Best Diver Under $1000? Christopher Ward Trident Pro 600

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 28 ก.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 756

  • @AbyssalTentacle
    @AbyssalTentacle 5 ปีที่แล้ว +171

    If you sign up for their newsletter , there’s usually a code given out often that makes this $785 shipped !

    • @MrBacchus18
      @MrBacchus18 5 ปีที่แล้ว +19

      Thumbs up so hopefully your comment goes near the top. Don't buy C.W. without a coupon.

    • @scottsj4625
      @scottsj4625 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Thank you. I hope others see this.

    • @woosha10
      @woosha10 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      How often do they send these out ?

    • @jasongennero2925
      @jasongennero2925 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Which is exactly the price of a longines hyrdo conquest in any color way you want. Brand new with warranty. I'd take the longines diver for the$785 personally thank you. But hey, to each their own i guess, lol.

    • @scottsj4625
      @scottsj4625 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@jasongennero2925 Could you kindly provide a link? I heard of the brand, I can't remember if it is owned by Richmont of Swatch group.

  • @joeyb7576
    @joeyb7576 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I think you are one of the most genuine reviewers in the industry and few have your integrity and enthusiasm.
    Excellent review, I’ve considered CW several times, but yet to pull the trigger. Would love to see a change to the logo. I absolutely love the hands.

  • @KongBobbyK
    @KongBobbyK 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I like how the dial is designed. Totally balanced in my eyes. There is something at 3, 6, 9 and 12 and the logo is not too much in your face. Minimalist approach. If you look closely
    the logo is the Swiss flag followed by the English flag.

  • @spook44
    @spook44 5 ปีที่แล้ว +96

    It appears that I’m in the minority, but I actually like the 9 o’clock placement of the branding

    • @rever-mi6qz
      @rever-mi6qz 5 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      same, you directly see it's a CW, which is a good thing. I think people are going to like it more in the future.

    • @Bugster987
      @Bugster987 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I like it too. I’ve never thought the previous branding was very strong.

    • @rashid_art
      @rashid_art 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Glashütte brands at 9oclock, but that font is really really cheap

    • @everettmeadows5833
      @everettmeadows5833 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      40 and 20 approved logo, for sure!

    • @FatSamEIE
      @FatSamEIE 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The old branding looks really dated. I cant see how people keep saying it was better?!

  • @inkitatus1
    @inkitatus1 5 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    Got a C65 classic...can't fault it, excellent quality & value. I'm saving for another model (& hinting to the Mrs as its my birthday in September... so I'll casually leave my pad laying around with this review "half watched" 😉) Cheers mate 👍👍⌚👍👍

  • @niveusgaius
    @niveusgaius 5 ปีที่แล้ว +33

    About time you reviewed Christopher Ward. They are a terrific brand.

    • @nhblackdc5
      @nhblackdc5 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I just can't get over the brand name. Everything else is great.

  • @christophernewman2817
    @christophernewman2817 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I think I've indirectly benefited from this review: CW sent round a 'sale' email a couple of weeks ago and I picked up the last of the MkII C60 Trident Pro 600 38mm for just under half price. It is a stunning watch (a few minor differences from the one you review in the video, but certainly not $500 worth of upgrades). The MkII feels every bit the $1000 watch you describe. You weren't joking Jody - this is a hell of a watch for the money.

  • @q3znw6j88aywnwy
    @q3znw6j88aywnwy 5 ปีที่แล้ว +34

    Getting the big sponsorships now :D proud of you

    • @KongBobbyK
      @KongBobbyK 5 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      He really deserve it. Always at point and pointing flaws we normally do not see. Even the watch companies can benefit and start making even better watches.

  • @nunomendes2484
    @nunomendes2484 5 ปีที่แล้ว +75

    I'm a fan of CW. Almost pulled my trigger on a CW65 Trident a while ago... One more glass of wine and i would of done it.

  • @megalomouthradio5839
    @megalomouthradio5839 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Right now I’m wearing a Christopher Ward Trident 🔱 300 quartz , with the new logo.
    This is one of my favorite watches I’ve ever owned.
    $390 shipped. Worth every penny.

  • @Bugster987
    @Bugster987 5 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I had the 38mm MK2 version and like this one more. More modern design. I even like the logo design now they have added the flags at 12 (the C65 GMT I now have has an embossed logo which works even better). Christoper Ward make excellent watches.

