What if someone is at 50% and they need a full charge before they cross an area with no place to re-charge? Like on a trip across the mountains or bfe?
@@tjmakings watch OutOfSpec Motoring road trips on Rivian he took it across the CO mountain pass when head3d to AZ. He explains charging and EV road trips route planning better than anyone
@@ravitoday Of course, the tested knew about this. Like I said - this was an impromptu test during a first drive event. Not enough time to verify a more complete charge curve?
Typically the highest charging speed is achieved when the battery is at less than 20% or so, depending on the car. From a certain point it'll start slowing down so starting the charge at 50% is not a good idea to test the charge speed.
@@alanj7306 18min plus fumbling with a phone app for several minutes to begin the charge cycle. Lets not forget the sales tax or "road tax" they add per Kwh of about 2.5 cents, so about $1.15 here. Funny they never mentioned this, he only did a simple calculation and did not show the actual payment total for this charge. Soon they will add even more taxes to EV charging stations.
@@alanj7306 The fixation on DC fast charging is kind of absurd since almost all charging is done from level 2 AC, in a parking spot, during downtime. Sure, grabbing diesel is a 10 minute stop, but that's going to be a ten minute stop every single time you need fuel, whereas an electric truck takes all of 5 seconds to connect in your driveway or garage once a week, then left to charge overnight while its not in use anyways. As an aside, I think we'd be better off taking a look at a lighter and more efficient trucks like the upcoming F150 lightning or Silverado EV to actually gauge what DC fast charging is like for a more practical truck - the old Hummer H3 truck isn't exactly a marvel of efficient truck design and got about 340 miles on a 23 gallon tank - pretty crappy for a truck. I suspect this EV version will be similar in the EV world, just an inefficient charge-chugger.
The Hummer is awesome but a major flaw: not affordable for the masses. With the results of Democrats policies causing massive rising cost of gasoline, diesel, food, utilities etc. hyperinflation, the masses can’t save enough $ to afford one; the paradox of the Democrat’s Green New Forced Bankruptcy Deal. At this point voting for a Democrat again is stupid is as stupid does. Don’t be stupid.
@@icare7151 Mmmm, I'm not going to get into a political conversation so this is the last message about politics I'm going to write but can you tell us how the government in the US creates as well "massive rising cost of gasoline, diesel, food, utilities etc. hyperinflation," in Europe as well? Because it's happening in the whole World for obvious reasons...
2:36 Okay, so you started the charge at over 50%, which is not going to give you very good numbers, and the HUMMER EV is unlikely to reach its peak at that battery percentage, even if the battery is conditioned.
0:39 I love that GMC didn’t leave out the automatic door lock feature on the Hummer EV twins as well. I love that feature on my Impala. Just walk away - small but actually very convenient.
Check to be sure you’re on a 500amp capable station. EA has derated a lot of their 350kw units to 350amps due to equipment issues… thus these high power 400v and 800v cars will never be able to pull max speed regardless of ratings. In addition to achieving said higher speeds at lower states of charge, of course.
@@TFLtruck talk to Kyle Connor at outofspec reviews. Guy and his team is anEV genius. He has talked about the ampage of station and he does full charge curve testing 0 to 100 and explains these things better
@@richardroberson9277 no there are going to be fights/stabbings/shootings over them , just wait. And homeless people will fook with them while you are gone. Tampering with them.
Thanks for the review. Quick calculation in my head, this is still much cheaper to power than my 2021 Raptor on 37s. I get 13.5 mpg. Just paid $4.35 per gallon. So it cost me $25.13 to go 78 miles vs $14.25 in Hummer. And the Hummer is much faster. Great information. Also much cheaper to charge at home, I pay about $0.15 per kWh at home. So about half price to drive around town vs road trips.
Going to be a lot of different expectations going to electric. I liked the real world test- thought the results would better however- 78 miles for 15 minutes is slow in my opinion
Here in Olathe, KS I avg. about $0.11 per Kwh so cost per mile would be even better, however my GMC Sierra is paid for so for me the cost of a new $115K electric truck would be a terrible idea based on cost/mile.
@@SkeldZ06 Around mid October a comparison showed, On a yearly basis, assuming the mid-priced cars traveled 12,000 miles, it would cost $1,030 to drive an internal combustion car and $1,554 to drive an EV. For luxury cars that get 26 miles per gallon and using premium gas at $3.25 a gallon, the cost to drive an internal combustion car 100 miles is $12.60. The cost to drive a luxury EV, such as a Taycan, Tesla Model S or X or Jaguar I-Pace, is $15.52 to travel 100 miles. That is using mostly commercial chargers. “That’s apples to apples and includes the extra EV taxes, the commercial charging and the home charging and the allowance of driving to a gas station, which, for most Americans, is very short compared to driving to a commercial charger for an EV owner.
What’s nice about EVs is that you charge it at night (cheaper than during the day) and you wake up every day with a full battery. How many times do you drive over 300 miles a day?
Yes, This is what buyers would like to see. Bjørn Nyland does this for many EVs. If GM was serious about competing with Norway for EVs, they need to sell the Hummer there, and then Bjørn can test it. 😀
I just watched a video that featured a new EV Hummer that was at 4%, when plugged in to home electric, it estimated 4 days until fully charged. Pretty handy.
@@carlosf.7158 it's a long time, but if you always keep it plugged in while at home it'll be fine, for me anyway. That's at least 10 hours of charging per day I'd imagine for most people.
That's fake news. The longest I've seen from a 120v outlet is 30 hours, which is practically 1 day. The 240V outlet takes 8 hours to fully charge the car.
0:45 That might not actually be the maximum charging speed of the GMC HUMMER EV. More likely, that is due to the equipment's limitation. The HUMMER EV's pack is a double-stacked version of the Cadillac LYRIQ's pack, which has a peak charging speed of 190 kW, so the HUMMER EV's theoretical max charge rate is 380 kW. The problem is, the LYRIQ requires a full 500 A of current to achieve 190 kW, and that amount of current is not currently available on these chargers when operating between 500 V and 1000 V.
I have an idea set up an antenna running to the charging port and camp out in a thunderstorm. You might be able to reach those charging levels for a second or two.
@@michaelbassett5105 I think the term you are looking for is "lightning rod," but I guess that's what you get by attempting to learn about electricity on Saturday morning cartoons. 🤦♂ Right now, the GMC HUMMER EV's realistic peak charging speeds will likely be around 320 to 330 kW on the existing 350 kW DC fast charging infrastructure. When charging providers start adding enough modules to provide 500 A at 1000 V, we should see about a 50 to 60 kW bump in peak charging speeds.
5:39 That's going to be very helpful because right now, EV owners are having to guess whether there is a factor affecting their car's maximum charge or an issue with the charger itself. This will save people a lot of time charger hopping if they aren't seeing the speeds they expect to be seeing.
@@chunkychuck Yeah, and even then, you'd need to know the parameters. Hopefully, it also reduces confusion for people who plug into 50 kW chargers and wonder why they aren't seeing advertised charging speeds.
Yeah while your hopping around getting to know all the chargers in your town maybe you will run into some of the other suckers that got electric toys and you can chat it up about how much money you are gonna save after you spent 100k to have the honor to wait at charging station for three hours to save 20$
@@michaelbassett5105 You don't seem to know anything about EVs. Public chargers are for convenience and road trips, not cost savings. My Chevy Bolt EV costs me 2 cents per mile to charge at home. Why would I go out of my way to spend 8 cents per mile on a public charger? And in the case of the HUMMER EV, do you really think that stopping for 30 minutes for every 7 hours of driving is a huge sacrifice? Most people will stop for at least 30 minutes over the course of a 500-mile drive. 🙄
Very interesting. Good video. We just did a 1500 mile trip in a Tesla model 3 and observed max charge rates when we started with a battery down at 20% or below. Overall, surprisingly easy and convenient to travel with fast charging.
@@jasonbowman7190 on our trip, the typical supercharger stop was 20 to 25 minutes and cost around $11 - $12. I don’t have home charge costs calculated, but it is quite a bit lower than supercharging. This car gets a lot of free charging while at work (which offers that service). Either way, much lower cost than a comparable fuel purchase.
@@jasonbowman7190 I charge at home mostly. It is $0.05/kwhr in the summer off peak and $0.03 off peak in the winter. On average 1000 miles is roughly $12. Way cheaper than using a charging station. Model Y performance. I average about 4 miles per kwhr
What is promising about it? Its only remarkable capability is to charge at 1000v, yet that likely won’t be possible on vehicles with smaller packs such as equinox.
this...is horrible performance. a 18" thick 200kwh battery pack is taking less power than a 40,000$ model 3 80kwh pack from 2018. unless this is sarcasm lol
@@richardroberson9277 this video wasn't done under normal conditions so of course charging was slower. But Ultium can charge up to 350 kW beating Tesla since their proprietary connector can't handle that high power without overheating
This EV movement is fun to watch and very fascinating. Hopefully within 2-3 generations they have faster charging and more importantly range. Real world range is just where I want it to be to feel confident and comfortable.
