Why are TV Cameras still HUGE and expensive ?

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 22 พ.ค. 2024
  • Follow Zebra Zone on Instagram ! / zebrazone.mov
    Follow Zebra Zone on Twitter ! / zebrazonetv
    Let's understand why in 2019 TV cameras are still so massive and expensive ! I rented a complete TV setup to have a week-end of experimentation messing around with the beast. Part of the equipment was not available at the rental house so Blackmagic nicely agreed to lend me the camera, fiber module, monitor and a camera control panel for a few days.
    Special thanks to Claire (Broadcast Camera Op), Marin (Camera Assistant), Matthieu (Paraglider) and Mathieu (Actor) for helping me out with strong commitment throughout this project.
    Broll shot with BMPCC4K mostly Lumix 42.5mm + Laowa 7.5mm, edited in Da Vinci Resolve. Graphic animations in After Effects.
    Rental House : Video Plus France
    TV Camera : Blackmagic Ursa Broadcast
    Fujinon UA107
    Vinten Vector 950
    Time Markers :
    0:00 - Intro
    1:31 - The Lens
    5:04 - The Tripod
    6:16 - The Monitor
    6:56 - Remotes
    7:30 - Camera
    8:38 - Conclusion
    _______________________________________
    Follow Zebra Zone for more content !
    ► Instagram : / zebrazone.mov
    ► Twitter : / zebrazonetv
    ► Website : zebrazone.tv
    _______________________________________
    #Broadcast #TV #Camera #Fujinon #Blackmagicdesign #URSABroadcast #gear #dop #liveproduction #shoot #television #vinten
  • วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี

ความคิดเห็น • 14K

  • @Noah-fx4cm
    @Noah-fx4cm 4 ปีที่แล้ว +12282

    When you're filming a muscle car but realise your camera is more expensive

    • @cristi724
      @cristi724 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1337

      Imagine someone drifting a Lambo and smashes a camera like this. Pulls out his wallet and asks how much for a new one...
      I'll take the car thank you!

    • @Douken
      @Douken 4 ปีที่แล้ว +74

      Until you film the ultimate muscle car. The Equus Bass 770

    • @CloudHugger79
      @CloudHugger79 4 ปีที่แล้ว +187

      @@Douken Until the ultimate muscle car get filmed by the ultimate camera

    • @walknotes
      @walknotes 4 ปีที่แล้ว +40

      @@Douken from moon distance.. again, camera much more expensive..

    • @chrisw5742
      @chrisw5742 4 ปีที่แล้ว +37

      Film the camera with a mirror :-P

  • @idkwuisp7626
    @idkwuisp7626 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8846

    TV camera: $250,000 extreme high tech alien technology
    TV broadcast: 480p

    • @uniqhnd23
      @uniqhnd23 4 ปีที่แล้ว +219

      Hahahaha

    • @davidc756
      @davidc756 4 ปีที่แล้ว +315

      Real talk

    • @CrysisVN
      @CrysisVN 4 ปีที่แล้ว +169

      SO TRUE

    • @AhmadKawaArif
      @AhmadKawaArif 4 ปีที่แล้ว +100

      extremely true.

    • @rosemariesabido907
      @rosemariesabido907 4 ปีที่แล้ว +91

      So true here in the Philippines

  • @LucasSantanaLopes
    @LucasSantanaLopes ปีที่แล้ว +717

    I'm a helicopter broadcast camera operator for years and this video opened my mind about why the hell it's so expensive.. yea, aviation makes the prices go even higher (3x higher in my case) since it has ultra gimbal stabilization included, imagine all this zoom without shaking even with helicopter making turns, wind speed changing, rain, etc. And it being steady just like a high end tripod

    • @Excludos
      @Excludos ปีที่แล้ว +25

      Just out of curiosity, does helicopter gimbals still use enormous gyroscopes for stabilization, or have you all moved over to motorized gimbals like drones use?

    • @LucasSantanaLopes
      @LucasSantanaLopes ปีที่แล้ว +57

      @@Excludos at least the one I operate has 5-axis gyro + stabilization w/ laser feedback (same laser tech used in missiles), so it won't lose calibration while in use

    • @gabesolomon4887
      @gabesolomon4887 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      @@LucasSantanaLopes Holy moley those things are gimbals? I always thought they were just a motorized base and yoke like a moving head light. How are they so much more compact in design than marine gimbals?

    • @SmallSpoonBrigade
      @SmallSpoonBrigade ปีที่แล้ว +13

      Yes, and keep in mind that the market for those cameras is also tiny. A major metropolitan area probably has fewer than a dozen news channels buying them.

    • @EdgeloopAcademy
      @EdgeloopAcademy 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      that was absolutely fascinating to read! thank you for sharing.

  • @thejman3489
    @thejman3489 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +44

    In auto racing they can film cars going 150mph, slow down the video, and it's so clear you can read the words on the tire. I remember seeing that one time and thinking that's why the cameras cost so much. That's just incredible.

    • @themisir
      @themisir หลายเดือนก่อน

      Technically that’s possible with other cameras as well. You will need to use faster shutter speed to get sharp photos of fast moving objects and big aperture with good sensor to account for the lost light.

    • @SupaSwope
      @SupaSwope 28 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@themisir right like he said you can do that. But also can not switch between a bunch of different quicksettings and broadcast fiberopticly

  • @enotbert
    @enotbert 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3161

    It's unbelievable you rent all that gear just to make the video series! Dude this is the dedication I admire. Huge respect.

    • @zebrazone
      @zebrazone  4 ปีที่แล้ว +333

      Thank you man !!

    • @sbhgaming1196
      @sbhgaming1196 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      Why is there only 1 comment ?

    • @artheoxdotexe
      @artheoxdotexe 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@sbhgaming1196 idk, who knows?

    • @Eswarr
      @Eswarr 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      He owns them

    • @enotbert
      @enotbert 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@Eswarr Even so, by my standards, it is an achievement to have such equipment.

  • @Retipster
    @Retipster 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5751

    This answered so many questions I didn’t even know I had.

    • @shimeih2287
      @shimeih2287 4 ปีที่แล้ว +37

      Same

    • @computerjantje
      @computerjantje 4 ปีที่แล้ว +26

      exactly LOL

    • @g0mium
      @g0mium 4 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      Raised them then answered right after hahaha

    • @rayray29899
      @rayray29899 4 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      Lol bruh you are thinking the same as me!

    • @alvinfreeman8838
      @alvinfreeman8838 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      But I knew them. Pretty old knowledge.

  • @Pidrittel
    @Pidrittel ปีที่แล้ว +14

    Those episodes about the broadcast camera-lens-systems are so incredibly well produced, nice sounds, nice images, nice pacing, nice narration. Very well done, I really was tied to the screen!

  • @tristanbond8083
    @tristanbond8083 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Knowing very little about cameras, filming etc. wasn't enough to stop me from enjoying this video. Absolutely amazing and something that's enjoyable for all to watch

  • @aluisious
    @aluisious 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1078

    The moment you zoomed in on that girl in the field I understood why the lens is so expensive. Those are crazy good optics.

    • @tyroney2
      @tyroney2 4 ปีที่แล้ว +62

      aluisious I agree. It almost didn’t seem possible, the speed that the lens could go from wide to ultra telephoto (while perfectly maintaining focus), snapping back and forth like that... Live TV has such different requirements than narrative productions that can take a year to shoot.

