Thanks once again for Watching. We love to read your comments. It means a lot to us. Please the Word : " Germany" in the Video was Misspelled. The real word is JŌMON. Not Germany. We tried correcting it, but it ended up still repeating the same words. Remain blessed.
Humans are believed to have migrated to the American continent from Asia during the last Ice Age, around 15,000 to 20,000 years ago. They crossed a land bridge known as Beringia, which connected present-day Siberia in Asia to Alaska in North America. This migration occurred in several waves, with groups of hunter-gatherers following herds of large game animals. Over thousands of years, these early populations spread throughout North and South America, adapting to various environments and developing diverse cultures.
The migration of humans from Asia to the Americas is a significant event in human history, often referred to in the context of the "Peopling of the Americas." Here are some key points to consider: 1. **Beringia Land Bridge**: During the last Ice Age, sea levels were much lower due to large amounts of water being locked in ice sheets. This exposed a land bridge called Beringia, which connected Asia and North America. It is hypothesized that this land bridge was a migration route for early humans. 2. **Timing of Migration**: While estimates suggest that the first migrations occurred between 15,000 and 20,000 years ago, some evidence points to even earlier migrations. Archaeological sites, like those at Monte Verde in Chile, suggest that humans may have been in South America as early as 14,500 years ago. 3. **Cultural Diversity**: As these early populations spread across the Americas, they adapted to various environments, leading to the development of diverse cultures. Some groups became nomadic hunter-gatherers, while others settled and developed agriculture. 4. **Languages and Groups**: Over time, these early populations evolved into numerous distinct groups with different languages, customs, and social structures. By the time Europeans arrived in the late 15th century, there were hundreds of distinct Indigenous cultures throughout North and South America. 5. **Genetic Studies**: Recent genetic research has provided insights into the migration patterns and ancestry of Indigenous peoples in the Americas. It has shown connections between Indigenous populations in the Americas and various groups in Siberia, supporting the theory of a single migration event followed by subsequent waves. 6. **Alternative Theories**: While the Beringia land bridge is the most widely accepted theory, there are other hypotheses, such as coastal migration routes along the Pacific coast or even migration through the Atlantic. However, these theories are less supported by archaeological evidence. 7. **Impact of European Contact**: The arrival of Europeans in the 15th century had a profound impact on Indigenous populations, leading to significant demographic, cultural, and social changes due to colonization, disease, and displacement. The history of human migration to the Americas is complex and continues to be an area of active research, with new discoveries constantly reshaping our understanding of the past. Yes, the presence of humans in the Americas as early as 14,500 years ago can be seen as contradicting a literal interpretation of the Noah story in the Bible.
Thanks for this beautiful insight. We have also made a video on the origins of the indigenous peoples of America according to the Bible. But we haven't really take a deep dive on this as regards to DNA and Genetic Origin. Your writeup is very well appreciated.
During the time just before European contact with the Americas (around the late 15th century), the population of Europe is estimated to have been between 60 million to 80 million people. Comparing the two: - **Indigenous Population of the Americas**: Estimated between 50 million to 100 million. - **Population of Europe**: Estimated between 60 million to 80 million. This means that, at that time, the population of the Americas was comparable to, and in some estimates, possibly greater than, the population of Europe. However, it’s important to note that the population estimates for both regions have a significant margin of uncertainty due to limited data and varying methodologies used in historical demographic studies.
True story- almost 60 years ago, my grandma was a very religious, farmer in a little village in Romania. I asked her what was written in the end of the Bible. Her answer was “ the yellow people will rule the world “ , nothing else. Her answer was the truth for me, never doubt it till now. I never investigated, I just wished good will to yellow people all my life, because she was smiling hopefully when she was given me the answer.
Other than producing the terrible leader of history like Genghis Khan, Yellow skin might also produce the Anti-Christ of the End times. Jesus is coming back and he is brown skin from Middle East Arabia, not Yellow skin of East Asia.
I was a child then, didn’t know much about the civilizations… later I supposed to be the people in the Far East… for 40 years I am living in the Middle East , I’m aware of the predictions .. I need to add, my grandmother was not educated or traveled… I don’t know from where she came up with that answer.. but she had a lot of stories about things happening when people were different.
There are stories from old cultures past down to new cultures that one time some Chinese movement back 3 or 4 thousand years ago, left China, to form their own country. This group of people developed their own sword fighting skills. China sent many armies over and over again to try to defeat them, but couldn't. So, today, 21st century, Japan is now their own country! DNA would differently show where they came from 3 or 4 thousand years ago... I was told this story by old wise men 54 years ago, in China town, California...
