casts on Harry functions properly; neither the Cruciatus curse nor the Killing Curse. The Avada Kedavra curse, however, is so powerful that it does hurt Harry, and also succeeds in killing the part of him that is not truly him, in other words, the fragment of Voldemort’s own soul still clinging to his. The curse also disables Harry severely enough that he could have succumbed to death if he had chosen that path (again, Dumbledore says he has a choice whether or not to wake up). But Harry does decide to struggle back to consciousness, capitalises on Lily’s ‘escape route’, and pulls himself back to the realm of the living._
_It is important to state that I always saw these kinds of magic (the very deepest life and death issues) as essentially un-scientific; in other words, there is no “Elder Wand + Lily’s Blood = Assured Survival” formula. What count, ultimately, are Harry and Voldemort’s own choices. They have each been given certain weapons and safeguards, but the power of these objects and past happenings lie in how they are understood, and how they are used or enacted upon. Harry has a deeper and truer understanding of the meaning of the objects and past events, but his greatest powers, those that save him, are free will, courage and moral certainty._
So, you see; the resurrection-stone had in fact nothing to do with it.
He couldn’t actually have anything to do with it either, because Resurrection stone does not actually bring back the dead.
The stone doesn't reverse death, it gives the user a hollow imprint of someone's soul. It seems to be better than a ghost, but far less than a human as these imprints can only be seen by the user.
Also, Harry couldn’t ressurect _himself_ with it, not even as a hollow imprint.
So, you might ask now: „What was the purpose of the resurrection stone, if not to actually resurrect Harry?!“
I am going to try to explain this to you:
In Deathly Hallows Chapter 34, Harry found out through the memories of Severus Snape that he himself was the last Horcrux, so he decided to sacrifice himself. On his way to the forbidden forest, where Voldemort and the deatheaters were, he gets to open the snitch and to use the resurrection stone. He uses it to temporarily „bring back“ shades of his parents, Sirius Black, and Remus Lupin. Their presence was enough to give him the courage to keep going, and they remained with him until he made his way to where Voldemort was.
Besides comforting him when he was terrified and hardening his resolve, their spectral form visible only to him acted as Patronus' to get past the Dementors allied with Voldemort that were inside the forest.
So, the resurrection stone was not pointless, but actually very useful for Harry. Without the resurrection stone he probably couldn’t get to the point when he meets Voldemort in the forest, because he wouldn’t have been comforted and encouraged and he also wouldn’t get past the dementors.
The reason why Dumbledore gave Harry the stone through the snitch is because Dumbledore actually planned Harry’s sacrifice from the beginning on (that’s why people criticize him, for basically seeing Harry as a „pig for slaughter“).
And Dumbledore knew, that Harry would need some help. He knew, that Ron and Hermione would help him, such as the Weasleys, Minerva, and many other of his friends. But they would never encourage him, to sacrifice himself. So Dumbledore gave him the snitch with the resurrection stone in it, as he was sure, that those who already died can encourage and accompany him in this particular moment.
I hope you could understand that🙈
Sorry for the long text…😅
Have a blessed day 🙋♀️☺️
he didn't die because Voldemort cannot touch him without PeRmIsIoN.
He should have asked lily nicely. 😂
Just go and make an unbreakable vow with Harry and his parents that none of them would attempt to kill him.
You know, in exchange of sparing the child?
Do the same with Neville, and bam! Prophecy is false.
sudo touch harry :D
Harry was like StOp DoNt ToUcH mE tHeRe ThIs Is mY nO nO sQuArE
innocentdumpling AAAAAaaAAaAAHHH
That barrier was overcome in the Goblet of Fire when Voldemort returned
I actually really loved it when the books said that the Elder Wand didn't want to kill Harry (because he is the Wand owner) but instead it turned around and killed Voldemort
The wand, as Tom started the killing curse, left his hand, turned in mid air and said "No".
Wand then crept backwards towards it's rightful master and lay comfortably in Harry's hand.
@@timmason7430 YASS THAT ONE. I FEEL SO GOOD READING IT 😭😭✨
So Voldemort ultimately saved the person he wanted to kill for 17 years...
Yes he was that strong
The ultimate karma
The ultimate uno reverse
The ultimate bruh moment
I don't know why I find it so funny 😂😂😂 but it is true.
Thank you! I was rereading the books and after the part where they explained that his protection was lifted once Harry no longer called the Dursleys place home , I needed this explanation to understand how he survived.
6:00 Wait, you say if the protection wasn't in Voldemort blood, Harry would have been killed along with the horcrux. But Voldemort casts the curse with the elder wand, that in this moment of the story is Harry's. So it would never harm his true master. Given that, I always thought that the curse, casted with Harry's wand, couldn't kill him and so it killed the only living thing it found: the horcrux.
Harry aceptó morir, era su decisión, así que la Varita de Saúco lo habria matado igualmente, pero él no habría sido derrotado.
@@Nicolas-xf6qh good explanation
Why was the protection lifted at 17 years old
@@thegamershadowz-marcus8915 cuando Lily murió, Harry quedó protegido de la muerte a manos de Voldemort, pero sólo por una única vez, ya que su madre estaba muerta. Dumbledore extendió esa protección para que funcionara en la casa de los Dursley, al ser simultáneamente el hogar de Harry y el lugar donde se encontraba la sangre más cercana a Lily: Petunia (por eso Harry fue dejado allí y no con cualquier familia mágica que quisiera adoptarlo). Al cumplir 17 y alcanzar, por lo tanto, la mayoría de edad, la casa de los Dursley ya no podía funcionar realmente como hogar de Harry, y la extensión del hechizo protector ya no tenía ningún efecto.
You could say that what saves harry is snape's love for lily, since he asked voldemort to spare her life and that's what created the opportunity for her to sacrifice herself. Voldemort, in a somewhat human gesture to his most important servant, gave her the chance to not die, but she still put's herself in front of harry and that's what makes the whole love spell works. Kinda crazy how intricate this whole shenanigan is.
Snape saved the whole wizarding world!!!
Is this why Dobby wanted him to stay home In the secret chamber because he knew he would be safe there under the spell protection.
No because Dobby overheard Lucius’ plan to reopen the Chamber of Secrets that year and they target mudbloods and half bloods
Dobby was unaware of that magic being active for Harry, only reason why he wanted to keep Harry home was because he knew that was the most likely place he’d be untouched should the chamber be opened being that Harry would be far away from the school.
No, Harry was the protection. Not the other way around