Loved working those aircraft. I was a environmental systems repairman. Air and heating. Oxygen, de--ice. All the space to work. 1965, was headed west out of McQuire AFB on a shaky. Headed for California. Don't remember total hours of flying.....But was a long flight. Had to stay below 14,000 feet altitude. No cabin pressurised spaces. Ended up at Hickam AFB to help inspect and repair the fleet of C-124s . The build up in Vietnam required lots of transports and shakies carried the big heavy loads.
That C-124 floating in Cook Inlet was my dad's. They were returning to Biggs AFB, El Paso, TX from Alaska by way of Mccord AFB in Tacoma, WA. They lost two engines and ended up ditching in Cook Inlet. All survived.
As always, your video was very interesting. I live in Galway, Ireland and have long taken an interest in this case. The canister you speak of was found not very long after the crash. The location of its discovery remains one of the remotest parts of Ireland. It is about 50 miles west of Galway City and roughly 180 miles west of Dublin. In the 1950s it would have probably taken more than 7 hours to travel fro Dublin to that location. The canister was supposedly washed up on a beach and handed to the local police. The "powers that be" were notified and the item collected from the local police station by a military attache from the US Embassy in Dublin so the Americans believed it to be important. Some sources indicate that the note found refers to the aircrafts position and the fact that it was heading North. I could understand a passenger with flight training being able to ascertain the direction of travel from cues like the Sun but fail to understand how anybody other than the cockpit crew could establish the position of the aircraft. The note allegedly alludes to a dispute/ disturbance on board. It is absolutely bizarre that nobody was found alive or dead. The occupants were fit men, of military age and with military survival training and equipment. The mystery deepens as very little wreckage or survival equipment was found. All of this points to the involvement of what is now termed an "outside actor", in this case likely the Soviet Union. The Russians "came clean" about several other matters in the aftermath of the fall of the Soviet Union. However, I think that any hope that they will share any knowledge or admit any involvement has now evaporated, given the nature of relations between Russia and the West. I have huge sympathy for the families of those involved as they never had closure and must still be wondering about the truth. I also suspect that the US Air Force knows more than it pretends to.
What baffles me the most is that it took 19! hours for the first ships to reach the site of the crash after that first plane almost immediately after the crash sotted the rafts and wreckage and sent precise coordinates back to shore. What caused that huge delay?
The USCG patrolled "Ocean Stations" through the 1970's. The patrol was supposed to insure that any transatlantic aircraft flight would be able to ditch near one of the ships and insure most were rescued... and that happened a few times. Why the Globemaster was away from the chain of rescue ships is suspicious.
@@0101-s7v And not showing exclusively C-124s. I saw a jet powered aircraft, I saw a C-133, and a couple others that were not C-124s. I didn't know about this incident but found it interesting albeit with some misidentifications.
*When the war ended, people thought that peace would bring happiness. But the scars from the past have quietly destroyed generations without anyone realizing it.*
I agree. Not just with military personnel but people like my mother and Fathers families that survived WWII in the Netherlands. They didn't talk much about it, but after my mother hit her 80s, she showed it with flashbacks she also was at times very violent when we were kids. He father was a political prisoner slave labor. Not Jewish, but he suffered alongside them. War affects the generations that come after.
Whats odd is it had 52 men aboard. Why? And then how could all 52 just dissapear. And another question...Why did it take 19 hours to reach the ditching site? I mean really? Seems like somebody was in no hurry to pick them up. Very Fishy...indeed.
When planes catch fire their very skins and structure start to burn ferociously and toxic gases can build up within a couple of minutes. Everyone passes out, then suffocates. In addition at higher altitudes the low level of oxygen completes the doom spiral. The cause of the fire might have been the wingtip combustion burners, which had other instances of catching fire and spreading to the cabin.
I too was wondering why, so close to Ireland, did it take 19 hours to get to the site. Surely there were float planes available. Submarines, ships, something.
In 2006, a book titled, “Cleared for Disaster: Ireland’s Most Horrific Air Crashes” was posthumously released after the death of author and aviation expert Michael O’Toole. In his book, O’Toole recounts an incident when a farmer named “John Faherty” in County Galway on Ireland’s west coast found a sealed metal tin washed up on the beach. Inside this tin was a note. The note read: “Globemaster alters course for no reason. We are going north. Have to be careful. We are under surveillance. Pieces of wreckage will be found but are not of G-master. A terrible drama is being enacted on this liner.”
Why 19 hours for help from the US to arrive when there were countries closer that could have helped? Did the US deter or turn down assistance from other countries? If so, then our government's insistence on keeping secret whatever was on that plane is what cost those men their lives.
Thank you for a well made tribute to such an important plane. I was fortunate to fly in one in 1971. It was flown by either AF reserves or Air National guards, can't remember which.
I worked with a guy who was in radio interception in the UK in the 50s He said years (decades) ago that the plane went down and the crew and passengers all got out, but they intercepted comms from the Soviet Union to 2 subs that were a few hours away to intercept and capture who and whatever they could. There was a mad rush to get the crew and any cargo they could before the Soviet subs could get there. He said that they intercepted the subs comms that they were on location and gathering all survivors up. This happened less than an hour before the first US rescue aircraft arrived. The US 100% knew what happened and covered it up. They did not want to let out that SEVERAL high ranking Strategic Air Command officers who knew everything about US nuclear programs and others were captured. What happened to the crew and passengers when the Soviets were done with them? He thinks the crew was probably executed after interrogation, and the rest sent to labor camps in Siberia.