Except for the Bible part, the information is quite accurate. All the three groups also know it is true, but because of their pride, national and political interest they will have to dispute it.
Mongolian tribes and Manchurian have large populations than Korean and Japanese. Korean and Japanese people are unique under eagle empires. That's why Korean and Japanese feel supertthan people of mainland China and Southeast Asia.
BS. Most Korean and Japanese cultures are adopted from Chinese culture; in this case, they couldn't be superior to the Chinese, just like all countries adopting Western culture couldn't be superior to the Westerners. Use your logic. You must be an Indian to have come up with such an idiotic assumption.
East Asian Ancestry has been ignored by the general public, but people in the know that they descended from ancient Central Asian peoples. So, where did Caucasians come from. Caucasians as we know them came from some small population in what is now known as Turkiye, but where from before that? Why does the trail go cold before that? They didn't always exist. East Asians as we know them now didn't always exist. So what existed before that? We didn't suddenly go from Africans to as we are now. There must be a transition, but where is that in the archaeological record? There needs to be a documentary taking us from ancient Africa to now in one complete sweep.
Remember To Be GoodTrueKind. @1:27 is misLeading, as it is Known from The Holy Semitic Steles of Kaifeng esp. 《重建清真寺記》 that 阿耽←אָדָם (Adam) himself Descends from several Generations downward from The Archancestor 盤古 . Even if 雅弗←יֶפֶת (Japheth) 's descendants migrated back to the Pre-Existing Ancestral Homeland, they would simply be assimilating (i.e. Ascending) back to The Original Civilization 中國.
@@Biblestoriesunveiled-q1t , How come as per The Bell Curve Report indicates, the orientalists seem to gather more IQ rating than their ancestors in Africa? Or even the peoples in-between Africa and The Far East??
@@Biblestoriesunveiled-q1t Well, Jews weren't in the Far East to witness it. But if you investigate peculiarity of Far Eastern geology you'll find out that, unlike in all other regions of the World, stones there are so called "pre-hystoric", which means not affected neither by glacier, nor flood.
@@Biblestoriesunveiled-q1t theoretically, Hinduism and its precursor traditions existed long before the time traditionally associated with Noah and the Great Flood, as described in the Bible. The timeline often cited for the Biblical Flood is based on interpretations of genealogies and narratives in the Hebrew Bible, placing it around 2300-2500 BCE, although these dates can vary widely depending on different religious and scholarly interpretations. In contrast, the roots of Hinduism can be traced back to the Indus Valley Civilization (approximately 2500-1900 BCE) and the subsequent development of the Vedic texts (around 1500 BCE). This suggests that certain aspects of Hindu beliefs and practices were already in existence before the events described in the Noah narrative. And that suggest that at least India was not flooded. That also suggests Himalaya mountains could be dry all time of the flood just because it is 3700 meters higher than Ararat. That is way above what bible says about water depths: 15 cubits or 6.7 meters. But somehow Israeli mountains were covered.
@@MolDo57The Great Flood is a World wide event, even the promised set by Rainbow can be see World wide. Hindu must repent of your sins and believe, the Unbelievers in the End times will be most unfortunate.
The migration of humans from Asia to the Americas is a significant event in human history, often referred to in the context of the "Peopling of the Americas." Here are some key points to consider: 1. **Beringia Land Bridge**: During the last Ice Age, sea levels were much lower due to large amounts of water being locked in ice sheets. This exposed a land bridge called Beringia, which connected Asia and North America. It is hypothesized that this land bridge was a migration route for early humans. 2. **Timing of Migration**: While estimates suggest that the first migrations occurred between 15,000 and 20,000 years ago, some evidence points to even earlier migrations. Archaeological sites, like those at Monte Verde in Chile, suggest that humans may have been in South America as early as 14,500 years ago. 3. **Cultural Diversity**: As these early populations spread across the Americas, they adapted to various environments, leading to the development of diverse cultures. Some groups became nomadic hunter-gatherers, while others settled and developed agriculture. 4. **Languages and Groups**: Over time, these early populations evolved into numerous distinct groups with different languages, customs, and social structures. By the time Europeans arrived in the late 15th century, there were hundreds of distinct Indigenous cultures throughout North and South America. 5. **Genetic Studies**: Recent genetic research has provided insights into the migration patterns and ancestry of Indigenous peoples in the Americas. It has shown connections between Indigenous populations in the Americas and various groups in Siberia, supporting the theory of a single migration event followed by subsequent waves. 6. **Alternative Theories**: While the Beringia land bridge is the most widely accepted theory, there are other hypotheses, such as coastal migration routes along the Pacific coast or even migration through the Atlantic. However, these theories are less supported by archaeological evidence. 7. **Impact of European Contact**: The arrival of Europeans in the 15th century had a profound impact on Indigenous populations, leading to significant demographic, cultural, and social changes due to colonization, disease, and displacement. The history of human migration to the Americas is complex and continues to be an area of active research, with new discoveries constantly reshaping our understanding of the past. Yes, the presence of humans in the Americas as early as 14,500 years ago can be seen as contradicting a literal interpretation of the Noah story in the Bible.