@@alanj7306 You're right. Most EVs aren't ideal cross-country road-trippers yet. When you're charging at theses stations, you're paying extra for the convenience and to fund construction of more chargers. Give it 5 or 10 years for the improved infrastructure and next-generation vehicles to really be more accepted by the general public.
@@richardroberson9277, Tesla is in an entirely different class compared to nearly every other EV in multiple areas. Charging is probably the most obvious of those differences. Even the Model 3 LR can charge at a higher rate than this, despite having a battery 1/3rd the size. The Model 3 LR can also charge at several hundred miles per hour of charging so it's not just the top of the line Teslas. It's all modern Teslas. I don't know what GM was thinking taking their most inefficient vehicle of all time and deciding to make one of their first EVs out of it. It earned a reputation for being a vehicle for people that are proud to waste money. It only had a few good years of sales at a time when gas was super cheap and the brand died quickly (and was viewed by many as a sign of stupidity) when gas prices went to $4 per gallon in ~2007. This, and large super duty trucks used for towing, are the worst case scenario for EVs. I think GM is going to sell very few of these. Really bad product choice that was probably made by some MBA, bean counter, or marketing schmuck that was given a leadership position.
Agree although I think it’s a bit of a gimmick. They’re over pricing these vehicles like crazy you spend 110000 msrp and if you look online they’re going for 188000 to save money on gas? Haha we fall for anything
78 miles added. Real world usable amount is probably closer to 70. At $14.25/70 miles=$0.203/mile. For comparison, my ‘17 Escalade ESV does 20mpg hand calculated, at $4.50/gallon=$0.225/mile. Over a year of driving 8000 miles for me equals a savings of $176/year. Charging at home would cost about ~1/4 of the $0.31 the DC fast charge cost, at $0.08/Kwh, for a savings of $1381/year or $115/month.
Even when you save $1381 per year it would take at least 10 years to recover the extra cost of EV... if the government really wanted to care about climate change, they would grant more money incentives than what they offer now in rebates to make the vehicle cost the same as its ICE counter part... Thanks for doing the math on this.. no one ever seems to compare charging cost to gas cost much.
Matt and JH doesn’t really know what they’re comparing this truck to. The closest gas truck that we can compare it to is a Ram TRX which is over $100k with all the crazy markups currently at the dealerships. Also your 2017 Escalade getting 20mpg is BS.
The cost is getting insane...it is the same cost per mile as my Ford Raptor at $4/gallon of gas...home charging in my area cuts that down tremendously but it is pretty ridiculous.
@@TFLtruck True EA uses different vendors their ABB units are often limited to 350A. EVgo has some 500A units that might be good. Finding the GM "Ultium" sponsored sites will likely be able to max out the charge rate.
2:00 Oh, come on, GM! The flap on the Chevrolet Bolt EV's CCS port was by far the best DC pin covering option. This plug cap looks ridiculously difficult to work with.
@@WheresHerb Ease of use has nothing to do with being smart. Andre knows how to use a basic plug cap, but that doesn't make it any easier with a phone in one hand and a CCS plug in the other.
@@richardroberson9277 Identical to what? This is definitely not the same 150 A CCS socket that is used in the Bolt EV. This one looks like a beefed up Phoenix Contact CCS socket, rated for a continuous 500 A DC and 80 A AC.
50% isn't really that high. The battery in this vehicle is enormous. It's 3 times the size of a Model 3 Long Range battery (~212kWh vs ~72kWh). The Model 3 LR can charge at over 100kW all the way up to 70%. With a 3x larger battery pack, the Hummer EV should be able to do 300kW+ all the way up to 70%, but instead it's struggling to break 200kW at 50%. It's not clear if the bottleneck is the vehicle or the charger, but either way this will be the consumer's experience. I don't expect them to match Tesla, but this doesn't even look close. I guess we'll find out more if they do a more thorough test starting with a lower SOC and different chargers, but it's not looking great in this limited test.
The energy cost using that charging station at 31¢/kWh is not much less than the cost of gas. I'm an EV fan, but, there's a reason for the slow adoption rate. The cost differential of a new EV far exceeds the energy savings.
350,000 watts per hour 350kw. That's a shit load of electricity. It's going to add more to your electric bill then it would with filling up gasoline. Once you past 2 or 3 tier electric rates then double and triple in price per Kw.
Wow 45.9 kW filled an 82 mile gap in charge. Even with the Hummer EV using some of power to condition or cool the battery during charging, that puts it well under the 2 mile/kWh line. Slurping electrons!! Thank you for the first look, Andre. Good to see the real deal and what its like!
With weight and aero like this, I'm not surprised. Even the BMW i4 has a hard time getting to 3 miles per kwh at speed, and it's an ICE converted sport sedan. The most comparable EV currently out there would probably be the Rivian. Based on my EV experience, I'd expect this vehicle to use 500 to 700 wh/mi at 70-75MPH.
Lowkey 14.25 for 75 miles is almost the same as my Acura gets with the high gas prices and taking premium gas. Full supporter of electric vehicles but I was surprised at the price to charge this one.
This is the least efficient electric vehicle. It’s MPG rating is like 45 MPGe. It’s a horrible product from GM. Probably cause more environmental harm than your Acura that gets 25-30 MPG
Too many videos focus on the cost of public charging as if that’s what you’d usually do. Inadvertently spreading EV FUD. Most charging is done at home where the cost is much, much lower (like 2 cents per mile for a normal sized vehicle).
@@martinmcandrew1377 Yep, I did a 1500 mile road trip in our model Y. Tesla’s superchargers were awesome. We hit 249kw several times. But the point I was making is that most EV owners charge overnight at home most of the time. The cost of public charging does not represent the normal daily charging cost. I worry that the EV curious will see videos like this one and say “well that’s no better than gas”
Interesting video with a focus on the speed but what about the expense? $14 for 78 miles of range? At $4/gallon and 20mpg you'd have only spent $16 for basically the same range, and would have been in and out in 5 minutes with a full tank. Personally I value my time at more than $2/hr. And of course this is before the government achieves critical electric vehicle mass and starts levying comparable taxes on electricity as they do for gas (California is already partially doing this). At which point you'll have price parity or worse. And let's not forget the cost of entry here at over $100k. I don't get it.
When was the last time you took a road trip much more than 300 miles one way? Personally I think it was in… 2016? And that’s despite having road tripped to Yellowstone, Moab, etc in the meantime. Remember home charge is dirt cheap.
@@bob15479 That argument only holds water for affluent people with freestanding homes. That is not relevant to mass EV adoption. How many people own their home and can spend $100k+ on an EV. Most people rent, typically apartments, and won't have a nice garage to park and plug in. They live in cities and this is exactly where they'll be charging.
78 Miles in 12 mins is pretty impressive. Let’s compare it to its closest gas truck competitor the RAM TRX, which avg 11mpg (if you’re babying it). At 78 miles that’s about 7 gallons of gas in the TRX. National “premium” gas prices is around $5. So let’s take 7 gallons x $5 would be $35 for the TRX compared to $14.25 for Hummer Ev. $0.31 is pretty expensive compared to home charging which avg $0.10-$0.20 per kwh if you’re on the grid. People who are off grid with solar $0. Also, some charging stations offer 1-3 hours free charging at 6 kwh which isn’t fast but better than having to pay.
@@michaelbassett5105 Vampire drain? Not really an issue. Just left our EV unplugged for 5 days and didn't see any loss at the airport. Nor has it been an issue with any EV we've owned. .... Let it sit for a month or two and the story may be different.
And when you figure in the additional cost to purchase, it will cost more to operate than a gas vehicle. Not to mention that the electricity is most likely being generated by coal or natural gas. Now add the additional pollution to make the lithium batteries, they are not eco friendly
@@sptrader6316 I think that was partly the point. You’re going to spend LOTS of *time* refilling at the gas stations if you own a TRX. So I agree, your time _is_ worth something. Your *money* is worth something too and you’re spending more money at the pump in a TRX. Your purchased *experience* is worth something too. Time it takes to refuel/recharge shouldn’t be the only measurement for convenience.
Dayum. GM hiring video game designers to do their software was a smart move. Those menus and graphical interfaces make the screens in the Mach-E, Model Y, and Polestar 2 look like 1980s Atari.
This is at a GM first drive event. Andre did the best he could with the time allowed to him. To get the charge down below 20% would've taken another hundred-something miles and almost two hours of additional time he likely didn't have at the event.
@@jakelee5456 incorrect. either he doesnt understand charging rates and EVs (bad since this is their EV channel), or he knew he wouldnt see max speed given 50% and amp limit but played dumb (still bad as this is just stoking the why ev no work side)....
Wait till those government taxes/fees/electricity price increases kick in. So at $14 you got about a 100 miles. That's roughly 3.25 gallons of gas where I live, my vehicle gets 30 mpg . 3.25x30= 98.5 miles. Savings?
What about the much higher initial cost for the EV. I don't see much savings + you have to deal with "range anxiety" trying to find the "right" charger, especially if you're on a trip. Then there's the time wasted charging. The tech isn't there yet for me.
@sptrader same here. I live in very rural area and unless I spend $2-3,000 to upgrade and install a charger unit at home a EV just isn't practical for me.
