The Media: "We are being Honest about that Killer Kyle: " Also the Media: "we will turn off the comment section on every video that proves we are lying"
Why dont you browse FOX post on incendiary topics. Comments are always off. You don't find that on left lean channels. You can prove this right now by searching their videos and looking. DO IT RIGHT NOW if you have a spec of doubt.
@@VibeinATLien Accidents like asking witnesses to change their written testimonies or withholding HD footage so they can instead submit an "AI enhanced" (AKA doctored) version of the low-definition footage? There's other things they've done too.
I think it goes back much further than during this trial. It goes back to the entire investigation. I would also imagine Rittenhouse could easily sue for malicious prosecution.
This is The most unjust prosecution and set of charges in recent history!! This young man was there to help and was attacked for it and then defended himself justly and properly!!!
@@susanmoriarty9900 Of course, they need to be held accountable for so much, but that accountability won't come I fear. The media has programmed so many people into insanity, it's sad to see. They are responsible for riots and chaos.
@@elsiemontgomery5866 he hasn’t though. The prosecution (Binger in particular) has used underhanded, dirty, unconstitutional tricks throughout this trial. He literally tried to claim that Kyle’s silence implied admission of guilt, which is an egregious breach of the constitution.
@@rtth4378 Exactly!! If anything, this should be an eye opener for people, because there are A LOT of prosecutors who are just like Binger. They care more about numbers & politics, rather than justice. Think about all the cases that get no media attention smh
why do you think the judge has openly dogged them out in front of the jury at times? That’s a judge’s way of hinting to a jury that something isn’t right.
SPEAKING OF CRIMINALS....Never allow democrats on your property....PERIOD....including the friends of your kids, unless you want to become a crime victim or get buried. DON`T LEARN THIS THE HARD WAY!
Was it exculpatory though? Seems like it isn’t even supposed to be used as evidence at all, according to the manufacturer. The whole trial is an insane politically motivated witch hunt and there should be a mistrial with prejudice.
Yeah I think they do things like that routinely and without consequence too it's just a game for the lawyers who can "win" regardless of right or wrong and the judge lets them play dirty.
This prosecutor is overstepping his boundaries to the third degree. At this point, he needs to be disbarred, jailed, and fined for his actions. Afterwards, Rittenhouse should file a lawsuit against the Prosecution, the legacy media, and the Brandon administration, for defamation of character! This trial is nothing short of a joke!
This is so illegal what the state has done here. It should be declared a mistrial with prejudice immediately. Withholding basic evidence clearly violates the defendants right to full discovery. If this was anyone else this would all be over.
U realize the state did a lot of the illegal things on purpose. They know they weren’t going to win the trial, so they purposely did illegal things so that the judge will declare a mistrial and have to do the entire thing over again
**Dismissed with prejudice** Mistrial with prejudice still leaves it open for appeal... to a higher (and in Wisconsin) more liberal court who will undoubtedly play to the liberal hive mind
If the defendant was black or otherwise non-white, the media and all of society would be in an uproar. Only white people don't enjoy the full protection of the law.
Absolutely. It was dumb but so were the people that attacked him and drew a gun (Gaige). Honestly the whole environment was ridiculous. That in mind I believe Kyle really can’t be that much in trouble legally.
If a mob of people where burning & looting a town near me and police weren't doing much to stop it , I'd be there to deter & help too.... If not Kyle, then who? Why does a 17yr old boy have to step up to do what grown men should've been doing? Better yet where was the National guard before?
@@angrypatriot2458 he doesn’t have to. It was stupid. An already dumb situation got even more elevated. That’s a fact because even gaige was also a moron. Going out in the middle of a riot with a rifle in America is simply asking for trouble. We can’t assume that we can count on him to make the right call, deescalate, and not accidentally shoot an innocent person in the face. Everyone that attacked him were also stupid. He had the right to protect himself and his own property but as far as I know it’s not legal to protect others with deadly force so I think the defense is trying to make it seem like that wasn’t the case. If he was at a friends or someone needed assistance I’m pretty sure that’s the exception. I think the fact he had to kill two people kind of proves this was dumb
@@Joesmho23 I see where you're coming from yet I don't fully agree with everything you're saying.. You're right it wasn't his responsibility to be there And yes , I see you're point as to making a bad situation worse. I'm sure there's millions of people that wouldn't have been there , yet , he was. He was there doing what the millions of people sitting at home should have done. I call that integrity, doing what's right even when no one it looking. Would it have made a difference if he went unarmed?? Yeah, Kyle would've been killed. Gun or no gun he went to help anyone he could. Personally I feel he showed remarkable resolve & control. He didn't just spray bullets , shot only the ones pursuing him to either kill him or to grave harm...
I hate to say it but it seems like there are two very basic strategies: PROSECTION: get a mistrial called (and then filing to retry the case with different prosecution staff) DEFENSE: get a mistrial called with prejudice (meaning the case cannot be tried again).
@@sunleo6161 ahhh I read into the original post "with prejudice". My apologies to original poster and thank you for pointing out that the post didn't include that language. An oversight on my part while thinking about a previous post.
Binger needs to be brought up on weapons charges for what he did with the AR. That was criminal. You cannot point a weapon at anyone and that though process is part of his argument against Kyle when Kyle pointed that same rifle at Rosenbaum.
@@kjjunior7918 while I understand your view, you're confusing two different issues. If I point a weapon at you, I can be brought up on charges. Binger is no different even if he was just doing it for dramatic effect. More importantly, Kyle killed two people and he didn't just do it. It was last year. Currently he is innocent until proven guilty. So it's not murder until that happens. I assume you have taken ample opportunity to learn all the facts about this incident. Am I correct? Please explain why you feel he murdered people.
The Judge should Declare MISTRAL with PREJUDICE after so many times of MISCONDUCT on behalf of the PROSECUTOR and the Jurors being Threatened and then the With Holding of Key Evidence No other Option
Is it better for Kyle to get a mistrial or better take his chances with the jury? Frankly I’m not sure. Personally my impression is it seems the jury is leaning to acquit Kyle but are holding off making a decision cause of potential riots
@@robosoldier11 it’s better if the jury finds him innocent…then Kyle is cleared and a truly free man… mistrial will put the blame on the court which will enrage the lefties and have more potential for chaos in the streets again… and has the general public left with the thought that he could still be “guilty”
Hahaha 🤣 he's guilty, the video is if the drone video of him pointing his gun, the video was email which compressed the video quality. They used a Dropbox to send it on Friday, the lower quality video was already showen and the defense said Kyle pointing his gun was the Duramax turn mirror.
Some people live such coddled and pampered lives, that they reach what should be adulthood, having never once been checked on their adorably child-like behavior.
The juniors should talk about it before delibeberation..hell no judge knows that and prosecution does to but yelled at him when he's defending the people right to have a killer locked up.
Anyone threatening violence or mayhem for an unjust verdict should be labeled and charged with domestic terrorism. "Enemies, both foreign and domestic,"
Question for the Antifa, Marxists and BLM supporters. If Rittenhouse was Black, and everything else was exactly the same, would you still be condemning him? Honest, direct answers.