Thanks once again for Watching. We love to read your comments. It means a lot to us.
Please the Word : " Germany" in the Video was Misspelled. The real word is JŌMON. Not Germany. We tried correcting it, but it ended up still repeating the same words.
Remain blessed.
Some said they are intertwinned between european , jews and unknown ancient primordial people
Humans are believed to have migrated to the American continent from Asia during the last Ice Age, around 15,000 to 20,000 years ago. They crossed a land bridge known as Beringia, which connected present-day Siberia in Asia to Alaska in North America. This migration occurred in several waves, with groups of hunter-gatherers following herds of large game animals. Over thousands of years, these early populations spread throughout North and South America, adapting to various environments and developing diverse cultures.
Thanks for sharing
The migration of humans from Asia to the Americas is a significant event in human history, often referred to in the context of the "Peopling of the Americas." Here are some key points to consider:
1. **Beringia Land Bridge**: During the last Ice Age, sea levels were much lower due to large amounts of water being locked in ice sheets. This exposed a land bridge called Beringia, which connected Asia and North America. It is hypothesized that this land bridge was a migration route for early humans.
2. **Timing of Migration**: While estimates suggest that the first migrations occurred between 15,000 and 20,000 years ago, some evidence points to even earlier migrations. Archaeological sites, like those at Monte Verde in Chile, suggest that humans may have been in South America as early as 14,500 years ago.
3. **Cultural Diversity**: As these early populations spread across the Americas, they adapted to various environments, leading to the development of diverse cultures. Some groups became nomadic hunter-gatherers, while others settled and developed agriculture.
4. **Languages and Groups**: Over time, these early populations evolved into numerous distinct groups with different languages, customs, and social structures. By the time Europeans arrived in the late 15th century, there were hundreds of distinct Indigenous cultures throughout North and South America.
5. **Genetic Studies**: Recent genetic research has provided insights into the migration patterns and ancestry of Indigenous peoples in the Americas. It has shown connections between Indigenous populations in the Americas and various groups in Siberia, supporting the theory of a single migration event followed by subsequent waves.
6. **Alternative Theories**: While the Beringia land bridge is the most widely accepted theory, there are other hypotheses, such as coastal migration routes along the Pacific coast or even migration through the Atlantic. However, these theories are less supported by archaeological evidence.
7. **Impact of European Contact**: The arrival of Europeans in the 15th century had a profound impact on Indigenous populations, leading to significant demographic, cultural, and social changes due to colonization, disease, and displacement.
The history of human migration to the Americas is complex and continues to be an area of active research, with new discoveries constantly reshaping our understanding of the past.
Yes, the presence of humans in the Americas as early as 14,500 years ago can be seen as contradicting a literal interpretation of the Noah story in the Bible.
Thanks for this beautiful insight. We have also made a video on the origins of the indigenous peoples of America according to the Bible. But we haven't really take a deep dive on this as regards to DNA and Genetic Origin. Your writeup is very well appreciated.
During the time just before European contact with the Americas (around the late 15th century), the population of Europe is estimated to have been between 60 million to 80 million people.
Comparing the two:
- **Indigenous Population of the Americas**: Estimated between 50 million to 100 million.
- **Population of Europe**: Estimated between 60 million to 80 million.
This means that, at that time, the population of the Americas was comparable to, and in some estimates, possibly greater than, the population of Europe. However, it’s important to note that the population estimates for both regions have a significant margin of uncertainty due to limited data and varying methodologies used in historical demographic studies.
Thank you
@@alyciawang2892 Thanks for watching.