  • @melody3741
    @melody3741 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I love the left-right balance used to watch as well as the nearly invisible logo, I think that because that balancing is different, you need that little bit of space somewhere and I think up top is perfect. And just in case it's a problem and is to empty, and there's still that logo there. I think it's perfect.

  • @cavalry1213
    @cavalry1213 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Hell no! My Oris was 2 grand and I only got a 2 year warranty! I only got an extra year because I registered it on the Oris website. 5 years is unheard of and amazing.

  • @ksgphotography
    @ksgphotography 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Cracking review. I can confirm what Rikki said about the bezel research, as CW himself told us at The a Edinburgh meet a few weeks before launch. He referenced the Rolex Submariner as having the best action and sound, so that’s what they aimed for. Such a shame they’re getting a lot of bad QC and customer service issues just now, as they do produce great watches, which punch well above their weight.

  • @jmdudley3859
    @jmdudley3859 5 ปีที่แล้ว +50

    I'm going start a you tube channel reviewing watches just to get free watches ! I will be a true Scotsmen if I can pull this off, that's being truly frugal ! Cheers!

  • @cjcar63
    @cjcar63 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Christopher Ward seems like a great brand at the price point... 60 month warranty on the movement! The finishing reminds me of what you find on most Tudors. I particularly like the C65 blue dial Dartmouth Series. Looks a lot like a Seamaster 300.

    • @jeffd3802
      @jeffd3802 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      The cases are made in same place as tudor

  • @denisdaly1708
    @denisdaly1708 3 ปีที่แล้ว +27

    They should use CW as their logo.

  • @tyelwell9
    @tyelwell9 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I love the branding and logo. There are so many with the "normal" setup, so it's ok to have a couple with a bit of a difference.

  • @watchalot919
    @watchalot919 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Had mine a few years. The watch is absolutely outstanding, and the best watch in my collection. That said, I don't own anything more expensive. The previous logo was far nicer though, and I don't know why they changed it.

  • @thrifty85
    @thrifty85 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Just purchased this watch (38mm) and it’s outstanding. It looks stunning and you’d think it was more expensive than it is. I have a 17cm wrist and struggled to find a dive/sports watch that doesn’t make me look like a 10 year old wearing his dads watch but this has done the job perfectly. Can’t fault it.

    • @DutchBulldog
      @DutchBulldog 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hey Jamie, I have a 16 cm wrist and I’m trying to decide between the 38mm and the 40mm black dial variant. How do you feel about the 38mm one month after your purchase?

    • @thrifty85
      @thrifty85 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Daniël Granja Baltazar I’ve since realised my wrist is 16.5cm and I bought the 38mm and it’s spot on. You won’t be dissatisfied.

    • @DutchBulldog
      @DutchBulldog 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Jamie Thrift thank you for the quick reply. Much appreciated mate! 👍🏼

    • @thrifty85
      @thrifty85 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Daniël Granja Baltazar tell you what mate, I’m thinking of selling mine? I’ve only had it 2 months, barely worn it. I Fancy the c65 now

  • @rmelo5932
    @rmelo5932 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I love this brand. I have a red bezel 42mm Trident Pro 600 and 38mm vintage Trident Pro 600. I was able to get both for under $800 Canadian dollars each.

  • @itsallrobbish
    @itsallrobbish 4 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Looks like a classy timepiece, I’m tempted. Great review btw.

    • @JustOneMoreWatch
      @JustOneMoreWatch  4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Thanks Robert! Very solid watch that has become a bit of a benchmark for me now. If you like the look, and the branding, then go for it!

  • @veritas_24
    @veritas_24 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I bought a c60 Trident Pro a couple years ago, when they still had the onion hands. In the first 30 days the movement started acting funny. I reached out to customer service, and they responded super quickly and took care of me. They setup someone to come pick up my watch from my house for free, and they sent me a new watch in a couple weeks. Really excellent experience, and have enjoyed wearing the watch daily ever since.

  • @Trevor-kd8nk
    @Trevor-kd8nk 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I really love the trident second hand it’s so beautiful and unique

  • @paulstevenson200
    @paulstevenson200 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Yes.Yes. Yes.
    Jody, I had almost given up on a C. Ward review from you so many thanks for this.
    There does seem to be a touch of snobbery around the brand until reviewers get one on the wrist and even poor Adrian over at Bark and Jack found himself spluttering some compliments into his coffee when he reviewed similar. That was a bit of a wow moment.
    I am the very proud owner of a Trident 300 quartz 38mm which my wife bought me and I love it. The craftsmanship is simply gorgeous and the watch sits beautifully on my smallish wrist. It really is a joy to wear. I can only guess at what you have received.
    Pound for pound I think C. Ward offer probably the best value on the market and no question their after sales service is number one.
    Certainly, the logo is contentious and it gave me the jitters initially but after many hours on the wrist I have to say it is no longer an issue. I do agree though that the iteration has not yet reached its apotheosis.
    A wonderful review, giving a lovely watch the time and attention it deserves.
    Thank you.

