The elder wand's allegiance switched to Harry's when Harry disarmed Draco at Malfoy Manor but you show a clip of them dueling in a Hogwarts restroom. Griphook didn't die at Gringotts during the escape. He was killed by Voldemort when Voldemort summoned everyone that worked at Gringotts to Malfoy Manor after Harry and friends escaped with the cup.
Yup, I still cry at when Snape says "always". Also because Alan rickman was my favourite actor of all time and it still leaves me in pieces knowing that he isn't here any more
For those asking why it needed explanation: I just watched all of these movies for the first time recently, and I've never read the books. It was a lot to take in, so videos like this are helpful.
How amazing would it of been if it showed Harry, Ron and Hermione being teachers at Hogwarts and watching their kids be sorted into houses and applauding them. I really wanted to see that more than just waving them off in the train
Ginny knows what it's like to be effected by voldemort from a young age, she was possessed at 11 and lost most of a year of her life because of him. Everyone else had family members killed or were tortured or both because of him. Ginny also lost family. You've also got in the books that it wasn't a one off thing, I always saw it it as Rowlin wanting to give harry a happy ending but not turn it into a romance book. So all of the relationship happened off screen, it wasn't what was important to the story, that was the whole Voldemort trying to kill him thing.
I am currently 11, and on the 29th of august, where my birthday is, which is VERY soon, i will not be able to get the letter after that!!!!! I only have a few days left!!!!! NOOOOOO Jk ;)
I knoww.. i cringed so hard.. also Griphook didnt die with dragon fire he Voldy killed him..! the "triangular mirror" was not possessed by the elf (his name is Dobby btw) . Harry had it all along. Sirius gifted that mirror to him..
When he said "is this in my head?" It's obvious he was asking about the temporary realm he was in, not the whole damn plot. That's just as idiotic as the walking dead theory in which Rick is dreaming the whole time.
No the wand go back to Dumbledore and " because the last master dies the wand will stop working" so when harry pass on the next person to looking for elder wand it wont work because the allegiance to harry and because he was never disarmed or defeated in a duel the wand wont work for the next master.
I think it would become yours after killing him, no disarming needing (if I can remember the history). Just kill Harry in his sleep, then take the wand. Now it's yours.
Sorry to be one of "those" book fans. but there's just a couple things to clarify: 1. Harry didn't break the wand in the book, he used it to fix his original one, then put it back in Dumbledore's grave 2. When Dumbledore suggests that Harry could "board a train" the meaning was that the train would take him "on" (as in on to the afterlife, or something of the sort), not back to life.
And the Whole mirror thing.. this guy in the video says "the Elf" (the name is Dobby btw) possessed the mirror... Sirius had given him the mirror and kept the pair with him..! When Mundungus Fletcher stole things from the house he stole the mirror too and sold it to Aberforth (whose reflection harry sees not Albus's) who sends Dobby for help..!!.. He should have read the books.. well wait the starting of Deathly hallows part 1 they show harry with that piece of mirror ..!! uhh!! its not a book or movie thing .!! this guy does not know it.. he is a muggle !
Don't be sorry about being a book fan when the books are made into movies. For the most part this series was adapted very well. Deathly Hallows changed and omitted some HUGE things. One was the Elder Wands fate. HATED that! Harry repair your wand! I was also very disappointed in the final battle between Harry and Voldemort. I wanted to see all the Death Eaters get defeated by our characters. Your #2 is the narrator not knowing what he is talking about. They need to get someone who is competent and make sure their info is correct.
Ay_dree_n I was disappointed with the final battle in the movie... how nevil killed nagini, how harry and Voldemort fought in the great hall How harry and repeated what his mother had done with the love curse So many disappointments
greedsongwriter say bruh hold up, Neville needed something other than his speech he's was protrayed as clumsy goofball until the deathly hallows he's the definition of character development
I'm a casual fan, and I don't have the time to read every page of every book. So, this video was helpful in pointing out some details that totally went over my head.
Personally I believe the "of course it's in your head" line was a nod towards the fans. As we read the books they played out in our own minds, we visualised everything, as lots of us consider ourselves not muggles, I think it was a nod to us that while we know it's not real, how much the books/franchise meant to us is real and valid.
Great video. But Griphook wasn't killed by the dragon; he was killed by Voldemort after he realized that the Gringotts vault had been raided, during the slaughter montage in front of the Malfoys.
i knowww i cringed so hard when he said that .. Also the "triangular Mirror" was not possessed by the elf (the name is Dobby btw) ... Sirius had gifted the mirror to him in year four or five.. serious had the pair and they could communicate through that.. when Mundungus Fletcher stole things form the house he stole the mirror too and Aberforth (dumbledore's brother) bought it.. its his reflection harry sees and mistakes for Albus and its him who sends "The Elf" to save them ..!!
I've always thought that when he asks "is this all inside my head" he means is he actually talking to dumbledore and also it has to be real because the first chapter of the first book is from uncle vernons point of view and that proves that it's not just him making things up
There are several episodes in the books (mostly or exclusively at the start of those books) that happen outside Harry's consciousness, including Scrimgeour's and Fudge's meeting with the Mugggle Prime Minister in Book 6 (which also mentions several earlier meetings between the Prime Minister and Fudge) and the Death Eaters' meeting in Book 7.
Harry knew he was still alive. When he asked Dumbledore if it's real or inside his head Dumbledore says it's both. The fact that Harry met a dead person although he wasn't dead means that he never talked to Dumbledore, but to himself. He was actually realizing what happened the time he was in a kinda coma state. Then he woke up but pretended to be dead. So it was all inside his head but that didn't make it unreal
Your explanation is wrong... Harry doesn't become the owner of elder wand by casting the rectusecptrum spell but by stantching his wand in Malfoy Manor in the deathly hallows part I...
People need to READ THE DAMN BOOKS if they can't understand the ending. The movie ending and the book ending are different. The movie doesn't explain the whole story, although it DOES explain how Harry was the master of the Elder wand, if people just take the time to pay attention.
Eric DiMemmo If anyone hasn't yet read the books, START FROM THE BEGINNING READING THEM NOW! If you aren't patient enough to read, listen to the audiobooks! The differences are so many, you will feel like you are on a new Harry Potter adventure!!!