    • @audiofiil
      @audiofiil 3 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      @@tyroney2 yea, that zooming in and out on that windsock, I was like "wait, that's impossible" lol

    • @coffeemakerbottomcracked
      @coffeemakerbottomcracked 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      rich perverts now know where to spend money on...

    • @TahtahmesDiary
      @TahtahmesDiary 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      @@coffeemakerbottomcracked Only a poor pervert would think like that.

    • @BlackEgypt
      @BlackEgypt 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Yea I understand the whole thing is better but A HOUSE tho? Really a whole HOUSE? FOR a lens?

  • @dhfghdesfgrdg6917
    @dhfghdesfgrdg6917 4 ปีที่แล้ว +35671

    Can we just appreciate the level of effort put into this video from a relatively smaller channel?

    • @sirlaunsloth
      @sirlaunsloth 4 ปีที่แล้ว +488

      As he talks about a camera, we keeps seeing sick zoom and pans and hearing well timed sfx

    • @dhfghdesfgrdg6917
      @dhfghdesfgrdg6917 4 ปีที่แล้ว +242

      Split Dimension I said relatively in reference to subscriber count

    • @grapy83
      @grapy83 4 ปีที่แล้ว +26

      Really appreciate that work. It's awesome

    • @anatollegros3454
      @anatollegros3454 4 ปีที่แล้ว +46

      @@plopalopadop2858 yeah, when i watched the vid i thought that it is a BIG chanel. then i saw this coment and i blew up

    • @anatollegros3454
      @anatollegros3454 4 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      he must have rich parents :)

  • @agguman
    @agguman 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    We need more humble content creators here on TH-cam like this guy.

  • @Inflightmuzik
    @Inflightmuzik ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Amazing video. Never knew I was curious about this, but you broke down everything clearly to where now I'm super excited about broadcast cameras. You look at them and you immediately think old/outdated (at least I did). Definitely flipped the script on me with this one. Great job man.

  • @gutenman7112
    @gutenman7112 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2715

    This gave me a whole new respect for cameraman in sports .

    • @GsusJack
      @GsusJack 4 ปีที่แล้ว +53

      Now you see they like a suggar daddy sitting in the most expensive muscle car?

    • @blinblinthing
      @blinblinthing 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Why does this comment not have more likes?

    • @GalileoAV
      @GalileoAV 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      And in the same kind of skill, spotlight operators in theater and live production.

    • @lottievixen
      @lottievixen 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@GalileoAV having done multiple parts of sound and lighting in school, i quickly realised spot is not as easy as it seems, its heavy and dang hot work without decent ventilation.

    • @MrRetsej
      @MrRetsej 4 ปีที่แล้ว +29

      As a former broadcast camera operator, thanks! This video does a great job of clearly explaining the kind of work I did and equipment used for over 20 years.

  • @JacobHillPGHVideo
    @JacobHillPGHVideo 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3783

    That looks more like a freaking missile launcher than a TV camera.

    • @kinez7069
      @kinez7069 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Martin-OnTheWeb you spelled it right.

    • @keineideeha7840
      @keineideeha7840 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Wtf... I had the exactly same thought

    • @mav01
      @mav01 4 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      That's why he named it "shooting" with a $250k camera setup

    • @shamux4043
      @shamux4043 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      You know what just disguise a missile launcher as one of those.

    • @Saifs_Here
      @Saifs_Here 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      heek yeah

  • @ryanpeiris
    @ryanpeiris ปีที่แล้ว +11

    The dedication and effort you have put in to making this super informative video is so amazing. I wish you all the best !!

  • @zaptineer
    @zaptineer 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    "Why is your camera so big and massive?"
    "Because it looks badass, ma'am."

  • @T33K3SS3LCH3N
    @T33K3SS3LCH3N 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1225

    Before the video: "Yeah, why the hell are they so expensive?"
    After the video: "Wow they're a bargain."

    • @57thorns
      @57thorns 4 ปีที่แล้ว +42

      After the lens part: "I understand why they cost so much".
      .....
      and then we have the camera, which has a bunch of features not available on anything else.

    • @Zamolxes77
      @Zamolxes77 4 ปีที่แล้ว +45

      @@57thorns I didn't knew the part about the buttons, but it makes sense, if you want certain setting tweaked like right NOW, you don't have time to navigate menus, just touch a button. I guess that's why cameraman is a job, not a hobby, you need lots of training to operate that thing.

    • @niroc
      @niroc 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Hahaha

    • @derekofbaltimore
      @derekofbaltimore 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      I know that's right, lol

    • @LouSaydus
      @LouSaydus 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      They're really not. the only part of the camera that is expensive or hard to manufacture is the Processing in the camera and the lenses. All of that other stuff is dirt cheap and common place in pretty much every industry.

  • @Katsoulinos
    @Katsoulinos 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1737

    As a professional camera operator myself, with 20 years of experience, I have to say that the info on this video is absolutely correct and up to date. Excellent camerawork, sound, directing and video editing also.

    • @stanp2281
      @stanp2281 4 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      It’s been a dream of mine for a while and I was wondering how you get into the business. I know so much about the production industry apart from where to start!

    • @kevinyu3863
      @kevinyu3863 4 ปีที่แล้ว +51

      Very professional profile pic

    • @bwanamtui7594
      @bwanamtui7594 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@kevinyu3863 ha ha

    • @pme023
      @pme023 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Just one thing. Where is the headset? :) Brilliant video, you have absolutely right.

    • @aerotman2003
      @aerotman2003 4 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      As a cinematographer, its impressive when it come down to convenience to manning the rig alone. Where I need to orchestrate a few people to achieve the same thing with a focus puller or someone racking the f-stops on my old arriflex set up. The thing i wonder is why the camera is still using 2/3? Is there disadvantage moving the camera to larger sensor and lens manufacturers?
      edit: also call me old fashion, but i never trust a servo lens or a lcd screen, I still bust out my light meter and measuring tape when I plan out accuracy which of course can't be done efficiently in broadcast

  • @shiromajo6263
    @shiromajo6263 ปีที่แล้ว +47

    as a tech enthusiast & gamer this just showed up on my recoms page never expected to understand anything at all but now I'm surprised it actually made sense and helped me understand why a broadcasting cameraman as a job is no joke if they make the slightest mistake it could cost the interest of the entire show to the said audience. great video Zebra Zone I hope more content creators like you to pop up in my recoms haha

    • @ncard00
      @ncard00 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Technology getting better isn't interesting. Technology getting cheaper is interesting.

    • @sk-sm9sh
      @sk-sm9sh หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@ncard00 lol that's some loser mentality talk you have here. The top of the line things will always be expensive.

  • @qproductionslasvegas123
    @qproductionslasvegas123 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Thank you so much for taking the time to make this video. Very informative and extremely well shot. Great job!

  • @vladan1079
    @vladan1079 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1557

    When a camera lens is more expensive than your house.

    • @KingOfHell94
      @KingOfHell94 4 ปีที่แล้ว +22

      when the camera lens costs 10 times more than your 5 room apartment LEL.

    • @matthewkuhl79
      @matthewkuhl79 4 ปีที่แล้ว +33

      You must not live in California 🙄

    • @KingOfHell94
      @KingOfHell94 4 ปีที่แล้ว +21

      @@matthewkuhl79 i dont live in USA :D

    • @SubZero-wz2ef
      @SubZero-wz2ef 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      i think this is for hollywood..

