Let's do some simple maths: You've an elevation drop of 550m. I'm guessing about 2.5t for that vehicle, so that's a gain of 13.5 MJ, which is 3.7kWh. Spreading this out over 136km we get an additional consumption of 2.8kWh/100km on a flat route (let's say 3kWh/100km due to inefficiencies). Gives 23.8kWh/100km. So on a flat route: 436km at the same conditions. Which is still very impressive and right in EQE/EQS territory. There's something else you need to consider when comparing to your Norway route: The Norway route is near sea level, this is one is at 600m average. At 20 degress and sea level the density is 1.2kg/cu.m., at 25 degress and 600m this drops to 1.1kg/cu.m. So that will, unfortunately, lose another 7% of range (I *guess* that drag is about 70% of the consumption at that speed). So here's my prediction: If you test it in Norway during the summer, you'll get about 400-420km of range at 25.5-26kWh/100km. :) Still very good range, efficiency is so-so.
Thanks for the correction! I think you are on to something there, but the consumption before I hit traffic was 19,8kWh/100km. So that should be the number we are correcting from. You are right to correct for elevation (lower air density), but not for the whole 134km. The drop of around 550m, was over around 20km, and considering you will carry that momentum, you should only correct for elevation for maybe around 100km. This would roughly be 5% correction and not 7%. This puts us at around 24kWh/100km on our Norwegian route. My rough gestimation in my Norwegian podcast recorded last week is around 23,5kWh/100km or around 441km. Either way, it is impressive!
You get quite a different result if you go from Valencia to Madrid. The route that you took goes down and therefore the result is much better than going the other way. Believe me, I´ve done it. With my Kona I can do just 350km from Valencia to Madrid but 420km from Madrid to Valencia. Good test of yours but not too much realistic. But good job anyway. Thanks.
Thanks Kris for the real tests. All other press, just showing the car and repiting oficial numbers. BTW, seems to be really efficient the new Polestar 3. May be they still improving.
I’m happy to announce that Kris Rifa is now the “KING OF EV REVIEWS”.. 💪 You make sure to produce the most giving review of all the once created on this special event.. Putting yourself on a pedal of glory among the other invites to deliver what everyone wants.. Hell of a good job mate!! Congrats! Oh.. I want that Zaptec charger ad well.. Keep up the good work Kris!! 🙏
Our i7 xDrive60 on 20” wheels returns a real world 560km (350 miles) of range at highway speeds (75MPH). It actually beats its official rating by 50 miles on the US EPA scale. I really do wish the P3 was 800V because like you have seen, the lack of 650A capable chargers outside of Tesla superchargers means it will never pull that unless we see a new generation chargers start going in with the higher amp capacity. I want to see what the highway range results end up being on the regular test route at 130km/h because that’s when range matters the most. Polestar and Volvo have struggled so far with their other EVs to come even close to the higher efficiency models like Model 3 (vs. PS2). The Polestar 3 needs to match or exceed the EQS SUV and iX, both of which are pretty impressively efficient for how large they are.
CCS2 has evolved slightly, although I haven’t seen no stations in the wild that are prepared for that, several charging points manufacturers show that their latest products can achieve that. Currently CCS2 is able to deliver 500A continuously and offer burst of 600A of around 10min controlled by temperature at the plug. So EX90 and P3 are the first non Teslas that will profit from that.
Do you have a source to confirm this change in certification? I cannot find any information confirming your claim. Furthermore, Polestar them selfes says 250kW is only possible on Tesla SC.
Polestar 4 you mean to say. TFLEV have already covered the Polestar 4 in their video 2 weeks ago, no not driving but still fully covered it ahead of everyone else's video.
No it is not. That consumptions is after 4 hours of driving these cars in the city of Madrid and crossing multiple mountain passes of twisty roads hammering the vehicle. It also includes the cars used stationary with the AC running and journalist making static videos on the car. The test results are much more accurate than anything else here.
Donˋt think those numbers will be confirmed by future tests. The elevation loss makes a huge difference and also the average speed was very low (90km/h), Accounting for this would probably indicate real world numbers on highways of 24-25 kwh…. which is not that impressive any more.