That assumes a lot of competence and organisation on the side of the USSR. Applying Occam's Razor, surving for 19 hours in an ocean without adequate life boats is a matter of extreme luck.
It would be much more plausable that the USA asked other resuce crews to back off as the risk of radiation poision, when they turned up they found people dying and suffering radiation burns etc, so just chucked them in the sea
@@geroutathatWhy? There’s no documentation of a radiation accident at that time or location, and those are not easy to conceal. I think this entire thing is a fun story that definitely didn’t happen. Abducting US citizens, much less high-ranking military personnel, in international waters would be an open act of war that the Soviet Union could not afford and which the US would have screamed about in every diplomatic setting. It’s just too unlikely, and without corroborating evidence, it’s a fish story.
I don’t see what the big mystery is - 19 hours in the water, the waters around Ireland, England, and Scotland can get turbulent and holy violent very quickly, that probably happened to them and tossed them off the life rafts - especially if they were half filed with air and half sunk when the rafts were found
It is true for some parts of the Irish Sea, and Scottish coastal seas. SOme due to narrowing channels, or sudden almost channeled shallows a little further out, which can really reek havoc with even locally experienced seamen. Otherwise they are no dofferent from any northern Atlantic sea conditions. But, you are right about how the video is 'framed' in that it's trying to create a ystery where there really isn;t one just as click-bait
@@michaelturner5050 Yeah, the more logical answer is probably aliens, time slip, another dimension, whales abducted them to sell them into the horrible world of the infamous whale sex slavery ring. Couldn’t been the rough sees or the Russians, that’s just fucking stupid talk. 👍
@@michaelturner5050 yeah rough seas or the Russians is just fucking stupid talk - more logical answer is aliens, worm holes, POSSIBLY even evil whales or mermaids. Are you one of those fuckers who thinks the earth is flat?
They didn’t exactly wait. It takes boats and slower amphibious planes to get there in the first place, then they have to search the grid, since there was no GPS when this happened. The ocean is a vast, unforgiving space and planes still go missing to this day. Weather may have been an issue as well.
I flew in a C-124 just once from England to Libya in the early 60s. Old Shaky was right. Nevertheless, a few of us did manage to sleep some. Mostly we played cards using crates for tables, and constantly having to hold the cards in place to keep them from vibrating off the crate. Those old birds were quite noisy too, as they had very little insulation in the cargo hold. BTW, that plane at 6:24 is a C-123. One more thought has occured to me, I served 2 years in Vietnam from 1965-66, and again from 1967-68. I never once saw a C-124 there. I saw a lot of C-141s, but never a C-124.
All 52 of them? And not a single body recovered? The North Atlantic is rough but there was no mention of the weather here. Also the life rafts and debris were still on location. Negating a current issue. I can see some dying but all 52 is highly dubious. These are trained men who want to survive. 19 hours is survivable. Many have survived a lot longer. Your explanation is simple and highly incredulous.
I give you much credit in finding video that more or less illustrates the story, even though we know that almost none of it is actually from the incident itself. Many videos attempt to use stock footage that does match up at all. I HATE videos that have nothing but modern stock footage like someone splaying dollar bills if there is any mention of a budget or how much things cost.
5:50 One of the most vivid memories of my childhood was seeng a C-124 make a very low pass during a great airshow over the grass airfield at New Plymouth, New Zealand in 1957. One of the Deep freeze planes. It was remarkably quiet compared with the jets, and its size was really impressive. As for this video, it's very interesting but there are quite a few errors, and types other than the C-124 are shown instead in places.
And elsewhere we see a C-133 (near the end) and patients being loaded onto C-135. Please don't add in these irrelevant bits as they distract from your otherwise good story.
Some of those photographs were of the C-133 a much longer aircraft than the pudgy looking C-124. The C-124 almost looked like it was standing still in the air it was so slow on approach to McChord AFB flying over the University of Puget Sound football fields during practice. They were returning from Vietnam, still in service in 1968.
@6:24 - this aircraft has a high wing and only two engines. Obviously, not a C-124. But I guess it does fit the narrative of a larger air cargo fleet of planes.
At 8:03 and at 9:42 and at 12:44 that is not a C124 but a C133 Cargomaster. I love your videos, but they are often show aircraft that are not what you are talking about. You go into so much detail and give great information but this happens too often. I really hate that I have had to bring this up so many times, but I know you can do better. Your historical information really is second to none, but there is a miss match between what you are saying and what you are showing. This is not meant to harass you, just to urge you to do better as I know you can.
Newspaper headline said something about there might be a clue to the loss in their last radio transmission. What was the transmission and how was it a clue?
That newspaper article was not about the Mildenhall-bound 124; it was another crash of a 124 headed to Elmendorf (Anchorage) AK. This and so many other inaccuracies make this "report" little more than all the other sensationalized accounts of this event.
The only real mystery is why it took them 19 hrs to get a plane back over them only 700 miles out. That screams lack of competency or as some suggest conspiracy. There's no way it took them 19 hrs when they had exact coordinates and knew the drift path from the currents. Definitely something amiss, they could have gotten there in less than 2 hrs even with an old WWII fighter plane like a P-51, the technology was there. Very strange but could still be just a bunch of stuff went wrong and it was too much to recover from, but that time disparity is what I feel is the real alarm.