I love how people are skipping over the fact that they are paying MORE then gas now. I can't believe how many people really believed that charging would never be as expensive as gas.
Huh? I am on my 2nd EV, and ordered a EV Truck. I charge 95% at home, my electricity hasn't gone up at all in the 4 years I've had an electric car. It costs me ~2.14USD to drive 72 miles (round trip commute). How is that more than gas? Fast charging at a Supercharger isn't as cheap, but it's at least half the cost of gas, on the conservative side. What am I missing???
@@Cjdergrosse you just said it, you charge at home. There are literally 1000s of EV and Tesla owners that don't charge their cars at home. They look at that $14 bill and think there paying half but don't put 2 and 2 together that they only got 80 miles for that money. My hybrid gets over 100 miles for that same amount of money.
Did some quick calculations - the recharge will cost you about $0.19/mile. My 2010 costs me about $0.24/mile at $4 gas here in Iowa. And I can fill up my tank in under 8 minutes when close to empty.
I noticed in one of the videos that they guys were having an issue with the folding mirrors. I have noticed on my Hummer ED1 that my mirrors only auto fold when I lock the truck from either the remote or by pushing the lock button on the door handle. Hope this helps if they are still trying to figure this out.
I would like to see a gas powered Silverado and a EV Silverado drive across the country leaving the same starting, the same route, and same finish point! LA to NY. Interesting to see what the time taken for said trip, the cost to refuel and recharge, and overall performance.
Its great you can use chargers at the places you are visiting for more than couple hrs or so. But if you going to make a quick pit stop to charge for a few miles to you destination, thats the question I would like to know. Gas its like 5-7 mins fill and you're off. Don't worry about filling up until the tank is 1/4 tank or close to empty. I would rather get a Hummer Hybrid with a V8.
Good to know that the charging speed from over 50% state of charge is decent for the Ultium platform. This should be the same battery as in the Chevy Silverado EV I ordered, but the Chev is a bit more efficient.
So over $14 for a whopping 78 miles of range!?! All in 18 minutes. I can fill up my Hyundai Sonata Hybrid in about 4 minutes, pay about $40 and get over 500 miles of range. So that Hummer is actually less efficient and more expensive to fill up than my Hybrid. Not impressed.
At the end of the day, you're still comparing an aerodynamic, relatively small car to a 9,000 lb tank. No one said this thing was going to be cheap or efficient
Dramatically slow it down. Think of your cell phone battery when it's hot. However these batteries are temperature controlled so it's not as if it wouldn't charge at all. I would assume it would charge at roughly 50% rated speed
Can you charge when it's thunder an lightning out. Is it safe to hook up the charger cord in thunder storms. Because we've always been taught water an electric don't mix.
VERY Suspicious that you have to 'calculate' what it cost for charging... 🤔 Also: $14.25/78 mi = $0.18 per mile. Not great. (Ya Ya I Know, "But it's better when you charge overnight at home")
Your videos have convinced me to go look at the hummer over a Cybertruck. The charging was my biggest issue. The US has to do better for other vehicles. Tesla owns the market in this and I’d like to be fully electric but not fully Tesla. I love my X but mainly for the FSD. This charging system is great tho.
The fact the Hummer charged from only half charged to 75% in less than 20 mins is actually pretty impressive since these are usually the *slowest* examples of fast charging rates.
@@richardroberson9277 Lmdao. Yeah, I wonder what the Ford Lightning’s range is while towing something 7,000 lbs. It doesn’t weigh anywhere near 9,000 lbs either. 😂
Peak charge rate is usually between 25-40% SOC. During 55-75% charge, you are probably not getting the max charging rate. Above 75%, charge rate drops quite fast, and above 90%, it's usually a waste of time charging.
From zero to 30 percent it can charge at 350kW. Then 30 to 40 percent is about 250kW. Then after that it settles in around 170kW. I think the throttling factor is the thermal management of the battery system.
I heard many of Electrify America's 350kW chargers can't charge at that rate. They need an updated module to get to that true 350kW speed. EA is working on replacing those on their chargers.
I just calculated the cost for me to go 78 miles in my Volkswagen Jetta Tdi Sportwagen on bio-diesel that I made myself from used vegetable oil was free.
Chargers are often 1000volt at 350 amp aka theoretically 350 kW. But since it is 0nly pulling 800 volts and even that gets throttled down to 80% you would see around 225 to 280 kW top speed. Also top speed is seen around 10% and then drops 55% battery capacity at 178 kW is very good. I just spent 1 hour 15 minutes adding 25 kW to my Chevy Bolt EV. Man what i would do to do it in 8 minutes.... :)
Max charging rate will be with a depleted battery that is pre heated for charging. So 53% charges battery isn’t close to 0%. So your results are not bad.
This might be the first car review I’ve seen with a successful session of charging from an EA station. Albeit slow. Public charging other than Tesla is a joke.
I charge at EA all the time with my Ioniq5 its very fast I reach 240kw on the 350s and 178kw on the 150s 10%-80% in 17 minutes exactly what Hyundai claims I got several times. I wouldn't call this successful it was slow.
The cost to charge was more then I thought it would be. But calculate in maintenance cost running ice vs ev and the ev will be ahead. They have a long way to go on the charging network and battery chemistry before I go for one.
I got 2 things out of this - the Hummer EV has battery preconditioning (this is good!) and it functions on Electrify America (I’d hope so, but sometimes new models have issues). $0.31/kWh is totally acceptable for DCFC. This is a joke of a charging test starting at 50+%. Do better, TFL.
I was told by Ryan Shaw tech the hummer EV has dumb range and should take longer to charge due to using a bigger batter to get more range rather than making the EV more efficient so you can get more range with a smaller battery (keeping in mind this is a truck so won't have the best coeffecicint of drag). Looks like it can charge pretty fast. But a bigger battery would also cost more to charge all the way.
Hummers in general were never very cheap to travel 75 miles, but still cheaper than mine. My Escalade gets 9mpg on an average day which means traveling 75 miles uses about 8 gallons. If I fill up using regular 87 gas at $3.71 a gallon (I just filled up today 1/27/2023) that would cost me about $30 in my Escalade. The BEST mpg I've gotten on a tank is 12mpg which would mean traveling 75 miles = 6.25 gallons = $23... This bougie Hummer EV is still cheaper than my truck lol.
Will the grid handle ALL cars being EV? Elon Musk has said that the entire US electrical power requirement could be supplied by one 300x300 mile area of solar panels. I thought "whaaat, no way" so I did the math and it is very conservatively true. Home charging currently is about one third of the charge cost in this video. I believe that it is not emphasized enough that home charging will be the vast majority of all electrical vehicle charging, not roadside charging (I also believe that the convenience of home charging will easily counterbalance the inconvenience of much less frequent roadside charging (not for trucking though, hmm)). Lucky enough, home charging almost always takes place overnight when the grid is not highly used. I haven't but someone should do the math of how much electrical power it would take for all electrical power consumption, including the charging of ALL vehicles being electric, overnight versus the typical overall daytime consumption. The rough math is not actually too hard to do. The current grid at current max use likely has a relatively small buffer to overload. If the calculated overnight factor (including all EVs charging) exceeds the current daytime max then the grid has to be upgraded. I haven't done the math, the factor could be even or it could be 5 or 20 times. If the grid has to be upgraded then you can bet the cost of at home charging will rapidly be increased to likely even more than the current fuel costs. I highly suspect that reduced cost to the consumer will NOT ultimately be a benefit for EV conversion but more likely will be justification by the powers that be to increase the "fuel" cost of vehicle travel! Someone has to do that math.
The one figure I saw was around ~30% adoption rate before electrical grids will need significant upsizing. I think that 30% will take a while even as popular as EV's are right now. What is it now like 1-2% only in the US? The same argument was made back when central AC was getting popular. All these homes built in the 50s-70s with only 60A electrical service couldn't handle central AC without compromise. Everything back to the utility needed to be slowly upgraded as AC got more and more popular. Same will need to happen with EVs. I've noticed that when new major powerlines are being built, they are usually only 1/2 or 1/3 populated. I assume that's on purpose so if demand keeps increasing they can just add more transmission wires. And maybe a good solution is for utility companies to offer significant discounts on rates and charging equipment if you only install 30A of charging or less. Which should be fine for most, and would probably stretch out the time needed to upgrade utilities by a large margin. Maybe that could support 50% EV adoption if the majority only had 30A charge circuits. 24A is all I charge my Model 3 at, and my daily commute is 120mi. That recharges in 6-7hrs overnight depending on how cold it is. However, if vehicles like this Hummer or other full size electric trucks with 150kWh+ packs get popular and households get more than one large EV, a single 30A circuit isn't going to be enough. But a household with 2 standard sized cars could, especially if both vehicles only travel ~50mi a day.