If Kyle Rittenhouse was black he wouldn’t be having a court case he would be dead in Kenosha. Honest answer. Whether it’s appropriate to cross state lines with an AR-15 to defend other strangers property resulting in the death of two people…. no I would not support it and condemn them as well. I don’t believe the initial shooting was warranted and everything after was a result of shooting a man 4 times. By standers have no knowledge of what happened prior other than him shooting someone. Sad situation all the way around. I’ll return it to you though if Kyle rittenhouse was black would you defend him the same way? Honest, direct answer.
Yes, the justice system here in America is fast becoming a joke to many. This lack of justice by a justice system is much like the recent revelations by the DOJ, FBI, CIA, NSA and so many of our once treasured and trusted justice department and law enforcement agencies.
Judge needs to grow some balls. The prosicution has already broken CONSTITUTIONAL LAW 3 separate times in front of an entire jury. He should have thrown it out for bias/mistrial IMMEDIATLY
I believe he’s hoping it’s a full acquittal from the jury to make it a cleaner verdict. If he does it the media and public will have more ammunition to claim bias toward Kyle.
@@mr.k5407 In a court of law, yes. However, in the court of public opinion, a mistrial with prejudice will just mean the judge was biased towards the defense. We DO NOT want a mistrial OR a mistrial with prejudice. We want the jury to be allowed to do their job and hopefully they do their job correctly and Kyle receives a full legal acquittal.
One problem with this idea is that riots often spring from protests, and police efforts to distinguish between the two when making arrests have a poor track record.
The truth is that they are all a bunch of clowns and the one on trial is going to be haunted by the fact that he killed someone for the rest of his life.
This is an open and shut case of self-defense. If the jury doesn't return a verdict of not guilty on ALL counts, then we have moved into a period in our country where there is no such thing as justice and people will have no choice but to take the law and their own protection into their own hands.
Even though Kyle was found not guilty, the scenario you spelled out previously is still necessary and required of all freedom loving persons until this wave of madness is stopped and we may all return to a world that makes sense.
The entire prosecution team should lose their law licenses for clearly using political slant in their positions. I haven't watched all of the trial but have witnessed 2 speaking States attorneys acts of treasonous/unconstitutional accusations against the defendant In fact, one of the charges deprives the defendant of his right to protect himself. The judge should have thrown the 2 idiots out and forbidden them to enter his court again; unless they were the accused.
@@Roman_4x5 yeah... it's easy to see he was really on the verge of declaring mistrial. He put his trust in the jury though. Hard thing to do when you have legit reason to call for a mistrial with prejudice...
I'm still in shock that he picked up that gun, finger on the trigger & aimed it @ the jury, nobody said WTH are you doing? Especially after the Alec Baldwin fiasco murder!🤔
Who's betting Baldwin get's indicted? Not me, I believe he will never be charged with murdering the woman, and that's what he did. It's a left wing thing. Both Baldwin and the clown prosecutor have no idea how to handle a gun. Both should be charged.
@@JayJayKz You're probably right, Baldwin or the prosecutor won't be charged. You know, the two different systems of justice seems to always lean left.
@@jrami223 COUNT 4: FIRST-DEGREE INTENTIONAL HOMICIDE, USE OF A DANGEROUS WEAPON Judicial Council Note, 1988: First-degree intentional homicide is analogous to the prior offense of first-degree murder.
It's not unbelievable, these assholes will do anything to lock up a person that believes in "THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA". they all need to be ousted, don't know how these idiots got voted in, they hate white people and the "UNITED STATES". so not too unbelievable.
It probably happens more than we realize. The prosecutors only incentive is to win and that’s a flaw in our justice system. Both sides to win over finding the truth.
No, in this case it is perfectly believable. The prosecution received their marching orders long before the trial began. They thought all that would be necessary is to make perfunctory statements and smugly await the jury’s decision.
Exactly! Innocent until proven guilty. Defendant and prosecution are the correct terms. The word “victim” suggests you have proven the defendant guilty already. 6:06
This judge is what all judges should aspire to be. He keeps referring back to the “Founding Fathers” intentions… which incidentally were intentionally written to be easily interpreted by layman’s… The intentions of the Founding Fathers are the very foundation on which they constructed the greatest legal document of all times. The UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION. Thank you sir, for defending this and standing up for it under these trying times.
No mistrial. All charges dismissed without prejudice. Then this entire prosecution team should be disbarred and suffer the life long effects of public humility and shame. In prison.
Dismissed *with prejudice. That means that the prosecution is not allowed to retry the same charges. “Without prejudice” allows the prosecution to retry the case.
There wasn't any evidence withheld.. its a bunch of old people that don't know how technology works. The issue was a compressed file had diffrent levels of quality between the defense and prosecutors and no one knew until the day prior to trial... the title is framed for the algorithm and designed for sensationalism
The video evidence should be seen in real time. Binger showing slow motion and freeze frame video makes it seem like Kyle had a couple weeks to react. In reality he had precious few seconds in a life or death situation to react.
Hopefully someone on this jury has a backbone. The judge should declare a mistrial if the sheriff can't keep the rioters from trying to influence the jury.
Really, I'm sure we will see, pro rittenhouse protesters when justice is served, what your saying makes no sense the far right are the only ones who have thrown out Death threats, use their cars as a deadly weapon . Punks in trucks shooting paintballs at people, I can go on and on. You all are the true thugs
This is a good move by the defense. The jury has been out WAAAAAY to long to feel comfortable with an acquittal. Imho they were gonna hold this card in case of a quick conviction as it would play great in appeal court or wait until we got to this point in deliberating to make the play for a mistrial, hopefully with prejudice. Now from and America citizen standpoint.... a mistrial, even with prejudice, is not enough to feel comfortable in the 2nd ammendment and right to self defense. Not guilty please
the evidence that is so call withholding is a a drone shot video released by Fox that has a higher resolution that the copy submitted to the court showing Kyle have all the empty space he could escape, but decide to loop back to the dangerous scene. Of course the defendant would like to dismiss the evidence.
Thank you, Your Honor. It is against the law to label someone in a manner to plant an idea. It is the plaintiff, witness, defendant, counsel, juror, bailiff, Judge.
It's these kinds of details I think the public learns from when the case it televised. Because the media had a field day with the judge not labeling the rioters as victims. The media gave *their reason* for it, but after hearing the judge explain his rationale, we understand why. Our media is awful.
Kyle is fortunate to have a judge that was dedicated to a fair trial and not trying to pander to a political agenda. The judge recognized and called out the efforts to discredit him and the process. There was a lot of pressure on the judge and he resisted it. Same way now with the Supreme Court. Takes a lot of guts!
The prosecution isn’t making mistakes, they are actively trying to put a finger on the scales. The rule of law & the truth are not on the prosecutions agenda.
That head motion the other day by flufferboy Binger when the judge talked about this not being a political trial told me all I needed to know about the prosecution. This is a political witch hunt nothing less will satiate the bloodlust of the Mob except a prosecution.
Welcome to the first rule of what a lawyer is and does. It has zero to do with morals, to the contrary, many lawyers laugh at morals as being antiquated notions that have no place in jurisprudence.