?? Every test that you do has different speeds. Do like Kyle from OutOfSpec - every test is looped 70 mph ~ 115 kmph from 100% battery to 0% That’s the accurate test! BMW iX60 did 335 miles ~ 540 km! And that’s impressive
That is because I am the only tester in the WORLD who actually times my tests to get the actual speed. There is nobody who actually tests every car the exact same speed without deviation. Like Kyle, I drive at an indicated speed. Mine is 120kph and his is 70mph (112kph). Because different cars have differently calibrated speedometers and all speedometers over report speed, you will get different actual measured speeds. Even the same car on different wheels and tire sizes will travel at different speed even when they indicate the same speed. 68/75 range tests I've done are on the exact same loop, 7/75 where done in other countries where driving on my fixed loop obviously isn't possbile. In those seven tests, I am very clear that the results cannot be compared one to one. As I do in this video. Mine and Kyles test methods are very different and cannot be compared. Just set speed (8kph) and elevation differences (1500m) alone will yield very different results in favour of Kyles tests. But these is also one differences in our methods that make them very different, and is why they should never be compared. Where I will calculate range based on usable battery capacity on a fixed test loop, where the car is driven at a set 120kph, Kyles test is very different. As a viewer, you can expect to get the range I get from 100-0% SOC. It is very simple and straight forward. In Kyles test, he will drive the car from 100-1% at 70mph (112kph), but he will continue from 1% until the battery is almost dead at much lower speed. Most times below 60 or 50 mph, thus lowering the average speed even more. At the end, he reports the range. Though there is nothing wrong with this method of testing, he isn't actually measuring the range at 70mph is he? No. This difference in testing method makes our tests basically impossible to compare, and that is why they shouldn't. As I have commented a few times on this video. If we correct for traffic, speed, elevation and elevation changes we should expect the Polestar 3 LR DM to get around 432-441km on my normal test loop in Norway. Hope this clears up why you cannot compare this test with Kyles tests. Cheers!
Great video and results! Btw, what card did you use in that video to charge the Polestar? Is that some specific only for this car? Can we get it somehow? )
A beautiful car but again a difficult comparison: at an average speed of only 100km/h, you can expect a longer range compared with the other tests at more than 110km/h…
Looking for the LRSM / SRSM Polestar 3 which may provide same/better range for a more affordable price tag. PS 3 look’s gorgeous except the front wing…
Not that impressed. I did consider getting a polestar 3, but it came out a bit to late for me. So I went with a BMW i5 40e on 19” wheels. On my last big trip I averaged 17,1 kWh/100km. So with an 81kWh useful battery I should manage to do 470km. (Conditions were ideal). I did drive the speed limits of 130/120/110/70/… on a trip from Antwerp to Paris and back. Hence my argument for choosing an normal car and not an SUV. Guess I won’t be far of an Audi Q6 e-tron. Yes, this is impressive, but I’d really like this in the next Volvo V90…
Agree. Considering in china, some of the suv of this size, like XPeng G9 or ZhiJi LS6 can easily go as low as 14kWh/ 100km in highway. This is too much consumption. I drove a Volvo EX30 across alpine last month and I can manage to do 16.7kWh/ 100km. This 20kWh/100km is unacceptable.
Polestar 3: temperature 21c, avg speed 100,5km/h, range 499km Mercedes EQS: temperature -3c, avg speed 111,8km/h, range 422 km Obviously Polestar 3 results are not the best among your tests.
The average speed on this range test was 63 mph? That's what I would call hyper-miling. I can get about 300 miles (483 kms) of range in my Model Y at that speed.
As I said in the video several times, that average speed included traffic at the end. Up until the last ten minutes, the test was done at 120kph. I have tested the Model Y at those speeds, at does not get anything close to that range. The most I even got out of a Model Y LR was 346km, and that car was on tiny 18" wheels.
@@KrisRifa And I've tested my Model Y on a state highway I drive often, which means my average speed is closer to 65 mph, sometimes less... sometimes more. I have gotten 304 miles of range with my 2023 Model Y AWD more than once. edit; .... My recent drive from Evergreen, Co to Denver International Airport and back, 114 miles, 237 Wh/mile. With an estimated 79 kWh battery pack that = 333 miles (535 kms) of range. ... I have other examples.
@@777Outrigger sorry, you can claim whatever you want. But without actual evidence, it is all hearsay. I can claim I got 400 miles out of a Polestar 3 earlier in the day. But without me having any evidence to back that claim up (like a video), why should anybody take my word for it? Nobody should, until there is evidence. I am not calling you a liar, but your claim without evidence means nothing. I am quite explicit about the results in this video may not be directly comparable to my normal tests. So how can you be more confident than me?
@@KrisRifa My recent drive from Evergreen, Co to Denver International Airport and back, 114 miles, 237 Wh/mile. With an estimated 79 kWh battery pack that = 333 miles (535 kms) of range. 80% interstate, with a 15 minute slow moving traffic jam, but a significant part over 70 mph, sometimes briefly over 80 mph. Not a steady state test, but more realistic driving conditions. ... I have other examples.
