Fujifilm X100V vs Ricoh GR 3 for everyday use | which should YOU buy?
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 28 พ.ค. 2024
- You might want to get yourself a Ricoh GRIII street edition or a Fujifilm X100V but you might also wonder which one is best for your needs and if you are planning on using it for everyday, which one is best? What should you consider before buying one or the other?
-
My website: www.crisphotography.info
My Instagram: @cris_photo_graphy
@cris_weddings
--
Thanks to hooksounds.com for their amazing music!
Check out their website and get 10% discount with this link and code: www.hooksounds.com/ref/estala... and use the code CRIS10
Although sometimes I am a bit jealous about some photos taken with X100V, whenever I see the camera itself in real, I am so glad to have a GR III. It has been my extended eye because of its' pocketability.
I hear you! Makes sense if you’re looking for something on the small, compact yet powerfully side 😎 cheers!
exactly! I have better cameras than GR, and they stay home or in a bag, because convenience. Fuji looks better. so?
Just wanted to say how much I appreciated your very fair and balanced review of these two cameras... you went out of your way to make sure you gave credit where credit was due and explain each aspect very well... very refreshing and helpful!
Thanks a lot for your kind message - much appreciated! Glad you enjoyed it and that it was helpful - take care!
The price difference is huge. I feel you should give GR 2 points on that. 😂
Hi Cris. Great comparison. I fully agree with you. I own both cameras as well. For me every aspect of shooting with the X100V is so enjoyable. But the portability of the GRIII Street Edition is excellent which makes it an perfect edc camera taking the picture quality into account. Owning both is a lovely.
Awesome! Thanks for your feedback!
A very interesting video, Cris. It is always good to get a person's viewpoint on different cameras and yours was nicely thought out and well presented. Thanks.
Thanks a lot for your feedback and glad you enjoyed the video!
Thanks for sharing.. Was looking into buying one of these but didn't know which was better for me
You’re very welcome. Hopefully you found the best choice for you
Cheers
I think the price difference fact relates to the tilting screen, the OVF/EVF and hybrid viewfinder, the built-in flash, the lcd resolution, the microphone port, the wider aperture, Bluetooth, the battery life (420 vs 200), fps speed (30) and max video resolution. Plus weather sealing always makes cameras more expensive. Like you said before, these cameras belong to different segments.
Hello Abelardo, thanks a lot for your feedback and yes, you got all the points right there! If you take into account that the optional viewfinder for the Ricoh alone costs 250$ you can see that Fuji ain't a bad deal and that it has a lot to offer. Take care
dope review !
I would have liked to know about the autofocus performance though !
and the video !! have you tried vlogging with the ricoh ?
and +1 point for fuji for a tilty screen
Thanks man!
I tried making an everyday life usage review more than a too technical review of both. Might do a review separately with AF Performance, image quality of the DNG, video quality and performances, etc.
Haha thought about the tilting screen but it wasn’t a criteria for me (the screen of the Fuji also has a better resolution btw). 😜
Good comparison. I just purchased the Ricoh last week. My primary reason is that in the U.S. the X100V has been on backorder for at least a year. Same for the XE4. I already have a collection of Fuji bodies and glass so I do not feel like I gave up much. Plus I gained portability.
Oh wow in the IS too hum? Same for Germany, France and England (got lots of comments on that). Cool on your Ricoh - enjoy!
That’s funny
That’s the reason I purchased the Ricoh as well last year. After having the Ricoh I now know I won’t even bother with the Fuji.
I used the same rationale to justify buying a iii street edition for like 620. 💯
@@alfonsovegaiii Ricoh owes some money to Fuji - their supply chain issues must be an absolute boon for Ricoh sales
You can get an adapter to put a hood and filter on the GR3... Also Ricoh has accessory lenses that can be adapted. Really these cameras compliment each other... The positive film and the hi BW profiles are excellent.
True true 👍🏼 those are good points
Went with the 100V as still have my X70 if I want to go smaller and full on stealth mode on the streets. The Ricoh has always tempted me but the build quality issues and dust ingress reports have held me back tbh.... great review btw 👌
Awesome! It’s a great little camera 📸 enjoy it!
I have an xt4 and the x100v and love both. But I’m always about trying new ways to get images without carrying a lot of gear esp when traveling. I also love the Sony rx10 which is a bridge camera but it can do everything albeit with a few sacrifices (smaller sensor, smaller evf etc) and it’s not pocketable. But 24-200 at constant 2.8 is a real plus. This Ricoh has always tempted me ever since I shot with the lomo lc-a back in the day.
