Exactly : just look at who he s had to beat to pull this off ??? It's the main issue if have with Djokovic and to a lessor extent Nadal , laying claim as the goat ; is the lack of decent competition in the men's game since 2019; ie Djokovic barely faced a player inside the top 20 for his 2023 US & AO open wins ( Rublev semi & Tsipas final ) - first five matches were mostly third rate players well outside the top 20 With a few exceptions , this has been the case with all the big 3 now big 2 for much of the last 7 yrs or so . They can only beat who's in front of them true - but if the competition is ordinary, like this year US & AO opens - takes lots from their credibility of greatness in my opinion Wavrinka and Thiem were easily the best players outside of the big for the last 8 years ; where are all the rest ???
It's quite surprising that the Australian Open TV channel hasn't uploaded a video of this match with the score displayed in one of the corners of the screen. Having the score on display not only adds significance to each point but also serves as a useful reference point.
As great as it was he could have played better and destroyed Nadal in this match. The commentators were completely wrong. Lots of errors, bad serving and trying to finish points too early cost Stan a lot of points that would have resulted in more breaks.
I was at that match. Stan's power that day was just incredible and too much for Rafa. It's like Stan was hitting right through him. When Stan was in beast mode he was unstoppable. I've never seen anyone blow anyone off the court like Stan did that day.
This final has fond memories - my friend and I watched it on a snowy Sunday morning in Hungary as we were cooking sausages for 40 people for an Australia Day celebration. Only sad thing was we were both barracking for Rafa.
Everything about the return game at the start of the 2nd set in this match is fucking BEAUTIFUL. Breaks to love with out-of-this-world return, Nadal's panic face on the previous point, Ramos giving a warning... sigh. Such great stuff.
Fritz Vs. Nadal Wimbledon 2022 proves that just because an opponent is injured doesn't mean they can't win. I give a lot of credit to Stan for this win.
@alexanderkennedy2969 You can actually tell in the coverage. He hits the shot into the net and then he waits a few seconds before looking around and then grabbing his back. Stan could have played better and bageled his ass but he kept going for winners instead of using his power to get back into the point when he was losing it.
😂😂😂😂😂 considering that you are completely unaware of Rafa's achievements slnce perhaps u live in Mars, have u ever watched the match really? @westonmeyer3110
Roland Garros 2015 was probably better : he destroyed Federer in the quarterfinals, won a close match against Tsonga in the semis, and beat a prime version of Novak Djokovic in the final after an incredible match !
@@Divvy21 2015 was the probably the best Djokovic ever. Beating him when he just destroyed Rafa at RG for the first time and was looking to win RG for the first time ever was beyond impressive.
Agree with you .. only 1 player won vs full power healthy NOVAK DJOKOVIC on Australia open and this is wawrinka quarterfinal 2014 Australia open... NOVAK DJOKOVIC is still Australia open champion finals 10 out of the 10 ... 100%
Stan is such a wasted talent. the dude could've been amongst the greatests being a bit more serious about Tennis. he has such a touch and precision in his shots. probably the most prolific one-hander backhand of the modern era. he's a Dhead and an alcoholic but gosh i love the way he plays when he's in the zone. his serve game is actually disgusting. in a good way. all he needed was fitness and stamina to be "the 4th".
@@jiboo6850 what do u mean hes a dhead and an alchoholic he did the best he could in his career against a stack field. most would say he overperformed. randos like u on the internet think everyone is a waste of potential.
@@jiboo6850 3 slams is hardly a wasted talent. Wdym he's an alcoholic? He has a 6 pack lol and is ripped. To win 3 slams in the big 3 era, is a great achievement
This match is when I went from really liking Stan to loving him. Amazing guy overall and he completely deserved the win. I believe that even a healthy Nadal would not have been able to beat him
On a slower and higher bouncing court, maybe, a strong Nadal would beat Wawrinka. On AO 14 court, no version of Nadal would be able to beat Stan. Nadal relied on his topspin FH into his opponent backhand side but the bounce here is only medium high and Stan always bullied Nadal back with his bombing BH. The AO 14 court is perfect for Wawrinka offensive baseline game.