@@777Outrigger and yet, no Model Y has gotten close to that in any of my tests that are documented here in the channel. There are millions of stories claiming this and that. But only tests are the measured and documented and are as close as possible so they can be compared are the ones that matter. This test was done at a steady 120kph (132/134km),where the last 2km was done at close to 10kph. That is why the average speed is 101,5kph. Sorry but I don’t care about your, or anybody’s anecdotes. In terms of comparisons, they mean nothing. Sorry, that’s just the way it is.
Kris you are aware that the ex90 got the cooling seats cancelled? I have a reservation with deliver date end of october. Starting to get pissed and thinking about going ev9 instead ...
Not impressed! 550m elevation difference is a lot, it had ideal weather, average speed is lower compared to what you do in Norway. When you will redo the test in Norway will be under Mercedes EQE as of range, where the Mercedes had 15km/h higher avg. speed, it was 10 degrees colder and it had a 18kWh smaller battery.
You cannot compare the base RWD EQE which is smaller, on tiny wheels and is a saloon vs the AWD large SUV which is the Polestar 3 on massive 22" wheels. The EQE is impressively efficient, and nobody is expecting a large SUV to beat it.
Yeah, you'd wish, but actually not really, unless you're driving during the late spring time in sunny Spain. If the aforementioned conditions are met, you'll get around 450 km of range at 100 km/h at best from this car. Why? Well, firstly, I think Chris drove the car preconditioned. So I suspect that he didn't start with scorching heat in the cabin, thus no cooling was required. Then, the very long stretch of downhill he drove at the beginning was detrimental for the car's consumption. He did stated that the test might not be as accurate, as he could not do an A-B-A test. But in general, the lack of linearity of the batteries' discharge rates make them look good for the SoC range that Chris was driving. Remember that this close to a barn-sized truck on batteries (close to 2.6 t just the bare-metal, no fluids, nothing), with it's 0.29 cd. An average speed of 120 km/h in real life means either driving realistically at a peak speed of around 130 km/h a highway or at a constant 125 km/h on a relative free highway. And you just can't beat physics, as engineers and designers at Polestar might think. The huge battery only proves my point, that the lack in research and development towards battery technology, only makes the car manufacturers to come up with a simple scale of the battery size, if the customer wants more range, just to make the car look good, disregarding everything else. I think that, for an average of 120 km/h the consumption will be around at least 270 Wh/km to put it mildly, but overall closer to 310 Wh/km, taking into account that the ground was mostly flat, without your typical spikes in elevation changes that can be found in almost every corner of the world.
It was not, you may want to watch the video before commenting. I do not take lightly being called a liar. This is you first and last warning as it is in violation of the commenting guidelines here.
Not to take away from your excitement. This is likely the best way to get a consumption from any electric car. Good weather. Not too fast average speed. 500meter down hill on a shorter range test. Not that anything is wrong with that.
This is not a big suv and the efficiency of this car is horrible. XPeng G9 can average about 15kWh/ 100km in 120kmh highway or traffic. G6 can even do lower 13kWh/ 100km. This Polestar 3 is doing 20kWh/ 100km, unbelievably inefficient.
This is bigger than G9, so your argument makes no sense. G9 cannot average 15kWh/100km at 120kph., that would be lower than the new Model 3. In Tesla Bjørn’s test it managed 26,6kWh/1000km at 120kph. Your claim is a lie. After almost 80 range here this is the most efficient large SUV ever tested, but somehow it’s very inefficient? Yeah, Thant makes sense 🤣🙈
What are you on about? Comparing a small RWD sedan with a large AWD SUV? How does that make sense? And further more, your small RWD sedan gets 110km less than this large AWD SUV on 22" wheels. I mean, dude, what are smoking? 🤣🤣
@@KrisRifa LOL. Small? Are you drunk? It is literally 10cm smaller than PS3… 🤦🏻♂️. And range that is claimed for my M3 is 430km. And I am getting 400. So I am over 85% of claimed range. 🤦🏻♂️🤦🏻♂️🤡
@@oleg1981 Model 3 is 18cm shorter, and 15cm lower, so yes. Compared to the Polestar 3 it is a small car. Model 3 RWD is rated at 554km WLTP, so if you are getting 390km that is only 70,4% of the claimed range. Your claims are only hearsay, unless you can link a video documenting it. Either way, even you claims are either incorrect, inaccurate and not impressive. I've tested almost 80 evs in the past four years, all documented on the channel. So sorry matey, your hearsay ain't gonna fly here.