I do agree the books are WAY better but they do literally explain a lot in Deathly Hallows Part 2. We get Snape's backstory and CLEAR allegiance and intentions. Deathly Hallows explained and how Harry is the master of the Elder Wand, Harry is a Horcrux.
"Finally Explained" these are all just plot details that are covered either in the movies or in the books, you didn't go in depth at all. No effort was put into this video
When Harry asked if it was in his head, I don't think he was talking about the entire adventure, from when he first got his letter to then, I think he was talking about his discussion with Dumbledore after he was struck by Avada Kedavra after all he should have been dead. Besides Dumbledore says 'why should that make it any less real.' I don't believe the OH IT WAS ALL A DREAM ending at all. That also just strips the magic off of everything.
The clip you showed of Harry disarming Malfoy was before Dumbledore was killed. He actually gained control of the elder wand when he was captured in Malfor Manor, and he ran over and grabbed Draco’s wand when he was leaving.
Is it bad that every time I watch part 2 I get the same "end of the series feels" as the 1st time I watched... Literally the best movie series of all time
Just want to say that in the books, rather than breaking the wand, Harry fixed is old wand with it, then returned it to Dumbledore's grave, a much better ending than the one presented in the film
Emperor Reign didn’t explain anything. In fact, half of this is wrong lol. Boarding a train meant he was moving on lol. Harry literally says that the elder wand is his, and Harry wasn’t quickly over taken by Voldemort lol
Psyko I don't think Dumbledore predicted that. His focus was getting Voldemort mortal so he can be defeated by anyone really. Harry was the first choice to potentially do so. Harry disarming Draco was all Harry's doing.
You only said the obvious things and the things we already knew. What about the questions: Why did Voldemort turned into ashes? What will happen to the Malfoy family? Will the Cursed Child be a movie too?
Aldrich Luna Question 1: After all the horcrux’s were destroyed Voldemort had 0.75% of his soul left. When they had that last confrontation Voldemort’s killing curse rebounded onto him and the ash part is just for dramatization. Question: 2 because the malfoy’s left Voldemort and he death eaters they were pardon from a sentence to Azkaban, Draco married and had a son Scorpius and he went to Hogwarts Question 3: J.K. Rowling confirmed that the cursed child would not get a movie, but there are four more fantastic beasts movies coming.
So from the books I was under the impression Harry was not killed by Voldemort because he was actually in possession of all 3 deathly hallows. He carried the cloak and stone with him and the wand was not only present but was his as the video says. This made Harry the master over death and thus he went to the king's cross vision as at that point he was now allowed to choose whether he lived or died. The Dumbledore he met there was in fact Death and instead of choosing to die himself he chose to kill the piece of Voldemort instead.
I've always hated Voldemort's death in the movie. Voldemort feared two things above all else: death and not being special. His death in the book left his remains as just one more corpse after the battle. He was dead and he was not special. But in the movie he disintegrates, which not only means there is no body, it means that future generations who might worship Voldemort can imagine that he's still out there somewhere. In an effort to find a unique/cool visual, the movie ruined a large part of what made Voldemort's death so satisfying in the first place.
I have to disagree with your statement about Snape not caring that Harry may have to die in order to defeat the Dark Lord. It was made very clear in the books and in his memories that when he found out how Dumbledore had been "raising him like a pig for slaughter" and to "die at the right moment", it struck a chord for him. Especially since he vowed to protect him for the sake of Lily's memory and to make sure she didn't die in vain. He may have not cared for the sole reason of loving or even liking Harry, but he did care.
Bro although this video is kinda old now, I just wanted to say that I love you for using the Interstellar reference on min 3:02! That poem is such an amazing thing of art and always reminds me of one of the greatest films ever made (besides harry potter ofc).
2 underrated heroes Barty Crouch jr: He used the imperius spell on Harry so Harry knew how to protect him from it Vernon Dursley: Vernon knew that He-Who-Must-Not-Be-Named was going to kill Harry so he wanted to lock him in at Privity Drive so You-know-who won't find him
I wonder what Audiences' reactions would have been like if at the end of The Deathly Hallows part 2 after the screen went black but right before the credits appeared, it played an unreleased deleted scene from the Sorcerer's stone showing Harry waking up in his closet room under the stairs and then walking out to discover that he had been dreaming the entire time, and that none of the events from all 8 films had actually taken place. And we, the audience would come to realize that the filmmakers had been planning this all along, upon seeing an 11 year old Daniel Radcliffe unexpectedly appear onscreen. And we would then realize that Harry's tragic orphan life with his Aunt and Uncle would be all that he'd ever know... and that there was never any magic.
The reason Harry did not die from the killing curse that Harry accepted was because Voldemort has some of Harry’s blood and Lily’s protection thus making it impossible for him to die while Voldemort lived.
Harry DID NOT gain mastery of the Elder Wand during the brief duel with Malfoy in the Hogwarts bathroom. It was when he disarmed him at Malfoy Manor after just prior to Dobby’s rescue and death.
Sadly, this didn't answer the one thing about Deathly Hallows that I never understood. Why exactly does Voldemort die at the end? It's not like Harry cast a killing curse or anything?
EM11212 Yeah, but surely Avada Kadava doesn't disintegrate you? And what the crap did Molly cast on Bellatrix?! It's like the writers didn't want the bad guys to leave corpses or something.
Ya in the books Voldemort doesn't disintegrate he just kinda keels over with a thud. Same with Bellatrix in the books she just kinda falls to the ground dead. Not sure why they changed it in the movies. Maybe to make the deaths look less real, and be more kid friendly??
Otterinmywater There are lots of things which the movies messed up. One of the best scenes in the book was the time when Harry after gaining the elder wand repairs his own broken wand. Then he leaves the elder wand at the professors table. This hints that the elder wand is indestructible. But they just snap it off in the movies. Like no one has ever thought of destroying the most dangerous weapin in the world.
Thanks for the video. I've read all the books and movies of course left plenty out and changed so many things. One thing I'll mention you said in the video is that Griphook died in the fire fight from the dragon when the trio mounted the dragon to escape Gringotts. That's not how he died. He was killed by Lord Voldermort in the Malfoy mansion when he realized another Horcrox had been taken.