    • @JustOneMoreWatch
      @JustOneMoreWatch  5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thanks for your kind words! Cheers, Jody

  • @PatrickEVRAable
    @PatrickEVRAable 4 ปีที่แล้ว +30

    I've owned a Trident pro 43mm MK2 for 3 years. I get countless comments on it every time I wear it. The feeling of quality you get when you wear is is something I haven't had with a watch costing under 5k. It miles a head of something even such as an Oris or Squale. Mine is the first to have the logo at the 9pm position, and it almost prevented me from buying it, but I'm so glad it didn't because I absolutely love it and can't see me ever getting rid of it, God knows it's gonna last me a life time.

  • @kerpowski1
    @kerpowski1 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Nice looking watch, super sharp! My favourite C. Ward though is the C65 Trident GMT, it's pretty much perfect in every way in my opinion. Can't be beat for around a grand!

  • @chrispeek380
    @chrispeek380 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Tempting ... but at approx 1,000 dollars (for me in my shopping preferences) the real competition is an Oris Aquis on sale or via one of the NYC gray market websites for $ 900-$1200 new. The warranty is very impressive and look is very clean. I would see it being a contender at 500-600 but at $1000 that's another level. The spelled out name bothers me but as you said it's part of the package. Honestly, full name logo aside it's one of the most attractive and sleekly designed watches you've ever featured.
    If I'm stroking a check or pressing a key for $1,000 I want a watch with some heft behind the name. I like the watch design-wise and the warranty is great, but I'm not coughing up $1000 for it.

    • @anonypersona3189
      @anonypersona3189 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      It's not $1000, It's $900 retail and with sales you have have it around $800 or less. For the value I've yet to find another watch that can match a CW in quality/fit/finish... or even come close. The timepieces are amazing. I just don't fancy the design and that's the only thing keeping me from buying one. Being compared to Oris is truly flattering, so CW has come a long way. Oris is the gold standard when it comes to $1000 watches but I see CW as the microbrand to beat. Just try out one of their watches (you have 60 days to return it for free, they even pay for shipping) and see for yourself.

  • @neilredmond1011
    @neilredmond1011 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    C/ward make great quality watches , I own 4 and every one is superb, the C60 range are unbeatable value, I have the limited edition ombré model cosc certified and it is as well made if not better than a lot of the so called luxury brands at twice the price, brilliant company and excellent value for money, for example the tag aquaracer is twice the price and doesn’t come close to the C60 in build quality, I owned and sold my tag caliber 5 when I bought my C60 ombré, i own a Tudor bb which in my opinion is the best watch in the world for the price and it’s not far off that quality ! That’s how good it is

  • @PaulEmery
    @PaulEmery 5 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    I don’t understand the hate with the identity/logo. As a designer I love where CW have arrived.
    The elephant in the room for me on the new trid3nt divers is that ridiculous sword hour hand. Proportions really not doing doing it for me personally.
    Great review though, thanks!

    • @stuartcole4845
      @stuartcole4845 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Notice how even you referred to them as CW? Yea, most people would have much less of a problem with them if they actually branded as “CW”.

  • @rick3670
    @rick3670 5 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    Gorgeous watch! Great review, I appreciate the phrasing (not ‘unbalanced’, just a different placement of the Christopher Word font). Overall? It’s a little out of my price range, but I still enjoyed the review! Keep up the great work!

    • @vokeyuk
      @vokeyuk 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      its worth signing up to the newsletter they offer, they normally give plenty of notice of incoming sales. and there are some great bargains to be had, I got an older trident for almost 50% off, and its a stunning watch.

  • @ogarzabello
    @ogarzabello 5 ปีที่แล้ว +170

    I absolutely HATE the "Christopher Ward" billboard on the dial.

    • @drfdwf392
      @drfdwf392 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      ​@Brenton Edwards same with the Hamilton Jazzmaster Viewmatic open heart. Beautiful timepiece, but branding has no elegance. Even the font and size choice are just damn uninspiring. Even undergraduate multimedia arts students can create so much better than these brands did. I can't believe they can't even find or pay someone with expertise/taste/style in design and branding. These lazy branding designs make me puke. Too bad since the timepiece themselves are really good.