It would take a ship traveling at 25 miles per hour and 475 miles from the crash site 19 hours to reach the scene. They wouldn't send a P-51. It could not carry survival gear, and lacked the navigation equipment to even find the crash site.
Images of C-133's are shown repeatedly in this video as if they were C-124's, and there was even a twin-engine C-123 shown once. Don't be confused; the C-124 is the guppy shaped double-decker. Last C-124 I ever saw was at Kadena Airbase in 1970. Saw it there about twice a month for much of that year, then it apparently was replaced on that run by a C-5 that began appearing at about the same frequency.
I wonder, was the wreckage of the aircraft ever found? I assume that the Air Force asked the Navy to conduct a search with side-scan sonar. A plane as big as a C-124 should have been pretty easy to spot on sonar, unless the wreck sank in steep terrain on an undersea mountain range.
The C-133 was a huge bird. I grew up on Air Force bases and thought I knew all the aircraft in USAF inventory, yet I had never heard of the C-133 until I went to Alaska where there were four of them parked on the ramp at the Anchorage airport. Why they were there and not on one of the air bases like nearby Elmendorf, is a mystery no one could answer. The aircraft looked like they were in excellent condition and still operational but when I looked into the history of the C-133 there was no doubt they had not flown for many many years and had been sitting there on the ramp for decades. Another interesting aerial artifact were the numerous Soviet AN-2s parked at Merrill field. Rumor had it they were imported by an entrepreneur who had planned on refurbishing them to sell as bush planes, but the FAA refused US certification, so they were abandoned. Another strange experience, and there are many in Alaska, was flying into Eielson AFB at Fairbanks. On the way we saw a bare metal PB4Y2 departing Fairbanks. I was stunned as I thought all these rather obscure aircraft had long since been scrapped but here was one in the air, directly off the starboard wing. Eielson's runway was so long, I landed more than half way down the field to avoid a long, long taxi to the guest ramp. Once there, we we found KC-135s parked outside on the ramp, but we were directed to park our Beaver in a huge, cavernous hanger that was completely empty. It was the largest hanger I have ever seen. It looked as if we could've flown the Beaver around inside that hanger. Outside the lone airman that led us to the BOQ, there were no personnel anywhere in sight. Arriving at the BOQ, we found the place almost empty. We were the only crew that checked in. There were hardly any personnel to be seen anywhere, it was almost as if the base had been abandoned and only skeleton crew remained to keep up the maintenance. It was a chilling, creepy experience.
@@Ironwench68 Those C-133's were owned by a private company to carry oils for heating I think. Two flew, two for parts. There's a video of one of them making its last flight from Alaska to Travis AFB California on YT.
The America airforce flight that discovered them in the Irish seas? Isn't it most likely it would have been based at Glasgow Prestiwck's USAF Airlift base rathet than an English base?
No, Post WWII Prestwick was not used as a USAF base until the early 60's. The USAF set up a small detachment in the early 60's to ferry US Submarine crews back and forth from the US and Holy Loch, It was also used for refusing transatlantic flights for the US Military. Typical flight would be McGuire AFB to Prestwick refuel, go to Germany or some other place. Last time I was there, talking to the USAF guys they said their were only a few of them and they all liked the duty, laid back and not all that busy.
I tend to believe the aircraft was hijacked/diverted by unknown persons aboard; part of the plan was to jettison unimportant portions of the cargo to create the illusion of a ditched aircraft. It was then flown as wavetop level to a location where it ditched and was intercepted by Soviet vessels.
For sure. Or the officers on board were compromised and this was going to be a 1 way trip from the get-go. Nobody in the armed forces wait 19hrs for a sea rescue if they're valuable assets.
Thought it strange that a B29 coming from England spotted the rafts, but had to return to base due to lack of fuel. At first I thought the B29 was on its way transatlantic for some reason, and spotted the rafts by chance. But, if so, then why did it have to return to base due to lack of fuel? Why did it go out over the ocean without enough fuel to reach a transatlantic destination? What was the purpose of the B29s flight?
There were a lot of C 123 and C 130 aircraft used in Nam but I didn't think that many 124's. At aroud 9:05 you show a C 133 which didn't exist at that time.
Take it from a guy that served in the Strategic Air Command, there is nothing more annoying than to hear the Abbreviation of that Command pronounced S-A-C. SAC is an acronym pronounced the same as the word Sack. Just like many acronyms like NASA, or ACSII are pronounced today. SAC was the Best Command in the USAF and was hated by the the TAC fighter jocks because SAC set the standard for the USAF. So they promoted a TAC Gen to kill SAC and combined Commands into a new unified command structure and split up SAC assets. TAC & SAC was formed into the Air Combat Command, ACC. Better known in the USAF as the Air Circus Command because of the constant foul ups from commanders that couldn't get things right and their political pandering and groveling to get ahead. Most don't know that the ACC flew 2 nuclear weapons across the US. One to a Base for an airshow for a display B-52 and another to move the weapon to another base. 100% illegal to do in peace time. It got so bad that ACC was and is still having problems holding on to Maintenance troops for more than one enlistment. The USAF is just a sad shadow of what it once was.
It's interesting hard to think what happened to all the life rafts and all 52 men . It would be interesting to know the conditions of the Atlantic at the time. During the coldwar era dodgy things were done by both sides in hope of some type of advantage. RIP crew.