The people causing all the problems are the same people Rittenhouse took care of when defending himself. Lol, the irony. Threaten someone’s life and they should always be able to defend themselves.
@@ACTHdan Sure. Death threats to the judge, lawyers out there, and intimidating the jury to attempt to sway the outcome of the trial. They are equal to the people rioting in the streets, burning businesses down, hurting people, attacking the police. You know…. People causing the problems. Pretty define
One more dirty trick. How has he not been in contempt of court is beyond me. Someone the prosecutor's are charged with official misconduct. It's so obvious!
@Lone wolf I'm so sorry that your education system failed to teach you basic court rights. I'm not in America and this is basic to not bring evidence without stating it pre-trial, to not interrupt the judge, to not breach Right to Remain Silent, and importantly, misuse Public Tax for Kangaroo Court. Last time they jailed a grandma for stealing sandals (A single damn pair of sandals worth $2), the court got destroyed.
Shouldn’t this be a mistrial with prejudice already???? Mr. Rittenhouse should be found not guilty but the deliberations is taking to long…a not guilty verdict which should have come out shouldn’t take this long….the corrupt prosecutor threw in extra charges which are lower level crimes but the prosecutor is reaching high….
That’s not true. The fact that it’s taking so long I feel is a good thing. The George Floyd decision came quick and it was guilty. There are probably a few that think he is guilty and ones that think he is innocent. They have to convince each other.
@@j.h.3927 Chauvin was most certainly guilty of second-degree murder. Rittenhouse is not guilty of the crimes charged, but some on the jury likely believe he should be guilty of something and are holding out.
We don't care if people are rioting and burning your neighborhood, we don't care if they are armed, we don't care if they're the worst possible kind of people, we don't care if they attack you first; you are never allowed to defend yourself and if you do... this is what will happen.
When I watch some of those people out in front of The Pourhouse it amazes me. It doesn't take much for the public to become animals. The BLM movement is there to see what trouble they can make for everyone in Kenosha
Got an example? He prevented the defense from showing a video of Kyle days before the kenosha talking about how he wanted to shoot looters which could have been pretty damning.
He would have been in that position anyways. He went there to protect his father's house from a fire. And because he was armed with a deadly weapon he thought he could intimidate people so he went around playing the Vigilante trying to protect other people's property. Riots are what they are people are going to destroy things in riots he had no business defending people's property that's covered under insurance. The Engage The Mob and then they chase them and now he's claiming self-defense he started it. He might be a serial killer he's 18 and handling a gun and now he's claiming self-defense. He's guilty clearly.
If “Kyle” hadn’t been an underage kid traveling with a weapon to a riot and shooting 3 people he wouldn’t be in this position as well. Three people would be alive and well today if he’d just stayed home with his mother.
Innocent with Prejudice against the Prosecution. The Prosecution is working hard for a mistrial so they can retrial Rittenhouse. Shame on the Prosecution.
How the hell is this still going on. Wisconsin state law states that self defense only has to be somewhat proven. He proved fully that it was self defense
@@DenofDragons Spineless fools. Do they really think that giving in to terrorists will keep them safe? All that does is embolden those people to do MORE jury intimidation in the future.
A youth's life here is at stake. Adults are playing with words like children. In my opinion this case just goes to show the justice system has become a joke and nobody is really interested in the youth.
"How would you like to be put on trial for a crime and the judge introduced the case to the jury by introducing you as the defendant and the person who is accusing you as the victim?" The State is accusing Rittenhouse.
@@thedevilsadvocate5210 You are innocent until proven guilty. I he is guilty of murder is the question here in court right now. As long as he hasn't been convicted it is wrong to declare the accuser as a victim.
Ummm, because he killed and injured people, maybe? He illegally drove to Wisconsin, picked up his illegally obtained firearm and illegally carried it into a situation that didn't concern him. I'm thinking that the little piece of work should be held accountable and that scene of crocodile tears was the worst I've ever seen.
@@anitavisram8346 3 people who were trying to inflict bodily harm to the defendant within all the chaos. I suppose he should have let the first one take his weapon, let the second continue to beat him with the skateboard and let the third shoot him? He tried to run and remove himself from the situation, they just didn't let him.
@Lone wolf Not a vigilante. Dude was armed, but so were plenty of rioters-were they all vigilantes? He didn’t fire his weapon to act out vigilante justice but to defend himself when he was on the ground being charged at by multiple ppl-that’s allowed. Really stupid kid for showing up at the riot at all, particularly with an AR. But not a vigilante in the final analysis. That’s why the prosecution is having so much trouble
@@susanlindsay7970 .any body that believes the jury don't watch the news etc. ,and discuss it with their families are naive! Hopefully they're more persuaded to acquit him.
So, the defense brings up a legitimate point, or two, the judge asks the prosecutor if it's true. The prosecutor prevaricates and the judge moves on to media lies?! Something's not right.
Yeah your right why didn’t he get a answer to that question about instructions stating should not be used in a court of law , and why did you the state not provide the defense with the same video the state had and with holding it for weeks what a bunch of crap
Becouse left making it like some white supremacy guy went to kenosha kill black peoples?but for some strange reason all peoples involved in this case are white..
Context matters. In this case, the prosecutor was making a prosecutorial point, and while some in the jury may in fact have felt "threatened", I don't think any trial would come to the conclusion that the juror had reason to actually feel threatened given the context of the courtroom and it being part of closing arguments. Of course this obviates the point, how did the juror even have a gun in the courtroom to begin with?
Criminal conduct by the prosecution. Kyle must be acquitted at this point, regardless of where the jury is in deliberations, and a mistrial to follow suit. Do the right thing, Judge. This should have been dismissed with prejudice a long time ago.
This judge is starting to worry me. Im starting to get the feeling that he is too worried about how he will be viewed in the court of public opinion and its starting to effect his decision making. He is letting the Prosecutors jump through loop hole after loop hole to win their case. He should have already ended this trial with a mistrial, but he wants it to keep going so he can keep talking about himself on TV. Wouldnt doubt if he's angling for a TV judge show.
"Prosecutors jump through loop hole after loop hole to win their case" Most people opnions is "not guilty", why then you think he would be on prosecutor side with that reasoning?
The Media: "We are being Honest about that Killer Kyle: " Also the Media: "we will turn off the comment section on every video that proves we are lying"
Media lies all the damn time and I’m glad you are aware of that. Time to spread the word to masses of zombies that are not aware.
Fox is the media
cnn especially. That fkin news outlet is propaganda biased b.s. all the way.
The Media needs to be held accountable for the misinformation and lies they have been spewing for years now!!!!
Why dont you browse FOX post on incendiary topics. Comments are always off. You don't find that on left lean channels. You can prove this right now by searching their videos and looking. DO IT RIGHT NOW if you have a spec of doubt.
We are way beyond prosecutorial mistakes, and well into criminal malice, with forethought.
Na not really accidents happen and nothing can be proven to be intentional
@@VibeinATLien
Accidents like asking witnesses to change their written testimonies or withholding HD footage so they can instead submit an "AI enhanced" (AKA doctored) version of the low-definition footage? There's other things they've done too.