    • @montellanojavelosa6249
      @montellanojavelosa6249 5 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Thanks for representing a lot of us who feel the same way! It doesnt have the same appeal as "Patek Philippe" just not a cool name and my name is Christopher myself 🤣

    • @GS-vb3zn
      @GS-vb3zn 5 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      It’s grown on me. I HATED it. Now I really like it.

    • @rogerl7533
      @rogerl7533 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @Brenton Edwards It's gay. Not that there's anything wrong with that. But it is gay, and gay isn't my thing.

    • @muffe5537
      @muffe5537 5 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Same. I'd literally never buy one JUST because of it. It looks so tacky

  • @khronokraze
    @khronokraze 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I've enjoyed the c60 and c65 cw's. This c60 mk3 is the best. The case is really nicely done and the bracelet's quick attach/removal and easy micro adjust has not been an issue. May be the best sub $1k modern diver. The logo does not bother me at all. I'm just waiting for more colors.. i would love the new white dial black bezel option they have on the 42mm version in the 40mm as well.

  • @TripAstute
    @TripAstute 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Fantastic watch and review! I have the C65 Trident GMT and I absolutely love it. It’s hard to beat the value provided by Christopher Ward. 😎

  • @albruder7249
    @albruder7249 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Had to use the warranty at 4 years. Great experience working with CW. They provided free air shipping from California back to England. Had the watch back in 7 weeks.

  • @megaman9039
    @megaman9039 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Great video as always, Jody!! The only things I'd change on what is otherwise a total winner is the logo at nine, highlight the one at twelve and sort the bracelet adjustment!!! Just saying.......

  • @stanmann1984
    @stanmann1984 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I am so glad you did a review of this beautiful piece! I've been looking at this one for a few months now since its release and I'm quite fond of it. Might make this my Christmas gift to myself this year😎 great vid as always🍻

  • @ericsimon1630
    @ericsimon1630 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great review. CW sent me a sale email this morning, so I just ordered the Trident Pro in blue for about $800. It will be my third CW, and am really looking forward to receiving it.

  • @desmodue944
    @desmodue944 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I just order a 40mm black C60 Trident Pro, because of the simple font, clean logo and unique branding. Considered a few others for several hundred less, but just couldn't bring myself pull the trigger on a Folex®

  • @joelopic
    @joelopic 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Extremely nice watch and great value for your buck. 600 m diver. The case has a Breitling Superocean heritage feel about it and looks like it wants to punch on with the Oris Aquis and hydroconquest. Maybe the "best" choice at the price point. Would be cooler on a nice endmill bracelet or a mesh like the Breitling.

  • @megalomouthradio5839
    @megalomouthradio5839 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I’m currently wearing a 🔱 Trident 300 with the orange bezel. Love it.

  • @jameshammond7921
    @jameshammond7921 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Another great watch review! I bought the white-dial version and it's everything Jody said: it's a great watch but the lume and logo let down the side a little bit. The lume is weaker than it should be and the logo always makes me think it quarter-to-something at a quick glance but otherwise it's a terrific watch and a great value.

  • @hansmayer7587
    @hansmayer7587 5 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    I bought Certina ds action diver blue dial couple of months ago,and I must say i cant imagine a better diver around 1000$.

    • @oliverceberg9137
      @oliverceberg9137 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Hans Mayer perfect watch 👍🏼 love Certina ⏱

    • @MrMaramba
      @MrMaramba 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      how is the accuracy out of the box end how is the watch overall i am also about to buy one ds action diver or the seiko sbdc053 thinking

    • @hansmayer7587
      @hansmayer7587 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@MrMaramba I bought the old model with eta 2824-2 not with powermatic and it goes with +7 sec/24h.I compared the level of finish with tag heuer aquaracer which is much more expensive and there was no difference, all surfaces are brushed no polish but I think that suits a tool watch. On the other hand the seiko which you are considering buying runs with 6r15 which is also a great movement.i have it in my sarb033 and it runs extremly accurate (+2-3 sec/24h) with very good power reserve of 50+ hours. Both watches are awesome its up to you which look you like more.

  • @thomaslienert4225
    @thomaslienert4225 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    There, you did it, my Trident is on order. The current 50% off sale did not hurt either.