Harry not dying because he was a Horcrux is a common misconception, and only a film theory. Harry didn’t die because Voldemort possessed Harry’s blood, which hosted Lily’s protective charm she cast on Harry when she died for him. So long as Voldemort was alive and kept that enchantment active, it anchors Harry to life unless Harry chooses not to live. The part of Voldemort’s soul vanquishing in Harry when he got hit was an added bonus.
The Plothole that always gets me is the Elder Wand. How can Voldemort kill Harry in the woods, if the Elder Wand's master is Harry. You cannot use the wand against its own Master or wielder.
Worst ending in Harry Potter. So many loopholes in the movie that make no sense. 1. How can Voldemort use the elder wand “too hard” to the point that it’s splits? 2. So Harry was able to “kill” Voldemort by Expelliarmus because….. well why? How was he able to do that in the movie?? In the book, JK goes through extensive detail explaining how Voldemort never mastered the elder wand because it belonged to Harry after he disarmed Malfoy who disarmed Dumbledore. The movie never once mentions this. 3. The train station scene in the book was possibly the best dialogue in the whole series. It was filled with emotion, realization, and optimism. There was also lots of detail about why Harry got there after Voldemort “killed” him. In the movie, it’s a 2 minute scene with the worst Dumbledore cast. Honestly, these movies will always have a place in my heart. But Deathly Hallows 2 was seriously disappointing.
You should have gotten people to read the chapter containing the Snape's memory in Book 7. He almost was ready to give up the double agent persona when Dumbeldore suggested this. So he was deeply affected when Dumbeldore suggested Harry needs to die in order to kill Voldemort
There was never any need for explanation. Everyone knew this and if somehow they didn't it's because they didn't pay attention to the movie or didn't watch each movie.
The true ending in the book was that voldemort, in the duel with harry died, and laid there, lifeless. This was the point of the whole story. Tom Riddle died like a human, not a supernatural creature, as he aimed to be.
Daniel it wouldn’t kill the part of Voldemort in him, would it? EVERYONE knows that you can’t just destroy a horcrux with any old thing and killing the part of Voldemort in Harry would just be destroying a horcrux, wouldn’t it? So, unless he actually did kill Harry with the sword of Gryffindor, he wouldn’t be destroying the part of Voldemort in him, right? I think that if Voldemort did kill Harry with a knife or something, Harry would die but the horcrux in him would still be there, unless a horcrux can’t live in a human that isn’t alive.... I could be completely wrong lol
After many years I've come to realize that the true star of the series is Hermione, she is absolutely brilliant. Harry's all courage and charisma, without Hermione he wouldn't have accomplished anything. But paradoxically, it's Harry's charisma that ultimately influences Hermione to follow him.
Personally, I think Dumbledor's words during the train station scene are more of a nod to the phylosophical question of "what is reality". And most definitely those words aren't about the whole adventure, they are only concerning the train station and his (Dumbledor's) presence.
If the elder wand didn't pass to Voldermort since Harry willingly let him kill him, why did the elder wand pass to Draco since he was willingly letting Draco disarm him right? Or does it not count since Harry didn't really die?
Oliver Lee because voldemort didn't disarm harry.harry didn't try to fight with his wand. he just stood there. but dumbledore was holding his wand when draco disarmed him. allegiance didn't change because of death. even if harry had died in the forest the elder wand would nit have changed allegiance
Oliver Lee because Dumbledore didn't willingly let Draco disarm him. Draco didn't belong to the Dumledores and Snapes plan, he was not supposed to be there at all, so it was accidental and unwanted "defeat"
wand always chooses its master and Dumbledore was not willingly letting Draco disarm him, he just focused on petrifying Harry and lost precious seconds to be able to block disarming spell, he was very weak and slow. plus it is not about disarming, but conquering. the whole DA was practicing disarming among each other, you cannot honestly think the allegiance of their wands were switching among all of them within seconds ... even if Draco did not disarm Dumbledore and Snape killed him like that, the wand would not pass to Snape, because they made a deal about the "murder" so it was not a defeat.
No true death has the wand switch allegiance, however, Voldemort didn't kill Harry, he killed a part of himself that was in Harry, the wand didn't care as Harry had survived, he wasn't disarmed and he wasn't actually killed, he came close to death but didn't actually die, now if Harry chose to move on instead of going back then the wand would have switched allegiances.
Dumbledore made a deal with Snape so the allegiance of Elder Wand would die with him and Voldemort never possess its power. He did not plan of having Draco to disarm him and probably never expect the allegiance would change with a simple disarming charm. Plus, Draco used his own wand to disarm Elder Wand, thus it became his. Meanwhile, Voldemort tried to kill Harry using a wand that belong to Harry all the time. He didn't disarm Harry, instead he immediately used Avada Kedavra curse on him. Harry willingly let Voldemort kill him, so the allegiance still hadn't changed, therefore Elder Wand wouldn't kill Harry.
Snape did not know harry had to die until the half blood prince. Dumbledore only told Snape the year of his death, after the argument between Snape, and Dumbledore that Hagrid partly overheard.
Griphook didn't die in a fire in the movies, Voldemort killed him (in the book canon we don't know what happened). Snape was very miffed to hear the boy, as much as he disliked him, was being raised to die. Also what's so 'finally explained' about this video. There is nothing new here, we all knew all of this!
err... actually a VERY key detail of WHY Harry 'transports' to the purgatory-esque version of Kings Cross, and gets to decide whether or not he simply wants to indeed die or get back to real life, you didn't touch on at all. And it's something from the end of book 4. Voldemort arrogantly & short sightedly uses some of Harry's own blood in his ritual to gain back a physical body. So from that moment til the end of book 7, Voldemort had Harry's blood in his veins, meaning he also carried the magic that was Lily's sacrifice in saving Harry's life as a baby to begin with (why Harry was always untouchable when going back to the Dursley's in summer, since Petunia as her sister perpetuated that protective magic). So Voldemort unknowingly essentially created an unbreakable, never ending tether from himself to Harry, that Harry wouldn't be ever able to truly die if at the same time Voldemort himself was still alive. and Dumbledore knew this is the situation that had now been established ever since Harry got back to Hogwarts from the graveyard and told him the whole V-rebirth story at the end of book 4. Exactly what Dumbledore thought and had been hoping would happen. That 'tether' is what provided the choice that Harry was then able to fully exercise himself when in that mystical Kings Cross. He could've simply still died, but was able to return to life. Admittedly they didn't do a good job of explaining this point in the film at all, in fact I believe they omit it entirely, in which case to films-only viewers it may even seem like something of a plot hole. But of course that Kings Cross conversation between Harry & Dumbledore is literally about 50x as long in the book lol (and worth every word)
Actually Dobby didn't have the shard of the mirror that Harry used. It was just a fragment of a piece of the mirror that Sirius had given Harry that allowed him to speak to the person who had the other mirror. And, since Aberforth had the other that's what allowed him to send Dobby to go and save Harry from Malfoy Manor.