I hear you! Makes sense
A Friend of mine gave me the GRIII for a weekend as I was complaining that I can’t use all my nice cameras so often anymore since my second kid was born. I have a Leica SL-2S, Leica M2, Hasselblad X-pan, Hasselblad 500cm. All this beautiful cameras take time and effort to be operated. If you need a quick one hand operable camera, you will give a sh.. about the beauty of the x100v. This is all just for some latte macchiato beside my camera instagram victims. And by the way. The GR has film simulations and there are people even creating their own recipes for the GR. There is also a tele converter lens for the GR available, as well as other accessories. This is something I found out over my two day testing, so don’t know how well you even tested your GR. Please take a second look!
Thanks for the feedback! True true… I did however shoot the north of both my kids with a 100F and 100V and couldn’t be happier. Felt it was more discreet than the LCD option only. That been said, the Ricoh is SO small and silent and compact… would have been as good as my x100 cameras! As I said in an earlier comment yes, there are some accessories for the Ricoh but what is the point in terms of grip and ergonomics to add all that to such a small camera? You could also put a cage around it, etc. I think fuji has more possibilities (still) and can use these batter. Also - make a 18.3 (28mm) wider?? Why in hell would you want to do that for a compact camera? Not sure about that one
I much prefer the photos coming out the gr. Including the film simulations. Classic chrome on fuji is nice, but the ricoh has gorgeous black and whites, and the positive film is 👌🏻👌🏻👌🏻 i just desperately want ricoh to drop a gr4. The high iso and autofocus in the dark just isn't where i want it. My new iPhone 14 has better noise performance, and its a quarter of the sensor size
👍🏼
Very nice comparison. Good job!
Thanks!
THANKS CRIS !!
You’re ver welcome 😉
I really like your unbiased approach to this video! I know which camera I’m going to buy
Thanks man
Now, that was well worth listening to. Thanks, it's really appreciated - it’s a decision that has haunted me for a year, and I still use my iPhone and old Olympus OMD. But the new fuji x100 series is slated to be released in the first half of 2024 - so that is my choice, and you helped me to come to that decision. Great video.
And your comment makes it well worth making this video! Thanks and glad it could be helpful to you 😉 take care
Your review is excellent and I agree with your final conclusion that the X100V is the better camera, especially if its your only camera. It has everything Fujifilm is famous for in a small package. It would be a great second camera for a Fuji professional who likes to use 2 cameras at the same time. The GR3 might be a better choice if you already have the Fuji thing going and want to add it to your kit for its small size, so I'm tempted to get one. I already have a XT-1 & XT-3. The lack of accessories needed for the GRIII is a good thing that makes it a truly minimal camera kit with great capabilities. I hope that Fujifilm comes out with a budget version of the X100V that would assume the role the X70 filled, as a budget 18mm X100S, and compete with the GR3. Until then, I am tempted to get the GR3. It has IBIS and costs $100 less than the Fujifilm XF18mm 1.4. It probably produces as good an image as any Fujifilm lens does at 18mm and it fits in your pants pocket.
Thanks Fred and ver much agreed with your points! Thanks for sharing your setup and your views on these 2 cameras. Take care
I bought them both and I like them both. They're keepers.
Nice!
Wow this was an excellent comparo. Subbed instantly. Love both cameras btw. But that fuji is beautiful.
Thanks for subscribing and glad this was helpful to you! 😀
Great video. They make a Wide and Tele Converter for the GRIIIX
There are also lens hoods for the Ricoh
Thanks Gaston. Yes that’s correct 👍🏼
In my opinion the only common thing between these two cameras is the size of the sensor. Other than that the GRIII is just simply a point and shoot camera, while the fuji is a range finder, and offers more to the table , control dials , flash , OVF/EVF, film simulations, better video features...
Very true 👌🏼
It’s not a true rangefinder, I guess you have never shot a real one
Nice review. Both are great options.
What strap is that on the Fuji?
thanks Craig! The strap is from 7artisans
Cheers
Great video as always, love your content😊👍🏽
What about battery life between the two?..approximately how many shots each on full charge?
Thank you🙏🏽
Thanks a lot - much appreciated!
The Ricoh is promoted as having around 200 shots in a single charge while the 100v can hold up to around 350 shots with the EVF and around 420 with the OVF. That means almost double the Ricoh (due to its LCD screen always on). Hope that helps - take care
@@cris_photography Thank you Cris 😊👍🏽🙏🏽
The Ricoh is a great companion if your spouse/partner is sick of you bringing gear everywhere. I like to document stuff, and when I'm at fancy restaurants, a camera bag doesn't quite match the vibe. The Ricoh is amazing and I got many high quality images I wouldn't have gotten with just a smartphone.
The lens is also crazy crazy sharp. Far better than I expected. Then again, it was a rental and I've no idea how it would hold up to prolonged pocket use. It might get dust eventually.
Very good points you bring up - thanks!
Restaurant scenario is painful with a big camera and lens set. I used to hide the big thing on my legs under the table. And suddenly the food comes, I take it out and surprise my friends.