@@andrewt9204 I took a closer look at reports and there is a full range of expectations. Most are positive and say only typical upgrades necessary but others say otherwise. I don't think I heard of the possibility of rolling blackouts in North America, due to electrical supply, until the last couple of years (without EVs). The grid has to support the absolute worst case at all times, especially if transportation is included. If there is already problems occurring then all vehicles as EVs seems like it will make matters much worse. Some say EVs will improve the grid by acting as available stored power for those problem points but I really don't think people will take too kindly to only a 75% charge in their cars because it's a hot day when they expect 100% (when they need the charge most themselves). It will be interesting......
Come to Pennsylvania or any of the northern states and do that. Most of the country has 4 distinct seasons so being able to see how fast it can charge in cold weather would be a great test.
I'd love to adopt this new technology and my home electricity cost is only about $0.11/Kwh on average and as low as $0.08, but since my truck is paid off none of that matters. I can't afford a $115K truck. I wonder if the dealers will be marking them up even higher and our of reach for most folks?
Station is fully capable of 350kW; the battery is not. In fact, NO battery on the market is capable of consistant 350kW charging from 0% to 100%. You did charge at a higher percentage so if you were at say 20% you may see those speeds but only momentarily. The only car that can get remotely close to those speeds for an extended period is the Lucid Air and even then with a 900V battery gets around 300-310kW.
just like most EVs. Full charging speed is only available when the battery is at a lower stated capacity, at the begining of charging session. In ideal weather conditions.
If it becomes normal to charge EVs at 350 kW or more, I wonder how that will effect (no pun intended) the grid. Is it in needs of upgrades? Maybe not now, but if we say 1/3 of the vehicles on the road is electric 20 years from now, are we making the necessary preparations? 🧐
A popular option for new stations is to have a large battery pack that shaves off the peak demands so that there is less strain on the grid. But yes, udating the grid is definitely something we need to keep in mind.
@@prerunnerwannabe Which is a terrible idea. Batteries have little scalability, so charging will cost you more. At $14.25/78 miles, it's already expensive.
@@AkioWasRight it's really the wild west out there for costs at charging stations. Where I live EA charges 57c a min for 350kw, while a competitor charges 27c for the same speed.
@@AkioWasRight That's not the whole picture. If the grid connection has to be upgraded to handle the power of a fast charging station, that costs an absolutely massive amount of money and time. Additionally, every month any fast charging station has to pay a peak demand charge which is often $20 per kW. Meaning that if at one point during the month the station pulls 1000 kW of power, they will have to pay the utility company $20,000 dollars on top of the normal electricity cost.
@@AkioWasRight it's a bad example because the Hummer is pretty inefficient -- most EVs would have gotten more than 78miles in that time and/or it wouldn't have cost $14.28 for 78 miles. $.31kw --- so $14.25 is about 46kwh -- more than half of most EVs battery capacity.
So, for putting things in perspective, he added 45.95 kW into the battery in 18 minutes, which means it charged in average at a speed of 153 kW starting from 53% SOC to 75% SOC. This charging speed is way above what a Tesla can do at the same SOC. Tesla is around 80 kW average charging speed from 53% to 75%. So the Hammer charges two times faster than the Tesla M3. If the Hammer was a lower SOC (state of charge), I am sure the average speed would have been above 200 kW, which in 18 mins would add 60 kWh in the battery. For a total of 18$ for about 100 miles. A truck of same size as the Hammer would be rated at 15-20 mpg. That's 5 x 5.084 $ (Diesel) = 25 $.
I like how when it’s a Legacy auto manufacturer that’s failing to meet expectations they are always on a positive note on TFL. If this was a Tesla failing to reach charging capacity or even remotely close to it they would’ve thrown Tesla under the bus. This is also another consideration of super heavy EV‘s is charge times will be near double because consumption is near doubled. Small EV‘s will charge faster than large EV’s from the owners perspective.
Very true. It's not just this channel though. It seems almost everyone wants to give the benefit of the doubt to legacy auto even though it's obvious they are failing to produce compelling (or sometimes even mediocre) EVs. Meanwhile, they'll nitpick everything about a Tesla and hold it to a completely different standard. That would be fine if they acknowledged that Tesla sets the standard and they expect more from it. However, it's presented more like, "Tesla earns a B- grade because it doesn't have a plastic divider in this storage compartment to hold my lunchbox. GM gets an A because they managed to make it charge slowly."
why would you start the charge at 53 % start it at 10% or 5% if you want to see the charge speed
What if someone is at 50% and they need a full charge before they cross an area with no place to re-charge? Like on a trip across the mountains or bfe?
But at the same time I do understand what you're saying about getting the fastest charge
Because it's a press event and that's what they got.
@@ColeSpolaric Exactly. They filmed what they could in the situation they were in. Good stuff.
@@tjmakings watch OutOfSpec Motoring road trips on Rivian he took it across the CO mountain pass when head3d to AZ. He explains charging and EV road trips route planning better than anyone
The 100mi estimate is most likely at a lower soc since the batteries charge faster at a lower % and start slowing down as they get full.
Yes. that is the what most OEMs quote. Surprised the tester did not know about this.
@@ravitoday Same tester that calls a straight 7% grade "The world's toughest towing test" It is a breeze. Not a test at all.
@@ravitoday Of course, the tested knew about this. Like I said - this was an impromptu test during a first drive event. Not enough time to verify a more complete charge curve?
@@geraldkoth654 7% at that elevation is not a breeze.
@@TFLtruck Thanks for the clarification.
I stand corrected. Hoping to see the complete charging curve.
It’s 2:30 and it says it’ll be fully charged at 3:50, screw that and you still have to pay! I’ll stick with gas.
Typically the highest charging speed is achieved when the battery is at less than 20% or so, depending on the car. From a certain point it'll start slowing down so starting the charge at 50% is not a good idea to test the charge speed.
@@alanj7306 Thanks for doing the math. Makes sense on decision of electric or gas much more straight forward.
@@alanj7306 18min plus fumbling with a phone app for several minutes to begin the charge cycle. Lets not forget the sales tax or "road tax" they add per Kwh of about 2.5 cents, so about $1.15 here. Funny they never mentioned this, he only did a simple calculation and did not show the actual payment total for this charge. Soon they will add even more taxes to EV charging stations.
@@alanj7306 The fixation on DC fast charging is kind of absurd since almost all charging is done from level 2 AC, in a parking spot, during downtime. Sure, grabbing diesel is a 10 minute stop, but that's going to be a ten minute stop every single time you need fuel, whereas an electric truck takes all of 5 seconds to connect in your driveway or garage once a week, then left to charge overnight while its not in use anyways. As an aside, I think we'd be better off taking a look at a lighter and more efficient trucks like the upcoming F150 lightning or Silverado EV to actually gauge what DC fast charging is like for a more practical truck - the old Hummer H3 truck isn't exactly a marvel of efficient truck design and got about 340 miles on a 23 gallon tank - pretty crappy for a truck. I suspect this EV version will be similar in the EV world, just an inefficient charge-chugger.
The Hummer is awesome but a major flaw: not affordable for the masses.
With the results of Democrats policies causing massive rising cost of gasoline, diesel, food, utilities etc. hyperinflation, the masses can’t save enough $ to afford one; the paradox of the Democrat’s Green New Forced Bankruptcy Deal.
At this point voting for a Democrat again is stupid is as stupid does. Don’t be stupid.
@@icare7151 Mmmm, I'm not going to get into a political conversation so this is the last message about politics I'm going to write but can you tell us how the government in the US creates as well "massive rising cost of gasoline, diesel, food, utilities etc. hyperinflation," in Europe as well? Because it's happening in the whole World for obvious reasons...
As others have said, a SOC between 5 and 10% and a fully preconditioned battery in ideal climate (60-70 degrees) will net you the ideal charging rate.
And no offense, if you are going to be hosting an EV channel, these are things you should mention when doing a charging video.
@@dudefjdfkhllkj Well, he said he was going to do a complete video later.
2:36 Okay, so you started the charge at over 50%, which is not going to give you very good numbers, and the HUMMER EV is unlikely to reach its peak at that battery percentage, even if the battery is conditioned.
0:39 I love that GMC didn’t leave out the automatic door lock feature on the Hummer EV twins as well. I love that feature on my Impala. Just walk away - small but actually very convenient.
This makes me super excited to go get 2 diesel trucks and have them for the rest of my life
😆😆👍👍
Ha Ha
I could not agree more
You’re getting ripped off then
Honestly that sounds like a plan 👍🤔
Check to be sure you’re on a 500amp capable station. EA has derated a lot of their 350kw units to 350amps due to equipment issues… thus these high power 400v and 800v cars will never be able to pull max speed regardless of ratings. In addition to achieving said higher speeds at lower states of charge, of course.
yep. its virtually certain that this is the issue since i don't think that hummers battery pack was hot at the time of charging.
How do you check if it's a 500 amp or a 350 amp EA station? We think all EA stations are currently limited to 350 amp.
Yeah this is the right answer. EVGO has the 500amp stations
@@TFLtruck talk to Kyle Connor at outofspec reviews. Guy and his team is anEV genius. He has talked about the ampage of station and he does full charge curve testing 0 to 100 and explains these things better
Imagine if additional demand were present and everyone wanted to charge, you'd be sitting there for 2 hours
maybe theyd.............................................build more chargers then?