@@augustday9483 none of that was true, if it was doctored footage they wouldn't admit it as evidence, no body changed there statement
I think it goes back much further than during this trial. It goes back to the entire investigation.
I would also imagine Rittenhouse could easily sue for malicious prosecution.
@@VibeinATLien It was admitted upon objection by the defense, and never ruled on.
This is The most unjust prosecution and set of charges in recent history!! This young man was there to help and was attacked for it and then defended himself justly and properly!!!
The judge is doing everything he can to avoid mistrial because of the sheer headache of that and he knows its gonna be a not guilty verdict.
That's sort of how I'm leaning as well. I think he knows what's coming but God what if he's wrong?
I'm beginning to feel that he'll be found guilty.And that is totally BS!!!
@@juliefabio if the jury ends up being hung he can still declare a mistrial with prejudice
@@juliefabio If he is found guilty, im confident appellate court will throw it out
The longer the jury is out the less likely a not guilty verdict.
The prosecution is a joke and should be held accountable for their misconduct.
Like pointing a gun with finger on trigger at the jury?
The Media needs to be held accountable as well!
Dismissed or mistrial with prejudice.
@@susanmoriarty9900 Of course, they need to be held accountable for so much, but that accountability won't come I fear. The media has programmed so many people into insanity, it's sad to see. They are responsible for riots and chaos.
@Pig exterminator Kind of like how you will be after the upcoming mid-term election.
This is unbelievably mishandled. The prosecution should be prosecuted.
The JUDGE should be prosecuted for the prejudicial way he has favored Rittenhouse and the Defense. The judge is a disgrace!
Amen
@@elsiemontgomery5866 he hasn’t though. The prosecution (Binger in particular) has used underhanded, dirty, unconstitutional tricks throughout this trial. He literally tried to claim that Kyle’s silence implied admission of guilt, which is an egregious breach of the constitution.
The Prosecution should Positively be Perfectly and Permanently Prosecuted and Prostituted.
@@elsiemontgomery5866 how the hell do you figure the judge should be prosecuted??
The prosecution team needs to be held accountable & punished. They've been willingly abusing the system during this entire trial.
Right
They are part of the protected class.
@@rtth4378 Exactly!! If anything, this should be an eye opener for people, because there are A LOT of prosecutors who are just like Binger. They care more about numbers & politics, rather than justice. Think about all the cases that get no media attention smh
Spoken like a true Kkk MAGA
why do you think the judge has openly dogged them out in front of the jury at times? That’s a judge’s way of hinting to a jury that something isn’t right.
This is so far outside "mistakes." This is literally criminal by the prosecution.
It’s gonna be fine, Kyle picked his Jurors and the judge.
And they got caught, they meant to withhold the evidence.
@Harry V how so?
SPEAKING OF CRIMINALS....Never allow democrats on your property....PERIOD....including the friends of your kids, unless you want to become a crime victim or get buried. DON`T LEARN THIS THE HARD WAY!
From a neutral perspective, he did what he did, that is all
They gave the defense low quality video feed on purpose.
This is mistrial with prejudice.
The prosecution intentionally withheld exculpatory evidence. This is a train wreck of a mistrial!
Was it exculpatory though? Seems like it isn’t even supposed to be used as evidence at all, according to the manufacturer. The whole trial is an insane politically motivated witch hunt and there should be a mistrial with prejudice.
Mistrial with prejudice
I don't want a mistrial if it's a mistrial he will be found guilty
Yeah I think they do things like that routinely and without consequence too it's just a game for the lawyers who can "win" regardless of right or wrong and the judge lets them play dirty.
This prosecutor is overstepping his boundaries to the third degree. At this point, he needs to be disbarred, jailed, and fined for his actions. Afterwards, Rittenhouse should file a lawsuit against the Prosecution, the legacy media, and the Brandon administration, for defamation of character! This trial is nothing short of a joke!
This is so illegal what the state has done here. It should be declared a mistrial with prejudice immediately. Withholding basic evidence clearly violates the defendants right to full discovery. If this was anyone else this would all be over.
U realize the state did a lot of the illegal things on purpose. They know they weren’t going to win the trial, so they purposely did illegal things so that the judge will declare a mistrial and have to do the entire thing over again
**Dismissed with prejudice**
Mistrial with prejudice still leaves it open for appeal... to a higher (and in Wisconsin) more liberal court who will undoubtedly play to the liberal hive mind
I'm sure at this point Kyle wishes he was black.
If the defendant was black or otherwise non-white, the media and all of society would be in an uproar. Only white people don't enjoy the full protection of the law.
@@inurmomsbedroom123 already mentioned that mate lol. No need to explain it, most people following this case aren't mentally incapable
The kid shouldn't have been there but the simple fact is he was and had every right to defend himself.
Neither should hundreds of others
Absolutely. It was dumb but so were the people that attacked him and drew a gun (Gaige). Honestly the whole environment was ridiculous. That in mind I believe Kyle really can’t be that much in trouble legally.
If a mob of people where burning & looting a town near me and police weren't doing much to stop it , I'd be there to deter & help too....
If not Kyle, then who?
Why does a 17yr old boy have to step up to do what grown men should've been doing? Better yet where was the National guard before?
@@angrypatriot2458 he doesn’t have to. It was stupid. An already dumb situation got even more elevated. That’s a fact because even gaige was also a moron. Going out in the middle of a riot with a rifle in America is simply asking for trouble. We can’t assume that we can count on him to make the right call, deescalate, and not accidentally shoot an innocent person in the face. Everyone that attacked him were also stupid. He had the right to protect himself and his own property but as far as I know it’s not legal to protect others with deadly force so I think the defense is trying to make it seem like that wasn’t the case. If he was at a friends or someone needed assistance I’m pretty sure that’s the exception. I think the fact he had to kill two people kind of proves this was dumb
@@Joesmho23 I see where you're coming from yet I don't fully agree with everything you're saying..
You're right it wasn't his responsibility to be there And yes , I see you're point as to making a bad situation worse. I'm sure there's millions of people that wouldn't have been there , yet , he was. He was there doing what the millions of people sitting at home should have done. I call that integrity, doing what's right even when no one it looking.
Would it have made a difference if he went unarmed?? Yeah, Kyle would've been killed. Gun or no gun he went to help anyone he could.
Personally I feel he showed remarkable resolve & control. He didn't just spray bullets , shot only the ones pursuing him to either kill him or to grave harm...
This is outrageous! This trial is a joke! He should declare a mistrial immediately! Binger should be charged with perjury and trial misconduct! 🤬
Mistrial ..with prejudice...meaning Kyle could never be charged again
AND TAPERING WITH EVIDENCE
And attempting to manipulate witness statements (which a witness as attested to on the stand).
Bungee should comment on how he likes his property being burned!
@@n0madtv ABSOLUTELY
Curious if the bar could review this prosecutor's conduct.
Bidens henchmen will never get any pain.
Yes indeed. Anyone can make the complaint against him.
The bar is run by the Queen of England.
@@warmsunnytoday4535 since when?
@Lone wolf What an intelligent statement.
I hate to say it but it seems like there are two very basic strategies:
PROSECTION: get a mistrial called (and then filing to retry the case with different prosecution staff)
DEFENSE: get a mistrial called with prejudice (meaning the case cannot be tried again).