"The Ending Of Harry Potter Finally Explained"! What?! you just discribed the last movie!!!!! so you made this vid for someone who didnt saw the movie?!!! "Finally Explaind"... for blind and deaf people.
Thanks for watching! Check us out everywhere else for more cool stuff:
Instagram → instagram.com/looperhq/
Facebook → facebook.com/loopermoviestv/
Looper I loved the little nostalgia trip; but the contents of this video were already known by the majority of HP fans....sorry. :)
Looper this video is condescending trash.
Looper Just to let you know the wand part is wrong the wand was loyal to Voldemort cause it was gellert grindleward who stole it
What he said ^ times 10000 Condescending sheeeeeet
The elder wand's allegiance switched to Harry's when Harry disarmed Draco at Malfoy Manor but you show a clip of them dueling in a Hogwarts restroom. Griphook didn't die at Gringotts during the escape. He was killed by Voldemort when Voldemort summoned everyone that worked at Gringotts to Malfoy Manor after Harry and friends escaped with the cup.
Yup, I still cry at when Snape says "always". Also because Alan rickman was my favourite actor of all time and it still leaves me in pieces knowing that he isn't here any more
Katina me too! I miss him so much...
Always.
harry potter's All movie is best.daniel radcliffe 👌👌👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👏👏
God I wish Hogwarts was real and I could go
To bad i killed you snape
For those asking why it needed explanation: I just watched all of these movies for the first time recently, and I've never read the books. It was a lot to take in, so videos like this are helpful.
How amazing would it of been if it showed Harry, Ron and Hermione being teachers at Hogwarts and watching their kids be sorted into houses and applauding them. I really wanted to see that more than just waving them off in the train
SavageRicktator yeah
Clapping them isn’t the best way to put it.... clapping at them it should be
Remy yea otherwise it sounds wrong
Nah don’t like it
True..very true..”YOU ARE A POTTERHEAD-LY TRUE…
I tried to be funny but-
tomorrow: "why Michael Jackson doesn't make music anymore"
Because he is dead
Lol
iZeR He died.
Danielle Dewitt r/whoosh
Parthiba Researcher thanks dr obvious
This video screams "we've only seen the movies"
Muhammed Joosub just like all the fans who don’t like Ginny
I know don't make videos when you know nothing
Ginny knows what it's like to be effected by voldemort from a young age, she was possessed at 11 and lost most of a year of her life because of him. Everyone else had family members killed or were tortured or both because of him. Ginny also lost family. You've also got in the books that it wasn't a one off thing, I always saw it it as Rowlin wanting to give harry a happy ending but not turn it into a romance book. So all of the relationship happened off screen, it wasn't what was important to the story, that was the whole Voldemort trying to kill him thing.
😂😂😂
Yeah his info and timeline were way off.
This did not all happen i Harry's head. Hogwarts is real, and I'm sure my letter will come one day
AaP2PRO yes! some who understands that one day we will be going to hogwarts!! 😀
I hope I'm a wizard with harry someday if he's alive
I am currently 11, and on the 29th of august, where my birthday is, which is VERY soon, i will not be able to get the letter after that!!!!!
I only have a few days left!!!!!
NOOOOOO
Jk ;)
It's a S. A. D life dude
@Dolphin Gaming, I hope you're at Hogwarts now, how were the first weeks?
It was the duel at malfoy manor when harry got the ownership of the elder wand not the duel in the bathroom
Darth Star Killer lol i thought the same.
Indrani Das me to
Darth Star Killer that's what Harry says I swear these top 10 vid channels never do actual research
He didn't say it was. He just chose an odd clip to show there.
I knoww.. i cringed so hard.. also Griphook didnt die with dragon fire he Voldy killed him..! the "triangular mirror" was not possessed by the elf (his name is Dobby btw) . Harry had it all along. Sirius gifted that mirror to him..
When he said "is this in my head?" It's obvious he was asking about the temporary realm he was in, not the whole damn plot. That's just as idiotic as the walking dead theory in which Rick is dreaming the whole time.
There is nothing to explain. The ending is self-explanatory.
This. How can there be any confusion?
The only thing that needed explaining was why didn't Harry die in the forest.
elgranqenk2 I was literally bout to comment the same thing
@@Zerath0 Read the book and you will find your answer
You right
He didn't snap the wand in half in the books, he repairs his own wand and puts the elder wand back in dumbledore's grave.
Warren Thomas no he put it on Dumbledores desk
No the wand go back to Dumbledore and " because the last master dies the wand will stop working" so when harry pass on the next person to looking for elder wand it wont work because the allegiance to harry and because he was never disarmed or defeated in a duel the wand wont work for the next master.
Makes me wonder what would happen if you put a wand in Harry's dead hands and then disarmed him. Would the Elder Wand count that? xD
Kye Guard LOL
I think it would become yours after killing him, no disarming needing (if I can remember the history). Just kill Harry in his sleep, then take the wand. Now it's yours.
Sorry to be one of "those" book fans. but there's just a couple things to clarify:
1. Harry didn't break the wand in the book, he used it to fix his original one, then put it back in Dumbledore's grave
2. When Dumbledore suggests that Harry could "board a train" the meaning was that the train would take him "on" (as in on to the afterlife, or something of the sort), not back to life.