@@richardroberson9277 no there are going to be fights/stabbings/shootings over them , just wait. And homeless people will fook with them while you are gone. Tampering with them.
@@richardroberson9277 Also better build more power plants, preferable cheap and efficient nuclear power, or you will get power outages.
Could you run the math by us? Just wanted to check your math and make sure your not taking out of your asd. Thanks
Thanks for the review. Quick calculation in my head, this is still much cheaper to power than my 2021 Raptor on 37s. I get 13.5 mpg. Just paid $4.35 per gallon. So it cost me $25.13 to go 78 miles vs $14.25 in Hummer. And the Hummer is much faster. Great information. Also much cheaper to charge at home, I pay about $0.15 per kWh at home. So about half price to drive around town vs road trips.
Going to be a lot of different expectations going to electric. I liked the real world test- thought the results would better however- 78 miles for 15 minutes is slow in my opinion
Gasoline is at a historic high. The EV would be more expensive in this particular case if gas was $2.00 a gallon.
Here in Olathe, KS I avg. about $0.11 per Kwh so cost per mile would be even better, however my GMC Sierra is paid for so for me the cost of a new $115K electric truck would be a terrible idea based on cost/mile.
@@SkeldZ06 Around mid October a comparison showed, On a yearly basis, assuming the mid-priced cars traveled 12,000 miles, it would cost $1,030 to drive an internal combustion car and $1,554 to drive an EV.
For luxury cars that get 26 miles per gallon and using premium gas at $3.25 a gallon, the cost to drive an internal combustion car 100 miles is $12.60. The cost to drive a luxury EV, such as a Taycan, Tesla Model S or X or Jaguar I-Pace, is $15.52 to travel 100 miles. That is using mostly commercial chargers.
“That’s apples to apples and includes the extra EV taxes, the commercial charging and the home charging and the allowance of driving to a gas station, which, for most Americans, is very short compared to driving to a commercial charger for an EV owner.
What’s nice about EVs is that you charge it at night (cheaper than during the day) and you wake up every day with a full battery. How many times do you drive over 300 miles a day?
Will be interesting to see a more complete charging cycle from a low SoC to, say, 80 or 90%
Didn't have enough time to get the battery low enough and then charge it. Will do more testing soon.
DC fast charging like that isn’t really the way to do it. 5-70% is what I shoot for in my mach E If the routing allows
Yes, This is what buyers would like to see. Bjørn Nyland does this for many EVs. If GM was serious about competing with Norway for EVs, they need to sell the Hummer there, and then Bjørn can test it. 😀
I just watched a video that featured a new EV Hummer that was at 4%, when plugged in to home electric, it estimated 4 days until fully charged. Pretty handy.
In all fairness, that was with 120v but the guy also has a Level 2 charger (220v) and it was over 24hrs to charge that Hummer. That's just crazy.
@@carlosf.7158 it's a long time, but if you always keep it plugged in while at home it'll be fine, for me anyway. That's at least 10 hours of charging per day I'd imagine for most people.
That's fake news. The longest I've seen from a 120v outlet is 30 hours, which is practically 1 day. The 240V outlet takes 8 hours to fully charge the car.
This vehicle is not a cost cutting electric vehicle.
A Hummer will never be a cost cutting vehicle.
0:45 That might not actually be the maximum charging speed of the GMC HUMMER EV. More likely, that is due to the equipment's limitation. The HUMMER EV's pack is a double-stacked version of the Cadillac LYRIQ's pack, which has a peak charging speed of 190 kW, so the HUMMER EV's theoretical max charge rate is 380 kW. The problem is, the LYRIQ requires a full 500 A of current to achieve 190 kW, and that amount of current is not currently available on these chargers when operating between 500 V and 1000 V.
I have an idea set up an antenna running to the charging port and camp out in a thunderstorm. You might be able to reach those charging levels for a second or two.
@@michaelbassett5105 I think the term you are looking for is "lightning rod," but I guess that's what you get by attempting to learn about electricity on Saturday morning cartoons. 🤦♂
Right now, the GMC HUMMER EV's realistic peak charging speeds will likely be around 320 to 330 kW on the existing 350 kW DC fast charging infrastructure. When charging providers start adding enough modules to provide 500 A at 1000 V, we should see about a 50 to 60 kW bump in peak charging speeds.
@@newscoulomb3705 well we are talking about “electric toys” so...
@@michaelbassett5105 Certainly. It's better for children to play with electric toys than the gas-powered toys they are currently playing with.
@@newscoulomb3705 good point I concur!
5:39 That's going to be very helpful because right now, EV owners are having to guess whether there is a factor affecting their car's maximum charge or an issue with the charger itself. This will save people a lot of time charger hopping if they aren't seeing the speeds they expect to be seeing.
Yeah it's a brilliant touch. Currently the only method is to use an OBD2 dongle to read battery temp, volts and amps, etc, and try and guess.
@@chunkychuck Yeah, and even then, you'd need to know the parameters. Hopefully, it also reduces confusion for people who plug into 50 kW chargers and wonder why they aren't seeing advertised charging speeds.
Yeah while your hopping around getting to know all the chargers in your town maybe you will run into some of the other suckers that got electric toys and you can chat it up about how much money you are gonna save after you spent 100k to have the honor to wait at charging station for three hours to save 20$
@@michaelbassett5105 You don't seem to know anything about EVs. Public chargers are for convenience and road trips, not cost savings. My Chevy Bolt EV costs me 2 cents per mile to charge at home. Why would I go out of my way to spend 8 cents per mile on a public charger?
And in the case of the HUMMER EV, do you really think that stopping for 30 minutes for every 7 hours of driving is a huge sacrifice? Most people will stop for at least 30 minutes over the course of a 500-mile drive. 🙄
@@newscoulomb3705 same here I to charge my electric toys at home.
Actually it takes 24 hours to fully charge in "fast charge", 4 days at home.
Very interesting. Good video. We just did a 1500 mile trip in a Tesla model 3 and observed max charge rates when we started with a battery down at 20% or below. Overall, surprisingly easy and convenient to travel with fast charging.
What is the cost of charging at home and at a charging station.
@@jasonbowman7190 on our trip, the typical supercharger stop was 20 to 25 minutes and cost around $11 - $12. I don’t have home charge costs calculated, but it is quite a bit lower than supercharging. This car gets a lot of free charging while at work (which offers that service). Either way, much lower cost than a comparable fuel purchase.
@@jasonbowman7190 I charge at home mostly. It is $0.05/kwhr in the summer off peak and $0.03 off peak in the winter. On average 1000 miles is roughly $12. Way cheaper than using a charging station. Model Y performance. I average about 4 miles per kwhr
The GM Ultium platform seems incredibly promising. Can’t wait to see it on more affordable cars like the Equinox
What is promising about it? Its only remarkable capability is to charge at 1000v, yet that likely won’t be possible on vehicles with smaller packs such as equinox.
this...is horrible performance. a 18" thick 200kwh battery pack is taking less power than a 40,000$ model 3 80kwh pack from 2018. unless this is sarcasm lol
@@richardroberson9277 this video wasn't done under normal conditions so of course charging was slower. But Ultium can charge up to 350 kW beating Tesla since their proprietary connector can't handle that high power without overheating
If that ever come to production
You will have to wait
This EV movement is fun to watch and very fascinating. Hopefully within 2-3 generations they have faster charging and more importantly range. Real world range is just where I want it to be to feel confident and comfortable.
@@alanj7306 You're right. Most EVs aren't ideal cross-country road-trippers yet. When you're charging at theses stations, you're paying extra for the convenience and to fund construction of more chargers. Give it 5 or 10 years for the improved infrastructure and next-generation vehicles to really be more accepted by the general public.
i think model s plaids are already charging at over 1000 miles per hour.
@@richardroberson9277, Tesla is in an entirely different class compared to nearly every other EV in multiple areas. Charging is probably the most obvious of those differences. Even the Model 3 LR can charge at a higher rate than this, despite having a battery 1/3rd the size. The Model 3 LR can also charge at several hundred miles per hour of charging so it's not just the top of the line Teslas. It's all modern Teslas.
I don't know what GM was thinking taking their most inefficient vehicle of all time and deciding to make one of their first EVs out of it. It earned a reputation for being a vehicle for people that are proud to waste money. It only had a few good years of sales at a time when gas was super cheap and the brand died quickly (and was viewed by many as a sign of stupidity) when gas prices went to $4 per gallon in ~2007. This, and large super duty trucks used for towing, are the worst case scenario for EVs. I think GM is going to sell very few of these. Really bad product choice that was probably made by some MBA, bean counter, or marketing schmuck that was given a leadership position.
Agree although I think it’s a bit of a gimmick. They’re over pricing these vehicles like crazy you spend 110000 msrp and if you look online they’re going for 188000 to save money on gas? Haha we fall for anything
78 miles added. Real world usable amount is probably closer to 70. At $14.25/70 miles=$0.203/mile. For comparison, my ‘17 Escalade ESV does 20mpg hand calculated, at $4.50/gallon=$0.225/mile. Over a year of driving 8000 miles for me equals a savings of $176/year. Charging at home would cost about ~1/4 of the $0.31 the DC fast charge cost, at $0.08/Kwh, for a savings of $1381/year or $115/month.
