2022 Mercedes eSprinter in-depth review | Edd China | What Car?

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 4 ส.ค. 2024
  • #whatcar #eddchina #mercedesesprinter
    Immensely capable and comfortable - is the Mercedes eSprinter the best electric van yet?
    Save thousands on your next new car with What Car? at www.whatcar.com/new-car-deals/
    New videos are uploaded to What Car? each week. Don't miss a single one. Subscribe now: bit.ly/2Obgxjd
    Visit our website at www.whatcar.com/
    What Car? is the UK's biggest car-buying brand and has been helping Britain's car buyers make purchasing decisions for more than 40 years. Our tests are widely regarded as the most trusted source of new car advice.
    This channel brings you trusted reviews on all the new models on the market, all the latest first drives, reader reviews, and great car-buying advice.
    All reviews are available in full online at Whatcar.com - the UK's leading car-buying website, offering trusted reviews and data on every new car. The website also offers advice on car leasing, new car deals and new and used cars for sale.
    Follow What Car? here:
    LIKE What Car? on Facebook: goo.gl/yv5jF8
    FOLLOW What Car? on Twitter: goo.gl/SJzmT8
    Check out our full video catalog: bit.ly/2W81iu9
    Video chapters:
    0:00 Intro
    1:18 Electric features
    2:03 Batteries and charging
    3:14 Load area
    3:45 Trims and interior
    4:20 Driving and performance
    5:50 Drive modes
    6:24 Safety equipment
    6:42 Summary and outro
  • ยานยนต์และพาหนะ

ความคิดเห็น • 143

  • @danieljordannicol9937
    @danieljordannicol9937 3 ปีที่แล้ว +96

    I'd have to be off my rocking horse to spend 62k on a van that does 90 miles 😂

    • @hmm2928
      @hmm2928 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Exactly
      Lol

    • @markwilliams5654
      @markwilliams5654 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      You would have to be crazy to pay 80% tax on diesel well this is a fascist country

    • @mauriceetal1426
      @mauriceetal1426 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      How much driving do you guys do? I am an Uber driver and I am going to have to sit you down to tell you to enjoy life and stop driving, yw

    • @mauriceetal1426
      @mauriceetal1426 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      There are chargers, like pumps everywhere, unless you live in the boons

    • @mauriceetal1426
      @mauriceetal1426 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Some free

  • @corriesutton8720
    @corriesutton8720 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Great review! If Edd can convince us to buy this then I would say he’d make a better car salesman than Mike ever was!
    Who would vote for Edd to host a new series of top gear? I would... ✋

  • @Jonc25
    @Jonc25 3 ปีที่แล้ว +24

    I would have to charge this 5 times in one day. 😄

    • @Milo19970
      @Milo19970 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      And if you don't have a fast charger nearby it would take you 7 days to charge at home just to drive 2 hours!😂😂Mercedes should be ashamed of themselves. Almost no one that needs a van drives such short distances. What a waste that precious lithium could be used for something else.

    • @captainblake2583
      @captainblake2583 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      When you think about it though, these vans, are meant more for city work, than anywhere else, where range really isn’t an issue.
      Just look at the new London Taxis, they don’t have a huge range either, yet that’s not an issue in London. 👍

  • @frcgfd107
    @frcgfd107 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    They have some work to do to get e-vans more mainstream, great review. Thanks Edd!

  • @Wotan-ke5ow
    @Wotan-ke5ow 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    I need a new Van for my business and I would love to buy electric for sustainability but this review just confirms to me that the battery technology is not yet there to make it a good business decision. I’ll wait a year or so to invest in a van that can do 250km

    • @BoskiM
      @BoskiM 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Just buy diesel or even petrol for a smaller van

  • @stuartrance277
    @stuartrance277 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Good review, have you or are you going to do a review of the Peugeot boxer ?????

  • @deco1976
    @deco1976 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Electric is not there yet . That range is the killer. Until ranges get up to 500 miles, that’s the game changer.

