Prof. Jeffrey Sachs ANALYZES How the Western Leaders ENDANGER Their Nations by Refusing to Negotiate
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 4 ต.ค. 2024
- Please remember to like, subscribe, and click the notification bell to stay up to date on all of our new videos.
In this video Prof. Jeffrey Sachs, the renowned economist and public policy analyst, discusses President Putin's peace proposal for Ukraine. Topics include an immediate ceasefire, Ukraine's neutrality, and Crimea's status. He emphasizes the need for negotiations and critiques the US and Europe's dismissive response, highlighting the historical context of NATO's expansion and the importance of pragmatic diplomacy.
Dans cette vidéo, le professeur Jeffrey Sachs discute de la proposition de paix du président Poutine pour l'Ukraine. Les sujets incluent un cessez-le-feu immédiat, la neutralité de l'Ukraine et le statut de la Crimée. Il souligne la nécessité de négociations et critique la réponse dédaigneuse des États-Unis et de l'Europe, mettant en lumière le contexte historique de l'expansion de l'OTAN et l'importance d'une diplomatie pragmatique.
در این ویدیو، پروفسور جفری ساکس درباره پیشنهاد صلح رئیسجمهور پوتین برای اوکراین صحبت میکند. موضوعات شامل آتشبس فوری، بیطرفی اوکراین و وضعیت کریمه است. او بر لزوم مذاکرات تأکید میکند و پاسخ تحقیرآمیز ایالات متحده و اروپا را نقد میکند، و به زمینه تاریخی گسترش ناتو و اهمیت دیپلماسی عملگرایانه اشاره میکند.
في هذا الفيديو، يناقش البروفيسور جيفري ساكس اقتراح السلام الذي قدمه الرئيس بوتين لأوكرانيا. تشمل الموضوعات وقف إطلاق النار الفوري، حياد أوكرانيا، ووضع القرم. يؤكد على الحاجة إلى المفاوضات وينتقد الرد المتجاهل من الولايات المتحدة وأوروبا، مسلطًا الضوء على السياق التاريخي لتوسع الناتو وأهمية الدبلوماسية العملية.
En este video, el profesor Jeffrey Sachs discute la propuesta de paz del presidente Putin para Ucrania. Los temas incluyen un alto el fuego inmediato, la neutralidad de Ucrania y el estatus de Crimea. Él enfatiza la necesidad de negociaciones y critica la respuesta despectiva de EE.UU. y Europa, y destacando el contexto histórico de la expansión de la OTAN.
Neste vídeo, o professor Jeffrey Sachs discute a proposta de paz do presidente Putin para a Ucrânia. Os tópicos incluem um cessar-fogo imediato, a neutralidade da Ucrânia e o status da Crimeia. Ele enfatiza a necessidade de negociações e critica a resposta desdenhosa dos EUA e da Europa, destacando o contexto histórico da expansão da OTAN e a importância de uma diplomacia pragmática.
اس ویڈیو میں، پروفیسر جیفری ساکس صدر پوتن کی یوکرین کے لیے امن کی تجویز پر بات کرتے ہیں۔ موضوعات میں فوری جنگ بندی، یوکرین کی غیر جانبداری، اور کریمیا کی حیثیت شامل ہیں۔ وہ مذاکرات کی ضرورت پر زور دیتے ہیں اور امریکہ اور یورپ کے رد عمل کو تنقید کا نشانہ بناتے ہیں، نیٹو کی توسیع کے تاریخی سیاق و سباق اور عملی سفارتکاری کی اہمیت کو اجاگر کرتے ہیں۔
В этом видео профессор Джеффри Сакс обсуждает мирное предложение президента Путина по Украине. Темы включают немедленное прекращение огня, нейтралитет Украины и статус Крыма. Он подчеркивает необходимость переговоров и критикует пренебрежительный ответ США и Европы, выделяя исторический контекст расширения НАТО и важность прагматичной дипломатии.
在这段视频中，杰弗里·萨克斯教授讨论了普京总统对乌克兰的和平提议。话题包括立即停火、乌克兰的中立以及克里米亚的地位。他强调了谈判的必要性，并批评了美国和欧洲轻蔑的回应，指出北约扩张的历史背景和务实外交的重要性。
In questo video, il professor Jeffrey Sachs discute della proposta di pace del presidente Putin per l'Ucraina. I temi includono un cessate il fuoco immediato, la neutralità dell'Ucraina e lo status della Crimea. Sottolinea la necessità di negoziati e critica la risposta sprezzante degli Stati Uniti e dell'Europa, evidenziando il contesto storico dell'espansione della NATO e l'importanza di una diplomazia pragmatica.
Dalam video ini, Profesor Jeffrey Sachs membahas proposal perdamaian Presiden Putin untuk Ukraina. Topik-topik termasuk gencatan senjata segera, netralitas Ukraina, dan status Krimea. Dia menekankan perlunya negosiasi dan mengkritik respons meremehkan dari AS dan Eropa, menyoroti konteks historis ekspansi NATO dan pentingnya diplomasi pragmatis.