And the Whole mirror thing.. this guy in the video says "the Elf" (the name is Dobby btw) possessed the mirror... Sirius had given him the mirror and kept the pair with him..! When Mundungus Fletcher stole things from the house he stole the mirror too and sold it to Aberforth (whose reflection harry sees not Albus's) who sends Dobby for help..!!..
He should have read the books.. well wait the starting of Deathly hallows part 1 they show harry with that piece of mirror ..!! uhh!! its not a book or movie thing .!! this guy does not know it.. he is a muggle !
Don't be sorry about being a book fan when the books are made into movies. For the most part this series was adapted very well. Deathly Hallows changed and omitted some HUGE things. One was the Elder Wands fate. HATED that! Harry repair your wand! I was also very disappointed in the final battle between Harry and Voldemort. I wanted to see all the Death Eaters get defeated by our characters.
Your #2 is the narrator not knowing what he is talking about. They need to get someone who is competent and make sure their info is correct.
Ay_dree_n I was disappointed with the final battle in the movie... how nevil killed nagini, how harry and Voldemort fought in the great hall
How harry and repeated what his mother had done with the love curse
So many disappointments
greedsongwriter I mean I liked when Neville killed nagini
greedsongwriter say bruh hold up, Neville needed something other than his speech he's was protrayed as clumsy goofball until the deathly hallows he's the definition of character development
"After all this time"
"Always"
"Did U puta ur nAme ina gobbblet ov fiarre"
asked calmly
What is there to explain lmao
Playsnetwork nothing just need to put our a daily video so they stay in the search results.
Video is pointless.
After a few years of watching the movies/reading the books, you forget stuff like this. Not everyone concentrates solely on one series.
I only came here because I couldn't work out why it would need to exist. Kinda annoyed I gave them a view now.
I'm a casual fan, and I don't have the time to read every page of every book. So, this video was helpful in pointing out some details that totally went over my head.
After 8 movies, i really wanted a turn-around arc for Draco. I know he turns good in the end but i wish they went in depth!
Personally I believe the "of course it's in your head" line was a nod towards the fans. As we read the books they played out in our own minds, we visualised everything, as lots of us consider ourselves not muggles, I think it was a nod to us that while we know it's not real, how much the books/franchise meant to us is real and valid.
Did you know Harry Potter is a Wizard also? pfft
Verified person, 3 years ago, 50 likes, and no replies..
I am your 51th like and first reply
ikr
Great video. But Griphook wasn't killed by the dragon; he was killed by Voldemort after he realized that the Gringotts vault had been raided, during the slaughter montage in front of the Malfoys.
films for u
i knowww i cringed so hard when he said that .. Also the "triangular Mirror" was not possessed by the elf (the name is Dobby btw) ... Sirius had gifted the mirror to him in year four or five.. serious had the pair and they could communicate through that.. when Mundungus Fletcher stole things form the house he stole the mirror too and Aberforth (dumbledore's brother) bought it.. its his reflection harry sees and mistakes for Albus and its him who sends "The Elf" to save them ..!!
Prateek Sachdeva he says dobby like three seconds before "the elf" calm down
ala it's still wrong XD
Prateek Sachdeva is he not an elf.
I've always thought that when he asks "is this all inside my head" he means is he actually talking to dumbledore and also it has to be real because the first chapter of the first book is from uncle vernons point of view and that proves that it's not just him making things up
It could have been Harrys imagination of Vernons view
Jba 99
Then explain fantastical beasts it's real in the series.
Cindy Weckwerth Exactly! He's not asking if his adventures were real he's asking if the King's Row limbo was real!
There are several episodes in the books (mostly or exclusively at the start of those books) that happen outside Harry's consciousness, including Scrimgeour's and Fudge's meeting with the Mugggle Prime Minister in Book 6 (which also mentions several earlier meetings between the Prime Minister and Fudge) and the Death Eaters' meeting in Book 7.
Harry knew he was still alive. When he asked Dumbledore if it's real or inside his head Dumbledore says it's both. The fact that Harry met a dead person although he wasn't dead means that he never talked to Dumbledore, but to himself. He was actually realizing what happened the time he was in a kinda coma state. Then he woke up but pretended to be dead. So it was all inside his head but that didn't make it unreal
Your explanation is wrong... Harry doesn't become the owner of elder wand by casting the rectusecptrum spell but by stantching his wand in Malfoy Manor in the deathly hallows part I...
suri4Musiq these guys don’t really know what they are talking about
Lol ikr how is the rectusecptrum spell even relevant
They had the wrong movie clip. Extremely poor editing and knowledge on their part.
Dude it is Sectumsempra
Challenges Buster och Georg lool I knew it sounded weird oh well
"Always"
?
what do you mean?
Rebecca Stevenson Snape's words
Always.
People need to READ THE DAMN BOOKS if they can't understand the ending. The movie ending and the book ending are different. The movie doesn't explain the whole story, although it DOES explain how Harry was the master of the Elder wand, if people just take the time to pay attention.
Eric DiMemmo the movie ending isn't just different? It got raped for the sake of cgi and a dramatic finale
what is the name of book?? i want read
Eric DiMemmo If anyone hasn't yet read the books, START FROM THE BEGINNING READING THEM NOW! If you aren't patient enough to read, listen to the audiobooks! The differences are so many, you will feel like you are on a new Harry Potter adventure!!!
Ahmad Usman the book is called "harry potter and the deathly hollows", but it's better to read all of them
I do agree the books are WAY better but they do literally explain a lot in Deathly Hallows Part 2. We get Snape's backstory and CLEAR allegiance and intentions. Deathly Hallows explained and how Harry is the master of the Elder Wand, Harry is a Horcrux.
"Finally Explained" these are all just plot details that are covered either in the movies or in the books, you didn't go in depth at all. No effort was put into this video
Isa Hamilton they even said some stuff wrong haha
I agree, he needs to actually read the fucking books do some research and stop pretending he's a Harry Potter fan cause he's an actual dick
Harry Potter is the best.
Katalabix Amen brother
Dan's Channel Got is amazing but cmpared to Harry it is a shit😂
Matyáš Nazaretský Lol I hope you're joking.