So true. I think people underestimate the importance of having a small camera that can do big things, especially in public situations like restaurants or street photography where you don’t want a larger camera being noticed. We need more of these very small ASP-C cameras like Ricoh. 🙂
Great video. I do have a question. I know Fuji has the simulations, but how is the color science out of the Rico? Is at least comparable?
Good question Mathew! I find the DNGs to be very good on the Ricoh camera and the JPEGs have a very punchy b&w. The film simulations of fuji though are what they are and that - imo - is not as good on the Ricoh. Probably going to make a separate follow up video to talk about that too. Cheers
@@cris_photography awesome, looking forward to that video.
agree with all you said .... owned both.... love both.... x100v is just a beautiful camera to hold and look at..... gr3 got me most of the bangers.... i prefer 28 than 35 !!!
oh i sold x100v and kept gr3 btw
Nice! Thanks for sharing your personal experience 😉
Japanese people like GR, because Daido Moriyama had used it. I have GR3, GR3X and Fuji X100F. I had used GR3 many times after Fuji. But when take the picture in day light, It is difficult to see the monitor of GR, because of sun light. It is problem to confirm the composition and focus. So recently I use more Fuji that I can put my eye close to the finder. GR has big problem for AF when you want to take picture in the dark situation. Usually AF of GR is more slowly than Fuji, too. When I want to use manual focus, Fuji is better that I can use dial. Good point of GR is discreet.
Thanks a lot for the extra points - I 100% agree with you. Take care
i own both and i guess depend on what use . if you wan slow and fancy day bring out the fuji . going cycling or hiking? bring the GR iii .
Very true 👍🏼
Hey Cris, thanks for the video! PLEASE tell me where you got the shutter button at 4:37 - I need to get one!
Thanks mate. I bought it on Amazon Germany at the time if I remember right 😄 take care
Another great video, my friend!
Thanks for the kind words Juan!
Thanks for the review, you made some very good and valid points. Undoubtedly (in my opinion) the Fuji is the better camera (& significantly more expensive) BUT, most people buy the Ricoh because it is truly pocketable …… and if “pocketable” (always with you) is your purchasing criteria, then Ricoh is the natural choice. I imagine the majority of Ricoh users also own a “traditional” camera too - Cheers - Peter.
Absolutely Peter - very good point 😉
💯
I like this comparison. I'm a Nikon photographer but was looking for something more compact to take with me every day. I couldn't decide between these two cameras. I then took the Ricoh and man I love this camera. I simply have a full-fledged camera with an APSC (!) sensor in my pocket. Literally your pocket. The Fuji in comparison is of course much more beautiful. Nevertheless, I would choose the Ricoh again.
Awesome! It’s a good choice - can’t go wrong 😉 cheers
I enjoyed your comparison overall. Being a Fuji shooter perhaps I have my biases so I hope my comments are taken with a grain of salt. I really don’t feel I am in a position to assert which camera is better. I can say, however, that the X100 camera series are beyond qualification about a very singular experience that most closely approximates shooting with old film cameras. I came into photography 3/4 of a century ago. Digital photography and that type of analog/mechanical experience are completely different activities. In that analog photographic experience from before the end of the XX century there was a dimension of intimacy and of being part of the mechanical system resulting in the capture of the moment. A Tesla for example may be a more advanced car but the automobile-istic experience of driving an old British Morgan cannot be matched by a computer on wheels. The Fuji X100 series miracle is on how well they integrate the shooter into that old days experience of art and craft with commensurate results. I shoot an xt-4 and an x100s. The xt4 is a whole lot of camera but the 100s is like having my old Olympus Pen S in my hand. I am 14 again and in the joy of something you had to be there to feel-but on steroids.
So, not even apples and oranges but more like apples and sex. Do you want to peel an orange or disrobe? Your choice.
🤣🥲 awesome comment and feedback 😉 I am also a Fuji person so I most DEFINITELY hear you! Take care
Love this comment....I am 15 years behind you in evolution, but gaining!
The Ricoh is just SO good for me. I think for everyday use is just the best because you can actually put in your pants pocket, so it’s almost always with me.
Wouldn’t be able to do that with the Fuji
Very true - it is super small and compact and that’s a HUGE plus in my opinion too! Cheers
Hi ! Im very interested in both and also the Sony. If we are not talking about the size, just the picture quality, can I get the same result of the Ricoh in postproduction. Thanx
The x100V can also make great video if needed ( even if that's not it's main point of course ), while the ricoh is knowed to be really bad at it.
And the screen is somewhat adjustable on the x100V too, but yeah it's price tag is pretty high.