@@rickjackson3631 mistrial = retried. mistrial with prejudice = basically double jeopardy.
@@sunleo6161 ahhh I read into the original post "with prejudice". My apologies to original poster and thank you for pointing out that the post didn't include that language. An oversight on my part while thinking about a previous post.
@@rickjackson3631 thank u for being nice lol
@@rickjackson3631 that Biden diploma really shows
@@GlitchedPepsi Biden owned a bankrupt University? I think you're expressing some more delusional conclusions commonly associated with TrumpQins
Binger needs to be brought up on weapons charges for what he did with the AR. That was criminal. You cannot point a weapon at anyone and that though process is part of his argument against Kyle when Kyle pointed that same rifle at Rosenbaum.
Said the same thing.Should have been escorted out of the courtroom in handcuffs.
@@kjjunior7918 You can’t murder someone if you don’t point the weapon in the first place.
@@kjjunior7918 Interesting take... since even the HD video shows Baum-Baum trying to Bam-Bam Kyle right before he was shot.
@@uuasnyder poor Kyle can't fight. Cowards go to guns first
@@kjjunior7918 while I understand your view, you're confusing two different issues. If I point a weapon at you, I can be brought up on charges. Binger is no different even if he was just doing it for dramatic effect. More importantly, Kyle killed two people and he didn't just do it. It was last year. Currently he is innocent until proven guilty. So it's not murder until that happens. I assume you have taken ample opportunity to learn all the facts about this incident. Am I correct? Please explain why you feel he murdered people.
The Judge should Declare MISTRAL with PREJUDICE after so many times of MISCONDUCT on behalf of the PROSECUTOR and the Jurors being Threatened and then the With Holding of Key Evidence No other Option
The prosecutor wants a mistral it looks better than the Fat L he's going to take when Kyle walks
Is it better for Kyle to get a mistrial or better take his chances with the jury? Frankly I’m not sure. Personally my impression is it seems the jury is leaning to acquit Kyle but are holding off making a decision cause of potential riots
I agree If the jury cant answer let be judge answer the mistrial ,,,
No dismiss without prejudice so that we can try him again
@@robosoldier11 it’s better if the jury finds him innocent…then Kyle is cleared and a truly free man… mistrial will put the blame on the court which will enrage the lefties and have more potential for chaos in the streets again… and has the general public left with the thought that he could still be “guilty”
This needs to be declared as a mistrial WITH prejudice, NOW!
Hahaha 🤣 he's guilty, the video is if the drone video of him pointing his gun, the video was email which compressed the video quality.
They used a Dropbox to send it on Friday, the lower quality video was already showen and the defense said Kyle pointing his gun was the Duramax turn mirror.
@@marioalvarezvilla2464 bruh what
State reps need to be accused of case tainted from start
Yeap
Binger needs to be prosecuted immediately.
This is in criminal malice. There MUST be repercussions.
Must there be?
@ok Using the exact same justice system you see here? I'd almost welcome widespread chaotic lawlessness. It's not going to get any better.
@ok or..they could go to the state Capitol and try to hang the lieutenant governor?
Don't ever chase someone who is armed with a rifle.....I mean, I figured that to be pretty self explanatory.
But good guy with guy, in this case skateboard, feet n gun
Some people live such coddled and pampered lives, that they reach what should be adulthood, having never once been checked on their adorably child-like behavior.
Unless it's a plane hijacker
Rittenhouse aimed a rifle at him, what was he suppose to do? Cower behind the car in the fetal position?
😆 🤣 😂
This case is suffering from poisoned fruit, dismiss the charges with prejudice, NOW!
@Lucifer Morningstar yeah I know us blacks get all the breaks with the justice system, just like the afluenza case .
You don't understand what is poison fruit.
@@Asidebar... poison fruit refers to any evidence that comes from tainted evidence...i.e. the video that was retouched.
The juniors should talk about it before delibeberation..hell no judge knows that and prosecution does to but yelled at him when he's defending the people right to have a killer locked up.
You treated them like crap and they weren't given all the info. Judge lies about hour heroes are taught
Prosecutor needs to be arrested himself.
He needs his law license revoked permanently. He can go work at 7-11
Prosecutors and judges have total immunity.
Kyle defended himself pedi was running after him with a gun, I believe crazy looking ass
@@Gerthmagic There is this guy named Nifong, works at a 7-11 now, who would disagree with you on that one.
@@Brownie-tg3nu pretty sure he would fail at that as well
Anyone threatening violence or mayhem for an unjust verdict should be labeled and charged with domestic terrorism.
"Enemies, both foreign and domestic,"
Question for the Antifa, Marxists and BLM supporters. If Rittenhouse was Black, and everything else was exactly the same, would you still be condemning him?
Honest, direct answers.
You already know the answer...
That's a rhetorical question, right?
Hell no! BLM first thought that the dead were black and when they weren't, BLM had to hold their ground so not to lose face.
They are the real racists
If Kyle Rittenhouse was black he wouldn’t be having a court case he would be dead in Kenosha. Honest answer.
Whether it’s appropriate to cross state lines with an AR-15 to defend other strangers property resulting in the death of two people…. no I would not support it and condemn them as well.
I don’t believe the initial shooting was warranted and everything after was a result of shooting a man 4 times. By standers have no knowledge of what happened prior other than him shooting someone.
Sad situation all the way around.
I’ll return it to you though if Kyle rittenhouse was black would you defend him the same way? Honest, direct answer.
Prosecution has no case.....they proved it was self defense lol
Well spoken judge. You can not have a victim until it is proven that said individual was victimized.
Wow the Justice system has lost all sense of COMMON SENSE !
That’s not how that works ma’am
Yes, the justice system here in America is fast becoming a joke to many. This lack of justice by a justice system is much like the recent revelations by the DOJ, FBI, CIA, NSA and so many of our once treasured and trusted justice department and law enforcement agencies.
Never had it, never will.
Judge needs to grow some balls. The prosicution has already broken CONSTITUTIONAL LAW 3 separate times in front of an entire jury. He should have thrown it out for bias/mistrial IMMEDIATLY
They WANT a mistrial. A mistrial means it's not a not guilty or guilty, which they would rather have than an actual not guilty verdict
I believe he’s hoping it’s a full acquittal from the jury to make it a cleaner verdict. If he does it the media and public will have more ammunition to claim bias toward Kyle.
Judge wants trial OVER.
@@isaned but if it's a mistrial with prejudice doesn't that mean they can't retry him and it's over
@@mr.k5407 In a court of law, yes. However, in the court of public opinion, a mistrial with prejudice will just mean the judge was biased towards the defense. We DO NOT want a mistrial OR a mistrial with prejudice. We want the jury to be allowed to do their job and hopefully they do their job correctly and Kyle receives a full legal acquittal.
Everyone arrested in the upcoming riot should have added charges of jury intimidation and trying to influence a judge
One problem with this idea is that riots often spring from protests, and police efforts to distinguish between the two when making arrests have a poor track record.
@@scottyrye i hear you, but anyone smashing anything can be a good target
you know as much as i do in riots no ones arrested unless its a young white person.