@@tennisradu 35/36 year old Roger Federer beat Nadal who was only 30 at the time. And he defended his title in 2018. Safe to say he didn't have that level competition in Daniil Medvedev.
Stan pretty much takes everything on the rise leaving Nadal’s monster topspin balls in vain, not an easy task, especially on the backhand wing with one hander.
By the third set, there were no grunts from Nadal. You could tell he was hanging in there. But you must admire the man, and he didn't give away the championship final.
2014 stan was to strong for nadal, but from 2017 until now nadal would beat wawrinka on that fast sourface, because nadal can since 2017 *hit the ball much earlier* special since 2018 and THAT IS THE KEYS if you want be success in the modern time. That is the main reason why federer,nadal and novak have still in the age 30+ amazing success by grandslams..
@@davidukelele7575 what match were you watching mate? Stan was destroying Nadal well before the Back Issue came into picture. Just accept it, there are days when a Lesser player can be better. These injury excuses for Nadal are getting ridiculous.
Stan's one hand backhand is the most beautiful delightful elegant stylish powerful that this game is thankful to him. If you compare Stan's single hand backhand with other single hand backhand players no one ever come close to him
Wawrinka was battering Nadal before the first signs of an injury were apparent but it’s Nadal we are talking about, he is the ultimate fighter and could have easily turned the tide of the match if no injury had occurred, despite Wawrinka playing lights out tennis at the time. It’s horrible playing an injured opponent because it completely disrupts your rhythm and it’s not easy on the mind.
...Why wouldn't ya'll have the usual mini scoreboard in this video ? (The one that's present in the bottom left of every single Tennis match) Also I personally don't like this trend some of you official channels have of cutting out the changeover footage. If it's it a "full" match then just show it all.
You didn't include the conversation b/w Wawrinka and ref, when Nada was out of the court. It would have been interesting to hear the opinion of the commentators - what they made out of the whole thing.
Why doesnt Australian Open YT Channel show us the full match, when the viewers are ready to watch, whats the big deal... ? show us everything from the crowd reaction, to the celebrities, the pre-match stuff, the entry, the hype and post match speeches and trophy presentation, Interview... TH-cam is free... comeon dont be lazy mr editor...
تأريخ وطني العريق حضارة وادي الرافدين وأول من سن القوانين بالعالم أجمع . . . 1_ تم إختراع الكتابة . 2_ تم إختراع العجلة . 3_ تم إنشاء أول دستور في العالم . 4_ تم تأسيس أول دولة مدنية في التأريخ . 5_ تم تأسيس أول نظام تعليمي في التأريخ وذلك في بابل 6_ تم أنشاء أول أسطول بحري عائم . 7_ أنشاء أول وأحدث نضام اروائي في العالم وهذا ما يجعل الجنائن المعلقه من عجائب الدنيا السبع . 8_ أول مرأة تحكم في التأريخ . 9_ أول عملة في العالم السيكلو . 10_ أول نظام صرف صحي في العالم وما زال يعمل لحد الآن في بابل . 11_ أول جيش منظم في العالم . 12_ أول طب في العالم . 13_ أول طرق برية في التاريخ . 14_ أول برج في التاريخ وهو برج بابل ذكرته التوراة . 15_ أول ملحمة بشرية في التاريخ وهي ملحمة كلكامش الخالدة . 16_ أول أديان في البشرية 17_ أول تسمية للفصول والأشهر في التأريخ . 18_ أول إمبراطورية حكمت العالم وهي الإمبراطورية الاكدية بقيادة الملك سرجون الاكدي . 19_ أول نظام إتحادي حضاري في العالم جمع سومر واشور بحضارة بابل . 20_ أول صنع من الذهب الحلي وجعلها من المعادن الثمينة . 21- تم إختراع الوقت الستيني . 22- أول إكتشاف للمجموعة الشمسية في التاريخ . 23- بلاد الرافدين أول من أستخدم سلاح الفرسان و أول من صنع المدرعات لتدمير الأسوار و البوابات . 24- أول من قاس المسافة بين الكواكب و الارض بأستخدام عمليات حسابية لم يكتشفها الأوروبيون الا بعد الف سنة. . علماً ان لكل معلومة من هذه المعلومات المذكورة لها قصة وحديث مفصل من قبل علماء الآثار منذ اكتشافها.. ولماذا لا افتخر بوطني ... وهو اول الاوطان ... . . أتمنى لكم قراءة ممتعة . . دمتم بخير.