Totally 💯
I didn’t review vidéo partially because it is a « photo camera » for everyday and also because I would not ever use an 100v for filming THAT been said, you’re absolutely right on the filming quality of these 2 cameras. I might do a follow up video for the more in-depth details like video quality, resolution and image quality, etc. The screen is also higher in resolution for fuji but I skipped this part entirely cause it wasn’t important enough to add it imo. Thanks a lot for your feedback and the additional points
Cris Photography what shutter button do you use on the X100V?
I bought it on Amazon for a few bucks 😉
I bought x100v after GRII, but i kept GRII. I still use both.
Awesome
I’m suspect in this matter as I’m waiting for my Ricoh gr3x to arrive (to be honest I was aiming to get the x100v but not available anywhere). That sayd , thankfully I got the Ricoh as I saved some money that I got accessories and still got large save.
Don’t know about at the time of the review, but now there’s some accessories to the Ricoh, from conversion lens to the leather cases. I got the viewfinder from Chinese brand for like 15€ instead of 250€ from the original for example.
Thanks! First of all: you will enjoy your Ricoh am sure 😊 it’s a very good camera. Yes the 100V became really hard to find somehow 🤷🏻🤦🏻
And yes, since the review lots of accessories become available indeed. But I find the Ricoh to be a point and shoot camera and adding accessories makes it bulkier than intended somewhat. Take care and enjoy!
@@cris_photography I know... i want to use it "naked" without acessories, but new gear needs to be babysited xD
all I really wanted to know was image quality and it was grazed over fast because of film simulations. 😭 I’m a fuji user and want to know more about the quality raw image. The sharpness of the lens in comparison to each other. The editing of the file. If you have the fuji and Ricoh image side by side and neutral tonality can you tell the difference of highlights or roll off and contrast. Things like that 😊
Thanks a lot for the feedback David and fully understood on what you’d like to see. I might do a video that compares the files of the two cameras like that.
Cheers!
sharpness of ricoh is decent. if you're looking for ultimate IQ, there are better (bigger) cameras. GR shots are sharp when viewed at 100%.
Excuse me, in versatility for ricoh you can buy lenshood, teleconverter, grip, filter holder, thumb grip, uv filter, straps, different colored rings (for whatever reason), square hood, viewfinder, flash. Im sure ive missed some to. I personally wouldent really use all those acessories for Ricoh except maybe the thumb grip or the square hood for it dope looks but you get alot in versatility for ricoh.
Yea you sure can. But… what’s the point to get all that if you buy it for the small form factor? Know what I mean? I think both are great cameras
@@cris_photography That's not my point, im pointing out about how versatile Ricoh GR3 is.
To quote you from your video "The ability to change from the base model to something more" And you pointed out that the only thing you can change on ricoh is adding flash and viewfinder, then you mention that the fuji is more versatile because you can add grip, teleconverter, lenshood etc etc "to make it do more than its supposed to do as a basic model". So i was pointing out that all acceroies you mentioned for x100v, you can add for ricoh to.
They are both at a different price point with the X100V being substantially more expensive. However, the GR3 can produce the same degree of quality as the X100V, so you are really paying a premium for the extra features on the X100V. Everyone's preference is different but I am selling my X100V to opt for the GR3x mainly because I want to scale down my load when I am travelling.
True true. I do say the fact that if you would want the Ricoh to have all the physical options of the 100v you’d have to pay more, hence the price difference. Weight and size are a big factor for street and for overall usage and transportation, so I understand your move. Thanks for sharing your thoughts
@@cris_photography Another thought though, the X100V and GR3 used to be connoisseur's items. You only buy into them specifically because you know them. Normal people who are just causal photographers never even heard of them until Tiktokers started hyping up the X100V - which is both good and bad. Good because I got a nice price for selling it. Bad because it is losing its connoisseur status. When I look at some girl holding the X100V on the street, I just have this cringe feeling and instinctively create some distance between us. Whereas the GR3 is still a connoisseur's item, you would only buy the GR3 only if you have decided to buy the GR3, not because of the hype.
@beaumontyun4045 totally 👍🏼
1:40 showed a tie :) ...but aside, the legacy feel of the dials is one thing, but the way Ricoh engineered the GUI and menu system is beyond fantastic.
True true - much easier when you first come into the system indeed 👍🏼😉
I reckon for the merely street photography, Ricoh GR 3 is much better as well as you save loads of money. In other hand if you would like to have extras, then you need to spend more! I take lots of street capture. I would like to know what is the comparison between Ricoh GR 3 and normal mobile phone (in my case is Xiaomi - Redmi Note 10 pro)?
Very true!
Although I agree Fuji aesthetically looks better, the GR does have pretty good film simulations as well as an adaptable tele converter.
True 👍🏼 I just can’t fathom why you’d put a teleconverter on such a small camera
Yes the simulations are quite nice indeed sooc
Interesting, I literally just bought the Ricoh GR III because of its size… funny thing is my Fujifilm GFX100 ii arrives later this week. What prompted me to buy the Ricoh, is to use it as a backup to my Leica M11 Monochrom, which unfortunately is having issues.