Matyáš Nazaretský lol hahaha great joke hahaha haha
Darragh oh my friends youre a funny group😂😂 im hoping youre the ones that are joking😂😂
When Harry asked if it was in his head, I don't think he was talking about the entire adventure, from when he first got his letter to then, I think he was talking about his discussion with Dumbledore after he was struck by Avada Kedavra after all he should have been dead. Besides Dumbledore says 'why should that make it any less real.' I don't believe the OH IT WAS ALL A DREAM ending at all. That also just strips the magic off of everything.
The clip you showed of Harry disarming Malfoy was before Dumbledore was killed. He actually gained control of the elder wand when he was captured in Malfor Manor, and he ran over and grabbed Draco’s wand when he was leaving.
Griphook was not killed by dragon! It was the manager of bank. Voldemort killed griphook once he found that he helped harry enter the vault.
Is it bad that every time I watch part 2 I get the same "end of the series feels" as the 1st time I watched... Literally the best movie series of all time
Harry won the loyalty of the Elder Wand from malfoy at the malfoy mansion plzz correct it...
Why correct that tiny piece of the video when the whole video is wrong? Just delete the video!
Just want to say that in the books, rather than breaking the wand, Harry fixed is old wand with it, then returned it to Dumbledore's grave, a much better ending than the one presented in the film
"Always."
Will forever be my most favorite line from this franchise.
Harry Potters ending finally explained... Theres literally nothing to explain.
Finally explained?! Everyone knew this already lmao 😂😂
Emperor Reign didn’t explain anything. In fact, half of this is wrong lol. Boarding a train meant he was moving on lol. Harry literally says that the elder wand is his, and Harry wasn’t quickly over taken by Voldemort lol
There's a troll in the comments!!!!
Emperor Reign yes
Yeah this guy is an idiot and their "facts" are definitely wrong.
Psyko I don't think Dumbledore predicted that. His focus was getting Voldemort mortal so he can be defeated by anyone really. Harry was the first choice to potentially do so. Harry disarming Draco was all Harry's doing.
I liked Dumbledore so much that when he died, I suffered from crippling depression
UmRaGaming I sure didn't. But I mean I have no feelings for anyone or anybody.
UmRaGaming me too 😢
UmRaGaming I suffered from Osteirperosis
I cried myself sick when he died!! Still do!! Whenever I watch a Potter marathon
I was semi depressed for a couple of days. But I was 12, so yeah..
You only said the obvious things and the things we already knew.
What about the questions:
Why did Voldemort turned into ashes?
What will happen to the Malfoy family?
Will the Cursed Child be a movie too?
Aldrich Luna
Question 1: After all the horcrux’s were destroyed Voldemort had 0.75% of his soul left. When they had that last confrontation Voldemort’s killing curse rebounded onto him and the ash part is just for dramatization.
Question: 2 because the malfoy’s left Voldemort and he death eaters they were pardon from a sentence to Azkaban, Draco married and had a son Scorpius and he went to Hogwarts
Question 3: J.K. Rowling confirmed that the cursed child would not get a movie, but there are four more fantastic beasts movies coming.
Yes, there will be a film and STORY book in 2018.
still doesn't explain why he turned to ashes. did he turn to ashes in the book? I can't remember.
He said for dramatization. That's explaining it in the most common sense.
eames no, I died like a normal person.
Harry Potter is love❣
,Harry Potter is life👔👓🚂
Alisha W ⚡️👓👨👔👖👞👑👑👑
So from the books I was under the impression Harry was not killed by Voldemort because he was actually in possession of all 3 deathly hallows. He carried the cloak and stone with him and the wand was not only present but was his as the video says. This made Harry the master over death and thus he went to the king's cross vision as at that point he was now allowed to choose whether he lived or died. The Dumbledore he met there was in fact Death and instead of choosing to die himself he chose to kill the piece of Voldemort instead.
"Instead, he snapped the Elder Wand in half" ...In the movie, read the damn book and it's different! 🙄😕
Did the voice-over ever say that harry snapped the wand in the book?
JOJO KLAAGZAK I don’t recall it being stated in the book. IIRC, it was just stated that the wand was placed back in Dumbledore’s grave.
True evil doesn't need a nose
I've always hated Voldemort's death in the movie. Voldemort feared two things above all else: death and not being special. His death in the book left his remains as just one more corpse after the battle. He was dead and he was not special. But in the movie he disintegrates, which not only means there is no body, it means that future generations who might worship Voldemort can imagine that he's still out there somewhere. In an effort to find a unique/cool visual, the movie ruined a large part of what made Voldemort's death so satisfying in the first place.
Snaps was so misjudged by almost everyone but after seeing what he did for Harry and his family he truly became a hero
5:55 that smile
Snape: "Just use expelliarmus"
Voldemort: "But I'm Voldemort!"
Always from 0 to 10 with Voldemort, never a reasonable solution.
do "Why Hollywood won't cast Paul Walker Anymore"
cuz thats funny
Hector Zeroni 😂😂😂😂that was fucking great
MystiCalBEING89 it is
Hector Zeroni. So freaking funny!!
+Asia it happen years ago now. When is it not too soon?
I have to disagree with your statement about Snape not caring that Harry may have to die in order to defeat the Dark Lord. It was made very clear in the books and in his memories that when he found out how Dumbledore had been "raising him like a pig for slaughter" and to "die at the right moment", it struck a chord for him. Especially since he vowed to protect him for the sake of Lily's memory and to make sure she didn't die in vain. He may have not cared for the sole reason of loving or even liking Harry, but he did care.
If you read the book you would understand the ending
Bro although this video is kinda old now, I just wanted to say that I love you for using the Interstellar reference on min 3:02! That poem is such an amazing thing of art and always reminds me of one of the greatest films ever made (besides harry potter ofc).
"Finally Explained"
*clears throat, throws hair back*
"Let's see then!"
2 underrated heroes
Barty Crouch jr:
He used the imperius spell on Harry so Harry knew how to protect him from it
Vernon Dursley:
Vernon knew that He-Who-Must-Not-Be-Named was going to kill Harry so he wanted to lock him in at Privity Drive so You-know-who won't find him
I wonder what Audiences' reactions would have been like if at the end of The Deathly Hallows part 2 after the screen went black but right before the credits appeared, it played an unreleased deleted scene from the Sorcerer's stone showing Harry waking up in his closet room under the stairs and then walking out to discover that he had been dreaming the entire time, and that none of the events from all 8 films had actually taken place. And we, the audience would come to realize that the filmmakers had been planning this all along, upon seeing an 11 year old Daniel Radcliffe unexpectedly appear onscreen. And we would then realize that Harry's tragic orphan life with his Aunt and Uncle would be all that he'd ever know... and that there was never any magic.
that potentially would have ruined the entire series for me
Louis Auto - I couldn't agree more.