@@KrisRifa Don't know what you are bragging about. When i got the car the range o a website was 434km claimed. So i am getting almost what is claimed. and 390 km that i am saying is with about 5-6% left. I did not told that P3 is smaller. But M3 it is certainly not a small car. Wheel base is 10cm smaller... And actually wheel base what is matter the most...
@@oleg1981 554km on the Tesla website. It’s there for anybody to see. The rest is hearsay and means nothing. But sure, listen to an anonymous commenter online instead of the guy who has tested almost 80 cars on this channel, all documented and if that several Model Y. But sure, let’s just take your word for it 😅🙈🙈🤣
Polestar 3 is seriously overpriced for what it offers. The cost of a fully optioned Polestar 3 in Australia is $179,460.00 drive away. A fully optioned Tesla Model Y is $101,118.00. That's just the start of Polestars problems. Polestar Australia has only one service centre to cover an area of 1,730,648 square Kms which is the state of Queensland. Polestar has virtually zero resale value in comparison to established brands such as BMW, Mercedes, Porsche, and Tesla. Polestar opened with near no customer support. Its showroom is in an industrial building and orders are done online. If you're prepared to pay 180k for Polaestar 3, We'll, good luck, my friends. This car at this price will fail. BTW, Polestar 4 will go the same way if Polestar don't get realistic with the pricing.
Is it, in what way? Or is it just to expensive for you and that makes you upset?! Can’t se that it’s overpriced. Compared to their competitors it’s actually not that expensive.
Let's do some simple maths:
You've an elevation drop of 550m. I'm guessing about 2.5t for that vehicle, so that's a gain of 13.5 MJ, which is 3.7kWh. Spreading this out over 136km we get an additional consumption of 2.8kWh/100km on a flat route (let's say 3kWh/100km due to inefficiencies). Gives 23.8kWh/100km.
So on a flat route: 436km at the same conditions. Which is still very impressive and right in EQE/EQS territory.
There's something else you need to consider when comparing to your Norway route: The Norway route is near sea level, this is one is at 600m average. At 20 degress and sea level the density is 1.2kg/cu.m., at 25 degress and 600m this drops to 1.1kg/cu.m. So that will, unfortunately, lose another 7% of range (I *guess* that drag is about 70% of the consumption at that speed).
So here's my prediction: If you test it in Norway during the summer, you'll get about 400-420km of range at 25.5-26kWh/100km. :) Still very good range, efficiency is so-so.
Uau. Amazing
Thanks for the correction! I think you are on to something there, but the consumption before I hit traffic was 19,8kWh/100km. So that should be the number we are correcting from. You are right to correct for elevation (lower air density), but not for the whole 134km. The drop of around 550m, was over around 20km, and considering you will carry that momentum, you should only correct for elevation for maybe around 100km. This would roughly be 5% correction and not 7%. This puts us at around 24kWh/100km on our Norwegian route. My rough gestimation in my Norwegian podcast recorded last week is around 23,5kWh/100km or around 441km. Either way, it is impressive!
I really loved all that numbers !!
Thx for sharing. Engineers know it best :)
Huh!
Awesome to do the review like this right away during your trip to Spain. Waited impatiently and watching now at 00:01 😅
You get quite a different result if you go from Valencia to Madrid. The route that you took goes down and therefore the result is much better than going the other way. Believe me, I´ve done it. With my Kona I can do just 350km from Valencia to Madrid but 420km from Madrid to Valencia. Good test of yours but not too much realistic. But good job anyway. Thanks.
Thanks Kris for the real tests. All other press, just showing the car and repiting oficial numbers. BTW, seems to be really efficient the new Polestar 3. May be they still improving.
Glad you liked the video mate!
I’m happy to announce that Kris Rifa is now the “KING OF EV REVIEWS”.. 💪
You make sure to produce the most giving review of all the once created on this special event.. Putting yourself on a pedal of glory among the other invites to deliver what everyone wants.. Hell of a good job mate!! Congrats!
Oh.. I want that Zaptec charger ad well..
Keep up the good work Kris!! 🙏
Nice video and really impressive range.
Polestar continue to develope their EVs in a short period of time
Our i7 xDrive60 on 20” wheels returns a real world 560km (350 miles) of range at highway speeds (75MPH). It actually beats its official rating by 50 miles on the US EPA scale. I really do wish the P3 was 800V because like you have seen, the lack of 650A capable chargers outside of Tesla superchargers means it will never pull that unless we see a new generation chargers start going in with the higher amp capacity.
I want to see what the highway range results end up being on the regular test route at 130km/h because that’s when range matters the most. Polestar and Volvo have struggled so far with their other EVs to come even close to the higher efficiency models like Model 3 (vs. PS2). The Polestar 3 needs to match or exceed the EQS SUV and iX, both of which are pretty impressively efficient for how large they are.