  • @cannygrowabeard
    @cannygrowabeard 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    We had compliance cars, and now we are going to have compliance vans like this haha. Peugeot launching Boxer electric van in 2021 with a range (quoted) over 200mi. Seems like a more attractive proposition. I want to see Kia/Hyundai stretch the skateboard EV platform and see if they can get it to suit a large van.

  • @panathaninf
    @panathaninf 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    70-96 miles range... high maintenance cost car... you need an extremely good health insurance to cover for the range anxiety long term health issues

  • @gtm559
    @gtm559 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    So 90m 144km. One normal route 400km you need almost 4 charging. 1 h each fast charging 4 h to charge plus 4h drive. Perfect 8h whole day for 400km.wao big success

    • @unclsam6798
      @unclsam6798 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      For using inside towns, it will be more than enough

  • @TheAlien1974
    @TheAlien1974 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Can just see it now, builder's pinching electricity from your house as they work

  • @citycareletrica1900
    @citycareletrica1900 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Edd China, você é o melhor. ✌

  • @bid84
    @bid84 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Hang on so a diesel van might do 40mpg on a motorway, that’s roughly 2.2 gallons of diesel to do 90 miles, how much is that? Around €13
    To charge this electric van will cost more than that.

  • @kwmlin02
    @kwmlin02 ปีที่แล้ว

    How is the music sound in E Sprinter? Does it have good sound system? How is the noise insulation? Can you compare it to gas Sprinter? Is there Apple CarPlay? Thanks

  • @firecreepergaming
    @firecreepergaming 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    60K for a van with an Interior less Equipped then a Dacia, I think not

  • @kingoneeyed3433
    @kingoneeyed3433 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    "So what do you need most, miles or moving"? How about both Ed.

  • @JohnDoe-xm9ql
    @JohnDoe-xm9ql 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Nice video Ed...

  • @panathaninf
    @panathaninf 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Can we please also have metric numbers in display when you mention non metric values?

  • @KillilaghChurch12
    @KillilaghChurch12 3 ปีที่แล้ว +20

    If a diesel van had a range of 90 miles it wouldn’t sell . They need to get real with EV’s and not just pay lip service and lower carbon footprint as a brand

    • @archechme
      @archechme 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      It is unimpressive but for nipping about doing short runs it'd be fine ie in london

  • @DaveDVideoMaker
    @DaveDVideoMaker 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    It is low on features for an electric van, but it’s not as bad as some of the classics. It does for example have that USB-C port, so it gets a 3/10.

  • @farmerlamb2372
    @farmerlamb2372 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Most couriers are 75 miles away from me, so I won't see UPS, DPD or Parcelforce turning up in one of these anytime soon then.

    • @sirkermy450
      @sirkermy450 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Amazon, Ocado and Morrisons already had them before you made this comment

    • @farmerlamb2372
      @farmerlamb2372 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@sirkermy450 and?

  • @MasticinaAkicta
    @MasticinaAkicta 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    So this is the choice for London?

  • @boxingfan2281
    @boxingfan2281 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    It’s been designed and priced exclusively for business ownership and the various tax benefits. I do struggle with it being affordable as a second hand +100k miles van with the limited range though. Is it any good in 5 years time when it’s got high miles and affordable for a normal builder to own....with that range?

    • @borisjohnson7553
      @borisjohnson7553 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      It’s only been designed for Amazon because Amazon is pledging to have an electric fleet of vans and Mercedes have got the contract to provide the vans so that’s the only reason why it’s been built

    • @boxingfan2281
      @boxingfan2281 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@borisjohnson7553 makes sense.

  • @lawrenceiley7686
    @lawrenceiley7686 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    What happened to metric,km.pls.

    • @xanpagebrown
      @xanpagebrown 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      here's a hint: its an English channel, filmed in England and intended for a UK audience... we don't use metric for large measurements of distance

  • @rhy.recepyildiz
    @rhy.recepyildiz 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    transit and sprinter my favorite

  • @AerialDP
    @AerialDP 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Why don’t they have solar panel roofs ?