It was all a dream is such a stupid ending to almost any story.
Rert 78 ikr that's everyone's go-to theory on these types of movies and books
he should get an oscar for seeing such an epic dream 😂😂
The reason Harry did not die from the killing curse that Harry accepted was because Voldemort has some of Harry’s blood and Lily’s protection thus making it impossible for him to die while Voldemort lived.
deez wands ain't loyal.
Harry DID NOT gain mastery of the Elder Wand during the brief duel with Malfoy in the Hogwarts bathroom. It was when he disarmed him at Malfoy Manor after just prior to Dobby’s rescue and death.
Sadly, this didn't answer the one thing about Deathly Hallows that I never understood. Why exactly does Voldemort die at the end? It's not like Harry cast a killing curse or anything?
Otterinmywater Harry knocked the spell back at him. He was very unstable because the horcruxes were gone.
EM11212 Yeah, but surely Avada Kadava doesn't disintegrate you? And what the crap did Molly cast on Bellatrix?! It's like the writers didn't want the bad guys to leave corpses or something.
Ya in the books Voldemort doesn't disintegrate he just kinda keels over with a thud. Same with Bellatrix in the books she just kinda falls to the ground dead. Not sure why they changed it in the movies. Maybe to make the deaths look less real, and be more kid friendly??
Otterinmywater that was just the movies being dramatic
Otterinmywater There are lots of things which the movies messed up.
One of the best scenes in the book was the time when Harry after gaining the elder wand repairs his own broken wand.
Then he leaves the elder wand at the professors table. This hints that the elder wand is indestructible. But they just snap it off in the movies. Like no one has ever thought of destroying the most dangerous weapin in the world.
Thanks for the video. I've read all the books and movies of course left plenty out and changed so many things. One thing I'll mention you said in the video is that Griphook died in the fire fight from the dragon when the trio mounted the dragon to escape Gringotts. That's not how he died. He was killed by Lord Voldermort in the Malfoy mansion when he realized another Horcrox had been taken.
Harry not dying because he was a Horcrux is a common misconception, and only a film theory. Harry didn’t die because Voldemort possessed Harry’s blood, which hosted Lily’s protective charm she cast on Harry when she died for him. So long as Voldemort was alive and kept that enchantment active, it anchors Harry to life unless Harry chooses not to live. The part of Voldemort’s soul vanquishing in Harry when he got hit was an added bonus.
I get chills every time the music in the pensieve scene plays
"ALWAYS" Damn it i cried AGAIN.
_"It does not do good to dwell on dreams and forget to live."_
It all makes sense now.
I don’t really think the ending needs explaining
Hypnotic Turtle The spell rebounded, and that’s pretty deep r/iam14andthatsdeep
i just need the king's cross station scene explaining the rest i understand
how come Voldemort didn’t die when Harry was dead
The Plothole that always gets me is the Elder Wand. How can Voldemort kill Harry in the woods, if the Elder Wand's master is Harry. You cannot use the wand against its own Master or wielder.
When you are out of ideas...
Worst ending in Harry Potter. So many loopholes in the movie that make no sense.
1. How can Voldemort use the elder wand “too hard” to the point that it’s splits?
2. So Harry was able to “kill” Voldemort by Expelliarmus because….. well why? How was he able to do that in the movie?? In the book, JK goes through extensive detail explaining how Voldemort never mastered the elder wand because it belonged to Harry after he disarmed Malfoy who disarmed Dumbledore. The movie never once mentions this.
3. The train station scene in the book was possibly the best dialogue in the whole series. It was filled with emotion, realization, and optimism. There was also lots of detail about why Harry got there after Voldemort “killed” him. In the movie, it’s a 2 minute scene with the worst Dumbledore cast.
Honestly, these movies will always have a place in my heart. But Deathly Hallows 2 was seriously disappointing.
well dont need to add cursed child in it😑😑
I remember that in the books Harry asked whether him being in kings cross with dumbledore was real not the entire wizarding world
That’s right me liked me own comment
Soooo Nothing new?
You should have gotten people to read the chapter containing the Snape's memory in Book 7. He almost was ready to give up the double agent persona when Dumbeldore suggested this. So he was deeply affected when Dumbeldore suggested Harry needs to die in order to kill Voldemort
There was never any need for explanation. Everyone knew this and if somehow they didn't it's because they didn't pay attention to the movie or didn't watch each movie.
"Finally explained"
Right, because that ending was soooooo cryptic
i have no time to follow those episode saga for another next 40 years from now tire for such story rather than do back my own project
"Finally"... Huh, I thought there was 7 books and 8 movies. Thank goodness you made this video. Or I would have never known..
It's a good explanation, if a little bit late to the party. I think most of this is pretty well known.
better late than never right ? like my reply from your comment 4 years back 😂🤣
Actually I am just getting to watch Harry Potter for the first time lol so this explanation is definitely needed for the new ppl.
The true ending in the book was that voldemort, in the duel with harry died, and laid there, lifeless. This was the point of the whole story. Tom Riddle died like a human, not a supernatural creature, as he aimed to be.
Wait.. if Voldemort killed Harry with like a gun or knife or something, would Harry stay dead?
Dimwit DAMN IT! I should of thought of that...
No, because Harry was a horcrux and it would only kill the part of Voldemort that was inside of him.
Daniel so if Harry had is head cut off? What would happen?
I don't know, but he'd probably turn into a headless ghost.
Daniel it wouldn’t kill the part of Voldemort in him, would it? EVERYONE knows that you can’t just destroy a horcrux with any old thing and killing the part of Voldemort in Harry would just be destroying a horcrux, wouldn’t it? So, unless he actually did kill Harry with the sword of Gryffindor, he wouldn’t be destroying the part of Voldemort in him, right? I think that if Voldemort did kill Harry with a knife or something, Harry would die but the horcrux in him would still be there, unless a horcrux can’t live in a human that isn’t alive.... I could be completely wrong lol
"Now what did you say He done ? Hey start over I didn't catch all that ?