  • @BLeuchteProductions
    @BLeuchteProductions 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Appreciate the "Ministry of Silly Walks" shirt :D

  • @martin4374
    @martin4374 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    You're right! Logos are tricky. Just look at Phoibos. The first text logo was absolutely horrendous! THEN, they nailed it with the Octopus (Cthulhu) logo 🔥🔥🔥👏👏👏

  • @knutvikgundersen4048
    @knutvikgundersen4048 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I have the GMT version. Love it. Only annoyance is that the bezel is unidirectional. Should be bidirectional on a GMT.

  • @cuddlefish999
    @cuddlefish999 5 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    I love that case shape, but the name in the default font is very off putting for me. Around this price i would be temped to pay a little more and get a zodiac seawolf, squale or push more for a sinn104. Love the vid jody!

    • @jasongennero2925
      @jasongennero2925 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Couldn't have said it better brother. Cheers

    • @rioriggs3568
      @rioriggs3568 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      I agree 100%

    • @angelos6817
      @angelos6817 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I did pay more and ended up with a Sinn 104 and I'm very happy. I just don't get excited by this watch. It looks like a generic Chinese special to me with a silly name in a sillier position on the dial.

    • @rioriggs3568
      @rioriggs3568 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Angelo Soulas : I also agree 100%. It looks like the 43m Parnis with the Miyota mouvement and 20 atm going for under $100.

    • @ajpappas7652
      @ajpappas7652 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      It is in helvetica....

  • @marcoscova8271
    @marcoscova8271 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Great review. I see lots of comments sugesting the Longines Hydroconquest as a contender. I was expecting many people suggesting Steinhart as well. I've never held one in my hands, but my impression is that they are (also) very well built and finnished. Care to give your view on how the Steinhart stack up againts the CW?

  • @eggsII
    @eggsII 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    It’s interesting to see how Ward mixes modern with austere in their aesthetic. Simple dial, clean font, but his shine bezel and distinctive second hand flourish. I kinda don’t know what to make of it...

  • @wpherigo1
    @wpherigo1 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I also don’t mind you getting a free watch as long as you are honest with the review. You don’t get rich doing YT videos!
    I love the watch. The trident is super. Excellent choice, Jody. I don’t mind branding. If you create a watch, why shouldn’t you brand it? First world problem, for sure.

  • @martinwyllie9706
    @martinwyllie9706 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I have both the c9 5 day auto and trident pro 600 both are fantastic watches for the price far exceeding some better known alternatives , frederique constant and Oris respectively . As you mentioned CW aftercare is second to none so can’t rete the brand high enough . I prefer a more symmetrical look to dial with regards to new logo placement. Don’t just follow the crowd try Christopher Ward.

  • @moorwatch9654
    @moorwatch9654 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Stealth logos are cool imo
    Great video as always, you have one of the best “back catalogue” of videos on youtube! Excellent re-watch value too

  • @tikkathreebarrels
    @tikkathreebarrels 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I believe half links are coming. My preference is the older Mk1 and 2 hand sets but I adore this light catcher case.

  • @hrs.ai2018
    @hrs.ai2018 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    It seems that they have listened to your suggestion, latest version have included half ring on it

  • @freddie8354
    @freddie8354 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I agree with your point of the Moans & Niggles. Would have prefered if they had stuck with the "Ch. Ward", if they really have to keep it. Hopefully they stop using the writing and just use the little cross logo only. In my opinion it will make the watch look a lot sharper than it already is. I hope you get to review the GMT I would like to know your thoughts on it.
    Thanks for another great review and congrats on another great addition to your collection 💪💪...... (the Oris 65 though 😍😍.

  • @GlenParker73
    @GlenParker73 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    I pulled the trigger on the previous C65 blue wave dial version not so long ago and love it. I now have it on a tan suede strap and it looks the dogs, well to me it does.

  • @LouisWinthorpe622
    @LouisWinthorpe622 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    They're better than I thought. That case 'scalloping', facetting, shaping and polishing reminds me, maybe a little, of the sarb033, my own sbdc053 (6Rmas), and then some! The case and back are fantastic. The new hands are an improvement, too.
    Really like that there's a 40mm. Not '41.this' or '38.that'. I've a few over-40 divers but a recent homage purchase has made me feel like a bit smaller, at 40mm, is the way. Among other things: it seems a bit more civilised (or something), haha.
    I wouldn't quibble about their logo, either. It's only small and in the subtlest of fonts.
    I would choose this over my Hydroconquest if I was looking for something in that price bracket, today.