  • @0OMG
    @0OMG ปีที่แล้ว

    Why does it have a rear view mirror?

  • @Timeculture
    @Timeculture 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Good one, we want more broll

  • @secpac58chichi
    @secpac58chichi 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    hey Ed you should weld some fender flairs on it - LOL

  • @bonnie159
    @bonnie159 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Why doesn’t it have a screen in it like the diesels

  • @stewreviews9345
    @stewreviews9345 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I get that they're looking for customers who need only short distances but it's a shame about the range.
    I'm sure there will be a lot of folk wanting an EV camper who would otherwise see this as their perfect vehicle.
    I guess that with fast charging it is just about viable but really you'd want about double that...

  • @DMcC_pool
    @DMcC_pool 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I really don’t know what the point is of all these vans that won’t even do 100 miles. Who are they for! Nice try with the sell though Ed, I’ll admit you gave it a good shot at trying to be enthusiastic!

    • @philiplee7604
      @philiplee7604 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      As the saying goes. ..” a fool and their money are easily parted”

    • @CJMVector321190
      @CJMVector321190 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Even my wife's florist business which could use this as all local miles, then you look are the start price, still no.

  • @jimcree6869
    @jimcree6869 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    That don't do 90 miles. They tested it and they do approx 100 KLM ie 62 miles . That's brand new battery . After a few years that will drop massively

  • @TEACHER0786
    @TEACHER0786 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Awesome ❤

  • @AkaAndyKnuckles
    @AkaAndyKnuckles 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    No Android Auto and no screen. They must be kidding.

  • @matthewadams-richardson6980
    @matthewadams-richardson6980 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    That range is hugely disappointing. If it had a range of 400 or 500 KM, I would totally consider one for the purposes of a camper (even at the price listed) but 96 miles is just disappointing and even for town purposes is not super ideal.

  • @martynGB
    @martynGB ปีที่แล้ว +1

    If you turn on AC or especially the heater in Van with a payload door the range is pitiful, about 40-45 miles

  • @mattrussell250
    @mattrussell250 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    But could it survive Rufford Ford?

  • @Milo19970
    @Milo19970 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    If Tesla can make a battery pack on a tiny car in comparison (Tesla Model 3) that can go for about 220/310 miles, than Mercedes should absolutely be able to make an even larger battery pack on a giant car such as the sprinter! Would love to have an electric Esprinter but this 90 miles sprinter is a total waste of money and time I guess I'll wait for a couple of years until they take it seriously.

  • @oliplaysbass
    @oliplaysbass 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I hire vans for gigs to travel filled with music gear and 2 other people. Most gigs are 100+ miles away. If they gave me one of these I’d be giving a big WTF

  • @MrGurujohnny
    @MrGurujohnny 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Will buy when they get to 500miles range

  • @markplumber3635
    @markplumber3635 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Wouldn’t consider it in the high,ands due to range

  • @saulvillicana292
    @saulvillicana292 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    If they could make this a hybrid, it would be fantastic!

  • @sirkermy450
    @sirkermy450 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Cross wind assist is great until you're the one driving. There's no warning, it just decides to make one side of the van brake and scares the sh*t out of you.

  • @pylofm
    @pylofm 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Would be nice if these reviews actually 'reviewed' them in realistic scenarios I.e load it up and drive it not just regurgitate makers specs.

  • @daspecialist1220
    @daspecialist1220 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Someones attempt to get rid of old battery tech most likely. When will we live in a world where engineers actually think things through and make products that make sense...? Im genuinely asking...

  • @USUG0
    @USUG0 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    There is no justification for an EV van, or any vehicle, to cost more than 200£ (or indeed, 150) per kWh of battery, as compared to a diesel one.

  • @fennecno.6693
    @fennecno.6693 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    original diesel weight 9000lbs! too much weight! may need think about to reduce weigh as the same time double or triple the battery set

  • @philiplee7604
    @philiplee7604 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    The Channel is called “ WHAT CAR” not “ WHAT VAN”

  • @andreipop1
    @andreipop1 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    It's a van, loads of space to put battery under the load area and Mercedes give you under 100 miles? Makes no sense.

