Thank you for the video. From most of the fools currently discussing the war between Israel and Hamas, one would be led to believe international law demands a proportional amount of civilian casualties on both sides. This is clearly irrelevant. They should all watch this video before spouting nonsense.
Invasion is the antithesis of rules or rules based order, and therefore rules are out the window. The UN has been derelict in not yet having a General Assembly vote on a proportionality of response of 0.9 for 1. 0.9 to point to less war not more war. If the UN fails with such basic and fundamental comment or yardstick for moral authority and humanity, - it has truly failed. What is it doing?
Thank you for the video. From most of the fools currently discussing the war between Israel and Hamas, one would be led to believe international law demands a proportional amount of civilian casualties on both sides. This is clearly irrelevant. They should all watch this video before spouting nonsense.
Perfect explanation 🙏💝🇵🇬
Do you have an example of a war that followed these rules?
Good Job
Parties of International Armed Conflict and Non-International Armed Conflict and the UN are taking new strategies in armed conflict.
What is the baluny!
👍
FB1-MAIN 1❤️
Invasion is the antithesis of rules or rules based order, and therefore rules are out the window.
The UN has been derelict in not yet having a General Assembly vote on a proportionality of response of 0.9 for 1. 0.9 to point to less war not more war.
If the UN fails with such basic and fundamental comment or yardstick for moral authority and humanity, - it has truly failed.
What is it doing?