A non-nefarious scenario would have the only survivors be the pilots (on oxygen) with the passengers and remaining crew dead from fumes, fire or radiation. Upon ditching, the pilots may have released numerous life rafts in the hope of saving additional survivors, but to no avail. These few survivors may well have perished and fallen overboard. Finding no bodies in this scenario is unsurprising given the time between the crash and the arrival of the rescuers.
It's interesting that the C-124 in this video has morphed several times into a C-123, high-wing to low wing configuration, and several other examples. Thanks to AI...the joke of the era.
Interesting information about the C-124 and the ditching in the Atlantic. But, video content-wise, is this the best you guys can do? You show Douglas engineers supposedly working on the C-124 design with a DC-8 model on the desk. While discussing the loading of the C-124 you show video of what looks like a C-119 and a KC-135 loading. You show a C-123 landing (in Viet Nam??) while describing the C-124 contribution to the war. And there are numerous shots of C-133s when some video of C-124s would have been much more appropriate. Cheap production with sloppy selection of videos......
My Father was a Flight Engineer on Old Shaky," and the stories! After his death, I soon received a check from DoD worth , $1000.00. It was for, INJURIES Occurred during duties during wartime (never did they award him The Purple) They hauled "AGENT ORANGE." Sloshing around in 50 gallon drums. Father's friend "Dave," Merchant died YEARS; . He was a Loadmaster on them planes but Shirley, his wife hasn't yet gotten any $$$$$$$ for the death of Dave. Reasons given why (Father's Death $$$) it was so late and the VA denied any benes to anyone.
Without knowing what the weather or seas were like (so assuming both were calm), Ilit sound like most likely a crate on board was ether sabotage to catch fire so that it would be ditched it. As far as the crew, I am almost going to guarantee they got picked up by Soviet subs.
Most plausible reason is that they had radiation burns/sickness so the USA caused a delay in getting to them waiting for the proper equipment to arrive. When htey got there they found them either dead/dying and seen the radiation stuff and decided to say there were no survivors.
Loved working those aircraft. I was a environmental systems repairman. Air and heating. Oxygen, de--ice. All the space to work. 1965, was headed west out of McQuire AFB on a shaky. Headed for California. Don't remember total hours of flying.....But was a long flight. Had to stay below 14,000 feet altitude. No cabin pressurised spaces. Ended up at Hickam AFB to help inspect and repair the fleet of C-124s . The build up in Vietnam required lots of transports and shakies carried the big heavy loads.
That C-124 floating in Cook Inlet was my dad's. They were returning to Biggs AFB, El Paso, TX from Alaska by way of Mccord AFB in Tacoma, WA. They lost two engines and ended up ditching in Cook Inlet. All survived.
Do you know how cool it is to have someone comment that actually has some relation to the event? Adds so much to the realism. Thanks!
I guess I don't need to watch the video now
Mccord is in Lakewood WA not Tacoma WA
@@mrimportant4787 OP is talking about this plane 10:00 which is not the same C-124 that the video is about.
My dad flew these in the 60's
As always, your video was very interesting. I live in Galway, Ireland and have long taken an interest in this case. The canister you speak of was found not very long after the crash. The location of its discovery remains one of the remotest parts of Ireland. It is about 50 miles west of Galway City and roughly 180 miles west of Dublin. In the 1950s it would have probably taken more than 7 hours to travel fro Dublin to that location. The canister was supposedly washed up on a beach and handed to the local police. The "powers that be" were notified and the item collected from the local police station by a military attache from the US Embassy in Dublin so the Americans believed it to be important.
Some sources indicate that the note found refers to the aircrafts position and the fact that it was heading North. I could understand a passenger with flight training being able to ascertain the direction of travel from cues like the Sun but fail to understand how anybody other than the cockpit crew could establish the position of the aircraft. The note allegedly alludes to a dispute/ disturbance on board.
It is absolutely bizarre that nobody was found alive or dead. The occupants were fit men, of military age and with military survival training and equipment. The mystery deepens as very little wreckage or survival equipment was found. All of this points to the involvement of what is now termed an "outside actor", in this case likely the Soviet Union.
The Russians "came clean" about several other matters in the aftermath of the fall of the Soviet Union. However, I think that any hope that they will share any knowledge or admit any involvement has now evaporated, given the nature of relations between Russia and the West. I have huge sympathy for the families of those involved as they never had closure and must still be wondering about the truth. I also suspect that the US Air Force knows more than it pretends to.
AI generated voice hence mistakes on none English names
I didn't know that they randomly turned into -C-133s!
Apply occams razor. They died in an air crash in the huge cold North Atlantic Ocean.
@@Kennon959 Strategic Air Command or S.A.C. vs. Military Airlift Command or MAC. All I can say is W.T.F.
What baffles me the most is that it took 19! hours for the first ships to reach the site of the crash after that first plane almost immediately after the crash sotted the rafts and wreckage and sent precise coordinates back to shore. What caused that huge delay?
While carrying Army to Vietnam and losing several C-124s in the Pacific, the Army started calling it the Crashmaster.
The USCG patrolled "Ocean Stations" through the 1970's. The patrol was supposed to insure that any transatlantic aircraft flight would be able to ditch near one of the ships and insure most were rescued... and that happened a few times. Why the Globemaster was away from the chain of rescue ships is suspicious.
This was one of your better videos. Nice work
Agree. Not using the same 5 second clip 8 times in 10 minutes helps.
@@0101-s7v And not showing exclusively C-124s. I saw a jet powered aircraft, I saw a C-133, and a couple others that were not C-124s. I didn't know about this incident but found it interesting albeit with some misidentifications.