Not a great match. Yes, of course Stan deserved to win this. His first 2 sets were brilliant...but what a sad drop in form for the last 2 sets. His 3rd Grand Slam title (US Open 2016) was, in contrast, Stan at his very best.
Nadal got beaten in this match has nothing to do with his injury. You can see that his topspin forehand could not trouble Wawrinka at all in this match. Stan has the best BH, in this match he had no problem taking the ball on the rise, and attack Nadal every time Nadal tried to hit a cross-court forehand into Stan's backhand (the usual tactic Nadal does against Federer, who struggled hitting backhand against Nadal before 2017). It's a different story on clay with higher bounce, when Stan could not deal with Nadal, but this match was on hard court.
@@魚-c3d he said the pain started before the match but got very bad at the start of the second set. Sure wawrinka deserved the victory he won, even if your opponent is injured its still a victory. Yes nadal likely have won without injury but like he says if if dont exist.
When Stan is on his game he is unbeatable. Unfortunately in his career he was rather lazy and undisciplined. He kind of won when he wanted to I guess. Reminds me of Nick Kyrgios with a better attitude and more ambition.
Is this the best you can do ? After he will retire you guys will write novels about how good he was and How he was injured everytime when got defeated.
This was a fit Rafa. I guess you could say Stan broke Rafa's back in 1 set though. Cuz every single time Rafa loses, some loser fanboy of his comes around to scream "Injury". Stan demolished Rafa here like he did to anyone on his day. Deal with it.
@@saikatkar4452 Rafa is a horrible matchup for Stan. They all came fired up against Rafa in this tournament and then Rafa comes back and win the matches. This is best of 5 and before this match, Stan hadn't even taken a set off Rafa. Rafa is clearly hampered in this match and everyone acknowledged it except for haters.
@@luilo7848we never know how rafa wud hv come back if he was healthy . However Stan destroyed him in the first set atleast fair nd square ! No sign of injury there
What a shame, Nadal! Were you really physically injured or rather did Wawrinca injure your brain with his impressive game? you are a world shame You never gave nor will you give credit to your opponents when they beat you... they are always your invented injuries
I've seen him trying his ultimate best even if he is losing. And he tries hard against a player as legendary as Federer, against whom, anyone would give up. He may still end up losing, but never gives up on a point unless he's injured. It is very easy to target someone when they're are helpless, shows a lot about people's character.
1st Grand Slam for Stan Wawrinka
QF - Djokovic
SF - Berdych
F - Nadal
Very deserved tournament
Its beyond ret@rded that the Australian Open TV channel dont include the score in the picture during these highlights
@@DeeDeeJohn17 for once in a life time you gotta listen and rely to the umpire calling the score lol
The best match of series. Nole vs Stan 2013-14-15 full 5 sets
All his slam titles were very well deserved.
Exactly : just look at who he s had to beat to pull this off ???
It's the main issue if have with Djokovic and to a lessor extent Nadal , laying claim as the goat ; is the lack of decent competition in the men's game since 2019; ie Djokovic barely faced a player inside the top 20 for his 2023 US & AO open wins ( Rublev semi & Tsipas final ) - first five matches were mostly third rate players well outside the top 20
With a few exceptions , this has been the case with all the big 3 now big 2 for much of the last 7 yrs or so . They can only beat who's in front of them true - but if the competition is ordinary, like this year US & AO opens - takes lots from their credibility of greatness in my opinion
Wavrinka and Thiem were easily the best players outside of the big for the last 8 years ; where are all the rest ???