    • @meatax
      @meatax 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Kilo Byte are you german ?

  • @Minoritynomad
    @Minoritynomad 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3902

    the production of this video is brilliant.

    • @explorerextraordinaire5472
      @explorerextraordinaire5472 4 ปีที่แล้ว +26

      Agreed.

    • @monkeh22222
      @monkeh22222 4 ปีที่แล้ว +79

      The production is indeed very good, but I would point out that at 0:11, 0:21, 1:29, 6:45 and 6:54 the lens cover is still on the lens which is why the poor camera operator can't see anything in the viewfinder - except at 0:21 where it's a replay via the return feed.... just sayin'

    • @zwickflixproductions4379
      @zwickflixproductions4379 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Voiceofreason sounds like somebody else works with these on a regular basis ;)

    • @zebrazone
      @zebrazone  4 ปีที่แล้ว +289

      @@monkeh22222 Good point ! We left it on every time we didn't record because we were so scared of dust / unfortunate accidents.

    • @tophan5146
      @tophan5146 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Minority Nomad, I was about to comment the same as well.
      Incredible production of this video

  • @thejeffreyrichard
    @thejeffreyrichard 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Quality stuff!
    Thank you for putting so much effort into this. It's eye-opening!

  • @ajlbeer
    @ajlbeer 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    That was great, I really love that you made this. I have seen some cool videos about camera operators at sporting events who operate these kinds of broadcast specific set ups, but I never saw a good breakdown of the cameras. Thanks very much!

  • @DailyStreetRacing
    @DailyStreetRacing 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1643

    No idea why TH-cam Recommended this but it’s interesting to say the least!

    • @actualfactual8737
      @actualfactual8737 4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Probably that T H I C C ass!!!

    • @calebbliss6588
      @calebbliss6588 4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      @@actualfactual8737 what the fuck

    • @danielcroft7653
      @danielcroft7653 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Agreed!

    • @aryamanake4455
      @aryamanake4455 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      They are getting better day by day.

    • @fletchj
      @fletchj 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Thought the same thing. Why? *click* well damn that was interesting. Well played TH-cam.

  • @parthdhawale
    @parthdhawale 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1863

    I thought this guy had 1 million subs after seeing the production quality

    • @tanmaisaxena7642
      @tanmaisaxena7642 4 ปีที่แล้ว +39

      i think our guy deserves multiple million!

    • @jhodges7041
      @jhodges7041 4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      @@tanmaisaxena7642 1 more here

    • @goyardgod7388
      @goyardgod7388 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Subs have noting to do with quality of work the work remains wat it is even if he had 0 subs you TH-cam folks base life off of subs and likes 😂🤣

    • @Gotchaaaaaa
      @Gotchaaaaaa 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@goyardgod7388 *what

    • @0ooTheMAXXoo0
      @0ooTheMAXXoo0 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Why would that make sense? The most popular channels are streamers with zero quality... The biggest blockbuster films tend to be shot the worst... Quality does not go along with popularity very often. Usually safe and bland is needed for anything to be popular.

  • @adityasanthanam1945
    @adityasanthanam1945 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This is an amazing video. Such high quality, great explanations, and use of actual, expensive gear.

  • @joshhayes3433
    @joshhayes3433 ปีที่แล้ว

    This is something I've wondered about for a long time and now I know... mission accomplished, and well done! Loved the video!

  • @joshuaoluwaseyi3832
    @joshuaoluwaseyi3832 3 ปีที่แล้ว +743

    I didn’t get any ad even with this level of dedication in this production. Why?

    • @UditENG-xi4pu
      @UditENG-xi4pu 3 ปีที่แล้ว +101

      I feel like I need it pay for such high quality of video

    • @jonnybouyyt880
      @jonnybouyyt880 3 ปีที่แล้ว +34

      With his skill he’d probably never need the money

    • @owendavies8227
      @owendavies8227 3 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      Even if the video is monitized, sometimes no one wants to pay for an ad. About half of ad slots on youtube are filled.

    • @yankleber
      @yankleber 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      Because today is you lucky day. Get out of the bed any go buy a lottery ticket.

    • @hexagonist23
      @hexagonist23 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Why are you complaining about not getting an ad? I use an adblocker all the time.

  • @rossmarino2776
    @rossmarino2776 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3533

    This is exactly the type of cameras UFO hunters around the world need.

    • @Joker-ig8im
      @Joker-ig8im 3 ปีที่แล้ว +71

      Now thats funny!!!

    • @starmorpheus
      @starmorpheus 3 ปีที่แล้ว +263

      A 2021 smartphone can give you solid footage. Funny how UFO/UAV video footage dropped to nothing after high quality cameras became common place.

    • @macberg5806
      @macberg5806 3 ปีที่แล้ว +146

      @@starmorpheus oh yeah? Have you tried recording the moon with your phone camera? You’re talking out of your ass buddy, phone cameras can’t capture any level of detailed required when what is being recorded allegedly are tiny lights in the sky lmao.

    • @paddington1670
      @paddington1670 3 ปีที่แล้ว +20

      im sure the camera on the jets that followed those UFOs were millions of dollars and people still try to discredit the fighter pilots.

    • @starmorpheus
      @starmorpheus 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      @@macberg5806 Then why was there an influx of home-made videos of supposed "proof" of UFOs since the early 2000s to mid 2010s? People believed those videos then, and still believe them now. Even when there is unrefutable proof that all those videos (Aside from the ones disclosed by the Pentagon) are all false.

  • @jameskurgat9614
    @jameskurgat9614 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great insights and much more compelling dedication towards the video. Admirable!

  • @luckyeddy350
    @luckyeddy350 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3022

    Finally a camera operator who doesn't want to sound smart by throwing a bizzare range of lingo about all the technical stuff. Rather gets to the point. And does an extremely good job at that.

    • @WoodiePlays
      @WoodiePlays 3 ปีที่แล้ว +49

      "throwing a bizarre range of lingo" isn't trying to sound smart. They are smart and doesn't need to bring themselves down to your level to satisfy your lack of vocabulary.

    • @luckyeddy350
      @luckyeddy350 3 ปีที่แล้ว +155

      @@WoodiePlays another smart ass idiot.

    • @haziqq
      @haziqq 2 ปีที่แล้ว +285

      @@WoodiePlays Real smart person should have the ability to make complex things sound simple, so more people could understand it. They're not bringing themselves down by doing that, but lifting other people together to achieve equal understanding. Being arrogant and condescending on the other hand, only vocalise your insecurity towards your own intellect.

    • @SynchroM3h
      @SynchroM3h 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Great way of demonstrating why TV Cameras are big. This video was great. Liked without a reminder... 👍👏

    • @WoodiePlays
      @WoodiePlays 2 ปีที่แล้ว +89

      @@haziqq i was wrong, I agree with you.

  • @ryanreedgibson
    @ryanreedgibson 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    This video has shown up in my feed for 3 years. I never clicked it because it's a topic I'm too familiar with. Great graphics and the sound design was superb.

  • @oshinb7
    @oshinb7 ปีที่แล้ว

    The Production quality in this video is mind blowing, good job Zebra Zone! Keep making more videos like this one.