  • @MrWayneploof
    @MrWayneploof 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    IT's a beautiful looking watch

  • @simonwood5587
    @simonwood5587 5 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    The bad font / branding wrecks these. Gives a cheap department store / fashion vibe a la "Michael Kors".

  • @chrisward2954
    @chrisward2954 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    It's got my name on it so what can I say! I love it and am getting one for Christmas! It's a fabulous looking watch and I can't wait to get mine. I would prefer to have the name at the top but it's not the end of the world. Who wouldn't want a quality watch with your own name on it!!!! Perfect....

  • @orenovadia6590
    @orenovadia6590 5 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    I would buy a mido captain day date and 80 hour power reserve

    • @LuisCardoso-bo8yx
      @LuisCardoso-bo8yx 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Dick Grantberg The issue with that movement is that it cannot be regulated and serviced the same way a more traditional movement can. That’s a no go for me, for instance. As such, I wouldn’t consider any watch with a Powermatic 80 movement.

  • @eusupporter8438
    @eusupporter8438 5 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    If you say it is a good watch...it is a good watch. 👍

  • @CC-oc3jv
    @CC-oc3jv 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    I really like Davosa Ternos for the money. 40mm 200m dive watch with ETA 2824-2 for about $800. Love that watch. And they now have distribution in the USA so you dont have to send overseas for any warranty issues that would unlikely to happen.

  • @bogrot69
    @bogrot69 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I picked up the C60 Trident Bronze Ombré COSC Limited Edition a few months ago and it's become one of my favorites. It's the watch that I get the most compliments on as well. As for the logo, I never really thought twice about it. So far it hasn't interfered with the accuracy of the watch in any way. I've seen many reviews of the CW's including this one and there have been very few negative comments about them. I've always found your reviews to be very fair, whether you purchased the watch in question or it was provided gratis. Although it can be difficult at times taking you seriously when you're wearing your Ministry Of Silly Walks shirt :)

  • @fedemotta3
    @fedemotta3 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great review Jody! I would add to the negs, the hour and minutes hands. Shapewise its up to personal preference, but I really dislike that they have "butts"

  • @urieelSEptim
    @urieelSEptim 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    I love their C1 Grand Malvern Power Reserve. Its quite impressive to get an in-house movement for this price!

  • @mrbacchus6127
    @mrbacchus6127 5 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    Longines Hydroconquest ie around the same price grey market with a similar aesthetic.

    • @mrand3r50n3
      @mrand3r50n3 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      The new Hydroconquest looks much better than the old, dial is less busy. This CW is lacking in terms of the movement compared to Longines, Mido, Certina or even Seikos around $1000 with the 6r15. SW-200 just isn't worth $1000, you can find it in watches for around $400.

    • @knightwhite99
      @knightwhite99 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I agree - I have the Longines HydroConquest, and I got mine for $800 USD. At that price, I think it’s a better bargain, even though I have the older model with the aluminum bezel.
      I also have a Revue Thommen with the Planet Ocean type hands that is right now my favorite watch - I think it’s a screaming bargain at around $400 USD, but at 45mm diameter and 52mm lug to lug, you need at least a 7.25” to pull it off.

    • @knightwhite99
      @knightwhite99 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      What about the Oceaneva that you just reviewed, Jody? Wasn’t that one of the best watches for under $1000 too?

    • @markgill8444
      @markgill8444 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@mrand3r50n3 the sw-200 Is much better than the overrated 6r15 in my experience. I have 3 CWs with this movement. They run from +1.2 to -4.5 spd, beat at 28800 bph and have been quite reliable over 18 months. In contrast, the 6r15 beats at 21600 bph, suffers terribly from positional variation And mine is running at -60 spd after 15 months. Yes, it's obviously faulty, but in general from what I've read, the 6r15 does seem to be hit or miss.

    • @jpcfernandes
      @jpcfernandes 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      MrAnd3r50n I've a SARB033 that I like, but would never say 6r15 is better than a SW200. Not even close.

  • @stuckintheeighties487
    @stuckintheeighties487 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I've owned several cw watches, they are superb value for money. The finish and qc is comparable to the overpriced swiss stuff.
    I wish I still had my mk1 trident

  • @JoelManers
    @JoelManers 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Is it just me or does the 12:00 indicator on the bezel not quite line up with the dial? (12:13) Maybe it’s just my eyes.