It's quite surprising that the Australian Open TV channel hasn't uploaded a video of this match with the score displayed in one of the corners of the screen. Having the score on display not only adds significance to each point but also serves as a useful reference point.
Waw is unbeatable when in form. Best back hand in the business.
no scoreboard ??????
Literally
What a great play from Wawrinka. His backhand is so effective, powerful, and stylish. He really deserved to win this game.
As great as it was he could have played better and destroyed Nadal in this match.
The commentators were completely wrong. Lots of errors, bad serving and trying to finish points too early cost Stan a lot of points that would have resulted in more breaks.
I was at that match. Stan's power that day was just incredible and too much for Rafa. It's like Stan was hitting right through him. When Stan was in beast mode he was unstoppable. I've never seen anyone blow anyone off the court like Stan did that day.
Gran comentario George 🤝. Wawrinka estuvo en modo STANIMAL 👿. Además tiene el mejor REVÉS del mundo 🌍.
He crushed Novak in every slam he won.
Ma ti sei accorto che Nadal aveva mal di schiena e non si muoveva più di un metro a sinistra o a destra? Dove sta il merito di wawrinka?
George Beier
GeorgeBeier, solo tu e wawrinka non vi siete accorti che Nadal non era come al solito, altrimenti lo avrebbe stracciato come sempre
This final has fond memories - my friend and I watched it on a snowy Sunday morning in Hungary as we were cooking sausages for 40 people for an Australia Day celebration. Only sad thing was we were both barracking for Rafa.
Funny how nothing is mentioned about Nadal's back injury. He was obviously laboring towards the end of the match.
@@Golf05 obviously just like in every big match he loses gtfoh
@@popovicaleksandar98 Yeah, he loses every big match. gtfoh
He said every big match he loses. He lost quite a few though @@Golf05
@@popovicaleksandar98 ignorant, also that's not a way to refute so nice auto concession
That Backhand!! Crushing the short rally at 8:35..
Everything about the return game at the start of the 2nd set in this match is fucking BEAUTIFUL. Breaks to love with out-of-this-world return, Nadal's panic face on the previous point, Ramos giving a warning... sigh. Such great stuff.
Panic face? Timestamp?
Fritz Vs. Nadal Wimbledon 2022 proves that just because an opponent is injured doesn't mean they can't win. I give a lot of credit to Stan for this win.
@alexanderkennedy2969
You can actually tell in the coverage. He hits the shot into the net and then he waits a few seconds before looking around and then grabbing his back.
Stan could have played better and bageled his ass but he kept going for winners instead of using his power to get back into the point when he was losing it.
@alexanderkennedy2969
Stan should have beat Nadal in the RG 2017 final too.
@@westonmeyer3110 the semi-final before took every inch of energy from him. Not saying he would have defeated Rafa but could have had better chance
😂😂😂😂😂 considering that you are completely unaware of Rafa's achievements slnce perhaps u live in Mars, have u ever watched the match really? @westonmeyer3110
very good showing from Stan. this + 2015 RG are his best victories.
Probably the best tournament of stan's career, 2014 AO, Djokovic and Nadal on his way to title
Roland Garros 2015 was probably better : he destroyed Federer in the quarterfinals, won a close match against Tsonga in the semis, and beat a prime version of Novak Djokovic in the final after an incredible match !
@@flaviencrozier beating the australian open god djokovic in 5 sets while he was healthy and in form definitely adds a lot of value to this title
@@Divvy21
2015 was the probably the best Djokovic ever. Beating him when he just destroyed Rafa at RG for the first time and was looking to win RG for the first time ever was beyond impressive.
Agree with you .. only 1 player won vs full power healthy NOVAK DJOKOVIC on Australia open and this is wawrinka quarterfinal 2014 Australia open... NOVAK DJOKOVIC is still Australia open champion finals 10 out of the 10 ... 100%
the start of stan's not too shabby year that ended with a davis cup title
Stan is such a wasted talent. the dude could've been amongst the greatests being a bit more serious about Tennis. he has such a touch and precision in his shots. probably the most prolific one-hander backhand of the modern era. he's a Dhead and an alcoholic but gosh i love the way he plays when he's in the zone. his serve game is actually disgusting. in a good way. all he needed was fitness and stamina to be "the 4th".