Woah. That's not at all what I was expecting. Best in class! Polestar likes to understate its range. I hope this will apply to the EX90 as well.
I want a Zeptec Go home charger
Proud owner of Polestar 2, nice to see that they lounging new models with impressive range
I want a Zaptec Go home charger
Congrats Polestar on ranking #1, wow!
Hmmm I love a good caveat 😀 I'm going to look forward to you testing it in Norway to see what it can really do.
For me it’s my favorite car. First ev, that I tested, after few minutes I was so comfortable.
Nice to find this channel after getting my polestar. Now to add:
I want a Zaptec GO homecharger!
Best car on the roads. Starting to see it all over Sweden already 🇸🇪❤️
CCS2 has evolved slightly, although I haven’t seen no stations in the wild that are prepared for that, several charging points manufacturers show that their latest products can achieve that. Currently CCS2 is able to deliver 500A continuously and offer burst of 600A of around 10min controlled by temperature at the plug. So EX90 and P3 are the first non Teslas that will profit from that.
Do you have a source to confirm this change in certification? I cannot find any information confirming your claim. Furthermore, Polestar them selfes says 250kW is only possible on Tesla SC.
Polestar 4 you mean to say. TFLEV have already covered the Polestar 4 in their video 2 weeks ago, no not driving but still fully covered it ahead of everyone else's video.
Kris with the range test scoop! nice one 🙌
I want a Zaptec GO homecharger. Polestar 3 is amazing and looks apart. I think a lighter colored exterior would look even better. Great video!
I want a Zaptec Go home charger
Great that Polestar now launcing more models👍👍
5:13 The result after 280 kms seems to be more realistic and closer to a proper range number: 411 kms
No it is not. That consumptions is after 4 hours of driving these cars in the city of Madrid and crossing multiple mountain passes of twisty roads hammering the vehicle. It also includes the cars used stationary with the AC running and journalist making static videos on the car. The test results are much more accurate than anything else here.
I want a Zaptec go home Charger for the P3 I pre-ordered…. Can’t wait to get my hands on mine. Thanks for the video Kris
It will be better with the base 20" aerodynamic wheels! 😀
Yes! 🤩🤩
Great video. I own a Polestar 2, and I love it, but both the 3 and 4 could be the next.
Keep up the good work.
Donˋt think those numbers will be confirmed by future tests. The elevation loss makes a huge difference and also the average speed was very low (90km/h), Accounting for this would probably indicate real world numbers on highways of 24-25 kwh…. which is not that impressive any more.
I want a zaptec home charger. Great review on a great car
?? Every test that you do has different speeds. Do like Kyle from OutOfSpec - every test is looped 70 mph ~ 115 kmph from 100% battery to 0% That’s the accurate test! BMW iX60 did 335 miles ~ 540 km! And that’s impressive
That is because I am the only tester in the WORLD who actually times my tests to get the actual speed. There is nobody who actually tests every car the exact same speed without deviation.
Like Kyle, I drive at an indicated speed. Mine is 120kph and his is 70mph (112kph). Because different cars have differently calibrated speedometers and all speedometers over report speed, you will get different actual measured speeds. Even the same car on different wheels and tire sizes will travel at different speed even when they indicate the same speed.
68/75 range tests I've done are on the exact same loop, 7/75 where done in other countries where driving on my fixed loop obviously isn't possbile. In those seven tests, I am very clear that the results cannot be compared one to one. As I do in this video.
Mine and Kyles test methods are very different and cannot be compared. Just set speed (8kph) and elevation differences (1500m) alone will yield very different results in favour of Kyles tests.
But these is also one differences in our methods that make them very different, and is why they should never be compared.
Where I will calculate range based on usable battery capacity on a fixed test loop, where the car is driven at a set 120kph, Kyles test is very different. As a viewer, you can expect to get the range I get from 100-0% SOC. It is very simple and straight forward.
In Kyles test, he will drive the car from 100-1% at 70mph (112kph), but he will continue from 1% until the battery is almost dead at much lower speed. Most times below 60 or 50 mph, thus lowering the average speed even more. At the end, he reports the range. Though there is nothing wrong with this method of testing, he isn't actually measuring the range at 70mph is he? No.
This difference in testing method makes our tests basically impossible to compare, and that is why they shouldn't.
As I have commented a few times on this video. If we correct for traffic, speed, elevation and elevation changes we should expect the Polestar 3 LR DM to get around 432-441km on my normal test loop in Norway.
Hope this clears up why you cannot compare this test with Kyles tests.