True story- almost 60 years ago, my grandma was a very religious, farmer in a little village in Romania. I asked her what was written in the end of the Bible. Her answer was “ the yellow people will rule the world “ , nothing else. Her answer was the truth for me, never doubt it till now. I never investigated, I just wished good will to yellow people all my life, because she was smiling hopefully when she was given me the answer.
Except that’s Not what the End of the Bible says. Your grandma must be a Yellow skin fanatic herself.
Other than producing the terrible leader of history like Genghis Khan, Yellow skin might also produce the Anti-Christ of the End times. Jesus is coming back and he is brown skin from Middle East Arabia, not Yellow skin of East Asia.
@@elenanastase6084 who are the Yellow people specifically?
I was a child then, didn’t know much about the civilizations… later I supposed to be the people in the Far East… for 40 years I am living in the Middle East , I’m aware of the predictions .. I need to add, my grandmother was not educated or traveled… I don’t know from where she came up with that answer.. but she had a lot of stories about things happening when people were different.
The Yellow people are whitening.
There are stories from old cultures past down to new cultures that one time some Chinese movement back 3 or 4 thousand years ago, left China, to form their own country. This group of people developed their own sword fighting skills. China sent many armies over and over again to try to defeat them, but couldn't. So, today, 21st century, Japan is now their own country! DNA would differently show where they came from 3 or 4 thousand years ago... I was told this story by old wise men 54 years ago, in China town, California...
Amazing insights you have here. It's not far from the truth. Thanks a lot for sharing it.
Chanes+Korean+Mongolian+Japanese+Vietnamese
Thanks for watching.
The art is AI, the narrator is AI. Not a real video.
Thanks for watching. And remain blessed
Does not matter, audio is enough for knowledge
Except for the Bible part, the information is quite accurate. All the three groups also know it is true, but because of their pride, national and political interest they will have to dispute it.
Thanks so much for watching.
Mongolian tribes and Manchurian have large populations than Korean and Japanese.
Korean and Japanese people are unique under eagle empires.
That's why Korean and Japanese feel supertthan people of mainland China and Southeast Asia.
韩国人和日本人只是一群在中国大陆激烈竞争中的流亡失败者的集合。这就是为什么中国人比日本人和韩国人更优越的原因。次生文明永远低劣。
BS. Most Korean and Japanese cultures are adopted from Chinese culture; in this case, they couldn't be superior to the Chinese, just like all countries adopting Western culture couldn't be superior to the Westerners. Use your logic. You must be an Indian to have come up with such an idiotic assumption.
Yes Chinese first and then Korea Japan and orher gradually.
@@刚王-d3s What is the purpose of chasing the wind?
Clueless as it can be under your assumption. 😂😂😂
East Asian Ancestry has been ignored by the general public, but people in the know that they descended from ancient Central Asian peoples. So, where did Caucasians come from. Caucasians as we know them came from some small population in what is now known as Turkiye, but where from before that?
Why does the trail go cold before that? They didn't always exist. East Asians as we know them now didn't always exist. So what existed before that? We didn't suddenly go from Africans to as we are now.
There must be a transition, but where is that in the archaeological record?
There needs to be a documentary taking us from ancient Africa to now in one complete sweep.
@@kaneowaikiki3298 hmmm..very deep. How many can history really cover. I still think there are still many missing pieces in these stories.
@@Biblestoriesunveiled-q1t Are you kidding?! 1.Shem, 3.Ham and 2. Japhet.
Remember To Be GoodTrueKind.
@1:27 is misLeading, as it is Known from The Holy Semitic Steles of Kaifeng esp. 《重建清真寺記》 that 阿耽←אָדָם (Adam) himself Descends from several Generations downward from The Archancestor 盤古 .
Even if 雅弗←יֶפֶת (Japheth) 's descendants migrated back to the Pre-Existing Ancestral Homeland, they would simply be assimilating (i.e. Ascending) back to The Original Civilization 中國.
We had to use th Holy Scriptures narratives. Thanks once more for watching
The assumption of mentioning the Bible in the beginning already made the whole video useless. 😂😂😂
@@CAL-YOU thanks for watching. The channel is a Christian channel. We believe in the Bible and that God created all living things. Remain blessed.
6:17 you wish. Japanese descended from African pygmies according to top Chinese scientist that conducted study at the university of Beijing.
Yes. That was before they migrated to East Asian. Thanks for watching.
If so, why are the Orientals not black?
@PahatRout it could be north Africa.