  • @juanbilbao3848
    @juanbilbao3848 4 ปีที่แล้ว +972

    *RED CINEMA CAMERAS ARE SO EXPENSIVE DUDE*
    TV: Hold my lens

    • @adriankoch964
      @adriankoch964 4 ปีที่แล้ว +35

      Red spends most of its effort in taking consumer level, off-the-shelf components and making them proprietary and then many times more expensive. (Like their scammy storage bits and "custom" connectors)

    • @joshuaheffernan4374
      @joshuaheffernan4374 4 ปีที่แล้ว +26

      @@adriankoch964 the apple of cameras

    • @HowtoComputer
      @HowtoComputer 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Joshua Heffernan even Apple aren’t as scant as red

    • @joshuaheffernan4374
      @joshuaheffernan4374 4 ปีที่แล้ว +23

      @@HowtoComputer if apple made studio cameras they wouldn't have removable storage

    • @BrogramFilmss
      @BrogramFilmss 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@joshuaheffernan4374 true

  • @devillonesome8648
    @devillonesome8648 4 ปีที่แล้ว +686

    Guy : DSLR is cheap.
    Me : HUH?
    Hears quarter million
    Me : yeah DSLR is cheap indeed.

    • @paajake
      @paajake 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      😂😂😂😂😂

    • @brendenuzamaki8627
      @brendenuzamaki8627 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Zabuza!

    • @grapy83
      @grapy83 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      LOL. I was thinking the same thing

    • @jasondashney
      @jasondashney 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yet the DSLR is an IQ that's WAY better than a broadcast camera (rolling shutter etc aside). I laughed my ass off when I found out how TINY the sensors they use are. 4:21

  • @SubTheHan
    @SubTheHan 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    really enjoyed the audio for this video! great job!

  • @markwarren4674
    @markwarren4674 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Excellent job explaining and demonstrating how studio cameras function and why they exist still in the marketplace.

  • @stonifranykbing5057
    @stonifranykbing5057 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1282

    Welcome back to:
    *Random things you can't afford*
    In this episode:
    *$250.000 Rocket Launcher Camera*

    • @bryanarnold8543
      @bryanarnold8543 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      LOL pretty funny random joke 😉

    • @terminator6277
      @terminator6277 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Lol

    • @alexkatz9047
      @alexkatz9047 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      well, it costs like a cheap(ish) house. So you kinda can. You can get a mortgage or a big loan

    • @andreasschroder7880
      @andreasschroder7880 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I actually enjoy videos which are not just commercials aimed at old white guys with to much money...

    • @Dragonite_Tom
      @Dragonite_Tom 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Unless if you are a wealthy person

  • @odovacer4074
    @odovacer4074 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2407

    This video is for those who says "Will smartphones ever completely replace cameras?"

    • @wilismatrix9847
      @wilismatrix9847 4 ปีที่แล้ว +96

      sur if it will be 50kg 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

    • @arman4chok
      @arman4chok 4 ปีที่แล้ว +69

      the answer is - partially

    • @papayonstudio
      @papayonstudio 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      So true haha

    • @Kage-jk4pj
      @Kage-jk4pj 4 ปีที่แล้ว +71

      The answer is no. Smart phones will never have lenses that massive you wouldnt even be able to carry the phone if they did

    • @guntherz5516
      @guntherz5516 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@wilismatrix9847 Then it will not smart, hahaha...

  • @DTEL77
    @DTEL77 12 วันที่ผ่านมา

    I loved the shots that illustrated what was being said, so interesting.

  • @marvinochieng6295
    @marvinochieng6295 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very insightful. Good job dude !

  • @theloniousMac
    @theloniousMac 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2376

    And yet there's never one around when the UFOs come.

    • @wooferjr169
      @wooferjr169 4 ปีที่แล้ว +141

      Becuse it's usually in a remote place and no one is carrying a 150lb behemoth $200,000 camera.
      Besides, I don't believe in ufo crap.

    • @undoubtedlyso4542
      @undoubtedlyso4542 4 ปีที่แล้ว +69

      wooferjr is an alien confirmed

    • @BlunderMunchkin
      @BlunderMunchkin 4 ปีที่แล้ว +60

      Because good video equipment and/or a person who knows how to use a camera turns UFOs into IFOs.

    • @PeterGriffinANIMALCRACKERS
      @PeterGriffinANIMALCRACKERS 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@wooferjr169 says the cartoon mouse.
      Wait a minute..

    • @yamahonkawazuki
      @yamahonkawazuki 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      there is its just the image quality is still crap.

  • @brokenwizards9122
    @brokenwizards9122 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1959

    That’s the most french shirt Ever.

    • @DlcEnergy
      @DlcEnergy 4 ปีที่แล้ว +79

      sacré bleu

    • @wazeseedz7544
      @wazeseedz7544 4 ปีที่แล้ว +31

      Oui

    • @MerlinDeLyon
      @MerlinDeLyon 4 ปีที่แล้ว +44

      You have now subscribed to Fun French Facts!
      Fun French Fact #308 : This shirt is called a marinière
      Une putain de marinière, rien que ça

    • @krys8494
      @krys8494 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Merlinou lol tes fou my nigga

    • @tugrulcagr7640
      @tugrulcagr7640 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      I thought it was a Russian thing.

  • @mastpg
    @mastpg 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Damn, dude...very solidly sourced and well produced content. Well done.

  • @Benis650
    @Benis650 ปีที่แล้ว

    This is really a great video, love all your works in it, good job!

  • @hagaras82030
    @hagaras82030 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1594

    Someone for the love of God, please have this set up when a ufo flys by.

    • @esoterik-fb5kz
      @esoterik-fb5kz 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Ugh no?

    • @traph1852
      @traph1852 4 ปีที่แล้ว +316

      nah for those type of events they always pull out the big guns like a nokia 3220

    • @sumangalabhai8808
      @sumangalabhai8808 4 ปีที่แล้ว +22

      @@traph1852 true lol😁

    • @Hyzic
      @Hyzic 4 ปีที่แล้ว +23

      Or at the very least when Sasquatch pops up, instead of getting him on a potato camera lmao

    • @cheesebusiness
      @cheesebusiness 4 ปีที่แล้ว +123

      The problem is that with this camera the UFO will stop being an UFO

  • @runar4993
    @runar4993 4 ปีที่แล้ว +838

    imagine seeing someone try to clean the lens with their t-shirt

    • @bryanarnold8543
      @bryanarnold8543 4 ปีที่แล้ว +53

      As someone dives at them FULL SPEED screaming NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    • @FreedomTalkMedia
      @FreedomTalkMedia 4 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      They have a cover over it. It would be fine.

    • @MariusMerchiers
      @MariusMerchiers 4 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      I do that all the time with my camera. But it costs only 300 euros 😅

    • @t1gl1t
      @t1gl1t 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Can I sign your lens - it'll be awesome LOL

    • @vaj1414
      @vaj1414 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      epic prank

  • @jhamby8773
    @jhamby8773 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    This is broadcast level quality production. This could be a TV episode! Incredible job.

  • @theneverman
    @theneverman หลายเดือนก่อน

    Very interesting and insightful. Also excellent production on your part.

  • @tikkinash5220
    @tikkinash5220 4 ปีที่แล้ว +357

    As a professional Cameraoperator working with these lenses I have to say that this video is absolutly briliant. The next time when I will be asked why this cameras are so expensive I will give them the link to this video. Thank you for your great job on this. Your channel is added now.

    • @castro6051
      @castro6051 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Tikki Nash how did you get the job if you don’t mind me asking?!

    • @trsc32
      @trsc32 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Yeah I’m curious, how do you end up with a job like that?