Even when you save $1381 per year it would take at least 10 years to recover the extra cost of EV... if the government really wanted to care about climate change, they would grant more money incentives than what they offer now in rebates to make the vehicle cost the same as its ICE counter part... Thanks for doing the math on this.. no one ever seems to compare charging cost to gas cost much.
@@MATTYSRT8 just don't buy the blinged out evs then
@@MATTYSRT8 Government incentives aren't free money! We don't need more incentives, unless you enjoy more inflation.
Matt and JH doesn’t really know what they’re comparing this truck to. The closest gas truck that we can compare it to is a Ram TRX which is over $100k with all the crazy markups currently at the dealerships. Also your 2017 Escalade getting 20mpg is BS.
@@2amchef16 And the Hummer EV is over $100,000 before markups. What will it cost when the dealers stick that on? It's just easier to focus on MSRP.
The cost is getting insane...it is the same cost per mile as my Ford Raptor at $4/gallon of gas...home charging in my area cuts that down tremendously but it is pretty ridiculous.
350 kW will probably only happen if your charge
Also, most EA charging stations are limited to 350 amp service (at least now). So approx. 350 A * 800 Volt = maximum 280 kW.
@@TFLtruck True EA uses different vendors their ABB units are often limited to 350A. EVgo has some 500A units that might be good. Finding the GM "Ultium" sponsored sites will likely be able to max out the charge rate.
2:00 Oh, come on, GM! The flap on the Chevrolet Bolt EV's CCS port was by far the best DC pin covering option. This plug cap looks ridiculously difficult to work with.
Gotta be smarter than the cap.
@@WheresHerb Ease of use has nothing to do with being smart. Andre knows how to use a basic plug cap, but that doesn't make it any easier with a phone in one hand and a CCS plug in the other.
ha. why not just reuse the part even. this one is identical with a stupid little led on top lol
@@richardroberson9277 Identical to what? This is definitely not the same 150 A CCS socket that is used in the Bolt EV. This one looks like a beefed up Phoenix Contact CCS socket, rated for a continuous 500 A DC and 80 A AC.
$15 for 78 miles? I’ll pass on that.
The main problem here is that you are starting the charge at a way too high SOC.
Yeah, that's why at the end he said he wants to do a 10%-80% once they can get one outside of the press event.
@@chunkychuck but he doesn't connect that sentence to why he didn't reach the claimed max charge rate...
50% isn't really that high. The battery in this vehicle is enormous. It's 3 times the size of a Model 3 Long Range battery (~212kWh vs ~72kWh). The Model 3 LR can charge at over 100kW all the way up to 70%. With a 3x larger battery pack, the Hummer EV should be able to do 300kW+ all the way up to 70%, but instead it's struggling to break 200kW at 50%. It's not clear if the bottleneck is the vehicle or the charger, but either way this will be the consumer's experience. I don't expect them to match Tesla, but this doesn't even look close. I guess we'll find out more if they do a more thorough test starting with a lower SOC and different chargers, but it's not looking great in this limited test.
The energy cost using that charging station at 31¢/kWh is not much less than the cost of gas. I'm an EV fan, but, there's a reason for the slow adoption rate. The cost differential of a new EV far exceeds the energy savings.
I filled my tank with diesel in under 3 mins, I'm good for 400 miles.
Bonus, i feed the plants and trees along the way 😎
I just fueled up my SUV and I'm back on the road by the time you got your phone app connected.
Curious... How much weight will it tow?
Hummer 78 miles = $14
Lincoln SUV 20 miles per gallon needs 4 gallons = $20
Time spend 3 minutes.
Lincoln is still better
yes ICE
are better
This makes me super excited for the Silverado EV.
350,000 watts per hour 350kw. That's a shit load of electricity. It's going to add more to your electric bill then it would with filling up gasoline. Once you past 2 or 3 tier electric rates then double and triple in price per Kw.
Wow 45.9 kW filled an 82 mile gap in charge. Even with the Hummer EV using some of power to condition or cool the battery during charging, that puts it well under the 2 mile/kWh line. Slurping electrons!!
Thank you for the first look, Andre. Good to see the real deal and what its like!
With weight and aero like this, I'm not surprised. Even the BMW i4 has a hard time getting to 3 miles per kwh at speed, and it's an ICE converted sport sedan.
The most comparable EV currently out there would probably be the Rivian.
Based on my EV experience, I'd expect this vehicle to use 500 to 700 wh/mi at 70-75MPH.
thats also supplied power and not stored power. 3% loss so somewhere around 600wh/mile vs a model x towing a 2 horse trailer getting 900wh/mile lol
Lowkey 14.25 for 75 miles is almost the same as my Acura gets with the high gas prices and taking premium gas. Full supporter of electric vehicles but I was surprised at the price to charge this one.
Also as the EVs increase over time, demand on the system will increase so will the elctricity rates for EV charging.
This is the least efficient electric vehicle. It’s MPG rating is like 45 MPGe. It’s a horrible product from GM. Probably cause more environmental harm than your Acura that gets 25-30 MPG
Too many videos focus on the cost of public charging as if that’s what you’d usually do. Inadvertently spreading EV FUD. Most charging is done at home where the cost is much, much lower (like 2 cents per mile for a normal sized vehicle).
@@-Jethro- I’ve driven a Tesla and to charge it didn’t cost nearly as much and teslas charging stations are far easier than electrify America
@@martinmcandrew1377 Yep, I did a 1500 mile road trip in our model Y. Tesla’s superchargers were awesome. We hit 249kw several times.
But the point I was making is that most EV owners charge overnight at home most of the time. The cost of public charging does not represent the normal daily charging cost. I worry that the EV curious will see videos like this one and say “well that’s no better than gas”
Interesting video with a focus on the speed but what about the expense? $14 for 78 miles of range? At $4/gallon and 20mpg you'd have only spent $16 for basically the same range, and would have been in and out in 5 minutes with a full tank. Personally I value my time at more than $2/hr. And of course this is before the government achieves critical electric vehicle mass and starts levying comparable taxes on electricity as they do for gas (California is already partially doing this). At which point you'll have price parity or worse. And let's not forget the cost of entry here at over $100k. I don't get it.
When was the last time you took a road trip much more than 300 miles one way? Personally I think it was in… 2016? And that’s despite having road tripped to Yellowstone, Moab, etc in the meantime. Remember home charge is dirt cheap.
@@bob15479 That argument only holds water for affluent people with freestanding homes. That is not relevant to mass EV adoption. How many people own their home and can spend $100k+ on an EV. Most people rent, typically apartments, and won't have a nice garage to park and plug in. They live in cities and this is exactly where they'll be charging.
78 Miles in 12 mins is pretty impressive. Let’s compare it to its closest gas truck competitor the RAM TRX, which avg 11mpg (if you’re babying it). At 78 miles that’s about 7 gallons of gas in the TRX. National “premium” gas prices is around $5. So let’s take 7 gallons x $5 would be $35 for the TRX compared to $14.25 for Hummer Ev.
$0.31 is pretty expensive compared to home charging which avg $0.10-$0.20 per kwh if you’re on the grid. People who are off grid with solar $0. Also, some charging stations offer 1-3 hours free charging at 6 kwh which isn’t fast but better than having to pay.
Make sure and drive those 78 miles quick. Let it sit around and miles will just disappear...
By the time it's fully charged, the TRX would be at the destination. Your time is worth something too.
@@michaelbassett5105
Vampire drain? Not really an issue. Just left our EV unplugged for 5 days and didn't see any loss at the airport. Nor has it been an issue with any EV we've owned.
.... Let it sit for a month or two and the story may be different.
And when you figure in the additional cost to purchase, it will cost more to operate than a gas vehicle. Not to mention that the electricity is most likely being generated by coal or natural gas. Now add the additional pollution to make the lithium batteries, they are not eco friendly
@@sptrader6316 I think that was partly the point. You’re going to spend LOTS of *time* refilling at the gas stations if you own a TRX. So I agree, your time _is_ worth something. Your *money* is worth something too and you’re spending more money at the pump in a TRX. Your purchased *experience* is worth something too. Time it takes to refuel/recharge shouldn’t be the only measurement for convenience.
Dayum. GM hiring video game designers to do their software was a smart move. Those menus and graphical interfaces make the screens in the Mach-E, Model Y, and Polestar 2 look like 1980s Atari.
1980’s Atari 🎮😭
guys, as an ev channel, this is an incredibly bad take. 350A EA station, starting at 50%, etc etc.
This is at a GM first drive event. Andre did the best he could with the time allowed to him. To get the charge down below 20% would've taken another hundred-something miles and almost two hours of additional time he likely didn't have at the event.
@@jakelee5456 incorrect. either he doesnt understand charging rates and EVs (bad since this is their EV channel), or he knew he wouldnt see max speed given 50% and amp limit but played dumb (still bad as this is just stoking the why ev no work side)....
@@laloajuria4678 Must try harder to control all variables to make EVs look as good as possible, got it.