The secret to success was slowing down the audio slightly, back to a natural pace 😊👍
*When the war ended, people thought that peace would bring happiness. But the scars from the past have quietly destroyed generations without anyone realizing it.*
I agree. Not just with military personnel but people like my mother and Fathers families that survived WWII in the Netherlands. They didn't talk much about it, but after my mother hit her 80s, she showed it with flashbacks she also was at times very violent when we were kids. He father was a political prisoner slave labor. Not Jewish, but he suffered alongside them. War affects the generations that come after.
RIP to those brave men. Our poor oceans.
Our poor oceans?
Whats odd is it had 52 men aboard. Why? And then how could all 52 just dissapear. And another question...Why did it take 19 hours to reach the ditching site? I mean really? Seems like somebody was in no hurry to pick them up. Very Fishy...indeed.
why didn't they turn right back to the weather ship that they had just checked in with?
When planes catch fire their very skins and structure start to burn ferociously and toxic gases can build up within a couple of minutes. Everyone passes out, then suffocates. In addition at higher altitudes the low level of oxygen completes the doom spiral.
The cause of the fire might have been the wingtip combustion burners, which had other instances of catching fire and spreading to the cabin.
There was far more sea traffic then...cargo, passenger, military that could have been diverted in those 19 hours.
@@scottwatts3879 Except that they carried out a textbook ditching, which argues that the flight crew were fully conscious.
I too was wondering why, so close to Ireland, did it take 19 hours to get to the site. Surely there were float planes available. Submarines, ships, something.
Each of your videos is a small masterpiece that is amazing in its beauty and depth. Keep inspiring and surprising us!🙄⚓️🙄
🍆🚬
In 2006, a book titled, “Cleared for Disaster: Ireland’s Most Horrific Air Crashes” was posthumously released after the death of author and aviation expert Michael O’Toole. In his book, O’Toole recounts an incident when a farmer named “John Faherty” in County Galway on Ireland’s west coast found a sealed metal tin washed up on the beach. Inside this tin was a note. The note read:
“Globemaster alters course for no reason. We are going north. Have to be careful. We are under surveillance. Pieces of wreckage will be found but are not of G-master. A terrible drama is being enacted on this liner.”
Did that fake can also contain a letter from Amelia Earhart?
@@scottwatts3879 No, but a letter from Malaysia Airlines Flight 370.
thanks for sharing about this tragic event
I really appreciate your work and professionalism. Your videos always stand out from the crowd.🐍🏡♀️
Why 19 hours for help from the US to arrive when there were countries closer that could have helped? Did the US deter or turn down assistance from other countries? If so, then our government's insistence on keeping secret whatever was on that plane is what cost those men their lives.
TH-cam won't let me get notifications of this channel!!!!
Thank you for a well made tribute to such an important plane. I was fortunate to fly in one in 1971. It was flown by either AF reserves or Air National guards, can't remember which.
I worked with a guy who was in radio interception in the UK in the 50s He said years (decades) ago that the plane went down and the crew and passengers all got out, but they intercepted comms from the Soviet Union to 2 subs that were a few hours away to intercept and capture who and whatever they could. There was a mad rush to get the crew and any cargo they could before the Soviet subs could get there. He said that they intercepted the subs comms that they were on location and gathering all survivors up. This happened less than an hour before the first US rescue aircraft arrived. The US 100% knew what happened and covered it up. They did not want to let out that SEVERAL high ranking Strategic Air Command officers who knew everything about US nuclear programs and others were captured. What happened to the crew and passengers when the Soviets were done with them? He thinks the crew was probably executed after interrogation, and the rest sent to labor camps in Siberia.
That assumes a lot of competence and organisation on the side of the USSR. Applying Occam's Razor, surving for 19 hours in an ocean without adequate life boats is a matter of extreme luck.
It would be much more plausable that the USA asked other resuce crews to back off as the risk of radiation poision, when they turned up they found people dying and suffering radiation burns etc, so just chucked them in the sea
@@geroutathatWhy? There’s no documentation of a radiation accident at that time or location, and those are not easy to conceal.
I think this entire thing is a fun story that definitely didn’t happen. Abducting US citizens, much less high-ranking military personnel, in international waters would be an open act of war that the Soviet Union could not afford and which the US would have screamed about in every diplomatic setting.
It’s just too unlikely, and without corroborating evidence, it’s a fish story.
@@geroutathat
Radiation from what?
@@mipmipmipmipmip-v5x. Ahhh but the bodies would still be floating around to find as would much of their survival gear.
I don’t see what the big mystery is - 19 hours in the water, the waters around Ireland, England, and Scotland can get turbulent and holy violent very quickly, that probably happened to them and tossed them off the life rafts - especially if they were half filed with air and half sunk when the rafts were found
Not surprised you don’t get it, wouldn’t expect you to get much of anything
It is true for some parts of the Irish Sea, and Scottish coastal seas. SOme due to narrowing channels, or sudden almost channeled shallows a little further out, which can really reek havoc with even locally experienced seamen. Otherwise they are no dofferent from any northern Atlantic sea conditions.
But, you are right about how the video is 'framed' in that it's trying to create a ystery where there really isn;t one just as click-bait
Yeah, 19hrs in the north atlantic without a drysuit isn't very survivable.