We are praying for this whole situation and for God to protect the truth in this.
God will do his justice. Thou shall not kill
@@beautyan5309 It is thou shalt not murder. Killing is done for good reasons like in war and for self defense.
The truth is that they are all a bunch of clowns and the one on trial is going to be haunted by the fact that he killed someone for the rest of his life.
@@joelbrooks3198 strange self-defence when underage, stealing firearms and crossing state lines to pick fights with fellow knuckleheads.
@@Ad-Lo Those are not true. He didn't pick any fight. They attacked him. He was legal to have the weapon.
Let this poor kid go home to begin to salvage his smashed life.
Right!he's gonna be super rich soon don't worry.. sueing and book deals ect.
Hoping he’ll link up with nick sandmann from Covington catholic and get some tips on suing the media for $250M
He will never know peace unless he changes his face and name (new identity) even then, risks exposure throughout life
@@milehigh3054 needs to sue certain people including Brandon for calling him a White Supremacist.
@@onelovexx23 From who? A bunch of cowering frickin liberals, I don’t think that he is scared of them, he wasn’t in Kenosha.
This is an open and shut case of self-defense. If the jury doesn't return a verdict of not guilty on ALL counts, then we have moved into a period in our country where there is no such thing as justice and people will have no choice but to take the law and their own protection into their own hands.
Even though Kyle was found not guilty, the scenario you spelled out previously is still necessary and required of all freedom loving persons until this wave of madness is stopped and we may all return to a world that makes sense.
@@marthakrumboltz2710 2 tier justice system!
The entire prosecution team should lose their law licenses for clearly using political slant in their positions. I haven't watched all of the trial but have witnessed 2 speaking States attorneys acts of treasonous/unconstitutional accusations against the defendant In fact, one of the charges deprives the defendant of his right to protect himself. The judge should have thrown the 2 idiots out and forbidden them to enter his court again; unless they were the accused.
@Lone wolf and YOU are....? 🤨
He shouldn't have had that gun first if older maybe.
I don't blaimbthe jury I blame the judge cus he prohibited to much and the Nra lawyers bought off the judge...and that happens
This judge is a wonderful human being.
@@Roman_4x5 yeah... it's easy to see he was really on the verge of declaring mistrial. He put his trust in the jury though. Hard thing to do when you have legit reason to call for a mistrial with prejudice...
I'm still in shock that he picked up that gun, finger on the trigger & aimed it @ the jury, nobody said WTH are you doing? Especially after the Alec Baldwin fiasco murder!🤔
@@baqaqipekhebi7148 doesn’t matter, humans make mistakes. Never point a firearm at something you don’t intend on shooting
Who's betting Baldwin get's indicted? Not me, I believe he will never be charged with murdering the woman, and that's what he did. It's a left wing thing. Both Baldwin and the clown prosecutor have no idea how to handle a gun. Both should be charged.
@@proudconservative1 nah
@@JayJayKz You're probably right, Baldwin or the prosecutor won't be charged. You know, the two different systems of justice seems to always lean left.
@@proudconservative1 Respect due process, otherwise you’re just like the rest of em
There's no way 12 people will find him guilty of first degree murder.
Of course not dummy that's not one of the charges lmfao
I think he'll be found guilty of lessers.And that is BS!!!
@@jrami223 COUNT 4: FIRST-DEGREE INTENTIONAL HOMICIDE, USE OF A DANGEROUS WEAPON
Judicial Council Note, 1988: First-degree intentional homicide is analogous to the prior offense of first-degree murder.
That's what I'm saying but a hung jury isn't really ideal. It opens the door for retrial and possible federal charges ..
They better not cuz they r x
This is a case tainted by the prosecutors!! It's unbelievable
It's not unbelievable, these assholes will do anything to lock up a person that believes in "THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA". they all need to be ousted, don't know how these idiots got voted in, they hate white people and the "UNITED STATES". so not too unbelievable.
They never had a case to begin with. It was obviously self defense
It probably happens more than we realize. The prosecutors only incentive is to win and that’s a flaw in our justice system. Both sides to win over finding the truth.
@@marknunya5128 the 2 prosecutors work for the ADL.
Look up how and why the ADL was founded.
Then look up the last name rosenbaum.
No, in this case it is perfectly believable. The prosecution received their marching orders long before the trial began. They thought all that would be necessary is to make perfunctory statements and smugly await the jury’s decision.
Exactly! Innocent until proven guilty. Defendant and prosecution are the correct terms. The word “victim” suggests you have proven the defendant guilty already. 6:06
This judge is what all judges should aspire to be. He keeps referring back to the “Founding Fathers” intentions… which incidentally were intentionally written to be easily interpreted by layman’s… The intentions of the Founding Fathers are the very foundation on which they constructed the greatest legal document of all times. The UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION. Thank you sir, for defending this and standing up for it under these trying times.
I agree.
That is right Sir
🤮
neither you nor the judge know the intentions of those old dead guys.
@@rivergirl3444 mad much ?
No mistrial. All charges dismissed without prejudice. Then this entire prosecution team should be disbarred and suffer the life long effects of public humility and shame. In prison.
Dismissed *with prejudice. That means that the prosecution is not allowed to retry the same charges. “Without prejudice” allows the prosecution to retry the case.
You’re so right!! Best suggestion yet!!
If there was withheld evidence, then the prosecution is in very deep trouble.
No, they aren’t. They will never be held accountable. Unfortunately.
There wasn't any evidence withheld.. its a bunch of old people that don't know how technology works. The issue was a compressed file had diffrent levels of quality between the defense and prosecutors and no one knew until the day prior to trial... the title is framed for the algorithm and designed for sensationalism
The video evidence should be seen in real time. Binger showing slow motion and freeze frame video makes it seem like Kyle had a couple weeks to react. In reality he had precious few seconds in a life or death situation to react.
Videos are often shown in slow time for jury
@@Asidebar l'm sure they are but my point is what little time it actually took for this all occur.
Hopefully someone on this jury has a backbone. The judge should declare a mistrial if the sheriff can't keep the rioters from trying to influence the jury.
Theres no rioters stop being such a buffoon. Its white guys he killed nobody is rioting.
Really, I'm sure we will see, pro rittenhouse protesters when justice is served, what your saying makes no sense the far right are the only ones who have thrown out Death threats, use their cars as a deadly weapon . Punks in trucks shooting paintballs at people, I can go on and on. You all are the true thugs
They have been outside the court house all night many videos all over of them out there
@@elisamartinelli7676 leftists looted burned down buildings and killed people during their "summer of love" in 2020 stop watching fake news
What rioters? The ones from last year or is there a little uprising somewhere?
Malicious Prosecution. Willful and deliberately misleading. Let's go Brandon
LET'S GO BANNON!
To pull a strap out and point it at the jury , I have never seen anything so idiotic
Always never keep keep know….
With his nose picker on the trigger no less!!!!
@@shootpse88 🤥🤮 he's outrageous.