  • @cemunal4077
    @cemunal4077 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    E vans super.

  • @5123rick
    @5123rick 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    this is 2021 and people are getting moist about a Electric van that can do 90 miles . Seriously wtf

  • @user-hs9hy6vh7q
    @user-hs9hy6vh7q 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Have to over 500km range

  • @MOSSFEEN
    @MOSSFEEN 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I gave up watching this video when he said it will do less than 100 miles per charge FFS DIESEL IS KING

  • @thegoodnotbadorugly
    @thegoodnotbadorugly 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Edd's talents are wasted on reviewing vans.

    • @philiplee7604
      @philiplee7604 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Agree!... It’s a crying shame, but so often in life, the “ higher you fly the harder you fall” too often egos are the ruin of many a man.

  • @rommich2724
    @rommich2724 ปีที่แล้ว

    This is not a review
    This is just reading/memorising the data sheet.
    I have seen a few reviews that Ed has done on vans but, never has he mentioned something that he really felt. Being a mechanic or putting himself in the tradesman’s shoes, one would expect a more pov review (real time)
    Simply disappointing, but that is my opinion and that’s what matters to me.

  • @3DPeter
    @3DPeter ปีที่แล้ว

    96 mile range on one charge. Well, that sucks then because taht is on a full charge, and a quick charge is only 80% so that's 77 miles extra, and from there
    you need to quick charge every 77 miles. And forget about pulling a 3 ton trailer, because that will set you back at least 30% in range if not way more.
    So there you go, take a 30 minute rest after every 45 miles with a trailer. Hell, electric vans have a long way to go before they can get a desent range with also a 3 ton trailer.

  • @dan19752008
    @dan19752008 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I would rather spend 62k on a flat and rent it out.

  • @bernardcharlesworth9860
    @bernardcharlesworth9860 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I think I keep my Peugeot electric at 186miles

  • @ricksworlddereaux2397
    @ricksworlddereaux2397 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    They need atleast a 90kwh Batterie installed,under full.load they just last 60mph i bet on a charge,so they will not sell for shure with that low range and only short bed option. so i keep my diesel 2014 sprinter for now.🤔👎

  • @PlatinumDiscos
    @PlatinumDiscos 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I wouldn’t buy this with such a limited range! Once electric vehicles do 300+ miles I’ll think about it, but not until then! Price is ridiculous!

  • @tarix55
    @tarix55 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Someone at Mercedes needs kicking !!

  • @ubermenschen3636
    @ubermenschen3636 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    @2:32, “ With [faster charger], suddenly that 96 range doesn’t seem so limiting.” This guy is disingenuous. After battery degradation (5%), heating/cooling (10%), and range anxiety(15%), battery temperature related inefficiency (5%), your Sprinter EV has the real world range of : 96 * 0.65 = 62.4 miles without considering carrying a heavy load climbing a 5% grade. Essentially, this EV Van is good for one service call per day, with a round trip of 65 miles. You can’t earn enough money doing one service call per day with any work truck. Mercedes is ripping you off - its marketing plan is selling you a 100 kWh battery as replacement, soon to be followed by 150 and 200 kWh battery. Thus, this is the equivalent to the number game that Mercedes play on consumer

  • @jedoka
    @jedoka 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Obviously designed for Amazon deliveries

  • @jackmillin
    @jackmillin 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    There's no way that vans viable to any company. The range is literally useless and by the price tag is eye watering. I suppose company's have to start somewhere and this is just the beginning really.

  • @markwilliams5654
    @markwilliams5654 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    A panel Van with a 55kwh battery for 62k what a rip off lithium batterys are not expensive 100$ a kWh don't buy needs at least 100kwh battery

    • @samf8074
      @samf8074 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thats not how it works😂

  • @viscountorganswales5334
    @viscountorganswales5334 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    This is what happens when your out of work and you sell your soul and integrity to make the bills. Oh dear Ed what have you done?