@@jiboo6850 what do u mean hes a dhead and an alchoholic he did the best he could in his career against a stack field. most would say he overperformed. randos like u on the internet think everyone is a waste of potential.
@@jiboo6850 3 slams is hardly a wasted talent. Wdym he's an alcoholic? He has a 6 pack lol and is ripped. To win 3 slams in the big 3 era, is a great achievement
@@Divvy21 you my dude are ignorant af about him . 😑
@@jiboo6850 Is he really an alcoholic?
Interesting to watch this final. I have never seen it before. I wish they would have included the trophy presentation and speeches.
th-cam.com/video/tmtQLiLMSF4/w-d-xo.html there you go ;)
This match is when I went from really liking Stan to loving him. Amazing guy overall and he completely deserved the win. I believe that even a healthy Nadal would not have been able to beat him
On a slower and higher bouncing court, maybe, a strong Nadal would beat Wawrinka. On AO 14 court, no version of Nadal would be able to beat Stan. Nadal relied on his topspin FH into his opponent backhand side but the bounce here is only medium high and Stan always bullied Nadal back with his bombing BH. The AO 14 court is perfect for Wawrinka offensive baseline game.
Poor Rafa, thank god he got over the AO curse in 2022 🏆
Riiight. No Swiss or Serbian in the final.
He beat the Swiss in 2009 and was 2 games away from beating the Serbian in 2012 though...
@@tennisradu 35/36 year old Roger Federer beat Nadal who was only 30 at the time. And he defended his title in 2018. Safe to say he didn't have that level competition in Daniil Medvedev.
What's your point? Did you feel the need to mention Federer nowadays or?
@@tennisradu Because Stan didn't do it in 2017 now did he?
Stan the Man - Origins
I say this is Part 1, Origins was 2013. 😛
Stan pretty much takes everything on the rise leaving Nadal’s monster topspin balls in vain, not an easy task, especially on the backhand wing with one hander.
Stan's backhand is thing of beauty. He's got major power in his strokes. Rafa didn't seem to be into this match at all.
You might have forgotten about his back injury mid match. The fact he kept going is still impressive
By the third set, there were no grunts from Nadal. You could tell he was hanging in there. But you must admire the man, and he didn't give away the championship final.
Wawrinka man with some powerful and deep single handed backhand.... nice to see him get his share of slams...
I love Nadal but Wawrinka had some very good tennis those years to come
Finally!! Been wanting to see this match forever. Thx Guys
Good old days, 10 yrs back.. For me Tennis will never be the same again as the time of Big 3 were on top...
2014 stan was to strong for nadal, but from 2017 until now nadal would beat wawrinka on that fast sourface, because nadal can since 2017 *hit the ball much earlier* special since 2018 and THAT IS THE KEYS if you want be success in the modern time. That is the main reason why federer,nadal and novak have still in the age 30+ amazing success by grandslams..
Nadal was injured, there was no match, he could barely serve. Because of this, Wawrinka did not play well either.
@@davidukelele7575 Nadal got injured in the second set, Wawrinka was demolishing him a set and a break up
@@davidukelele7575 what match were you watching mate? Stan was destroying Nadal well before the Back Issue came into picture. Just accept it, there are days when a Lesser player can be better. These injury excuses for Nadal are getting ridiculous.
Stan's one hand backhand is the most beautiful delightful elegant stylish powerful that this game is thankful to him. If you compare Stan's single hand backhand with other single hand backhand players no one ever come close to him
Stan, Roddick, dol potro, Murray, all are great player but because of the three beast ( rafa,Roger and nole ) they never get what they deserve .....
Such a great victory!
