She could have had the decency to have texted him and ASKED if she could drink the wine BEFORE doing so. Even when I was her age (I'm 60 now). I would have been cautious around SOME ONE ELSE'S PLACE.
That second case was an absolute waste of *everyone's* time!! It specifically said that the bag is VEGAN. How could she not have seen that when the print was definitely big enough? And then for her to get all pissy because the judge didn't rule in her favor? Un-freaking-believable!
Let’s look at it this way. It’s a stretch and likely won’t work but…leather is from cows. Cows are vegan (I’m sure however, unknowingly when munching on grass cows eat a bug or two). It could be [weakly]argued that the leather from a vegan cow is vegan leather.
If the wine was worth $20, $200 we would be okay with her drinking it. Now because it's super expensive we say she should've known better. The standard shouldn't be the price it should be what is allowable to do.
imo that man is a jerk. If he can afford to eat caviar and a $2,000 drink, I’m sure he can let her off with a scolding or something. I understand she was disrespectful to his house, but she sincerely thought it was cheap wine (yes she’s a little bit simple for that, since his tastes seem to be luxury all around) but holding a young person and putting them in debt is kind of mean. Especially since he was so rude to her at the end, too. He’s a little bit unlikeable
Just because he has a lot of money, doesn't mean she can use something that has a lot of value to him. Let's say she was house sitting for Jeff Bezos & gets stains all over his couch or accidentally breaks something of value to him. Should Jeff let her get away with it because he's wealthy?
If the wine is so precious to him, why doesn't he have it locked away when he is not at home, so its secure? If he hires her to housesit for him and he says "Make yourself at home", to me, that would indicate help yourself to the stuff in the kitchen, watch television, etc. He never said "Make yourself at home, but please don't raid my wine cellar. Or if you want wine, this is what you can have. None of that was ever articulated to her. He simply said "make yourself at home." and then got mad when she did just that and drank his $2000 dollar bottle of wine. And the fact that this is the third or fourth time that he has hired this girl shows that he believes her to be trustworthy and responsible being left alone in his home. Had their been a problem before this, he wouldn't have hired her again.
This is the equivalente of someone eating your lunch in the break room's fridge. I know that sounds ok to you. But some ppl were raised with certain principles, Including the judge. You're not supposed to touch certain things unless You're invited too. And the girl is not dumb. Either she knew exactly what she was doing or she just has an entitled mindset. It's obviously both.
@@queencharles3527 Is it, though? Typically, if you have a lunch in the breakroom at work, it will have your name written on it and the logical etiquette is "that lunch is mine, don't take it." I understand that this is his house, and his wine cellar, but he DID invite her to stay in his home and he DID SAY "make yourself at home when you are in my house." so that, to me, says he was inviting her and over the course of her watching his home on several occasions, he never indicated that this wine was not to be touched. He should have articulated that to her from the beginning and she wouldn't have drank his expensive wine.
@@CeltycSparrow I don't know what to tell you. But ppl with manners don't take valuable things from others when they're not around. Its's an ethics/polite/ curtious thing. I thought it was basic knowledge but I guess not. Atleast the judge understands.
This is the second time I disagree with this Judge. Just because someone has a wine cellar doesn't mean they are a collector. Plus he never said that the wine cellar was off limits or even explain and showed her about his expense wine. i think this judgement was wrong and maybe both are at fault and she should only pay half the cost of the wine.
1st case: he is a real gentleman & was very generous with this young lady that crossed her limit.
She could have had the decency to have texted him and ASKED if she could drink the wine BEFORE doing so. Even when I was her age (I'm 60 now). I would have been cautious around SOME ONE ELSE'S PLACE.
Great Job Judge Lake💛
Don't tell people to make yourself at home because everybody means something different by that
The wine case: She incriminated herself so many times 😂😂😂.She talks so much. Girl, SHUT UP!
The entitlement was too real.