  • @smithyc2051
    @smithyc2051 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    62 grand??? LMFAO

  • @dehnusnorder3789
    @dehnusnorder3789 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    For all the whiners: This is more a car for hauling people in cities like, a bus in an inner city. It's not for you, handymen, that drive in excess of 200 miles a day.

  • @felix_five
    @felix_five 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Made in V’China

  • @akhusal
    @akhusal 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Tesla should make vans.

  • @FredlocksAsher2012
    @FredlocksAsher2012 ปีที่แล้ว

    Mercedes lost me at less thank 100 miles range,.. lol i'll wait for my cyber truck sorry lol

  • @notmenotme614
    @notmenotme614 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    That interior looks awful, like something from the 1980s. For a £60,000 van I’m amazed it doesn’t even have a built in sat nav screen and radio + cruise control buttons on the steering wheel.

  • @chappy2121
    @chappy2121 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Jesus, that interior is spartan. I've seen more creature comforts in a tent, and at the price they want.....

  • @Mr.Carter777
    @Mr.Carter777 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    The range is reflection. How Mercedes is behind and out of touch.

  • @olivhay4929
    @olivhay4929 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Poor edd.. 😞

    • @danieljordannicol9937
      @danieljordannicol9937 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Why?

    • @airjaff
      @airjaff 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@danieljordannicol9937 Left a top show, everyone thinking he would do something big, and now he's on a mediocre youtube channel!

    • @corriesutton8720
      @corriesutton8720 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Watch this space! Talent doesn’t go unnoticed for long! It was only a TOP show because Edd was in it...

  • @daspecialist1220
    @daspecialist1220 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    96mile range... smh

  • @adrianos3235
    @adrianos3235 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    62000£ !!!!!!

  • @biguprochester
    @biguprochester 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    You lost me at 75 mph

  • @AkaAndyKnuckles
    @AkaAndyKnuckles 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Highly unimpressive.

  • @questionyourbeliefs
    @questionyourbeliefs 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Under 100 miles of range? WTF... That is weak.

    • @questionyourbeliefs
      @questionyourbeliefs 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Go anywhere far and you need to double your travel time just from stopping and charging.

  • @Jonnorrisphotography
    @Jonnorrisphotography 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Lmaooo. 70-96 miles of charger. Yeah that’s a big no 😂

  • @huss1205
    @huss1205 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Running the diesel version is by faaaaaar cheaper over the long run if you say that the battery version costs the double. You have to be the dumbest guy out there to buy this crappy van...

  • @suzylawrence6
    @suzylawrence6 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    £60K+.. now £16k plus vat .. the EV Scam continues.

  • @CruzeUK
    @CruzeUK 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Laughable. Fine for last mile work, just, but anything else, useless. I'll stick to my 316 - 1100kg payload, 600 miles range and 5 mins to refuel and 120mph where allowed.

  • @radiocrash
    @radiocrash 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    They will lose big money on these.

  • @Ellotrades
    @Ellotrades 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Investing in crypto now should be in every wise individuals list, in some months time you'll be ecstatic with the decision you made today.

    • @harzardfreeman3058
      @harzardfreeman3058 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Most intelligent words I've heard.

    • @MikeSmith-uy6fd
      @MikeSmith-uy6fd 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I wanted to trade Crypto but got discouraged by the fluctuations in price

    • @juster1269
      @juster1269 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @prosper Yeah, My first investment with Mr Logan Wayne earned me profit of over $25,530 US dollars, and ever since then he has been delivering

  • @samf8074
    @samf8074 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This proves that electric vehicle's are probbaly the dumbest solution possible, why is no one talking about hydrogen! Hydrogen makes sense, electric doesn't

    • @SquareoftheyearFM
      @SquareoftheyearFM 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Because it’s much more costly, less efficient and has nowhere near the levels of infrastructure.

    • @samf8074
      @samf8074 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@SquareoftheyearFM what hydrogen?😂you have to change everything about a road network to accommodate electric vehicles and the consumer gets a substandard product that is only capable of minimal mileage before you need to stop for 40 mins to charge a vehicle.