@@Biblestoriesunveiled-q1t , How come as per The Bell Curve Report indicates, the orientalists seem to gather more IQ rating than their ancestors in Africa? Or even the peoples in-between Africa and The Far East??
Indians come in many shades.
Early Europeans were darker.
Freckles were proof of their former pigment fading away overtime
The Uighurs are turks
The tibetans
And ethnic Chinese
Thanks for watching. Your comment means a lot to us..
You believe in the story of Noah? 😂😂
@@johnlay3040 Yes I do.
@johnlay3040 Yes, it's the truth. Shem, Ham (Africans) and Japhet (Asians)
@ROKBUZZCUT You better read more than 1 book. In what country did you get your education from?
Korea is located just to the South East of China, not to the North East of China as narrated at the 4:49 time stamped mark of this video.
Ur joking me right?..............
Western propaganda. Christian one of them
They're not descendants of Japheth (Europeans are), but descendants of Kain, that survived the Flood.
@@nortons7040 amazing. But according to the Bible it was only Noah's family that survived the flood.
@@Biblestoriesunveiled-q1t Well, Jews weren't in the Far East to witness it. But if you investigate peculiarity of Far Eastern geology you'll find out that, unlike in all other regions of the World, stones there are so called "pre-hystoric", which means not affected neither by glacier, nor flood.
@@Biblestoriesunveiled-q1t theoretically, Hinduism and its precursor traditions existed long before the time traditionally associated with Noah and the Great Flood, as described in the Bible.
The timeline often cited for the Biblical Flood is based on interpretations of genealogies and narratives in the Hebrew Bible, placing it around 2300-2500 BCE, although these dates can vary widely depending on different religious and scholarly interpretations.
In contrast, the roots of Hinduism can be traced back to the Indus Valley Civilization (approximately 2500-1900 BCE) and the subsequent development of the Vedic texts (around 1500 BCE). This suggests that certain aspects of Hindu beliefs and practices were already in existence before the events described in the Noah narrative.
And that suggest that at least India was not flooded. That also suggests Himalaya mountains could be dry all time of the flood just because it is 3700 meters higher than Ararat.
That is way above what bible says about water depths: 15 cubits or 6.7 meters. But somehow Israeli mountains were covered.
@@MolDo57The Great Flood is a World wide event, even the promised set by Rainbow can be see World wide. Hindu must repent of your sins and believe, the Unbelievers in the End times will be most unfortunate.
@@Biblestoriesunveiled-q1t
Nonsense! =>(But according to the Bible it was only Noah's family that survived the flood.).
The migration of humans from Asia to the Americas is a significant event in human history, often referred to in the context of the "Peopling of the Americas." Here are some key points to consider:
1. **Beringia Land Bridge**: During the last Ice Age, sea levels were much lower due to large amounts of water being locked in ice sheets. This exposed a land bridge called Beringia, which connected Asia and North America. It is hypothesized that this land bridge was a migration route for early humans.
2. **Timing of Migration**: While estimates suggest that the first migrations occurred between 15,000 and 20,000 years ago, some evidence points to even earlier migrations. Archaeological sites, like those at Monte Verde in Chile, suggest that humans may have been in South America as early as 14,500 years ago.
3. **Cultural Diversity**: As these early populations spread across the Americas, they adapted to various environments, leading to the development of diverse cultures. Some groups became nomadic hunter-gatherers, while others settled and developed agriculture.
4. **Languages and Groups**: Over time, these early populations evolved into numerous distinct groups with different languages, customs, and social structures. By the time Europeans arrived in the late 15th century, there were hundreds of distinct Indigenous cultures throughout North and South America.
5. **Genetic Studies**: Recent genetic research has provided insights into the migration patterns and ancestry of Indigenous peoples in the Americas. It has shown connections between Indigenous populations in the Americas and various groups in Siberia, supporting the theory of a single migration event followed by subsequent waves.
6. **Alternative Theories**: While the Beringia land bridge is the most widely accepted theory, there are other hypotheses, such as coastal migration routes along the Pacific coast or even migration through the Atlantic. However, these theories are less supported by archaeological evidence.
7. **Impact of European Contact**: The arrival of Europeans in the 15th century had a profound impact on Indigenous populations, leading to significant demographic, cultural, and social changes due to colonization, disease, and displacement.
The history of human migration to the Americas is complex and continues to be an area of active research, with new discoveries constantly reshaping our understanding of the past.
Yes, the presence of humans in the Americas as early as 14,500 years ago can be seen as contradicting a literal interpretation of the Noah story in the Bible.