Exactly, especially when she said the older the wine the more expensive it is. She knew that wine was expensive
The lady? She's a judge! THE Judge
Judge Lauren Lake 08:44 Bless your heart! - That was, classic. UK 🇬🇧
That second case was an absolute waste of *everyone's* time!! It specifically said that the bag is VEGAN. How could she not have seen that when the print was definitely big enough? And then for her to get all pissy because the judge didn't rule in her favor? Un-freaking-believable!
She is just slow, how did she think that it was real when the site says 100% vegan 🤨
I don’t think she was aware of what vegan means. Maybe some people just don’t.
Let’s look at it this way. It’s a stretch and likely won’t work but…leather is from cows. Cows are vegan (I’m sure however, unknowingly when munching on grass cows eat a bug or two). It could be [weakly]argued that the leather from a vegan cow is vegan leather.
If the wine was worth $20, $200 we would be okay with her drinking it. Now because it's super expensive we say she should've known better. The standard shouldn't be the price it should be what is allowable to do.
I thought the defendant was older than 21. She actually looks more like 30 . In my opinion.😮😮
Me tooo! 😮
Does it matter
@@baesoo3601 Having an opinion does matter. Of course you know that. Have a great day.☺️☺️☺️
If she at home would she takes other members food or stuff!
8:15 she did look it up she knew how much it was
Lol!!! $580 for plastic!!! Vegan leather is plastic!!!
imo that man is a jerk. If he can afford to eat caviar and a $2,000 drink, I’m sure he can let her off with a scolding or something. I understand she was disrespectful to his house, but she sincerely thought it was cheap wine (yes she’s a little bit simple for that, since his tastes seem to be luxury all around) but holding a young person and putting them in debt is kind of mean. Especially since he was so rude to her at the end, too. He’s a little bit unlikeable
She needs to learn through punishment
He was very kind to her & she crossed the limits.
Just because he has a lot of money, doesn't mean she can use something that has a lot of value to him. Let's say she was house sitting for Jeff Bezos & gets stains all over his couch or accidentally breaks something of value to him. Should Jeff let her get away with it because he's wealthy?
The most hilarious case I've ever seen😂
I dint really drink just tequila,,is she serious?
& why she cant replace the bag??!!!
If the wine is so precious to him, why doesn't he have it locked away when he is not at home, so its secure? If he hires her to housesit for him and he says "Make yourself at home", to me, that would indicate help yourself to the stuff in the kitchen, watch television, etc. He never said "Make yourself at home, but please don't raid my wine cellar. Or if you want wine, this is what you can have. None of that was ever articulated to her. He simply said "make yourself at home." and then got mad when she did just that and drank his $2000 dollar bottle of wine. And the fact that this is the third or fourth time that he has hired this girl shows that he believes her to be trustworthy and responsible being left alone in his home. Had their been a problem before this, he wouldn't have hired her again.
The entitlement is real😂
This is the equivalente of someone eating your lunch in the break room's fridge.
I know that sounds ok to you. But some ppl were raised with certain principles, Including the judge.
You're not supposed to touch certain things unless You're invited too.
And the girl is not dumb. Either she knew exactly what she was doing or she just has an entitled mindset. It's obviously both.
@@queencharles3527 Is it, though? Typically, if you have a lunch in the breakroom at work, it will have your name written on it and the logical etiquette is "that lunch is mine, don't take it." I understand that this is his house, and his wine cellar, but he DID invite her to stay in his home and he DID SAY "make yourself at home when you are in my house." so that, to me, says he was inviting her and over the course of her watching his home on several occasions, he never indicated that this wine was not to be touched. He should have articulated that to her from the beginning and she wouldn't have drank his expensive wine.
@@CeltycSparrow I don't know what to tell you. But ppl with manners don't take valuable things from others when they're not around. Its's an ethics/polite/ curtious thing. I thought it was basic knowledge but I guess not. Atleast the judge understands.
This is the second time I disagree with this Judge. Just because someone has a wine cellar doesn't mean they are a collector. Plus he never said that the wine cellar was off limits or even explain and showed her about his expense wine. i think this judgement was wrong and maybe both are at fault and she should only pay half the cost of the wine.