Great interview! I’m glad to see more scholarship on de Lubac. I have an article coming out very soon in the Fall edition of Evangelization & Culture (WOF Journal) on de Lubac’s life and work.
This was so refreshing . Makes me excited to learn about a great mind of the Church in my lifetime and his explaining the complexities that have shaped this current time . Thank you.
Wow another Hulse! I was researching De Lubac having just gotten his book “The Splendor of the Church” and found both an interesting podcast and a knowledgeable and engaging namesake (there’s not many Hulses!).
Excellent talk. I hear this garbage of de Lubac being a heretic from the RAD trads and this fascinating lady (as well as DeClue) does a marvelous job to debunk that. Too bad she’s already married😅
This conversation is entirely about Christ and what He revealed to mankind. They are just "zoomed way way in" - plumbing the details and nuance of Christian theology. Conversations like this only happen (and these two hosts only have interest in these subjects) due to their love for Christ.
@@SearchingTheArchives love of apologetics and Greek Neoplatonism and aristolean syllogisms. Augustine of hippo and others we're influenced by Greek influences of Plotinus also. People dont check out deep enough to find the root cause their reasonings.
Platonism was gutted and remade top to bottom by the church fathers in the post-NT period. The emanation theme, for one. Nyssen, Dionysius, Maximus approached Greek philosophy with a sovereign freedom you won’t find in the sola scriptura crowd. That crowd occupies a “tradition” too, because the notion of unmediated access to scripture was itself historically mediated. So they need to explain why their moment is privileged, and why the Spirit vanished for centuries from the corporate and intellectual life of the church. But you will have a hard time doing this, because you know nothing about that history. Your tradition told you to ignore it. You haven’t read the church fathers. Who is easy prey, then, to philosophical trends? You are.
Great interview! I’m glad to see more scholarship on de Lubac. I have an article coming out very soon in the Fall edition of Evangelization & Culture (WOF Journal) on de Lubac’s life and work.
I greatly appreciate your work that you’ve put into the WOF institute. Keep it up!
This was so refreshing . Makes me excited to learn about a great mind of the Church in my lifetime and his explaining the complexities that have shaped this current time . Thank you.
Wow another Hulse! I was researching De Lubac having just gotten his book “The Splendor of the Church” and found both an interesting podcast and a knowledgeable and engaging namesake (there’s not many Hulses!).
Great guest! Very insightful conversation!
Thank you!
I really enjoyed her explanation. So joyful 😀.
52:00 It's also blown my mind, thanks 🙏
This was a well done introduction into the thought of a deep thinker. Good guest...does need that standard bookshelf though...
Thank you 😊
Excellent talk. I hear this garbage of de Lubac being a heretic from the RAD trads and this fascinating lady (as well as DeClue) does a marvelous job to debunk that. Too bad she’s already married😅
Very well done Sara!
Great minds oblivious to this present world. They go back to their own history and ignore other historical scholar's.
Nothing about christ just their own saints and theologians.
This conversation is entirely about Christ and what He revealed to mankind. They are just "zoomed way way in" - plumbing the details and nuance of Christian theology. Conversations like this only happen (and these two hosts only have interest in these subjects) due to their love for Christ.
@@SearchingTheArchives love of apologetics and Greek Neoplatonism and aristolean syllogisms. Augustine of hippo and others we're influenced by Greek influences of Plotinus also. People dont check out deep enough to find the root cause their reasonings.
Platonism was gutted and remade top to bottom by the church fathers in the post-NT period. The emanation theme, for one. Nyssen, Dionysius, Maximus approached Greek philosophy with a sovereign freedom you won’t find in the sola scriptura crowd. That crowd occupies a “tradition” too, because the notion of unmediated access to scripture was itself historically mediated. So they need to explain why their moment is privileged, and why the Spirit vanished for centuries from the corporate and intellectual life of the church. But you will have a hard time doing this, because you know nothing about that history. Your tradition told you to ignore it. You haven’t read the church fathers. Who is easy prey, then, to philosophical trends? You are.