Just an absolutely excellent informative video.
Please do a few more charging videos.
We will do more when we get the vehicle for a longer period of time.
Wait till those government taxes/fees/electricity price increases kick in. So at $14 you got about a 100 miles. That's roughly 3.25 gallons of gas where I live, my vehicle gets 30 mpg . 3.25x30= 98.5 miles. Savings?
What about the much higher initial cost for the EV. I don't see much savings + you have to deal with "range anxiety" trying to find the "right" charger, especially if you're on a trip. Then there's the time wasted charging. The tech isn't there yet for me.
@sptrader same here. I live in very rural area and unless I spend $2-3,000 to upgrade and install a charger unit at home a EV just isn't practical for me.
Loving this new channel. Keep up the good work Andre, and everyone at TFL.
Thank you for watching!
175-180 kW at 50% is quite good speed actually. Not many EVs would be able to do that (as seen in Mr.Bjorn Nyland's Channel)
That's because the Hummer's battery is about 3 times larger than most at about 200kw in size.
O.K.. So, now perform a recharge from 5% to 100% and let us know how many minutes it takes. LOL 😂😂😂😂😂
$15.00 for a 20 min charge to go 80 miles????
😢
I love how people are skipping over the fact that they are paying MORE then gas now. I can't believe how many people really believed that charging would never be as expensive as gas.
Huh? I am on my 2nd EV, and ordered a EV Truck. I charge 95% at home, my electricity hasn't gone up at all in the 4 years I've had an electric car. It costs me ~2.14USD to drive 72 miles (round trip commute). How is that more than gas? Fast charging at a Supercharger isn't as cheap, but it's at least half the cost of gas, on the conservative side. What am I missing???
@@Cjdergrosse you just said it, you charge at home. There are literally 1000s of EV and Tesla owners that don't charge their cars at home. They look at that $14 bill and think there paying half but don't put 2 and 2 together that they only got 80 miles for that money.
My hybrid gets over 100 miles for that same amount of money.
Thanks for sharing - answered a number of questions about charging.
Thank you for watching.
Did some quick calculations - the recharge will cost you about $0.19/mile. My 2010 costs me about $0.24/mile at $4 gas here in Iowa. And I can fill up my tank in under 8 minutes when close to empty.
I noticed in one of the videos that they guys were having an issue with the folding mirrors. I have noticed on my Hummer ED1 that my mirrors only auto fold when I lock the truck from either the remote or by pushing the lock button on the door handle. Hope this helps if they are still trying to figure this out.
I would like to see a gas powered Silverado and a EV Silverado drive across the country leaving the same starting, the same route, and same finish point! LA to NY. Interesting to see what the time taken for said trip, the cost to refuel and recharge, and overall performance.
Its great you can use chargers at the places you are visiting for more than couple hrs or so. But if you going to make a quick pit stop to charge for a few miles to you destination, thats the question I would like to know. Gas its like 5-7 mins fill and you're off. Don't worry about filling up until the tank is 1/4 tank or close to empty. I would rather get a Hummer Hybrid with a V8.
4 days to charge LOL!
Good to know that the charging speed from over 50% state of charge is decent for the Ultium platform. This should be the same battery as in the Chevy Silverado EV I ordered, but the Chev is a bit more efficient.
New to this
I don't see these charging stations everywhere so can you just charge at home?
What do you do in a camping situation?
I have seen ENOUGH videos to KNOW max charging speed is a unicorn 🦄 event
So over $14 for a whopping 78 miles of range!?! All in 18 minutes. I can fill up my Hyundai Sonata Hybrid in about 4 minutes, pay about $40 and get over 500 miles of range. So that Hummer is actually less efficient and more expensive to fill up than my Hybrid. Not impressed.
At the end of the day, you're still comparing an aerodynamic, relatively small car to a 9,000 lb tank. No one said this thing was going to be cheap or efficient
Hummers have never been and never will be efficient. Their entire purpose is to be monstrosities of over consumption.
why....would you expect it to NOT be? wut? its 9500lbs dude.
If a 9500lb un-aerodynamic truck is more efficient than your hybrid, something is wrong. It would cost about $20 to drive my 5800lb truck 78 miles.
If it was summertime and 100° outside, and you just pulled off the highway, how would that affect the charge rate ?
Dramatically slow it down. Think of your cell phone battery when it's hot. However these batteries are temperature controlled so it's not as if it wouldn't charge at all. I would assume it would charge at roughly 50% rated speed
Can you charge when it's thunder an lightning out. Is it safe to hook up the charger cord in thunder storms. Because we've always been taught water an electric don't mix.
Gasoline and diesel can’t mix with water either. Do you add gasoline in the rain?
Good question Arnie
Ehh I’ll just wait another 4 years for the cybertruck release
And in that time I could have filled up my pickup, grabbed something from inside, and been down the road
I'm not against EV but time is very valuable.
and continued us down the climate change path.
VERY Suspicious that you have to 'calculate' what it cost for charging... 🤔
Also: $14.25/78 mi = $0.18 per mile. Not great. (Ya Ya I Know, "But it's better when you charge overnight at home")
Your videos have convinced me to go look at the hummer over a Cybertruck. The charging was my biggest issue. The US has to do better for other vehicles. Tesla owns the market in this and I’d like to be fully electric but not fully Tesla. I love my X but mainly for the FSD. This charging system is great tho.
The fact the Hummer charged from only half charged to 75% in less than 20 mins is actually pretty impressive since these are usually the *slowest* examples of fast charging rates.
It's not that impressive. The fastest charging speeds are in the middle of the pack.
this pos is going to need all of its range to even have a dream of towing something up to 7000 with its 9500lb weight lol
@@richardroberson9277 Lmdao. Yeah, I wonder what the Ford Lightning’s range is while towing something 7,000 lbs. It doesn’t weigh anywhere near 9,000 lbs either. 😂
It's impressive because the battery is huge on these trucks
Peak charge rate is usually between 25-40% SOC. During 55-75% charge, you are probably not getting the max charging rate. Above 75%, charge rate drops quite fast, and above 90%, it's usually a waste of time charging.
From zero to 30 percent it can charge at 350kW. Then 30 to 40 percent is about 250kW. Then after that it settles in around 170kW. I think the throttling factor is the thermal management of the battery system.
I heard many of Electrify America's 350kW chargers can't charge at that rate. They need an updated module to get to that true 350kW speed. EA is working on replacing those on their chargers.
Then they should take the sticker off of the unit until the modifications can be made
Is it possible to view charging speed in kW? Is there a setting for that?
miles/300*200kwh*1.03 due to efficiency losses then again might already be counting.
I saw a white Hummer (same truck) parked in front of the Mountain Shadows resort in Paradise Valley AZ earlier today.
Pretty impressive beast…
More proof that will push me to buy gas powered with my next purchase.
Since some people will be saying that's expensive, you're correct; Electrify America makes money from these sessions, unlike Tesla. Thats why.
I just calculated the cost for me to go 78 miles in my Volkswagen Jetta Tdi Sportwagen on bio-diesel that I made myself from used vegetable oil was free.
My Ford Eco boost gets 31mpg, which only costs my $7.95 do drive the same 78 miles you just paid $14.20 for. Gas here in Denver is $3.18.
So $14 to go from ~53% to 75%. That makes a “fill up” from 0 to100% cost over $60…
Chargers are often 1000volt at 350 amp aka theoretically 350 kW. But since it is 0nly pulling 800 volts and even that gets throttled down to 80% you would see around 225 to 280 kW top speed. Also top speed is seen around 10% and then drops 55% battery capacity at 178 kW is very good. I just spent 1 hour 15 minutes adding 25 kW to my Chevy Bolt EV. Man what i would do to do it in 8 minutes.... :)
Max charging rate will be with a depleted battery that is pre heated for charging. So 53% charges battery isn’t close to 0%. So your results are not bad.
This might be the first car review I’ve seen with a successful session of charging from an EA station. Albeit slow. Public charging other than Tesla is a joke.
I charge at EA all the time with my Ioniq5 its very fast I reach 240kw on the 350s and 178kw on the 150s 10%-80% in 17 minutes exactly what Hyundai claims I got several times. I wouldn't call this successful it was slow.
I have no issues charging at all. Do you even ev bro?
“Sorry work, you’re gonna have to give me 40 mins to charge my vehicle before I can make it in”
charge the night before or leave it plugged in at home overnight
The cost to charge was more then I thought it would be. But calculate in maintenance cost running ice vs ev and the ev will be ahead. They have a long way to go on the charging network and battery chemistry before I go for one.
but factor in the cost of replacing the battery and then you're better off with ice
I got 2 things out of this - the Hummer EV has battery preconditioning (this is good!) and it functions on Electrify America (I’d hope so, but sometimes new models have issues). $0.31/kWh is totally acceptable for DCFC. This is a joke of a charging test starting at 50+%. Do better, TFL.
Don’t forget to figure in the cost of your time to hang out with the charger 🔌
Time is money...
Most of the time you're not hanging out with the charger, you're shopping or doing stuff you need to do.