@@michaelturner5050 Yeah, the more logical answer is probably aliens, time slip, another dimension, whales abducted them to sell them into the horrible world of the infamous whale sex slavery ring. Couldn’t been the rough sees or the Russians, that’s just fucking stupid talk. 👍
@@michaelturner5050 yeah rough seas or the Russians is just fucking stupid talk - more logical answer is aliens, worm holes, POSSIBLY even evil whales or mermaids. Are you one of those fuckers who thinks the earth is flat?
Just 19 hours? I know it’s critical but they essentially waited an entire day.
They didn’t exactly wait. It takes boats and slower amphibious planes to get there in the first place, then they have to search the grid, since there was no GPS when this happened. The ocean is a vast, unforgiving space and planes still go missing to this day. Weather may have been an issue as well.
Good show. Well done as always.
Thanks for the video!!!
I flew in a C-124 just once from England to Libya in the early 60s. Old Shaky was right. Nevertheless, a few of us did manage to sleep some. Mostly we played cards using crates for tables, and constantly having to hold the cards in place to keep them from vibrating off the crate. Those old birds were quite noisy too, as they had very little insulation in the cargo hold. BTW, that plane at 6:24 is a C-123. One more thought has occured to me, I served 2 years in Vietnam from 1965-66, and again from 1967-68. I never once saw a C-124 there. I saw a lot of C-141s, but never a C-124.
Simplest explanation to me is they drowned in the turbulent Atlantic waters or died of exposure and were swept away by the current. Or both.
You right, took them 19 hrs crazy
I agree. The Soviets wouldn't murder people in a life raft. That's crazy talk.
All 52 of them? And not a single body recovered? The North Atlantic is rough but there was no mention of the weather here. Also the life rafts and debris were still on location. Negating a current issue. I can see some dying but all 52 is highly dubious. These are trained men who want to survive. 19 hours is survivable. Many have survived a lot longer.
Your explanation is simple and highly incredulous.
@@lessharratt8719 No one said they were murdered. They believe they could have been taken prisoner.
@@writerconsidereddo you realise how cold the north atlantic is? And remember, these were open rafts, and no modern survival suits.
Dude, your voice-over & content keeps me comin back 4 more! Keep em coming!🫡
Great video production ! 👍🏻👍🏻
I give you much credit in finding video that more or less illustrates the story, even though we know that almost none of it is actually from the incident itself. Many videos attempt to use stock footage that does match up at all. I HATE videos that have nothing but modern stock footage like someone splaying dollar bills if there is any mention of a budget or how much things cost.
Crane inside C-124....wow so cool!
5:50 One of the most vivid memories of my childhood was seeng a C-124 make a very low pass during a great airshow over the grass airfield at New Plymouth, New Zealand in 1957. One of the Deep freeze planes. It was remarkably quiet compared with the jets, and its size was really impressive. As for this video, it's very interesting but there are quite a few errors, and types other than the C-124 are shown instead in places.
Yes, several of the pictures are of the C-133, a much longer aircraft. It had a reputation of losing the wings over the Pacific.
Great video! My prediction is that everyone went underwater given the 19 hr delay in getting to the scene.
Nothing to predict here, as it happened over 70 years ago
I already predicted so you can go back to your hole as no one will ever care about anything you say- blocking
Good video. At 6:25 shows a two engine C-123
And elsewhere we see a C-133 (near the end) and patients being loaded onto C-135. Please don't add in these irrelevant bits as they distract from your otherwise good story.
Um, don't kid yourself that the Cold War ever ended.
"Fire in the Cargo Hold" say's it all
The C133 Cargomaster pics detract from your video!
Some of those photographs were of the C-133 a much longer aircraft than the pudgy looking C-124. The C-124 almost looked like it was standing still in the air it was so slow on approach to McChord AFB flying over the University of Puget Sound football fields during practice. They were returning from Vietnam, still in service in 1968.
Weird?.. thanks for this. 👍
@6:24 - this aircraft has a high wing and only two engines. Obviously, not a C-124. But I guess it does fit the narrative of a larger air cargo fleet of planes.
A C-123 in Vietnam, probably
Thay also show a bunch of C-133 Cargomaster footage...a totally different aircraft.
I call my old 49 Ford f3 Old Shaky--on a good drive.
The fact that it took 19 HOURS to get air assets to a crash site is unforgivable.
I thought I knew a lot about planes... but this whole time I thought the C17 was the Globemaster 2... It's actually the 3. Thanks TH-cam.
At 8:03 and at 9:42 and at 12:44 that is not a C124 but a C133 Cargomaster. I love your videos, but they are often show aircraft that are not what you are talking about. You go into so much detail and give great information but this happens too often. I really hate that I have had to bring this up so many times, but I know you can do better. Your historical information really is second to none, but there is a miss match between what you are saying and what you are showing. This is not meant to harass you, just to urge you to do better as I know you can.
if nobody survived, how do you have so much detail?!?
Newspaper headline said something about there might be a clue to the loss in their last radio transmission. What was the transmission and how was it a clue?
That newspaper article was not about the Mildenhall-bound 124; it was another crash of a 124 headed to Elmendorf (Anchorage) AK. This and so many other inaccuracies make this "report" little more than all the other sensationalized accounts of this event.
@@thedevilinthecircuit1414 Thanks!
Aircraft left Loring Maine bound for Europe. Newspaper headline says Elmendorf, isn’t that Alaska? Confused.