He clearly doesn’t own a gun, nor has he ever had any firearms training,
@@SteviePaints trained with Alec Baldwin
This is a good move by the defense. The jury has been out WAAAAAY to long to feel comfortable with an acquittal. Imho they were gonna hold this card in case of a quick conviction as it would play great in appeal court or wait until we got to this point in deliberating to make the play for a mistrial, hopefully with prejudice.
Now from and America citizen standpoint.... a mistrial, even with prejudice, is not enough to feel comfortable in the 2nd ammendment and right to self defense. Not guilty please
If the prosecution is with holding any evidence sounds like a case dismissed from the judge is the best decision
The oversight must be material. Perhaps we should contact Kamala Harris on that. She was notorious for it.
the evidence that is so call withholding is a a drone shot video released by Fox that has a higher resolution that the copy submitted to the court showing Kyle have all the empty space he could escape, but decide to loop back to the dangerous scene. Of course the defendant would like to dismiss the evidence.
you hicks would love that wouldnt you??
Thank you, Your Honor. It is against the law to label someone in a manner to plant an idea. It is the plaintiff, witness, defendant, counsel, juror, bailiff, Judge.
It's these kinds of details I think the public learns from when the case it televised. Because the media had a field day with the judge not labeling the rioters as victims. The media gave *their reason* for it, but after hearing the judge explain his rationale, we understand why. Our media is awful.
Not guilty
I just want this case over with I'm scared if they have a mistrial he might be guilty if they we trial they putting this family thur hell
Victim
@@thedevilsadvocate5210 troll
Sounds like to me the goal of the prosecutor was attempting a mistrial from the moment Thier star witness blew it
Kyle is fortunate to have a judge that was dedicated to a fair trial and not trying to pander to a political agenda. The judge recognized and called out the efforts to discredit him and the process. There was a lot of pressure on the judge and he resisted it. Same way now with the Supreme Court. Takes a lot of guts!
lol if prosecutors do this to a big case like this, imagine how they’re in smaller cases.
FAILURE of GOVERNOR and MAYOR BROUGHT ABOUT THIS WHOLE SITUATION FOR THIS YOUNG MAN!! THEY SHOULD BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE!!
Good luck
The prosecution isn’t making mistakes, they are actively trying to put a finger on the scales. The rule of law & the truth are not on the prosecutions agenda.
That head motion the other day by flufferboy Binger when the judge talked about this not being a political trial told me all I needed to know about the prosecution. This is a political witch hunt nothing less will satiate the bloodlust of the Mob except a prosecution.
No, it's just you have an enormous bias and it's leading you toward a conclusion regardless of what's presented.
Welcome to the first rule of what a lawyer is and does. It has zero to do with morals, to the contrary, many lawyers laugh at morals as being antiquated notions that have no place in jurisprudence.
@@superduperjew Ah so Mr. Objective please do tell us how this trial should play out I am truly curious.
Lock up the prosecutors they done lied and tried they binger needs to be charged for pointing a gun at the jury
HAHAHA "They done lied" Nice Early Cuyler impression. Looks like you are gulping those talking points down bud.
I was watching and knew he did it for a photo op for the guy in the front row.
This is a mistrial. No need for jury deliberations. The judge needs to do his job.
The people causing all the problems are the same people Rittenhouse took care of when defending himself. Lol, the irony. Threaten someone’s life and they should always be able to defend themselves.
“All the problems.” Care to elaborate on your analysis?
@@ACTHdan Sure. Death threats to the judge, lawyers out there, and intimidating the jury to attempt to sway the outcome of the trial. They are equal to the people rioting in the streets, burning businesses down, hurting people, attacking the police. You know…. People causing the problems. Pretty define
Amen
Not Guilty!
Binger is the real criminal there
This judge is amazing. Excellent judge....totally unbiased....Just amazing.
Throw the case out Judge‼️
Yeah good, so they can retry the case with a non racist scumbag judge
@@VibeinATLien Where's the proof of racism? Is that all you leftist can say?
it aint that simple.calm down
Racism is weak clowns with guns are easily defeated
One more dirty trick. How has he not been in contempt of court is beyond me. Someone the prosecutor's are charged with official misconduct. It's so obvious!
@Lone wolf I'm so sorry that your education system failed to teach you basic court rights.
I'm not in America and this is basic to not bring evidence without stating it pre-trial, to not interrupt the judge, to not breach Right to Remain Silent, and importantly, misuse Public Tax for Kangaroo Court.
Last time they jailed a grandma for stealing sandals (A single damn pair of sandals worth $2), the court got destroyed.
If it's false evidence or one side not given evidence.....it should be dismissed with prejudice...NOT GUILTY
@@rickjackson3631 oh yes....and he was found NOT Guilty
Shouldn’t this be a mistrial with prejudice already???? Mr. Rittenhouse should be found not guilty but the deliberations is taking to long…a not guilty verdict which should have come out shouldn’t take this long….the corrupt prosecutor threw in extra charges which are lower level crimes but the prosecutor is reaching high….
The jury is mostly women. They are terrified of the public
That’s not true. The fact that it’s taking so long I feel is a good thing. The George Floyd decision came quick and it was guilty. There are probably a few that think he is guilty and ones that think he is innocent. They have to convince each other.
@@j.h.3927 Chauvin was most certainly guilty of second-degree murder. Rittenhouse is not guilty of the crimes charged, but some on the jury likely believe he should be guilty of something and are holding out.
@@kjjunior7918 You are obviously not watching the case and are ignorant of the law.
@@kjjunior7918 room temperature IQ lmao
That poor kid. Stuck being the fall out boy for the states incompetence's.
Happens a lot especially if u r an ordinary person as I am, Kyle is
How much more evidence do they want
To see that this was self defense??😒
We don't care if people are rioting and burning your neighborhood, we don't care if they are armed, we don't care if they're the worst possible kind of people, we don't care if they attack you first; you are never allowed to defend yourself and if you do... this is what will happen.
That's the sum of it. Mob rule and the government in collusion with it and the media included.
Beyond sickening!!!! Justice for Kyle!!!💪🙏🇺🇸
Makes me think of January 6th. Should've been a lot more insurrectionists capped
The only sentence Kyle should get is *"you're free to go"*
And then start suing the media into oblivion!
♥️
Should never been in court to begin with
The only thing Kyle is guilty of is not taking out the 3rd attacker!!!
Agreed. Not an American
"in a world of Rosenbaums, be a Rittenhouse"
Namaste.
Hare Krsna.
Rosenbaum was a pedi didn’t u know. Chasing Kyle shirtless head scarf an old man who should be OFF the streets
When I watch some of those people out in front of The Pourhouse it amazes me. It doesn't take much for the public to become animals. The BLM movement is there to see what trouble they can make for everyone in Kenosha
The judge has allowed things in the trial against his better judgement. That shows weakness. It hurts Kyle's right to a fair trial.
Got an example? He prevented the defense from showing a video of Kyle days before the kenosha talking about how he wanted to shoot looters which could have been pretty damning.
If the mayor and Governor had done their jobs Kyle wouldn't have been in this position.