Size/weight and image quality are my primary concerns with the Ricoh. It’s just so dam small, I can pop it in my pocket and go. As small as the X100V is, it’s not pocketable in a pair of dress slacks. For me the X100V sits in an awkward space, too large to be a EDC camera, yet not pro enough to be a primary camera. It’s really down to your use case.
Interesting! The more I shoot the more I realize how different everyone really is and how everyone has different needs and experience with their gear. Thanks for sharing your thoughts!
Ricoh user here. Dropped Nikon recently, after growing tired of the mirrorless advertisements and expensive new lenses. Surely I was doubting about getting the Fuji. But when I got an external flash and learned how to deal with zone focussing, my photography skills and knowledge have improved to a surprisingly different level. The ricoh is probably harder operate, but the black and whites in post production got that "oomph". The stealth is bonus! Glad I did not fell for the hype from Fuji.
Cool 👍🏼 thanks for sharing your thoughts!
I have both cameras and I shoot with both. I’m always worried about dust getting into the Ricoh. No such problem with the X100V. My main gripe with the Ricoh. BTW, the Fuji film simulations are overhyped. The Ricoh film options are very good; especially the B&W modes are excellent.
Very true on both the dust and the simulations, gotta say I love the bw ok my GR3X! Take care
The problem of the Fuji is only one, the size.
The Ricoh is almost professional and very good camera overall, but there are plenty of very good alternatives! Fuji is a lifestyle
Absolutely 💯
When I found out the X100V was so popular that demand pushed its price above $2000, the decision to buy a GRiii was made for me. I have never owned a Fujifilm camera, and now I may never own one, because I really like the GRiii. Yes, the weatherproof and dust proof side of the X100V is very important, but is it worth $1000? Maybe only time will tell.
Thanks Mark and I hear you on the lack of availability and the price rising! It is a bummer for many indeed but am happy you like your Ricoh! Take care
The X100V is a great camera, sure, and a love it. But I like the GRIII und IIIx also, because the sharp lens, the snapfocus, the one hand operating and the small formfactor. Yes you can add a lot of gear, wide angle converter lens, NiSi filterholder - then you can get landscapes. To buy the 2 GRIII and IIIx and the X100V... 🤣
Thanks Bernd for sharing your thoughts 😉
Very interesting thread but I think the most interesting camera is the Ricoh camera which is small, very fast,- you forgot to give a point to Ricoh camera for this 😊- because it’s essentially for street photography.
Very true!
i'm going to buy a GR3 next week and then i saw this video it's make me so confuse to choose :))
😁😁 I hear y’a! Check my last video on my 8 reasons to get a Ricoh in 2024 😉 might help!
@@cris_photography just got a GR3, thank you mate, this camera is so good !
The built in flash in the Fuji is underrated
ABSOLUTELY! Great little flash and always good to have! Cheers
The flash in the GRII is underrated as well. Reason I didnt upgrade to the GRIII!
Looks for the Ricoh is designed not to be noticed. Like you mentioned you don’t want people looking at you.
There are many attachments for the Ricoh in both functional and decorative categories.
Exactly - totally agreed.
That been said, an EVF for the Ricoh costs 250$… imagine adding features to match the x100 series - would cost much more basically. It’s all about the size so keeping it stripped makes it a super stealthy camera 👍🏼 take care
GR III is the best in general! )) Because any other cameras are not so pocketalbe. And you lose the moment if your camera is not pocketalbe. Im using my Z6II for Astrophoto and Timelapse only. For any other cases im using GR III
Thank you and yes definitely a very pocketable camera! 💪🏼
I was going to buy x100v but is the x100vi due end of the year😛
Good idea! At this point I think you’re better off 😊 take care
The only reasons to go with ricoh are lower price and ninja mode. If the the extra 500 aren't a problem for you and if passing unnoticed isn't important for you the the fuji easily wins because of the extra stop, weather sealing and colors.
Totally 💯
me getting both, those are legendary cameras, once you use them both you will know what I'm talking about.
👍🏼😉
The X-trans sensor in the Fuji is for me another important difference.
Excellent point!
I don't know the X100V even if i read and see much about it..But all i can say is that the GR3 is delivering AMAZING pictures !!!! And the 5 axes stabilisation alllows us to go till 1/2 of a second very easily..Then to have "just" 2.8 is even not a problem..
For me only TWO POINTS could be a problem :
**the viewfinder...Do we need one ? On the GR3, it's so easy to see the exposition with zebras and coorect it with one hand that i don t really care..
**The Video on the GR3 is NOT great...It s good for B Roll but the AF ...euhhhhh
28 mm is fantastic to shoot city ( you can crop after)....