Wawrinka was battering Nadal before the first signs of an injury were apparent but it’s Nadal we are talking about, he is the ultimate fighter and could have easily turned the tide of the match if no injury had occurred, despite Wawrinka playing lights out tennis at the time. It’s horrible playing an injured opponent because it completely disrupts your rhythm and it’s not easy on the mind.
Nadal exaggerated it because he knew he would lose regardless
this is unwatchable if you're skimming through, never showing the score
The day Nadal through in the towel. The Stanimal ❤️
💪🏻💪🏻💪🏻😁🎾
So kind of Wawrinka to gift Nadal with one set 😅
He was completely confused. Nadal would play just enough to win some points and then double fault twice in a row.
...Why wouldn't ya'll have the usual mini scoreboard in this video ? (The one that's present in the bottom left of every single Tennis match)
Also I personally don't like this trend some of you official channels have of cutting out the changeover footage. If it's it a "full" match then just show it all.
Wawrinka was bludgeoning the ball that day. Rafa never had a chance.
Gotta love Stan
You didn't include the conversation b/w Wawrinka and ref, when Nada was out of the court. It would have been interesting to hear the opinion of the commentators - what they made out of the whole thing.
Why doesnt Australian Open YT Channel show us the full match, when the viewers are ready to watch, whats the big deal... ? show us everything from the crowd reaction, to the celebrities, the pre-match stuff, the entry, the hype and post match speeches and trophy presentation, Interview... TH-cam is free... comeon dont be lazy mr editor...
01:23:23 learn that backhand
Rafa how beautifully he congratulates Stan, true sportsman
from 2014-2022the court was really fast by the australin open AND FROM 2008-2013 and 2020 was it extrem slow
You are the one who says Rafa has no chance to win Melbourne,right 😂
@@Laland_1196 stuevw said that nadal has no chance and i said to stuevw, that nadal has a big chance to win the Australian open...go ask him
@@travisbickle5279 ok bickle
It was not really fast, 2014-2015 were just average. The real speed started in 2016, but the points were even shorter in 2017.
except 2009. that year, the court was extremely fast.
People here making out like Nadal wasn't completely injured before starting
That version of Wawrinka would beat anyone.
Only beat injured nadal else where he could not beat him.
When Stan is in top form no one can beat him !
He should have won more than 10 slam
Rafa you made us happy finally😭❤❤❤
Only now? Wauw poor guy needs to do everything to keep you happy huh.
@@dudenotsoperfect9366 I think he means winning that second AO title.
@@ashleythomas4112 yeah sherlock i know
how are they gonna cut out the argument had with the umpire? So much of the context of the second set is lost without it
where is the score board
please include the score in future replays
The revenge of Switzerland 🇨🇭
Nadal won Federer 3 sets in SF • and wairinka revenge 💪
Good to see that Rafa also likes Wawrinka
2015 and 2019 now
wow that was great stan!
sad to see what happened to nadal
Where is scoreboard?
In Australia. Like the court.
what might they have said at the net after the match? did wawrinka thank nadal that he went on playing the final?
تأريخ وطني العريق حضارة وادي الرافدين وأول من سن القوانين بالعالم أجمع .
.
.
1_ تم إختراع الكتابة .
2_ تم إختراع العجلة .
3_ تم إنشاء أول دستور في العالم .
4_ تم تأسيس أول دولة مدنية في التأريخ .
5_ تم تأسيس أول نظام تعليمي في التأريخ وذلك في بابل
6_ تم أنشاء أول أسطول بحري عائم .
7_ أنشاء أول وأحدث نضام اروائي في العالم وهذا ما يجعل الجنائن المعلقه من عجائب الدنيا السبع .
8_ أول مرأة تحكم في التأريخ .
9_ أول عملة في العالم السيكلو .
10_ أول نظام صرف صحي في العالم وما زال يعمل لحد الآن في بابل .
11_ أول جيش منظم في العالم .
12_ أول طب في العالم .
13_ أول طرق برية في التاريخ .
14_ أول برج في التاريخ وهو برج بابل ذكرته التوراة .
15_ أول ملحمة بشرية في التاريخ وهي ملحمة كلكامش الخالدة .