I was told by Ryan Shaw tech the hummer EV has dumb range and should take longer to charge due to using a bigger batter to get more range rather than making the EV more efficient so you can get more range with a smaller battery (keeping in mind this is a truck so won't have the best coeffecicint of drag). Looks like it can charge pretty fast. But a bigger battery would also cost more to charge all the way.
$14.24 doesn’t seem very cheap to travel only 75 miles
Hummers in general were never very cheap to travel 75 miles, but still cheaper than mine. My Escalade gets 9mpg on an average day which means traveling 75 miles uses about 8 gallons. If I fill up using regular 87 gas at $3.71 a gallon (I just filled up today 1/27/2023) that would cost me about $30 in my Escalade. The BEST mpg I've gotten on a tank is 12mpg which would mean traveling 75 miles = 6.25 gallons = $23... This bougie Hummer EV is still cheaper than my truck lol.
I'm driving from NC to south FL, my 2020 F-150 get there in 8.5 hours. Hummer EV, 3 days...... yeah no
Will the grid handle ALL cars being EV? Elon Musk has said that the entire US electrical power requirement could be supplied by one 300x300 mile area of solar panels. I thought "whaaat, no way" so I did the math and it is very conservatively true. Home charging currently is about one third of the charge cost in this video. I believe that it is not emphasized enough that home charging will be the vast majority of all electrical vehicle charging, not roadside charging (I also believe that the convenience of home charging will easily counterbalance the inconvenience of much less frequent roadside charging (not for trucking though, hmm)). Lucky enough, home charging almost always takes place overnight when the grid is not highly used. I haven't but someone should do the math of how much electrical power it would take for all electrical power consumption, including the charging of ALL vehicles being electric, overnight versus the typical overall daytime consumption. The rough math is not actually too hard to do. The current grid at current max use likely has a relatively small buffer to overload. If the calculated overnight factor (including all EVs charging) exceeds the current daytime max then the grid has to be upgraded. I haven't done the math, the factor could be even or it could be 5 or 20 times. If the grid has to be upgraded then you can bet the cost of at home charging will rapidly be increased to likely even more than the current fuel costs. I highly suspect that reduced cost to the consumer will NOT ultimately be a benefit for EV conversion but more likely will be justification by the powers that be to increase the "fuel" cost of vehicle travel! Someone has to do that math.
The one figure I saw was around ~30% adoption rate before electrical grids will need significant upsizing. I think that 30% will take a while even as popular as EV's are right now. What is it now like 1-2% only in the US? The same argument was made back when central AC was getting popular. All these homes built in the 50s-70s with only 60A electrical service couldn't handle central AC without compromise. Everything back to the utility needed to be slowly upgraded as AC got more and more popular. Same will need to happen with EVs.
I've noticed that when new major powerlines are being built, they are usually only 1/2 or 1/3 populated. I assume that's on purpose so if demand keeps increasing they can just add more transmission wires.
And maybe a good solution is for utility companies to offer significant discounts on rates and charging equipment if you only install 30A of charging or less. Which should be fine for most, and would probably stretch out the time needed to upgrade utilities by a large margin. Maybe that could support 50% EV adoption if the majority only had 30A charge circuits.
24A is all I charge my Model 3 at, and my daily commute is 120mi. That recharges in 6-7hrs overnight depending on how cold it is.
However, if vehicles like this Hummer or other full size electric trucks with 150kWh+ packs get popular and households get more than one large EV, a single 30A circuit isn't going to be enough. But a household with 2 standard sized cars could, especially if both vehicles only travel ~50mi a day.
@@andrewt9204 I took a closer look at reports and there is a full range of expectations. Most are positive and say only typical upgrades necessary but others say otherwise. I don't think I heard of the possibility of rolling blackouts in North America, due to electrical supply, until the last couple of years (without EVs). The grid has to support the absolute worst case at all times, especially if transportation is included. If there is already problems occurring then all vehicles as EVs seems like it will make matters much worse. Some say EVs will improve the grid by acting as available stored power for those problem points but I really don't think people will take too kindly to only a 75% charge in their cars because it's a hot day when they expect 100% (when they need the charge most themselves). It will be interesting......
Something about monthly subscriptions don’t sit well with me when it come town owning a car and driving. Can I be blocked out of charging my car?
so if your getting 20mpg it's about the same cost to fill
Basically $1 per minute or $1 euro per minute
Pretty cool video thanks for sharing the more practical day in the life stuff that actually matters
$1 euro?
Come to Pennsylvania or any of the northern states and do that. Most of the country has 4 distinct seasons so being able to see how fast it can charge in cold weather would be a great test.
Where's tommy? He's the ev guy. He can tell of experiences charging far better than Andre.
Don’t hate on my boy Andre
I'd love to adopt this new technology and my home electricity cost is only about $0.11/Kwh on average and as low as $0.08, but since my truck is paid off none of that matters. I can't afford a $115K truck. I wonder if the dealers will be marking them up even higher and our of reach for most folks?
Station is fully capable of 350kW; the battery is not. In fact, NO battery on the market is capable of consistant 350kW charging from 0% to 100%. You did charge at a higher percentage so if you were at say 20% you may see those speeds but only momentarily. The only car that can get remotely close to those speeds for an extended period is the Lucid Air and even then with a 900V battery gets around 300-310kW.
With the Arizona heat are electric Cars life span cut down ? Anyone know ?
I want to see the cost when charging from 50 percent to 100%. I know most lithium batteries take way more energy to get the final 25 %.
thats not how that works. they take time not energy. whoever told you that ask them to pay for your lunch then dont pay them back
just like most EVs. Full charging speed is only available when the battery is at a lower stated capacity, at the begining of charging session. In ideal weather conditions.
If it becomes normal to charge EVs at 350 kW or more, I wonder how that will effect (no pun intended) the grid. Is it in needs of upgrades? Maybe not now, but if we say 1/3 of the vehicles on the road is electric 20 years from now, are we making the necessary preparations? 🧐
A popular option for new stations is to have a large battery pack that shaves off the peak demands so that there is less strain on the grid.
But yes, udating the grid is definitely something we need to keep in mind.
@@prerunnerwannabe Which is a terrible idea. Batteries have little scalability, so charging will cost you more. At $14.25/78 miles, it's already expensive.
@@AkioWasRight it's really the wild west out there for costs at charging stations. Where I live EA charges 57c a min for 350kw, while a competitor charges 27c for the same speed.
@@AkioWasRight That's not the whole picture. If the grid connection has to be upgraded to handle the power of a fast charging station, that costs an absolutely massive amount of money and time. Additionally, every month any fast charging station has to pay a peak demand charge which is often $20 per kW. Meaning that if at one point during the month the station pulls 1000 kW of power, they will have to pay the utility company $20,000 dollars on top of the normal electricity cost.
@@AkioWasRight it's a bad example because the Hummer is pretty inefficient -- most EVs would have gotten more than 78miles in that time and/or it wouldn't have cost $14.28 for 78 miles. $.31kw --- so $14.25 is about 46kwh -- more than half of most EVs battery capacity.
It seems like putting charge ports on both sides of a vehicle would be quite simple compared to putting a fuel filler on both sides.
So, for putting things in perspective, he added 45.95 kW into the battery in 18 minutes, which means it charged in average at a speed of 153 kW starting from 53% SOC to 75% SOC. This charging speed is way above what a Tesla can do at the same SOC. Tesla is around 80 kW average charging speed from 53% to 75%. So the Hammer charges two times faster than the Tesla M3. If the Hammer was a lower SOC (state of charge), I am sure the average speed would have been above 200 kW, which in 18 mins would add 60 kWh in the battery. For a total of 18$ for about 100 miles. A truck of same size as the Hammer would be rated at 15-20 mpg. That's 5 x 5.084 $ (Diesel) = 25 $.
I wonder how many charging stations they had to stop at before they found one that worked...
Honey I’m going to get the hummer charged up I’ll be back before supper.
@@michaelbassett5105 there I just plugged the hummer into the largest Level 2 charger on the market 80 amps. It will be done in 12 hours. neat.
The new Desten batteries I believe charge 80% or higher in 5 minutes. The Desten batteries sound like a game changer.
could have filled up 20 gas powered cars in this time, these ev's are a joke!
Haul something . Tell me what the rate is then
Diesel generator
I like how when it’s a Legacy auto manufacturer that’s failing to meet expectations they are always on a positive note on TFL. If this was a Tesla failing to reach charging capacity or even remotely close to it they would’ve thrown Tesla under the bus.
This is also another consideration of super heavy EV‘s is charge times will be near double because consumption is near doubled. Small EV‘s will charge faster than large EV’s from the owners perspective.
Very true. It's not just this channel though. It seems almost everyone wants to give the benefit of the doubt to legacy auto even though it's obvious they are failing to produce compelling (or sometimes even mediocre) EVs. Meanwhile, they'll nitpick everything about a Tesla and hold it to a completely different standard. That would be fine if they acknowledged that Tesla sets the standard and they expect more from it. However, it's presented more like, "Tesla earns a B- grade because it doesn't have a plastic divider in this storage compartment to hold my lunchbox. GM gets an A because they managed to make it charge slowly."