Ugh, they just said the things we already know
It was in his head?Wtf are you talking about.Dumbledore said that „it was in his head“ he means the time only after his "dead"
The cursed child was not created by JK. That book sucks and is not canon. Even the film's ending is not canon.
The second before he killed Voldemort, Voldemort looked at his wand during the clash and was like, “MADE IN CHINA?”
After many years I've come to realize that the true star of the series is Hermione, she is absolutely brilliant. Harry's all courage and charisma, without Hermione he wouldn't have accomplished anything. But paradoxically, it's Harry's charisma that ultimately influences Hermione to follow him.
Actually it was when harry saved her from the troll in the philosophers stone book
“After kissing his Snitch goodbye.” 🤣
"Finally Explained"😂😂😂😂😂😂
I believe Griphook died at Malfoy Manor when the trio was being held prisoner. He had the dragon kill another goblin so he could escape clean.
What do you mean finally explained you guys literally just said what happened in the books/movies
Personally, I think Dumbledor's words during the train station scene are more of a nod to the phylosophical question of "what is reality". And most definitely those words aren't about the whole adventure, they are only concerning the train station and his (Dumbledor's) presence.
It took you that long to figure it out?
That "cool stuff thing " in the end was sarcastic af😂
So... basically you're just pointing out obvious things from the movies?
Thank You for finally telling us all of this. We weren't sure
If the elder wand didn't pass to Voldermort since Harry willingly let him kill him, why did the elder wand pass to Draco since he was willingly letting Draco disarm him right? Or does it not count since Harry didn't really die?
Oliver Lee because voldemort didn't disarm harry.harry didn't try to fight with his wand. he just stood there. but dumbledore was holding his wand when draco disarmed him. allegiance didn't change because of death. even if harry had died in the forest the elder wand would nit have changed allegiance
Oliver Lee because Dumbledore didn't willingly let Draco disarm him. Draco didn't belong to the Dumledores and Snapes plan, he was not supposed to be there at all, so it was accidental and unwanted "defeat"
wand always chooses its master and Dumbledore was not willingly letting Draco disarm him, he just focused on petrifying Harry and lost precious seconds to be able to block disarming spell, he was very weak and slow. plus it is not about disarming, but conquering. the whole DA was practicing disarming among each other, you cannot honestly think the allegiance of their wands were switching among all of them within seconds ... even if Draco did not disarm Dumbledore and Snape killed him like that, the wand would not pass to Snape, because they made a deal about the "murder" so it was not a defeat.
No true death has the wand switch allegiance, however, Voldemort didn't kill Harry, he killed a part of himself that was in Harry, the wand didn't care as Harry had survived, he wasn't disarmed and he wasn't actually killed, he came close to death but didn't actually die, now if Harry chose to move on instead of going back then the wand would have switched allegiances.
Dumbledore made a deal with Snape so the allegiance of Elder Wand would die with him and Voldemort never possess its power. He did not plan of having Draco to disarm him and probably never expect the allegiance would change with a simple disarming charm. Plus, Draco used his own wand to disarm Elder Wand, thus it became his.
Meanwhile, Voldemort tried to kill Harry using a wand that belong to Harry all the time. He didn't disarm Harry, instead he immediately used Avada Kedavra curse on him. Harry willingly let Voldemort kill him, so the allegiance still hadn't changed, therefore Elder Wand wouldn't kill Harry.
Ahhh the deathly hollows, the ability to give, revert and avoid death, such beauty.
Treakmaster *deathly
Beastgaming FTW thanks man.
If you are true fan it didn't need explaining
Snape did not know harry had to die until the half blood prince. Dumbledore only told Snape the year of his death, after the argument between Snape, and Dumbledore that Hagrid partly overheard.
This video is about 6 years too late
Griphook didn't die in a fire in the movies, Voldemort killed him (in the book canon we don't know what happened).
Snape was very miffed to hear the boy, as much as he disliked him, was being raised to die.
Also what's so 'finally explained' about this video. There is nothing new here, we all knew all of this!
You sound exactly like birdman from Rick and Morty
Bird person.
err... actually a VERY key detail of WHY Harry 'transports' to the purgatory-esque version of Kings Cross, and gets to decide whether or not he simply wants to indeed die or get back to real life, you didn't touch on at all. And it's something from the end of book 4. Voldemort arrogantly & short sightedly uses some of Harry's own blood in his ritual to gain back a physical body. So from that moment til the end of book 7, Voldemort had Harry's blood in his veins, meaning he also carried the magic that was Lily's sacrifice in saving Harry's life as a baby to begin with (why Harry was always untouchable when going back to the Dursley's in summer, since Petunia as her sister perpetuated that protective magic). So Voldemort unknowingly essentially created an unbreakable, never ending tether from himself to Harry, that Harry wouldn't be ever able to truly die if at the same time Voldemort himself was still alive. and Dumbledore knew this is the situation that had now been established ever since Harry got back to Hogwarts from the graveyard and told him the whole V-rebirth story at the end of book 4. Exactly what Dumbledore thought and had been hoping would happen.
That 'tether' is what provided the choice that Harry was then able to fully exercise himself when in that mystical Kings Cross. He could've simply still died, but was able to return to life.
Admittedly they didn't do a good job of explaining this point in the film at all, in fact I believe they omit it entirely, in which case to films-only viewers it may even seem like something of a plot hole. But of course that Kings Cross conversation between Harry & Dumbledore is literally about 50x as long in the book lol (and worth every word)
Bit late aren't you?
Will Rich He is almost a decade late
He probably needed to read the books
Actually Dobby didn't have the shard of the mirror that Harry used. It was just a fragment of a piece of the mirror that Sirius had given Harry that allowed him to speak to the person who had the other mirror. And, since Aberforth had the other that's what allowed him to send Dobby to go and save Harry from Malfoy Manor.
"The Ending Of Harry Potter Finally Explained"! What?! you just discribed the last movie!!!!! so you made this vid for someone who didnt saw the movie?!!! "Finally Explaind"... for blind and deaf people.