Bref..Maybe a great camera the fuji...Maybe TOO EXPENSIVE ? Ciaooo / JF
The mail problem is that you didn't look at what this video is aiming. this is an EVERYDAY review - not a street one! to answer your points:
amazing pictures: yes it does - so does Fuji and no, in MY opinion they are not better but there are no simulations so for everyday use (for an regular Joe) it is better for straight out of the camera images.
IBIS: yes, it is. Don't find it out of this world personally but it does make a diff (as I said...)
Aperture: I like that extra stop for bokeh purposes and for low-light. Not for everyone but it's a plus.
Viewfinder: I USE ONE - LOL. It is a MUST for me and having a hybrid OVF/EVF like no other brand is a HUGE pro. I hate feeling like am using a damn phone! I am a Leica M shooter and that tells it all.
Video: I know it's bad indeed. didn't want to include it in this "photo" camera review (I will never use either of these)
I don't find the fuji camera expensive - hell it's a few hundred bucks and if you take for example the evf on the Ricoh you'd add another 250 bucks!
You really need to take the point of view of someone who takes his camera everywhere and who is NOT a pro photographer and see which is best. If the video was about street photography for example I'd get it.
Anyhow, 2 VERY distinct beasts! Take care
The Ricoh IBIS is only 3 axis. Just in case people get confused. 5 axis IBIS is impossible to have along with internal ND filter.
You forgot to mention that Ricoh has also a converter from 28mm to 21mm ff equivalent… Also why not talking of the snap mode. Here the Fuji is just K.O…so one or 2 more points to Ricoh? I had a x100f which I sold after several month… Fuji is too bulky for my street photographies. Almost as big as an M9. After more than 2 years I still don’t regret selling the Fuji and I am still amazed by the picture quality of the Ricoh… long live the street king 😊
Nice! Thanks for sharing David
Vraiment dommage de ne pas sur que sur le Ricoh GR iii:
On peut mettre un repose pouce, on peut mettre un convertisseur grand angle, un half case. Bref, on peut aussi quelques trucs dessus.
Ok, le Fuji a des supers rendus couleurs. Mais le Ricoh fait des dng incroyables!
Hello Julien, oui c’est vrai qu’on pourrait mettre plein de chose - meme une cage! Mais la question devient: est-ce qu’on veut vraiment le faire niveau taille du boîtier? Ça rend la petite taille vraiment inutile de rajouter tous ces accessoires a MON avis. Les dng Ricoh sont géniaux - je ne les trouves pas meilleurs que les raf de Fuji donc le point irait aux deux - avec des meilleurs dnj pour Fujifilm par contre (comme tu précises). Merci pour ton feed-back!
@@cris_photography Mince j'ai écrit en anglais précédemment 🤣🤣 Euh oui, je ne lacherai mon GR3 pour rien au monde...Reviens de Munich et Amsterdam d'ou j'ai ramené des DNG fantastiques avec un petit pied tout mignon et un petit flash idoine....Fantastique capteur je dois dire !! Ciaoo / JF
im so done with big heavy cameras. im not a professional photographer, but as an enthusiast the smaller ricoh is a good upgrade from my iphone 13promax and fujixt20
I hear you!
Both are excellent cameras on their own. For me, 35mm is the dealbreaker (that's how I comfortly see), which means I'm biased to the Fuji. 28mm is... yes it's certainly useful for certain cases, but doesn't fit my shooting style in daily use. Imagine another Ricoh GR but with 35mm-equivalent lens instead. No crop mode. I think that will be awesome :D
I hear ya! 😉 I can see how that’d be a problem indeed
Take care
Very helpful comparison. Have the grii, now considering whether worth it to add 100V....is it enough of an upgrade to pay >1400 bucks for? And what about Sony RX1 r2?
Hello Curtis, thanks for your comment. My advice: wait a little bit as am sure the next generation of X100 camera is right around the corner...
Can't really speak for the Sony RX1 because I didn't try it
I think it really boils down to size (a lot) and use (if it's for professional use, for street only, etc.) those are the main criteria I'd look for in choosing between these cameras.
Take care
I have fuji xs 10, should i go with ricoh or fuji x100v? I need something for street photography. And something quick on the go
Honestly? Keep the S10 and get either a 23mm or a 27mm pancake.
If you ONLY wanna go street then Ricoh is the way to go but otherwise you’ll get a 100v that has the same sensor as the S10 and the 23mm so… why change?
I thought the Ricoh also had full simulation. Either way, great video
Thanks 🙏
Yes Ricoh does have simulations but Fuji is known for their film stock simulations that look like their films back in the day. Take care!