He would have been in that position anyways. He went there to protect his father's house from a fire. And because he was armed with a deadly weapon he thought he could intimidate people so he went around playing the Vigilante trying to protect other people's property. Riots are what they are people are going to destroy things in riots he had no business defending people's property that's covered under insurance. The Engage The Mob and then they chase them and now he's claiming self-defense he started it. He might be a serial killer he's 18 and handling a gun and now he's claiming self-defense. He's guilty clearly.
If “Kyle” hadn’t been an underage kid traveling with a weapon to a riot and shooting 3 people he wouldn’t be in this position as well. Three people would be alive and well today if he’d just stayed home with his mother.
Sham trial is just as embarrassing as the Biden Administration. Let's go Brandon!
What a sad existence you live
Innocent with Prejudice against the Prosecution. The Prosecution is working hard for a mistrial so they can retrial Rittenhouse. Shame on the Prosecution.
How the hell is this still going on. Wisconsin state law states that self defense only has to be somewhat proven. He proved fully that it was self defense
2 of the jurours are holding it up because they fear for thier lives...
Politics
@@DenofDragons
Spineless fools. Do they really think that giving in to terrorists will keep them safe? All that does is embolden those people to do MORE jury intimidation in the future.
Lol white people u guys are funny
@@augustday9483 i agree.. its a sad state that we have given our justice system over to the mob rule... ask the romans how that ended up...
A youth's life here is at stake. Adults are playing with words like children. In my opinion this case just goes to show the justice system has become a joke and nobody is really interested in the youth.
These so called 'lawyers' need prosecuting. Disgraceful.
More like the DA
I stand With Kyle 🖤
Lock up the prosecutors let Kyle go not guilty this kid is a hero
😂 you can tell the judge thinks the prosecutor is a joke as much as I do😂
“Kyle Rittenhouse did not kill himself.”
…Just getting ahead of this.
The Clinton's aren't involved so I think he's safe from being suicided lol
😂😂😂
"How would you like to be put on trial for a crime and the judge introduced the case to the jury by introducing you as the defendant and the person who is accusing you as the victim?" The State is accusing Rittenhouse.
That's what a prosecution in a court of law does!
When you murder people. You have victims
@@thedevilsadvocate5210 You are innocent until proven guilty. I he is guilty of murder is the question here in court right now. As long as he hasn't been convicted it is wrong to declare the accuser as a victim.
Ummm, because he killed and injured people, maybe? He illegally drove to Wisconsin, picked up his illegally obtained firearm and illegally carried it into a situation that didn't concern him. I'm thinking that the little piece of work should be held accountable and that scene of crocodile tears was the worst I've ever seen.
@@phjerseys70 because your people were burning the city down over someone who deserved to be shot
Well, let’s get to the acquittal. It’s time for Target’s semi-annual sale where everything is free.
I love this judge . The boy did what needed to be done in this case.
The boy shot 3 people!
@@anitavisram8346 3 people who were trying to inflict bodily harm to the defendant within all the chaos. I suppose he should have let the first one take his weapon, let the second continue to beat him with the skateboard and let the third shoot him? He tried to run and remove himself from the situation, they just didn't let him.
@@anitavisram8346 Good.
@@anitavisram8346 three people actively attacking him
Poor kid ? I am so proud of this young man I don't know if I could be like him being young man . This should be a mistrial case closed
@Lone wolf he was brave.
@Lone wolf Not a vigilante. Dude was armed, but so were plenty of rioters-were they all vigilantes? He didn’t fire his weapon to act out vigilante justice but to defend himself when he was on the ground being charged at by multiple ppl-that’s allowed.
Really stupid kid for showing up at the riot at all, particularly with an AR. But not a vigilante in the final analysis. That’s why the prosecution is having so much trouble
Holy cow, the games they play... It's not even about Rittenhouse anymore!
I've never seen a trial like this where no one knows how to proceed to the next step lol
Because it’s a mock trial set up to take attention away from Grislaine trafficking trial in now in NYC or the spa
The jury should have access to all the evidence. In private for deliberation.
they just had to go home and watch tv
The judge wouldn't allow quite a bit to be presented, coincidentally everything that the prosecution could've used
@@susanlindsay7970 .any body that believes the jury don't watch the news etc. ,and discuss it with their families are naive! Hopefully they're more persuaded to acquit him.
@@paulaheckman9928 That's what I said!! Yes, our self defense rights are on the line. This country is going to H. LET'S GO BRANDON!!!
Prosecution lawyers need to give up their licenses.
@Lone wolf Yep. Can’t wait for Rittenhouse to file the lawsuit against Biden.
So, the defense brings up a legitimate point, or two, the judge asks the prosecutor if it's true. The prosecutor prevaricates and the judge moves on to media lies?! Something's not right.
Yeah your right why didn’t he get a answer to that question about instructions stating should not be used in a court of law , and why did you the state not provide the defense with the same video the state had and with holding it for weeks what a bunch of crap
non-contiguous footage
Why does the judge care more about how he looks under public scrutiny than answering the defenses motion
because this isn't a trial, it's a political circus intended to stir the pot with citizens and whip them into a frenzy.
@@mervunit why wouldn’t a mistrial with prejudice charge not start the frenzy they want ? We all know only one side loots n riots
Becouse left making it like some white supremacy guy went to kenosha kill black peoples?but for some strange reason all peoples involved in this case are white..
i think he really wants to declare a mistrial but is worried about blowback
@@enjoylife1239 media lied so much about the facts to the point where it’s really scary n demonic
This judge is great
When the prosecutor point the gun at the jury with his finger on the trigger and a juror was armed and shot and killed him would that be self defense?
I would say yes!
That would be negligent homicide I would think….maybe more than that.
Context matters. In this case, the prosecutor was making a prosecutorial point, and while some in the jury may in fact have felt "threatened", I don't think any trial would come to the conclusion that the juror had reason to actually feel threatened given the context of the courtroom and it being part of closing arguments. Of course this obviates the point, how did the juror even have a gun in the courtroom to begin with?
"Not if I shoot first"
--Alec
Was it loaded ? Cause ...
The only victim in this whole shitshow is Kyle Rittenhouse
This judge appears very casual but he is the sharpest knife in the box by a country mile.
Kyle, you’re in our prayers!
@Lone wolf it was self defense if you can’t see thst jesus
Criminal conduct by the prosecution. Kyle must be acquitted at this point, regardless of where the jury is in deliberations, and a mistrial to follow suit. Do the right thing, Judge. This should have been dismissed with prejudice a long time ago.
Yes let Kyle go home today
Guilty BEYOND REASONABLE DOUBT??? No way. If no mistrial, then totally innocent.
This judge is starting to worry me. Im starting to get the feeling that he is too worried about how he will be viewed in the court of public opinion and its starting to effect his decision making. He is letting the Prosecutors jump through loop hole after loop hole to win their case. He should have already ended this trial with a mistrial, but he wants it to keep going so he can keep talking about himself on TV.
Wouldnt doubt if he's angling for a TV judge show.
I agree. I find it extremely odd that he is reading and taking offense to courtroom news articles. Appalling.
@@lynn9496 Okay, well maybe I misunderstood what he was talking about.
I'd watch that show, when is it on??
"Prosecutors jump through loop hole after loop hole to win their case"
Most people opnions is "not guilty", why then you think he would be on prosecutor side with that reasoning?