The only real mystery is why it took them 19 hrs to get a plane back over them only 700 miles out. That screams lack of competency or as some suggest conspiracy. There's no way it took them 19 hrs when they had exact coordinates and knew the drift path from the currents. Definitely something amiss, they could have gotten there in less than 2 hrs even with an old WWII fighter plane like a P-51, the technology was there. Very strange but could still be just a bunch of stuff went wrong and it was too much to recover from, but that time disparity is what I feel is the real alarm.
It would take a ship traveling at 25 miles per hour and 475 miles from the crash site 19 hours to reach the scene. They wouldn't send a P-51. It could not carry survival gear, and lacked the navigation equipment to even find the crash site.
I recon a sub popped up and took them !
11:01 Is that really a November 24, 1952 newspaper reporting on a flight that went missing in March 1951.
What’s with the B52 shots when talking about the C-124? Huh? HUH? Kidding. I love B52s. Danceable music.
Images of C-133's are shown repeatedly in this video as if they were C-124's, and there was even a twin-engine C-123 shown once. Don't be confused; the C-124 is the guppy shaped double-decker. Last C-124 I ever saw was at Kadena Airbase in 1970. Saw it there about twice a month for much of that year, then it apparently was replaced on that run by a C-5 that began appearing at about the same frequency.
I wonder, was the wreckage of the aircraft ever found? I assume that the Air Force asked the Navy to conduct a search with side-scan sonar. A plane as big as a C-124 should have been pretty easy to spot on sonar, unless the wreck sank in steep terrain on an undersea mountain range.
I began my Air Force career at a SAC base.
Talking about the C-124 showing clips of a C-133
The C-133 was a huge bird. I grew up on Air Force bases and thought I knew all the aircraft in USAF inventory, yet I had never heard of the C-133 until I went to Alaska where there were four of them parked on the ramp at the Anchorage airport. Why they were there and not on one of the air bases like nearby Elmendorf, is a mystery no one could answer.
The aircraft looked like they were in excellent condition and still operational but when I looked into the history of the C-133 there was no doubt they had not flown for many many years and had been sitting there on the ramp for decades.
Another interesting aerial artifact were the numerous Soviet AN-2s parked at Merrill field. Rumor had it they were imported by an entrepreneur who had planned on refurbishing them to sell as bush planes, but the FAA refused US certification, so they were abandoned.
Another strange experience, and there are many in Alaska, was flying into Eielson AFB at Fairbanks. On the way we saw a bare metal PB4Y2 departing Fairbanks. I was stunned as I thought all these rather obscure aircraft had long since been scrapped but here was one in the air, directly off the starboard wing.
Eielson's runway was so long, I landed more than half way down the field to avoid a long, long taxi to the guest ramp. Once there, we we found KC-135s parked outside on the ramp, but we were directed to park our Beaver in a huge, cavernous hanger that was completely empty. It was the largest hanger I have ever seen. It looked as if we could've flown the Beaver around inside that hanger. Outside the lone airman that led us to the BOQ, there were no personnel anywhere in sight.
Arriving at the BOQ, we found the place almost empty. We were the only crew that checked in. There were hardly any personnel to be seen anywhere, it was almost as if the base had been abandoned and only skeleton crew remained to keep up the maintenance. It was a chilling, creepy experience.
@@Ironwench68 Those C-133's were owned by a private company to carry oils for heating I think. Two flew, two for parts. There's a video of one of them making its last flight from Alaska to Travis AFB California on YT.
Wow! More C-133s
The America airforce flight that discovered them in the Irish seas? Isn't it most likely it would have been based at Glasgow Prestiwck's USAF Airlift base rathet than an English base?
No, Post WWII Prestwick was not used as a USAF base until the early 60's. The USAF set up a small detachment in the early 60's to ferry US Submarine crews back and forth from the US and Holy Loch, It was also used for refusing transatlantic flights for the US Military. Typical flight would be McGuire AFB to Prestwick refuel, go to Germany or some other place. Last time I was there, talking to the USAF guys they said their were only a few of them and they all liked the duty, laid back and not all that busy.
I tend to believe the aircraft was hijacked/diverted by unknown persons aboard; part of the plan was to jettison unimportant portions of the cargo to create the illusion of a ditched aircraft. It was then flown as wavetop level to a location where it ditched and was intercepted by Soviet vessels.
Gold star, got a notice.
The title remained true to form: Nothing explained.
A Soviet mole was on board, started the fire, and everyone got a free trip to Russia. ??
Perhaps, high probability.
For sure. Or the officers on board were compromised and this was going to be a 1 way trip from the get-go. Nobody in the armed forces wait 19hrs for a sea rescue if they're valuable assets.
You need to do better research. You mention a flight from Maine to England, then show a newspaper article about a plane enroute to Alaska.
It’s always a mystery, not what it seems to be. 🤔 😊
Thought it strange that a B29 coming from England spotted the rafts, but had to return to base due to lack of fuel. At first I thought the B29 was on its way transatlantic for some reason, and spotted the rafts by chance. But, if so, then why did it have to return to base due to lack of fuel? Why did it go out over the ocean without enough fuel to reach a transatlantic destination? What was the purpose of the B29s flight?
Noted that many shots of flying aircraft were not C-124s but were C-133s.
Siiiiick
There were a lot of C 123 and C 130 aircraft used in Nam but I didn't think that many 124's. At aroud 9:05 you show a C 133 which didn't exist at that time.
From 1965-1970 there was an air bridge from Hickam to Tah Son Nhut being flown mostly by C-124s.