  • @douglasladowski6342
    @douglasladowski6342 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Jody, I think you have done an excellent review in regards to the CW. This is a brand that has caught a lot of attention for a reason. I could have "endured" a little more macro of this one. Lol

    • @JustOneMoreWatch
      @JustOneMoreWatch  5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Noted. Still trying to integrate it better, and learn how to work it tbh!

    • @douglasladowski6342
      @douglasladowski6342 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Let your passion and love of the subject guide you.

  • @jaisbr
    @jaisbr 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    I appreciate the disclosure, wish all TH-camrs were this honest.

  • @CleverSmart123
    @CleverSmart123 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    It's a great watch, just keep in mind the sometimes lacking quality control. Just check out the Christopher Ward Forum

  • @normanpedersen5454
    @normanpedersen5454 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I have the thin Malvern 2 hander - CW is amazing! One of my favorite brands!
    And I like the logo :)

  • @realestwatchreviews
    @realestwatchreviews 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Captain Cook comes close. Ginault is probably the best finish quality (minus rep controversy) I would go with a Monta Ocean King 2 in blue if I was spending up to $2k

  • @FALLERModellbau
    @FALLERModellbau 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great review, Jody! I just can't seem to warm up to Christopher Ward. The double branding at 12 and 9 instantly kills it for me. Other than that, it's a very handsome piece and the specs are great so I can see why people like it. Personally, I'll take an Oris over that any day of the week.

  • @THE_Newt
    @THE_Newt 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    I’ve heard some real negatives on Christopher Ward taking months to research/fix (or not fix) watches with warranty issues just a few months after purchase. I’ve also heard they’re awful to work with from a Customer Service perspective on warranty issues. Hope you don’t run across these issues, nice job on the review!

  • @duncanbryson1167
    @duncanbryson1167 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Surprised at the comments re current "Christopher Ward". Each to their own but I prefer it to previous abbreviated "Chris". I bought a C5 Malvern on what I call a chain mail (Milanese) bracelet. So far, very happy with it and it's been admired. The downloaded images look white but it's champagne. I actually prefer it to white. Have mentioned this to the company.

  • @UncleSkiBum
    @UncleSkiBum 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Just got a C60 Sapphire orange from by buddies for my 40th bday and it's amazing. it's my first Swiss movement and its lovely.

  • @jtee9548
    @jtee9548 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    That was a good observation, the problem with the lack of half links.

  • @Bob.martens
    @Bob.martens 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    For a grand you should, after some looking around, be able to find the automatic Longines Hydroconquest. If you don't know it: check it out, it's gorgeous. 41mm, Ceramic, 64 hours power reserve in-house (eta-based i think though) movement. Very nice bracelet and clasp...

    • @LLSicilia
      @LLSicilia 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yeh thats a nice watch, had my eye on it but fell in love with the tissot seastar 1000 with blue graduated dial. $700 street price. Powermatic 80 has almost quartz accuracy. Though do concede longines as a brand does evoke more prestige

    • @Bob.martens
      @Bob.martens 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@LLSicilia that Tissot is indeed a beauty, and as a make it is underrated, but it will never be a Longines:)

  • @VersedNJ
    @VersedNJ 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    The al black looks outstanding, also liked the black dial with red bezel.

  • @markgill8444
    @markgill8444 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    I have exactly the same problem with the bracelet and several of us brought it up with Christopher Ward at the Manchester get together. For some people it works fine, but if your wrist size is in between links then you're either using the clasp fully open or closed depending on how many links you have. A half link would certainly solve that.

  • @HarryBunnGRVOTV
    @HarryBunnGRVOTV 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    If they did away with the name on the left I would definitely consider it. They should trust there branding logo, which by itself is quite cool.

  • @als1440
    @als1440 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    The watch checked all the boxes but I sold my Christopher Ward (like this in black). Had issues with the watch vibrating when wound. I then had issues with customer care. They told me the watch was fine even though it vibrated- that's not normal. You can check some videos (I located one on facebook) showing the vibrating issues.. I would agree it's a nice watch but for the price there were too many issues. I also liked the 5 year warranty. But check the warranty notes. You have to send it back around 2-3 years for service otherwise the warranty is basically voided and the repair is out of pocket.

  • @KCWeapon
    @KCWeapon 5 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    CW is very high on my list of watches to own. I love the “stealth” logo or whatever.
    The full name Christopher Ward never really bothered me until just now...the way you pointed it out. Another mans name on my wrist🤔 Awwww Helll Nahhh. Now I can’t unsee it 🤣

    • @junwoojang2941
      @junwoojang2941 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Raymond Weil, Hamilton, Dan Henry. They're proudly displaying the name of the owner of the birth of these watches. Wearing one, I personally don't think that's anything to be ashamed of.