16_ أول أديان في البشرية
17_ أول تسمية للفصول والأشهر في التأريخ .
18_ أول إمبراطورية حكمت العالم وهي الإمبراطورية الاكدية بقيادة الملك سرجون الاكدي .
19_ أول نظام إتحادي حضاري في العالم جمع سومر واشور بحضارة بابل .
20_ أول صنع من الذهب الحلي وجعلها من المعادن الثمينة .
21- تم إختراع الوقت الستيني .
22- أول إكتشاف للمجموعة الشمسية في التاريخ .
23- بلاد الرافدين أول من أستخدم سلاح الفرسان و أول من صنع المدرعات لتدمير الأسوار و البوابات .
24- أول من قاس المسافة بين الكواكب و الارض بأستخدام عمليات حسابية لم يكتشفها الأوروبيون الا بعد الف سنة.
.
علماً ان لكل معلومة من هذه المعلومات المذكورة لها قصة وحديث مفصل من قبل علماء الآثار منذ اكتشافها..
ولماذا لا افتخر بوطني ... وهو اول الاوطان ...
.
.
أتمنى لكم قراءة ممتعة .
.
دمتم بخير.
Interesante...
@@VictorRodriguez-ot3wq شنوو
After a while, Nadal had a continued concerned look on his face.
Wawrinka played both the best and worst sets of his life in this match.
At least!
Rafa , what a fighter!
Yo Australian open, wtf is the score?
Not a great match. Yes, of course Stan deserved to win this. His first 2 sets were brilliant...but what a sad drop in form for the last 2 sets. His 3rd Grand Slam title (US Open 2016) was, in contrast, Stan at his very best.
Nadal got beaten in this match has nothing to do with his injury.
You can see that his topspin forehand could not trouble Wawrinka at all in this match. Stan has the best BH, in this match he had no problem taking the ball on the rise, and attack Nadal every time Nadal tried to hit a cross-court forehand into Stan's backhand (the usual tactic Nadal does against Federer, who struggled hitting backhand against Nadal before 2017). It's a different story on clay with higher bounce, when Stan could not deal with Nadal, but this match was on hard court.
Honestly I have never seen a healthy Nadal lose. Except when Djokovic is on the other side of the net.
Stan beets Djokovic in semis ..That is the match....Supper rallys and shows the power of Stan...
@@countrymu6I know mate i was taking the piss out of nadal and his fans
A shame stan wasnt as consistent like the big 3 he could haven been number 1 if played at a high level not this hot cold stuff
Raf a for back spasms right before the match. To that point he was 12-0 vs Stan.
He clearly stated that the pain started in the 3rd set. Which means wawrinka dominated him in the first two sets and deserved victory.
Nope
@@魚-c3d LOL you all didn't watch the video. he called the medic in the 2nd set. but anyway... Stan still played better.
@@魚-c3d he said the pain started before the match but got very bad at the start of the second set. Sure wawrinka deserved the victory he won, even if your opponent is injured its still a victory. Yes nadal likely have won without injury but like he says if if dont exist.
No, he hurt his back at 45:15, before that point he was quite healthy and playing normally...Stan dominated him 6-3 2-0 up to that point.
Stan took 1 from Rafa but also took 1 from Nole.
He took like 3 slams from Novak, 2014 AO, 2015 FO & USO 2016
When Stan is on his game he is unbeatable.
Unfortunately in his career he was rather lazy and undisciplined.
He kind of won when he wanted to I guess. Reminds me of Nick Kyrgios with a better attitude and more ambition.
These truncated repeats just rush it all, I'd rather have all the hours it took.
Who is comentating?
So my dear claydal LOVERS, what yo can said about this match, that claydal lost against a better player than him? Or he lost because "some injurie"?
2Pac Loyal To The Game Ft. 50 Cent, Lloyd Banks & Young Buck
The Notorious B.I.G. Living In Pain Ft. 2Pac, Mary J. Blige & Nas
22:50
most dumbest spoiler in thumbnail i have ever seen
Why Nadel was playing like this in the final, was there a back story, someone?
he was injured
why has only Federer solved the Wawrinka puzzle out of the big 3?
