Victory Star Destroyer, Review 87, Star Wars

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 26 ม.ค. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 9

  • @raymondcoventry1221
    @raymondcoventry1221 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    I appreciate the balanced take on the Venator class, so many others praise it as the best capital ship ever in Star Wars, ignoring it's many shortcomings.

    • @starshipreviews
      @starshipreviews  8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I have never understood that myself, I think a case can be made that while a good ship at the start of the war she had been surpassed by the end of the Clone wars and was no longer viable for the new empire. Glad you liked that take.

    • @russellharrell2747
      @russellharrell2747 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The venator was more of a carrier, while the Empire needed a mobile garrison that was unassailable by pirates and rabble and could stand up to the old CIS capital ships. So the Victor worked better in that role, but was still outclassed by the ISD.

  • @thestalwartinefromstalwart4126
    @thestalwartinefromstalwart4126 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Another (metaphorically) delicious slice of imperial pizza.

    • @starshipreviews
      @starshipreviews  8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Gotta love the doom triangles

  • @timjerrom7173
    @timjerrom7173 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Ok must admit the Imperial Star Destroyers are very cool and one of the best things about the lesser "Star" franchise.
    Some of us must have a cookie jar full of brownies by now, as the highlight of the show is your ramblings at the end... "of course the main title is and I'm kidding"

  • @robotmonkeys
    @robotmonkeys 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Real shame that these got memory holed with the prequels. I'm *still* mad they made ISDs atmospheric capable and *shudder* hoverable.

    • @starshipreviews
      @starshipreviews  8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Yeah I really want the Victory to come back, but in current canon they have kinda made that unlikely

  • @shanenolan5625
    @shanenolan5625 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Crap I missed this