    • @junwoojang2941
      @junwoojang2941 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Even Breitling, Bell & Ross, Bremont are all names as well, so I agree. That's nothing to be snobbish about

    • @WuBloodKin09
      @WuBloodKin09 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Junwoo Jang Yeah well...you can have all the Calvin Klein’s, Daniel Wellington’s, San Martin’s, Richard Lagrange’s etc. more for you with different aliases on your wrist, only problem is, which ID bracelet are you gonna put on everyday?!

  • @garyvowles23
    @garyvowles23 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    It is a lovely looking watch. I ordered one 3 weeks ago but sent it back as the bezel rattled and had a lot of slop in the movement. I sent it back to be told it was within their tolerances. Great watch but beware as there seems to be a few quality issues with this new model. previous models I own are excellent.

  • @mtmatt6111
    @mtmatt6111 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    While a nice piece of engineering, the 600 meter certification is completely overkill and makes the watch unnecessarily thick. People with an open water certification dive no more than 20 meters. It starts to get pretty dark after that. An advanced open water certification will get you to 30 meters. A 100 meter watch is more than is really necessary and would slim down the watch. Most people buying the watch probably don't dive anyway.

  • @vargusalex
    @vargusalex 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Great looking watch and overall value. But the logo position is just weird to me. It makes the watch look cheap.

  • @earthenjadis8199
    @earthenjadis8199 5 ปีที่แล้ว +78

    The '"Christopher Ward" on the dial of almost all their watches, in terms of positioning, font and presence, is what turns me off the brand. Looks so amateurish. Change it to "CW" and give it a spiffy logo that doesn't look like a QR code and that would fix the problem.

    • @michaellangmdl
      @michaellangmdl ปีที่แล้ว

      Completely agree. Please change the font.

    • @JustOneMoreWatch
      @JustOneMoreWatch  ปีที่แล้ว

      They did. Eventually

    • @earthenjadis8199
      @earthenjadis8199 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@JustOneMoreWatch You go back and read old comments in your spare time?

  • @braunshock6112
    @braunshock6112 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    I have a number of CW watches and the build quality and value is fantastic.

  • @longbush
    @longbush 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    I have one of the original Tridents in 38mm, one of my favourite watches for sure and gets plenty of wrist time (and it's up against a Rolex, an Omega, Oris and a Tudor). Quality and accuracy are excellent. I have just ordered the new 38mm version of the C65 on the steel bracelet, but I ummed and aahed over this one before deciding.

  • @paulhart2021
    @paulhart2021 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I got to tell you for me I can get over those couple of nags.... That's a gorgeous watch and I actually really don't mind the way they designed it or where they put their name. Who says all the watches should look exactly the same anyway right?

  • @guilhermeveroneze3600
    @guilhermeveroneze3600 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Tissot Seastar is a nice alternative also.

  • @Zeratsu
    @Zeratsu 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    "to wear other man's name on your wrist" made me smile ) that chamfered edges on the indices are somewhat unique and i like it. You deserved a nice watch.
    P. S. at around $1000-1500 price range i wanna suggest Longines Hydroconquest new version. What do you think?

    • @josephcastillo6742
      @josephcastillo6742 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      I don’t understand why people are suggesting the longines as an alternative. It’s a plain watch with a generic bracelet and clasp. Same price range, nowhere near the same quality

    • @Zeratsu
      @Zeratsu 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@josephcastillo6742 new version of Hydroconquest has become even better, it has a proper milled bracelet to my eye.

  • @matttheoneonly6617
    @matttheoneonly6617 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I just ordered the older "vintage" 38mm version of this for $370 from Christopher ward

  • @ivankerr3570
    @ivankerr3570 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    There is a half link at the other strap end . Easy to use it

  • @alexandrupara4574
    @alexandrupara4574 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    How come no one is complaining about Patek Philippe? After all there are 2 guys name on that watch dial (Antoni Patek and Adrien Philippe)

  • @leocullen1224
    @leocullen1224 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Was just watching bark and Jack when this popped up in my feed. Fantastic review, really keen to pick up the gmt!

  • @Chopperdriver
    @Chopperdriver 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    I’m very close to pulling the trigger on the CW COSC version off the trident. I already own a Malvern. Very underrated brand imo.