    • @tikkinash5220
      @tikkinash5220 4 ปีที่แล้ว +26

      20 years ago I started as camera and technical assistent in a big Austrian television and Filmproduction. After 7 years learning from many great cameraoperators and DOPs, I got the chance to do camera by the first daily soap in Austria. I did a good job, lucky me. if I did a bad job , maybe today I would not be a cameraoperator. Till that I do camera on sportevents, konzerts, tv shows, news, and so on. But I also do documentaries and ENG stuff.

    • @thr6453
      @thr6453 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Can you please tell me how can a person can get into the jobs like this? And how do you earn and how do you and how much you earn from this? Please make a video for that if possible

    • @tomj.
      @tomj. 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@thr6453 Honestly, it's all down to experience and who you know. Start building up a portfolio of work that you can show to potential employers. Get involved with any opportunities you can to do this kind of thing, paid or unpaid.
      In the UK, the salary for a camera operator is about average or a hair above. It's okay, but nothing amazing.

  • @MrBareikis
    @MrBareikis 4 ปีที่แล้ว +918

    Why would you even press dislike button when this much effort and information is put in one single video for absolutely free?
    Thanks man, great job and informative video!

    • @0ooTheMAXXoo0
      @0ooTheMAXXoo0 4 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      Because that is how you guide the TH-cam recommendations? Like and dislike are not supposed to reflect quality but if the video fits what you personally want to have recommended to you or not. Video popularity in general goes up with interactions but the like and dislike will shape what TH-cam decides to show you.

    • @MEGABOINK65
      @MEGABOINK65 4 ปีที่แล้ว +25

      Those dislikes are flip-phone owners.

    • @meroo4574
      @meroo4574 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Disgruntled introspective hipsters that are too cool for broadcast TV (probably still angry that Final Cut Pro self destructed) these were probably the same that left AVID for FCP. hahahahaha

    • @thejaiz8564
      @thejaiz8564 4 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      @@0ooTheMAXXoo0 um you do know there is button that says "don't recommend this"? You should not dislike the video, this was amazing.

    • @issastudios7954
      @issastudios7954 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      some men just wanna watch the world burn ~Alfred from Batman

  • @mandono2863
    @mandono2863 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I am a student at a TV-school that uses equipment like this, and i am happy that i found this channel, very educational!

  • @Capnmax
    @Capnmax 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    He's wearing that shirt so we know he's French.

  • @jpm_drums
    @jpm_drums 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1274

    All that just to be seen in a 480p tv standard.

    • @kamalpreetsingh5569
      @kamalpreetsingh5569 4 ปีที่แล้ว +47

      Jose F Pirela damn that hurts 😂😂😂👌

    • @roverjerr3265
      @roverjerr3265 4 ปีที่แล้ว +19

      Yeah i had the same thoughts

    • @MohitJouhari
      @MohitJouhari 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Lol. They have to maintain quality

    • @siriusgd4753
      @siriusgd4753 4 ปีที่แล้ว +43

      Who has a 480p TV these days? I cringe when I see a 720p.

    • @godfirst7216
      @godfirst7216 4 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      SiriusGD How would u cringe?

  • @vishnunair6282
    @vishnunair6282 3 ปีที่แล้ว +345

    0:40 When he said DSLRs with zoom lenses were not expensive, a single tear rolled down my my eye😭

    • @jonaslinter
      @jonaslinter 3 ปีที่แล้ว +39

      Yeah, but compared to that Broadcast Camera Setup it is cheap

    • @stephenjones9153
      @stephenjones9153 3 ปีที่แล้ว +24

      My daughter did photography at College and took Amazing close up pictures of the craters on the moon with nothing more than a Nikon Digital camera £50 and a brick wall for the tripod. I know I'm biased but penny for penny her pictures were very impressive.

    • @draco89123
      @draco89123 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Compared to 200 grand lens, heh.

    • @TGLasers
      @TGLasers 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@stephenjones9153 Pictures and video are two wholy different animals. A camera can be cheap as dirty. cause it only needs to snap 1 frame. where as these cameras need to take 24 frames every second in 4-8K resolution with RAW data. often peaking 700Mbps. Anything you can obtain from best buy or stores the like is amature stuff and cant even be compaired to production cameras from the 80s...

    • @LawHelpBD
      @LawHelpBD 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      True .

  • @retsub3
    @retsub3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I wasn't sure had the attention span for this but it was so lucid and easy to digest! Excellent teacher, very personable, learned a ton 👏👏

  • @CAMERA-COM
    @CAMERA-COM หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you for the wonderful video. You are creative, and these cameras are expensive, but they give excellent results. Thank you for all the support and respect for you and the work team.

  • @MayankJairaj
    @MayankJairaj 4 ปีที่แล้ว +308

    I'll keep this video in my 'why smartphones can't replace cameras' list

    • @iforgotmyusername0
      @iforgotmyusername0 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      lol

    • @tanmaisaxena7642
      @tanmaisaxena7642 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      xDDDDDDD

    • @Nordlicht05
      @Nordlicht05 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      And than comes the Moment the audience gives a shit and TH-camrs filming these things with there own DSLR or Handy cameras.

    • @0ooTheMAXXoo0
      @0ooTheMAXXoo0 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@Nordlicht05 When the audience starts to care then TH-camrs will film these things with their own cameras or phones? That is what you wrote. What were you trying to say though?

    • @vigd6298
      @vigd6298 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      smartphone sensor is too small, too much noise for indoor shot

  • @yowaifps
    @yowaifps 4 ปีที่แล้ว +554

    Now we know how they film people eating hotdogs at a baseball game

    • @bryanh2618
      @bryanh2618 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      🤣

    • @CekalaStudios
      @CekalaStudios 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      One time I was at a wriggly rooftop that is across from wriggly field in Chicago, and on one of the TVs I saw they got bored and cut to a camera zoomed in on someone painting their house

  • @sameichorn3757
    @sameichorn3757 ปีที่แล้ว

    i love quality answers to questions ive never had. Great job!

  • @darkspeed62
    @darkspeed62 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    As a photographer, I clicked on this not to actuallt watch it but to read the comments. I don't think anyone in the main is really asking this, but it does amuse me when people are so blown away by the quality of phone cameras.
    Phone cameras will never be able to produce what a camera lens that foes on your SLR or mirrorless camera will, so it isn't a surpise that the cinematograpgy and TV cameras haven't got smaller or much cheaper.
    Take a look at the technology that goes into ARRI Signature Prime Lenses and you will see why they're expensive.

  • @filteredcreativity9409
    @filteredcreativity9409 4 ปีที่แล้ว +424

    And boom. Everything I learned in college is now free online.

    • @Cekmore
      @Cekmore 4 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      Why I didn't go! Hahah enjoy that loan bruh🍻🐈🔥

    • @Cyrx686
      @Cyrx686 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Sorry bud

    • @populouswonder5490
      @populouswonder5490 4 ปีที่แล้ว +27

      Haha but at least you understand the why and why nots while someone like me just understands...big box makes you zoom in and out and don’t touch lens

    • @matthewbaynham6286
      @matthewbaynham6286 4 ปีที่แล้ว +28

      It might be online but process of learning it is still point of going to college.
      I have a degree in mathematics and in a pub when someone wants to sound intellectual by quoting some element of maths of physics they usually get it wrong and I mean simple things like understanding words like "linear" or using the word "exponential" when something increases rapidly.
      All the knowledge is online and stays there and doesn't enter people's heads unless they go through the difficult process of learning it.