Cheers!
Mate, thanks for clarification.
Great video and results! Btw, what card did you use in that video to charge the Polestar? Is that some specific only for this car? Can we get it somehow? )
Nice test. Like the car alot. When are you allowed to drop the Polestar 4 drive test?
July 1st!
@@KrisRifa Were the Polestar 4 reviews with the LR single motor? - seems to be the sweet spot both for the 3 and 4
A beautiful car but again a difficult comparison: at an average speed of only 100km/h, you can expect a longer range compared with the other tests at more than 110km/h…
Thank you.. Ordering it today......
Thank you for the interesting review of the Polestar 3. I want this car but also...
I want a Zaptec charger!
Great video Kris nice to see real world range and your reaction.
Oh and my mum would love a Zapotec charger she might then buy a Polestar!
Looking for the LRSM / SRSM Polestar 3 which may provide same/better range for a more affordable price tag. PS 3 look’s gorgeous except the front wing…
I want a Zaptec Go home charger.
I have been waiting for this video! Thanks Kris.
I want a Zaprex go home charger!
Thanks for the video!
This car looks great in black.
I want a zaptec charger. Great video!
I’ve got the same car in black too on order! Very excited and glad the range isn’t a myth
Wonder what the charge curve is like?
I want a Zaptec Go homecharger
Also looking forward to the Polestar 4 video! Perhaps ask why Midnight isn't available for the PS4?
I want a Zaptec Go home charger
Congratulation Polestar on ranking #1, yes
Not that impressed. I did consider getting a polestar 3, but it came out a bit to late for me. So I went with a BMW i5 40e on 19” wheels. On my last big trip I averaged 17,1 kWh/100km. So with an 81kWh useful battery I should manage to do 470km. (Conditions were ideal). I did drive the speed limits of 130/120/110/70/… on a trip from Antwerp to Paris and back. Hence my argument for choosing an normal car and not an SUV. Guess I won’t be far of an Audi Q6 e-tron. Yes, this is impressive, but I’d really like this in the next Volvo V90…
Agree. Considering in china, some of the suv of this size, like XPeng G9 or ZhiJi LS6 can easily go as low as 14kWh/ 100km in highway. This is too much consumption. I drove a Volvo EX30 across alpine last month and I can manage to do 16.7kWh/ 100km. This 20kWh/100km is unacceptable.
Welcome to Spain Kris. Thanks for this awesome video review of Polestar3. I want a Zaptec Go home charger.
Amazing news, good selling point for sure
I want a Zaptec GO homecharger
Nice video 👍
Nice result, even with the caveats.
How long did it stay at 200kw charge speed!?
I want a Zaptec Go home charger.. 👏🏼🤞🏼
"I want a Zaptec GO homecharger"
:D
I want a Zaptec go home charger, and I love this youtube chanel. Best regards Andreas Roger
Nice video!
and yes, I definitly want a zaptec go homecarger!
Polestar 3: temperature 21c, avg speed 100,5km/h, range 499km
Mercedes EQS: temperature -3c, avg speed 111,8km/h, range 422 km
Obviously Polestar 3 results are not the best among your tests.
Now I'm just wondering what that other car is you're not yet allowed to talk about. EX90 or PS4?😊
I want a zaptec go home charger. Awesome video 👍🏼
I want a Zaptec GO home charger.
…And a Polestar 3
The average speed on this range test was 63 mph? That's what I would call hyper-miling. I can get about 300 miles (483 kms) of range in my Model Y at that speed.
As I said in the video several times, that average speed included traffic at the end. Up until the last ten minutes, the test was done at 120kph. I have tested the Model Y at those speeds, at does not get anything close to that range.
The most I even got out of a Model Y LR was 346km, and that car was on tiny 18" wheels.
@@KrisRifa And I've tested my Model Y on a state highway I drive often, which means my average speed is closer to 65 mph, sometimes less... sometimes more. I have gotten 304 miles of range with my 2023 Model Y AWD more than once. edit; .... My recent drive from Evergreen, Co to Denver International Airport and back, 114 miles, 237 Wh/mile. With an estimated 79 kWh battery pack that = 333 miles (535 kms) of range. ... I have other examples.
@@777Outrigger sorry, you can claim whatever you want. But without actual evidence, it is all hearsay.
I can claim I got 400 miles out of a Polestar 3 earlier in the day. But without me having any evidence to back that claim up (like a video), why should anybody take my word for it? Nobody should, until there is evidence. I am not calling you a liar, but your claim without evidence means nothing.
I am quite explicit about the results in this video may not be directly comparable to my normal tests. So how can you be more confident than me?