    • @SquareoftheyearFM
      @SquareoftheyearFM 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@samf8074 Electricity is everywhere, slow chargers cost next to nothing, fast chargers cost up to 50 grand but are getting cheaper and there are more of them than petrol stations already. Van ranges are poor but the new cars coming to market tend to have pretty decent ranges now.
      I've just checked, of the twelve hydrogen filling stations in the UK, four are showing as out of order.

    • @samf8074
      @samf8074 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@SquareoftheyearFM yes slow charges are cheap, that’s why nobody uses them and is partly the reason why PHEV vehicles are thought to be worse than a standard conventional engine regarding c02. Fast charging isn’t all too fast in reality when compared to fuelling a vehicle which is where it needs to be. You also have the issue where a high proportion of individuals will not be able to charge their vehicles overnight due to living in houses with street parking, which most people do. And yes a Tesla will offer a decent range of 270 (real world driving) which still isn’t great considering I have to wait 40 mins for my vehicle to charge. However most will never be able to buy a Tesla as they start from roughly 40,000 pounds. Yes there’s lots of electricity but no where near enough to fuel a whole country. So tell me if I live in a house with street parking where do I charge my vehicle overnight?
      And yes of course that is the case in the uk at the moment because there is enough demand for hydrogen, it’s not that the pumps are unreliable it’s that there is no need to fuel them.
      Electric vehicles are in my opinion the worst possible solution to creating green vehicles as they do not meet the demands or needs of car uses. T

    • @SquareoftheyearFM
      @SquareoftheyearFM 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@samf8074 40% of households don't have off-street parking not 'most'.
      The average journey is something around 30miles a day meaning most people would need to charge once every week with something like the electric corsa. You could perhaps charge at one of many public chargers once a week. Supermarkets are even installing them now. Imagine what that'll be like in ten years time when almost every car park has chargers in.
      The National Grid have already said a few times now that there is enough electricity. Local distribution might be an issue in areas but vehicle to grid systems will actually help out the grid and might reduce our need for fast reaction power stations.
      Hydrogen is produced from fossil fuels currently and the stations are out of order because hydrogen is really hard to store and massively corrosive to tanks. Also yes a car can 'refill' quicker on hydrogen but only the first few cars. Hydrogen charging stations can usually only charge a certain number of cars a day as they have to recharge their tanks.
      Electric doesn't work for everyone right now, there's always going to be the unicorn who drives four hundred miles and doesn't need to pee or has to get somewhere without stopping for half hour but the problem with using them as the example means the people who could transition get put off.
      Hydrogen might be fine for some applications but increasingly BEV's are filling the void.

  • @stevenprestwich521
    @stevenprestwich521 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    That van is a joke, big batteries 90 miles and small batteries 70 miles, so loaded and cold weather small batteries be down to say 40 miles full charge, i've heard people going charging them and travelling 25 miles away to a charger, so it £60k for more or less an unusable van, i have a 70 plate Mercedes sprinter diesel and i wouldn't want that electric van even if they offered me a straight swap

  • @andrewlee4938
    @andrewlee4938 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Absolutely terrible. Just way to expensive and way to limited in terms of practical use. What is Ed doing !!!???

  • @thewanderingbox8253
    @thewanderingbox8253 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Blimey. Rubbish. Get a diesel van

  • @mauriceetal1426
    @mauriceetal1426 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I saw this on TFL being tested in USA, they should build this in the South Carolina plant, I won't be buying a Mexican or Chinese Mercedes

  • @Starfishtroopers
    @Starfishtroopers 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    useless and overpriced.

  • @cannygrowabeard
    @cannygrowabeard 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    We had compliance cars, and now we are going to have compliance vans like this haha. Peugeot launching Boxer electric van in 2021 with a range (quoted) over 200mi. Seems like a more attractive proposition. I want to see Kia/Hyundai stretch the skateboard EV platform and see if they can get it to suit a large van.