Hi - great vid - I've looked at this for many years on and off - if the circles are moving through our view then the maths will fit, if the maths doesn't fit, the results won't come and it won't fit - the markets are building geometric shapes all the time. Sometimes its just a simple geometrical ratio of a prior move i.e. the Jan 2022 top in the SP500 topped out 1 point!, 1 point of a perfect 1.902 (diagonal of the golden triangle) of the swing Jan 2016 to Feb 2020 x 1.902 - there was another geometrical calc using the Jan'16 low to Jan'18 high x 2.828 = Jan'22 high within a couple of points. 2.828 is an expansion of the harmonics of the SQUARE and the Mar 2020 crash low fell 35.41% (35.4 is an INTERNAL (less than 1) harmonic of the SQUARE) - also and this is big, 35.4% in the direct INVERSE of 2.828, so the market hits its inverse in Feb'20 before it had reached its completion of its expanding geo shape - Since Jan'22 high you're looking for 44.7% internal ratio hits as 44.7 is an internal ratio of Sq root5 and the sq root5 makes up part of the golden rectangle - the INVERSE of the golden rectangle 1.902 is 52.6% - Keep up the great work, have subscribed and look forward to your videos in future
Its fascinating to me how price will respect the geometry too. I find that the more touches you have on the geometry the better the result. I also found circle and spiral edges when aligned with multiple touches also give good pivots. The more I make charts the more the connections appear. Thanks for the sub and kind words.
@@GannJourneyman Yeah there's no doubt Geometry is in there, if you look at the SP500 2007-09 crash - it fell 57.69% - geometric perfection was at 57.7%, this is also TAN30 of the triangle, 57.7% is a harmonic of the CUBE. Then you need to look to the sky for the TIMINGS which came in bang to the day 6th March 2009 - My big bold prediction is the USA markets will top out in 2034 followed by a bear market of significance (not yet worked out the exact time dates, will do that closer to 2034) - The big turns of the market don't happen out of the blue, its all predictable
CAn you point to the source book/pdf etc that you are pulling this info from? I'm super intrigued. Does Jenkins have an alternate definition for AB=CD patterns? My understanding of them is that they are two equal legs in the same direction on the chart, with BC being the pullback in the opposite direction. Just looking at your chart, I see a clear "traditional" ABCD, so my first thought as to where your hang up on F was, was the discrepency in where you marked C and D. But I assume you have an understanding of that as well, so I'm curious what this guy's methods for labeling and then finding these distances is. Excellent topic and video, man. Thanks so much!
Thanks Nick! 🙏 This was pulled from Secret Science of the Stock Market, Chapter 5, Circles. Jenkins uses the AB=CD in terms of the circle and not the typical ABCD harmonics. The measurements of the circles derives the SqRt of 2,3,5 which is then used in other legs of the move as a measurement tool all the while the circle can also be used as a time tool.
Hi i used to apply this but Entire future geometry based on price scale of AB, how to select price to bar ratio. What i used to do is if price riseAB is 30$ and time taken is 20 days then i use to keep price to bar ratio of 30/20 = 1.5.. Is it right way?
Great question. I draw the first circle. Set center circle at high or low, and set circle edge to the swing leg. Once set adjust scale and look for multiple touches on the circle. From there, lock the price ratio and then continue to build the chart. I usually look for the most pronounced impulse leg (bull or bear) and begin the build from there. I hope this helps :)
bro u r simple crazy researcher🤗🤗🤗
This is interesting, well done with that ABCD 💯
My man👊❤️🐧
Hi - great vid - I've looked at this for many years on and off - if the circles are moving through our view then the maths will fit, if the maths doesn't fit, the results won't come and it won't fit - the markets are building geometric shapes all the time. Sometimes its just a simple geometrical ratio of a prior move i.e. the Jan 2022 top in the SP500 topped out 1 point!, 1 point of a perfect 1.902 (diagonal of the golden triangle) of the swing Jan 2016 to Feb 2020 x 1.902 - there was another geometrical calc using the Jan'16 low to Jan'18 high x 2.828 = Jan'22 high within a couple of points. 2.828 is an expansion of the harmonics of the SQUARE and the Mar 2020 crash low fell 35.41% (35.4 is an INTERNAL (less than 1) harmonic of the SQUARE) - also and this is big, 35.4% in the direct INVERSE of 2.828, so the market hits its inverse in Feb'20 before it had reached its completion of its expanding geo shape - Since Jan'22 high you're looking for 44.7% internal ratio hits as 44.7 is an internal ratio of Sq root5 and the sq root5 makes up part of the golden rectangle - the INVERSE of the golden rectangle 1.902 is 52.6% - Keep up the great work, have subscribed and look forward to your videos in future
Its fascinating to me how price will respect the geometry too. I find that the more touches you have on the geometry the better the result. I also found circle and spiral edges when aligned with multiple touches also give good pivots. The more I make charts the more the connections appear. Thanks for the sub and kind words.
@@GannJourneyman Yeah there's no doubt Geometry is in there, if you look at the SP500 2007-09 crash - it fell 57.69% - geometric perfection was at 57.7%, this is also TAN30 of the triangle, 57.7% is a harmonic of the CUBE. Then you need to look to the sky for the TIMINGS which came in bang to the day 6th March 2009 - My big bold prediction is the USA markets will top out in 2034 followed by a bear market of significance (not yet worked out the exact time dates, will do that closer to 2034) - The big turns of the market don't happen out of the blue, its all predictable
@@TheTinPotTrader You've got a beautiful mind. 💪
he is playing with the graphs
Thanks for sharing!!! 💯💯💯
Amazing application of tradingview tools. Wondering how to draw and measure radius and circle
CAn you point to the source book/pdf etc that you are pulling this info from? I'm super intrigued. Does Jenkins have an alternate definition for AB=CD patterns? My understanding of them is that they are two equal legs in the same direction on the chart, with BC being the pullback in the opposite direction. Just looking at your chart, I see a clear "traditional" ABCD, so my first thought as to where your hang up on F was, was the discrepency in where you marked C and D. But I assume you have an understanding of that as well, so I'm curious what this guy's methods for labeling and then finding these distances is. Excellent topic and video, man. Thanks so much!
Thanks Nick! 🙏 This was pulled from Secret Science of the Stock Market, Chapter 5, Circles. Jenkins uses the AB=CD in terms of the circle and not the typical ABCD harmonics. The measurements of the circles derives the SqRt of 2,3,5 which is then used in other legs of the move as a measurement tool all the while the circle can also be used as a time tool.
@@GannJourneyman I love this concept. I'll be hunting down this book for sure. Looking forward to more videos on the topic, and thanks again!
Thank you sir! My pleasure. 😊
Hi i used to apply this but Entire future geometry based on price scale of AB, how to select price to bar ratio. What i used to do is if price riseAB is 30$ and time taken is 20 days then i use to keep price to bar ratio of 30/20 = 1.5.. Is it right way?
Great question.
I draw the first circle. Set center circle at high or low, and set circle edge to the swing leg. Once set adjust scale and look for multiple touches on the circle. From there, lock the price ratio and then continue to build the chart. I usually look for the most pronounced impulse leg (bull or bear) and begin the build from there. I hope this helps :)
Please make basic video to how to draw Circle using High to Low as diameter and/or radius.
u will make circled on the behalf of already made price movement but what about what is about to happen☺☺☺
cant you see that F already fulfilled? it was just off by a bit and then it kept going after a pullback