@@KrisRifa My recent drive from Evergreen, Co to Denver International Airport and back, 114 miles, 237 Wh/mile. With an estimated 79 kWh battery pack that = 333 miles (535 kms) of range. 80% interstate, with a 15 minute slow moving traffic jam, but a significant part over 70 mph, sometimes briefly over 80 mph. Not a steady state test, but more realistic driving conditions. ... I have other examples.
@@777Outrigger and yet, no Model Y has gotten close to that in any of my tests that are documented here in the channel. There are millions of stories claiming this and that. But only tests are the measured and documented and are as close as possible so they can be compared are the ones that matter. This test was done at a steady 120kph (132/134km),where the last 2km was done at close to 10kph. That is why the average speed is 101,5kph. Sorry but I don’t care about your, or anybody’s anecdotes. In terms of comparisons, they mean nothing. Sorry, that’s just the way it is.
I want a Zaptec GO homecharger
So how many more miles did this do than the other car you're not allowed to talk about XCoughX PS4...?
I want to win a Zaptec Go home charger. Great video and what a great car!
I want Zaptec go homecharger 😊
Kris you are aware that the ex90 got the cooling seats cancelled? I have a reservation with deliver date end of october.
Starting to get pissed and thinking about going ev9 instead ...
I want a Zaptec Go home charger! ⚡🇳🇴🇸🇪
I want to win a Zaptec Go home charger. Useful (and nice to watch)... as usual. Thanks
I want a Zaptec GO home charger!
Not impressed! 550m elevation difference is a lot, it had ideal weather, average speed is lower compared to what you do in Norway.
When you will redo the test in Norway will be under Mercedes EQE as of range, where the Mercedes had 15km/h higher avg. speed, it was 10 degrees colder and it had a 18kWh smaller battery.
You cannot compare the base RWD EQE which is smaller, on tiny wheels and is a saloon vs the AWD large SUV which is the Polestar 3 on massive 22" wheels. The EQE is impressively efficient, and nobody is expecting a large SUV to beat it.
I want a zaptec go home charger!
I want a Zaptec GO home charger.
I want a Zaptec GO homecharger
I want a zeptec Go Homecharger
So, can I expect a range of 450 km and 400 km if the average speed is 110km/h and 120 km/h ?
Yeah, you'd wish, but actually not really, unless you're driving during the late spring time in sunny Spain. If the aforementioned conditions are met, you'll get around 450 km of range at 100 km/h at best from this car. Why?
Well, firstly, I think Chris drove the car preconditioned. So I suspect that he didn't start with scorching heat in the cabin, thus no cooling was required.
Then, the very long stretch of downhill he drove at the beginning was detrimental for the car's consumption. He did stated that the test might not be as accurate, as he could not do an A-B-A test.
But in general, the lack of linearity of the batteries' discharge rates make them look good for the SoC range that Chris was driving.
Remember that this close to a barn-sized truck on batteries (close to 2.6 t just the bare-metal, no fluids, nothing), with it's 0.29 cd.
An average speed of 120 km/h in real life means either driving realistically at a peak speed of around 130 km/h a highway or at a constant 125 km/h on a relative free highway.
And you just can't beat physics, as engineers and designers at Polestar might think.
The huge battery only proves my point, that the lack in research and development towards battery technology, only makes the car manufacturers to come up with a simple scale of the battery size, if the customer wants more range, just to make the car look good, disregarding everything else.
I think that, for an average of 120 km/h the consumption will be around at least 270 Wh/km to put it mildly, but overall closer to 310 Wh/km, taking into account that the ground was mostly flat, without your typical spikes in elevation changes that can be found in almost every corner of the world.
Curious what the charge curve looked like, how long did it stay at 200?
It will definitely outperform the Tesla Model S that only has an average curve of 131 compared to 150.
I Want a Zaptec Go Home Charger Thanks!!
Your avg speed was 90km/h, not 100km/h as you falsely put in your little table
It was not, you may want to watch the video before commenting. I do not take lightly being called a liar. This is you first and last warning as it is in violation of the commenting guidelines here.
Everyone is releasing their cars in spain. I guess it's because of the nice warm weather:)
Portugal or Maroc are other variants and especially to electric cars, they don’t want to see a winter consumption/charging session 😅
@@Manu-P8 Haha definitely:P
Not to take away from your excitement. This is likely the best way to get a consumption from any electric car. Good weather. Not too fast average speed. 500meter down hill on a shorter range test. Not that anything is wrong with that.