The thing is if you buy used, the price doesn't matter because you can sell both for like 100$ less
Very true
Which lens is sharper
Hard to tell. I can say tho that I prefer the macro quality of the Ricoh (when wise open the Fuji tends to be a tad soft)
Although I am a Fuji fan. But 1400 is too much considering you can get a sony 6600 with pancake lens with the same price and form factor. Ricoh on the other hand has all the right things for a second camera in your pocket..But that's just my take for a fixed lens camera
Sure you could see it that way. It’s also true that all the good features from their more expensive cameras are included in the x100 series making it a professional camera (even if not interchangeable lenses) and I did use it for several weddings - for which I would not have gone with a Ricoh (like ever). So yes, it’s expensive but for what you get I’ve seen worse personally. Interesting tho, thanks for sharing your views! Take care
@@cris_photography Thank you Cris for the insight... Appreciate it
The main point is, 28mm @2.8 vs 35 mm @2.0. That is for me the deal maker....
Cool 😎
Why did you list the Ricoh against versatility when it can also have all the things you listed for the X100, like filter, hood, thumb grip, Tele converter, ultra wide converter, case. Other than a shutter release button they're the same for accessories.
Because why get such a small camera if you gonna add - for example - an evf on top (250$ nonetheless)? Or add a grip? And a filter, a thumb test, etc.? For one it become SUPER cumbersome and not only the price goes up drastically but aesthetically and confort speaking - it ain’t good, hence the versatility issue compared to an X100 camera that is a bit bigger but can do those things much better, cheaper and still looking good. Anyway, that’s my personal take on it. Cheers
@@cris_photography because it's more versatile, that's the point. Without those accessories it's very small when needed and with them it's still smaller than the X100. Just seemed a bit fleeting to brush over these but go into how the fact that the X100 has these options it's therefore more versatile. Anyhow like you say it's all opinions! I've had and enjoyed both, great options 👍
To me pocketability and brilliant image quality of GR3 is the way. This is the way.
I totally understand 💯! Cheers
The images I’m seeing from the gr iii are fantastic. I’m a Fuji user, I’m strongly considering getting a Ricoh
Yes they’re great! But nothing Fuji can’t do imo. I think the biggest advantage really is the size of the camera that allows you to be more inconspicuous and discreet 👍🏼 cheers
@@cris_photography yeah, I’m going through one of those “too much time on my hands” moments; which means I start shopping for things I don’t need. 😂
I was even looking at Leica (again) knowing that A: I don’t need one, and B: I can’t afford one anyway. But yet I spend hours comparing and contrasting like I’m about to put one in my shopping cart. It’s a sickness. 😂
But it did give me a video idea, so there’s that.
Cheers
Why not get a Canon M100 plus 22mm f2 for less than half the price?
Why not get a mid-range Samsung galaxy for even less? There are so many reason why, but i just don’t understand the purpose of your question in a video comparing 2 cameras specifically
I bought the Ricoh GR3 and sold it 8 months later because of the bad focus system and the bad black and white tones. The Fuji 100V is over priced because of the hype. I’d rather go for the Fuji XE-4 because it’s small and the the tones of colour match that of the Leica monochrome.
Interesting! Thanks
How can you compare them. Two different camera's. I prefer the Ricoh gr3 and gr3x over my fuji.
I can compare them… the way I did. Wasn’t a problem for a lot of people so there. They are very different indeed but at the same time very similar in a lot of ways. Cheers
X100V has the Made in Japan printed on it, the Ricoh has it?
Not sure! Don’t have it anymore but don’t recall seeing it written anywhere
I would like to make a correction to this video
The customization/versatility is almost identical between the two
Besides the button , the Ricoh has more or less the same accessories:
Lens hood (from JJC to Squarehoo)
Grip (can find on AliBaba)
Thumb rest
Leather Half body Cover etc
Conversion lenses from Ricoh (wide angle or tele)
Colored rings etc
So you took a point unfairly for the GR as you can customize it a bit, similar to the X100v
True true. That said, if you had all that to the Ricoh (besides the additional price you will pay and the utterly cumbersome result) you will end up with a camera that basically looses all it was design for and you better off with a full-on « normal » camera at that point. I didn’t mention those cause the ate included with the X100 series and don’t add to the bulk of price. But y’a, you can even find more accessories if you wanted to - sure 👍🏼
@@cris_photography I agree that fully accessorizing a GR is against the spirit of the camera, but that was not the point of the segment, thus I wanted to make this addendum to people that they want to get a bit more out of the small GR series III +(x) if they wish for it (instead of buying another system maybe just a bit of customization is all that is needed)
But yeah the point is to have these amazing camera systems in your pocket. I still rock a OG Sony RX100 Mk1 that kind of started the HiQ pocket able mirror-less trend back in the day and it's a great little camera.
Thanks for the reply and the video!
I’ve bought the only one that was available
Ricoh?