इस वीडियो में प्रोफेसर जेफरी साक्स राष्ट्रपति पुतिन के यूक्रेन के लिए शांति प्रस्ताव पर चर्चा करते हैं। विषयों में तत्काल युद्धविराम, यूक्रेन की तटस्थता और क्रीमिया की स्थिति शामिल हैं। वे वार्ता की आवश्यकता पर जोर देते हैं और अमेरिका और यूरोप की तिरस्कारपूर्ण प्रतिक्रिया की आलोचना करते हैं, नाटो के विस्तार के ऐतिहासिक संदर्भ और व्यावहारिक कूटनीति के महत्व को उजागर करते हैं।
In diesem Video spricht Professor Jeffrey Sachs über Präsident Putins Friedensvorschlag für die Ukraine. Themen sind ein sofortiger Waffenstillstand, die Neutralität der Ukraine und der Status der Krim. Er betont die Notwendigkeit von Verhandlungen und kritisiert die abweisende Reaktion der USA und Europas, wobei er den historischen Kontext der NATO-Erweiterung und die Bedeutung pragmatischer Diplomatie hervorhebt.
Disclaimer: Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for fair use for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.
#russia #ukraine #usa #nato #putin #europe #geopolitics #politics #analysis
![Understanding Marxism: Q&A with Richard D. Wolff [June 2019]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/eU-AkeOyiOQ/mqdefault.jpg)
![The Wall Song ร้องข้ามกำแพง | EP.213 | กรีน อัษฎาพร | 3 ต.ค. 67 [1/5]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/3KrlLbCsadI/mqdefault.jpg)
Great discussion. US needs to be held responsible for ramping up the conflict in Ukraine, when it should aim to dampen it down. Long term strategic interests into the 21st century are with competing with China.
I don’t recall the USA invading Ukraine at any point.
In fact, I don’t recall American troops in Ukraine ever.
The professor never once factored in what the Ukrainians actually want
That is because it is the realist pov. The big critique of realism as a geopolitical theory is that it does not take into account the will of the smaller powers.
And what does Ukrainian people want? PEACE - that is what Zelensky promised them when elected!
Millions of Ukrainians left the country and are not ready to fight this proxy war for US interests !
Many of those who had no chance to go abroad are now hide and many are forced to the battlefield. That's no propaganda but truth as you can hear in serious Western Media reports. My Ukrainian neighbours, run away last summer from Ukraine to Vienna, tell me the same. Ukrainian government is totally dependent on USA, they have no say anymore in what's going on. Inform yourself properly and you will know that Jeffrey Sachs is totally right in what he is saying !
Искат наживеят добре,без да работят.Това искат всички,нали
He reflects what Ukrainian people want - peace and not fighting an US proxy war! Millions of Ukrainians who left the country show it, Ukrainian men who hide from prescription and who are forced to the battlefield show it ... Ukraine has a totally on US dependent puppet government which will end war when US tell them to do it !
OK - but Ukraine did the west's (Bush's) bidding in 2008 Bucharest conference and the result was Russia then pushed back against NATO expansion. So, the west now is still responsible for helping Ukraine since it set out an aggressive path. Yes - Russia was arrogant to think it could walk into Ukraine and take over, but Ukraine has to be real about having only 43 million people and no nuclear weapons, while Russia is next door with 144 million people and 5,000 nuclear weapons. Ukraine (and the west) should accept a neutral Ukraine not armed with NATO missiles, and continue the lease of Crimean ports to Russia. Promote western trade into Ukraine - sure - but arm it offensively as part of NATO? Why? So my point is that Ukraine is completely tied into the west's strange aggressive power strategy against Russia - when it doesn't look useful. The coming competition is China vs USA - that's the real tension coming.
As Putin said during his recent speech to the Russian MOFA - "This new political and economic reality now serves as the foundation for the emerging multipolar and multilateral world order, and this is an inevitable process. It reflects the cultural and civilisational diversity that is inherently part of humanity, despite all attempts at artificial unification". For Ukraine to eventually avoid total capitulation and Russian terms of surrender, it would have to achieve an almost impossible reversal on the battlefield and an equally difficult shift in international opinion.
If the Ukrainian people want to join the EU and NATO (and are accepted) why can’t they?
С буферните зони е така!😁
🎯
Thanks 👀
isn't it pravda that Ukraine Become a Pia-no
keyboard for
NATO Composer
to play :
(zel+en+sky) style Symphony of Necropolis, For:
Black Rock,💱
Black Stone,💱
Black Wt†er,💱
In White House.
Wha† a clowns.
You didn’t use UN Charter, International Law, as well as all the treaties as your foundation to form those conclusions. What are your foundation? Did you respect ruzzia way too much? We are against the Us hegemony. But if the price is all of us are invaded and “annexed” to ruzzia, and China, we would rather had US hegemony to protect us.
Вие обичате някой да ви защитава,нали.Много женствено.
Russia will not "conquer" other countries, they just did not want CIAbases in Ukraine on their borders and future US military bases on Ukrainian territory, bc of fear to lose their free access to Black Sea. It's a US proxy war ! And - as Trump rightly said- could end within some days ... That's it !
There is another way to achieve peace... Russia leave the occupied territory and return to 1991 borders
We forgot to ask you, clown...
Не става-кой ще изчезне от картата на света?Познай от три пъти.
Cold War 2.0
Sachs, incredibly, trust Putin. Luckily, he isn't in charge of anything.
And you believe in US propaganda ... luckily, you have nothing to say!
Mexico is not a valid analogy.
Разбира се,че е валидна.А и мексиканците ви мразят не по-малко от украинците -руснаците.И има защо,нали.
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Controversy_in_Russia_regarding_the_legitimacy_of_eastward_NATO_expansion