    • @toasternfriends3329
      @toasternfriends3329 4 ปีที่แล้ว +19

      @@matthewbaynham6286 "...when someone wants to sound intellectual by *quoting some element of maths of physics..."*
      Huh?
      "they usually get it wrong and I mean simple things... like 'exponential' when something increases rapidly."
      There's a mathematical definition of exponential and there's a layman's definition of exponential, just like the term 'theory' as it relates to science and as it relates colloquially. You are literally wrong about other people being wrong in the pub.

  • @stevezelaznik5872
    @stevezelaznik5872 4 ปีที่แล้ว +299

    No idea why TH-cam recommended this video but I'm glad they did.

    • @PastTime777
      @PastTime777 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      I think the title icon is perfect, with the 250,000 in big letters. Plus he got lucky it's in the home section of recommended videos.

  • @charlesarizona
    @charlesarizona 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Well paced, precise, succinct, and compelling!

  • @imagunner7164
    @imagunner7164 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    This video did a great job on explaining broadcast cameras and their higher tier models usages with explanations on implementation. I used to work in that field as one of the operators and I miss playing with the toys worth more than my existence.

  • @keyikush
    @keyikush ปีที่แล้ว

    Amazing video dude. Appreciate your work

  • @NotShowingOff
    @NotShowingOff 4 ปีที่แล้ว +548

    Are you telling me National Geographic journalists aren’t in any real danger?

  • @imdisturbeddd1625
    @imdisturbeddd1625 3 ปีที่แล้ว +516

    Finally, a budget camera that’s actually decent

    • @justinmiller129
      @justinmiller129 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      It reminds me of the *_cougar in this video_* th-cam.com/video/U2rNnzVotS0/w-d-xo.html&.fnbo

    • @m_som
      @m_som 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      lol

    • @joeyjamison5772
      @joeyjamison5772 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      ...said Bill Gates.

  • @christopherprowse3527
    @christopherprowse3527 ปีที่แล้ว

    This is what I love about TH-cam! I’ve been educated on a subject I have little interest in and something I will probably never need, but I enjoyed it, and I’m a smarter person as a result of it! Awesome!

  • @ErnestoValdezJr
    @ErnestoValdezJr 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Awesome video... top quality and very informative. I kinda knew some of the info but there were questions you answered that I had. Thank you!

  • @mitchellclark2786
    @mitchellclark2786 4 ปีที่แล้ว +551

    I actually shot a couple of college games for ESPN, and here's a fun fact: We didn't control the apertures on our cameras. There was a person in the control room (if we needed them to do something, their call sign over the radio was ISO) who managed the exposure and color balance of the camera. They'd deal with (as their name implied) the gain of the camera, the aperture, color balance, ND, you name it. That way the operators only had to worry about composition (and very occasionally focus).
    Also: lifting one of those $250K box lenses onto a scissor lift was VERY nerve wracking.

    • @st.michaelthearchangel7774
      @st.michaelthearchangel7774 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Definitely!

    • @BonelessVisual
      @BonelessVisual 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      it’s on CCU

    • @HardDriver3950
      @HardDriver3950 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      Fascinating stuff. I had no idea it worked that way. Thanks for sharing.

    • @TrevorHammonds
      @TrevorHammonds 3 ปีที่แล้ว +31

      This is very common in a broadcast setup. This, as you indicated, allows the operator to focus on getting the shot. But more importantly, it allows one person in a controlled environment to ensure all the cameras have a consistent look. They have a calibrated monitor for each camera, a vectorscope to check color, and a waveform monitor to check the brightness.

    • @rykerhasyounow
      @rykerhasyounow 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Quite right. But we had ours managed via the software automatically while shooting fight nights. I must admit as well, that we were achieving reputable results on gear worth a fraction of the cost. As in less than 1/10th of a $150k cam.

  • @retardedbongo9681
    @retardedbongo9681 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1881

    So basically a telescope with screen recording.

    • @vincea1830
      @vincea1830 3 ปีที่แล้ว +67

      Well yeah if you ignore the other 5 features that telescopes/recording devices dont typically have.

    • @kamalmanzukie
      @kamalmanzukie 3 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      @@vincea1830 please do not ignore features

    • @sunnohh
      @sunnohh 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Not really, it does a bunch of stuff that is totally impossible on a telescope

    • @LeeHawkinsPhoto
      @LeeHawkinsPhoto 3 ปีที่แล้ว +22

      No...because telescopes don’t do near focus...8mm is a crazy wide angle. These lenses don’t have the barrel or pincushion distortion that zoom lenses often suffer from either...or the focus breathing. And the lens has built in neutral density filters...lol so not at all like a telescope! All of this makes for an extremely expensive lens.

    • @benjaminbenavidesiglesias52
      @benjaminbenavidesiglesias52 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Telescope has not zoom...

  • @ONUCHEJAT
    @ONUCHEJAT ปีที่แล้ว

    Weldone brother, so very thoughtful of you to come out with this topic, and the efforts you put in making this video was epic... I was not surprised when I saw 11million views, you deserve it, bravo

  • @MobifixxifiboM
    @MobifixxifiboM ปีที่แล้ว

    What a well made video, the shots, everything. Just bliss in the eyes

  • @PiXimperfect
    @PiXimperfect 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6173

    I can only imagine the effort, cost, and overall dedication that went into creating this extraordinary video! My salutes to you, sir!

    • @singhamgadhvi1875
      @singhamgadhvi1875 2 ปีที่แล้ว +71

      God of Photoshop is here

    • @gujunkaixiang
      @gujunkaixiang 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻

    • @bhavindhandhukiya410
      @bhavindhandhukiya410 2 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      Oh Unmesh sir is here 🙌🏻🙌🏻

    • @aparneshshukla6194
      @aparneshshukla6194 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      O sir i learn from u.... It is really very overwhelming that how a great personality ever know the another great one around...
      So much thanks for ur best Photoshop tutorials...helps alot...

    • @hencexperfect
      @hencexperfect 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Mann i meet you here too...my inspiration

  • @hsk2978
    @hsk2978 4 ปีที่แล้ว +834

    This setup is much more expensive than my house, my car, my computer and my organs on black market combined...

    • @ClausRust
      @ClausRust 4 ปีที่แล้ว +25

      False, just a heart and a liver cost more than this camera. Not including a kidney in the states. Just that alone is more than this camera

    • @hsk2978
      @hsk2978 4 ปีที่แล้ว +30

      @@ClausRust I'm not from the USA and my organs are not in so good condition anyone would want to use them. And if there is anything like cannibal black market, I would have discount price label on me I guess.

    • @Wladik0
      @Wladik0 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      You are so FUNNY XDDDDD You must be a comedian or somthing like that

    • @Wladik0
      @Wladik0 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@ClausRust obviously i am not talking to you

    • @excitedbox5705
      @excitedbox5705 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@ClausRust Jokes on you. His Ex broke his heart and the insuing alcoholism destroyed his liver and kidneys.

  • @yumenokoyume
    @yumenokoyume หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I like how it zoomed in to the drone so fast like it was faked in After Effects. Seeing it for real is just awseome

  • @AirTrashed
    @AirTrashed ปีที่แล้ว

    Outstanding and comprehensive. Would love to see a more details surrounding the equipment in future videos.