I want a Zaptec GO charger😊
I want a zaptek home charger 😊
I want a Zaptec Go home charger
This is not a big suv and the efficiency of this car is horrible. XPeng G9 can average about 15kWh/ 100km in 120kmh highway or traffic. G6 can even do lower 13kWh/ 100km. This Polestar 3 is doing 20kWh/ 100km, unbelievably inefficient.
This is bigger than G9, so your argument makes no sense. G9 cannot average 15kWh/100km at 120kph., that would be lower than the new Model 3. In Tesla Bjørn’s test it managed 26,6kWh/1000km at 120kph. Your claim is a lie.
After almost 80 range here this is the most efficient large SUV ever tested, but somehow it’s very inefficient? Yeah, Thant makes sense 🤣🙈
Really dont know what you are talking about. I am getting 390km easily in my 2023 M3 RWD
What are you on about? Comparing a small RWD sedan with a large AWD SUV? How does that make sense? And further more, your small RWD sedan gets 110km less than this large AWD SUV on 22" wheels. I mean, dude, what are smoking? 🤣🤣
@@KrisRifa LOL. Small? Are you drunk? It is literally 10cm smaller than PS3… 🤦🏻♂️. And range that is claimed for my M3 is 430km. And I am getting 400. So I am over 85% of claimed range. 🤦🏻♂️🤦🏻♂️🤡
@@oleg1981 Model 3 is 18cm shorter, and 15cm lower, so yes. Compared to the Polestar 3 it is a small car. Model 3 RWD is rated at 554km WLTP, so if you are getting 390km that is only 70,4% of the claimed range. Your claims are only hearsay, unless you can link a video documenting it. Either way, even you claims are either incorrect, inaccurate and not impressive. I've tested almost 80 evs in the past four years, all documented on the channel. So sorry matey, your hearsay ain't gonna fly here.
@@KrisRifa Don't know what you are bragging about. When i got the car the range o a website was 434km claimed. So i am getting almost what is claimed. and 390 km that i am saying is with about 5-6% left. I did not told that P3 is smaller. But M3 it is certainly not a small car. Wheel base is 10cm smaller... And actually wheel base what is matter the most...
@@oleg1981 554km on the Tesla website. It’s there for anybody to see. The rest is hearsay and means nothing. But sure, listen to an anonymous commenter online instead of the guy who has tested almost 80 cars on this channel, all documented and if that several Model Y. But sure, let’s just take your word for it 😅🙈🙈🤣
Wow thats good with 22’ wheels, so it would be even better with the 21’s wow. I’m hate didn’t come out on time
Interior with the screens is definitely inspired by the Mach-e
MPH, Miles, I'm not trying to figure out meters and kilometers . that means I have to pause every time you mention kilometers and meters
boohoo
I want to win a Zaptec Go home charger
and hope I can afford this car too 😂
oh and...
I want to win a Zaptec Go home charger 😀
I want to win a Zaptec go home charger ⚡️🔌
I want to win a Zaptec Go home charger
Hello.
I want to win a Zaptec Go home charger.
Lennart...
Polestar 3 is seriously overpriced for what it offers.
The cost of a fully optioned Polestar 3 in Australia is $179,460.00 drive away.
A fully optioned Tesla Model Y is $101,118.00. That's just the start of Polestars problems.
Polestar Australia has only one service centre to cover an area of 1,730,648 square Kms which is the state of Queensland.
Polestar has virtually zero resale value in comparison to established brands such as BMW, Mercedes, Porsche, and Tesla. Polestar opened with near no customer support. Its showroom is in an industrial building and orders are done online.
If you're prepared to pay 180k for Polaestar 3, We'll, good luck, my friends. This car at this price will fail. BTW, Polestar 4 will go the same way if Polestar don't get realistic with the pricing.
Is it, in what way? Or is it just to expensive for you and that makes you upset?!
Can’t se that it’s overpriced. Compared to their competitors it’s actually not that expensive.
Somebody doesn't understand what the word overpriced means 🤣
@@KrisRifa it’s for real pretty much the cheapest premium SUV on the market with similar specs and European.
@@gustavgyll3291 yeah I know! And it is freaking awesome! My review is up very soon! 🤩🤩
I want a Zaptec Go home charger.
I want a Zapotec Go home charger
I want a Zaptec Go homecharger
I want to win a Zaptec Go home charger
I want a Zaptec Go homecharger.
I want a Zaptec GO home charger.
I want a Zaptec GO homecharger
I want a Zaptec Go home charger
I want a Zaptec GO homecharger
I want a Zaptec Go home charger.
I want a Zaptec GO home charger
I want a zaptec go homecharger
I want a Zaptec Go home charger.
I want a Zaptec GO homecharger