Federer and Nadal had no problem against Stan. Federer 23-3, Nadal 19-3 against Stan. It's only Djokovic who's having trouble against Stan.
@@미켈란젤리 Đoković is 20-6 against Wawrinka
@@MrDzo94 I was talking about GS matches
Watch more tennis and less Fed fanboying.
i love fed but let's not forget rg 2015 where he lost to stan in straight sets
أين النتيجة يلعبون ولا نعرف من الفاىز ومن الخاسر
Sad that Rafa Got Injured..
Tennis Needed Stan To Break Through giving Hope to Others..
He was 28 Years Old and 10 Months.. Old..
Hell naw!
Is this the best you can do ? After he will retire you guys will write novels about how good he was and How he was injured everytime when got defeated.
Why are points now shown lmao
بعدما صرع علي بن ابي طالب (ع) عمرو بن عبد ود قال النبي محمد (ص)
"ضربة علي في الخندق افضل من عبادة الثقلين "
20:27 That's why Rafa's routine involves wiping his sweat from every part of his face every serve. My dude leaks a lot lol.
Wawrinka would have no chance against fit rafa
This was a fit Rafa. I guess you could say Stan broke Rafa's back in 1 set though. Cuz every single time Rafa loses, some loser fanboy of his comes around to scream "Injury". Stan demolished Rafa here like he did to anyone on his day. Deal with it.
@@saikatkar4452 Rafa is a horrible matchup for Stan. They all came fired up against Rafa in this tournament and then Rafa comes back and win the matches. This is best of 5 and before this match, Stan hadn't even taken a set off Rafa. Rafa is clearly hampered in this match and everyone acknowledged it except for haters.
@@luilo7848we never know how rafa wud hv come back if he was healthy . However Stan destroyed him in the first set atleast fair nd square ! No sign of injury there
on clay, true.
Rafa injured in the warm up. Couldn't and move properly. Very lucky day for Stan who 0-8 against Rafa.
What a shame, Nadal! Were you really physically injured or rather did Wawrinca injure your brain with his impressive game?
you are a world shame
You never gave nor will you give credit to your opponents when they beat you... they are always your invented injuries
AO triumph was a sign from the heavens in a virus affected world 🌍👍❤️😎
18:14
Wawrinka played one of his best matches ever and Nadal one of his worst.
And it is amazing for Nadal having been so successful with such a poor serve
Rafa was 28 then? Looked much older. Hasn't changed till today though.
Lost hair a little bit
Tennis player tend to age pretty quick due to constant sun exposure starting from 4-5 years old. Not sure all of them use sunscreen neither
27 he was.
Rafa always looked old
Rafa born 1986 as was I In 2014 yes he was 28
قوية
Shoot out your fantasy factory
How rafa won that 3 set without his serve? The greatest competitor ever
Rafa is injured again...
as always when he is losing hahaa
he was not injured then
I've seen him trying his ultimate best even if he is losing. And he tries hard against a player as legendary as Federer, against whom, anyone would give up. He may still end up losing, but never gives up on a point unless he's injured.
It is very easy to target someone when they're are helpless, shows a lot about people's character.
@@akhileshiyer296 no when someone outplayed him
@@paulotorres5022 losing his 22nd GS and 14th RG? Yeah definitely lost that one
Вавринка пахарь
Toob goodv match.Sleep watch..
Greatest forehand ever against greatest backhand ever?
For a Nadal's fan, I think is the worst defeat of his career. So much frustration.
အသစ်ဆုံးပထမ
Si Nadal llega a estar bien le gana en 3 sets
*
Why we wanna watch a match with an injured opponent?
Because we can
Lol here goes Rafa faking again
@@danielgeorgetheoneandonly Why would he play worse and stop running for balls if he wasn’t injured
@@wave1468 idk about injury but he was getting clobbered well before any signs.
@@kakashihatake1029 He called the trainer, and has spoken about it many times as well as the fact he missed Indian wells
👍