  • @ianswildoutthere
    @ianswildoutthere 3 ปีที่แล้ว +401

    I feel like I need to pay for this quality of production

    • @brucetrappleton6984
      @brucetrappleton6984 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Well, that’s only if your broadcast is live. If you have the chance to take the footage to post, then you don’t need such a specialized gear. You know, if you are no live you can cut camera, move it closer, avoid in camera zooms, etc. Hence you won’t need that fluid head, that tripod and that lens. Not even that monitor.

    • @SirDella
      @SirDella 3 ปีที่แล้ว +25

      @@brucetrappleton6984 uhm, he was talking about these videos

    • @brucetrappleton6984
      @brucetrappleton6984 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@SirDella uhm, this video was made with that gear.

    • @glamorous4eva
      @glamorous4eva 3 ปีที่แล้ว +23

      @@brucetrappleton6984 bro what you didn't get the comment at all 😂

    • @mrboojay
      @mrboojay 3 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      @@brucetrappleton6984 I believe he is referring to he feels he needs to pay to have watched this video because it was so high quality.

  • @zedramer
    @zedramer 4 ปีที่แล้ว +628

    When I interned for a sports broadcaster in college, my director told me that my lens "costs more than you."

    • @billydarley6925
      @billydarley6925 4 ปีที่แล้ว +97

      makes a lot of sense, huh? "lets pay someone pocket lint to operate something outrageously expensive."

    • @godfreypoon5148
      @godfreypoon5148 4 ปีที่แล้ว +55

      It's true. We budget about US$120,000 for a human life.
      Oh, you meant your wage.

    • @Adlore
      @Adlore 4 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      @@billydarley6925 so if they were given a shitty camera to do the same job they should be paid less? How expensive the equipment is does not correlate to how skillful the job is, or the demand of that job

    • @Wimbold
      @Wimbold 4 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      @@Adlore Well, at least they might care a bit more.

    • @fritsvandeklok3819
      @fritsvandeklok3819 4 ปีที่แล้ว +20

      When I worked as a broadcast cameraman, it was always good fun to hear 'don't forget that lens costs more than your house!' while climbing up a stage or ladder with that lens... Good old times!

  • @imoutodaisuki
    @imoutodaisuki 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    6:00 the cow shot's gorgeous! Especially when paused, the bugs looked like dust particles, it's so good.

  • @user-tz2wk6wc8h
    @user-tz2wk6wc8h ปีที่แล้ว

    Dude, that's amazing! Thank you for efforts!

  • @roscoebaram681
    @roscoebaram681 3 ปีที่แล้ว +228

    Can this guy have a Netflix show? His videos are more well produced and more interesting than 99% of Netflix shows.

    • @AutoVive
      @AutoVive 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      "Give this man a Netflix Show"

  • @lekcinnave3257
    @lekcinnave3257 4 ปีที่แล้ว +58

    They missed a HUGE opportunity to unzoom at the end and show they have been recording this from far across the room. Im not mad, im disappointed.

    • @DemMedHornene
      @DemMedHornene 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      They would've had to have two cameras since one is in the background, but it would have been worth it, I agree.

    • @BradyR95
      @BradyR95 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Only would have really worked if they could zoom all the way out from the lenses max zoom, and theres no way that room is big enough for that

    • @silvermediastudio
      @silvermediastudio 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      ^^ big brain on this one

  • @knightandlord
    @knightandlord ปีที่แล้ว

    Amazing effort put into this. Thank you

  • @fun2ush2009
    @fun2ush2009 ปีที่แล้ว

    I have got answer which I searching for many years. Great effort man !! Keep going

  • @hollywoodheiner6028
    @hollywoodheiner6028 3 ปีที่แล้ว +877

    I used to work for a full service TV broadcast studio. Every time we got a request for a smaller production I had to discuss our camera rental prices. People just didn't understand that the technology is much more complex and high-end than a small DSLR for a TH-cam production. I wish I could have just sent this video along at the time.

    • @75ajw
      @75ajw 2 ปีที่แล้ว +42

      It seems that the bandwagon of 'cheap digital gear' creates a mentality that is oblivious to engineering aspects of lens functionality and camera control that is much harder to do on the cheap!

    • @MmntechCa
      @MmntechCa 2 ปีที่แล้ว +21

      The costs have come down quite a bit though that you can now get cheaper gear that will often outperform the big, bulky ENG cameras from just a few short years ago. Like you're paying tens of thousands for an XDCAM, which still only has a 2/3'' or even a 1/2'' sensor, where as Sony's own FS7 has a full frame sensor that produces some really nice cinema quality video, and costs nearly half as much. But it largely depends on what you're doing with it. I'd still use a proper EFP setup for sports. I don't think those cheaper cameras work with CCUs. Plus the big boys support those monster lenses. But for news and documentaries, those bulky ENG cameras should be relegated to the scrap heap. Camera operators have given enough money to the chiropractic industry. lol

    • @joylox
      @joylox 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @MLWATKK Yes, I have a Canon, and my whole setup, probably would cost around $8K, for camera, both lenses I have, tripod, mic with wind-reduction cover, LED light, extra battery, carry case, etc. Thankfully I got some of that on trade in, and I won a giveaway at a store for some gear, but that would still assume being able to change lenses. And for affordable video, the Sony camcorders are about $1000, but they don't have good depth of field, the lighting often needs to be edited, and they're super sensitive to motion meaning you need a really fancy tripod. I used one on hard wood floor, and a kid ran by it and shook it. My dad was able to wire up a way to be able to control zoom on his Sony camcorder from a greater distance, but most aren't compatible with that, so you also need whatever staging to put the operator into the right position to do everything. It's a lot of post-production work, to get anything under $20K to look anywhere as good as live TV.

    • @hollywoodheiner6028
      @hollywoodheiner6028 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@MmntechCaThese Sonys were around for years now and produce a extremely more pleasing picture imho compared to cropped sensor cameras like the usual big ones in the studio. And yea they are cheaper but you know what the problem is? It’s just not compatible with the control room equipment and the whole studio environment. And most studios only invest big numbers every 20 years or so. Like my ex employer has upgraded the equipment the last time when broadcast stations switched from SD to HD. Some studios are still upscaling from SD 16:9 to HD to save money on equipment. TV is just it’s own universe 😅

    • @ILoveWomen
      @ILoveWomen 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Funnily enough, I saw a show on Discovery shot entirely on an Alpha mirrorless and 2 go pros. It was a travel show though

  • @nickpearce1129
    @nickpearce1129 2 ปีที่แล้ว +515

    When I worked in Sports Production, we had a saying, “Sony Parts cost more then body parts.” A broken arm is cheaper to fix then damaged gear.

    • @Rutherford_Inchworm_III
      @Rutherford_Inchworm_III 2 ปีที่แล้ว +103

      Kind of a sad statement, isn't it? We're such an advanced species we can create an electrical picture box that's worth more than a human life and designed only to enable couch-dwellers to watch men kick an inflated pig's bladder around in crystal-clear 4k, but we can't solve world hunger.