@@cris_photography Absolutely GR3X. I’m a long time Fuji user and I had made the mistake to sold my X100F. When I’ve wanted to catch an X100V it was far too late. I’ve discovered Ricoh cameras by searching for an alternative and I’ve been quite intrigued by the GR line up that I didn’t know about. Seen a lot of videos and discovered the existence of GR community. So I’ve decide to buy the GR3X a couple of days ago.
I see! Curious to know your feedback. Did you receive and test it yet?
@@cris_photography Thank you very much for your interest but I have not yet formed a definitive opinion on this camera, despite its very high objective qualities. I am a bit of a special case. In France, I am signed with a publisher and I have released two books so far (the 3rd one is due in November). My first book, of street photography, was entirely made with the iPhone and the second one was half made with Fuji equipment (XE2, XPro2, X100s) and the iPhone. I have always integrated the iPhone in my photographic approach and this for a long time. I have exhibited a lot (including at Paris photo / photo fever in 2019) and never had any problem with my smartphone photos... That's why I chose the GR3X. The fact of not having a viewfinder is not an obstacle to my practice. Now, if we put aside the purely technical aspect of the equipment and the rendering possibilities which are not comparable and if we talk in terms of pure uses, I still don't know if the Ricoh can really help me to get rid of my iPhone shooting habits, despite the incredible technical specifications and the snapshot functionality. I love my Fuji's for their qualities that we all know and I love working with the viewfinder. That's why, as far as I'm concerned, I'm more on the Ricoh VS iPhone question. I will certainly have clearer ideas on the question in a few weeks. If there is one thing that bothers me with the Ricoh, it's the screen when shooting in sunlight.
Any dust issues?
Not so far 👍🏼
The Griii got film simulations. candy color and so on.. but okay :D
Yes totally, those are filters - not simulations. The Fuji simulations are meant to emulate the film stock Fujifilm used back in the day when shooting film, not Ricoh. That’s what I meant by that. Cheers 😉
GR III, simply because it fits in your pocket. this is a dealbreaker. no competition. if you know a camera with similar specs and size, let me know. i found none.
True true 👍🏼
Lausaaaaane !
😁 yes!
Ricoh iii no longer has built in flash. That’s a downer, I like the Ricoh so I don’t have to pack anything.
True true
Ora esiste la ricoh GR III X...con l'equivalente 40mm
Beh oramai i prezzi scendono e nuovi modelli escono - normale. Comunque ai la serie X100 costa sempre di più 🤦🏻🤦🏻
4:04 Soo... you just didnt do any image comparisons...? when comparing two cameras??
Not what I was looking at. You can literally get good images from any camera nowadays but the main point I wanted to test between the 2 was ergonomics, handling and overall features and pros/cons.
IQ is great in both and I don’t consider one better than the other (2 APSC sensors with similar megapixels and that shoot RAW files).
There’s a bunch of inaccuracies in this video….
Gonna be more specific or just throw out a useless comment? ……
It's not weather protected !
The 100v is WR at 98% if that’s the camera you’re taking about
E la Fuji x100V è arrivata a 1600 euro se la trovi....la ricoh 1099
👍🏼
I thought Ricoh does have film simulation ?
It does - but it’s not like Fuji that has actual film stock (astia, Provia, acros, etc.)
An unreliable comparison. The two cameras are entirely different concepts. If I want stealth on the street with a host of features and great image quality, it it the Ricoh every time. You won’t get natural shots on the street with the x100v
Thanks for sharing your thoughts!
This comparison is meaningless. Buy both.
Lmao - not everyone is rich lol
Comparison helpful in making rationale to buy both! 😇
Great Vs.
Still .... I hate how you all people can´t get to a conclusion and ask your viewers.
Stand still and don´t ask for approval.
Gosh.
Thanks!
It is true that there are as many options as there are people on earth. When you give a conclusion there are as many people upset as when you ask. Either way it won’t work ✌🏻🥴
Take care
All you mentioned is pretty much irrelevant if ibis not present
WAY too much importance given to IBIS - way too much. I never use IBIS on my XT3 (main camera for years) and guess what - I make my living with it and never had a problem. There are case scenarios where u do need it as a commodity but in no case I found myself needing it.
"old lady"... At least have a respect for her.
How’d that be?
The GR is a legend worldwide as a ninja street shooter. Shouldn’t be compared to vlogging cameras.
1) don’t care about « legends » - I do reviews based on MY use. And this is an « everyday use » review - not street! 2) a « vlogging » camera?? What are you talking about?? That is the most uninformed statement ever. I went out of my way to actually GET the cameras, use them, try them and tell you my opinion - you should do the same before commenting based on others opinions!
Useless review
Useless comment 🥱
never saw that much mistakes in a video..
« That many » you meant to say? For every 100 people there’s a troll - fact. Ready for another 100 good comments 😁
The looks and versatility sections were pathetic
Thanks for the feedback