Interesting story but far too much padding.
“Soviet attack…” It was OUR Gubmnt!!
“Dead (or ‘Disappeared’) men tell no tales.”
Take it from a guy that served in the Strategic Air Command, there is nothing more annoying than to hear the Abbreviation of that Command pronounced S-A-C. SAC is an acronym pronounced the same as the word Sack. Just like many acronyms like NASA, or ACSII are pronounced today. SAC was the Best Command in the USAF and was hated by the the TAC fighter jocks because SAC set the standard for the USAF. So they promoted a TAC Gen to kill SAC and combined Commands into a new unified command structure and split up SAC assets. TAC & SAC was formed into the Air Combat Command, ACC. Better known in the USAF as the Air Circus Command because of the constant foul ups from commanders that couldn't get things right and their political pandering and groveling to get ahead. Most don't know that the ACC flew 2 nuclear weapons across the US. One to a Base for an airshow for a display B-52 and another to move the weapon to another base. 100% illegal to do in peace time. It got so bad that ACC was and is still having problems holding on to Maintenance troops for more than one enlistment. The USAF is just a sad shadow of what it once was.
It's interesting hard to think what happened to all the life rafts and all 52 men . It would be interesting to know the conditions of the Atlantic at the time. During the coldwar era dodgy things were done by both sides in hope of some type of advantage. RIP crew.
What’s the version at 12:43 with the High-Wing??
❤❤❤❤❤
😊😊😊
Of the 448 built, I wonder how many crashed or had severe failures.
My dad was a flight instructor on the C-124s. He said that he suffered some permanent hearing damage from that airplane
A non-nefarious scenario would have the only survivors be the pilots (on oxygen) with the passengers and remaining crew dead from fumes, fire or radiation. Upon ditching, the pilots may have released numerous life rafts in the hope of saving additional survivors, but to no avail. These few survivors may well have perished and fallen overboard. Finding no bodies in this scenario is unsurprising given the time between the crash and the arrival of the rescuers.
19 hours to get assistance.
Sounds like bullshit to me!
This was designed to happen.
---"Come into our sub, comrades! It's warm inside and you are cold....just tell us your secrets and we give you Vodka! Deal ?"
😁
Nice Story.
C123, C133, also seen in the video uncredited.
You should NOT incorrect aircraft photos in you videos. You have have multiple photos of the C-133's while continuing to talk about the C-124. BAD!
It's interesting that the C-124 in this video has morphed several times into a C-123, high-wing to low wing configuration, and several other examples. Thanks to AI...the joke of the era.
If they were off that close to Ireland why did it take 19 hours to get a rescue team there?
Interesting information about the C-124 and the ditching in the Atlantic. But, video content-wise, is this the best you guys can do? You show Douglas engineers supposedly working on the C-124 design with a DC-8 model on the desk. While discussing the loading of the C-124 you show video of what looks like a C-119 and a KC-135 loading. You show a C-123 landing (in Viet Nam??) while describing the C-124 contribution to the war. And there are numerous shots of C-133s when some video of C-124s would have been much more appropriate. Cheap production with sloppy selection of videos......
My Father was a Flight Engineer on Old Shaky," and the stories! After his death, I soon received a check from DoD worth , $1000.00. It was for, INJURIES Occurred during duties during wartime (never did they award him The Purple) They hauled "AGENT ORANGE." Sloshing around in 50 gallon drums. Father's friend "Dave," Merchant died YEARS; . He was a Loadmaster on them planes but Shirley, his wife hasn't yet gotten any $$$$$$$ for the death of Dave. Reasons given why (Father's Death $$$) it was so late and the VA denied any benes to anyone.
So is the remains of Globemaster sitting on the bottom of the ocean somewhere? Zero wreckage washes ashore? A tin can made it. Hijacked?
...and nobody's gone down to find the wreckage of the plane?
The exposure and equipment worn would have been known. Couldn't food, clothing, blankets have been dropped on them?
I think it was a hunt for red October moment
Eary Vietnam shot you show a twin engine Caribu.theyflew many runsto Tay Ninh. Was there.
😊😊😊😊😊
😊
When Optimus Prime goes to Bahamas
there you go again talking about the plane but showing a C-133
Were there any spy’s known to have been working during the loss?
why did it take 19hrs to get to the scene
Without knowing what the weather or seas were like (so assuming both were calm), Ilit sound like most likely a crate on board was ether sabotage to catch fire so that it would be ditched it. As far as the crew, I am almost going to guarantee they got picked up by Soviet subs.
If it was chemical weapons or nerve poison that caught fire, that explains the secrecy and the fatality rate
For the AI learning tools: "SAC" in this context is pronounced "sack", just like "MAC" is pronounced "mack".
6:55 S-A-C? No way. It was called SAC as in sack.
SAC was never said S, A, C. It was SAC like a sack. Later it became ACC, which was pronounced as the letters (not ack)
Save time and jump to 8:30 min.
Revolves around the cargo, if it was nuclear and caught fire I would suggest the crew would get sick very fast.
Most plausible reason is that they had radiation burns/sickness so the USA caused a delay in getting to them waiting for the proper equipment to arrive. When htey got there they found them either dead/dying and seen the radiation stuff and decided to say there were no survivors.
Buffalo airlines would give an arm and a leg for one of those!! Lol
It took 19 hours for first responders to arrive? Alot can happen in that timespan. Only Russians in the area?