    • @Herkan97
      @Herkan97 2 ปีที่แล้ว +24

      ​@@Rutherford_Inchworm_III World hunger can probably be solved, but it wouldn't be within any system most people want besides perhaps those going hungry if even them.
      It can be seen in some non-white immigration to USA, where once someone has moved to the USA they don't want other non-whites to come in because they've already made it. They may even describe anyone else trying to come in as dirty and whatever, because why do they care as they've already made it in.
      I think this was something that could occur near the Q3-Q4 of 2015. Or just at any time if you bother looking in the right places.
      Basically anyone that works enough or are lucky enough does not want anyone else to gain as much as them while not working as much or being as lucky as them. Or gain anything at all, as is the case with immigration. They probably know what type of people may come in.
      If enough people wanted that it would have already happened. One could ask a large group of people, but you can't verify that it is the truth, so you'll have to look at what actually is rather than what people are saying it is. Even if some are honest, it can't be verified and can't count.
      Some say stuff like "If I work as a surgeon and someone works at McDonald's and make the same money, why would I waste my time working as a surgeon if I could earn just as much at McDonald's?"
      Which is funny because they're implying you spend all that time in the hopes of saving lives just to..get money? I would think you become a surgeon to save some lives, but I guess it was all about money in the end.
      I tried to write some stuff about the end of finite resources but eh, it all feels so pointless. I find writing comments fun but not when it turns sour like that so it's all gone now.
      I edit my comments a lot and TH-cam doesn't update the section so if someone has replied to the text I just deleted, oops. Oops for all the times someone has done that. Just the comments you've commented on in the current page..It sounds easy for TH-cam to implement that.

    • @mawlinzebra
      @mawlinzebra 2 ปีที่แล้ว +21

      @@Herkan97 it's literally just human nature. For there to be winners, there need to be loosers.

    • @iprobablyhaveapoint
      @iprobablyhaveapoint 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Is that why they didn't help much that stunt double on resident evil?
      (She crashed on a camera on highspeed and lost an arm)

    • @realtalk6195
      @realtalk6195 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @D What Herkan said was completely valid and legit, and isn't a result of merely "western philosophy" either. The phenomena of peoples competing and fighting over limited resources occurs worldwide and has throughout time, and even occurs among groups claiming to be altruistic or egalitarian. Even when there's enough to go around, one group may want to hoard more because they're motivated by self-interest. Furthermore, one group trying to help another group can easily step on the toes of a third group, which then causes conflict between the first and third due to differing interests.
      Human psychology and politics makes tribalism inevitable, and one could look at it in dialectical terms of _Thesis-Anti-thesis-Synthesis._ There was a time when Irish, Italians and Poles were looked down upon in the US, but now they're part of the dominant society who may look down upon another group. There were times when French and later German speakers faced discrimination and were forced to abandon their language, but now those languages and identities are seen as positive or harmless with others now looked at with suspicion. This is what Herkan was talking about.

  • @johnathonme
    @johnathonme 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    One of the best explanation TH-cam videos I've seen, very interesting!!! Thanks

  • @scottfortwendel3943
    @scottfortwendel3943 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    First video of yours I've watched and just wanted to say GREAT JOB!! I will be watching more!!

  • @Xenthera
    @Xenthera 4 ปีที่แล้ว +994

    Hey that's the camera they used in cars to blow up the allinol

    • @carlopala
      @carlopala 4 ปีที่แล้ว +32

      Bobby Elliott big fan i see

    • @psyberpirate
      @psyberpirate 4 ปีที่แล้ว +51

      Person of culture i see

    • @Fuji_Echo
      @Fuji_Echo 4 ปีที่แล้ว +33

      huzzah, a man of culture!

    • @KhangNguyenMacCo
      @KhangNguyenMacCo 4 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      Aaaa man of the culture!!

    • @KoAkhusaNjeX
      @KoAkhusaNjeX 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      A man of culture

  • @LanceCampeau
    @LanceCampeau 4 ปีที่แล้ว +707

    Real estate = location, location, location
    Photography = lens, lens, lens

    • @kadafi4lyf
      @kadafi4lyf 4 ปีที่แล้ว +60

      Hotel= trivago

    • @phrodendekia
      @phrodendekia 4 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      It's free real estate.
      It's expensive real lens.

    • @CM-xr9oq
      @CM-xr9oq 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@phrodendekia free real estate? where?

    • @_BangDroid_
      @_BangDroid_ 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Photation Photation Photation

    • @jamiepoole
      @jamiepoole 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@kadafi4lyf Amazing comment.

  • @charleslegard716
    @charleslegard716 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Love the video. Informative, interesting, clearly intelligent. You answer the question in the first 10 minutes, so the reason people stay is they like you and your video style. 2 thumbs up!

  • @photoworkssydney613
    @photoworkssydney613 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you for making this Video. Excellent Job and appreciate you taking all the effort! A big round of applause 👏👏👏

  • @JosephByrne
    @JosephByrne 3 ปีที่แล้ว +801

    The production quality of this video is off the scale.

    • @Fusion991
      @Fusion991 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Ok

    • @terrell3664
      @terrell3664 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Fusion991 stfu I win

    • @terrell3664
      @terrell3664 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Fusion991 OK

    • @Fusion991
      @Fusion991 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@terrell3664 Ok

    • @justinmiller129
      @justinmiller129 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      It reminds me of the *_cougar in this video_* th-cam.com/video/U2rNnzVotS0/w-d-xo.html&.uibn

  • @GaWajn
    @GaWajn 3 ปีที่แล้ว +369

    I didn’t have high hopes for the accuracy or pertinence of information contained in this video, but I was very pleasantly surprised. Very well done indeed and highly accurate! I spent 35 years working with these beasts with a major broadcaster in North America. The video brought back some good memories and reminded me that I didn’t miss carrying all that bulky (but necessary) weight. Not at all 😉 Again, well done!

    • @UNSCPILOT
      @UNSCPILOT 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      It's deffinitly one of those cases where you just can't shrink everything, it's the same as people wondering why DSLRs still exist, phone cameras are actually pretty terrible in some situations such as long focal lengths, manual controls, long exposure, and so on. I got a Canon Rebel T6 mostly for astrophotography and learned first hand just how much more it can do. Having done that now, the capabilities of those broadcast cameras make a lot of sense.

    • @PanduPoluan
      @PanduPoluan 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@UNSCPILOT The abilities of the broadcast cam+lens is simply stratospheric ... and priced accordingly.

    • @ReflectedMiles
      @ReflectedMiles 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I'm pretty sure my local network station just shoots its broadcasts with cell phones and does its audio production through Air-pods with a couple of potentiometers. This is to match both the quality of the content and the quality of the broadcast over the air. If anything more is needed, they just depend on the national network or an independent contractor who has a Wowgo.

  • @kingsleybeen4370
    @kingsleybeen4370 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Very good video. You gave tons of info in a way that makes absolute sense for some like myself that have thatknow nothing at all on the subject.

  • @EliSamba
    @EliSamba ปีที่แล้ว

    Beautiful video, great explanation, outstanding production quality... so no more, I am subscribed. Thank you

  • @carloscura9479
    @carloscura9479 4 ปีที่แล้ว +485

    All this time i thought it was an all in one huge camera😂

    • @DominikMBlock
      @DominikMBlock 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Nope, it takes some time to set up these cameras and trust me most parts are heavy and very expensive.

    • @balakex
      @balakex 4 ปีที่แล้ว +28

      @@DominikMBlock I'm pretty sure he knows that now captain obvious. :D the video explained it all.

    • @bitchesbetrippin992
      @bitchesbetrippin992 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Dominik M. Block Yes the parts are very heavy and trust me they are very expensive as well.

    • @DominikMBlock
      @DominikMBlock 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@balakex wrote my comment before watching the video

    • @DominikMBlock
      @DominikMBlock 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@balakex i know, i work with these :D